=251.= This battle secured the ascendency of Philip in Thessaly. He

established a more popular government in Pheræ, took and garrisoned

Magnesia, and then advanced upon Thermopylæ. The Athenians anticipated

the danger, and guarded the pass with a strong force. But the liberty of

Greece was destined to be sacrificed to her internal dissensions. The

Sacred War had continued eleven years, when the Thebans called in the

aid of Philip to complete the destruction of Phocis. The Athenians now

remained neutral, and Philip passed Thermopylæ without opposition. In a

short campaign he crushed Phocis, and was admitted as a member of the

Amphictyonic Council, in the place of the conquered state.

[Sidenote: B. C. 349.]

=252.= Athens was now the only power in Greece capable of opposing the

Macedonian king, and Athens was no longer possessed of a Miltiades, a

Conon, or a Themistocles. A great orator, however, had arisen, and when

Olynthus sent envoys to implore aid against the invader, who was now

attacking the Chalcidian cities, the eloquence of Demosthenes aroused

some faint show of their former spirit. The attempted rescue was

defeated, however, by treachery within the walls; and, in 347, Olynthus

fell. The threefold peninsula was now in the power of Philip, and he was

able to push his interests throughout Greece rather by intrigue than

force. Even in Athens a powerful party, sustained by his bribes, labored

to undermine the efforts of the true patriots, of whom Demosthenes was

chief. Æs´chines was the mouth-piece of the Macedonian party, an orator

second only to Demosthenes himself, and won to Philip’s side, probably,

more by flatteries than gifts. He constantly urged peace with the king,

while Demosthenes, as soon as he perceived the extent of Philip’s

designs, opposed them with all the unsparing vehemence of his nature. His

_Philippics_ are the most forcible examples in any language of bold and

eloquent opposition to an unjust usurpation of power.

[Sidenote: B. C. 339.]

=253.= In 340, war was declared on account of the aggressions of Philip

on the Bosphorus; and the Second Sacred War, which broke out in the

following year, gave him a reason for again passing Thermopylæ. He was

now appointed general-in-chief of the Amphictyonic forces, and thus

gained a position in the very heart of Greece, which he did not fail to

use for his own advantage.

[Sidenote: Aug. 7, B. C. 338.]

=254.= The Thebans, in alarm, applied to Athens for aid, which was not

refused. The armies met in battle at Chæronea, and the victory of Philip

gave the death-blow to Grecian independence. All the states except

Sparta acknowledged his sovereignty, and he was made generalissimo of

the Hellenic forces in the war now projected against Persia. To overawe

the hostility of Sparta, he marched through the Peloponnesus to the

southern extremity, and returned by the western coast, meeting no serious

opposition.

Philip’s death by assassination interrupted the movement against the

Persians, and for a moment revived the hopes of the patriots; but the

Macedonian party prevailed under the youthful Alexander, who surpassed

his father both as general and as king.

RECAPITULATION.

Sparta destroyed the Olynthian confederacy, and seized upon

Thebes, which was rescued after three years by Pelopidas and

his fellow exiles. Athens regained her dominion both in the

eastern and western seas, while Thebes became the head of

the new Bœotian League. The treaty of Callias secured peace

among all the states, except Thebes and Sparta. The victory of

Epaminondas over the Spartans at Leuctra established the Theban

supremacy, which was recognized and supported by the Persians

during the remaining years of his life. He four times invaded

Peloponnesus; organized an Arcadian confederacy, with the new

city, Megalopolis, at its head; restored the exiled Messenians

to the lands of their ancestors; twice attacked Sparta itself;

and, finally, triumphed and fell at Mantinea. Agesilaus died on

his return from Egypt, where his aid had secured the throne to

Nectanabis. Athens declined from her second period of greatness

in consequence of the Social War, B. C. 357-355. The Phocians,

with the Delphic treasures which they confiscated, gained

ascendency in central Greece, but lost it in war with Philip of

Macedon. This king ended the Sacred War (B. C. 357-346) by the

destruction of Phocis, assumed her place in the Amphictyonic

Council, conquered the Chalcidian peninsulas, led the allied

forces in the Second Sacred War, and by his victory at Chæronea

established his supremacy over Greece. His son Alexander

inherited his civil and military command.

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW.

BOOK III.

1. By what names has Greece been known? § 8.

2. What tribes were included among the Hellenes? 9.

3. What foreigners aided to civilize Greece? 10.

4. Describe three of the Greek heroes. 11-13.

5. What can be said of the siege of Troy? 14.

6. What was the state of the country and people in the

Heroic Age? 11, 17-20.

7. Describe the kings. 15, 16.

8. What connections between Greek and Asiatic religions? 21.

9. Name the twelve Olympian deities. 23.

10. What bearing had Greek belief upon human conduct? 25.

11. What foreign ceremonies were borrowed by the Greeks? 26, 27, 29.

12. What is known of the Mysteries? 28.

13. Describe the oracles. 30-32.

14. What migrations in Greece, B. C. 1124-1100? 33, 34.

15. Describe the Asiatic settlements. 35-37, 85, 86.

16. What political changes at the close of the Heroic Age? 38.

17. What were the bonds of union among the Greeks? 39, 42.

18. Describe the games and the rewards of victors. 40, 41.

19. Recount the history of Argos. 43.

20. What were the condition and government of Sparta, B. C. 900? 44-46.

21. Describe the discipline of Lycurgus. 47-53.

22. The wars of Sparta during the Second Period. 55-61.

23. What was the character of Spartan influence in Greece? 62.

24. What difference of character between Athenians and Spartans? 63.

25. What changes in Athenian government within 400 years? 64, 65.

26. Describe the laws of Draco and their results. 66, 67.

27. What political parties in Attica? 68.

28. What were the character and history of Solon? 69, 70, 74.

29. What was the spirit of his laws? 71-73.

30. Describe the rise of Pisistratus. 75.

31. What occurred during his first tyranny? 76.

32. What occasioned his second expulsion? 77.

33. Describe his third reign. 78.

34. The reign and expulsion of Hippias. 79, 80.

35. What changes were introduced by Clisthenes? 81.

36. Who opposed him? 82.

37. What dangers threatened Athens at this time? 83.

38. What ceremonies attended the founding of Greek colonies? 84.

39. Describe the colonies in Italy. 87-89.

40. In Gaul, Sicily, Africa, Thrace. 91-94.

41. Describe the movements of Darius against Greece. 95-97.

42. The battle of Marathon. 98, 99.

43. The fall of Miltiades. 101, 102.

44. The character and history of Aristides. 103, 104, 116,

117, 130, 132.

45. The character and career of Themistocles. 104-109,

113-117, 130, 136, 138.

46. The battle of Thermopylæ. 111, 112.

47. The battle of Salamis. 117.

48. The retreat of Xerxes. 118.

49. The embassy of Alexander. 119, 120.

50. The condition of Athens. 121.

51. Describe the campaign in Bœotia. 122-126.

52. The subsequent operations of the Greeks. 128, 129.

53. What changes in the rank and politics of Athens? 130.

54. Tell the story of Pausanias. 131.

55. Describe the rise of the Delian Confederacy. 132.

56. The career of Cimon. 133-137, 139-142, 150.

57. The causes and events of the Third

Messenian War. 139, 142, 148.

58. The history of Pericles. 140, 143, 145, 152-157,

159, 161-165.

59. Tell the story of the First Peloponnesian War. 143-147.

60. What occurred at Delphi, B. C. 448? 151.

61. Describe the battle of Coronæa, and its consequences

to Athens. 152-154.

62. The Samian revolt. 156, 157.

63. The war between Corinth and Corcyra. 158.

64. The Theban attack upon Platæa. 160.

65. How was Greece divided in the Peloponnesian War? 161.

66. What was the condition of Athens during the first two

years? 162-164, 166.

67. Describe the siege of Platæa. 167.

68. The revolt of Mytilene. 168-170.

69. The revolution in Corcyra. 171.

70. The condition of Greece in the sixth year of the war. 172.

71. Describe the campaign at Pylos and Sphacteria. 173, 174.

72. What massacres occurred in the eighth year? 175.

73. Describe the invasion of Bœotia. 176.

74. The campaign of Brasidas. 177.

75. How long did the Peace of Nicias continue? 178, 180, 188.

76. Describe the career of Alcibiades. 179-186, 192-194, 198-200, 202.

77. The Sicilian expedition. 179-191.

78. What occasioned a revolution in Athens? 194, 195.

79. Describe the maritime movements of 411, 410 B. C. 197-199.

80. What part was taken by Persia in the Peloponnesian War? 192-194,

198, 201, 204.

81. What occurred at Ægos-Potami? 205, 206.

82. What were the results to Athens? 207-209.

83. Describe the reign of the Thirty Tyrants. 210, 211.

84. The reaction under Thrasybulus. 212, 213.

85. The trial and death of Socrates. 214.

86. Describe the war of Sparta against Elis. 215.

87. Agesilaus, and his Asiatic campaign. 216, 217.

88. The death of Lysander, and retirement of Pausanias. 218.

89. The three great battles of 394 B. C. 219-221.

90. Who restored the walls of Athens? 222.

91. Describe the last two years of the Corinthian War. 223.

92. What were the terms of the Peace of Antalcidas? 226.

93. What occurred at Thebes, from 382 to 379 B. C.? 227, 229, 230.

94. Describe the war in Bœotia and the western seas. 232.

95. The treaty of Callias. 233, 234.

96. The character and tactics of Epaminondas. 229, 235-240,

244-246.

97. The consequences to Sparta of the battle of Leuctra. 236.

98. The restoration of the Messenians. 239.

99. The ambition of the Arcadians. 241.

100. The intervention of the Persians. 242.

101. The plunder of Olympia. 243.

102. The last campaign of Agesilaus. 247.

103. The second period of Athenian greatness, and

Social War. 248.

104. The Sacred War. 249.

105. The advance of Philip of Macedon. 250, 251.

106. Demosthenes and his _Philippics_. 252.

107. The results of the battle of Chæronea. 254.

108. Who succeeded Philip as head of the Grecian armies? 254.

109. How long was Athens the leading state of Greece?

110. What two periods of Spartan supremacy?

111. Length of the Theban supremacy?

112. What was an Olympiad? 40.

BOOK IV.

HISTORY OF THE MACEDONIAN EMPIRE AND THE KINGDOMS FORMED FROM IT, UNTIL

THEIR CONQUEST BY THE ROMANS.

FIRST PERIOD. _From the Rise of the Monarchy to the Death of Alexander

the Great, about B. C. 700-323._

=1.= The Kingdom of Macedon, lying north of Thessaly and east of

Illyr´icum, was of little importance before the reign of Philip II.,

whose aggressions ended the independent history of Greece. (See Book III,

§§ 248-254.) In 507 B. C., Amyntas I. submitted to Darius Hystaspes; and

fifteen years later, in the first expedition of Mardonius, the country

became a mere province of the Persian empire, the native kings governing

as tributaries. After Xerxes’ retreat, B. C. 480, Macedonia became free

again, and began to push eastward along the northern coast of the Ægean.

Here it met two rivals: the new Thracian kingdom of Sitalces upon its

eastern frontier, and the Athenian power in the Greek cities of the

Chalcidian peninsulas.

=2.= When Athens was prostrated by her Sicilian disasters, the short but

brilliant reign of Ar´chela´us I. (B. C. 413-399) laid the foundation of

Macedonian greatness. He improved his country by roads, strengthened it

by forts, and introduced a better discipline into the army. His death was

followed by forty years of great tumult, a continued scene of plots and

assassinations, to recount which would only confuse without profiting

the student. When Perdiccas III. died in battle, he left an infant son,

Amyntas, under the regency of his brother Philip. At least five other

princes claimed the crown; the victorious Illyrians occupied the western

provinces, and Thrace and Pæo´nia were ready to absorb the eastern.

=3.= Philip overcame all these perils with admirable spirit and ability.

He made himself king instead of his nephew, defeated the Illyrians, and

took advantage of the Social War to seize Amphipolis, Pydna, and Potidæa.

He pushed the Macedonian boundary eastward as far as the Nestus, and

built the town of Philip´pi for the protection of the gold mines. These

had fallen into neglect during the wars of Athens, but under his improved

management they soon yielded a yearly revenue of a thousand talents

($1,250,000).

=4.= Philip, in his youth, had spent three years in Thebes, where he had

studied the tactics of Epaminondas, as well as the language, character,

and politics of the Greeks. On coming to power, he devoted unwearied

attention to the drilling of his army, until it far surpassed that of any

Hellenic state. No less skilled in diplomacy than in military science,

he knew how to take advantage of the rivalries in Greece, and the

corruptibility of all parties, to play off one against the other, and so

render himself supreme. His rapid movements made him seem to be in many

places at the same moment, and no circumstance which either threatened or

favored his interests escaped his eye.

=5.= The Olynthian War ended with the capture of thirty-two cities in

Chalcidice; the Sacred War made Philip master of Phocis and head of the

Amphictyonic League. In eastern Thrace, the Athenians found aid in the

Persians, who were already alarmed by the rapid rise of the Macedonian

power, and Perin´thus and Byzantium were thus saved for a time. Philip

was victorious (B. C. 339) against a Scythian prince of what is now

Bulga´ria; and though he was defeated and wounded on his return, in a

battle with the Triballi, his plots went on with uninterrupted success.

The Second Sacred War gave him supremacy in central Greece, and the

victory at Chæronea prostrated all remaining opposition. The Congress at

Corinth (B. C. 337) acknowledged his headship, and appointed him to lead

the Greek forces against Persia. The advanced guard of the Macedonian

army was already in Asia, when Philip was assassinated, during the

festivities attending the marriage of his daughter, B. C. 336.

=6.= In the midst of Philip’s early victories, he had heard of the

birth of his son Alexander at Pella. He wrote immediately to his friend

Ar´istot´le,[58] expressing his joy that the young prince was born

during the life of the philosopher to whom he could most gladly commit

his education. On the same day that Alexander was born, the temple of

Artemis at Ephesus was burnt to the ground. The priests and soothsayers,

regarding the fire as an evil omen, ran about the city beating their

breasts and crying aloud, “This day has brought forth the scourge and

destroyer of Asia.” B. C. 356.

[Illustration: Coin of Alexander, enlarged one-half.]

=7.= At the age of sixteen, Alexander was left regent of the kingdom

during his father’s campaign against Byzantium. At Chæroaea, two years

later, he led a corps of Macedonian youth against the Sacred Band of

Thebes, and the victory was mainly due to his courage and impetuosity.

Upon the death of his father, Alexander, at twenty years of age, ascended

a throne beset with many dangers. He expelled or killed his nearest

rivals, marched into Greece and convened at Corinth a new congress, which

conferred upon him the same dignities and powers previously granted to

his father; then instantly returning to Macedon, he signally defeated

his enemies on the west and north, some of whom he pursued even beyond

the Danube. During these campaigns a false report of his death reached

Greece, and Thebes seized the occasion to revolt. But Alexander appeared

suddenly before her gates, stormed and took the city, which, by way of

warning to others, he completely destroyed—saving only the house of

Pindar, the poet—and either enslaved or massacred the inhabitants.

=8.= Greece was now awed into submission, and Alexander prepared to

execute his father’s and his own schemes of Asiatic conquest. In the

spring of 334 B. C., he crossed the Hellespont with 35,000 men. The

Persians awaiting him at the Granicus were defeated, and Alexander, with

his usual celerity, overran Asia Minor, which submitted with little

opposition. Memnon, a Rhodian Greek in the service of Darius, and his

greatest general, desired to carry the war into Macedonia, by means of

the overwhelming fleet of the Persians. His movements detained Alexander

some months near the Ægean coast; but his death, in the spring of 333 B.

C., left the invader free to march toward the heart of the empire. Darius

led a vast army to the plain of the Orontes, where he might have had the

advantage over his assailant; but Alexander lingered in the Cilician

mountain passes, until the Persian king was impatient and came to meet

him. The battle of Issus (B. C. 333, Nov.) resulted in the defeat of the

Persians with great slaughter.

=9.= Instead of following Darius, Alexander proceeded to conquer the

sea-coast of the Mediterranean as far as Egypt, thus providing for the

security of Macedon and Greece. Most of the Phœnician cities submitted

as he approached, but Tyre withstood him seven months. When it was taken

(B. C. 332, July), 8,000 of its people were massacred and 30,000 sold

into slavery. Ga´za was captured after a siege of two months. According

to Josephus, the conqueror then marched upon Jerusalem. The high priest,

Jad´dua, came forth to meet him, wearing the breastplate of precious

stones and the miter inscribed with the Holy Name. Alexander prostrated

himself with profound reverence before the priest, and explained to his

followers that in a vision, before leaving Europe, he had seen such a

figure, which had invited him to the conquest of Asia. The high priest

pointed out to him the prophecies of Daniel concerning his career; and

Alexander, in adding the Jews to his empire, exempted them from tribute

every seventh year, when, according to their law, they could neither sow

nor reap.

=10.= In Egypt the Macedonian king was gladly welcomed, for the people

hated the Persians for having insulted their gods and profaned their

temples. At the western mouth of the Nile he founded a new capital,

which he designed as the commercial exchange of the eastern and western

worlds. Alexandria, with its great advantages of position, soon became a

rich and magnificent city. A less judicious proceeding of the conqueror

was a toilsome march across the desert to the temple of Amun. He was

rewarded, however, in being saluted by the priests as the son of the god,

a distinction which Alexander greatly valued.

=11.= Turning to the north and east, Alexander now sought the grand

contest which was to transfer to him the dominions of Cyrus. He had

purposely given Darius time to collect the entire force of his empire, so

that one battle might decide its fate. The battle of Arbela (B. C. 331,

Oct.) has been described in Book II. As its result the three capitals,

Susa, Persep´olis, and Babylon, surrendered almost without resistance;

and Alexander might, without further effort, have assumed the pomp and

ease of an Oriental monarch. But his restless spirit carried him on to

the conquest of the eastern provinces and India. He first marched into

Media, where Darius had rallied the remnants of his forces to oppose him,

but on his approach the dethroned king fled through the Caspian Gates

to Bactria. Before Alexander could overtake him, he was murdered by his

rebellious satrap, Bessus, who assumed the title of king of Persia.

=12.= The Greek mercenaries of Darius, who had formed his most effective

force, were now added to the army of the conqueror. From province

to province Alexander marched, receiving submission and organizing

governments. Bessus fled into Sogdiana, but was taken, and suffered a

cruel death for his treason and usurpation. A new city of Alexandria

was founded on the Jaxartes; and having chastised the Scythians to the

northward, the conqueror returned to Bactria, where he spent the winter

of 329 B. C.

=13.= The genius of Alexander began to be disgraced by the pride and

unscrupulous cruelty of an Eastern king. He adopted the Persian dress and

ceremonial, and required his courtiers to prostrate themselves before

him, as to a divinity rather than a mortal. He had already put to death

his friend Philo´tas, on an unproved charge of plotting against his life;

and the aged Parme´nio, father of Philotas, was subjected without trial

to a similar fate. At Bactra, in a drunken revel, Alexander murdered his

friend Clitus with his own hand.

=14.= During his two years’ war against Sogdiana, Alexander captured a

mountain fortress, where Oxyar´tes, a Bactrian prince, had deposited his

family. Roxa´na, one of the princesses, became the wife of the conqueror.

In the spring of 327 B. C., the Macedonian army crossed the Indus and

invaded the Punjab. No resistance was encountered until it reached the

Hydas´pes, where Porus, an Indian king, was drawn up with his elephants

and a formidable body of men. An obstinate battle resulted in the defeat

and capture of Porus; but his brave spirit so commanded the respect of

his conqueror, that he was permitted to retain his kingdom.

Alexander founded two cities near the Hydaspes, one named Buceph´ala, in

honor of his favorite horse, which died there, and the other, Nicæ´a,

in commemoration of his victories. He gave orders for the building of

a fleet from the Indian forests, while he advanced with his army still

farther to the eastward. All the tribes as far as the Hypha´sis (Sutlej)

were conquered, one by one. On arriving at that river, the Macedonians

refused to go farther. They declared that they had more than fulfilled

the terms of their enlistment, and that they were worn out by the

hardships of eight unprecedented campaigns.

=15.= Alexander was compelled to turn back. His fleet was now ready, and

he descended the Hydaspes to the Indus, in the autumn and winter of 327

B. C. His army marched in two columns along the banks, the entire valley

submitting with little resistance. Two more cities were founded, and

left with Greek garrisons and governors. Arriving at the Indian Ocean,

Near´chus was sent with the fleet to the Persian Gulf, while Alexander

returned by land. His march through Gedro´sia was the most severe of all

his operations, the army suffering for the want of food and water. At

Pura he obtained supplies, and proceeded through Kerman to Pasargadæ, and

thence to Persepolis. Arriving at Susa in the spring of 325 B. C., he

allowed his army some months of needed rest, while he began to organize

the vast empire which he had so rapidly built up.

=16.= Desiring to unite his eastern and western dominions by every bond

of sympathy and common interest, he assigned to eighty of his officers

Asiatic wives with rich dowries. He had himself set the example by taking

for his second wife Barsi´ne, daughter of Darius III.; and when ten

thousand of the soldiery married Asiatic women, he gave presents to them

all. Twenty thousand Persians were received into the army, and drilled

in Macedonian tactics; while Persian satraps were placed over several

provinces, and the court was equally composed of Asiatics and Europeans.

Some of Alexander’s veterans, seeing the conquered nations placed on

a level with themselves, broke into open mutiny. He silenced their

complaints with great address, and then sent 10,000 of them home.

=17.= Unlike most conquerors, Alexander improved the countries which he

had won by arms. Rivers were cleared from obstructions, commerce revived,

and western enterprise took the place of Asiatic indolence and poverty.

The Greek language and literature were planted every-where: every new

exploration added to the treasures of science and the enlightenment of

the human race. On his march from Ecbatana to Babylon, Alexander was met

by embassadors from almost every part of the known world, who came to

offer either submission or friendship.

=18.= He designed to conquer first Arabia, then Italy, Carthage, and the

West, extending his empire from the Indus to the Pillars of Hercules.

Babylon was to be his capital; and Alexander descended the river, to

inspect in person the improvement of the canals which distributed water

over the plain. But his magnificent schemes were cut short from their

accomplishment by his early death. On his return from visiting the

canals, he found the Arabian expedition nearly ready to sail, and he

celebrated the occasion by a banquet to Nearchus and the chief officers.

In the midst of the subsequent preparations, the king was attacked by a

fever, occasioned by his exertions among the marshes, and aggravated,

perhaps, by the wine he had taken at the festival. After an illness of

eleven days he died, at the age of thirty-two, having reigned twelve

years and eight months.

RECAPITULATION.

Macedonia rose to greatness under Archelaus (B. C. 418-399);

was greatly increased by Philip II. (B. C. 350-336), who became

master of Greece. Alexander, trained in his youth to war and

diplomacy, began his reign at twenty; led a Greek army into

Asia; defeated the Persians at the Granicus and at Issus;

conquered Phœnicia, Syria, and Egypt; founded Alexandria on the

Nile; gained a decisive victory over Darius at Arbela, B. C.

331; subdued the eastern and northern provinces of the empire;

founded cities in western India; explored its rivers and coasts

in the interest of science; planned the amalgamation of Europe

and Asia, and the extension of his empire westward to the

Atlantic; died B. C. 323.

SECOND PERIOD. _From the Death of Alexander to the Battle of Ipsus_, B.

C. 323-301.

=19.= Alexander named no successor, but shortly before his death he gave

his ring to Perdiccas. This general, as prime minister, kept the empire

united for two years in the royal family. An infant prince, Alexander

IV., born after his father’s death, was associated on the throne with

Philip Arrhidæ´us, half-brother of the great Alexander. Four regents or

guardians of the empire were appointed—two in Europe and two in Asia. One

of these was murdered by Perdiccas, who thus acquired for himself the

sole administration of Asia, Antipater and Crat´erus ruling west of the

Bosphorus.

The provinces not already bestowed by the conqueror were divided among

ten of his generals, who were expected to govern in the name and for

the benefit of the two kings. Finding it impossible, however, either by

management or force, to keep these lieutenants in subjection to the mere

name of royalty, Perdiccas formed a plan to seize the sovereignty for

himself. Eu´menes was on his side, while his colleagues in the regency,

and the two great provincial governors, Ptol´emy and Antig´onus, were

his most powerful opponents. In a campaign against Ptolemy, in Egypt,

Perdiccas was slain by his own mutinous soldiers. Craterus fell in a

battle with Eumenes, in Cappadocia, and the sole regency devolved upon

Antip´ater. This general defeated the schemes of Euryd´ice—niece of

Alexander the Great, and wife of the imbecile king, Philip Arrhidæus—who

even harangued the army at Tripar´adi´sus, in Syria, demanding to be

admitted to a share in the government. A fresh division and assignment of

the provinces was now made. Antigonus was charged with the prosecution of

the war against Eumenes, in which he made himself master of the greater

part of Asia Minor.

=20.= Antipater died in Macedon, B. C. 319, leaving the regency, not

to his son Cassan´der, but to his friend Polysper´chon. Cassander, in

disgust, fled to Antigonus; and in the war which followed, these two,

with Ptolemy, sought the disruption of the empire, while Eumenes and

Polysperchon fought for its unity. Eumenes collected a force in Cilicia,

with which he meant to conquer Syria and Phœnicia, and thus gain command

of the sea. Antigonus first defeated a royal fleet near Byzantium, and

then marched across the country to the borders of Syria, and pursued

Eumenes inland beyond the Tigris. A number of the eastern satraps here

joined Eumenes, but after two indecisive battles he was seized by his own

troops and given up to Antigonus, who put him to death, B. C. 316.

=21.= In Macedonia, the mock king, Philip Arrhidæus, and his wife were

executed, by order of Olympias, the mother of Alexander the Great.

But this imperious princess was captured, in her turn, at Pydna;

and, in violation of the terms of her surrender, was murdered by her

enemies. Cassander became master of Macedonia and Greece. He married

Thes´saloni´ca, half-sister of the Conqueror, and founded in her honor

the city which bears her name, B. C. 316.

=22.= The ambition of Antigonus now began to alarm his colleagues,

for he was evidently not to be satisfied with less than the entire

dominion of Alexander. He gave away the eastern satrapies according to

his pleasure. From Babylonia he drove Seleu´cus, who took refuge with

Ptolemy in Egypt, and formed a league with Cassander, Lysim´achus, and

Asander. A war of four years followed (B. C. 315-311), which resulted

in the re-establishment of Seleucus in Babylon and the East, while

Antigonus gained power in Greece, Syria, and Asia Minor. The peace of B.

C. 311 provided for the independence of the Greek cities, but allowed

each general to keep what he had gained, and left Cassander regent

of Macedonia until Alexander IV. should be of age. It was probably

understood between the contracting parties that this last event was

never to occur. The young king and his mother were murdered, by order of

Cassander.

=23.= At the end of a year, Ptolemy broke the peace, on the pretense

that Antigonus had not liberated the Greek cities of Asia Minor. He

was opposed in Cilicia by Deme´trius, son of Antigonus, who gained in

this war the title of _Po´liorce´tes_, the Besieger. Ptolemy, entering

Greece, seized Sicyon and Corinth, and aimed to marry Cleopatra, the

last survivor of the royal house of Macedon; but the princess was

assassinated, by order of Cassander, B. C. 308. Demetrius now arriving

with a fleet to the relief of Athens, Ptolemy withdrew to Cyprus, and

gained possession of the island. A great battle followed off Salamis, one

of the most severe in the world’s history. Ptolemy was defeated, with the

loss of all but eight of his ships, leaving 17,000 prisoners in the hands

of the enemy.

=24.= The five principal generals now assumed the kingly title. Demetrius

spent a year in the siege of Rhodes, which, by its brave and memorable

defense, secured the privileges of a neutral in the remaining years of

the war. Returning to Greece, he assembled a congress at Corinth, which

conferred upon him the titles formerly bestowed on Philip and Alexander,

and then marched northward against the regent, or, rather, king of

Macedon. Alarmed at his endangered position, Cassander stirred up his

allies to invade Asia Minor.

=25.= The decisive battle took place, B. C. 301, at Ipsus, in Phrygia.

Demetrius had arrived from Europe to the assistance of his father; but

Seleucus, with the forces of the East, including 480 Indian elephants,

increased the army of Lysimachus. Antigonus, in his eighty-first year,

was slain; Demetrius, completely defeated, took refuge in Greece, but

was not permitted to enter Athens. The two conquerors, Seleucus and

Lysimachus, divided the dominions of Alexander, with due regard to their

own interests. Seleucus received the Euphrates Valley, Upper Syria,

Cappadocia, and part of Phrygia. Lysimachus added the rest of Asia Minor

to his Thracian dominion, which extended along the western shores of the

Euxine as far as the mouths of the Danube; Ptolemy retained Egypt, and

Cassander continued to reign in Macedonia until his death.

[Illustration: EMPIRE of the MACEDONIANS.]

=26.= The results of the twenty years’ war were disastrous to Greece

and Macedonia, not only by the exhausting expenditure of blood and

treasure, but by the introduction of Oriental habits of luxury and

unmanly servility, in place of the free and simple manners of former

times. Though the minds of the Greeks were enlarged by a knowledge of

the history and philosophy of the Eastern nations, and by observation of

the natural world and its productions in new climates and circumstances,

yet most of the influences which had kept alive the free spirit of the

people had ceased to work. Patriotism was dead; learning took the place

of genius; and imitation, the place of art.

=27.= At the same time, Asia had gained many splendid cities, her

commerce had vastly increased, and the Greek military discipline and

forms of civil government gave new strength to her armies and states.

From the Indus to the Adriatic, and from the Crimea to the southern

bounds of Egypt, the Greek language prevailed, at least among the

educated and ruling classes. In Asia Minor, Syria, and Egypt, the

influence of Hellenic thought continued a thousand years in full force,

until Mahomet and his successors set up their new Semitic empire. The

wide diffusion of the Greek language in western Asia was among the most

important preparations for the spread of Christianity. If Alexander had

lived to complete his great scheme of interfusing the eastern and western

races, Asia would have gained and Europe lost in still greater measure.

RECAPITULATION.

Perdiccas became vizier, Philip Arrhidæus and Alexander IV

being nominally kings. Wars of the generals for the division of

the empire, B. C. 321-316; 315-311; 310-301. Murder of the two

kings, 316, 311. Battle of Salamis in Cyprus, 306. The decisive

combat at Ipsus gave Syria and the East to Seleucus; Egypt, to

Ptolemy; Thrace, to Lysimachus; Macedonia, to Cassander.

THIRD PERIOD. _History of the Several Kingdoms into which Alexander’s

Empire was divided._

I. THE SYRIAN KINGDOM OF THE SELEU´CIDÆ. B. C. 312-65.

=28.= After the restoration of Seleucus to the government of Babylonia

(see § 22), he extended his power over all the provinces between the

Euphrates and the Indus. He even made war against an Indian kingdom upon

the western headwaters of the Ganges, gaining thereby a great extension

of commerce, and the addition of five hundred elephants to his army. The

battle of Ipsus added to his dominions the country as far west as the

Mediterranean and the center of Phrygia, making his kingdom by far the

greatest that had been formed from the fragments of Alexander’s empire.

This vast dominion was organized by Seleucus with great skill and

energy. In each of the seventy-two provinces new cities sprang up, as

monuments of his power and centers of Greek civilization. Sixteen of

these were named Antioch, in honor of his father; five Laodice´a, for his

mother, Laod´ice; seven for himself, Sel´euci´a; and several for his two

wives, Apame´a and Stratoni´ce. To watch more effectually the movements

of his rivals, Ptolemy and Lysimachus, he removed the seat of government

from the Euphrates to his new capital, Antioch, on the Orontes, which

continued nearly a thousand years to be one of the richest and most

populous cities in the world.

[Illustration: Coin of Antioch, twice the size of the original.]

=29.= In 293 B. C., Seleucus divided his empire with his son Anti´ochus,

giving the younger prince all the provinces east of the Euphrates.

Demetrius Poliorcetes, after gaining and then losing Macedonia, sought

to make for himself a new kingdom in Asia, out of the possessions of

Lysimachus and Seleucus. He was defeated by the latter, and remained a

prisoner the rest of his life.

=30.= Lysimachus, king of Thrace, under the influence of his Egyptian

wife and her brother, Ptolemy Cerau´nus, had alienated the hearts of

his subjects by the murder of his son. The widow of the murdered prince

fled for protection to the court of Seleucus, who undertook her cause

and invaded the territories of Lysimachus. The two aged kings were now

the only survivors of the companions and generals of Alexander. In the

battle of Corupe´dion, B. C. 281, Lysimachus was slain, and all his

Asiatic dominions were transferred to Seleucus. The empire of Alexander

seemed about to be united in the hands of one man. Before crossing the

Hellespont to seize the European provinces, the Syrian king committed the

government of his present dominion to his son, Antiochus. Then passing

the strait, he advanced to Lys´imachi´a, the capital of his late enemy;

but here he was killed by the hand of Ptolemy Ceraunus, B. C. 280. Thrace

and Macedonia became the prize of the murderer.

=31.= Antiochus I. (Soter) inherited the Asiatic dominions of his father,

and made war in Asia Minor against the native kings of Bithynia. One of

these, Nicomedes, called to his assistance the Gauls, who were ravaging

eastern Europe, and rewarded their services with a large territory in

northern Phrygia, which was thence called Gala´tia. North-western Lydia

was also wrested from Antiochus, and formed the kingdom of Per´gamus.

From his only important victory over the Gauls, B. C. 275, the Syrian

king derived his title _Soter_ (the Deliverer); but his operations were

usually unsuccessful, and his kingdom was much reduced both in wealth

and power during his reign. He was defeated and slain near Ephesus, in a

battle with the Gauls, B. C. 261.

=32.= Antiochus II. bore the blasphemous title of _Theos_ (the God), but

he showed himself less than a man by the weakness and licentiousness

of his reign. He abandoned all affairs to worthless favorites, who

were neither feared nor respected in the distant provinces, and two

independent kingdoms sprang up unchecked in Parthia and Bactria, B.

C. 255. The influence of his wife, Laodice, involved him in a war

with Egypt. It was ended by the divorce of Laodice, and the marriage

of Antiochus with Ber´eni´ce, daughter of Ptolemy Philadelphus (B. C.

260-252). On the death of Philadelphus, Antiochus sent away Berenice

and took back Laodice; but she, doubting his constancy, murdered him to

secure the kingdom for her son, Seleucus. Berenice and her infant son

were also put to death.

=33.= Seleucus II. (Callini´cus) was first engaged in war with the king

of Egypt, Ptolemy Euer´getes, who came to avenge the deaths of his sister

and nephew. With the exception of part of Lydia and Phrygia, all Asia

west of the Tigris, and even Susiana, Media, and Persia, submitted to

the invader; but the severity of his exactions excited discontent, and

a revolt in Egypt called him home, whereupon Callinicus regained his

territories. Antiochus Hi´erax (the Hawk), a younger brother of the king,

revolted at fourteen years of age, with the assistance of his uncle and

a troop of Gauls. At the same time, Arsa´ces II., the Parthian king,

gained great advantages in Upper Asia, and signally defeated Callinicus

(B. C. 237), who led an expedition in person against him. The war between

the brothers ended, B. C. 229, in the defeat of the rebellious prince.

Seleucus died by a fall from his horse, B. C. 226.

Seleucus III. (Ceraunus) reigned only three years. In the midst of an

expedition against Attalus, king of Pergamus, he was killed in a mutiny

by some of his own officers.

=34.= Antiochus III., the Great, had an eventful reign of thirty-six

years. Molo, his general, first revolted, and made himself master, one by

one, of the countries east of the Euphrates, destroying all the armies

sent against him. Antiochus at length defeated him, B. C. 220, and then

made war upon Egypt for the recovery of Syria and Palestine, which had

hitherto been held by Ptolemy. He was successful at first, but his

defeat at Raph´ia robbed him of all his conquests, except Seleucia in

Syria. Achæ´us, his cousin, and hitherto a faithful servant of Antiochus

and his father, had meanwhile been driven into revolt by the false

accusations of Hermi´as, the prime minister. He subjected to his control

all the countries west of the Taurus. As soon as peace had been made

with Egypt, the king of Syria marched against him, deprived him of all

his possessions in one campaign, besieged him two years in Sardis, and

finally captured and put him to death.

=35.= The Parthian king, Arsaces III., had taken up arms against Media.

Antiochus led an army across the desert to Hecatom´pylos, the Parthian

capital, which he captured; but the battle which followed was indecisive,

and Arsaces remained independent, with the possession of Parthia and

Hyrcania. The war against the Bactrian monarch had a similar result,

Euthyde´mus retaining Bactria and Sogdiana. Antiochus penetrated India,

and renewed the old alliance of Seleucus Nicator with the king of the

upper Ganges. Wintering in Kerma´nia, the Syrian king made a naval

expedition, the next year, against the piratical Arabs of the western

shores of the Persian Gulf. On his return from his seven years’ absence

in the East, Antiochus received the title of “Great,” by which he is

known in history.

=36.= The same year, B. C. 205, Ptolemy Epiph´anes, a child of five

years, succeeded his father in Egypt. Tempted by the unprotected state of

the kingdom, Antiochus made a treaty with Philip of Macedon to divide the

dominions of Ptolemy between them. Philip’s designs were interrupted by a

war with Rome, the now powerful republic of the West. Antiochus carried

on the contest with great energy, but with varying success, in Cœle-Syria

and Palestine. By the decisive battle of Pa´neas, B. C. 198, he gained

complete possession of those provinces; but desiring to prosecute his

wars in another direction, he married his daughter Cleopatra to the young

king of Egypt, and promised the conquered country as her dower.

=37.= He then overran Asia Minor, and crossing the Hellespont, seized

the Thracian Chersonesus. The Romans, who had conquered Philip and

were guardians of Ptolemy, now sent an embassy to Antiochus, requiring

him to surrender all his conquests of territory belonging to either

prince, B. C. 196. Antiochus indignantly rejected their interference,

and prepared for war, with the aid of their great enemy, Hannibal, who

had taken refuge at his court. In 192 B. C., he crossed into Greece and

captured Chalcis; but he was signally defeated soon after by the Romans,

at Thermopylæ, and compelled to withdraw from Europe. They followed him

across the sea, and by two naval victories gained the western coast

of Asia Minor. The two Scip´ios crossed the Hellespont and defeated

Antiochus a fourth time, near Magnesia, in Lydia. He obtained peace only

by surrendering all Asia Minor except Cilicia, with his navy and all his

elephants, and by paying an enormous war indemnity. Twenty hostages were

given for the payment, among whom was Antiochus Epiphanes, the king’s

son. The king of Pergamus received the ceded provinces, and became a most

formidable rival to Syria. To meet his engagements with the Romans,

Antiochus plundered the temples of Asia, and in a commotion excited by

this means in Elyma´is, he lost his life.

=38.= Seleucus IV. (Philop´ator) had a reign of eleven years, unmarked by

important events. The kingdom was exhausted, and the Romans were ready to

seize any exposed province at the least hostile movement of the Syrians.

Heliodo´rus, the treasurer, at length murdered his master and assumed

the crown; but his usurpation was cut short by the arrival of Antiochus

Epiphanes, brother of the late king, who with the aid of Eumenes, king of

Pergamus, established himself upon the throne.

=39.= Antiochus IV. had been thirteen years a hostage at Rome, and

surprised his people by the Roman customs which he introduced. He made a

four years’ war against Egypt, and had nearly conquered the country when

the Romans interfered, and commanded him to give up all his conquests. He

was forced to obey, but he vented his rage upon the Jews, whose temple

he plundered and desecrated. They sprang to arms, under the leadership

of Mat´tathi´as, the priest, and his brave son, Judas Maccabæ´us, and

defeated the army sent to subdue them. Antiochus, who was now in the

East, set forth in person to avenge this insult to his authority. On his

way, he attempted to plunder the temple at Elymais, and was seized with

a furious insanity, in which he died. Both Jews and Greeks believed his

madness to be a judgment for his sacrilege.

=40.= Antiochus V. (Eu´pator), a boy of twelve years, came to the throne

under the control of Lys´ias, the regent. But his father, when dying, had

appointed him another guardian in the person of Philip, who returned to

Antioch bearing the royal signet, while the young king and his minister

were absent in Judæa. Lysias, on hearing this, hastened to make peace

with Judas Maccabæus, and turned back to fight with Philip, whom he

defeated and put to death. The Parthians, meanwhile, were overrunning the

kingdom on the east; and the Romans, on the west, were harshly enforcing

the terms of the treaty made by Antiochus the Great. Demetrius, the son

of Seleucus Philopator, now escaped from Rome, and gained possession

of the kingdom, after ordering the execution of both Eupator and his

guardian.

=41.= Demetrius I. spent some years in vain attempts to put down the

Jewish rebellion. His armies were defeated by Judas Maccabæus, and

the Romans entered into alliance with Judæa, which they now declared

an independent kingdom. The Syrian king was no more successful in

Cappadocia; and in Babylon, the satrap whom he had deposed set up

an impostor, Alexander Balas, who claimed to be a son of Antiochus

Epiphanes. Aided by the forces of Rome, Pergamus, Cappadocia, Egypt, and

Judæa, this man conquered Demetrius and kept the kingdom five years.

=42.= Alexander Balas proved unworthy of a crown, by leaving public

affairs in the weak and incompetent hands of his favorite, Ammo´nius,

while he abandoned himself to indolence and luxury. Demetrius Nica´tor,

eldest son of the former king, encouraged by the contempt of the Syrians

for the licentiousness of Alexander, landed in Cilicia and made war for

the recovery of his kingdom. Ptolemy of Egypt, who had entered Syria with

an army for the aid of his son-in-law, Alexander, became disgusted by his

ingratitude and came over to the side of Demetrius. A battle near Antioch

was decided in favor of the allies. Alexander fled into Arabia, where he

was assassinated by some of his own officers.

=43.= Demetrius II. (Nicator) ruled with such wanton cruelty as to

alienate his subjects. One of them, Diod´otus Tryphon, set up a rival

king in the person of Antiochus VI., a child two years of age, the son of

Alexander Balas. After three or four years he removed this infant monarch

and made himself king, with the aid of Judas Maccabæus. Demetrius, after

fighting ineffectually seven years against his rivals in the west, left

the regency of Syria to his wife, Cleopatra, while he turned against

the Parthians, who had nearly conquered his eastern provinces. He was

defeated and made prisoner by Arsaces VI., and remained ten years a

captive, though he was treated with all the honors of royalty, and

received a Parthian princess for his second wife.

=44.= Cleopatra, unable to wage war alone against Tryphon, called in

Antiochus Side´tes, her husband’s brother, who conquered the usurper

and seated himself on the vacant throne. He made war against the Jews,

and captured Jerusalem by a siege of nearly a year. He afterward turned

against the Parthians and gained some advantages, but he was finally

defeated and lost his life after a reign of nine years. Demetrius Nicator

had been released by the Parthian king, and now re-established himself

in Syria. But Ptolemy Phys´con, of Egypt, raised up a new pretender,

Zabi´nas, who defeated Demetrius at Damascus. Attempting to enter Tyre,

the Syrian king was captured and put to death.

=45.= Seleucus V., his eldest son, assumed the crown without the

permission of his mother, who thereupon caused him to be executed,

and associated with herself her second son, Antiochus VIII. (Grypus).

Zabinas, the pretender, reigned at the same time in part of Syria, until

he was defeated by Antiochus, and put to death by poison, B. C. 122. The

same year Cleopatra was detected in a plot against the life of her son,

and was herself executed.

=46.= Exhausted by long wars, and greatly reduced both in power and

extent, Syria now enjoyed eight years of peace. Judæa and the provinces

east of the Euphrates were wholly independent. The few Syrians who

possessed wealth were enfeebled by luxury, while the mass of the people

were crushed by want. In 114 B. C., Antiochus Cyzice´nus, a half-brother

of the king, revolted against him, and involved the country in another

bloody war of three years. The territory was then divided between

them; but war broke out afresh in 105 B. C., and continued nine years,

resulting in no gain to either party, but great loss and misery to the

nation. Tyre, Sidon, Seleucia, and the whole province of Cilicia became

independent. The Arabs on one side, and the Egyptians on the other,

ravaged the country at pleasure. At length the reign of Antiochus VIII.

was ended with his life, by Hera´cleon, an officer of his court, B. C. 96.

=47.= The murderer did not receive the reward of his crime, for Seleucus

VI. (Epiphanes), the eldest son of Grypus, gained possession of the

kingdom. In two years he conquered Cyzicenus, who committed suicide to

avoid capture; but the claims of the rival house were still maintained

by Antiochus X. (Eu´sebes), his eldest son. Seleucus was now driven

into Cilicia. Here he came to a miserable end, for he was burnt alive

by the people of a town from which he had demanded a subsidy. Philip,

the brother of Seleucus, and second son of Antiochus Grypus, became

king, and with the aid of his younger brothers continued the war against

Eusebes. This prince was defeated and driven to take refuge in Parthia.

But no peace came to the country, for Philip and his brothers, Antiochus

XI., Demetrius, and Antiochus XII., made war with each other, until the

unhappy Syrians called upon Tigra´nes, king of Armenia, to end their

miseries.

=48.= Tigranes governed, wisely and well, fourteen years (B. C. 83-69);

but having at length incurred the vengeance of the Romans, by rendering

aid to his father-in-law, Mithridates of Pontus, he was forced to give up

all except his hereditary kingdom. Four years longer (B. C. 69-65), Syria

continued its separate existence, under Antiochus XIII. (Asiaticus), the

son of Eusebes. At the end of that time the kingdom was subdued by Pompey

the Great, and became a Roman province.

RECAPITULATION.

Seleucus I. (B. C. 312-281) extended his empire beyond the

Indus, built many cities, gained all Asia Minor by the

defeat of Lysimachus. Antiochus I. (B. C. 280-261) lost the

territories of Pergamus and Galatia; Antiochus II. (261-246),

those of Parthia and Bactria. Under Seleucus II. (246-226), the

greater part of the empire was conquered by Ptolemy, but soon

recovered. Seleucus III. reigned three years (B. C. 226-223).

Antiochus III. (B C. 223-187) quelled the revolts of Molo

and Achæus; had wars with the kings of Parthia and Bactria;

penetrated India as far as the Ganges; punished the pirates of

the Persian Gulf; wrested from Egypt the provinces of Syria

and Palestine; overran Asia Minor, and invaded Greece. He

was defeated by the Romans, twice by sea and twice by land.

Seleucus IV. (B. C. 187-176) was murdered by his treasurer,

Heliodorus. Antiochus IV. (B. C. 176-164) was prevented by the

Romans from conquering Egypt; excited by his persecutions a

revolt in Judæa, which became independent under the Maccabees.

The short reign of Antiochus V. (B. C. 164-162) was filled

with wars of the regents. His uncle, Demetrius I. (B. C.

162-151), had unsuccessful wars with the Jews and Cappadocians;

was conquered by Alexander Balas, who reigned B. C. 151-146.

Demetrius II. had a disputed reign (B. C. 146-140); a ten

years’ imprisonment in Parthia (B. C. 140-130), while his wife

and his brother, Antiochus VII., ruled Syria; and a second

contest with a pretender, B. C. 129-126. Antiochus VIII. (B.

C. 126-96) reigned five years jointly with his mother, seven

years alone, and eighteen years side by side with his brother,

Antiochus IX. (Cyzicenus), who ruled Cœle-Syria and Phœnicia,

B. C. 111-96. Seleucus V. (B. C. 96, 95) conquered Cyzicenus,

but carried on the same war with his son, Eusebes, until his

own violent death. His younger brothers fought first Eusebes,

and then each other, until Tigranes, king of Armenia, conquered

the country and ruled it fourteen years (B. C. 83-69).

Antiochus XIII. the last of the Seleucidæ, reigned B. C. 69-65.

II. EGYPT UNDER THE PTOLEMIES. B. C. 323-30.

=49.= The Macedonian Kingdom in Egypt presented a marked and brilliant

contrast to the native empires and the Persian satrapy. By removing the

capital to Alexandria, the conqueror had provided for free intercourse

with foreign countries, and the old exclusiveness of the Egyptians was

forever broken down. While Palestine was attached to this kingdom,

especial favor was shown to the Jews; and in the Greek conquerors, the

native Egyptians, and the Jewish merchants, the three families of Shem,

Ham, and Japhet were reunited as they had never been since the dispersion

at Babel. The Egyptians, who had abhorred the Persian dominion, hailed

the Macedonians as deliverers; the common people engaged with zeal in the

new industries that promised wealth as the reward of enterprise, and the

learned class found their delight in the intellectual society, as well as

the rare treasures of literature and art, that filled the court of the

Ptolemies.

=50.= Ptolemy I. (Soter[59]) received the Egyptian province immediately

upon the death of Alexander, and proceeded to organize it with great

energy and wisdom. Desiring to make Egypt a maritime power, he sought at

once to conquer Palestine, Phœnicia, and Cyprus, whose forests were as

needful to him for ship-building as their sea-faring people for sailors.

The two countries on the mainland were occupied by Ptolemy in 320 B. C.,

and remained six years in his possession. They were lost in the war with

Antigonus, and only fully regained after the battle of Ipsus, B. C. 301.

Cyprus was the scene of many conflicts, of which the great naval battle

off Salamis, B. C. 306, was the most severe and decisive. It was then

lost to Egypt, but in B. C. 294 or 293 it was regained, and continued her

most valuable foreign possession as long as the kingdom existed. Cyrene

and all the Libyan tribes between it and Egypt were also annexed by

Ptolemy.

=51.= Few changes were made in the internal government of Egypt. The

country, as before, was divided into nomes, each having its own ruler,

who was usually a native Egyptian. The old laws and worship prevailed.

The Ptolemies rebuilt the temples, paid especial honors to the Apis, and

made the most of all points of resemblance between the Greek and Egyptian

religions. A magnificent temple to Sera´pis was erected at Alexandria.

The priests retained their privileges and honors, being exempt from

all taxation. The army was chiefly, and its officers wholly, Greek or

Macedonian, and all civil dignities of any importance were also filled

by the conquering people. The Greek inhabitants of the cities alone

possessed entire freedom in the management of their affairs.

=52.= Ptolemy followed the liberal policy of Alexander toward men of

genius and learning. He collected a vast and precious library, which

he placed in a building connected with the palace; and he founded the

“Museum,” which drew students and professors from all parts of the

world. No spot ever witnessed more literary and intellectual activity

than Alexandria, the University of the East. There Euclid first unfolded

the “Elements of Geometry”; Eratos´thenes discoursed of Geography;

Hipparchus, of Astronomy; Aristoph´anes and Aristar´chus, of Criticism;

Man´etho, of History; while Apel´les and Antiph´ilus added their

paintings, and Phile´tas, Callim´achus, and Apollonius their poems,

for the delight of a court whose monarch was himself an author, and in

which talent constituted rank. Alexandria during this reign was adorned

with many costly and magnificent works. The royal palace; the Museum;

the great light-house on the island of Pharos, which has given its name

to many similar constructions in modern times; the mole or causeway

which connected this island with the mainland; the Hip´podrome, and the

Mausole´um, containing the tomb of Alexander, were among the chief.

Ptolemy Soter was distinguished by his truth and magnanimity from most of

the princes and generals of his age. His unlimited power never led him to

cruelty or self-indulgence. He died at the age of eighty-four, B. C. 283.

=53.= Ptolemy II. (Philadelphus), through the influence of his mother,

had been raised to the throne two years before his father’s death,

instead of his elder brother, Ceraunus. He had been carefully educated

by several of the learned men whom the patronage of his father had drawn

to the court; and he continued, on a still more liberal scale, that

encouragement of science and literature which had already made Alexandria

a successful rival of Athens. He so greatly increased the Alexandrian

Library that he is often mentioned as its founder. Agents were appointed

to search Europe and Asia for every literary work of value, and to secure

it at any cost. An embassy was sent to the high priest at Jerusalem to

bring a copy of the Holy Scriptures, together with a company of learned

men who could translate them into Greek. The translators were entertained

by the king with the greatest honor. The first five books were completed

in the reign of Philadelphus, the rest were translated by order of the

later Ptolemies; and the entire version—still an invaluable treasure

to Biblical scholars—is known as the Sep´tuagint, either from the

seventy translators, or because it was authorized by the San´hedrim of

Alexandria, which consisted of the same number.

=54.= Ptolemy II. was engaged in various wars; first for the furtherance

of the Achæan League, and the protection of the Greeks against Macedonian

aggressions; afterward against his half-brother, Magas, king of Cyrene,

and the kings of Syria, with whom Magas was allied. He gained possession

of the whole coast of Asia Minor, with many of the Cyclades. By the

wisdom of his internal policy, Egypt was meanwhile raised to her highest

pitch of wealth and prosperity. He re-opened the canal made by Rameses

the Great (see Book I, §§ 153, 154), and built the port of Arsinoë, on

the site of the modern Suez. To avoid the dangers of Red Sea navigation,

he founded two cities, named Berenice, farther to the southward, and

connected one of them by a highway with Coptos on the Nile. Egypt thus

reaped the full commercial advantage of her position midway between the

East and the West. For centuries the rich productions of India, Arabia,

and Ethiopia were conveyed along these various highways to Alexandria,

whence they were distributed to Syria, Greece, and Rome. The revenues of

Egypt were equal to those which Darius had derived from the vast empire

of Persia.

=55.= The personal character of Philadelphus was less admirable than that

of his father. He killed two of his brothers, banished a most faithful

counselor, and by marrying his own sister, Arsinoë, introduced a custom

which caused untold misery and mischief in the kingdom. He died B. C.

247, having reigned thirty-eight years, or thirty-six from the death of

his father.

=56.= Ptolemy III. (Euergetes) was the most enterprising monarch of his

race, and pushed the boundaries of his kingdom to their greatest extent.

He gained the Cyr´ena´ica by marriage with the daughter of Magas, and

annexed portions of Ethiopia and Arabia. In his war against Syria to

avenge his sister Berenice (see §§ 32, 33), he even passed the Euphrates

and conquered all the country to the borders of Bactria; but he lost all

this by his sudden recall to Egypt. His conquests on the sea-board, which

could be defended by his fleet, remained permanently in his possession.

All the shores of the Mediterranean, from Cyrene to the Hellespont,

with many important islands, and even a portion of Europe, including

Lysimachia in Thrace, belonged to his dominion.

He continued the patronage of art and letters, and enriched the

Alexandrian libraries with many rare manuscripts. The Egyptians were

still more gratified by the recovery of some ancient images of their

gods, which had been carried away to Assyria by Sargon or Esarhaddon,

and were brought back by Ptolemy from his eastern campaign. Euergetes

died B. C. 222, after a prosperous reign of twenty-five years; and with

him ended the glory of the Macedonian monarchy in Egypt. “Historians

reckon nine Ptolemies after Euergetes. Except Philome´tor, who was mild

and humane; Lath´yrus, who was amiable but weak; and Ptolemy XII.,

who was merely young and incompetent, they were all, almost equally,

detestable.”

=57.= Ptolemy IV. was suspected of having murdered his father, and

therefore took the surname Philopator to allay suspicion. He began his

reign, however, by murdering his mother, his brother, and his uncle,

and marrying his sister Arsinoë. A few years later she, too, was put

to death, at the instigation of a worthless favorite of the king. The

control of affairs was left to Sosib´ius, a minister who was equally

wicked and incompetent. Through his neglect, the army became weakened by

lack of discipline, and the Syrians seized the opportunity to recover

their lost possessions. They were defeated, however, at Raph´ia, and

gained only their port of Seleucia. A revolt of the native Egyptians

occupied many years of this reign.

=58.= Ptolemy V. (Epiphanes) was only five years old at his father’s

death. The kings of Syria and Macedon plotted to divide his dominions

between them, and the only resource of the incompetent ministers was to

call the Romans to their aid. All the foreign dependencies, except Cyprus

and the Cyrenaica, were lost; but by the good management of M. Lep´idus,

Egypt was saved to the little Ptolemy. Aristom´enes, an Acarnanian,

succeeded Lepidus as regent, and his energy and justice restored for a

time the prosperity of the kingdom. At the age of fourteen, Epiphanes

was declared of age, and the government was thenceforth in his name. Few

events of his reign are known. He married Cleopatra of Syria, and soon

after poisoned his late guardian, Aristomenes. His plans for a war with

Syria were prevented by his own assassination, B. C. 181.

=59.= Ptolemy VI. (Philometor) became king at the age of seven, under

the vigorous regency of his mother, Cleopatra. She died B. C. 173, and

the power passed into the hands of two weak and corrupt ministers, who

involved the kingdom in war, and almost in ruin, by their rash invasion

of Syria. Antiochus IV. defeated them at Pelusium, and advancing to

Memphis, gained possession of the young king, whom he used as a tool for

the reduction of the whole country. The Alexandrians crowned Ptolemy

Physcon, a younger brother of the king, and successfully withstood the

besieging army of Antiochus. The Romans now interposing, he was obliged

to retreat.

The two brothers agreed to reign together, and prepared for war with

Antiochus. He captured Cyprus, invaded Egypt a second time, and would

doubtless have added the entire dominion of the Ptolemies to his own,

if the Romans, who claimed the protectorate of Egypt, had not again

interfered and commanded him to withdraw. The Syrian king reluctantly

obeyed, and the brothers reigned four years in peace. They then

quarreled, and Philometor went to plead his cause before the Roman

Senate. The Romans re-instated him in the possession of Egypt, giving

to his brother Physcon Libya and the Cyrenaica. Dissatisfied with his

portion, Physcon went to Rome and obtained a further grant of Cyprus; but

Philometor refused to give it up, and the brothers were preparing for

war, when a revolt in Cyrene engaged the attention of its king. After

nine years he renewed his claim, and obtained from Rome a small squadron

to aid in the capture of the island. He was defeated and made prisoner by

his brother; but his life was spared, and he was restored to his kingdom

of Cyrene. Philometor fell, B. C. 146, in a battle near Antioch, with

Alexander Balas, whom he had himself encouraged to assume the crown of

Syria. (See § 42.)

=60.= Ptolemy VII. (Eupator) had reigned but a few days when he was

murdered by his uncle, Ptolemy Physcon, who, aided by the Romans, united

in himself the two kingdoms, Egypt and Cyrene. This monster created such

terror by his inhuman cruelties, and such disgust by his excesses, that

his capital became half depopulated, and the citizens who remained were

almost constantly in revolt. At last he was forced to take refuge in

Cyprus, the crown remaining to his sister, Cleopatra. To wound the queen

most deeply, he murdered her son, and sent her the head and hands of the

victim. The Alexandrians were so enraged by this atrocity, that they

fought bravely for Cleopatra; but when she applied for aid to the king of

Syria, they became alarmed and recalled Physcon, after an exile of three

years. Warned by his punishment, Physcon now desisted from his cruelties,

and devoted himself to literary pursuits, even gaining some reputation as

an author.

=61.= Ptolemy VIII. (Lath´yrus) succeeded his father in Egypt, while his

brother Alexander reigned in Cyprus, and A´pion, another son of Physcon,

received the Cyrenaica. Cleopatra, the queen mother, had the real power.

After ten years, Lathyrus offended his mother by pursuing a policy of

his own, and was compelled to change places with Alexander, who reigned

eighteen years in Egypt, with the title of Ptolemy IX. Cleopatra was

then put to death, Alexander expelled, and Ptolemy Lathyrus recalled. He

reigned eight years as sole monarch, defeated Alexander, who attempted to

regain Cyprus, and punished a revolt in Thebes by a siege of three years,

ending with the destruction of the city, B. C. 89-86.

=62.= Berenice, the only legitimate child of Lathyrus, reigned six

months alone, and was then married and associated upon the throne with

her cousin, Ptolemy X., a son of Alexander, whose claims were supported

by the Romans. Within three weeks he put his wife to death, and the

Alexandrians, revolting, slew him in the gymnasium, B. C. 80. Fifteen

years of great confusion followed, during which the succession was

disputed by at least five claimants, and Cyprus became a separate kingdom.

=63.= Ptolemy XI. (Aule´tes, or the Flute-Player) then obtained the

crown, and dated his reign from the death of his half-sister, Berenice.

In 59 B. C., he was acknowledged by the Romans; but by that time his

oppressive and profligate government had so disgusted the people, that

they drove him from the kingdom. He took refuge four years in Rome, while

his two daughters nominally governed Egypt, first jointly, and then the

younger alone, after her sister’s death. In 55 B. C. Auletes returned,

supported by a Roman army, put to death his daughter, who had opposed his

restoration, and reigned under Roman protection three and a half years.

He died, B. C. 51, leaving four children: the famous Cleopatra, aged

seventeen; Ptolemy XII.; another Ptolemy, and a daughter Arsinoë, still

younger.

[Illustration: Coin of Antony and Cleopatra, twice the size.]

=64.= The princess Cleopatra received the crown under Roman patronage,

in conjunction with the elder Ptolemy. The brother and sister quarreled,

and Cleopatra was driven into Syria. Here she met Julius Cæsar, and by

her talents and accomplishments gained great ascendency over his mind. By

his aid Ptolemy was conquered and slain, and Cleopatra established in the

kingdom. She removed her younger brother by poison, and had thenceforth

no rival. With consummate ability, mixed with the unscrupulous cruelty

of her race, she reigned seventeen years in great prosperity. Cæsar

was her protector while he lived, and Antony then became her slave,

sacrificing all his interests, and his honor as a Roman and a general, to

her slightest caprices. In the civil wars of Rome, Antony was at length

defeated at Actium; Cleopatra committed suicide, and her kingdom became a

Roman province, B. C. 30.

=65.= The kingdom of the Ptolemies had continued 293 years, from the

death of Alexander to that of Cleopatra. During 101 years, under the

first three kings, it was the most flourishing, well organized, and

prosperous of the Macedonian monarchies; the nearly two centuries which

remained were among the most degraded periods in the history of the human

race.

RECAPITULATION.

Prosperity of Egypt under the Ptolemies. Concourse of races at

Alexandria. Ptolemy I. (B. C. 323-283) conquered Palestine,

Phœnicia, Cyprus, and the African coast as far as Cyrene. Old

laws and worship retained. Alexandrian Library and Museum,

professors and public works. Ptolemy Philadelphus (B. C.

283-247) ordered a Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures;

constructed cities, roads, and canals for purposes of

commerce. Acquisitions of Ptolemy III. (B. C. 247-222). Rapid

conquests in Asia, speedily lost. Collection of manuscripts

and recovery of images. Decline of the Ptolemaic kingdom.

Crimes of Ptolemy IV. (B. C. 222-205). Victory at Raphia, B.

C. 217. Roman interference during the minority of Ptolemy V.

(B. C. 205-181). Ptolemy VI. (B. C. 181-146) taken by Antiochus

IV., of Syria. His brother Physcon crowned. Rome protected

Egyptian dependencies against Syria, and divided them between

the brothers. Ptolemy VII. was murdered by his uncle, Ptolemy

Physcon, who reigned B. C. 146-117. He was exiled for his

crimes, but recalled in three years. Ptolemy VIII. and his

brother Alexander reigned alternately in Egypt and Cyprus

while their mother lived (B. C. 117-89). After her death, the

former was sole monarch until B. C. 81. Berenice reigned six

months (B. C. 81, 80), and was then murdered by her husband,

Ptolemy X. He was slain by the Alexandrians. Ptolemy XI. (B. C.

80-51) made good his claim after fifteen years’ anarchy; was

acknowledged by the Romans, but expelled (B. C. 59-55) by his

subjects; returned to reign under Roman protection. Cleopatra

poisoned her two brothers, and by favor of Cæsar and Antony

kept her kingdom twenty-one years, B. C. 51-30.

III. MACEDONIA AND GREECE.

=66.= Upon the death of Alexander, the greater part of Greece revolted

against Macedon, Athens, as of old, being the leader. Antipater, the

Macedonian regent, was defeated near Thermopylæ, and besieged in Lamia,

in Thessaly. The confederates were afterward worsted at Cranon, and the

good management of Antipater dissolved the league by treating with its

members separately, and offering the most lenient terms to all except the

leaders. Athens suffered the punishment she had often inflicted. Twelve

thousand of her citizens were forcibly removed to Thrace, Illyria, Italy,

and Africa, only nine thousand of the wealthier sort being left, who

willingly submitted to the Macedonian supremacy. Demosthenes, with the

principal members of his party, were executed, and the last remains of

Athenian independence destroyed.

=67.= The wars of the generals and the intrigues of the Macedonian

princesses belong to Period II. (See §§ 19-25.) Three years after the

battle of Ipsus, Cassander died, B. C. 298, leaving the crown to his

son, Philip IV. The young king reigned less than a year, and his mother,

Thessalonica, then divided Macedonia between her two remaining sons,

Antipater and Alexander. The former, being dissatisfied with his portion,

murdered his mother and called in his father-in-law, Lysimachus, to aid

him in gaining the whole. His brother, at the same time, asked aid of

Demetrius, who reigned in Greece, and of Pyrrhus, king of Epirus. With

their help he drove Antipater out of Macedonia; but he gained nothing by

the victory, for Demetrius had undertaken the war solely with the view of

placing himself upon the throne, which he accomplished by the murder of

Alexander. Antipater II. was put to death the same year by Lysimachus, B.

C. 294.

=68.= The kingdom now included Thessaly, Attica, and the greater part

of the Peloponnesus, Pyrrhus having received several countries on the

western coast of Greece. Demetrius, however, sacrificed all his dominions

to his unbounded ambition and conceit. He failed in an attack on Pyrrhus,

and being invaded both from the east and west, was compelled to abandon

Macedonia, B. C. 287. In a later expedition into Asia, he became the

prisoner of Seleucus, and died in the third year of his captivity. (See §

29.)

=69.= Pyrrhus remained king of the greater part of Macedonia nearly a

year, but was then driven back to his hereditary kingdom by Lysimachus,

who thus extended his own dominions from the Halys to Mount Pindus, B.

C. 286. The capital of this consolidated kingdom was Lysimachia, in the

Chersonese, and Macedonia for five years was merely a province. The

nobles, becoming discontented, called in Seleucus, who defeated and

killed Lysimachus, B. C. 281.

=70.= For a few weeks the aged Seleucus governed nearly all the dominions

of Alexander, except Egypt. He was then assassinated by Ptolemy

Ceraunus,[60] who became king in his stead. The Egyptian prince was soon

overwhelmed by a new peril in the invasion of the Gauls. This restless

people had been pouring for nearly a century into northern Italy, where

they had driven out the Etruscans from the plain of the Po, and given

their own name to Gallia Cisalpina. Now turning eastward, they occupied

the plain of the Danube, and pressed southward as far as Illyricum,

whence they proceeded in three divisions, one falling upon the Thracians,

another upon the Pæonians, and a third upon the Macedonians. The last

army encountered Ptolemy Ceraunus, who was defeated and slain in battle.

For two years they ravaged Macedonia, while Melea´ger, a brother of

Ceraunus, and Antipater, a nephew of Cassander, successively occupied the

throne, B. C. 279-277.

=71.= Brennus, a Gallic leader, with more than 200,000 men, marched

through Thessaly, laying all waste with fire and sword. A furious battle

took place at Thermopylæ, and the Gauls, at last, only gained the rear

of the Greek army by the same mountain path which had admitted the

troops of Xerxes two hundred years before. Brennus pushed on to plunder

Delphi, but an army of 4,000, well posted upon the heights of Parnassus,

withstood him with success; and a violent wintry storm, which confused

and benumbed the assailants, convinced devout Greeks that Apollo was once

more defending his sanctuary. The Gallic leader was severely wounded,

and unwilling to survive his disgrace, put an end to his own life. His

army broke up into a multitude of marauding bands, without order or

discipline, and the greater part perished from cold, hunger, or battle.

Their countrymen, however, established a kingdom in Thrace; and another

band, invited into Asia Minor by Nicomedes, became possessed of a large

tract of country, which received their name as Gala´tia.

=72.= During the disorders in Macedonia, Sosthenes, an officer of noble

birth, had been placed at the head of affairs, instead of Antipater, who

was deposed for his incapacity. After the Gauls had retired, Antipater

regained the throne. But Antigonus Gonatas, who had maintained himself

as an independent prince in central and southern Greece, ever since the

captivity of his father, Demetrius, now appeared with an army composed

mainly of Gallic mercenaries, defeated Antipater, and gained possession

of Macedonia. Antiochus Soter made war against him, but was opposed

with so much energy that he acknowledged Antigonus as king, and gave

him his sister Phila in marriage. But Antigonus was never acceptable to

either Greeks or Macedonians, and when Pyrrhus, the most popular prince

of his age, returned from Italy, the whole Macedonian army was ready to

desert to his side. Antigonus was defeated, and for a year or more was a

fugitive, B. C. 273-271.

=73.= Pyrrhus was the greatest warrior and one of the best princes of

his time—a time from which truth and fidelity seemed almost to have

disappeared. He might have become the most powerful monarch in the world,

if his perseverance had been equal to his talents and ambition. But

instead of organizing the territory he possessed, he was ever thirsting

for new conquests. In a war upon southern Greece he was repulsed from

Sparta, and in attempting to seize Argos by night, he was killed by a

tile thrown by a woman from a house-top.

=74.= Antigonus Gonatas now returned and reigned thirty-two years. He

extended his power over most of the Peloponnesus, and waged war five

years against the Athenians, who were aided by Sparta and Egypt. In the

meantime, Antigonus was recalled by the incursion of Alexander, son of

Pyrrhus, who was carrying all before him, and had been acknowledged king

of Macedon. Demetrius, son of Antigonus, chased him out of Macedonia,

and even out of Epirus; and though he was soon restored to his paternal

dominion, he remained thenceforth at peace with his neighbors. Athens

fell in 263 B. C. Nineteen years later, Antigonus gained possession of

Corinth; but this was the last of his successes.

=75.= The Achæan League, which had been suppressed by the immediate

successors of Alexander, had soon revived, and extended itself beyond the

limits of Achaia, receiving cities from all the Peloponnesus. In 243 B.

C., Ara´tus, its head, by a sudden and well-concerted movement captured

Corinth, which immediately joined the League. Several important cities

followed the example; and Antigonus, who had grown old and cautious,

was unable to oppose them, except by stirring up Ætolia to attack the

Achæans. He died B. C. 239, having lived eighty and reigned thirty-seven

years.

=76.= Demetrius II. allied himself with Epirus, and broke friendship with

the Ætolians, who were enemies of that kingdom. The consequence was, that

the Ætolians made a junction with the Achæan League to oppose him. He

was able to defeat them in Thessaly and Bœotia, but south of the isthmus

the ascendency of Macedon was at an end. The Romans now for the first

time interfered in Grecian affairs, by requiring the Ætolian confederacy

to abstain from aggressions upon Acarnania. Corcyra, Apollonia, and

Epidamnus fell into their hands, B. C. 228, a year after the death of

Demetrius II.

=77.= Philip V. was but eight years old when he inherited his father’s

dominions, under the guardianship of his kinsman, Antigonus Doson.

During this regency great changes took place in Sparta, which led to

a brief return of her old energy. The laws of Lycurgus had continued

in force more than five centuries, but the time of their fitness and

usefulness had passed away. The rigid separation which they made between

the different classes, now limited the number of true Spartans to 700,

while the property tests were so severe, that only 100 enjoyed the full

rights of citizens. The wealth of the community was concentrated in the

hands of a few, who violated the old law by living in great luxury. In

this condition, Sparta was unable even to defend herself against Illyrian

pirates or Ætolian marauders, still less to exert any influence, as of

old, in the general affairs of Greece.

The reforms proposed B. C. 230, by Agis IV., and carried, four years

later, by Cleomenes, added 3,800 _periϫci_ to the number of citizens,

and re-divided the lands of the state between these and 15,000 selected

Laconians. Debts were abolished, and the old simple and frugal customs

of Lycurgus restored. Sparta was now able to defeat the forces of the

Achæan League, and to draw from it, into her own alliance, most of the

Peloponnesian towns out of Achaia. But Aratus, the head of the League,

violated all its principles by calling in Antigonus, the Macedonian

regent, and putting him in possession of Acro-Corinthus. In the battle of

Sella´sia, B. C. 221, Cleomenes was defeated, and forced to take refuge

at the court of Ptolemy Philopator. The League which had been created

to defend the liberties of Greece, had betrayed them; and there was no

longer any hope either of restoring the glories of Sparta, or of checking

the overwhelming power of Macedon and Rome.

=78.= Antigonus died B. C. 220, and Philip, now seventeen years of age,

assumed the government. The great advantages gained during the regency

were soon lost by his rashness. He hastily allied himself with Hannibal

against Rome, and then with Antiochus of Syria against Egypt. (See §§ 37,

59.) His first war, however, was against Ætolia, which had sprung to arms

immediately upon his accession, hoping at once to overbalance its rival,

Achaia, and to increase its own territories at the expense of Macedon. As

early as the time of Alexander the Great, the Ætolian tribes had formed

themselves into a federal republic, which occupied a similar position

in central Greece to that of the Achæan League in the Peloponnesus. By

the subjection or annexation of several states, it was now extended from

the Ionian to the Ægean Sea. Philip overran Ætolia with great energy,

captured its seat of government, and by his brilliant successes showed a

military talent worthy of the early days of Macedonian conquest. But the

news of a great victory gained by Hannibal at Lake Thrasyme´ne, recalled

his attention to the object of his chief ambition, a war with Rome.

=79.= The first movement in the new war was the siege of Apollonia, a

Roman colony in Illyricum. Philip hoped to drive the Romans from the

western coast of Greece, and thus prepare the way for an invasion of

Italy. His camp was surprised at night by Vale´rius, and he was forced

to burn his ships and retreat in all haste. The Ætolians and all their

allies—Sparta, Elis, and the kings of Illyricum and Pergamus—took sides

with Rome, and carried the war into Macedonia, forcing Philip to ask

the aid of Carthage. The Romans captured Zacynthus, Ne´sos and Œniadæ,

Antic´yra in Locris, and the island of Ægina, and presented all to the

Ætolians.

At this crisis, Philopϫmen, the greatest Greek of his time, became

commander of the Achæan cavalry, and, two years later, the head of the

League. He improved the drill and tactics of the army, and infused new

spirit into the whole nation. His invasion of Elis, in concert with

Philip, was unsuccessful, and the king was defeated by Sulpic´ius Galba;

but, in 207 B. C., the great victory of Mantinea placed the Macedonians

and Achæans on a more equal footing with the Romans. Peace was made on

terms honorable to all parties.

=80.= Philip, spoiled by ambition, had become unscrupulous and reckless.

Instead of securing what he already possessed, he continually grasped

after new conquests; and disregarding the storm that was sure to burst

upon him sooner or later from the west, he now turned to the east and

south. He made a treaty with Antiochus the Great for a partition of the

Egyptian dependencies, by which he was to receive Thrace and the western

part of Asia Minor. This led at once to war with At´talus of Pergamus,

an ally of Rome, as well as with Rhodes, which took the part of Egypt.

His fleet was signally defeated off Chios, B. C. 201; and though he

afterward gained a victory at Lade, his losses were not retrieved. He

captured, however, the important islands of Samos, Thasos, and Chios,

with the province of Caria, and several places in Ionia.

=81.= The great disaster of the war was the rupture of the treaty with

Rome. That power interfered in behalf of her allies, Egypt, Rhodes, and

Pergamus; and when Philip rejected all reasonable demands, she declared

the peace at an end. In the second war with Rome, Greece was at first

divided into three parties, some states remaining neutral, some siding

with Rome, and some with Macedon. But when the consul, Fla´mini´nus,

proclaimed liberty to all the Greeks, and declared himself their champion

against the long detested power of Macedon, nearly every state went over

to the Roman side. On the land, Macedonia was attacked by Sulpicius

Galba, aided by the Illyrians and Dardanians; while by sea, a Roman

fleet, increased by Rhodian and Pergamene vessels, threatened the coast.

Several important towns in Eubœa were taken, but the great decisive

battle was fought (B. C. 197) at Cynocephalæ, where Philip was defeated

and his power utterly prostrated. He was compelled to abandon all the

Greek cities which he held, either in Europe or Asia, to surrender

his entire navy, and to pay a war indemnity of one thousand talents

($1,250,000).

=82.= In settling the affairs of Greece, the Romans subdivided the

states into still smaller sections than of old, and guaranteed perfect

independence to each. The two leagues of Achaia and Ætolia were, however,

left to balance each other. The states were generally satisfied with the

arrangement, but the Ætolians stirred up a new war in the very year of

Flamininus’s departure, and called in Antiochus from Asia to their aid.

He was defeated at Thermopylæ by the Romans, B. C. 191, and the great

battle of Magnesia, in the following year, ended all hope of resistance

to the power of Rome. The Achæan League, sustained by the wise and able

management of Philopœmen, gained in power by the weakening of its rival,

and now included the whole Peloponnesus, with Megaris and some other

territories beyond the peninsula.

=83.= Philip had aided the Romans in the recent war, and had been

permitted to extend his dominions over part of Thrace, and southward

into Thessaly. But when peace was secured, he was required to give

up all except his hereditary kingdom. Demetrius, the second son of

Philip, had long been a hostage at Rome, and acted now as his father’s

ambassador. The Roman Senate conceded many points, for the sake of the

warm friendship which it professed for this young prince; but its favor

only aroused the suspicions of his father and the jealousy of his elder

brother, Per´seus. The latter forged letters to convince his father

of the treason of Demetrius, and the innocent youth was put to death

by order of the king. But the grief and remorse of Philip exceeded

all bounds, when he learned the deception that had been practiced. He

believed that he was haunted by the spirit of Demetrius, and it was agony

of mind, rather than bodily illness, that soon occasioned his death.

An ancient historian remarked that there were few monarchs of whom more

good or more evil could justly be said, than of Philip V. If the promise

of his youth had been fulfilled, and the opportunities of his reign

improved, he would have done great things for Macedonia and Greece. But

his talents became obscured by drunkenness and profligacy, his natural

generosity was spoiled by the habit of supreme command, and he became in

later years a gloomy, unscrupulous, and suspicious tyrant.

=84.= Philip had designed to punish the crime of Perseus by leaving

the throne to a distant relative, Antigonus; but the sudden death of

the father, while Antigonus was absent from court, enabled the son to

make himself king without opposition. He pursued with much diligence

the policy of Philip, in preparing Macedonia for a second struggle with

Rome. The revenues were increased by a careful working of the mines;

the population, wasted by so many wars, was recruited by colonies of

Thracians and others; and close alliances were made with the kings of

Asia, and with the hardy barbarians of the north, Gauls, Illyrians, and

Germans, whose aid might be invaluable when the decisive moment should

arrive. But Perseus failed to unite the states of Greece, in which a

large party already preferred his supremacy to that of Rome; and instead

of using his treasures to satisfy and confirm his allies, he hoarded them

penuriously, only to enrich his enemies at the end of the war.

=85.= In the spring of 171 B. C., the Romans landed in Epirus, and spent

some months in winning the Greek states to their side by money and

influence. In the autumn they met Perseus in Thessaly, with nearly equal

forces, and were defeated. The Macedonian made no use, however, of his

victory, and nothing of importance was done for two years. In 168 B. C.,

L. Æmil´ius Paulus assumed the command, and forced Perseus to a battle

near Pydna. Here the fate of Macedon was finally decided. Perseus was

defeated and fled to Samothrace, where he was soon captured with all

his treasures. He was taken to Rome, and compelled to walk in chains in

the splendid triumph of Æmilius. After several years, the last of the

Macedonian kings died in imprisonment at Alba.

Macedonia was not immediately made a Roman province, but was divided into

four distinct states, which were forbidden all intercourse with each

other. The people were consoled by a great reduction in the taxes, the

Romans demanding only half the amount which they had been accustomed to

pay their native kings.

=86.= In Greece, all confederacies, except the Achæan League, were

dissolved. Achaia had been the constant friend of Rome during the war;

but to insure its submission, one thousand of the principal citizens

were accused of having secretly aided Perseus, and were carried to Italy

for trial. They were imprisoned seventeen years without a hearing; and

then, when all but three hundred had died, these were sent back, in the

certainty that their resentment against Rome would lead them to some rash

act of hostility.

All happened as the Romans had foreseen. The three of the exiles who

were most embittered by this unprovoked outrage came into power, and

their enmity gave to their foes what they most desired, a pretext for

an armed invasion of the territories of the League. In 146 B. C., war

was declared. One of the Achæan leaders was disastrously defeated and

slain near Thermopylæ; another, with the remnant of the army, made a last

stand at Corinth, but he was defeated and the city was taken, plundered,

and destroyed. Within a few years Greece was placed under proconsular

government, like other provinces of Rome. It remained nearly sixteen

centuries a part of that great empire, which, though driven from Italy,

maintained its existence in the East, until it was overthrown by the

Turks, A. D. 1453.

RECAPITULATION.

Lamian War ended in the subjection of Greece to Macedonia.

Cassander reigned B. C. 316-297. Death of all his sons within

three years, left the crown to Demetrius, son of Antigonus,

(B. C. 294-287,) who lost it by rash enterprises, and died

a prisoner in Asia. Pyrrhus, the Epirote, reigned a year.

Macedonia was then annexed to Thrace (B. C. 286-281). On the

death of Lysimachus, it fell to Seleucus, who was murdered

in turn by Ptolemy Ceraunus. In the reign of Ptolemy (B.

C. 281-279), Meleager, Antipater II., and Sosthenes (B. C.

279-277), the Gauls ravaged Macedonia and Greece, gained

Thermopylæ, but were defeated at Delphi. Antigonus, son of

Demetrius (B. C. 277-273), was expelled by Pyrrhus, whose

second reign lasted B. C. 273-271, but who was killed at Argos,

and Antigonus restored (B. C. 271-239). He captured Athens and

Corinth; the latter was retaken by the Achæan League. Demetrius

II. (B. C. 239-229) allied himself with Epirus against the

Achæan and Ætolian Leagues. First interference of Rome in

Grecian affairs, B. C. 238. Regency of Antigonus Doson, B. C.

229-220. Reform and renewed energy in Sparta. Macedonians,

in alliance with the Achæan League, defeated the Spartans at

Sellasia, B. C. 221. Independent reign of Philip V., B. C.

220-179. His wars against Ætolia, Rome, Egypt. Romans, in a

second war, proclaimed liberty to the Greeks; overthrew Philip

at Cynocephalæ, B. C. 197; subdivided and reorganized the

Grecian states. The Ætolians provoked another war, their ally,

Antiochus, was defeated at Thermopylæ and Magnesia. Death of

Prince Demetrius and his father. Efforts of Perseus, the last

king of Macedon (B. C. 179-168). His war with Rome; defeat at

Pydna; capture and death. Division of Macedonia. Reduction of

tribute. Treachery of the Romans toward the Achæan League. Last

war with Rome. Battle of Leucopetra, near Corinth, B. C. 146.

IV. THRACE.

=87.= The Thracian kingdom of Lysimachus has no history that need detain

us. Unlike Egypt or Syria under Macedonian rule, it contributed nothing

to literature, science, or general civilization. The several tribes were

powerful by reason of their numbers, their hardy contempt of danger and

exposure, and their untamable love of freedom; but their strength was too

often wasted in fighting against each other, and thus they were reduced

either to subjects or humble allies of the more civilized nations to the

southward. At the same time, their position on the Danube rendered them

the most exposed of all the ancient kingdoms, to the incursions of the

northern barbarians; and the history of Thrace under the Romans is only a

record of wars and devastations.

V. KINGDOM OF PERGAMUS.

=88.= Beside the four great monarchies already described, a number of

smaller kingdoms arose from the ruins of Alexander’s empire. A few of

these will be briefly mentioned. Pergamus, on the Ca´icus in Mysia,

possessed a strong fortress, which was used by Lysimachus as a place

of safe keeping for his treasures, under the charge of Philetæ´rus,

of Tium, an officer in whom he reposed the greatest confidence. This

person, provoked by ill-treatment from the Thracian queen, made himself

independent, and by means of the ample treasures of Lysimachus,

maintained his principality undisturbed for twenty years, B. C. 283-263.

(See §§ 30, 31.)

His nephew, Eumenes, who succeeded him, increased his territories by

a victory over Antiochus I., near Sardis. After reigning twenty-two

years (B. C., 263-241), he was succeeded by his cousin, Attalus I., who

gained a great victory over the Gauls, and, first of his family, took

the title of king. Ten years later, he defeated Antiochus Hierax (see

§ 33), and included in his own dominions all the countries west of the

Halys and north of the Taurus. In wars with the kings of Syria, he lost

these conquests, and was limited for seven years to his own principality

of Pergamus; but by the aid of Gallic mercenaries and his own good

management, he won back most of the territories. He earned the favor of

Rome by joining that Republic against Philip V. of Macedon. The country

was ravaged by Philip in the interval of his Roman wars (see § 80); but

the great victory off Chios compensated Attalus for his losses, and the

treasures he amassed made his name proverbial for wealth. His exertions

in behalf of his allies, during the second war of Rome and Macedon, ended

his life at an advanced age, B. C. 197.

=89.= Eumenes II., his eldest son and successor, aided the Roman

operations against the kings of Syria and Macedonia, with so much

energy and talent, that he was rewarded with an increase of territory

on both sides of the Hellespont, and his kingdom was for a time one

of the greatest in Asia. He continued his father’s liberal policy in

the encouragement of art and literature, founded the great Library of

Pergamus, which was second only to that of Alexandria, and beautified

his capital with many magnificent buildings. At his death his crown was

assumed by his brother, Attalus II. (Philadelphus), as the son of Eumenes

was still a child. More than half the twenty-one years of Philadelphus’s

reign were occupied by wars, especially against Pru´sias II., king of

Bithynia. By aiding the revolt of Nicomedes, who gained that kingdom

instead of his father, Attalus secured some years of peace, which he

employed in building cities and increasing his library. Chief of the

cities were Eumeni´a, in Phrygia; Philadelphia, in Lydia; and Attali´a,

in Pamphylia.

=90.= Philadelphus died B. C. 138, leaving the kingdom to his nephew,

Attalus III. (Philometor), the son of Eumenes II. This king crowded into

the short period of five years more crimes and atrocities than can be

found in all the other reigns of his dynasty put together. He murdered

all the old friends of his father and uncle, with their families; all

who still held any office of trust in the kingdom; and, finally, his own

nearest relatives, including his mother, for whom he had professed the

warmest affection by the surname he adopted. At last he retired from

this atrocious career of misgovernment, to the more innocent pursuits

of painting, sculpture, and gardening. He died of a fever, leaving his

kingdom a legacy to the Roman people. Aristoni´cus, a half-brother of

Attalus III., successfully resisted the Roman claims for three years,

even defeating and capturing Licin´ius Crassus, who was sent to take

possession; but he was in turn made prisoner, and Pergamus was added to

the territories of Rome, B. C. 130.

VI. BITHYNIA.

=91.= This tributary province of Persia regained its independence

upon the overthrow of that empire, and resisted all the efforts of

Alexander’s generals to reduce it. Among its kings were Nicomedes I.,

who founded Nicomedia on the Propontis; Zeilas, who gained his crown by

the aid of the Gauls; and Prusias, his son, who extended his kingdom

by constant wars, and would have raised it to great importance but for

the offense he gave the Romans, by making war against Pergamus and by

sheltering Hannibal. He was forced to surrender to Eumenes some important

territories.

Prusias II. suffered still greater disasters, owing to his own

contemptible wickedness. He sent his son Nicomedes to Rome, with secret

orders for his assassination. But the plot failed; and Nicomedes II.,

whose popularity had excited his father’s jealousy, now returned with

the support of the Romans and the Pergamene king, and gained possession

of the throne. He reigned fifty-eight years with the title Epiphanes

(Illustrious). His son, Nicomedes III., in alliance with the Romans, made

war seven years with Mithridates, king of Pontus, their most able and

resolute opponent. He was twice expelled from his dominions; but after

the close of the first Mithridatic War, he reigned peacefully ten years,

and, having no children, left his kingdom to the Romans, B. C. 74.

VII. PONTUS.

=92.= Cappadocia under the Persians had been a satrapy, governed by

the descendants of that Ota´nes who conspired with Darius I. against

the false Smerdis. (See Book II.) In 363 B. C., a son of the satrap

Mithridates revolted, and made himself king of that portion of Cappadocia

which lay next the sea, and was thence called Pontus by the Greeks.

This kingdom was for a short time subject to the Macedonian power; but

Mithridates I., in 318 B. C., became again independent. The annals of

the next two reigns are of no great importance. Mithridates III. (B. C.

245-190) enlarged and strengthened his dominion by alliances with the

Asiatic monarchs, as well as by wars. His son Phar´naces conquered Sinope

from the Greeks, and made it his capital. The next king, Mithridates

IV. (B. C. 160-120), aided Rome against Carthage and Pergamus, and was

rewarded by the addition of the Greater Phrygia to his dominions.

=93.= Mithridates V., the Great, came to the throne at the age of eleven

years, his father having been murdered by some officers of the court.

The young prince, distrusting his guardians, began in his earliest years

to accustom himself to antidotes against poison, and to spend much of

his time in hunting, which enabled him to take refuge in the most rough

and inaccessible portions of his kingdom. He had, however, received a

Greek education at Sinope; and when, at the age of twenty, he assumed the

government, he possessed not only a soul and body inured to every sort of

peril and hardship, but a mind furnished with all the knowledge needful

to a king. He spoke twenty-five languages, and could transact business

with every tribe of his dominions, in its own peculiar dialect.

The Romans had already seized his province of Phrygia, and he clearly

saw the conflict which must soon take place with the all-absorbing

Republic. He determined, therefore, to extend his kingdom to the eastward

and northward, thus increasing its power and wealth, so as to make it

more nearly a match for its great western antagonist. In seven years

he added to his dominions half the shores of the Black Sea, including

the Cimme´rian peninsula—now the Crimea—and extending westward to the

Dniester. He made alliances with the wild and powerful tribes upon the

Danube, and with the kings of Armenia, Cappadocia, and Bithynia. From

the last two countries he afterward drove out their hereditary kings,

placing his own son on the throne of Cappadocia, and Socrates, a younger

brother of Nicomedes III., on that of Bithynia.

=94.= The Roman Senate now interfered, and with their favor Nicomedes

invaded Pontus. Mithridates marched into Cappadocia and drove out its

newly reinstated king; then into Bithynia, where he routed the army of

Nicomedes and defeated the Romans. He speedily made himself master of all

Asia Minor, except a few towns in the extreme south and west; and from

his headquarters at Pergamus, gave orders for a general massacre of all

Romans and Italians in Asia. Eighty thousand persons fell in consequence

of this atrocious act, but from that moment the tide turned against

Mithridates. Two large armies which he sent into Greece, were defeated

by Sulla at Chæronea. A great battle in Bithynia was lost by the Pontic

generals. Pontus itself was invaded, and its king became a fugitive.

Peace was at length made, on terms most humiliating to Mithridates. He

surrendered all his conquests, and a fleet of seventy vessels; agreed to

pay 2,000 talents; and recognized the kings of Cappadocia and Bithynia,

whom he had formerly expelled. The reverses of Mithridates naturally led

the subject nations on the Euxine to throw off his yoke. He was preparing

to march against them, when a second Roman war was kindled by a sudden

and unprovoked aggression of Murena, the general of the Republic in the

East. The Romans were defeated on the Halys, and peace was restored, B.

C. 82.

=95.= In the seven years’ breathing-space which followed, Mithridates

subdued all his revolted subjects, and recruited his forces with the

utmost energy. His army, drawn largely from the barbarous nations on

the Danube and Euxine, was drilled and equipped according to the Roman

system, and his navy was increased to four hundred vessels. Both the

Pontic king and the Romans would willingly have remained some years

longer at peace, but, in 74 B. C., the legacy of Bithynia to the latter

power, by Nicomedes III., brought them into unavoidable collision.

Mithridates first seized the country, and gained a double victory over

Cotta, by sea and land. But he failed in the sieges of Chalcedon and

Cyzicus, and in the second year he was repeatedly worsted by Lucul´lus.

His fleet was first defeated off Tenedos, and then wrecked by a storm. In

the third year Mithridates was driven out of his own dominions, and those

of his son-in-law, Tigranes. For three years the war was carried on in

Armenia, where the two kings were twice defeated by Lucullus.

In 68 B. C., Mithridates returned to his kingdom, and defeated the Romans

twice within a few months. But in 66 B. C., Pompey assumed the command,

and Mithridates, after the loss of nearly his whole army, abandoned

Pontus, and retired into the barbarous regions north of the Euxine, where

the Romans did not care to pursue him. With a spirit untamed either by

years or misfortunes, he plotted the bold design of gathering to his

standard the wild tribes along the Danube, and marching upon Italy from

the north. But his officers did not share his enthusiasm. A conspiracy

against him was headed by his own son; and the old king, deserted by all

whom he would have trusted, attempted to end his life by poison. His

constitution had been for many years so guarded by antidotes, that the

drugs had no effect, and he was finally dispatched by one of his Gallic

soldiers. Pontus became a Roman province, only a small portion of its

territory continuing, a century or more, under princes of the ancient

dynasty.

VIII. CAPPADOCIA.

[Illustration: Coin of Ariarathes V., twice the size of original.]

=96.= The southern part of Cappadocia remained loyal to the Persian

kings until their downfall at Arbela. It was conquered by Perdiccas

after the death of Alexander, but within six years became independent,

and continued under native kings until it was absorbed into the Roman

dominions, A. D. 17. The history of these monarchs is of little

importance, except so far as it is included in that of the neighboring

nations. The fifth king, Ariara´thes IV., made, in his later years, a

close and friendly alliance with the Romans, which continued unbroken

under his successors.

Ariarathes V. (B. C. 131-96) presents the sole example of a “blameless

prince” in the three centuries following Alexander. No act of deceit or

cruelty is recorded against him. Cappadocia, under his reign, became a

celebrated abode of philosophy, under the patronage and example of the

king. With Ariarathes VIII., the royal Persian line became extinct, and

the Cappadocians chose a new sovereign in Ariobarza´nes I. (B. C. 93-64).

This king was three times driven out of his dominions by the sovereigns

of Armenia and Pontus, and three times reinstated by the Romans. The last

king, Archelaus (B. C. 36-A. D. 17), was summoned by Tibe´rius to Rome,

where he died, and his kingdom became a Roman province.

IX. ARMENIA.

=97.= Armenia was included in the kingdom of the Seleucidæ, from

the battle of Ipsus to that of Magnesia, B. C. 190. Two generals of

Antiochus III. then revolted against him, and set up the kingdoms

of Armenia Major on the east, and Armenia Minor on the west of the

Euphrates. The greatest king of Armenia Major was Tigranes I. (B. C.

96-55), who not only gained important victories from the Parthian

monarch, but conquered all Syria, and held it fourteen years. He incurred

the vengeance of Rome in various ways, but chiefly by sustaining his

father-in-law, Mithridates, in his wars against the Republic. He suffered

several calamitous defeats, with the loss of his capital, Tigran´ocer´ta.

In 67 B. C., the disaffection of the Roman troops gave the two kings the

opportunity to recover much of what they had lost. The appearance of the

great Pompey upon the scene again turned the tide. The young Tigranes

rebelled against his father, with the aid of Parthia and Rome. The king

surrendered all his conquests, retaining only his hereditary kingdom

of the Greater Armenia. His son, Artavas´des I. (B. C. 55-34), aided

the expedition of Crassus against the Parthians; but having afterward

offended Antony, he was taken prisoner and put to death by order of

Cleopatra. Artaxias, his son, ordered a massacre of all the Romans in

Armenia. In 19 B. C., he was himself murdered by his own relations. The

remaining kings were sovereigns only in name, being set up or displaced

alternately by the Romans and Parthians, until Armenia was absorbed by

the former, A. D. 114. Armenia Minor was usually a dependency of some

neighboring kingdom, from the time of Mithridates to that of Vespa´sian

(A. D. 69-79), when it, too, became a Roman province.

X. BACTRIA.

=98.= Bactria was a part of the Syrian empire from 305 to 255 B. C.

Diodotus, the satrap, then made himself independent, and established

a new Greek kingdom, the most easterly of all the scattered fragments

of Alexander’s conquests. Euthydemus, the third king, was a native of

Magnesia, and a usurper (B. C. 222-200). His son Demetrius made many

victorious campaigns, extending over Afghanistan and into India (B. C.

200-180). He lost a part of his native dominions to a rebel, Eucrat´ides,

who reigned north of the Pa´ropam´isus range during the life of

Demetrius, and after his death, over the whole country. He, too, carried

on Indian wars with great energy and success. Under his son, Heli´ocles

(B. C. 160-150), the Bactrian kingdom rapidly declined, being invaded by

the Parthian kings on the west, and the Tartar tribes from the north.

XI. PARTHIAN EMPIRE OF THE ARSACIDÆ.

=99.= The Parthians established their independence about B. C. 250, under

the lead of the Scythian Arsaces. The people were of the same race with

the modern Turks—treacherous in war, indolent and unaspiring in peace,

rude in arts and barbarous in manners. Their warlike hardihood, however,

gave the Romans a more troublesome resistance than they encountered in

any other portion of Alexander’s former empire; and the dominion of the

Arsacidæ lasted nearly 500 years, until it was overthrown by the new

Persian kingdom, A. D. 226. The greatness of the Parthian empire dates

from Mithridates, who is also called Arsaces VI., B. C. 174-136. The

neighboring kingdom of Bactria, with its Greek monarchs and its higher

civilization, had hitherto maintained the ascendency; but while these

kings were absorbed in their Indian conquests, Mithridates seized upon

several of their provinces, and eventually absorbed their whole dominion.

[Illustration: Coin of Arsaces III., twice the size of original.]

The Parthian empire, at its greatest extent, comprised all the countries

between the Euphrates and the Indus; from the Araxes and the Caspian

on the north, to the Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean on the south. Its

numerous parts were not consolidated into one government, as were the

satrapies of Persia or the provinces of Rome; but each nation, with its

own laws and usages, retained its native king, who was tributary to the

lord-paramount in the Arsacid family. Hence the Parthian coins, like the

Assyrian monuments, commonly bear the title “King of Kings.” The wars of

Mithridates made the Euphrates the boundary-line between the Parthian and

Roman empires. The wealth and power of the Oriental monarchy provoked

at once the avarice and the jealousy of the western Republic, and a

collision could not long be delayed. The details of the Parthian wars of

Rome will be found in Book V.

RECAPITULATION.

Bravery and barbarism of the Thracians. Rise of Pergamus, B.

C. 283. Reigns of Philotærus, Eumenes, Attalus I. Success and

enlightened policy of Eumenes II. Wars of Attalus Philadelphus.

His new cities. Crimes of Attalus III. Bequest of his kingdom

to Rome. Short reign of Aristonicus. Bithynia ruled by

Nicomedes I., Zeilas, Prusias I. and II., Nicomedes II. and

III., B. C. 278-74. Rise of the kingdom of Pontus, B. C. 363.

Independent of Macedon, B. C. 318; enlarged by Mithridates

III. and Pharnaces, B. C. 245-160. Education of Mithridates

V., his conquests and alliances; first collision with the

Romans, B. C. 88; massacre of 80,000 Italians; disasters and

humiliating peace. Second Roman War, B. C. 83, 82. Seven

years’ drill of Pontic forces in Roman tactics. Third Roman

War, B. C. 74-65; Mithridates driven into Armenia, B. C. 71;

recovered his kingdom, B. C. 68; defeated by Pompey, B. C.

66; took refuge in the northern wilds, and ended his life by

violence, B. C. 63. Pontus became a Roman province. Cappadocia

in alliance with Rome, B. C. 188. Just and peaceful reign of

Ariarathes V. End of the dynasty in Ariarathes VIII. Exiles

and returns of Ariobarzanes I. The country absorbed into the

Roman dominion, A. D. 17. Armenia a part of the Syrian empire,

B. C. 301-190. “Greater” and “Lesser” kingdoms then formed

on the east and west of the Euphrates. Conquest of Syria

by Tigranes I., B. C. 83. His wars with Rome, B. C. 69-66.

Losses. Fate of Artavasdes. Massacre of the Romans by Artaxias.

Alternate dependence upon Rome and Parthia, B. C. 19-A. D.

114. Bactria dependent upon Syria, B. C. 305-255. Diodotus

reigned, B. C. 255-237. The third king a Lydian, B. C. 222-200.

Indian campaigns of Demetrius and Eucratidas, B. C. 200-160.

Decline and fall of the kingdom under attacks of surrounding

barbarians, B. C. 160-80. Parthian empire powerful, but

uncivilized. Absorption of Bactrian provinces, B. C. 174-136. A

group of kingdoms, rather than a nation, side by side with Rome.

XII. JUDÆA.

=100.= Judæa, with the rest of Syria, had been assigned to Laom´edon

upon the partition of Alexander’s conquests; but it was soon annexed by

Ptolemy Soter, and continued 117 years a part of the Egyptian empire. Its

history in this Book will be considered in three periods:

I. From the Fall of the Persian Empire to the Rise of an

Independent Jewish Kingdom, B. C. 323-168.

II. The Time of the Maccabees, B. C. 168-37.

III. The Time of the Herods, B. C. 37-A. D. 44.

FIRST PERIOD. Under the first three Ptolemies, the Jews were peaceful and

prosperous. The high priest was at the head of the state, and in local

matters ruled with little interference from Egypt. Ptolemy Philopator,

however, a wicked and foolish prince, attempted to profane the temple,

and the Jews, in alarm, sought protection from Antiochus the Great. That

monarch, with their aid, gained possession of all the coast between

Upper Syria and the Desert of Sinai; and though often disputed, and once

recovered by the Egyptians, this district remained a part of the Syrian

kingdom.

=101.= For thirty years the privileges of the Jews were respected by

their new sovereigns; but toward the close of his reign, Seleucus IV.

resolved to appropriate the sacred treasures of the temple to his own

pressing needs, and sent Heliodorus, his treasurer, for this purpose to

Jerusalem. According to the Jewish tradition,[61] three angels appeared

for the defense of the holy place. One of them was seated on a terrible

horse, which trampled Heliodorus under its feet, while the others

scourged him until he fell lifeless to the ground. He was only restored

by the prayers of the high priest, and the treasury remained unmolested.

Antiochus Epiphanes, the brother and successor of Seleucus, was guilty

of still more impious outrages. He put up the high priesthood at

auction, and twice awarded it to the highest bidder, on condition of

his introducing Greek rites and customs into Jerusalem. One of these

mercenary pontiffs stole the sacred vessels of the temple and sold

them at Tyre. An insurrection arose at Jerusalem, but it was punished

by Antiochus in person, who seized the city, set up an altar to Zeus

Olympius, with daily sacrifices of swine’s flesh in the sacred inclosure

of the temple, and put to death a great number of the people. Two years

later, B. C. 168, he ordered a general massacre of the Jews, and by a

frightful persecution sought to exterminate the last remnant of the

ancient religion. The Asmonæ´an family now arose, and by their brave

fidelity made themselves at last sovereigns of Judæa.

=102.= SECOND PERIOD. Mattathias, a priest, living between Jerusalem

and Joppa, killed with his own hand the king’s officer who was sent to

enforce the heathen sacrifices, together with the first renegade Jew

who consented to offer. He then took refuge in the mountains with his

five sons, and was reinforced daily by fugitives from various parts of

Judæa. As their numbers increased, this band issued frequently from their

fastnesses, cut off detachments of the Syrian army, destroyed heathen

altars, and in many places restored the Jewish worship in the synagogues.

The aged Mattathias died in the first year of the war, and was succeeded

in command of the forces by his third son, Judas, who obtained the name

of _Maccabæus_ from his many victories.

During the disputes for the Syrian regency, which followed the death of

Antiochus Epiphanes (see §§ 40, 41), Judas Maccabæus gained possession of

all Jerusalem, except the citadel on Mount Zion, and held it three years.

He purified the temple, restored the incense, lights, and sacrifices,

and drove out Syrians and Hellenizing Jews from every part of Judæa.

The Syrian general, Nicanor, was twice defeated with great loss. In the

second battle, near Beth-horon, Nicanor fell, and his whole army was

cut to pieces. The Romans made alliance with the Maccabees; but before

their aid could arrive, Judas had fallen in battle, B. C. 160. Jerusalem

was lost, and for fourteen years Jonathan Maccabæus could only carry

on a guerrilla warfare from his fastness in the Desert of Teko´ah. The

disputes for the Syrian throne, between Demetrius and Alexander Balas,

which were continued under their sons (see §§ 42-46), gave a respite

to the Jews, and even made their alliance an object of desire to both

parties. Jonathan was thenceforth recognized as prince and high priest,

with full possession of the Holy City.

=103.= His brother Simon succeeded him in both dignities, and under his

prosperous administration Judæa recovered, in great measure, from the

long-continued ravages of war. The life of Simon was ended by treachery.

His son-in-law, Ptolemy, the governor of Jericho, desiring to seize the

government for himself, murdered the high priest and two of his sons

at a banquet. But the other son, John Hyrcanus, escaped and succeeded

his father. At the beginning of his reign, Jerusalem endured a long and

painful siege by Antiochus Sidetes, B. C. 135-133. Its walls, which had

been restored, were leveled with the ground; and a tribute was again

demanded, which lasted, however, no longer than the life of Sidetes.

Hyrcanus captured Samaria, and destroyed the temple on Mount Gerizim (see

Book II, § 64). He conquered Id´ume´a, rendering Judæa fully equal in

power to Syria, which was now reduced from a great empire to a petty and

exhausted kingdom.

=104.= Aristobu´lus, son of Hyrcanus, was the first of the family who

assumed the title of king. He reigned but a year, and was succeeded

by his brother, Alexander Jannæ´us (B. C. 105-78). This prince was a

Sadducee, and the opposite sect of the Pharisees stirred up a mob to

attack him, while officiating as high priest in the Feast of Tabernacles.

The riot was put down with a slaughter of 6,000 insurgents. Alexander

gained victories over the Moabites and the Arabs of Gilead; but in a

subsequent war with the latter he suffered a great defeat, and the

malcontents at home seized the occasion for a new outbreak. The civil war

now raged six years. For a time Alexander was driven to the mountains,

but at length he regained the ascendency, and revenged himself upon the

rebels with frightful cruelty. He left the crown to his widow, Alexandra,

who joined the Pharisees, and was maintained in power by their influence.

=105.= After her death, her two sons, Hyrcanus and Aristobulus, quarreled

seven years for the sovereignty. Pompey the Great, who was then at

Damascus, interfered and captured Jerusalem, carried off Aristobulus to

Rome, and established the elder brother in the government. He reigned six

years in peace, B. C. 63-57. In the latter year Aristobulus escaped, and

being joined by many of his partisans, renewed the war. He was besieged

and taken in Machæ´rus by the Roman proconsul, who also deposed Hyrcanus,

and set up a sort of oligarchy in Jerusalem. Pompey, in taking the city,

had left its sacred treasures untouched, but during this period, Crassus,

on his way to Parthia, seized and plundered the temple. After ten years

(B. C. 57-47), Hyrcanus was restored to the high priesthood, while

his friend Antipater, the Idumæan, was appointed procurator, or civil

governor, of Judæa.

In B. C. 40, Antigonus, son of Aristobulus, with the aid of a Parthian

force, captured Jerusalem and reigned three years, the last of the

Asmonæan princes. Antipater had been poisoned; his son Herod repaired to

Rome, and received from the Senate the title of King of Judæa. Returning

speedily, he conquered Galilee and advanced to the siege of Jerusalem.

This was protracted several years, for the Jews were firmly attached to

Antigonus, and resented equally the interference of Rome and the reign of

an Edomite. After hard fighting the walls were taken, and the king was

executed like a common criminal.

=106.= THIRD PERIOD, B. C. 37-A. D. 44. Herod was justly surnamed “the

Great,” for his talents and the grandeur of his enterprises, though

his character was stained by the worst faults of a tyrant, cruelty and

reckless caprice. At the age of fifteen he had been made governor of

Galilee by Julius Cæsar, and had ruled with great energy and success,

suppressing the banditti who infested the country, and putting their

leaders to death. He began his reign in Judæa by a massacre of all who

had been opposed to him, especially those whose wealth would best enable

him to reward his Roman benefactors. The Temple, which, being used as a

fortress, had been nearly destroyed in the repeated sieges, was rebuilt,

by his orders, with a magnificence which rivaled the glories of Solomon.

His liberality was equally shown during a famine which visited Judæa and

the surrounding countries. He bought immense quantities of corn in Egypt,

and fed the entire people at his own expense, beside supplying several

provinces with seed for the next harvest.

Herod affected Roman tastes: he built a circus and amphitheater in

a suburb of Jerusalem, where games and combats of wild beasts were

celebrated in honor of the emperor Augustus. To show his impartiality,

he restored the Samaritan temple on Mount Gerizim, while he adorned his

new and magnificent city of Cæsare´a with imposing shrines of the Roman

gods. This universal tolerance was most unpleasing to the Jews, and their

disposition to revolt was only kept down by the vigilance of innumerable

spies, and the construction of a chain of fortresses around Jerusalem.

=107.= The last two members of the Asmonæan family were Mariam´ne and

Aristobulus, grandchildren of Hyrcanus II. Herod married the former,

and bestowed upon the latter the office of high priest; but the great

popularity of the young prince alarmed his jealousy, and he caused him

to be secretly assassinated. Though devotedly attached to Mariamne,

Herod twice ordered her put to death in case of his own decease,

during perilous expeditions for which he was leaving the capital.

These atrocious orders coming to the knowledge of the queen, naturally

increased the aversion for Herod which had been inspired by the murder of

her grandfather and her brother.

Her high spirit scorned concealment; she was brought to trial, and her

bitter enemies persuaded Herod to consent to her execution. But the

violence of his grief and remorse kept him a long time on the verge of

insanity, and a raging fever nearly ended his life. His temper, which had

been generous though hasty, now became so ferocious that his best friends

were often ordered to death on the slightest suspicion. Three of his sons

were executed on charges of conspiracy. From his death-bed he ordered a

massacre of the infants in Bethlehem, because wise men from the East had

informed him that in that little village the Messiah was born. About the

same time, he had set up a golden eagle over the gate of the Temple. A

sedition immediately arose, and its leaders were punished with atrocious

cruelty, by the command of the dying king. Herod died in the same year

with the birth of our Lord, which the common chronology places, by an

error, B. C. 4.

[Illustration: TEMPLE AT JERUSALEM, AS REBUILT BY HEROD.

_Herod’s Porch._ _Solomon’s Porch._ _Castle of Antonia._]

=108.= His dominions, except Abilene in Syria, were divided among

his three sons, Archelaus, Antipas, and Philip, the eldest receiving

Judæa and Samaria. He reigned so oppressively that he was removed by

the Romans, A. D. 8; and until A. D. 36, the province was managed by

procurators, or governors, subject to the præfects of Syria. Under the

fifth of these, Pontius Pilate, Christ was crucified by Roman authority,

through the accusations of the chief officers of the Jews. Herod Antipas

was meanwhile ruling in Galilee (B. C. 4-A. D. 39; see Luke xxiii: 6-12),

and Philip in Trachoni´tis (B. C. 4-A. D. 37; see Mark vi: 17, 18).

When these provinces became vacant, they were bestowed by the Emperor

Calig´ula upon his favorite, Herod Agrip´pa I., grandson of Herod the

Great and Mariamne. A. D. 41, Samaria and Judæa were also added to his

dominions, which for three years covered the entire territory of Herod

the Great.

=109.= Agrippa began to persecute the Christians in the year 44, and the

Romans again placed Judæa under the government of procurators. Gessius

Florus, the sixth of the new series, was a cruel and crafty tyrant, who

plundered his province without pity or shame. He shared the spoils of

highway robbers, whom he permitted and even encouraged. Twice he stirred

up riots in Jerusalem, sacrificing the lives of thousands of people, only

that he might avail himself of the confusion to pillage the Temple.

His atrocities at length drove the Jews to open revolt. A Roman army

of 100,000 men, commanded by Titus, the son of the emperor Vespasian,

besieged the Holy City five months. The three walls, the fortress of

Mount Zion, and the Temple had each to be taken by separate assault; and

never was a siege more memorable for the obstinacy of the resistance. The

Temple was surrendered Sept. 8, 70. All the people who had not perished

by the hardships of the siege, were made slaves and divided among the

victors as prizes. Large colonies were transported into the heart of

Germany or to Italy, where the golden vessels of the Temple adorned the

triumphal procession of Titus at Rome. No ancient city of any fame was

ever so completely ruined as Jerusalem. Mount Zion was plowed as a field

and sown with salt, and the buildings of the Temple were leveled to the

ground.

RECAPITULATION.

Judæa subject to Egypt, B. C. 320-203; to Syria, B. C. 203-168.

Persecution by Antiochus Epiphanes, and revolt of Mattathias,

B. C. 168. Victories of Judas Maccabæus, B. C. 166-160.

Jonathan prince and high priest, B. C. 160-143. Prosperous

reign of Simon, B. C. 143-133. Siege and capture of Jerusalem

by Antiochus Sidetes, B. C. 135-133. Conquests of John

Hyrcanus, B. C. 135-106. Aristobulus I. takes the royal title.

Civil wars of Pharisees and Sadducees, under Alexander Jannæus,

B. C. 105-78. Reign of Alexandra, B. C. 78-69. Hyrcanus II.,

B. C. 69, 68. Aristobulus II., B. C. 68-63. Jerusalem taken

by Pompey, who awards the sovereignty to Hyrcanus. After

six years, Hyrcanus deposed and an oligarchy set up, B. C.

57-47. Jerusalem plundered by Crassus, B. C. 54. Antipater,

the Idumæan, governor, B. C. 47-40, while Hyrcanus is again

high priest. Antigonus prince and priest, B. C. 40-37. Herod,

son of Antipater, invested at Rome with the royalty of Judæa,

conquers Galilee, and by a long siege takes Jerusalem, B. C.

37. His greatness and tyranny. His public works. Execution of

Queen Mariamne, B. C. 29. “Murder of the Innocents,” and death

of Herod, B. C. 4. Division of his kingdom into tetrarchies.

Archelaus succeeded in his government by Roman governors, A. D.

8-36. The Crucifixion, A. D. 29 or 30. Four provinces united

under Herod Agrippa, A. D. 41. Procurators restored, A. D. 44.

Gessius Florus, A. D. 65, 66. Siege and capture of Jerusalem by

Titus, A. D. 70.

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW.

BOOK IV.

1. Describe the rise of Macedonia. §§ 1, 2.

2. The successive steps of the ascendency of Philip. 2-5.

3. The youth, education, and character of Alexander. 6, 7.

4. His conquests and Asiatic policy. 8-12, 14-17.

5. His projects and death. 18.

6. The war of the regents. 19.

7. What was done by Antipater? 19, 20, 66, 67.

8. By Antigonus and his son? 20, 22-25, 29, 68.

9. What became of the near relatives of Alexander? 21-23.

10. What were the results of the battle of Ipsus? 25.

11. Effects upon Europe and Asia of Alexander’s conquests? 26, 27.

12. Describe the extent and organization of the kingdom of

Seleucus. 28-30.

13. Name the Seleucidæ, and relate one incident of each. 28-48.

14. Describe in detail the reign of Antiochus the Great. 34-37, 100.

15. The last but one of the kings of Syria. 48, 97.

16. The incursions of the Gauls. 31, 70, 71.

17. The condition of Egypt under the Ptolemies. 49, 51, 54.

18. Alexandria and its schools. 52, 53.

19. The conquests of the first three Ptolemies. 50, 54, 56.

20. The character of their successors. 56, 57, 60, 62-65.

21. What was the result to Athens of the Lamian War? 68.

22. What became of the sons of Cassander? 67.

23. How many kings of Thrace and Macedonia B. C. 281? 69, 70.

24. Describe the two reigns of Antigonus Gonatas. 72, 74.

25. The character of Pyrrhus. 72, 73.

26. Tell the history of the Achæan League. 75-79, 82, 86.

27. What occurred in Sparta during the Macedonian regency

of Antigonus Doson? 77.

28. Describe the character and reign of Philip V. 78-81, 83.

29. The successive interventions of the Romans in

affairs of Macedonia and Greece. 76, 79, 81-83, 85, 86.

30. The last of the Antigonidæ. 84.

31. How many kings of other families or nations reigned in

Macedonia during the Third Period?

32. Describe the Thracians. 87.

33. The origin and history of Pergamus. 88-90.

34. Of Bithynia. 91.

35. The early history of Pontus. 92.

36. Tell the story of Mithridates V. 93-95.

37. Describe Cappadocia. 96.

38. Tell in brief the history of Armenia, B. C. 301-A. D. 114. 97.

39. Describe the most easterly of the Greek kingdoms in Asia. 98.

40. The character and history of the Parthians. 99.

41. How was Judæa governed, B. C. 323-168? 100, 101.

42. Describe its condition under the Syrian kings. 101.

43. The rise and reign of the Maccabees. 102-105.

44. The character of Herod, and the great events of

his reign. 106, 107.

45. How were his dominions distributed B. C. 4-A. D. 44? 108.

46. Describe the last twenty-six years of Jewish history. 109.

47. How many battles have been described at Beth-horon?

48. How many at Thermopylæ?

49. How many at Mantinea?

50. How many at Salamis in Cyprus?

51. How many at Chæronea?

BOOK V.

HISTORY OF ROME, FROM THE EARLIEST TIMES TO THE FALL OF THE WESTERN

EMPIRE, A. D. 476.

GEOGRAPHICAL SKETCH OF ITALY.

=1.= ITALY, bounded by the Alps, and the Adriatic, Ionian, and

Tyrrhe´nian seas, is the smallest of the three peninsulas of southern

Europe. It is inferior to Greece in the number of its harbors and

littoral islands, but excels it in the richness and extent of its plains

and fertile mountain-sides, being thus better fitted for agriculture and

the rearing of cattle than for maritime interests. Still, from its long

and narrow shape, Italy has an extended coast-line; the slopes of the

Apennines abounded, in ancient times, with forests of oak suitable for

ship-timber; and the people, especially of Etru´ria, were early attracted

to the sea.

=2.= The Alps, which separate Italy from the rest of Europe, have had an

important effect upon her history. At present they are traversed securely

by less than a dozen roads, which are among the wonders of modern

engineering. In early times they formed a usually effectual barrier

against the barbarous nations on the north and west. The Apennines leave

the Alpine range near the present boundary between Italy and France, and

extend in a south-easterly and southerly direction to the end of the

peninsula, throwing off lateral ridges on both sides to the sea, and

forming that great variety of surface and climate which is the peculiar

charm of the country. A multitude of rivers contribute vastly to the

fertility of the soil, though, from their short and rapid course, they

are of little value for navigation. Varro preferred the climate of Italy

to that of Greece, as producing in perfection every thing good for the

use of man. No barley could be compared with the Campa´nian, no wheat

with the Apu´lian, no rye with the Faler´nian, no oil with the Vena´fran.

=3.= NORTHERN ITALY lies between the Swiss Alps and the Upper Apennines,

and is almost covered by the great plain of the Po, which is one of the

most fertile regions of Europe. It comprised, in the most ancient times,

the three countries of Ligu´ria, Upper Etruria, and Vene´tia. The second

of these divisions, together with some portions of the Ligurian and

Venetian territories, was conquered, in the sixth century before Christ,

by a Celtic population from the north and west, and was thenceforth known

as Cisalpine Gaul. The region north of the Apennines does not belong to

Roman or even Italian history until about the time of the Christian Era,

when it became incorporated in the territories of Rome.

=4.= The peninsula proper is divided into the two regions of central and

southern Italy, by a line drawn from the mouth of the Tifer´nus, on the

Adriatic, to that of the Sil´arus, on the western coast. CENTRAL ITALY

comprised six countries, of which three, Etruria, La´tium, and Campania,

were on the Tyrrhenian Sea, and three others, Um´bria, Pice´num, and the

Sabine country, on the Adriatic. _Etruria_ was, in the earliest times,

the most important division of Italy proper. It was separated from

Liguria by the river Macra; from Cisalpine Gaul, by the Apennines; and

from Umbria, the Sabine territory, and Latium, by the Tiber.

A Manual of Ancient History · 第 8 / 12 章