SECTION V.

_A DIGRESSION IN THE MODERN KIND_.

WE whom the world is pleased to honour with the title of modern authors,

should never have been able to compass our great design of an everlasting

remembrance and never-dying fame if our endeavours had not been so highly

serviceable to the general good of mankind. This, O universe! is the

adventurous attempt of me, thy secretary—

“Quemvis perferre laborem

Suadet, et inducit noctes vigilare serenas.”

To this end I have some time since, with a world of pains and art,

dissected the carcass of human nature, and read many useful lectures upon

the several parts, both containing and contained, till at last it smelt

so strong I could preserve it no longer. Upon which I have been at a

great expense to fit up all the bones with exact contexture and in due

symmetry, so that I am ready to show a very complete anatomy thereof to

all curious gentlemen and others. But not to digress further in the

midst of a digression, as I have known some authors enclose digressions

in one another like a nest of boxes, I do affirm that, having carefully

cut up human nature, I have found a very strange, new, and important

discovery: that the public good of mankind is performed by two

ways—instruction and diversion. And I have further proved my said

several readings (which, perhaps, the world may one day see, if I can

prevail on any friend to steal a copy, or on certain gentlemen of my

admirers to be very importunate) that, as mankind is now disposed, he

receives much greater advantage by being diverted than instructed, his

epidemical diseases being fastidiosity, amorphy, and oscitation; whereas,

in the present universal empire of wit and learning, there seems but

little matter left for instruction. However, in compliance with a lesson

of great age and authority, I have attempted carrying the point in all

its heights, and accordingly throughout this divine treatise have

skilfully kneaded up both together with a layer of _utile_ and a layer of

_dulce_.

When I consider how exceedingly our illustrious moderns have eclipsed the

weak glimmering lights of the ancients, and turned them out of the road

of all fashionable commerce to a degree that our choice town wits of most

refined accomplishments are in grave dispute whether there have been ever

any ancients or no; in which point we are like to receive wonderful

satisfaction from the most useful labours and lucubrations of that worthy

modern, Dr. Bentley. I say, when I consider all this, I cannot but

bewail that no famous modern hath ever yet attempted an universal system

in a small portable volume of all things that are to be known, or

believed, or imagined, or practised in life. I am, however, forced to

acknowledge that such an enterprise was thought on some time ago by a

great philosopher of O-Brazile. The method he proposed was by a certain

curious receipt, a nostrum, which after his untimely death I found among

his papers, and do here, out of my great affection to the modern learned,

present them with it, not doubting it may one day encourage some worthy

undertaker.

You take fair correct copies, well bound in calf’s skin and lettered at

the back, of all modern bodies of arts and sciences whatsoever, and in

what language you please. These you distil in _balneo Mariæ_, infusing

quintessence of poppy Q.S., together with three pints of lethe, to be had

from the apothecaries. You cleanse away carefully the _sordes_ and

_caput mortuum_, letting all that is volatile evaporate. You preserve

only the first running, which is again to be distilled seventeen times,

till what remains will amount to about two drams. This you keep in a

glass vial hermetically sealed for one-and-twenty days. Then you begin

your catholic treatise, taking every morning fasting (first shaking the

vial) three drops of this elixir, snuffing it strongly up your nose. It

will dilate itself about the brain (where there is any) in fourteen

minutes, and you immediately perceive in your head an infinite number of

abstracts, summaries, compendiums, extracts, collections, medullas,

excerpta quædams, florilegias and the like, all disposed into great order

and reducible upon paper.

I must needs own it was by the assistance of this arcanum that I, though

otherwise _impar_, have adventured upon so daring an attempt, never

achieved or undertaken before but by a certain author called Homer, in

whom, though otherwise a person not without some abilities, and for an

ancient of a tolerable genius; I have discovered many gross errors which

are not to be forgiven his very ashes, if by chance any of them are left.

For whereas we are assured he designed his work for a complete body of

all knowledge, human, divine, political, and mechanic {102a}, it is

manifest he hath wholly neglected some, and been very imperfect perfect

in the rest. For, first of all, as eminent a cabalist as his disciples

would represent him, his account of the _opus magnum_ is extremely poor

and deficient; he seems to have read but very superficially either

Sendivogus, Behmen, or Anthroposophia Theomagica {102b}. He is also

quite mistaken about the _sphæra pyroplastica_, a neglect not to be

atoned for, and (if the reader will admit so severe a censure) _vix

crederem autorem hunc unquam audivisse ignis vocem_. His failings are

not less prominent in several parts of the mechanics. For having read

his writings with the utmost application usual among modern wits, I could

never yet discover the least direction about the structure of that useful

instrument a save-all; for want of which, if the moderns had not lent

their assistance, we might yet have wandered in the dark. But I have

still behind a fault far more notorious to tax this author with; I mean

his gross ignorance in the common laws of this realm, and in the doctrine

as well as discipline of the Church of England. A defect, indeed, for

which both he and all the ancients stand most justly censured by my

worthy and ingenious friend Mr. Wotton, Bachelor of Divinity, in his

incomparable treatise of ancient and modern learning; a book never to be

sufficiently valued, whether we consider the happy turns and flowings of

the author’s wit, the great usefulness of his sublime discoveries upon

the subject of flies and spittle, or the laborious eloquence of his

style. And I cannot forbear doing that author the justice of my public

acknowledgments for the great helps and liftings I had out of his

incomparable piece while I was penning this treatise.

But besides these omissions in Homer already mentioned, the curious

reader will also observe several defects in that author’s writings for

which he is not altogether so accountable. For whereas every branch of

knowledge has received such wonderful acquirements since his age,

especially within these last three years or thereabouts, it is almost

impossible he could be so very perfect in modern discoveries as his

advocates pretend. We freely acknowledge him to be the inventor of the

compass, of gunpowder, and the circulation of the blood; but I challenge

any of his admirers to show me in all his writings a complete account of

the spleen. Does he not also leave us wholly to seek in the art of

political wagering? What can be more defective and unsatisfactory than

his long dissertation upon tea? and as to his method of salivation

without mercury, so much celebrated of late, it is to my own knowledge

and experience a thing very little to be relied on.

It was to supply such momentous defects that I have been prevailed on,

after long solicitation, to take pen in hand, and I dare venture to

promise the judicious reader shall find nothing neglected here that can

be of use upon any emergency of life. I am confident to have included

and exhausted all that human imagination can rise or fall to.

Particularly I recommend to the perusal of the learned certain

discoveries that are wholly untouched by others, whereof I shall only

mention, among a great many more, my “New Help of Smatterers, or the Art

of being Deep Learned and Shallow Read,” “A Curious Invention about

Mouse-traps,” “A Universal Rule of Reason, or Every Man his own Carver,”

together with a most useful engine for catching of owls. All which the

judicious reader will find largely treated on in the several parts of

this discourse.

I hold myself obliged to give as much light as possible into the beauties

and excellences of what I am writing, because it is become the fashion

and humour most applauded among the first authors of this polite and

learned age, when they would correct the ill nature of critical or inform

the ignorance of courteous readers. Besides, there have been several

famous pieces lately published, both in verse and prose, wherein if the

writers had not been pleased, out of their great humanity and affection

to the public, to give us a nice detail of the sublime and the admirable

they contain, it is a thousand to one whether we should ever have

discovered one grain of either. For my own particular, I cannot deny

that whatever I have said upon this occasion had been more proper in a

preface, and more agreeable to the mode which usually directs it there.

But I here think fit to lay hold on that great and honourable privilege

of being the last writer. I claim an absolute authority in right as the

freshest modern, which gives me a despotic power over all authors before

me. In the strength of which title I do utterly disapprove and declare

against that pernicious custom of making the preface a bill of fare to

the book. For I have always looked upon it as a high point of

indiscretion in monstermongers and other retailers of strange sights to

hang out a fair large picture over the door, drawn after the life, with a

most eloquent description underneath. This has saved me many a

threepence, for my curiosity was fully satisfied, and I never offered to

go in, though often invited by the urging and attending orator with his

last moving and standing piece of rhetoric, “Sir, upon my word, we are

just going to begin.” Such is exactly the fate at this time of Prefaces,

Epistles, Advertisements, Introductions, Prolegomenas, Apparatuses, To

the Readers’s. This expedient was admirable at first; our great Dryden

has long carried it as far as it would go, and with incredible success.

He has often said to me in confidence that the world would never have

suspected him to be so great a poet if he had not assured them so

frequently in his prefaces, that it was impossible they could either

doubt or forget it. Perhaps it may be so. However, I much fear his

instructions have edified out of their place, and taught men to grow

wiser in certain points where he never intended they should; for it is

lamentable to behold with what a lazy scorn many of the yawning readers

in our age do now-a-days twirl over forty or fifty pages of preface and

dedication (which is the usual modern stint), as if it were so much

Latin. Though it must be also allowed, on the other hand, that a very

considerable number is known to proceed critics and wits by reading

nothing else. Into which two factions I think all present readers may

justly be divided. Now, for myself, I profess to be of the former sort,

and therefore having the modern inclination to expatiate upon the beauty

of my own productions, and display the bright parts of my discourse, I

thought best to do it in the body of the work, where as it now lies it

makes a very considerable addition to the bulk of the volume, a

circumstance by no means to be neglected by a skilful writer.

Having thus paid my due deference and acknowledgment to an established

custom of our newest authors, by a long digression unsought for and a

universal censure unprovoked, by forcing into the light, with much pains

and dexterity, my own excellences and other men’s defaults, with great

justice to myself and candour to them, I now happily resume my subject,

to the infinite satisfaction both of the reader and the author.

A Tale of a Tub · 第 5 / 11 章