AT THE PLAY.

"MARY ROSE."

OF course nobody could possibly suspect Sir JAMES BARRIE of plagiarising

(save from himself), yet it will explain something of the atmosphere of

_Mary Rose_ if I say that it is a story with such a theme as that

admirable ghostmonger, the Provost of Eton, would whole-heartedly

approve--thrilling, sinister, inconclusive--with (shall I say?) just a

dash of Sir ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE in his other-worldly mood to bring it

well into the movement. Naturally the variations are sheer BARRIE and of

the most adroit.

[Illustration: THE BOY WHO WOULD GROW UP FASTER THAN HIS

MOTHER.

_Mary Rose_ . . . MISS FAY COMPTON.

_Harry_ . . . . MR. ROBERT LORAINE.]

_Mary Rose_ is in fact a girl who couldn't grow up, because whenever she

visited a little mystery island in the Outer Hebrides "they" who lived

in a "lovely, lovely, lovely" vague world beyond these voices would call

her vaguely (to Mr. NORMAN O'NEILL'S charming music), and she would as

vaguely return with no memory of what had passed and no change in her

physical condition. This didn't matter so much when, as a mere child,

she disappeared for thirty days; but when, mother of an incomparable

heir of two, she was rapt away in the middle of a picnic for twenty-five

years, and returned to find a husband, mother and father inexplicably

old and changed, and dreadfully silent about her babe--well, you see for

yourself how hopeless everything was. As if there were not enough real

tragedy in the world and it were necessary to invent!

I don't think it fair to tell you any more. You shouldn't suffer these

thrills at second-hand. But I can say that, in spite of making it a

point of professional honour to try to keep a warm spine and check the

unbidden tear from trickling down my nose (which makes you look such an

ass before a cynical colleague during the intervals), I was beaten in

both attempts. The "effects" were astonishingly well contrived by both

author and producer (Mr. HOLMAN CLARK). You were not let down at the

supreme moment by a hurried shuffle of dimly seen forms or the click of

an electrician's gear suggesting too solid flesh. The house was in a

queer way stunned by the poignancy of the last scene between the young

ghost-mother and the long-sought unrecognised son, and had to shake

itself before it could reward with due applause the fine playing of as

perfect a cast as I have seen for a long time. There's no manner of

doubt that Sir JAMES "got it over" (as they say) all right.

Miss FAY COMPTON makes astonishing strides. Her _Mary Rose_ had adorable

shy movements, caresses, intonations, wistfulnesses. These were traits

of _Mary Rose_, not tricks of Miss COMPTON. And they escaped

monotony--supreme achievement in the difficult circumstances. Mr. ROBERT

LORAINE in the doubled _roles_ of _Mary Rose's_ husband and son, showed

a very fine skill in his differentiation of the husband's character in

three phases of time and development, and of the son's, with its family

likeness and individual variation. Mr. ERNEST THESIGER, who seems to

touch nothing he does not adorn, gave a fine rendering of as charming a

character as ever came out of the BARRIE box--the superstitious,

learned, courteous crofter's son, student of Aberdeen University,

temporary boatman and (later) minister. He did his best incidentally, by

rowing away without casting off, to corroborate the local legend that

the queer little island sometimes disappeared. Miss MARY JERROLD was

just the perfect BARRIE mother (of _Mary Rose_). Mr. ARTHUR WHITBY'S

parson, Mr. NORMAN FORBES' squire, Miss JEAN CADELL'S housekeeper, left

no chinks in their armour for a critic's spleenful arrow.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Vol. 158, 1920-04-28 · 第 26 / 31 题