NOTE ON THE COINS OF VABALATHUS.

(Vol. iv., pp. 255. 427. 491.)

Since the publication of my last note on the coins of Vabalathus, I have

obtained the _Lettres Numismatiques_ du Baron Marchant, 1850. The

original edition being very rare, and I believe only three hundred of

this one having been printed, I have thought it might be as well to

record some additional information from it in your pages. Marchant

reads, "Vabalathus Verenda Concessione Romanorum Imperatore Medis datus

Rex." It is needless to remark on this, further than on the more ancient

interpretations. He points out that the Greek letters, or rather

numerals, show the coins to have been struck in a country where Greek,

if not the popular language, was that of the government, along with

Latin. This country was necessarily an Oriental one, and I think this

observation would rather lead to the inference that the word VCRIMDR,

occupying the place usually filled by Cæsar, Augustus, ϹΕΒΑϹΩϹ,

&c., might be an Oriental title, though expressed in Latin letters.

Millin, to whom he had communicated his view, thought correctly "que ça

sentait un peu le père Harduin," and it was only published in the

posthumous edition of his works. De Gauley has published coins struck by

the Arabs in Africa, which have Latin legends, in some of which the

Arabic titles are given in Latin letters. The Emir Musa Ben Nasir

appears thus, MυSE. F. NASIR. AMIRA. The coins of Vabalathus

offer a more ancient example of the same. I have given what appears to

me the clue, and I hope it will be followed out by Orientalists. M. de

Longperier, in his annotations to the 28th letter, shows that the

name Ἀθηνᾶς is derived from Ἀθηνόδωρος, and appears to

think ΑΘΗΝΟΥ or ΑΘΗΝΥ the genitive of ΑΘΗΝΑϹ. The difficulty, he says,

is, that names in ᾶς have, in the Alexandrian dialect, the genitive

ᾶτος. He does not appear to have noticed the reading as

ΥΙοϹ (or ΟΥ as Ο ΥΙοϹ?), which appears to me to remove the difficulty,

but also to obviate the necessity of the name Ἀθηνᾶς at all. He

remarks on the similarity of name between Αθηνας, Αθηνατος,

and Odenathus.

"If," he says, "we examine comparatively Vabalath (ΟΥΑΒΑΛΑΘ)

and Odenath, or rather Odanath, as in Zosimus, we see

an analogous formation; Ou-baalat, Ou-tanat, the feminine of Baal

or Bel, and of Tan, Dan, or Zan, preceded by the same syllable.

Baalat is a Scripture form (Jos. xix. 44.; 1 Kings ix. 48.; Paral.

ii. viii. 6.). De Gauley has found the name of Tanat in a

Phoenician inscription, and Lenormant remarks that this feminine

form of Zan, or Jupiter, corresponds to Athéné. Thus Ou-tanat is

the equivalent of Athenas, consequently of Athenodorus."

Vabalathus is thus, if these etymological considerations be correct, the

son of Odenathus. Longperier proposes to read ΕΡΩΤΑϹ for ϹΡΩΙΑϹ,

and to consider this the equivalent of Herodes, mentioned by

Trebellius Pollio. With all deference to M. de Longperier,

I venture to oppose the following objections. First, Some coins read

ϹΡΙΑϹ, which would read ΕΡΤΑϹ on his principle. Since, in

the coins of Zenobia, Vabalathus, and those bearing the name of

Athenodorus, whether struck by Vabalathus or not, is not material at

present, we find the names at full length, not omitting the vowels, it

is natural to suppose that the same would here take place, if the word

really were the name of Herodes. To explain, if we found

ΖΗΝΟΒΙΑ and ΖΝΟΒΙΑ, ΑΘΗΝΟΔΩΡΟϹ and ΑΘΝΔΡΟϹ, or similar contractions,

we might consider ΕΡΩΤΑϹ and ΕΡΤΑϹ identical. Secondly, On my

specimens of this coin I find the ι in this word distinctly formed,

and the Τ in the next word ΑΥΤ _as_ distinct. All authors have read this

letter ι, although varying in the rest. Thirdly, On the obverse

of these specimens the Ε is larger and more open than the Ϲ,

as may be seen in the conclusion ...ΝΟϹ . ϹΕΒ, where it is preceded

by two sigmas, and is easy to compare with them. We should naturally

expect to find it having the same form on the reverse, if the

reading ΕΡΩΤΑϹ were correct. But it is of the same size as the

other letters, on my specimens at least. I need not say that

there is no trace of the central stroke.

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 120, February 14, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 39 / 152 题