In 1775 Arne wrote the following letter to Garrick: "Aug. 21st, 1775.

Dr. Arne presents his best compliments to Mr. Garrick, heartily

returning thanks for his permission to several of his company to

perform in the intended new comedy at the Opera-House, for the Doctor's

advantage. He is unluckily, and indeed ungenteelly cut out of, at

least, a clear £100, by Mrs. Greville's accepting and promising to

perform the principal comic character, and, after keeping it near three

weeks when it was too late to substitute another, returning the part

with frivolous excuses. The Doctor knows not whether he is rightly

informed; but he has heard that Mr. Garrick discharged Mr. Dibdin. If

(as he has likewise been told, Mr. Garrick has engaged Mr. Arne[22]

in the other's place, the Doctor can better reconcile _his_ being

neglected; otherwise should have thought himself at least as capable

of the business as any other person, and that his name and credit in

the profession would have brought no disgrace on his friendly employer.

Cannot help regretting likewise that, though he has ever maintained

the most cordial respect and regard to Mr. Garrick for many signal

good qualities, as well as for his being incontestably the first genius

of this age in all that he professes,) any young person's belonging

to _him_, though ever so conspicuous for his abilities, is sufficient

cause for his rejection. These unkind prejudices the Doctor can no

otherwise account for, than as arising from an irresistible apathy, to

which (though painfully) he submits; but will never (notwithstanding)

deviate a tittle from that respect, with which he has ever been Mr.

Garrick's most obedient servant."

To this letter Garrick replied: "Drury Lane Theatre, Aug. 24, 1775.

DEAR SIR,--I am very sorry that Mrs. Greville (to whom I gave free

leave to assist you) should behave so ill to you, and more so, that

your loss will be so great by her ill-behaviour. The managers of

Drury-lane have no intention to employ a constant composer, but to

engage with different gentlemen, as business may arise in the theatre.

How can you imagine that I have an irresistible _apathy_ to you? I

suppose you mean _antipathy_, my dear Doctor, by the general turn

of your letter. Be assured, as my nature is very little inclined to

apathy, so it is as far from conceiving an antipathy to you or any

genius in this or any other country. You ask me why I will not make

use of your pupils?--Shall I tell you fairly? because I have not the

opinion of them which you have. I tried Mrs. Bradford, Miss Weller,

and I have now Mr. Fawcet: the two first (as I in a most friendly

manner foretold) did no credit to you or myself by appearing in a piece

which you obstinately insisted on bringing out, though you knew it

would be the means of making a coolness between us. In short, dear

sir, your heart and your genius seem more inclined to the theatre

of Covent-Garden than that of Drury-Lane; and when I consider the

additional music to 'King Arthur,' and the music to 'Elfrida,' I trust

that I am justified in my opinion. Whether I am mistaken or not, I have

not the least antipathy, I give you my honour I have not, to Doctor

Arne; but on the contrary, if I had a work of consequence, I should

wish to employ him, notwithstanding that our theatrical connections

have not yet been serviceable to either of us. I am, dear Sir, your

very sincere well wisher, and humble Servant. DAVID GARRICK."

To this conciliatory epistle Dr. Arne replied in the following month:

"Sept. 3rd 1775. DEAR SIR.--I received the favour of your reply to

my letter, which I could not doubt of, you never being deficient in

politeness. You are certainly in the right to suppose that, if I wrote

the word apathy, I meant antipathy. Did I make the blunder or is it a

joke, like Mrs. Cibber's asking you how you could possibly spell King

with a Q? I must beg your permission to assure you that you are greatly

mistaken in two points. First, when you imagine that I have the least

partiality either in favour of the other theatre or its patentees: next

in saying that the music in 'Elfrida' is much superior to the music I

composed for you in 'King Arthur.' The principal songs, which for air

and mastership I have never excelled, have _not_ been performed. They

were written for the late Mrs. Arne,[23] and fashioned to her sweet

voice, and glaring abilities. Mr. Arne expected, from the music and

her performances of it, that they would be productive of the highest

pleasure, that a judicious audience ever received from either of our

endeavours, and several eminent masters thought as he did: but when

those _coups de maître_ came out of the mouths of persons who could

neither sing in time nor tune, nor turn out one _jeu de la voix_ in

them, the result was much the same as if an approved author had written

a fine part for ----. I was near hurting your delicacy, in nominating

a gentleman, with whose acquaintance I am honoured, and this part,

through an unfortunate event, should be acted by Jemmy Raftor, or

Dagger Marr. Champness's songs, the chorus in the first scene of Mr.

Vernon's 'Come, if you dare,' and several other things that employed my

utmost efforts, were laid aside, in favour of Purcell's music, which

(though excellent in its kind) was Cathedral, and not to the taste of

a modern theatrical audience. But never was my surprise greater than

when I perceived that a drama so fertile of invention and elegant in

poetry, which brought so much to Harry Gifford, and lately in Dublin

should (though strongly performed at a vast expense at Drury-lane) fail

in making that impression on the public, which the managers had an

undoubted right to expect. You frankly say that you have not engaged

any of my pupils, because you have not the same opinion of them that

I have. Be pleased to remember that I did not recommend Miss Weller

as an accomplished singer; but as a young girl, with a good person,

who would be useful in musical pieces; but whose talents in speaking

and acting, might, with your friendly encouragement, in a little time

bring so pretty a figure to be a shining object. Had you seen her

play Mrs. Cadwallader in Foote's farce at Covent Garden, your candour

would induce you to think with that company, who all declared that

no young actress ever did better. When I offered you this girl, you

wanted an accomplished singer. When I recommended Miss Jameson as such,

I was to whistle an angel from Heaven, or you were full; though you

brought out a raw nothing last year, and have taken Mrs. Jewell and

a Jewess[24] this season. I hope you will, as you have kindly done,

excuse this frankness in me, and give me leave to add that I will

positively bet a hundred pounds upon Miss Jameson, against any singer

you can name in either theatre--I might safely a hundred to one. I

wish you would ponder on the contents--not now, because your cast is

rather overloaded--but hereafter, when it may not be so. And now, Sir,

to the last matter I shall at present trouble you with. Bickerstaff

added songs to the Oracle, and brought it out by the title of 'Daphne

and Amintor,' at Drury Lane, which succeeded very well. I remember a

piece of Mr. Lloyd's, called the 'Capricious Lovers,' when performed in

Clive's time. Every body liked the Burletta, but none were pleased with

the music--which has induced me to reset it. Now, Sir, if you think

it will (with the addition of my new music) fill up a vacancy, till

the town fills, the vocal, instrumental, and speaking parts, are ready

drawn out: the title may, and should be altered to 'The Country Girl

at Court,' being the original one, viz.: 'La Contadina in Cort,' and

(for a sixth night) I will attend the getting up of the musical part,

and deliver up the composition to your use. If you don't want it, make

no ceremony in saying so; for it will be of use to me, with my catches

and glees. Have I been studying the longitude? Perhaps so; but if I

have tired you, it is more than _you_ could do by _me_, were you to

fill a ream of paper.

"This requires no other answer, than just whether you can, with

advantage to your undertaking, make use of my new composition or not. I

am, Sir, with due respects, ever your friend and humble servant,

"THOMAS AUGUSTINE ARNE."

There is another letter from Arne to Garrick, without date; it reads as

follows:

"DEAR SIR,--Mr. Johnston informing me of your desire to receive my

demand for the composition of the music in 'The Little Gipsy,' I

beg leave to expatiate a little thereon. I think a musician, with

regard to theatrical employment, under an unfortunate predicament,

if comparatively considered with the author of any little piece, for

the following reason. They should both have learning, invention, and

a perfect knowledge of effects; but an author of a _petite pièce_ can

instantaneously write down his thoughts as they arise, whereas, the

poor musician, when he has conceived an air, in every respect suitable

to the sense, and emphatically expressed in every part, has done but

half his business; for he has all the instrumental accompaniments to

study and write down; insomuch as, that in a composition of ten,

twelve, or more different parts, when he has written a whole side of

music paper, he has the mortification to have composed but one line;

all, except the voice part, being requisite to that one line. And yet

an author of a farce will frequently make upwards of £100 by his sixth

night, besides £50 by the sale of his copy to the printer; while the

poor devil of a crotchet monger is thought well paid with £50 for six

times the study and labour. This last observation, though strictly

just, is not, in me, productive of a single complaint or grumble; but

convictive that I have taken infinite pains to be master of a scurvy

profession. As to my bill, it amounts, at my constant and reasonable

rule of charging, but to £45 13 6: If you should think I have employed

extraordinary time and care to make the composition proper and perfect

in its kind, you will not overpay me with £50. But do as you please;

I shall be satisfied, and am, with true respects, Dear Sir, your most

obedient servant,

"THOMAS AUGUSTINE ARNE."

This letter is endorsed by Garrick, "Dr. Arne, about bill for 'May

Day.' I gave him the £50 desired."

"May Day, or the Little Gipsy," a musical farce in one act, by David

Garrick, was produced at Drury Lane Theatre on the 28th of August, 1775.

There is much to be learned from the correspondence which passed

between Arne and Garrick; the following letter, undated, is full of

interest:

"DEAR SIR,--I was never so conceited of any abilities, as _non cedere

majoribus_; but then I ever was above servility, and could not pay a

compliment to the opinion of Socrates or Seneca, at the expense of my

reason. _Humanum est errare_, therefore the main study of every wise

man is to arrive at rectitude, which cannot possibly be accomplished by

giving an implicit concession to our first determinations. But shall

Arne, a _musician_, have the _hardiesse_ to dispute with Garrick, in

his _own_ way?--Yes, if Garrick, not giving himself time to debate

on the natural effects arising from their causes, peremptorily gives

his _ego dixi_ to what does not (to Arne) appear natural. But where

Garrick is pleased to exercise his judgment, as in his own parts, by a

fair trial of his opinion pro and con? No, Arne would as soon dispute

with Sir Isaac Newton (if living) on his doctrine of colours, _sed ad

propositum_.

"When Miss Weller rehearsed part of Polly's character in the

green-room, I knew it would be in vain to attempt a justification of

her manner, at that juncture, and therefore reserved my sentiments

for this occasion. I shall only particularize the soliloquy, 'Now

I'm a wretch indeed,' which, in all the Polly's I ever saw, had no

effect on the audience, except when Mrs. Cibber played the character,

who spoke and acted in the same manner as Miss Weller does; and Mr.

Barry had the same idea of it. In _you_ this position is glaringly

illustrated. Now, in regard to Polly's situation, it is this. She has

been soliciting her husband's life with her parents, which, instead

of moving their obdurate hearts, has had no other effect, than her

father's leaving her mother with a determination to prepare matters at

the Old Bailey for his death. Polly, overhearing this, comes on in an

agony of grief, says, 'Now I'm a wretch indeed!'--thinks she sees him

already in the cast--that she hears vollies of sighs from the windows

in Holborn--then abruptly breaks out--'I see him at the tree--the

whole circle are in tears--even butchers weep.' Can it be natural that

the sight of a beloved husband at the gallows should excite fainter

emotions in a doting wife, than arise in butchers exercised in offices

of cruelty? Would not an apple-woman, who should see so fine a youth,

merely in the cast, naturally clap her hands together, through depth

of concern, and exclaim 'Ah, poor soul! God bless him and take him to

his mercy!'--perhaps shed tears? Certainly; then Polly's emotion on

figuring him at the fatal tree, where the whole circle, through mere

humanity, are in tears, can be nothing short of distraction, and any

action, short of the force she gave it, must appear trifling, faint,

and unfeeling. You are far from having seen the best of her in that

character, which appears in her scenes of love, fondness, fears, and

strokes of tenderness with Mackheath. But I was not willing to give

you too much trouble, and besides, I plainly saw that you could not

divest yourself of prepossession; else, how was it possible that a fine

voice both for speaking and singing; action open, easy, and graceful;

an unexceptionable person and figure, with a countenance free from

the least distortion, could be productive of such faint approbation?

You have often said you regarded me--but, as in the case of Miss

Brent, were I to produce an angel, her being ushered by _me_ would

create coolness and indifference. This observation, which I could more

forcibly illustrate, I plainly see has put you out of humour. Give

me leave to say, so it has _me_, who am not without my feeling on so

mortifying an occasion. You are possessed both of fortune and merit;

the one considerable, the other supreme. I pay you no particular

respect, on account of the former; but the highest imaginable on

account of the latter. Providence, by placing you in this beneficial

situation, meant you as the sun and rain, to cheer and water plants

of _genius_. Your own talents, and the just encouragement they have

met with, demand, as a debt, those beneficent offices from you. The

pay given to three _nothings_ would be a suitable reward to a rising,

promising genius, whose industry and advancement could never fail of

repaying you ten fold in return. Having faithfully kept my promise to

take no material step, without first acquainting you with my design,

and therefore given you a fair offer of Miss Weller, I will trouble you

with no more letters, or applications on her account; so shall only

add, that if you are inclined to encourage and cherish _her_, as you

have done by _many_ others, with much lesser talents and requisites, I

am desirous, and immediately ready to give you the preference; but if

otherwise, as I have only my _small merit and hard labour to subsist

on_, let it never be a matter of the least difference between us, that

I have acted like a man of honour, and you----overlooked a jewel. I am,

Sir, as I ever was, your sincere friend, and most obedient servant,

"THO^{S.} AUG^{NE.} ARNE."

No reply to the above can be found. The following letter from Arne

to Garrick must have been written soon after the above: "Sept. 3rd.

DEAR SIR,--Having just received a letter from the ingenious author of

the two operas, and 'Pennyworth of Wit,' under your kind inspection,

wherein he begs concealment of his name, till the fate of one or other

of his pieces is determined."

Arne enclosed a copy of his unnamed friend's letter, which need not

be produced here. He then finished his own as follows: "Now give me

leave to wish you would consult your assured friend in the musical

productions of your theatre, which (waving your own consequence,

undeniably the first with the public) might produce the best second

dish at the feast. Though half a ghost myself, I have more honour than

the whole ghost in 'Hamlet.' He was forbid to tell the secrets of his

prison house----I tell them not, through principle; but this I _may_

say, _in confidence_, you actually want strength for the exhibition

of musical performances--and why should you?--Mr. Garrick, though

I wish him immortal, to the grief of the discerning world, is not

so--sickness, pain, mortality may intervene. Let it not be said, that

so great a master of his art is deaf or blind to rising merit. I tell

you _bona fide_, that the young woman and young girl [Miss Weller's

sister] whom I recommended, are real objects of your notice, as

handsome women, complete figures, and promising actresses, abstracted

from their utility as singers. Pray be so obliging as to let me hear

from you as soon as you come to town, and be assured that if my skill

or connexions are of any value, they shall be exerted to the utmost,

in testimony of the respect with which I am, Dear Sir, your faithful

friend, and humble servant,

"THO^{S} AUG^{NE.} ARNE."

There is yet another letter from Arne to Garrick, and a characteristic

reply, both undated, but which probably were written in 1775:

"Nov. 17. SIR,--As you have causelessly dropped the friend, I have

sense enough to write at a becoming distance. You will undoubtedly

hear, by the freshest advice, the _tête-à-tête_ alteration between

your brother and me. How could it happen otherwise, when the first

salutation I received was 'Dr. Arne, we have considered of the farce,

and PROTEST AGAINST IT'; which nearly led me into a mistake; for how

could I suppose he meant the farce you had first promised to do, and

after the last rehearsal concluded on? But on his warm repititions, I

found that I should have protested against the farce that has been so

long acting ex-parte managers, and tragedy on the composer's part. I

answered, 'I am not surprised, it tallies exactly with the treatment I

have all along received,' (meaning not only on account of the farce,

but the discharge of two young women,[25] handsome, perfect figures,

and possessed of better talents than most on either stage have set out

with:) I scorn to retract my words, and think Mr. G. Garrick[26] will

equally scorn to aggravate them. The young women brought three very

good houses for the opening of a season, and met with more public

applause than I have ever heard; and though inexperience, mixed with

sensibility, might intimidate Miss Weller so as sometimes to exceed the

exact sound, it was so little that the audience were not susceptible

of it. If you had no intention to retain them, one night's performance

had surely been sufficient for their condemnation; but they had not

then been supplanted by my son's application;--permit me to give you

joy of the acquisition. As to singing in tune, by my salvation! not

above three in both theatres can do it, though several have had nearly

twenty years' experience. I did not, _as has been done to you more than

once_, impose my young pupils on you as finished singers; why then

should they be discharged for what you knew before their appearance,

especially after three warm receptions? Your public declaration this

morning appeared as meant to complete the many shocks which I and mine

have received--it was ineffectual: I shall think myself happy to be

mistaken. If you are willing to show a friendship which I shall deem

an honour to receive, it will not be sufficient that you perform the

piece; I shall have the presumption to hope that you will further

its success; though I fear that the cold breath of the manager, like

a wintry blast, has chilled the hearts of his dependents; it is a

distemper as catching as the itch. There has been but one decent

rehearsal which was in your presence; though, even then, two principals

were absent; nor can I expect any better, till the manager will either

graciously appear, or at least send his general mandate: and, but

for the respect due to the author, I had long since withdrawn the

prettiest music, in the light style, that I ever wrote; but I will not,

uncompelled, incur the resentment of a gentleman, a man of fortune

and a scholar, respected by the first personages of the University of

Oxford, by assuring him, from your promise, that his piece will be

performed with all possible expedition; then, that it is in rehearsal,

and now, by writing him word that you 'protest against it'? I once had

a sparring of this kind with Mr. Rich; he generously acknowledged that

he had not treated me kindly, and misunderstanding was the cement of

our friendship ever after. May this candid explanation prove equally

successful! It shall not be my fault if it does not, being ever

desirous of proving myself, your real humble servant,

"THO^{S.} AUG^{NE.} ARNE."

Garrick's reply is very short and sharp:

"DEAR SIR.--I have read your play and rode your horse, and do not

approve of either. They both want particular spirit which alone can

give pleasure to the reader and the rider. When the one wants wits,

and the other the spur, they both jog on very heavily. I must keep

the horse, but I have returned you the play. I pretend to some little

knowledge of the last; but as I am no jockey, they cannot say that the

knowing one is taken in. I am, Sir, your most obedient servant. D. G."

Endorsed "Designed for Dr. Arne, who sold me a horse, a very dull one;

and sent me a comic opera, ditto."

In 1776, early in the year, Miss Abrams, referred to in a letter from

Dr. Arne to Garrick, made her first appearance on the Drury Lane stage

in Garrick and Arne's "May-day, or the Little Gipsy." She possessed a

sweet voice and good taste, which had been excellently cultivated under

Arne's tuition. At the last rehearsal of the piece, which took place

on the morning of the day of performance, Garrick suddenly conceived

that a dance of rustics would improve the play, and told Dr. Arne of

his idea, adding, "I suppose it would be impossible for you to compose

a tune for it in time?" The Doctor, smiling and rubbing his elbow,

according to his usual practice, replied, "We'll see what can be done,"

and calling for pen, ink, and music paper, sat down at the prompter's

table, and in less than five minutes produced one of the prettiest

dancing tunes ever heard, which, when played by the band, astonished

and delighted Garrick so much that, forgetting his age, he ran up to

the Doctor, and embracing, took him by the hands and danced with him

round the stage with much grace and animation, to the admiration of all

who witnessed it.

Dr. Arne and Rule, Britannia · 第 5 / 9 段