CHAPTER VIII

SOCIAL LIFE

Hitherto we have confined ourselves to an outline of the College history

on what may be called its official side. In what follows we deal briefly

with some features of the life of the place.

[Illustration: THE NEW COURT]

The original, and perhaps the chief, purpose of the College in the eyes

of those who founded it was practically that it should form a training

ground for the clergy. The statutes of King Henry VIII. distinctly lay

down that theology is the goal to which philosophy and all other studies

lead, and that none were to be elected Fellows who did not propose to

study theology. The statutes of Elizabeth provided a certain elasticity

by prescribing that those Fellows who did not enter priests' orders

within six years should vacate their fellowships; but that two Fellows

might be allowed, by the Master and a majority of the Senior Fellows, to

devote themselves to the study of medicine. King Charles I. in 1635

allowed a like privilege to be granted from thenceforth to two Fellows

who were to study law. These privileges were not always popular, and we

occasionally find the clerical Fellows complaining that while the

duties of teaching and catechising were laid on them, a man who had held

one of the law or medical fellowships sometimes took orders late in life

and then claimed presentation to a College benefice in virtue of his

seniority as a Fellow, having in the meantime escaped the drudgery to

which the Fellow in orders had been subject.

The emoluments of members of the Society in early times were very

modest, and as prices rose became quite inadequate; the amounts being

named in the College statutes were incapable of alteration, and indirect

means were taken to provide relief. In Bishop Fisher's time it was

considered that an endowment of L6 a year sufficed to found a

fellowship, and L3 a year to found a scholarship. The statutable stipend

of the Master was only L12 a year, though he had some other allowances,

the total amount of which was equally trivial. James Pilkington, Master

from 1559 to 1561, when he became Bishop of Durham, wrote to Lord

Burghley on the subject of his successor, stating that whoever became

Master must have some benefice besides to enable him to live. Richard

Longworth, Master from 1564 to 1569, made a similar complaint, putting

the weekly expenses of his office at L3. We accordingly find that many

of the Masters held country benefices, prebends, or deaneries with their

College office. Lord Keeper Williams, who gave to the College the

advowsons of Soulderne in Oxfordshire, Freshwater in the Isle of Wight,

and the sinecure rectories of St. Florence and Aberdaron in Wales, made

it part of the conditions of his gift that the Master should always be

entitled to take one of these livings if a vacancy occurred. Many of the

Fellows also held benefices or curacies near Cambridge. In the

eighteenth century the business of holding ecclesiastical preferment in

plurality became almost a fine art; thus Sir Isaac Pennington, who was

President of the College and Regius Professor of Physic, left to the

College by his will a fund to provide the sum of L200 a year for the

Master "if he be rector of Freshwater and not otherwise," a direct and

curious incentive to holding in plurality. A Fellow was entitled to his

commons, and, in addition, to allowances of 13s. 4d. under each of the

three heads of "corn," "livery," and "stipend," or, as we may say, food,

clothes, and pocket-money. The College officers received but small

salaries, the most highly paid being the President and Senior Bursar,

who each received L2.

An effort was made by the Statutes of the Realm to improve the condition

of members of colleges. It seems to have been assumed that the rent of a

college farm, like its statutes, could not be altered; but by an Act of

Parliament passed in the eighteenth year of Elizabeth, known as Sir

Thomas Smith's Act, it was enacted that from thenceforth one-third of

the rents were to be paid in wheat and malt; the price of wheat for the

purposes of the Act being assumed to be 6s. 8d. a quarter, and of malt

5s. a quarter. Thus if before the Act the rent of a farm was L6 a year,

after it became law the tenant had to pay L4 in money, three-quarters of

wheat, and four quarters of malt, these two latter items coming to L1

each. But the tenant now paid a rent varying according to the prices of

the day--namely, the money rent plus the cash value of the wheat and

malt according to the best prices of these commodities in Cambridge on

the market-day preceding quarter-day. Thus as the prices of wheat and

malt rose the College benefited. By the Act this variable one-third, or

"corn-money," went to increase the allowance for commons. As time went

on the amount of the corn-money was more than sufficient to pay for the

commons, and a further modest allowance out of the surplus was made to

all who participated in the College revenues, whether as Master, Fellow,

scholar, or sizar, under the name of _praeter_.

In process of time another source of revenue arose. Leases of College

estates were usually granted for a term of forty years, and there was a

general custom that the tenant might surrender his lease at the end of

fourteen years and receive a new one for forty years. As prices rose

tenants were willing to pay a consideration for the renewal known as a

"fine"--this was calculated on the full letting value of the estate at

the time of the renewal, the rent reserved remaining at its traditional

amount. At first this fine-money was regarded as a species of surplus,

and grants were made from it to Fellows or scholars who were ill or in

special need of temporary assistance. The cost of entertaining royalties

or other distinguished visitors, and part of the cost of new buildings,

were defrayed from this source. In the year 1629 the practice arose of

dividing this fine-money up among the Master and Fellows in certain

shares, and the money so paid became known as the "dividend." At the

present time the College property is managed like any other landed

estate, and after the necessary expenses of management and maintenance

have been met, and certain fixed sums paid to the scholars and

exhibitioners, and to the University, the remainder is by the statutes

divided up into shares called dividends, each Fellow getting one

dividend, the Master and the members of the College Council receiving

certain additions calculated in dividends; there is a general

restriction that the dividend shall not exceed L250 a year. The fall in

the value of land at present automatically provides that this limit is

not exceeded; if the revenues become more than sufficient for the

purpose, additional fellowships and scholarships must be established.

The reader will gather that the chief endowment of the College arises

from land. The College estates lie scattered over most of the eastern

side of England, from Yorkshire to Kent. There is no large block of

property anywhere. The estates in past times, when means of

communication were poor, must have been difficult to visit. In the

leases of the more distant farms it was usual to stipulate that the

tenant should provide "horse meat and man's meat" for the Master and

Bursar and their servants while on a tour of inspection. That some care

was bestowed on the management is clear from the regular entries, in the

books of accounts, of the expenses of those "riding on College

business." Probably the estates were visited when leases came to be

renewed, and an effort made to discover the actual letting value of the

property. Land agents seem to have been first employed to make formal

valuations towards the end of the eighteenth century, and about the same

time plans of the estates were obtained, some of these, made before the

enclosures, showing the land scattered in many minute pieces, are very

curious and interesting.

The actual life within the College walls is not so easy to describe with

any certainty. At first, as we have seen, the undergraduates actually

lived with Fellows of the College, and overcrowding must have been a

constant feature of College life. On 15th December 1565 a return was

made to Lord Burghley of all students, "whether tutors or pupils,"

residing in the College, with notes as to whether they had come into

Chapel in their surplices or not. The return concludes with this

summary: "The whole number is 287, whereof there came into the Chappell

with surplesses upon the last Saturdaie and Sondaie 147; and abrode in

the country 33. And of thother 107 whiche cumme not in as yet, there be

many cumme to the Colledge of late and be not yet provided of

surplesses." At this time we have to remember that the buildings of the

College consisted only of the First Court, the Infirmary or Labyrinth,

and a small block of buildings in a corner of the ground now occupied by

the Second Court, swept away when that was built. The arrangement seems

to have been as follows. The ground-floor rooms were occupied by junior

Fellows, each with a few pupils. The rooms on the first floor, known in

the College books as the "middle chambers," were in greater request;

with these went the rooms on the second floor, with sometimes _excelses_

or garrets over them--these could accommodate a senior Fellow with

several pupils. In the older parts of the College the rooms occupied the

whole depth of the building, and so were lighted from both sides; in the

corners, when light could be obtained, cubicles or studies were

partitioned off. From a sanitary point of view, life under such

conditions must have left much to be desired, and the burial registers

of All Saints' parish (in which the older part of the College is

situated) leave the impression of frequent and almost epidemic illness

in the College during the sixteenth and early part of the seventeenth

century.

The undergraduates in early times were much younger than the men of the

present day. The statutes prescribed that the oath should not be

required from scholars who were under sixteen years of age; the frequent

occurrence of _non juratus_ in the admission entry of a scholar shows

that many came to the College before that age. Probably the average age

was about sixteen; the idea being that after the seven years' residence

required for the M.A. degree they would be of the proper age to present

themselves for ordination. Those under eighteen years of age might be

publicly whipped in the Hall for breaches of discipline.

Students from distant parts of England probably resided continuously in

College from the time they entered it until they took their degrees. The

statutes of King Henry VIII. contemplate a period of some relaxation at

Christmas; providing that each Fellow in turn should be "Lord" at

Christmas, and prepare dialogues and plays to be acted by members of the

College between Epiphany and Lent. The brazier in the Hall seems to have

been kept burning in the evening about Christmas time; of this practice

a curious relic survived until comparatively lately, it being the custom

to leave a few gas-jets burning in the Hall until midnight from St.

John's Day (December 27) until Twelfth Night.

There were three classes of students. The Fellow Commoners, sons of

noblemen or wealthy land-owners, who sat at the High Table, or, as it

was phrased, were in Fellows' commons. Some came in considerable state.

In 1624 the Earl of Arundel and Surrey sent his two sons, Lord

Maltravers and Mr. William Howard, to the College. The Earl's chaplain,

or secretary, in making arrangements for their coming, wrote to request

that they should have one chamber in the College, with a "pallett for

the gromes of their chamber"; the rest of "his lordships company, being

two gentlemen, a grome of his stable and a footman, may be lodged in the

towne near the College." At this period the Second Court had been built,

and the accommodation for residence thus somewhat greater than in

Elizabethan times. The Fellow Commoner wore a gown ornamented with gold

lace, and a cap with a gold tassel. The last Fellow Commoner at St.

John's to wear this dress was the present Admiral Sir Wilmot Hawksworth

Fawkes.

The next class in order of status were the Pensioners--men who paid

their expenses without assistance from the College, sons of middle-class

parents. In times of which we have any definite record this was the most

numerous class in College. Lastly, we have the sizars. A sizar was

definitely attached to a Fellow or Fellow Commoner; he was not exactly a

servant, but made himself generally useful. For example, those members

of the College who absented themselves from the University sermon were

in the eighteenth century fined sixpence, and the sizars were expected

to mark the absentees. The sizar at Cambridge had, however, always a

better status than the servitor at Oxford, and in the days when

scholarships were strictly limited as to locality, a sizarship was

something of the nature of what at the present day we should describe as

an entrance scholarship or exhibition, the assistance given consisting

in a reduction of expenses rather than in actual direct emolument. At

the present time there is no difference in status among members of the

College; the foundation scholars, however, having special seats in

Chapel and a separate table in Hall if they choose to make use of it.

Until 1882 the condition of celibacy attached to all fellowships in the

College; Queen Elizabeth held strong views on the matter, even

discouraging the marriage of Masters. The necessity of taking orders was

somewhat relaxed in 1860. The system had its advantages--it tended to

produce promotion; for the natural inclination of mankind to marry,

vacated fellowships; the disadvantage was that men with a real taste for

study or teaching had no certain career before them. The question of

allowing Fellows to marry was raised in the eighteenth century, but met

with little support and much opposition. Even in the middle of the

nineteenth century a University Commission inclined to the view that

celibacy was inseparable from the collegiate system.

[Illustration: THE "BRIDGE OF SIGHS"]

The clerical restriction had the effect of chiefly confining selection

to College offices to those who were in orders. These in due course

went off to benefices in the gift of the College, these acting as a

species of pension. One form of benefaction frequently bestowed by past

members was the gift of an advowson; one or two benefactors left

estates, the revenues from which were to accumulate, and with the sums

so raised advowsons were to be purchased. Presentation to livings went

by seniority of standing, and this practice, with the restriction on

marriage, gave rise to the belief, still prevalent in many parishes

where the College is patron, that the College on a vacancy always

chooses for the next incumbent "the oldest bachelor." It seems probable,

without any minute statistical inquiry, that most of the Fellows left

the College before the age of forty. A few remained on for life.

It is difficult now to reconstruct a picture of the High Table, made up

as it was for many years of a group of middle-aged or elderly men, with

a considerable admixture of youthful Fellow Commoners. During the

eighteenth century the proportion of Fellow Commoners was probably from

one-fourth to one-third of those dining together, and constraint on both

sides must have been almost inevitable. The terms "don" and

"donnishness" seem to have acquired their uncomplimentary meaning about

this period. The precise significance of "don" is not easy to express

concisely; the most felicitous is perhaps that of the Oxford _Shotover

Papers_, where we read that don means, in Spain, a gentleman; in

England, a Fellow. The abolition of the Fellow Commoner was perhaps

chiefly due to the rise of the democratic spirit and a general dislike

of privilege, but there are other grounds for welcoming it.

Of the individuals who make up the stream of youthful life which has

ebbed and flowed through the College gate there is but little official

record. An Admonition Book exists, in which more than a century ago

those who were punished for graver offences against discipline signed

the record of their sentence and promised amendment. One youth admits

over a trembling signature that he was "admonished by the Master, before

the Seniors, for keeping strangers in my chamber till twelve o' the

clock, and disturbing the Master by knocking at his gate in an

irreverent manner at that hour for the keys of the gate." When the

College gate was closed it may be explained that the keys were placed in

the Master's keeping. We are, however, left in ignorance of what passed

in that chamber until the midnight hour. Yet no doubt the student in

past days had his amusements as well as his successor of the present

day--rougher perhaps, but not less agreeable to him.

In Bishop Fisher's statutes archery was encouraged as a pastime, and we

know from Ascham's writings that he indulged in it. In the sixteenth

century the College built a tennis-court for the use of its members.

John Hall, who entered the College in 1646, recommended "shittlecock" as

fit for students--"it requires a nimble arme with quick and waking eye."

We hear of horse matches and cock-fighting, but in terms of disapproval.

Football is mentioned in 1574, when the Vice-Chancellor directed that

scholars should only play upon their own College ground. In 1595 "the

hurtful and unscholarly exercise of football" was forbidden, except

within each College and between members of the same College. Certain

general orders for the discipline of the undergraduates, which gave rise

to much controversy about 1750, forbade cricket between the hours of

nine and twelve in the morning. In 1763 the Vice-Chancellor required

that no scholar, of whatever rank, should be present at bull-baiting. We

read in the eighteenth century of "schemes" or water-parties on the

river, but these appear to have been more of the nature of picnics than

exercises of skill. Riding was probably very common, the student

arriving on his nag, perhaps selling it and using the proceeds as a

start in his new life. The phrase "Hobson's choice" took its rise from

the rule in the livery stables of Hobson the carrier that a man who

hired a hack had to take the one that stood nearest to the stable door.

In later days stage-coaches supplied a more regular means of

conveyance. Students leaving Cambridge for the North betook themselves

to Huntingdon, and were housed at the George Inn there till places could

be found for them in the coaches. The landlord of the George sending

over to Cambridge to let it be known that one batch were gone and that

another might come over.

Traditions linger in parishes round Cambridge that the University

"gentlemen" used certain fields or commons for the purpose of riding

races; the Cottenham steeplechases are presumably a survival of this

practice. Shooting and coursing, with a little hunting, came into vogue

at the end of the eighteenth century.

The rise and organisation of athletic sports as an essential element of

College life would require a bulky history in itself. The first to take

definite form was rowing. The historic boat club of the college is the

Lady Margaret Boat Club; this was founded in the October term of 1825.

The actual founder of the club seems to have been the Hon. Richard John

Le Poer Trench, a son of the second Earl of Clancarty. Trench afterwards

became a captain in the 52nd Regiment, and died 12th August 1841. The

club was the first to start an eight-oared boat on the Cam, though some

Trinity men had a four-oar on the river a short time before the Lady

Margaret was started. Among the first members of the club were William

Snow and Charles Merivale, afterwards Dean of Ely. Trench acted as

stroke of the original first boat crew in the Lent Term of 1826. There

were at first no regular races, but impromptu trials of speed with other

crews frequently took place. In 1827 the University Boat Club was

started, and regular bumping races begun. The first challenge to Oxford

was determined on at a meeting of the University Boat Club held 20th

February 1829, when it was resolved: "That Mr. Snow, of St. John's, be

requested to write immediately to Mr. Staniforth, Christ Church, Oxford,

proposing to make up a University Match." The match was made up, and the

race rowed at Henley on 10th June 1829, and from this the annual

boat-race between Oxford and Cambridge takes its rise. Snow acted as

stroke of the Cambridge boat, George Augustus Selwyn, successively

Bishop of New Zealand and Lichfield, rowed "seven," and Charles Merivale

"four." Snow (afterwards Strahan) became a banker, and died at Florence

4th July 1886. In after years when, from 1861 to 1869 inclusive, Oxford

had uniformly beaten Cambridge, the Lady Margaret supplied the late John

H. D. Goldie to break the spell and restore hope and confidence to

Cambridge crews. Thus the College club has taken an important part in

the establishment and maintenance of Cambridge rowing. Two verses of the

College boat song run as follows:--

"Mater regum Margareta

Piscatori dixit laeta

'Audi quod propositum;

Est remigium decorum

Suavis strepitus remorum

Ergo sit Collegium.'

* * * * *

Sic Collegium fundatum

Et Johannis nomen datum

Margareta domina,

Ergo remiges gaudendum

Triumphandum et canendum

In saeclorum secula."

So that, if we can trust the historic insight of the author (Mr. T. R.

Glover), the intentions of the foundress have been duly carried out.

The uniform of the club was at first much what it is now, a white jersey

with pink stripes; with this was worn a jacket of scarlet flannel,

popularly known as a "blazer"--a name which has passed into the English

language as descriptive of the coloured jackets of all clubs. It is said

that some one, whose feeling for analogy was stronger than for decorum,

described the surplice as "the blazer of the Church of England."

Organised cricket clubs, athletic clubs, and football clubs grew up, and

in process of time clubs for the pursuit of every kind of athletic

exercise have been started. Originally each club in College had a

subscription, paid by its members, towards the expenses of the special

game. About twenty years ago all the clubs in St. John's were united

into one club--"The Amalgamation." The subscription to this entitles a

member to join in any of the recognised games. The funds are

administered by a committee consisting of the representatives of those

interested in the different games, and grants made from the general fund

towards the expenses of each game. The presence of a few senior members

of the College on the committee provides the continuity so difficult to

maintain with the short-lived generations of undergraduate life. The

College provides the ground for the cricket, football, and lawn-tennis

clubs, while through the generosity of members of the College of all

standings a handsome boat-house has recently been built on the river.

The College also possesses flourishing musical and debating societies,

and from time to time clubs arise for literary and social purposes,

dying out and being refounded with great persistence.

In another sphere of work the College has taken a leading part. St.

John's was the first College in Cambridge to start a mission in

London--the Lady Margaret Mission in Walworth. Preaching in the College

Chapel on 28th January 1883, the Rev. William Allen Whitworth, a Fellow

of the College, then Vicar of St. John's, Hammersmith, afterwards

Incumbent of All Saints', Margaret Street, suggested that the College

should support a mission in some neglected district of London. The

matter took form a little later in the year, and since then the College

Mission has been a College institution. Members of the College visiting

the mission district, and visitors from Walworth coming for an annual

outing, including a cricket match, in August.

Another flourishing institution is the College magazine, _The Eagle_.

Founded in the year 1858, it has maintained its existence for nearly

fifty years, being now the oldest of College magazines. It has numbered

among its contributors many who have subsequently found a wider field

and audience: some of the earliest efforts of Samuel Butler, author of

_Erewhon_, are to be found in its pages.

* * * * *

I now bring my sketch of the College history to a close. I have

endeavoured, within the prescribed limits, to give an outline of the

corporate life of an ancient and famous foundation. In writing it two

classes of readers have been borne in mind: the visitor who, within a

short compass, may wish to learn something more than can be picked up by

an inspection of the buildings; members of the College who feel a lively

interest in the habits and pursuits of those who have preceded them. I

have, perhaps, thought more of the latter than of the former class.

Members of the College have always been distinguished for a certain

independence of thought and adherence to principle, not always guided

by motives of mere worldly prudence; they have always been noted for

that strong corporate feeling which finds expression in the words of

Viscount Falkland's letter, before alluded to: "I still carry about with

me an indelible character of affection and duty to that Society, and an

extraordinary longing for some occasion of expressing that affection and

that duty."

To one who has spent much of his life in the service of the institution

to which he owes so much, the words of the Psalmist (a Scot naturally

quotes the version endeared to him by early association) seem to put the

matter concisely--

"For in her rubbish and her stones

thy servants pleasure take;

Yea, they the very dust thereof

do favour for her sake."

INDEX

Adams, J. C., 16, 25, 26, 29, 82

Admonition Book, 100

Armorial Bearings, 2

Arrowsmith, J., 57

Ascham, R., 19, 23, 44

Ashton, H., 19

Baker, T., 28, 32, 61

Balsham, Hugo de, 36

Baronsdale, W., 50

Barwick, J., 31

Bateson, W. H., 81

Beale, W., 56

"Blazer," 104

Blunt, J. J., 22

Boat Club, 102

Bohun, H., 47

"Bridge of Sighs," 8, 10

Briggs, H., 51

Brown, "Capability," 10

Bull-baiting, 101

Burghley, Lord, 18, 48

Carey, V., 28

Catton, T., 70

Caxton, 31

Celibacy, 97

Chapel, New, 13-17

Chapel, Old, 4, 13

Charles I., 26, 30, 52, 56, 86

Charles II., 31

Cheke, Sir J., 44

Churchill, C., 70, 72

Clarkson, T., 26

Clayton, R., 49

Clive, R. H., 22

College Leases, 91

Combination Room, 5, 23, 25, 27

Commons, 43, 90

Corn Rents, 91

Cricket, 101

Cromwell, O., 56, 63

Cromwell, T., 29, 30

Dallam, R., 22

Dawson, J., 70

Denman, T., 71

Digby, E., 48

Dividend, 92

_Eagle, The_, 106

Eagle Close, 10

Edward VI., 45

Elizabeth, Queen, 46, 47

Estates, 93

Examinations, 24, 69

Fairfax, T., 31, 56, 62

Falkland, Viscount, 18, 62, 107

Fawkes, Sir W. H., 96

Fellow Commoners, 66, 96, 97, 99

Fisher, John, 37

Floods, 7

Football, 101

Forster, T., 63

Frost, H., 35

Ganton, R., 70

Gilbert, W., 18, 50, 51

Glover, T. R., 104

Goldie, J. H. D., 103

Gower, H., 7, 59, 60

Gunning, P., 57

Gwyn, O., 52, 62

Hall, The, 23

Hare, Sir R., 25

Hawksmoor, N., 8

Heberden, W., 73

Henrietta Maria, Queen, 26

Henry VII., 38

Henry VIII., 18, 38, 41, 45, 86

Herrick, R., 63

Herschel, Sir J. F. W., 25, 26, 82

High Altar, 46

Hill, R., 84

Hoare, H., 16

Hoghton, General, 70

Hopton, Sir I., 63

Horne Tooke, 72

Hospital of St. John, 14, 35

Howard, Lord Thomas, 3

Hutchinson, H., 8

Infirmary, 17

James I., 26, 49, 52

James II., 58

Jenkin, R., 61, 64

Kennedy, B. H., 25

Kikuchi, D., 83

Kirke White, H., 4, 20

Kitchen, 32

Knox, E., 17

Knox, John, 17

Knox, N., 17

Labyrinth, 17, 18, 94

Lady Margaret, 1, 2, 37

Laud, 30

Leases, 92

Library, 25, 27, 28

Lillechurch, 30, 41

Linacre, T., 49

Liveing, G. D., 25

Longworth, R., 47, 89

Ludlam, W., 70

Martyn, H., 71

Mary, Queen, 46

Mason, W., 72

Master's Lodge, 15, 25

Mayor, J. E. B., 25, 61

Mengs, R. A., 22

Merivale, C., 102, 103

Metcalfe, N., 20, 40, 42

Mission, Walworth, 105

Mortuary Roll, 30

Mossom, D., 63

Newcome, J., 31

Nonjurors, 59

Norton, F., 72

Oates, Titus, 63

Okeley, F., 84

Organ, 22

Ospringe, 41

Palmer, E. H., 25

Palmerston, Viscount, 71

Parsons, Hon. C. A., 83

Paul's Cross, 43

Peckover, Dr. A., 39

Pennington, Sir I., 90

Percy, A., 40

Peterhouse, 36, 37

Pilkington, J., 89

Powell, Sir F. S., 16

Powell, W. S., 69

Powis, Earl, 21

_Praeter_, 91

Prior, M., 32, 63

Reform, University, 80

Registers, 61, 62

Reyner, G. F., 16

Rickman, T., 8

Rowing, 102

St. John's Street, 16

Scott, A. J., 71, 72

Scott, Sir G. G., 15, 17

Scott, J. O., 22

Seaton, G., 55

Selwyn, G. A., 26, 103

Selwyn, W., 15

Seven Bishops, 58

Shittlecock, 101

Shorton, R., 40

Shrewsbury, Countess of, 5, 19, 28

Sizar, 97

Smith, R., 50

Smith, W., 73

Snow, W., 102, 103

Stag Staircase, 4

Stage Plays, 23, 95

Staincoat, 5

Stankard, 5

Statues, 18

Statutes, 42, 43, 61, 74, 79, 81

Strafford, Lord, 18, 56, 62

Tatham, R., 22, 80

Taylor, B., 63

Taylor, C., 82

Thomas, Sir N., 25

Townshend, Marquis, 70

Trench, R. J. Le P., 102

Trinity College, 44

Tuckney, A., 57

Tutorial System, 77

Tyrrell, W., 26

Victoria, Queen, 18

Washington, Geo., 64

Whitaker, W., 48

Whitgift, J., 48

Whitworth, W. A., 105

Whytehead, T., 22

Wilberforce, W., 26

Wilderness, The, 9, 10

Williams, John, 7, 18, 25, 27, 28, 29, 52

Wood, J., 20, 78

Wordsworth, W., 25, 26, 32

Wren, Sir C., 7

Wren's Bridge, 8, 9

THE END

Printed by BALLANTYNE, HANSON & CO.

Edinburgh & London

* * * * *

TRANSCRIBERS' NOTES

General: Spelling of words in quotations has been preserved.

General: Corrections to punctuation have not been individually

documented.

Page 51: logarithims corrected to logarithms (second occurrence)

St. John's College, Cambridge · 第 8 / 8 章