CHAPTER IV. (p. 079)

SECOND WINTER IN EDINBURGH.

These summer and autumn wanderings ended, Burns returned to Edinburgh,

and spent there the next five months from the latter part of October,

1787, till the end of March, 1788, in a way which to any man, much

more to such an one as he, could give small satisfaction. The

ostensible cause of his lingering in Edinburgh was to obtain a

settlement with his procrastinating publisher, Creech, because till

this was effected, he had no money with which to enter on the

contemplated farm, or on any other regular way of life. Probably in

thus wasting his time, Burns may have been influenced more than he

himself was aware, by a secret hope that something might yet be done

for him--that all the smiles lavished on him by the great and powerful

could not possibly mean nothing, and that he should be left to drudge

on in poverty and obscurity as before.

During this winter Burns changed his quarters from Richmond's lodging

in High Street, where he had lived during the former winter, to a

house then marked 2, now 30, St. James's Square in the New Town. There

he lived with a Mr. Cruikshank, a colleague of his friend Nicol in the

High School, and there he continued to reside till he left Edinburgh.

More than once he paid brief visits to Nithsdale, and examined (p. 080)

again and yet again the farm on the Dalswinton property, on which he

had long had his eye. This was his only piece of serious business

during those months. The rest of his time was spent more or less in

the society of his jovial companions. We hear no more during this

second winter of his meetings with literary professors, able advocates

and judges, or fashionable ladies. His associates seem to have been

rather confined to men of the Ainslie and Nicol stamp. He would seem

also to have amused himself with flirtations with several young

heroines, whose acquaintance he had made during the previous summer.

The chief of these were two young ladies, Miss Margaret Chalmers and

Miss Charlotte Hamilton, cousins of each other, and relatives of his

Mauchline friend, Gavin Hamilton. These he had met during the two

visits which he paid to Harvieston, on the river Devon, where they

were living for a time. On his return to Edinburgh he continued to

correspond with them both, and to address songs of affection, if not

of love, now to one, now to another. To Charlotte Hamilton he

addressed the song beginning,--

How pleasant the banks of the clear winding Devon;

To Miss Chalmers, one with the opening lines,--

Where, braving angry winter's storms,

The lofty Ochils rise;

And another beginning thus,--

My Peggy's face, my Peggy's form.

Which of these young ladies was foremost in Burns's affection, it is

not easy now to say, nor does it much signify. To both he wrote some

of his best letters, and some of not his best verses. Allan (p. 081)

Cunningham thinks that he had serious affection for Miss Hamilton. The

latest editor of his works asserts that his heart was set on Miss

Chalmers, and that she, long afterwards in her widowhood, told Thomas

Campbell the poet, that Burns had made a proposal of marriage to her.

However this may be, it is certain that while both admitted him to

friendship, neither encouraged his advances. They were better "advised

than to do so." Probably they knew too much of his past history and

his character to think of him as a husband. Both were soon after this

time married to men more likely to make them happy than the erratic

poet. When they turned a deaf ear to his addresses, he wrote: "My

rhetoric seems to have lost all its effect on the lovely half of

mankind; I have seen the day, but that is a tale of other years. In my

conscience, I believe, that my heart has been so often on fire that it

has been vitrified!" Well perhaps for him if it had been so, such

small power had he to guide it. Just about the time when he found

himself rejected, notwithstanding all his fine letters and his verses,

by the two young ladies on Devon banks, he met with an accident

through the upsetting of a hackney coach by a drunken driver. The fall

left him with a bruised limb, which confined him to his room from the

7th of December till the middle of February (1787).

During these weeks he suffered much from low spirits, and the letters

which he then wrote under the influence of that hypochondria and

despondency contain some of the gloomiest bursts of discontent with

himself and with the world, which he ever gave vent to either in prose

or verse. He describes himself as the "sport, the miserable victim of

rebellious pride, hypochondriac imagination, agonizing sensibility,

and Bedlam passions. I wish I were dead, but I'm no like to (p. 082)

die.... I fear I am something like undone; but I hope for the best.

Come, stubborn Pride and unshrinking Resolution; accompany me through

this to me miserable world! I have a hundred times wished that one

could resign life, as an officer resigns a commission; for I would not

take in any poor wretch by selling out. Lately I was a sixpenny

private, and, God knows, a miserable soldier enough; now I march to

the campaign, a starving cadet--a little more conspicuously wretched."

But his late want of success on the banks of Devon, and his consequent

despondency, were alike dispelled from his thoughts by a new

excitement. Just at the time when he met with his accident, he had

made the acquaintance of a certain Mrs. M'Lehose, and acquaintance all

at once became a violent attachment on both sides. This lady had been

deserted by her husband, who had gone to the West Indies, leaving her

in poverty and obscurity to bring up two young boys as best she might.

We are told that she was "of a somewhat voluptuous style of beauty, of

lively and easy manners, of a poetical fabric of mind, with some wit,

and not too high a degree of refinement or delicacy--exactly the kind

of woman to fascinate Burns." Fascinated he certainly was. On the 30th

December he writes; "Almighty love still reigns and revels in my

bosom, and I am at this moment ready to hang myself for a young

Edinburgh widow, who has wit and wisdom more murderously fatal than

the assassinating stiletto of the Sicilian bandit, or the poisoned

arrow of the savage African." For several months his visits to her

house were frequent, his letters unremitting. The sentimental

correspondence which they began, in which Burns addresses her as

Clarinda, assuming to himself the name of Sylvander, has been (p. 083)

published separately, and become notorious. Though this correspondence

may contain, as Lockhart says, "passages of deep and noble feeling,

which no one but Burns could have penned," it cannot be denied that it

contains many more of such fustian, such extravagant bombast, as Burns

or any man beyond twenty might well have been ashamed to write. One

could wish that for the poet's sake this correspondence had never been

preserved. It is so humiliating to read this torrent of falsetto

sentiment now, and to think that a man gifted like Burns should have

poured it forth. How far his feelings towards Clarinda were sincere,

or how far they were wrought up to amuse his vacancy by playing at

love-making, it is hard to say. Blended with a profusion of forced

compliments and unreal raptures, there are expressions in Burns's

letters which one cannot but believe that he meant in earnest, at the

moment when he wrote them. Clarinda, it would seem, must have regarded

Burns as a man wholly disengaged, and have looked forward to the

possible removal of Mr. M'Lehose, and with him of the obstacle to a

union with Burns. How far he may have really shared the same hopes it

is impossible to say. We only know that he used again and again

language of deepest devotion, vowing to "love Clarinda to death,

through death, and for ever."

While this correspondence between Sylvander and Clarinda was in its

highest flight of rapture, Burns received, in January or February,

1788, news from Mauchline which greatly agitated him. His renewed

intercourse with Jean Armour had resulted in consequences which again

stirred her father's indignation; this time so powerfully, that he

turned his daughter to the door. Burns provided a shelter for her

under the roof of a friend; but for a time he does not seem to (p. 084)

have thought of doing more than this. Whether he regarded the original

private marriage as entirely dissolved, and looked on himself as an

unmarried man, does not quite appear. Anyhow, he and Clarinda, who

knew all that had passed with regard to Jean Armour, seem to have then

thought that enough had been done for the seemingly discarded

Mauchline damsel, and to have carried on their correspondence as

rapturously as ever for fully another six weeks, until the 21st of

March (1788). On that day Sylvander wrote to Clarinda a final letter,

pledging himself to everlasting love, and following it by a copy of

verses beginning,--

Fair empress of the poet's soul,

presenting her at the same time with a pair of wineglasses as a

parting gift.

On the 24th of March, he turned his back on Edinburgh, and never

returned to it for more than a day's visit.

Before leaving town, however, he had arranged three pieces of business,

all bearing closely on his future life. First, he had secured for

himself an appointment in the Excise through the kindness of "Lang

Sandy Wood," the surgeon who attended him when laid up with a bruised

limb, and who had interceded with Mr. Graham of Fintray, the chief of

the Excise Board, on Burns' behalf. When he received his appointment,

he wrote to Miss Chalmers, "I have chosen this, my dear friend, after

mature deliberation. The question is not at what door of fortune's

palace shall we enter in, but what doors does she open for us. I was

not likely to get anything to do. I got this without hanging-on, or

mortifying solicitation; it is immediate bread, and though poor in

comparison of the last eighteen months of my existence, 'tis (p. 085)

luxury in comparison of all my preceding life."

Next, he had concluded a bargain with Mr. Miller of Dalswinton, to

lease his farm of Ellisland, on which he had long set his heart, and

to which he had paid several visits in order to inspect it.

Lastly, he had at last obtained a business settlement with Creech

regarding the Second Edition of his Poems. Before this was effected,

Burns had more than once lost his temper, and let Creech know his

mind. Various accounts have been given of the profits that now accrued

to Burns from the whole transaction. We cannot be far wrong in taking

the estimate at which Dr. Chambers arrived, for on such a matter he

could speak with authority. He sets down the poet's profits at as

nearly as possible 500_l._ Of this sum Burns gave 180_l._ to his

brother Gilbert, who was now in pecuniary trouble. "I give myself no

airs on this," he writes, "for it was mere selfishness on my part; I

was conscious that the wrong scale of the balance was pretty heavily

charged, and I thought that throwing a little filial piety and

fraternal affection into the scale in my favour, might help to smooth

matters at the grand reckoning." This money was understood by the

family to be the provision due from Robert on behalf of his mother,

the support of whom he was now, that he was setting up for himself,

about to throw on his younger brother. Chambers seems to reckon that

as another 120_l._ must have been spent by Burns on his tours, his

accident, and his sojourn in Edinburgh since October, he could not

have more than 200_l._ over, with which to set up at Ellisland. We see

in what terms Burns had written to Clarinda on the 21st of March. On

his leaving Edinburgh and returning to Ayrshire, he married Jean

Armour, and forthwith acknowledged her in letters as his wife. (p. 086)

This was in April, though it was not till August that he and Jean

appeared before the Kirk-Session, and were formally recognized as man

and wife by the Church.

Whether, in taking this step, Burns thought that he was carrying out a

legal, as well as a moral, obligation, we know not. The interpreters

of the law now assert that the original marriage in 1786 had never

been dissolved, and that the destruction of the promissory lines, and

the temporary disownment of him by Jean and her family, could not in

any way invalidate it. Indeed after all that had happened, for Burns

to have deserted Jean, and married another, even if he legally could

have done so, would have been the basest infidelity. Amid all his

other errors and inconsistencies, and no doubt there were enough of

these, we cannot but be glad for the sake of his good name that he now

acted the part of an honest man, and did what he could to repair the

much suffering and shame he had brought on his frail but faithful

Jean.

As to the reasons which determined Burns to marry Jean Armour, and not

another, this is the account he himself gives when writing to Mrs.

Dunlop, one of his most trusted correspondents, to whom he spoke out

his real heart in a simpler, more natural way, than was usual with him

in letter-writing:--

"You are right that a bachelor state would have ensured me more

friends; but, from a cause you will easily guess, conscious peace in

the enjoyment of my own mind, and unmistrusting confidence in

approaching my God, would seldom have been of the number. I found a

once much-loved, and still much-loved, female, literally and truly

cast out to the mercy of the naked elements; but I enabled her to

purchase a shelter;--there is no sporting with a fellow-creature's (p. 087)

happiness or misery. The most placid good-nature and sweetness of

disposition; a warm heart, gratefully devoted with all its powers to

love me; vigorous health and sprightly cheerfulness, set off to the

best advantage by a more than commonly handsome figure: these I think,

in a woman may make a good wife, though she should never have read a

page but the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, nor have danced

in a brighter assembly than a penny pay wedding."

To Miss Chalmers he says:--

"I have married my Jean. I had a long and much-loved fellow-creature's

happiness or misery in my determination, and I durst not trifle with

so important a deposit, nor have I any cause to repent it. If I have

not got polite tittle-tattle, modish manners, and fashionable dress, I

am not sickened and disquieted with the multiform curse of

boarding-school affectation; and I have got the handsomest figure, the

sweetest temper, the soundest constitution, and the kindest heart in

the country.... A certain late publication of Scots poems she has

perused very devoutly, and all the ballads in the country, as she has

the finest wood-note wild I ever heard."

There have been many comments on this turning-point in Burns' life.

Some have given him high praise for it, as though he had done a heroic

thing in voluntarily sacrificing himself, when it might have been open

to him to form a much higher connexion. But all such praise seems

entirely thrown away. It was not, as it appears, open to him to form

any other marriage legally; certainly it was not open to him morally.

The remark of Lockhart is entirely true, that, "had he hesitated to

make her his wife, whom he loved, and who was the mother of his children,

he must have sunk into the callousness of a ruffian." Lockhart (p. 088)

need hardly have added, "or into that misery of miseries, the remorse

of a poet."

But even had law and morality allowed him to pass by Jean,--which they

did not,--would it have been well for Burns, if he had sought, as one

of his biographers regrets that he had not done, a wife among ladies

of higher rank and more refined manners? That he could appreciate what

these things imply, is evident from his own confession in looking back

on his introduction to what is called society: "A refined and

accomplished woman was a being altogether new to me, and of which I

had formed a very inadequate idea." It requires but little knowledge

of the world and its ways to see the folly of all such regrets. Great

disparity of condition in marriage seldom answers. And in the case of

a wayward, moody man, with the pride, the poverty, and the

irregularities of Burns, and the drudging toil which must needs await

his wife, it is easy to see what misery such a marriage would have

stored up for both. As it was, the marriage he made was, to put it at

the lowest, one of the most prudent acts of his life. Jean proved to

be all, and indeed more than all, he anticipates in the letters above

given. During the eight years of their married life, according to all

testimony, she did her part as a wife and mother with the most patient

and placid fidelity, and bore the trials which her husband's irregular

habits entailed on her, with the utmost long-suffering. And after his

death, during her long widowhood, she revered his memory, and did her

utmost to maintain the honour of his name.

With his marriage to his Ayrshire wife, Burns had bid farewell to

Edinburgh, and to whatever high hopes it may have at anytime kindled

within him, and had returned to a condition somewhat nearer to that

in which he was born. With what feelings did he pass from this (p. 089)

brilliant interlude, and turn the corner which led him back to the

dreary road of commonplace drudgery, which he hoped to have escaped?

There can be little doubt that his feelings were those of bitter

disappointment. There had been, it is said, a marked contrast between

the reception he had met with during his first and second winters in

Edinburgh. As Allan Cunningham says, "On his first appearance the

doors of the nobility opened spontaneously, 'on golden hinges turning,'

and he ate spiced meats and drank rare wines, interchanging nods and

smiles with high dukes and mighty earls. A colder reception awaited

his second coming. The doors of lords and ladies opened with a tardy

courtesy; he was received with a cold and measured stateliness, was

seldom requested to stop, seldomer to repeat his visit; and one of his

companions used to relate with what indignant feeling the poet

recounted his fruitless calls and his uncordial receptions in the good

town of Edinburgh.... He went to Edinburgh strong in the belief that

genius such as his would raise him in society; he returned not without

a sourness of spirit, and a bitterness of feeling."

When he did give vent to his bitterness, it was not into man's, but

into woman's sympathetic ear that he poured his complaint. It is thus

he writes, some time after settling at Ellisland, to Mrs. Dunlop,

showing how fresh was still the wound within. "When I skulk into a

corner lest the rattling equipage of some gaping blockhead should

mangle me in the mire, I am tempted to exclaim, 'What merits has he

had, or what demerit have I had, in some previous state of existence,

that he is ushered into this state of being with the sceptre of rule,

and the keys of riches in his puny fist, and I am kicked into the

world, the sport of folly, or the victim of pride?... Often as I (p. 090)

have glided with humble stealth through the pomp of Princes Street, it

has suggested itself to me, as an improvement on the present human

figure, that a man, in proportion to his own conceit of his own

consequence in the world, could have pushed out the longitude of his

common size, as a snail pushes out his horns, or as we draw out a

prospect-glass.'"

This is a feeling which Burns has uttered in many a form of prose and

verse, but which probably never possessed him more bitterly than when

he retired from Edinburgh. Many persons in such circumstances may have

felt thoughts of this kind pass over them for a moment. But they have

felt ashamed of them as they rose, and have at once put them by. Burns

no doubt had a severer trial in this way than most, but he never could

overcome it, never ceased to chafe at that inequality of conditions

which is so strongly fixed in the system in which we find ourselves.

It was natural that he should have felt some bitterness at the changed

countenance which Edinburgh society turned on him, and it is easy to

be sarcastic on the upper ranks of that day for turning it; but were

they really so much to blame? There are many cases under the present

order of things, in which we are constrained to say, "It must needs be

that offences come." Taking men and things as they are, could it well

have been otherwise?

First, the novelty of Burns's advent had worn off by his second winter

in Edinburgh, and, though it may be a weakness, novelty always counts

for something in human affairs. Then, again, the quiet decorous men of

Blair's circle knew more of Burns's ways and doings than at first, and

what they came to know was not likely to increase their desire for (p. 091)

intimacy with him. It was, it seems, notorious that Burns kept that

formidable memorandum-book already alluded to, in which he was

supposed to sketch with unsparing hand, "stern likenesses" of his

friends and benefactors. So little of a secret did he make of this,

that we are told he sometimes allowed a visitor to have a look at the

figures which he had sketched in his portrait-gallery. The knowledge

that such a book existed was not likely to make Blair and his friends

more desirous of his society.

Again, the festivities at the Crochallan Club and other such haunts,

the habits he there indulged in, and the associates with whom he

consorted, these were well known. And it was not possible that either

the ways, the conversation, or the cronies of the Crochallan Club

could be welcomed in quieter and more polished circles. Men of the

Ainslie and Nicol stamp would hardly have been quite in place there.

Again--what is much to the honour of Burns--he never in the highest

access of his fame, abated a jot of his intimacy and friendship

towards the men of his own rank, with whom he had been associated in

his days of obscurity. These were tradesmen, farmers, and peasants.

The thought of them, their sentiments, their prejudices and habits, if

it had been possible, their very persons, he would have taken with

him, without disguise or apology, into the highest circles of rank or

of literature. But this might not be. It was impossible that Burns

could take Mauchline with its belles, its Poosie-Nansies and its

Souter Johnnies, bodily into the library of Dr. Blair or the

drawing-room of Gordon Castle.

A man, to whom it is open, must make his choice; but he cannot live at

once in two different and widely sundered orders of society. To (p. 092)

no one is it given, not even to men of genius great as that of

Burns, for himself and his family entirely to overleap the barriers

with which custom and the world have hedged us in, and to weld the

extremes of society into one. To the speculative as well as to the

practically humane man, the great inequality in human conditions

presents, no doubt, a perplexing problem. A little less worldly pride,

and a little more Christian wisdom and humility, would probably have

helped Burns to solve it better than he did. But besides the social

grievance, which though impalpable is very real, Burns had another

more material and tangible. The great whom he had met in Edinburgh,

whose castles he had visited in the country, might have done something

to raise him at once above poverty and toil, and they did little or

nothing. They had, indeed, subscribed liberally for his Second

Edition, and they had got him a gauger's post, with fifty or sixty

pounds a year, that was all. What more could they, ought they to have

done? To have obtained him an office in some one of the higher

professions was not to be thought of, for a man cannot easily at the

age of eight-and-twenty change his whole line and adapt himself to an

entirely new employment. The one thing they might have combined to do,

was to have compelled Dundas, or some other of the men then in power,

to grant Burns a pension from the public purse. That was the day of

pensions, and hundreds with no claim to compare with Burns's were then

on the pension list: 300_l._ a year would have sufficed to place him

in comfort and independence, and could public money have been better

spent? But though the most rigid economist might not have objected,

would Burns have accepted such a benefaction, had it been offered?

And if he had accepted it, would he not have chafed under the (p. 093)

obligation, more even than he did in the absence of it? Such questions

as these cannot but arise, as often as we think over the fate of

Burns, and ask ourselves, if nothing could have been done to avert it?

Though natural, they are vain. Things hold on their own course to

their inevitable issues, and Burns left Edinburgh, and set his face

first towards Ayrshire, then to Nithsdale, a saddened and embittered

man.

Robert Burns(#21330) · 第 4 / 8 章