MILITARY BLUNDER--UNCALLED-FOR BLOODSHED.

Even at the moment of this writing, it is not difficult to perceive

that a fearful blunder has been committed by the Governor and his

ill-timed military advisers. It is impossible for us to conceive

that the action of the railroad strikers, taking the worst view of

either side of the case, justified the calling out of the military.

Time should have been allowed for a respectful parley between

parties; time for the railroad company to properly consider the

grievances complained of in the respectful petition of the

strikers, and time for the railroad employés to act in response.

There is tyranny in this country worse than anything ever known in

Russia, and it is time we should get at the gist of it.

Strikes are common occurrences, but it appears that it is only when

the "great monopoly," the hated company, which discriminates

against the interests of Pittsburgh and western Pennsylvania, is

subjected to one of these strikes, that the military are ordered

out, and that, too, without a moment's consideration, us though the

Pennsylvania railroad was more important than the peace and order

and the lives of half the citizens of this State.

There is no use disguising the matter. The people of this city

sympathize with the strikers. They are incensed beyond measure,

with the cold, corrupt legislation which has fostered the colder

and more corrupt organization known as the Pennsylvania Railroad

Company. But we cannot disguise the legal technicalities which

appear to brace up that company as against the people. All that we

say and care to know is, that a fearful blunder was made by the

constituted authorities, who from the Governor down to General

Pearson and Sheriff Fife, appeared to be only the willing tools of

the giant oppressor.

We hold that the reckless haste of General Pearson and Governor

Hartranft makes them the prime ringleaders of what promises to be

the bloodiest riot with which the Commonwealth has ever been

visited. The insane policy of calling Philadelphia troops to this

city to quell a domestic quarrel is reprehensible beyond degree.

Hartranft and Pearson have only added fuel to the flames, that may

not be satisfied till the lives of hundreds of militia and citizens

are sacrificed. But while we counsel peace, it is only the duty of

journalists to fix the blame where it belongs, and therefore we

arraign before the board of public opinion General Pearson, Sheriff

Fife, Thomas Scott, and Governor Hartranft, and their aiders and

abettors for the murder of our fellow-citizens, who were

slaughtered by the Philadelphia militia.

Whether the officer commanding was drunk or crazy when he ordered

the Philadelphia soldiers to fire into our own Nineteenth regiment,

whereby one member was killed, it is a matter that should engage

the minds of a military court. But such recklessness and

mismanagement is only part and parcel of the great blunder of which

we complain.

The railroad magnates claim and protest their inability to carry on

their business with profit without the much vexed reduction. All

the employés can say is, we must starve at these wages. Now,

granting that on one side or the other there must be suffering,

which, is it equable, should suffer? But the concession can only be

made for the sake of casuistic argument. The railroads affirm that

they cannot meet expenses without curtailing salaries to the extent

that has caused this present trouble. Let us take the case of the

Pennsylvania Company. In this instance, we could show some other

method of escaping the difficulty. Look at this:

J. N. McCullough, $12,000 per annum.

William Thaw, 10,000 per annum.

Thomas D. Messier, 10,000 per annum.

John Scott, (solicitor,) 10,000 per annum.

H. H. Houston, (in no recognized position,) 10,000 per annum.

Contrast this with the ninety cents of the poor brakeman. But then,

what is the poor laboring man? Let the following real occurrence

tell:

Report of the Committee Appointed to Investigate the Railroad Riots in July, 1877 Read in the Senate and House of Representatives May 23, 1878 · 第 166 / 186 题