WEARING GLOVES IN PRESENCE OF ROYALTY.

(Vol. i., p. 366.; Vol. ii., pp. 165. 467.; Vol. v., p. 102.).

MR. SINGER'S explanation (Vol. ii., p. 165.) is simple, and, I believe,

correct. The covered hands might be considered as discourteous as a

covered head: but why should uncovering either be a mark of respect? The

solution of this question seems to me of some curiosity, and may perhaps

be to many of your readers of some novelty. These and most other modern

forms of salutation and civility are derived from chivalry, or at least

from war, and they all betoken some deference, as from a conquered

person to the conqueror; just as in private life we still continue to

sign ourselves the "very humble servants" of our correspondent.

The _uncovered_ head was simply the head _unarmed_; the helmet being

removed, the party was at mercy. So the hand _ungloved_ was the hand

_ungauntleted_, and to this day it is an incivility to shake hands with

gloves on. Shaking hands itself was but a token of truce, in which the

parties took hold each of the other's _weapon-hand_, to make sure

against treachery. So also a gentleman's _bow_ is but an offer of the

neck to the stroke of the adversary: so the lady's _curtsey_ is but the

form of going _on her knees_ for mercy. This general principle is

marked, as it ought naturally to be, still more strongly in the case of

military salutes. Why is a discharge of guns a _salute_? Because it

leaves the guns empty, and at the mercy of the opponent. And this is so

true, that the saluting with blank cartridge is a modern invention.

Formerly salutes were fired by discharging the cannonballs, and there

have been instances in which the compliment has been nearly fatal to the

visitor whom it meant to honour. When the _officer_ salutes, he points

his drawn sword to the ground; and the salute of the troops is, even at

this day, called "_presenting arms_,"--that is, presenting them to be

taken.

There are several other details both of social and military salutation

of all countries which might be produced; but I have said enough to

indicate the principle.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 120, February 14, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 80 / 152 题