Section III.—PERSONAL LIBERTY.—RESISTANCE TO AN ARMED FORCE.

The act was done in the night time. After having celebrated the Supper,

Jesus had conducted his disciples to the Mount of Olives. He prayed

fervently; but they fell asleep.

Jesus awakes them, with a gentle reproof for their weakness, and warns

them that the moment is approaching. “Rise, let us be going; behold he is

at hand that doth betray me.” Matt. xxvi. 46.

Judas was not alone; in his suite there was a kind of ruffian band, almost

entirely composed of servants of the high priest, but whom Mr. Salvador

honours with the title of the _legal soldiery_. If in the crowd there were

any Roman _soldiers_, they were there as spectators, and without having

been legally called on duty; for the Roman commanding officer, Pilate, had

not yet heard the affair spoken of.

This personal seizure of Jesus had so much the appearance of a forcible

arrest, an illegal act of violence, that his disciples made preparation to

repel force by force.

Malchus, the insolent servant of the high priest, having shown himself the

most eager to rush upon Jesus, Peter, not less zealous for his own master,

cut off the servant’s right ear.

This resistance might have been continued with success, if Jesus had not

immediately interfered. But what proves that Peter, even while causing

bloodshed, was not resisting a _legal order_, a _legal judgment_ or

decree, (which would have made his resistance an act of _rebellion by an

armed force against a judicial order_,) is this—that he was not arrested,

either at the moment or afterwards, at the house of the high priest, to

which he followed Jesus, and where he was most distinctly recognised by

the maid servant of the high priest, and even by a relative of Malchus.

Jesus alone was arrested; and although he had not individually offered any

active resistance, and had even restrained that of his disciples, they

bound him as a malefactor; which was a criminal degree of rigour, since

for the purpose of securing a single man by a numerous band of persons

armed with swords and staves it was not necessary. “Be ye come out as

against a thief with swords and staves?” Luke xxii. 52.

An Examination of the Testimony of the Four Evangelists, by the Rules of Evidence Administered in Courts of Justice With an Account of the Trial of Jesus · 第 3 / 11 章