CHRIST'S TOUCH

'Jesus put forth His hand, and touched him.'--Mark i. 41.

Behold the servant of the Lord' might be the motto of this Gospel, and

'He went about doing good and healing' the summing up of its facts. We

have in it comparatively few of our Lord's discourses, none of His

longer, and not very many of His briefer ones. It contains but four

parables. This Evangelist gives no miraculous birth as in Matthew, no

angels adoring there as in Luke, no gazing into the secrets of

Eternity, where the Word who afterwards became flesh dwelt in the

bosom of the Father, as in John. He begins with a brief reference to

the Forerunner, and then plunges into the story of Christ's life of

service to man and service for God.

In carrying out his conception the Evangelist omits many things found

in the other Gospels, which involve the idea of dignity and dominion,

while he adds to the incidents which he has in common with them not a

few fine and subtle touches to heighten the impression of our Lord's

toil and eagerness in His patient, loving service. Perhaps it may be

an instance of this that we find more prominence given to our Lord's

touch as connected with His miracles than in the other Gospels, or

perhaps it may merely be an instance of the vivid portraiture, the

result of a keen eye for externals, which is so marked a

characteristic of this gospel. Whatever the reason, the fact is plain,

that Mark delights to dwell on Christ's touch. The instances are

these--first, He puts out His hand, and 'lifts up' Peter's wife's

mother, and immediately the fever leaves her (i. 31); then, unrepelled

by the foul disease, He lays His pure hand upon the leper, and the

living mass of corruption is healed (i. 41); again, He lays His hand

on the clammy marble of the dead child's forehead, and she lives (v.

41). Further, we have the incidental statement that He was so hindered

in His mighty works by unbelief that He could only lay His hands on a

few sick folk and heal them (vi. 5). We find next two remarkable

incidents, peculiar to Mark, both like each other and unlike our

Lord's other miracles. One is the gradual healing of that deaf and

dumb man whom Christ took apart from the crowd, laid His hands on him,

thrust His fingers into his ears as if He would clear some impediment,

touched his tongue with saliva, said to him, 'Be opened'; and the man

could hear (vii. 34). The other is, the gradual healing of a blind man

whom our Lord again leads apart from the crowd, takes by the hand,

lays His own kind hands upon the poor, sightless eyeballs, and with

singular slowness of progress effects a cure, not by a leap and a

bound as He generally does, but by steps and stages; tries it once and

finds partial success, has to apply the curative process again, and

then the man can see (viii. 23). In addition to these instances there

are two other incidents which may also be adduced. It is Mark alone

who records for us the fact that He took little children in His arms,

and blessed them. And it is Mark alone who records for us the fact

that when He came down from the Mount of Transfiguration He laid His

hand upon the demoniac boy, writhing in the grip of his tormentor, and

lifted him up.

There is much taught us, if we will patiently consider it, by that

touch of Christ's, and I wish to try to bring out its meaning and

power.

I. Whatever diviner and sacreder aspect there may be in these

incidents, the first thing, and in some senses the most precious

thing, in them is that they are the natural expression of a truly

human tenderness and compassion.

Now we are so accustomed, and as I believe quite rightly, to look at

all Christ's life down to its minutest events as intended to be a

revelation of God, that we are sometimes apt to think about it as if

His motive and purpose in everything was didactic. So an unreality

creeps over our conceptions of Christ's life, and we need to be

reminded that He was not always acting and speaking in order to convey

instruction, but that words and deeds were drawn from Him by the play

of simple human feelings. He pitied not only in order to teach us the

heart of God, but because His own man's heart was touched with a

feeling of men's infirmities. We are too apt to think of Him as posing

before men with the intent of giving the great revelation of the Love

of God. It is the love of Christ Himself, spontaneous, instinctive,

without the thought of anything but the suffering that it sees, which

gushes out and leads Him to put forth His hand to the outcast beggars,

the blind, the deaf, the lepers. That is the first great lesson we

have to learn from this and other stories--the swift human sympathy

and heart of grace and tenderness which Jesus Christ had for all human

suffering, and has to-day as truly as ever.

There is more than this instinctive sympathy taught by Christ's touch,

but it is distinctly taught. How beautifully that comes out in the

story of the leper! That wretched man had long dwelt in his isolation.

The touch of a friend's hand or the kiss of loving lips had been long

denied him. Christ looks on him, and before He reflects, the

spontaneous impulse of pity breaks through the barriers of legal

prohibitions and of natural repugnance, and leads Him to lay His holy

and healing hand on his foulness.

True pity always instinctively leads us to seek to come near those who

are its objects. A man tells his friend some sad story of his

sufferings, and while he speaks, unconsciously his listener lays his

hand on his arm, and, by a silent pressure, speaks his sympathy. So

Christ did with these men--not only in order that He might reveal God

to us, but because He was a man, and therefore felt ere He thought.

Out flashed from His heart the swift sympathy, followed by the tender

pressure of the loving hand--a hand that tried through flesh to reach

spirit, and come near the sufferer that it might succour and remove

the sorrow.

Christ's pity is shown by His touch to have this true characteristic

of true pity, that it overcomes disgust. All real sympathy does that.

Christ is not turned away by the shining whiteness of the leprosy, nor

by the eating pestilence beneath it; He is not turned away by the

clammy marble hand of the poor dead maiden, nor by the fevered skin of

the old woman gasping on her pallet. He lays hold on each, the flushed

patient, the loathsome leper, the sacred dead, with the all-equalising

touch of a universal love and pity, which disregards all that is

repellent, and overflows every barrier and pours itself over every

sufferer. We have the same pity of the same Christ to trust to and to

lay hold of to-day. He is high above us and yet bending over us;

stretching His hand from the throne as truly as He put it out when

here on earth; and ready to take us all to His heart in spite of our

weakness and wickedness, our failings and our shortcomings, the fever

of our flesh and hearts' desires, the leprosy of our many corruptions,

and the death of our sins,--and to hold us ever in the strong, gentle

clasp of His divine, omnipotent, and tender hand. This Christ lays

hold on us because He loves us, and will not be turned from His

compassion by the most loathsome foulness of ours.

II. And now take another point of view from which we may regard this

touch of Christ: namely, as the medium of His miraculous power.

There is nothing to me more remarkable about the miracles of our Lord

than the royal variety of His methods of healing. Sometimes He works

at a distance, sometimes He requires, as it would appear for good

reasons, the proximity of the person to be blessed. Sometimes He works

by a simple word: 'Lazarus, come forth!' 'Peace be still!' 'Come out

of him!' sometimes by a word and a touch, as in the instances before

us; sometimes by a touch without a word; sometimes by a word and a

touch and a vehicle, as in the saliva that was put on the tongue and

in the ears of the deaf, and on the eyes of the blind; sometimes by a

vehicle without a word, without a touch, without His presence, as when

He said, 'Go wash in the pool of Siloam, and he washed and was clean.'

So the divine worker varies infinitely and at pleasure, yet not

arbitrarily but for profound, even if not always discoverable,

reasons, the methods of His miracle-working power, in order that we

may learn by these varieties of ways that He is tied to no way; and

that His hand, strong and almighty, uses methods and tosses aside

methods according to His pleasure, the methods being vitalised when

they are used by His will, and being nothing at all in themselves.

The very variety of His methods, then, teaches us that the true cause

in every case is His own bare will. A simple word is the highest and

most adequate expression of that will. His word is all-powerful: and

that is the very signature of divinity. Of whom has it been true from

of old that 'He spake and it was done, He commanded and it stood

fast'? Do you believe in a Christ whose bare will, thrown among

material things, makes them all plastic, as clay in the potter's

hands, whose mouth rebukes the demons and they flee, rebukes death and

it looses its grasp, rebukes the tempest and there is a calm, rebukes

disease and there comes health?

But this use of Christ's touch as apparent means for conveying His

miraculous power also serves as an illustration of a principle which

is exemplified in all His revelation, namely, the employment in

condescension to men's weakness, of outward means as the apparent

vehicles of His spiritual power. Just as by the material vehicle

sometimes employed for cure, He gave these poor sense-bound natures a

ladder by which their faith in His healing power might climb, so in

the manner of His revelation and communication of His spiritual gifts,

there is provision for the wants of us men, who ever need some body

for spirit to make itself manifest by, some form for the ethereal

reality, some 'tabernacle' for the 'sun.' 'Sacraments,' outward

ceremonies, forms of worship, are vehicles which the Divine Spirit

uses in order to bring His gifts to the hearts and the minds of men.

They are like the touch of the Christ which heals, not by any virtue

in itself, apart from His will which chooses to make it the apparent

medium of healing. All these externals are nothing, as the pipes of an

organ are nothing, until His breath is breathed through them, and then

the flood of sweet sound pours out.

Do not despise the material vehicles and the outward helps which

Christ uses for the communication of His healing and His life, but

remember that the help that is done upon earth, He does it all

Himself. Even Christ's touch is nothing, if it were not for His own

will which flows through it.

III. Consider Christ's touch as a shadow and symbol of the very heart

of His work.

Go back to the past history of this man. Ever since his disease

declared itself no human being had touched him. If he had a wife he

had been separated from her; if he had children their lips had never

kissed his, nor their little hands found their way into his hard palm.

Alone he had been walking with the plague-cloth over his face, and the

cry 'Unclean!' on his lips, lest any man should come near him.

Skulking in his isolation, how he must have hungered for the touch of

a hand! Every Jew was forbidden to approach him but the priest, who,

if he were cured, might pass his hand over the place and pronounce him

clean. And here comes a Man who breaks down all the restrictions,

stretches a frank hand out across the walls of separation, and touches

him. What a reviving assurance of love not yet dead must have come to

the man as Christ grasped his hand, even if he saw in Him only a

stranger who was not afraid of him and did not turn from him!

But beside this thrill of human sympathy, which came hope--bringing to

the leper, Christ's touch had much significance, if we remember that,

according to the Mosaic legislation, the priest and the priest alone

was to lay his hands on the tainted skin and pronounce the leper

whole. So Christ's touch was a priest's touch. He lays His hand on

corruption and is not tainted. The corruption with which He comes in

contact becomes purity. Are not these really the profoundest truths as

to His whole work in the world? What is it all but laying hold of the

leper and the outcast and the dead--His sympathy leading to His

identification of Himself with us in our weakness and misery?

That sympathetic life-bringing touch is put forth once for all in His

Incarnation and Death. 'He taketh hold of the seed of Abraham,' says

the Epistle to the Hebrews, looking at our Lord's work under this same

metaphor, and explaining that His laying hold of men was His being

'made in all points like unto His brethren.' Just as he took hold of

the fevered woman and lifted her from her bed; or, as He thrust His

fingers into the deaf ears of that poor man stopped by some

impediment, so, in analogous fashion, He becomes one of those whom He

would save and help. In His assumption of humanity and in His bowing

of His head to death, we behold Him laying hold of our weakness and

entering into the fellowship of our pains and of the fruit of sin.

Just as He touches the leper and in unpolluted, or the fever patient

and receives no contagion, or the dead and draws no chill of mortality

into His warm hand, so He becomes like His brethren in all things, yet

without sin. Being found in 'the likeness of sinful flesh,' He knows

no sin, but wears His manhood unpolluted and dwells among men

'blameless and harmless, the Son of God, without rebuke.' Like a

sunbeam passing through foul water untarnished and unstained; or like

some sweet spring rising in the midst of the salt sea, which yet

retains its freshness and pours it over the surrounding bitterness, so

Christ takes upon Himself our nature and lays hold of our stained

hands with the hand that continues pure while it grasps us, and will

make us purer if we grasp it.

Brethren, let your touch answer to His; and as He lays hold of us, in

His incarnation and His death, let the hand of our faith clasp His

outstretched hand, and though our hold be as faltering and feeble as

that of the trembling, wasted fingers which one timid woman once laid

on His garment's hem, the blessing which we need will flow into our

veins from the contact. There will be cleansing for our leprosy, sight

for our blindness, life driving out death from its throne in our

hearts, and we shall be able to recount our joyful experience in the

old Psalmist's triumphant strains--'He sent me from above, He laid

hold upon me, He drew me out of many waters.'

IV. Finally, we may look upon these incidents as being in a very

important sense a pattern for us.

No good is to be done by any man to his fellows except at the cost of

true sympathy which leads to identification and contact. The literal

touch of your hand would do more good to some poor outcasts than much

solemn advice, or even much material help flung to them as from a

height above them. A shake of the hand might be more of a means of

grace than a sermon, and more comforting than ever so many free

breakfasts and blankets given superciliously.

And, symbolically, we may say that we must be willing to take those by

the hand whom we wish to help; that is to say, we must come down to

their level, try to see with their eyes, and to think their thoughts,

and let them feel that we do not think our purity too fine to come

beside their filth, nor shrink from them With repugnance, however we

may show disapproval and pity for their sin. Much work done by

Christian people has no effect, nor ever will have, because it has

peeping through it a poorly concealed 'I am holier than thou.' An

instinctive movement of repugnance has ruined many a well-meant

effort.

Christ has come down to us, and has taken all our nature upon Himself.

If there is an outcast and abandoned soul on earth which may not feel

that Jesus has laid a loving and healing touch on him, Jesus is not

the Saviour for the world. He shrinks from none, He unites Himself

with all, therefore 'He is able to save to the uttermost all who come

unto God by Him.' His conduct is the pattern and the law for us. A

Church is a poor affair if it is not a body of people whose experience

of Christ's pity and gratitude for the life which has become theirs

through His wondrous making Himself one with them, compels them to do

the like in their degree for the sinful and the outcast. Thank God,

there are many in every communion who know that constraint of the love

of Christ. But the world will not be healed of its sickness till the

great body of Christian people awakes to feel that the task and honour

of each of them is to go forth bearing Christ's pity certified by

their own.

The sins of professing Christian countries are largely to be laid at

the door of the Church. We are idle when we ought to be at work. We

'pass by on the other side' when bleeding brethren lie with wounds

gaping to be bound up by us. And even when we are moved to service by

Christ's love, and try to do something for our fellows, our work is

often tainted by a sense of our own superiority, and we patronise when

we should sympathise, and lecture when we should beseech.

We must be content to take lepers by the hand, if we would help them

to purity, and to let every outcast feel the warmth of our pitying,

loving grasp, if we would draw them into the forsaken Father's House.

Lay your hands on the sinful as Christ did, and they will recover. All

your holiness and hope come from Christ's laying hold of you. Keep

hold of Him, and make His great pity and loving identification of

Himself with the world of sinners and sufferers, your pattern as well

as your hope, and your touch, too, will have virtue. Keeping hold of

Him who has taken hold of us, you too may be able to say, 'Ephphatha,

be opened,' or to lay your hand on the leper, and he will be cleansed.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Mark · 第 96 / 236 题