On reference to Monteith, I find the following passage:--

"What is very remarkable in this is, that the Jews, who

crucified the Son of God, by whom Kings reign, took then

occasion of the conjuncture which seemed favourable to them.

They presented a petition to the Council of War, who crucified

Him again in the person of the King, His Vicegerent in the

kingdoms over which God had set him. By their petition, they

requested that the act of their banishment might be repealed

and _that they might have St. Paul's Church for their

synagogue_, for which, _and the library of Oxford_, wherewith

they desired to begin their traffic again, they offered five

hundred thousand pounds, but the Council of War would have

eight."--Monteiths's _Hist. of the Troubles of Great Britain_,

p. 473.

I conclude that the author of the _Status of the Jews_, by omitting to

notice the alleged desire of the Jews to obtain St. Paul's Cathedral,

considered that the acrimonious statements of Monteith were not borne

out by accredited or unprejudiced authorities; for it is but justice

to state, it has been admitted by some of our most eminent critics,

that Mr. Egan's book on the Jews displays as dispassionate and

impartial a review of their condition in this country as it evinces a

profundity of historical and legal research.

"H.M.A.'s" second question I am unable to answer, not being

sufficiently versed in the religious dogmas of the Jews.

Notes and Queries, Number 29, May 18, 1850 · 第 56 / 102 题