CHAPTER X.

Uncle Roland was gone. Before he went, he was closeted for an hour

with my father, who then accompanied him to the gate; and we all

crowded round him as he stepped into his chaise. When the Captain

was gone, I tried to sound my father as to the cause of so sudden a

departure. But my father was impenetrable in all that related to his

brother's secrets. Whether or not the Captain had ever confided to

him the cause of his displeasure with his son,--a mystery which much

haunted me,--my father was mute on that score, both to my mother

and myself. For two or three days, however, Mr Caxton was evidently

unsettled. He did not even take to his great work; but walked much

alone, or accompanied only by the duck, and without even a book in

his hand. But by degrees the scholarly habits returned to him; my

mother mended his pens, and the work went on.

For my part, left much to myself, especially in the mornings, I

began to muse restlessly over the future. Ungrateful that I was, the

happiness of home ceased to content me. I heard afar the roar of the

great world, and roved impatient by the shore.

At length, one evening, my father, with some modest hums and ha's,

and an-unaffected blush on his fair forehead, gratified a prayer

frequently urged on him, and read me some portions of "the great

Work." I cannot express the feelings this lecture created--they

were something akin to awe. For the design of this book was so

immense--and towards its execution, a learning so vast and various

had administered--that it seemed to me as if a spirit had opened to

me a new world, which had always been before my feet, but which my

own human blindness had hitherto concealed from me. The unspeakable

patience with which all these materials had been collected year

after year--the ease with which now, by the calm power of genius,

they seemed of themselves to fall into harmony and system--the

unconscious humility with which the scholar exposed the stores of

a laborious life;--all combined to rebuke my own restlessness and

ambition, while they filled me with a pride in my father, which

saved my wounded egotism from a pang. Here, indeed, was one of those

books which embrace an existence; like the Dictionary of Bayle, or

the History of Gibbon, or the _Fasti Hellenici_ of Clinton,--it

was a book to which thousands of books had contributed, only to

make the originality of the single mind more bold and clear. Into

the furnace all vessels of gold, of all ages, had been cast, but

from the mould came the new coin, with its single stamp. And

happily, the subject of the work did not forbid to the writer the

indulgence of his _naïve_, peculiar irony of humour--so quiet, yet

so profound. My father's book was the "History of Human Error."

It was, therefore, the moral history of mankind, told with truth

and earnestness, yet with an arch unmalignant smile. Sometimes,

indeed, the smile drew tears. But in all true humour lies its germ,

pathos. Oh! by the goddess Moria or Folly, but he was at home in

his theme! He viewed man first in the savage state, preferring in

this the positive accounts of voyagers and travellers, to the vague

myths of antiquity, and the dreams of speculators on our pristine

state. From Australia and Abyssinia, he drew pictures of mortality

unadorned, as lively as if he had lived amongst Bushmen and savages

all his life. Then he crossed over the Atlantic, and brought before

you the American Indian, with his noble nature, struggling into

the dawn of civilisation, when friend Penn cheated him out of his

birthright, and the Anglo-Saxon drove him back into darkness. He

showed both analogy and contrast between this specimen of our kind,

and others equally apart from the extremes of the savage state and

the cultured. The Arab in his tent, the Teuton in his forests, the

Greenlander in his boat, the Fin in his rein-deer car. Up sprang

the rude gods of the north, and the resuscitated Druidism, passing

from its earliest templeless belief into the later corruptions of

crommell and idol. Up sprang, by their side, the Saturn of the

Phœnicians, the mystic Budh of India, the elementary deities of the

Pelasgian, the Naith and Serapis of Egypt, the Ormuzd of Persia, the

Bel of Babylon, the winged genii of the graceful Etruria. How nature

and life shaped the religion; how the religion shaped the manners;

how, and by what influences, some tribes were formed for progress;

how others were destined to remain stationary, or be swallowed up

in war and slavery by their brethren, was told with a precision

clear and strong as the voice of Fate. Not only an antiquarian and

philologist, but an anatomist and philosopher--my father brought to

bear on all these grave points, the various speculations involved

in the distinctions of race. He showed how race in perfection

is produced, up to a certain point, by admixture: how all mixed

races have been the most intelligent--how, in proportion as local

circumstance and religious faith permitted the early fusion of

differing tribes, races improved and quickened into the refinements

of civilisation. He tracked the progress and dispersion of the

Hellenes, from their mythical cradle in Thessaly; and showed

how those who settled near the sea-shores, and were compelled

into commerce and intercourse with strangers, gave to Greece her

marvellous accomplishments in arts and letters--the flowers of the

ancient world. How others, like the Spartans, dwelling evermore in

a camp, on guard against their neighbours, and rigidly preserving

their Dorian purity of extraction, contributed neither artists, nor

poets, nor philosophers to the golden treasure-house of mind. He

took the old race of the Celts, Cimry, or Cimmerians. He compared

the Celt who, as in Wales, the Scotch Highlands, in Bretagne, and

in uncomprehended Ireland, retains his old characteristics and

purity of breed, with the Celt whose blood, mixed by a thousand

channels, dictates from Paris the manners and revolutions of the

world. He compared the Norman in his ancient Scandinavian home,

with that wonder of intelligence and chivalry which he became,

fused imperceptibly with the Frank, the Goth, and the Anglo-Saxon.

He compared the Saxon, stationary in the land of Horsa, with the

colonist and civiliser of the globe, as he becomes, when he knows

not through what channels--French, Flemish, Danish, Welch, Scotch,

and Irish--he draws his sanguine blood. And out from all these

speculations, to which I do such hurried and scanty justice, he drew

the blessed truth, that carries hope to the land of the Caffre, the

hut of the Bushman--that there is nothing in the flattened skull

and the ebon aspect that rejects God's law, improvement; that by

the same principle which raises the dog, the lowest of the animals

in its savage state, to the highest after man,--viz. admixture of

race--you can elevate into nations of majesty and power the outcasts

of humanity, now your compassion or your scorn. But when my father

got into the marrow of his theme--when, quitting these preliminary

discussions, he fell pounce amongst the would-be wisdom of the wise;

when he dealt with civilisation itself, its schools, and porticos,

and academies; when he bared the absurdities couched beneath the

colleges of the Egyptians, and the Symposia of the Greeks;--when he

showed that, even in their own favourite pursuit of metaphysics,

the Greeks were children; and in their own more practical region

of politics, the Romans were visionaries and bunglers;--when,

following the stream of error through the middle ages, he quoted the

puerilities of Agrippa, the crudities of Cardan; and passed, with

his calm smile, into the _salons_ of the chattering wits of Paris

in the eighteenth century, oh, then his irony was that of Lucian,

sweetened by the gentle spirit of Erasmus. For not even here was

my father's satire of the cheerless and Mephistophelian school.

From this record of error he drew forth the grand eras of truth. He

showed how earnest men never think in vain, though their thoughts

may be errors. He proved how, in vast cycles, age after age, the

human mind marches on--like the ocean, receding here, but there

advancing. How from the speculations of the Greek sprang all true

philosophy; how from the institutions of the Roman rose all durable

systems of government; how from the robust follies of the North

came the glory of chivalry, and the modern delicacies of honour,

and the sweet harmonising influences of woman. He tracked the

ancestry of our Sidneys and Bayards from the Hengists, Genserics,

and Attilas. Full of all curious and quaint anecdote--of original

illustration--of those niceties of learning which spring from a

taste cultivated to the last exquisite polish--the book amused, and

allured, and charmed; and erudition lost its pedantry now in the

simplicity of Montaigne, now in the penetration of La Bruyère. He

lived in each time of which he wrote, and the time lived again in

him. Ah, what a writer of romances he would have been, if--if what?

If he had had as sad an experience of men's passions, as he had the

happy intuition into their humours. But he who would see the mirror

of the shore, must look where it is cast on the river, not the

ocean. The narrow stream reflects the gnarled tree, and the pausing

herd, and the village spire, and the romance of the landscape. But

the sea reflects only the vast outline of the headland, and the

lights of the eternal heaven.

Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine, Volume 64, No. 393, July 1848 · 第 3 / 9 章