dogma for another than the introduction of the dogmatic habit; but in
reality a much wider and more salutary reform was involved. In the first
place, the new authorities were actually much more valuable than the
old, and in the second place the new dogma, instead of being merely
conservative and petrifying, was found to be innovating and inspiriting
in its tendency. Galen himself was not so strictly a Galenist as his
followers. His works shew (in spite of his undeniable and fatal love of
system and formula) enterprise and originality, with frequent reference
to observation, and even experiment. They led also inevitably to a study
of Hippocrates, a writer far more unsystematic, and free from the vice
of formalism, whose sagacity and power of observation give his works a
perennial freshness. Finally, the revival of the ancient classics led
to the revival also of the sciences on which modern medicine rests, and
which were destined to overthrow all the dogmatic systems, viz. Anatomy
and the knowledge of Drugs.
Haller, speaking of the progress of anatomy in the 16th century,
attributes it to two chief causes, the revival of the works of Galen, and
the invention of printing. Not less did Botany and Pharmacology take a
new departure from the works of Dioscorides. It would thus appear that
the task of Linacre and the scholars, really though not in appearance,
contributed to the scientific movement which was the turning-point in
modern medicine. This movement was the special work of the 16th century.
The time had not yet come for the reform in practical medicine which
the progress of the sciences rendered possible, and which was reserved
to be the special glory of the next age. But a definite and brilliant
service was rendered to the progress of medicine by the scholars of the
Renaissance, among whom no name is better entitled to be held in grateful
remembrance than that of Thomas Linacre.
It would be out of place here to enter into any general estimate of the
value of Galen’s writings. They are of immense bulk, and few persons
in modern times can claim to have done more than dip into them. But
this massiveness and bulk were perhaps even among the features which
caused his works to be held in such high estimation. They formed a vast
encyclopædia in which all the ancient medical lore was comprised. A very
large part of the works even of Hippocrates may be said to be contained
in Galen, and many older writers are now only known through the account
which Galen has given of them. The Galenical collection embraces anatomy,
physiology, practical medicine, and what we should now call Hygiene, as
well as dissertations on the history and sects of medicine, with many
curious anecdotes and allusions to the manners and opinions of his time.
We hear also of works on logic and philosophy which are almost entirely
lost.
This encyclopædic knowledge was classified with a systematic minuteness
and a delusive appearance of scientific precision which especially fitted
Galen to be a ruler of thought in ages when men were willing to accept an
intellectual despotism. The disciple of Galen had a formula to explain
every disease, and a rule for the treatment of every case.
What his general principles were is shewn very clearly in the work now
reprinted, which is rather physiological or physical than strictly
medical. In it we find developed the theory of humours and temperaments,
which formed the physiological basis of Galen’s system of medicine;
and which, conveyed through many popular medical works to the lay
public, entered largely into the current philosophy of the time. Hence
Linacre speaks of this work as not less necessary to philosophers than
to physicians. Some knowledge of these ideas is indispensable for
understanding many allusions and metaphors in English writers of the
Elizabethan age. Nay more, a great part of it has passed into our common
language. Such words as ‘_humour_’ in its many acceptations, and many
compounds, _temperament_, _temper_, _choler_, _melancholy_ and others
derived all their original significance from the place which they held
in the Galenical system. It is perhaps not too much to suppose that this
very version may have been among the sources whence such writers as
Elyot (who was a pupil of Linacre) in his _Castell of Helth_, Bright,
the predecessor of Burton, in his _Treatise of Melancholie_, and later,
Walkington, in the fantastic book called _The Optick Glasse of Humors_,
obtained the ideas which, popularized by them, became the common property
of scholars and literary men. From this point of view, our treatise is
not without importance in the history of English literature.
The little treatise at the end, _De Inæquali intemperie_, is no part of
the work which precedes it; but is apparently appended by Linacre to shew
Galen’s application of his physiological system to certain points in
pathology or the theory of disease.
It is only necessary to say in conclusion that this version of the
_De Temperamentis_ appears to have been the first ever made in Latin,
or at least published. Orlandi (in 1722) speaks of a previous edition
with Linacre’s name, published at Venice in the year 1498, but this
statement is certainly erroneous. All the enquiries of Linacre’s learned
biographer, Dr Noble Johnson, and of the present editor, have failed to
establish the existence of any such edition, and indeed the preface to
this edition is of itself enough to refute the story. The treatise _De
inæquali intemperie_ on the other hand had been previously translated
into Latin, though not by Linacre. It is included in a collection of
Latin versions of many of the works of Galen and others, translated
by Georgius Valla, of Piacenza. This was printed at Venice in 1498;
and hence, no doubt, the source of the confusion between Valla’s
translation of this treatise and Linacre’s translation of this and the
_De Temperamentis_. I have seen the third edition of Valla’s collection
published at Pavia 1516; the version of this treatise there given is
quite different from Linacre’s. Dr Johnson is responsible for the
statement that a second edition of both was published during Linacre’s
lifetime, of which a presentation copy on vellum given to Henry VIII. is
in the Bodleian Library. But an examination of this copy has convinced
me that it is of the same edition, though an error in the printing of
the last six leaves makes it appear different. According to the British
Museum Catalogue a second edition in 24mo. was printed at London in 1527.
The version was frequently reprinted on the continent, either alone
or as a part of the collected Latin editions of Galen’s works; but no
subsequent edition has appeared in this country.
J. F. PAYNE.
LIST OF LINACRE’S PUBLISHED WORKS.
1. Translation of _Proclus de Sphærâ_. Venice, by Aldus Romanus, 1499.
Folio.
2. Translation of Galen, _De Sanitate tuendâ_. Paris, Gulielmus Rubeus,
1517. Folio.
3. Translation of Galen, _Methodus Medendi_. Paris, Desiderius Maheu,
1519. Folio.
4. Translation of Galen, _De Temperamentis et de inæquali intemperie_.
Cambridge, Siberch, 1521. 4to.
5. Translation of Galen, _De Naturalibus Facultatibus_. London, Richard
Pynson, 1523. 4to.
6. Translation of Galen, _De Pulsuum usû_. London, ‘in ædibus
pinsonianis,’ sine anno. 4to.
7. Translation of Galen, _De Symptomatum Differentiis et causis_. London,
Pynson, 1524. 4to.
8. _Rudimenta Grammatices._ London, ‘in ædibus pinsonianis,’ sine anno.
4to.
9. _De emendatâ structurâ Latini sermonis._ London, Pynson, 1524. 4to.
NOTES.
SOURCES OF THE BIOGRAPHY OF LINACRE.
The only separate biography of Linacre is that by Dr Noble Johnson,
a fellow of the College of Physicians, published, in 1835 after the
author’s death, under the editorship of Mr Robert Graves. From this
the biographical part of the short sketch here given has been chiefly
derived. Dr Johnson collected with great learning and industry the
contemporary notices of Linacre, as well as all that has appeared in
later writers, and investigated many manuscript authorities. It would be
ungrateful here to point out the few errors into which he has fallen,
especially as they are probably partly due to his work having been
published without the author’s personal revision. The earliest life is
either that contained in the Elogia contributed by George Lily to the
_Descriptio Britanniæ_ of Paulus Jovius, Venetiis, 1548 (also Basileæ
1578), or that given in Bale’s _Illustrium majoris Britanniæ scriptorum
summarium_. Gippeswici, 1548. Further materials are contained in Leland
(_Principum … et eruditorum etc. encomia._ London 1589) Pits (_De
Illustribus Angliæ scriptoribus_); Freind’s _History of Physic_; the
_Biographia Britannica_; Wood’s _Athenæ Oxonienses_, Bishop Tanner’s
_Bibliotheca Britannico-Hibernica_, etc. Later biographical collections,
such as Aitken’s _Biographical Memoirs of Medicine_, the _Lives of the
British Physicians_, and Dr Munk’s learned _Roll of the Royal College
of Physicians_, have added little or nothing. The present Editor has
carefully verified most of Dr Johnson’s references; and corrected or
added a few facts, but has found little to glean after so exhaustive a
worker. The latter part, however, of this short introduction owes little
to Dr Johnson. I have to thank Mr Bradshaw, the University Librarian, for
some valuable hints.
NOTES (referred to in text).
1. (Page 7). There is no reference to Linacre or Selling in the _Stemmata
Chicheleana_ or in the MS. additions made to the copy in the library of
All Souls’ College.
2. (P. 10). Procli de Sphærâ, in the Collection called _Astronomici
Veteres, Venetiis curâ Aldi Romani 1499_.
3. (P. 12). Dr Johnson quotes Pacey’s _De Fructû qui ex Doctrinâ
percipitur_. Basileæ Froben 1517, p. 76.
4. (P. 13). Calendar of Letters and Papers relating to the reign of Henry
VIII, edited by Brewer, Vol. IV., part 3, page 2874, no. 6403.
5. (P. 13). _Nicolai Leoniceni, De Plinii ac plurium aliorum in medicinâ
erroribus liber ad doctissimum virum Angelum Politianum._ Ferrariæ 1492.
Also in _Angeli Politiani et aliorum epistolæ_. Lib. II., epist. 3, 4 et
seq. (Ed. Hanoviæ 1622, page 46).
6. (P. 14). Johnson’s _Life of Linacre_, page 147. It does not appear
whence these verses are quoted, as no reference is given by Dr Johnson.
7. (P. 15). Seebohm. _The Oxford Reformers: Colet, Erasmus, and More._
2nd edition. London 1869, page 17.
8. (P. 17). _Erasmi Roterodami Moriæ encomium._ Basileæ, Froben 1521,
page 251.
(Is this passage the foundation of Mr Browning’s fine poem, “The
Grammarian’s funeral”?)
9. (P. 18). _Pauli Jovii Novocomensis episcopi Descriptio Britanniæ._
Basileæ 1571, p. 40. Elogia virorum per Georgium Lilium Britannum exarata.
10. (P. 19). Sir John Cheke:
_Joannis Cheki Angli de pronuntiatione Græcæ potissimum linguæ
disputationes cum Stephano Wintoniensi Episcopo._ Basileæ 1555, p. 176
and 281, etc. Linacre’s name is brought in as follows. Bishop Gardiner
finds fault with Cheke for too Ciceronian a style of writing (Ciceronis
grandiloquentiam ad sententias de rebus levibus atque ridiculis
inconcinne additam et accommodatam), and quotes to him Erasmus _in
Ciceronianos_ and also Linacre, who he says never admired the style of
Cicero and could not listen to it without disgust. Cheke retorts in the
manner we have quoted, “Si de acumine et celeritate ingenii disputatur
etc.—in eo si nunc viveret, tibi laudem concederet,” and makes the
curious remark that it is strange Linacre could not listen to Cicero
without disgust, when his work _De structurâ_ abounds with examples taken
from Cicero. Perhaps, Cheke suggests, he had not really neglected the
study of that writer, but through some perversity wished to be thought to
have neglected him, “ut non tam fortasse reverâ neglexerit, quam animi
quâdam morositate videri voluit neglexisse.”
11. (P. 21). The phrase quoted from Tanner, _Bibliotheca
Britannico-Hibernica_, seems to refer clearly to ordination, not merely
to collation to a benefice.
12. (P. 21). See Dr Munk. _Roll of the College of Physicians._ _2nd
edition_ 1878, page 16.
13. (P. 25). “pro ocio in quod me (honorifico collato sacerdotio) ex
negocio primus vindicasti.” Introduction to Galen, _De Naturalibus
Facultatibus_. London, 1523.
14. (P. 34). This foible of over-elaboration is discussed at great length
by Bayle in his article on Linacre in the _Dictionary_. He remarks that
though this is not a common fault with authors, it has often operated to
the prejudice of the best, and to the consequent loss of the public.
15. (P. 41). Janus Cornarius, in his introduction (dated 1535) to
_Marcellus de Medicamentis_, published in the Collection called _Medicæ
Artis Principes_. Paris, Henr. Stephanus, 1567.
[Illustration:
GALENI PERGAMENSIS
DE TEMPERAMENTIS,
ET DE INAEQVALI
INTEMPERIE LIBRI TRES
THOMA LINACRO
ANGLO INTERPRETE
Opus non medicis modo, sed et
philosophis oppido quam necessarium
nunc primum prodit in lucem
CVM GRATIA
& Priuilegio.]
SANCTISSIMO DOMINO NOSTRO PAPAE LEONI DECIMO, Thomas Linacer Medicorum
Minimus. S. D.
Non hanc tibi lucubratiunculam meam Beatissime Pater quasi tuis aptam
studiis dignamve offero, quem totum totius christianae Reip. gubernaculis
incumbere omnes scimus, sed quod studiosis eam futuram non ingratam
sperem. quibus quidquid vsui esse potest, tibi quoque fore iucundum
non dubito. Accedit quod quum recens in me collatae non vulgaris
munificentiae tuae, qua me quoque sicut reliquos quicunque te olim
comitabamur in ludum beare es dignatus, non immemorem me aliquo saltem
officii genere declarare volui: vnum hoc inter facultates meas quo id
efficere conarer literarium perspexi genus. quod et mihi cui pene praeter
literas nihil est, et tibi qui in literis es eminentissimus maxime visum
sit congruens. In quo genere Galeni hic, se obtulit libellus, breuis
omnino, sed non minus philosophis quam medicis necessarius. Qui breuitate
sua simul officium meum minus erat moraturus, simul meae in uertendo,
quantulaecunque, certe tenuis facultatis gustum aliquem tibi praebiturus.
Perexigua (fateor) res, nimisque impar quae pro tante benignitatis vel
Mnemosyno ad sacram presertim Celsitudinem tuam mittatur. Verum et cuius
ipse vicem in terris geris pauperculae mulieris duo minuta probauit: et
mola salsa litare eos, qui thura non haberent, proditum non ignoras. Sunt
sane mihi plura maioraque in manibus, quae vt primum per valetudinem et
ministerii mei officia licebit, si tibi haec non displicere intelligam,
sub nomine tuo (modo id non graueris) aedentur. Non quo iis operae
precium tibi vllum me facturum autumem, quod scilicet mihi de meo
ingeniolo sperare non licet, sed quo iis ex praefatione nominis tui, quod
merito literatis omnibus est charissimum, gratiam aliquam autoritatemque
captem. Permultum sane si qui erunt qui ex vigiliis meis fructum aliquem
percipient, Sanctitati tuae debituris, qui tam insigni beneficentia
studiorum meorum ocio consulueris. Deum opt. Max. precor diu te nobis
seruet atque incoepta tua omnia secundet. Londini. Anno Christianae
salutis. M. D. XXI. Nonis Septembris.
ELENCHVS SEQVENTIS OPERIS.
Pro Elenchi huius intelligentia, scire licet, quum in singulis huius
codicis pagellis viginti septem versus contineantur: diuisis iis in tres
nouenarios: per A significatur eorum primus. per B. secundus. et per C
tertius. Sic intra nouem semper versus lector quod ex Elencho requiret,
non difficulter inueniet. Modo qui breuissimus labor erit, singulis libri
chartis numerum adscribere velit.
A
Animans in summo calidum humidum frigidum aut siccum nullum
esse. folio primo, pagina. i. C
Autumni incommodum. fo. vii. i. B
Autumni qualitas. fo. eodem. i. C
Autumni et veris collatio. fo. eodem. ii. A
Animalia quomodo veteribus calida et humida sint dicta. fo. x.
ii. A
Atrae bilis temperies. fo. xxxiii. i. C
Animal calidum et humidum cur dixerint ueteres. fo. eodem. ii. C
Adipis et carnis variae causae. fo. xxxiiii. ii. B
Anatomica speculatio. fo. xlii. ii. C
Aristotelem de substantia formatricis virtutis dubitasse. fo.
xliiii. ii. A
Ab exiguo momento magnam fieri interdum mutationem, et eius rei
exemplum. fo. li. i. C
Archimedes. folio lii. i. B
Attendendum in sicco et humi. quid per se tale sit quid per
accidens. fo. lv. ii. B
Aliqua pati a nostro corpore magis quam agere aliqua magis
agere quam pati. omnia vero tum agere tum pati. fo. lviii. i. C
Ἀειπάθεια. folio lviii. ii. C
Aliqua primo statim vsu alterationem suam ostendere. fo. lix. i. A
Abs quibus externis iudicandum. fo. lxi. ii. B
Ad aliquid esse quicquid potestate dicitur. fo. lxiiii. ii. C
Arterias et venas partes esse compositas. fo. lxvi.
Aliter simplicem carnem aliter vniuersum musculum inaequali
temperie affectum esse. fo. lxvi.
Abscessio que melior sit que deterior. fo. lxvii.
Alterationis varietates in phlegmonis, ex quinque generibus
accidere. fo. lxviii.
Animalium quaedam conuenientes, quaedam contrarios inter se
succos habere. fo. lxx. i. B
Aliquos rigere nec tamen febricitare. Rarumque id. fo. lxxii.
B
Biliosum quod in uentriculo gignitur quo sit colore, et quo
quod in iocinore. fo. xliii. ii. A
C
Calidum, humidum, frigidum, siccum multifariam dici Aristotelem
censuisse. fo. ix. ii. C
Calidum et frigidum, humidum et siccum dici idem corpus multis
modis. fo. xiii. i. B
Calidum & frigidum non de corporibus modo, sed etiam de
qualitatibus interdum dici. eodem. ii. C
Calida, fri. hu. sic. vt substantiae, quae. fo. xv. i. B
Calida. frig. humi. sic. absolute quae. fo. xvi. ii. B
Cutem in calore & frigore medium optinere statum. fo. xxi. i. B.
Chondrosyndesmos. fo. eodem. ii. A
Calidum in aetatibus qualiter tactu sit discernendum. folio
xxix. i. A
Calorem in pueris & florentibus parem esse. fo. xxxi. i. B
Carnosi genereris species. fo. xxxii. i. A
Caro proprie, quae. folio eodem. i. A
Carnem iocinoris, lienis, pulmonis, & renum. simplicis naturae
esse. fo. eodem. ii. B
Cordis carnem non esse simplicem. fo. eodem. ii. B
Carnem ventriculi, vteri, & vesicarum propriam quandam esse.
folio eodem. ii. C
Carnis temperies. fo. xxxiii. i. A
Cartilaginis temperamentum. fo. xxxiii. i. B
Calcarium temperies. folio eodem. i. B
Carnosi qui. folio xxxiiii. ii. B
Consuetudinem esse acquisititiam naturam. fo. eo. ii. B
Calui cur. folio xxxix. i. B
Cani cur. folio eodem. ii. A
Cur calui a sincipite cani a temporibus magis fiant. fo. eodem.
ii. B
Cui maxime attendendum cum corporis temperiem iudicabimus. fo.
eodem. ii. B
Cur quibus hirtus est thorax ob idipsum aliquando reliquis
partibus dissimili sint temperamento. fo. xl. ii. C
Cutis quando sub se positarum partium temperiem indicet, &
quarum. folio xli. i. C
Considerandum etiam si quid raro accidit. fo. xlii. ii. A
Cerebri ipsius temperamentum ex quibus dignoscatur. fo. xliiii.
i. A
Causa quaedam humiditatis in carne. fo. xlvi. i. A
Considerandum esse ex quibus & in quae mutationes sint factae.
folio eodem i. B
Cur aliqua protinus, aliqua interposito tempore calefaciant.
folio l. ii. B
Calefacere omnis esse alimenti communem effectum. fo. lii. ii. A
Cur aliqua eorum quae ut alimenta comeduntur, cuti imposita
exulcerent. folio liii. ii. A
Corpora calida. frigida. hu. & sic. quaedam per se talia esse,
quedam ex accidenti. fo. lv. i. B
Cantharidas vesicam exulcerare. fo. eodem. ii. A
Commune iudicium in omnibus quae potestate sunt ex alterationis
celeritate. folio lvi. i. B
Contrarietas naturae vnde iudicanda. fo. eodem. ii. C
Cedendum aliquando esse non exactissime loquentibus. folio
lviii. ii. B
Cibi pariter & medicamenta, que. fo. lix. i. B
Calidi. frigidi. humidi. sicci. respectu nostri iudicium a
nobis certum esse posse. folio lxi. ii. A
Calor quomodo ex accidenti refrigeret. fo. lxiii. ii. B
Calidum reuma quemadmodum musculi partes inuadat. fo. lxvi.
Corporis temperies quando extrinsecus, et quando interne
alteretur. fo. lxxi.
Cur aliqui simul rigeant et febricitent. fo. eodem.
Concoctionem phlegmonis duo sequi. fo. lxvii.
D
Demonstrationis omnis principia esse quae sensui et quae
intellectui sint manifesta. fo. xxviii. ii. B
Durum et molle cum mediocriter calent iudicanda. fo. xxxi. ii. C
Dubitatio de nonnullis quomodo calida frigida ue appellentur.
fo. xlix. i. A
Diuersorum ex medicamentis effectuum causae. fo. liiii. i. C
Diacantharidon. fo. lv. ii. A
Deleterion. folio lvi. ii. A
Deleteria vnde iudicanda. fo. eodem. ii. C
Dubitatio de iis quae sub calore applicata, tamen refrigerant.
fo. lvii. i. C
Dupliciter fieri aliquid calidius. fo. lix. ii. A
Dupliciter fieri aliquid frigidius. fo. eodem. ii. B
Diuisio partium maiorum in sibi proximas. fo. lxvi.
Digestionem in phlegmone maxime optandam esse curationem. fo.
lxvii.
Dolor quando desinat. fo. eodem.
Doloris in febri spacium et eius terminus. fo. lxix.
E
Eusarcos. folio xii. i. A
Eucraton corpus quod dicatur. fo. xvii. ii. B
Ex siccitate de solo naso iudicandum. fo. xlv. i. A
Error alius in iudicandis temperamentis. fo. xlvi. ii. B
F
Frigidam temperiem nec humidam necessario esse nec siccam.
folio xvii. i. C
Florescentis etatis temperies. fo. xxv. i. A
Fibrae temperies. folio eodem. i. A
Fibrae variae. folio xxxii. ii. C
Flauae bilis temperies. folio xxxiii. i. C
Formatricem vim artificem facultatem esse. fo. xliiii. ii. A
Frigida per naturam immodice calefacta vim suam amittere. folio
lviii. i. A
H
Humidum & calidum temperamentum esse pessimum. fo. viii. i. A
Hominis cutem medium esse in calido fri. humore & sicc.
proprieque eam quae in manu est. fo. xix. ii. B
Habitus hirsutus & glaber quam temperiem comitentur. folio
xxxvi. i. B
Hypophora de pilorum generatione. folio eo. i. C
Hippocrates. folio lxvii.
Hipophora & Solutio. folio lxix.
Hippocratis dictum, & eiusdem nonnulla probabilitas. folio
eodem.
Hepialos quae vocetur. folio lxxi.
I
Iusticia quid. folio xiiii. i. B
Intemperies quae in altera tantum oppositione excedunt, quo loco
ponendae. fo. xvii. ii. C
Intemperies duplex. fo. xxxv. i. C
Intemperamenti quod intra sanitatem sit, nota. f. eo. ii. A
Internarum particularum temperiem ex functionibus dignoscendam,
tum ex continentium eas partium affectu. fo. xli. i. C
Inaequales esse temperies in regionibus intemperatis. fo. eo.
ii. A
Inaequalem esse temperiem partium quae phlegmone laborant. fo.
xlvii. i. C
In iis quae potestate calida, frigidave sunt, tria genera
spectanda. fo. lv. ii. A
Iuniores medici in quo fuerint falsi. fo. lix. ii. A
In explorando medicamento aliud quiddam obseruandum. fo. lxii.
i. C
In phlegmone duplicem esse affectum. fo. lxiii. ii. B
In explorando medicamento aliud obseruandum folio eodem. fo.
ii. C
In phlegmone quis sanguis primum calefiat quis deinceps. fo.
lxviii
In corpore quod phlegmone laboret quid maxime inflammetur quid
deinde. fo. eodem
Indolescentiae in hecticis causa. fo. lxix.
Inaequalitas temperamenti in sanis indolens est. fo. eo.
Inaequalis intemperamenti generandi varie rationes. f. lxx
In hepialis cur frigus et calor simul sentiantur. fo. lxxi
In accessionum inuasione febricitantes aliquos frigus et
calorem simul sentire. fo. eodem.
In lipyriis vtrunque perpetuo ita vt in accessionibus sentiri.
fo. eodem.
L
Lactuca cur somno conducat. fo. lix. i. A
Lactucae succum liberalius sumptum, similem vim habere cum
papaueris succo. fo. lx. i. A
M
Molles et durae manus ad quid aptae. fo. xxi. i. A
Membranae temperies. fo. xxxiii. i. A
Medius siue eusarcos, quis. fo. xii. i. A
Medium in toto animalium genere. fo. xi. ii. C
Medium in hominum specie. fo. eodem. ii. C
Mediocriter calens sit oportet, quod siccum humidumve
iudicabis. fo. xix. i. B
Miningon siue membranarum cerebri temperies. folio xxxiii. i. A
Medii cartilaginis et ligamenti corporis, temperies. fo. eodem.
i. B
Melancholica temperamenta vnde. fo. xlvi. i. C
Melancholicus, quis. fo. xlvii. i. A
Melancholici futuri, qui. fo. xlvi. ii. A
Medicamentorum natura duplex. fo. li. ii. B
Medicamentorum tertia quedam species. fo. eo. ii. B
Medicamentorum quarta species. fo. eo. ii. C
Medicamentum Medeae. fo. lii. i. B
Medicamenta tantum, quae sint. fo. lvi. ii. A
Medicamentum quando tepidum applicandum sit, quando frigidum.
fo. lxiiii. i. B
Miscere simplicia corpora humani facultatis non esse, sed dei
uel naturae. fo. xix. i. C
N
Neruorum temperies. folio xxxii. ii. A