Maurice’s Roger, who had not intellect and meant to be a novelist, was

a gay youth now at Cambridge. His sister Iris had even less intellect

and meant to be a wife. Nature had not fitted her for learning, and

when she left school she merely came out (as the phrase goes). Parties:

these were what Iris liked. Society, not societies. Stanley, aunt-like,

thought it a great pity that Maurice’s offspring were thus, and blamed

Maurice for leaving them too much to Amy. As to Vicky’s children,

Phyllis, who had done quite adequately at Girton, now lived at home

and helped her mother with entertaining and drawing-room meetings,

and was in politics on the whole a Tory; Nancy, at twenty-one, was at

the Slade, learning, so everyone but her teachers believed, to draw

and paint; Hugh was at Cambridge, a lad of good intelligence which he

devoted to the study of engineering; Tony was still at school; and

Imogen was to leave it this summer. Imogen was not for college; she

would, it was generally believed by her teachers and relatives, not

make much of that. Imogen was quite content; she was, as always, busy

writing stories and sunk deep in her own imaginings, which were still

of a very puerile sort. Imogen read a great deal, but was not really

intelligent; it was as if she had not yet grown up. She knew and cared

little about politics or progress. Bernard Shaw was to her merely the

most enchanting of playwrights. She was happy, drugged with poetry (her

own and that of others), and adventurous dreams. She was a lanky slip

of an undeveloped girl, light-footed, active as a cat, but more awkward

with her hands than any creature before her; at once a romantic dreamer

and a tomboyish child, loving school, her friends, active games,

bathing, climbing, reading and writing, animals, W. B. Yeats, Conrad,

Kipling, Henry Seton Merriman, Shelley, William Morris, Stevenson, “A

Shropshire Lad,” meringues, battleships, marzipan, Irene Vanbrugh,

Granville Barker and practically all drama; hating strangers, society,

drawing-room meetings, needlework, love stories, people who talked

about clothes, sentimentalists, and her Aunt Amy. She was at this

time as sexless as any girl or boy may be. She was still, in all her

imaginings, her continuous, unwritten stories about herself, a young

man.

As to Stanley’s children, Irving’s and Una’s, they were still at

school. Stanley watched her son and daughter with hope and joy; they

were such delightful, exciting creatures, and one day they would take

their place in the world and help to upset it and build it up again.

_They_, at least, should certainly join the Fabians when they were

old enough. Billy and Molly should not be slack, uninterested or Tory.

They should join in the game of life as eagerly as now they joined in

treasure hunts, that curious rage of this year which caused young and

old to fall to digging up the earth, seeking for discs.

13

THE YEAR

The year and the government petered towards their end. In the east the

Japanese were beating the Russians, hands down. In the Dogger Bank, the

Russians fired on a fishing-fleet from Hull, and there was trouble.

In European politics, the Anglo-French _entente_ throve, and

Anglo-German rivalry swelled the navies. In Scotland, the Wee Frees

split from the U.P.’s, and fought successfully for the lion’s share

of the loot. In Wales, Evan Roberts’ odd religious revival swept the

country, throwing strong men and women into hysteria and bad men and

women into virtue, reforming the sinners and seriously annoying the

publicans. In the Congo, rubber was grown and collected amid scenes

of distressing cruelty, and reports of the horrid business were

published in this country by Mr. Roger Casement and Mr. E. D. Morel.

In India, Lord Curzon quarrelled with Lord Kitchener. In Thibet, the

British expedition got to Lhassa. In Tangier, the Kaiser Wilhelm of

Germany made a speech. In Ireland, Mr. Wyndham resigned. In London,

the government apathetically stayed in office, the Tariff Reform

campaign raged, treasure discs were dug for, bridge was much played,

the Vedrenne-Barker company acted at the Court Theatre, many books

were published and pictures painted, and money brightly changed hands.

And in the provinces, by-election after by-election was lost to the

government, until at last, in November, Mr. Balfour resigned.

14

ROCKETS

They stood in the new open space at Aldwych, watching the election

results proclaimed by magic lanterns on great screens and flung to

the sky in coloured rockets. They had made up a family election

party--Maurice, Vicky, Charles, Rome, Stanley and Irving, and many

of their young. Stanley had brought Billy and Molly, that they might

rejoice in the great Liberal victory and always remember it. She had

bought them each, at their request, a little clacker, with which to

signal the triumph of right to the world. For to-night was to be a

triumph indeed; liberalism was to sweep the country. Though even

Stanley did not guess to what extent, or how far the inevitable

pendulum had swung.

Imogen was entranced by the dark, clear night, the coloured lights,

the crowd, the excitement, and little thrills ran up and down her as

names and figures and rockets were greeted with cheers and hoots. She

cared nothing for the results; to her the thing was a sporting event on

which she had no money. Aunt Stanley, she knew, had her shirt on the

Liberals. So had Uncle Maurice. But Aunt Rome had nothing either way.

Imogen’s own parents were Conservatives. So, on the whole, was Phyllis,

and Phyllis’s young man. So was Uncle Irving, who was for Tariff

Reform. Probably, on the whole, Liberals were the more right, thought

Imogen. But probably no party was particularly right. How excited they

all got, anyhow, right or wrong!

The Liberals were forging ahead. There was another Manchester division

going up on the screen. Three Manchester seats had already been lost to

the Tories. “Bet you an even twopence it’s a Lib.” Tony was saying.

“Right you are. Oh, it’s Balfour’s....”

“Well, he’s lost it. Hand over.”

The crowd roared with laughter, distress and joy. Balfour out.... What

next?

“Very badly managed,” Irving was complaining all the time, to no one in

particular. “Shockingly mismanaged. The most comic election I ever saw.

There’ll be no Front Bench left.”

“And a jolly good thing.” That was Stanley, getting more and more

triumphant. “There goes Brodrick....”

Imogen felt dazed and happy, and as if she were in a fairy palace, all

blue and red lights. Her upstrained face was stiff and cold, her mouth

open with joy, so that the cold air flowed in. She wasn’t betting any

more, for neither she nor Tony would bet on the Tories now. The Tories

were a dead horse. One was sorry for them, but one couldn’t bet on

them. Did the poor men who lost their seats mind much? Perhaps some of

them were pleased. After all, they had none of them sought or desired

office.... Statesmen always said that of themselves; they only wanted

to get in because they thought they were the ones who would do most

good; always they said that. Divine guidance, they said, had laid this

heavy burden on them, though it was a most frightful bore, and though

the thing they wanted to do was to live in the country and keep pigs.

“If I was in office,” thought Imogen, “I wouldn’t say that. I’d say,

I sought and wanted office, and I’m jolly glad I’ve got it, though I

expect I’ll be rotten at it. I simply love being in power, and thank

you awfully for putting me in, and I hope I’ll stop in for ages.”

How shocked everyone would be. That wasn’t the way public men ever

talked. Would women, if ever they got into Parliament, like Aunt

Stanley wanted them to? Perhaps they would at first, not being used to

proper public manners, but they would soon learn that it wasn’t nice to

talk like that and would begin on the I-never-wanted-it stunt.

More rockets; more blue flares. Lovely. Like a great garden of coloured

flowers. _Night is a garden gay with flowers...._ Hours. Showers.

Dowers. Bowers. Cowers....

_Their flaring blinds the sleepy hours...._ No. _The small dim

hours are lit, are starred._ Better. The rhymes alternately in the

middle and end of the lines, all through. That made it chime, like

bells beneath the sea....

“Lord, what a bungle!” Irving grunted. “It’s all up now. Nothing can

save it now. We may as well go home and get warm. What?”

His fine, dark, clear-cut face was beautiful in the coloured flares,

as he stared up, a cigar in the corner of his mouth. How interesting

people were, thought Imogen, the way they all wanted different things,

and in different ways. There was Uncle Maurice now, smiling over his

briar, as pleased as anything.... And Billy and Molly, silly little

goats, twirling away with their clackers and shouting with Liberal

joy because Aunt Stanley told them to.... Anyhow it couldn’t really

_matter_ who got in. Not matter, like the night, and the lights,

and poetry, and the lovely thrill of it all. Results didn’t matter,

only the thing itself.

“Brrr!” said Vicky, hunching herself together and hugging her muff.

“It’s too cold to watch the wrong side winning any more. Charles, I’m

going home to bed. Come along, all of you, or you’ll catch your deaths.”

“Oh, mother, mayn’t I stay as long as father does?”

“If you like. Very silly of you, Jennie, you’re blue and shivering

already. Stanley, aren’t you going to take those noisy and misguided

children of yours home? It’s nearly midnight.”

“I suppose I must. But what a night for them to remember always.”

What a night, thought Imogen, huddling up in her coat with a happy

shiver, to remember always. Indeed yes. Ecstasy and gaudy blossoms of

the night. _The gaudy blossoms of the night.... Sharp swords of

light...._ Bloss, moss, doss, toss ... toss ought to do....

“There goes Lyttelton. So much for those beastly Chinamen,” cried

Maurice.

15

ON PARTIES

So much for the beastly Chinamen, and so much for the beastly little

loaf and the tax on the People’s Food, so much for class legislation

and sectarian education bills. So much, in fact, for Toryism, for the

happy Liberals were in, and would be in, growing ever less and less

happy, for close on ten years.

“_Now_ we’ll show the world,” said Stanley.

Maurice cynically grinned at her.

“If you mean you think you’re going to get a vote, my dear, you’re off

it. This cabinet hasn’t the faintest intention of accommodating you.

Not the very faintest. And if ever they did put up a bill, they’d never

get it through the Lords. You may send all the deputations you like,

but you won’t move them. Woman’s suffrage is merely the House joke.”

“We’ll see,” said Stanley, who was of a hopeful colour.

“All you can say of Liberals,” said Maurice, who was not, “is that

they’re possibly (not certainly) one better than Conservatives.

However, I’m not crabbing them. They’ve got their chance, and let’s

hope they take it. First they’ve got to undo all the follies the last

government perpetrated. Every government ought to begin with that,

always. Then they’ve got to concentrate on Home Rule. As you say, we

shall see.”

“Anyhow,” said Stanley, “we’ve got our chance.... And there’s the

_Tribune_. Penny liberalism at last.”

“I give it a year,” said Maurice. “If it takes longer dying, Thomasson

is an even more stubborn lunatic than I think him. They’ve started

all right; quite a good first number, only how any Liberal paper can

publish a polite message from that damned Tsar beats one. I believe my

paper is really the only one that insults the Russian government as it

ought to be insulted. All the others either make up to the Tsar for his

armies or butter him up because of the Hague Conference and his silly

prattle about a world peace. It makes one sick. Liberals are as bad as

the rest.”

It was edifying, during the election days, to learn from various

authorities the reasons for the Liberal victory. The _Times_ said

it was the effect, long delayed, of the suffrage reform bills; the

working classes, at last articulate, had determined to dictate their

own policy; no triumph for liberalism, no humiliation for conservatism,

but an experiment on the part of Labour. The _Morning Post_ said

the victory was due to the misrepresentation of Chinese labour by

Liberals, false promises, and the inevitable swing of the pendulum.

The _Daily Mail_ said it was the swing of the pendulum, Chinese

labour, the over continuance in office of the last government, the

Education Act, taxation, unfair food-tax cries, and a liking for

antiquated methods of commerce. The _Daily News_ said it was

a rebellion against reaction, protection and the Little Loaf. The

_Tribune_ said it was a rebellion also against poverty, the

direction of companies by Ministers, and the undoing of the great

Victorian reforms; it was, in fact, the protest of Right against

Force, of the common good against class interest, of the ideal element

in political life against merely mechanical efficiency. (“Mechanical

efficiency!” Maurice jeered. “Much there was of that in the last

government. As to the ideal element, the Liberal ideal is a large loaf

and low taxes. Quite a sound one, but nothing to be smug about.”)

However, the whole press was smug, as always, and so were nearly all

statesmen in public speeches; their cynicism they kept for private

life. Mr. Asquith, for instance, said that this uprising of the

people was due to moral reprobation of the double dealing of the late

government; plain dealing was what they wanted. And Mr. Lloyd George,

in his best vein, spoke of a fearful reckoning. A tornado, he called

it, of righteous indignation with the trifling that had been going

on in high places for years with all that was sacred to the national

heart. The oppression of Nonconformists at home, the staining of the

British flag abroad with slavery, the rivetting of the chains of the

drink traffic on the people of this country--against all these had the

people risen in wrath. It was a warning to ministers not to trifle with

conscience, or to menace liberty in a free land. The people meant to

save themselves; the dykes had been opened, and reaction in all its

forms would be swept away by the deluge.

Mr. Balfour, less excited and more philosophic, observed, at his own

defeat at Manchester, that, after all, the Tories had been in office

ten years, and would doubtless before long be in office again, and

that these oscillations of fortune would and did always occur. He

was probably nearer the truth about the elections than most of those

who pronounced upon them. It is a safe assertion that no government

is popular for long; get rid of it and let’s try another, for anyhow

another can’t be sillier, is the voter’s very natural and proper

feeling. The sophisticated voter knows that it will almost certainly be

as silly, but, after all, it seems only fair to let each side have its

innings.

Anyhow, and whatever the reasons that brought liberalism into power,

there it was. It was expressed by a House which was at present, and

before its enthusiasms were whittled away in action, composed largely

of political and social theorists, men new to politics and brimming

with plans. Mr. H. W. Massingham said it was the ablest Parliament he

had ever known, but not the most distinguished.

16

DREADNOUGHT

Imogen saved up her pocket money for the cheap excursion fare to

Portsmouth, and slipped off there alone, on a raw February morning, by

the special early train, to see the King launch the _Dreadnought_.

The _Dreadnought_ was a tremendous naval event. She displaced

19,900 tons, beating the _Dominion_ and the _King Edward VII_

by 1,200 tons, and she would make 21 knots to their 16.5, and had

turbine engines, and carried ten 12-inch guns, and her outline was

smooth and lovely and unbroken by casemates, for she was built for

speed. Imogen had to go. She slipped off without a word at home, for

she had a cough and objections would have been raised. She stood wedged

for hours in a crowd on the docks in cold rain that pitted the heaving

green harbour seas, and coughed. She did not command a view of the

actual launching, but would see the splendid creature as she left the

slip and took the water. Before that there was a service; the service

appointed to be used at the launching of the ships of His Majesty’s

Navy. “They that go down to the sea in ships: and occupy their business

in great waters; These men see the works of the Lord: and his wonders

in the deep. For at his word the stormy wind ariseth: which lifteth up

the waves thereof. They are carried up to the heaven, and down again to

the deep: their soul melteth away because of the trouble. They reel to

and fro and stagger like a drunken man: and are at their wit’s end....”

After this, Hymn 592 (A & M) was irritating and silly, but hymns cannot

be helped, bishops will have them.

Then the King smashed the bottle of wine on her and, christened, she

took the water. She left the slip and came into the view of the crowd,

and a great shout went up. “She’s moving!”

Imogen, thrilled, gazed at the lovely, the amazing creature, the giant

of the navy. What a battleship! With professional interest Imogen

examined her points through her father’s field glasses. No openings in

the bulkheads--it was that which gave her her smooth, fleet look. She

was made for a running fight. She was glorious.

Imogen travelled home wet through, shivering, her cough tearing at her

chest, and went to bed for a month with bronchitis. So much for the

navy, said Vicky crossly. But the amazing grey ship was a comfort to

Imogen through her fevered waking dreams.

17

AT THE FARM

Imogen, bow and arrows in hand, crawled through the wood, beneath

overhanging boughs of oaks and elders and beeches and the deep green

arms of pines, that shut the little copse from the August sun into a

fragrant gloom. Every now and then she stopped, listened, and laid her

ear to the mossy ground.

“Three miles off and making a bee line south,” she observed, frowning.

“My God.”

“Michael crawled on,” she continued, “crawling, keeping his head low,

so as not to afford a target for any stray arrows. Who knew what

sinister shadows lurked in the forest, to right and to left?... Hist!

What was that sound? Something cracked in the tangle of scrub near

him.... A Cherokee on a lone trail, possibly.... A Cherokee: the most

deadly of the Red Tribes.... Cold sweat stood out on Michael’s brow.

Could he reach the camp in time? Again he laid his ear to the ground

and listened. They were only two miles now, and still that swift,

terrible, travelling.... The sun beat upon his head and neck; he felt

dizzy and sick. Suppose he fainted before he reached his goal.... That

damned cracking in the bushes again.... Good God!... out of the thicket

sprang a huge Redskin, uttering the horrid war-whoop of the Cherokee,

which, once heard, is never forgotten. Michael leaped to his feet,

pulled his bow-string to his ear, let fly....”

Imogen too let fly.

“Missed him,” she muttered, and swarmed nimbly up the gnarled trunk of

an oak until she reached the lower boughs, from whence she looked down

into a fierce red face, eagle-nosed, feather-crowned.

“Oh, Big Buffalo,” she softly called. “Will you parley?”

Big Buffalo grunted, and they parleyed. If Michael would betray

the whereabouts of his friends, Big Buffalo would grant him his

life. If not, no such easy death as the arrow awaited him, “for we

Cherokees well understand the art of killing....” Michael, sick with

fear, betrayed his friends, and Big Buffalo left him, primed with

information. (In common with other heroes of fiction, Michael never

thought of giving incorrect or misleading information.)

“Michael lay in the forest, his head upon his arms. What had he done?

There was no undoing it now. Why didn’t I choose the stake? Oh, damn,

why didn’t I....”

It was too warm, sweet and drowsy for prolonged remorse. Michael forgot

his shame. The breeze in the pine trees sang like low harps.... The

shadowy copse was soaked in piney sweetness, golden and dim. Michael,

with his bow, his Redskins, and his broken honour, faded out in the

loveliness of the hour.

Ecstasy descended on the wood; enchantment held it, saturating it with

golden magic. Ants and little wood-beetles scuttled over Imogen’s

outstretched hands and bare, rough head. Rabbits bobbed and darted

close to her. She was part of the woods, caught breathless into that

fairy circle like a stolen, enchanted child.

“I am full of the Holy Ghost,” said Imogen. “This is the Holy

Ghost....” And loveliness shook her, as a wind shakes a leaf. These

strange, dizzy moments lurked hidden in the world like fairies in

a wood, and at any hour they sprang forth and seized her, and the

emotion, however often repeated, was each time as keen. They would

spring forth and grip her, turning the dædal earth to magic, at any

lovely hour, in wood or lane or street, or among the wavering candles

and the bread and wine. She was stabbed through and through with beauty

sweet as honey and sharp as a sword, and it was as if her heart must

break in her at its turning. After this brief intensity of joy or

pain, whichever it was, it was as if something in her actually did

break, scattering loose a drift of pent-up words. That was how poems

came. After the anguished joy, the breaking loose of the words, then

the careful stringing of them together on a chain, the fastidious,

conscious arranging. Then the setting them down, and reading them over,

and the happy, dizzy (however erroneous) belief that they were good....

That was how poems came, and that was life at its sharpest, its highest

intensity. Afterwards, one sent them to papers, and it was pleasant and

gratifying if other people saw them and liked them too. But all that

was a side-issue. Vanity is pleasant, gratified ambition is pleasant,

earning money is very pleasant, but these are not life at its highest

power. You might at once burn every poem you wrote, but you would still

have known life.

The song the pines hummed became words, half formed, drifting,

sweet.... Imogen listened, agape, like an imbecile. It was a lovely,

jolly, woody thing that was being sung to her ... she murmured it

over....

A bell rang, far away. Sharply time’s voice shivered eternity to

fragments. Imogen yawned, got up, brushed pine needles out of her hair

and clothes, took up her bow, and strolled out of fairyland. It was

tea-time at the farm.

As she sauntered through the little wood, she shot arrows at the

trees and stopped to retrieve them. Then she found a long, sharp

stick, pointed, like a spear, and became a knight in a Norman forest.

She encountered another knight, a hated foe. There was a fight _à

outrance_. They fenced, parried, lunged....

“Swerve to the right, son Roger, he said,

When you catch his eye through the helmet’s slit;

Swerve to the right, then out at his head,

And the Lord God give you joy of it....”

A swinging thrust....

“Got him, pardie!”

“Hullo.”

Imogen faced about, and there, on the cart track between the wood and

the home farm, stood her Uncle Ted, large and red in breeches and

gaiters, his pipe between his teeth.

“Oh, hullo, Uncle Ted.”

Imogen had turned red. She had been seen making an ass of herself alone

in the wood. Behaving like a maniac. Damn.

“Anything the matter? Got the staggers, have you?” asked Uncle Ted, as

if she were a cow.

“No, I’m all right. Looking for arrows and things, that’s all.”

“Oh, I see.... Comin’ up to tea?”

They walked across the home field together. Imogen was sulky and

ashamed. She was emptied of enchantment and the Holy Ghost, and was

nothing but an abrupt, slangy, laconic girl, going sullenly in to tea,

feeling an ass. Uncle Ted was thinking farmer’s thoughts, of crops and

the like, not of Imogen.

But afterwards he said to Una, “Not quite all there, eh, that girl

of Vicky’s? Flings herself about in the wood when she’s alone, like

someone not right, and talks to herself, too. Nineteen, is she? It’d be

right enough if she was twelve. But at eighteen or nineteen....”

“Oh, Imogen’s all right. She’s childish for her age, that’s all.”

Una took everyone for granted.

“Childish, yes. That’s what I say. They ought to have her seen to.

Gabbles, too. I can’t make out half she’s saying.... Katie may do her

good, I daresay. Katie’s got sense.... It’s against a girl, going on

like that. No sensible young fellow would like it. They ought to have

her seen to. What?”

“Oh, she’s all right,” said Una again. “There she is in the field

playing rounders with the others quite sensibly, you see.”

“I daresay. She may be all right at games, but she oughtn’t to be let

loose alone in woods. She’ll get herself talked about....”

Katie too thought Imogen mad. But quite nicely mad. Harmless. Like

a kid. Katie was a few months younger, but she felt that Imogen was

a kid. She said and did such mad things. And she lacked the most

elementary knowledge; she didn’t know the first thing, for instance,

about clothes, what they were made of, and how they should be made. She

was like an imbecile about them; didn’t care, either. She would stare,

pleased and admiring, at Katie, who had beauty, as if Katie were a

lovely picture, but she never said the right things about her clothes.

You’d think, almost, she didn’t know one material from another.

When they had done playing rounders, and when Imogen and Tony, who was

staying at the farm too, had done damming the brook at the bottom of

the field, and when Tony had gone off rook shooting with his cousin

Dick, Imogen sat by the brook, her bare muddy legs in a pool scaring

minnows, and brooded over life. Rotten it was, being grown up. Simply

rotten. Because you weren’t really grown up. You hadn’t changed at

all. You knew some more, and you cared for a lot of fresh books, but

you liked doing all the things you had liked doing before you grew

up. Climbing, and playing Red Indians, and playing with soldiers, and

walking on stilts. But when you put your hair up, you had to hide all

sorts of things away, like a guilty secret. You could play real games,

like tennis and cricket and hockey and rounders, and even football,

and you could perhaps do the other things with someone else, but

not alone. If people found you alone up a tree, or climbing a roof,

or listening with your ear to the ground, or astride on a wall, or

pretending with a sword, they put up their eyebrows and thought you

an ass. Your mother told people you were a tomboy. A tomboy. Imbecile

word. As if girls didn’t like doing nice things as much as boys. Who

started the idea they didn’t, or shouldn’t?... Oh, it was rotten, being

grown up. Grown-up people had a hideous time. They became so queer,

talking so much, wanting to go to parties, and even meetings, and all

kinds of rotten shows. Mother held meetings in the drawing-room, for

good objects. So did Aunt Stanley. Different objects, but equally

good, no doubt. People came to the meetings and jabbered away, and

sometimes you were made to be there, “to learn to take an interest.”

Votes, cruelty to animals or children, sweated labour, bazaars, white

slaves, the Conservative party, the Liberal party.... What did any of

them matter? Phyllis was good at them. But now Phyllis was going to be

married. And Nancy was at the Slade, and wouldn’t attend the meetings;

she was too busy drawing and going to dances and parties. The modern

girl, mother said; independent, selfish, dashing about with young men

and no chaperons. The Edwardian young woman, so different from the

Victorian young woman.... Only Aunt Rome said she was not different,

but just the same.... Anyhow, Nancy wouldn’t take her turn at the

meetings. So Imogen, younger and more docile, was being trained up. But

she would never be any good. She hated them. Why shouldn’t the boys

take their turn? No one made them. It wasn’t fair.

Imogen kicked viciously at the minnows. Rotten, being a girl....

Perhaps she would run away to sea ... round the world ... the South Sea

Islands....

It was getting chilly. Imogen drew her legs out of the brook and dried

them on her handkerchief. Filthy they were, with mud. She put on her

stockings and old tennis shoes, and wondered what next. Tony was still

rooking. One might go and catch the colt in the meadow and ride him....

Katie appeared over the hunched shoulder of the field.

“Imogen, do you want to come and milk? It’s time.... Oh, I say, you

_are_ in a mess. You ass, what’ve you been up to?”

“Only damming the brook, and wading. Yes, I want to milk, rather.”

“Hurry up then.”

Katie was as beautiful as a June morning. As beautiful as Una. Pale as

milk, with eyes like violets and dark, clustering curls. And clever.

She could do nearly everything. Imogen, six months older, was as nought

beside her. But Katie liked her, and was very kind to her. Katie had

just left Roedean; she had been captain of the school hockey team, and

was going now to play for Essex. A splendid girl. Imogen believed that

Katie had none of the dark and cold forebodings, the hot excitements,

the black nightmares, the sharp, sweet ecstasies, the mean and base

feelings, that assailed herself, any more than Katie would be found

making an ass of herself playing in a wood. Katie, like her mother,

was balanced. This tendency to believe that others are balanced, and

are not rent by the sad and glad storms which one’s own soul knows, is

common to many. One supposes it to be because human beings put such a

calm face on things, so the heart alone knows its own turbulence.

Imogen grinned at Katie, and went with her to the milking.

18

HIGHER THOUGHT

Papa had aged very much in the last two years since mamma had died.

He had had wonderful experiences; he had constantly spoken with,

even seen, mamma; it had made him very happy. But he was aware that

the séances greatly strained and fatigued him. He slept badly; his

nerves seemed continually on edge. Further, he could not by any means

overcome the distaste he felt for the medium who made it her special

business to open the door between him and mamma. A common little

person, he could not help, even in his charity, thinking her. And

Flossie, the spirit on the Other Side, who spoke for mamma (except on

those rare occasions when mamma spoke for herself) was, to judge from

her manner, voice and choice of language, even commoner. And silly.

Papa scarcely liked to admit to himself _how_ silly Flossie seemed

to him to be. Mamma must dislike Flossie a good deal, he sometimes

thought, but then recollected that, where mamma had gone to dwell,

dislike was no more felt, only compassion. He would have liked to ask

mamma, on the rare occasions when she spoke for herself, what she

thought of Flossie, and of Miss Smythe, the medium on this side. But he

did not like to, for Flossie would certainly, and Miss Smythe possibly,

through her trance, hear his question and mamma’s reply. How he longed

for a little private talk, of the kind that mamma and he used to have

of old! But he was not ungrateful. He was in touch with mamma; he knew

her to be extant as a personality, and accessible to him, and that was

surely enough. As to the fatigue, that was a small price to pay.

Then, one tragic day, in the autumn of 1906, came one of those great

exposures which dog the steps of psychical men and women. Some of the

sharp, inquisitive persons who make it their business to nose out

frauds and write to _Truth_ about them, turned their attention

to Miss Smythe and her séances. In a few weeks--these things are very

easy, and do not take long--Miss Smythe was pilloried in the press

as a complete and accomplished fraud. She had, it was made clear

except to the most obstinate believers, never been in a trance, never

called spirits, from the vasty deep, never opened any spiritual doors.

The mechanism of the materialisation was once more discovered and

exposed.... (“What a stale old story,” said Rome. “As if we didn’t know

all about it long ago. These heavy-footed creatures, trampling over

children’s fairylands. Why can’t they let things be?”) ... and even

Flossie, that bright, silly, chatty spirit, was discredited. Flossie

was a quack, and had known about the thimble behind the sofa and the

other things in some cheap, sly way, or else just guessed.

Alas for papa! The gates of paradise clanged in his face; he might

believe by faith that paradise was there, and mamma in it, but the

door between him and it was shut. Great and bitter sorrow shook him,

and shame, for that he had so made cheap his love and mamma’s for the

benefit of common frauds. He sank into inert grief, from which he was

roused, in March 1907, by the call of Higher Thought. The name, in

the first instance, appealed to him. Thought should be higher; it was

usually lower, and very certainly much too low.

“Higher than what, papa dear?” Rome enquired. “These comparatives, in

the air, are so unfinished. Higher education, higher criticism, the

larger hope, the younger generation.... Higher, I mean than what other

thought?”

Than the thought customary on similar subjects, papa supposed.

“These geometrical metaphors,” Rome murmured. “Well, papa, I am sure it

must be very interesting.”

It was very interesting. Papa was introduced to a little temple near

High Street, Kensington, which, when you stepped on the entrance

mat, broke into “God is Love” in electric light over the altar. Here

he worshipped and thought highly, in company with a small but ardent

band of other high thinkers, who were led in prayer by a Guru of

immense power--the power of thought which was not merely higher but

highest--over mind and matter. So great was the power of this Guru that

he not only could cure diseased bodies and souls, but could correct

physical malformations, merely by absent treatment. A lame young man

was brought to him, one of whose legs was shorter than its fellow.

Certainly, said the Guru, this defect would yield to absent treatment.

Further, the treatment would in this case be doubly effective, as

he happened to be about to make a journey to Thibet, to visit the

Lama, the very centre of fervent prayer, absent treatment, and higher

thought. The nearer the Guru got to Thibet, the more powerful would

become, he said, the action of his treatment on the leg of the young

man. And, sure enough, so it proved. The shorter leg began, as the

Guru receded towards Asia, to grow. It grew, and it grew, and it grew.

There came a joyful day when the two legs were of identical length. The

power of absent treatment was triumphantly justified. But it proved to

be a power even greater than the young man and his family had desired

or deserved. For the short leg did not stop when it had caught up

its companion; on the contrary, it seemed to be growing with greater

velocity than before. And indeed, it was; for the Guru, now far beyond

reach of communication by letter or telegram, was journeying ever

deeper and deeper into the great heart of prayer, Holy Thibet, and as

he penetrated it his prayer intensified and multiplied in power, like

the impetus of a ball rolling down hill. The short leg surpassed its

brother, shot on, and on, and on....

It was still shooting on when papa was told of the curious phenomenon.

“Strange,” said papa. “Strange, indeed.”

But it was not these portents, however strange, that papa valued in

his new faith. It was the freedom, the prayerfulness, the rarefied

spiritual atmosphere; in brief, the height. After Miss Smythe, after

the darkened room and the rapping table and the lower thinking of poor

Flossie, it was like a mountain top, where the soul was purged of

commonness.

Mamma, papa sometimes thought, would have approved of Higher Thought;

might even, had she been spared, have become a Higher Thinker herself.

(It should be remembered, in this connection, that papa, since the

exposure of poor Flossie, was no longer in touch with mamma.)

19

LIBERALS IN ACTION

It is a pity to crab all governments and everything they do. For

occasionally it occurs that some government or other (its political

colour is an even chance) passes some measure or other which is not so

bad as the majority of measures. The Liberal government elected in 1906

composed tolerable bills more than once. It even succeeded, though more

rarely, in getting them, in some slightly warped form, tolerated by

the Upper House. The Trades Disputes Bill, for instance, got through.

Either the Lords were caught napping, or they felt they had to let

something through, just to show that things _could_ get through,

as at hoop-la the owner of the booth has, here and there, among

hundreds of objects too large to be ringed by the hoop, one of trifling

value which can fairly be ringed and won, just to show that the thing

can be done. Anyhow, the Trades Disputes Bill did get through, before

the game began of chucking all bills mechanically back, or amending

them out of all meaning so that the Commons disowned them and threw

them away.

Mr. Birrell had no luck with his Education Bill. It was a good,

rational bill, as education bills (a sad theme) go, and no party liked

it much, and the Upper House saw that it would not do at all, and sent

it back plastered all over with amendments that gave it a new and silly

face, like a lady over-much made up. So the Commons would have none of

it, and that was the end, for the moment, of attempts to improve the

management of our elementary schools.

The Lords were now getting into their form, and threw out the Plural

Voting Bill with no nonsense about amendments, and no trouble at all.

After all, what were they there for, if not to throw out? What, indeed,

asked the Lower House, many members of whom had for long wondered. As

to any kind of Woman’s Suffrage Bill, the Commons, as firmly as the

Lords, would have none of it. It was when this was made clear that

the Women’s Social and Political Union, that new, vigorous and vulgar

body, began to bestir itself, and to send bodies of women to waylay

members on their way to the House; in fact, the militant suffragist

nuisance began. There were processions, demonstrations, riots, arrests

and imprisonments. Stanley threw herself into these things at first

with dogged fervour; she did not like them, but held them advantageous

to the Cause. Her niece, Vicky’s Nancy, a very wild young woman,

who enjoyed fighting and making a disturbance on any pretext, threw

herself also into the Cause, fought policemen with vigour, and was

dragged off to prison with joy. Imogen wouldn’t participate in these

public-spirited orgies; she was too shy. And she couldn’t see that it

was any use, either. She had a hampering and rather pedantic sense of

logic, that prevented her from flinging herself into movements with

sentimental ardour; she preferred to know exactly how the methods

adopted were supposed to work, and to see clearly cause and effect,

and no one ever made it precisely clear to her how making rows in the

streets was going to get a suffrage bill passed. It seemed, in fact,

to be working the other way, and alienating some of the few hitherto

sympathetic. Her Aunt Stanley told her, “It’s to show the public and

the government how much we care. They’re crude weapons, but the only

ones we have. Constitutional methods have failed, so far.”

“But, Aunt Stanley, how do you know these are weapons at all?” Imogen

argued.

“We can but try them,” Stanley answered, herself a little doubtful on

the point.

“Anyhow,” she added, “anyhow, no woman who cares about citizenship can

be happy sitting still and doing nothing while we’re denied it. You do

care about the suffrage, don’t you, Imogen?”

“Oh, rather, Aunt Stanley, of course I do. I think it’s awful cheek

not giving it us. There’s no _sense_ in it, is there; no meaning.

Anti-suffragists do talk a lot of rot.... Only don’t you think

suffragists do too, sometimes? I mean, Aunt Stanley, people do so,

when they talk, get off the _point_, don’t they. It would be

a lot easier to be keen if people didn’t talk so much. They talk

_round_, not along. Really, there’s hardly anything to say about

anything; I mean, you could say it all, all that mattered, in a few

sentences. But people go on talking about things for hours, saying

the same things twice, and a lot of other things that don’t really

apply, and everything in hundreds of words when quite a few would do. I

noticed it in the House the other day when we were there. Two-thirds of

what they all said was just flapping about. And they say, ‘I have said

before, Mr. Speaker, and I say again....’ But _why_ do they say

it again? It isn’t awfully good even the first time. I do wonder why

people are like that, don’t you?”

“Soft heads and long tongues, my dear, that’s why. Can’t be helped.

One’s got to bear it and go ahead.... I wish Molly was five years

older; she’ll be so tremendously keen....”

Imogen said nothing to that. She knew Molly, her small elfish cousin

of fourteen, pretty well. Molly, with her short white face and merry,

narrow eyes, and quick wits and easy selfishness and charm, was,

though Imogen couldn’t know that, her father over again, without his

abilities. Imogen was afraid that Molly, when she left school and grew

up, was not going to take that place among the world’s workers that

Aunt Stanley hoped.

As to Billy, a cheerful, stocky Rugby boy of sixteen, he had no views

on the suffrage. He didn’t care. Politics bored him.

Poor Aunt Stanley. Aunt Stanley was a great dear; treated one always

as a friend, not as a niece; explained things, and discussed, and

said what she meant. She was easy to talk to. Easier than Vicky, whom

one loved, but couldn’t discuss things with; one couldn’t formulate

and express one’s ideas and project them into that spate of charming,

inconsequent talk, that swept on gaily over anything one said. Imogen

tried to please Aunt Stanley by seeming really keen about suffrage, but

it was difficult, because the things she actually was keen on were so

many and absorbing that they didn’t leave much time over. Imogen felt

that she was no good at these large, unselfish causes that Aunt Stanley

had at heart; she hadn’t soul enough, or brain enough, or imagination

enough, or something. And she did hate meetings. If one had to sit

indoors in the afternoon, were there not the galleries and theatres,

her point of view was. Perhaps, she thought, Nancy, who enjoyed it,

could do the votes-for-women business for the family.

Meanwhile, Mr. W. H. Dickinson’s Suffrage Bill failed to come to

anything, and it became obvious that the Liberal government, in this

matter, was to be no use at all.

It was quite a question whether it was going to be much use in any

other matter. Poor Law Reform it had postponed; likewise Old Age

Pensions. Licensing Reform was dropped; so was Mr. McKenna’s new

Education Bill, the Land Valuation Bill, and Irish Home Rule. It looked

as if the Liberal programme was running away like wax in the heat and

trouble of the day. How few party programmes, for that matter, ever do

become accomplished achievements! They are frail plants, and cannot

easily come to fruit in the rough air of office. What with one thing,

what with another, they wilt away in flower and die.

To make up for the stagnation of home politics, there was, in 1906 and

1907, plenty of international activity. The nations of Europe were

ostensibly drawing together, a happy family. British journalists

were entertained in Berlin, German journalists in London, amid some

mutual execration and dislike. A _rapprochement_ took place

between ourselves and Russia, for it was quite the fashion in Europe

to fraternise with Russia, her armies were so huge, even if not,

apparently, very good at what armies should be good at. There were

those in this country who held that it was not quite nice to fraternise

with Russia, disapproving of her governmental system, and of the

Tsar’s very natural suppression of the Duma that had for a few days

and by an oversight so strangely existed and actually dared to demand

constitutional reform. There were those in Great Britain who said that

we should not be at all friendly with a government so little liberal

in mentality. But, after all, you must take nations as you find them,

and their domestic affairs are quite their own concern, and one should

not be provincial in one’s judgments, but should make friends even with

the mammon of unrighteousness for the sake of the peace of Europe,

which was a good deal talked of just then by the Powers, though it is

doubtful whether any of them really believed in it. It is certain that

the nations by no means neglected the steady increase and building

up of armaments by land and sea. They hurried away from the Hague

Conference to lay down new battleships at a reckless pace; even Mr. W.

T. Stead said, “Let us strengthen our navy, for on its fighting power

the peace of Europe depends.” Strengthen our navy we did; but as to the

peace of Europe, that lovely, insubstantial wraith, she was perhaps

frightened by all those armoured ships, all those noisy guns, all those

fluent statesmen talking, for she never put on much flesh and bones.

20

1907

Outside politics, 1907 was a gay year enough. There was a severe

outbreak of pageantitis, which many people enjoyed very much, and

others found vastly disagreeable. Drama was noticeably good; the

Vedrenne-Barker company moved from the Court to the Savoy, and the

intelligent play-goer moved after it. Miss Horniman’s Repertory Theatre

toured the provinces; and the Abbey Theatre players took English

audiences by storm. Acting was good, literature and the arts were much

encouraged, dancing and social entertainments were more than ever the

fashion. Society, it was said, was getting rowdier. For that matter,

society has always been getting rowdier, since the dawn of time. How

rowdy it will end, in what nameless orgies it will be found at the Last

Day, is a solemn thought indeed.

As to the young they were thought of and written of much as ever, much

as now. The New Young were discovered afresh, and the Edwardian variety

was much like the Victorian and the Georgian. They were wild, people

said; they went their own way; they were hard, reckless, independent,

enquiring, impatient of control, and yet rather noble.

“Youth in the new century has broken with tradition,” people said. “It

is no longer willing to accept forms and formulæ only on account of

their age. It has set out on a voyage of enquiry, and, finding some

things which are doubtful, others which are insufficient, is searching

for forms of experience more in harmony with the realities of life and

of knowledge....”

Youth was, in fact, at it again.

“Girls are so wild in these days,” Vicky cheerfully complained. “Nancy

and Imogen both go on in a way we’d _never_ have dared to do.

Nancy dances all night (of course chaperons are a back number now),

and comes home alone, or with some wild, arty young men and women,

or, worse still, with one wild, arty young man, at five o’clock in

the morning, and lets herself in with a bang and a rush, and often

lets the arty young people in too. No, Nancy, I say to her, you don’t

let your friends into my house before breakfast, and that’s that. Not

several of them at once, nor one by herself or himself. If they don’t

want to go home to their own beds, they must just go and carouse in any

hotel that will receive them, for in my house they shall _not_

carouse. _Nor_ sit on the dining-room sofa and smoke, and carry

on conversations in tones that I suppose you all think are hushed.

It shall not be done, I said, so that is settled. But is it settled?

Not a bit of it. Nancy merely changes the subject, and Charles and I

are woken by the hushed voices again next morning. Edwardian manners,

people tell me; well, I’m Victorian, and I don’t care if it _is_

1907.”

“You were doing much the same in 1880, my dear,” Rome interpolated.

“Oh, well, I’ve forgotten ... were we?... Well, anyhow, you can’t say

I was behaving like Imogen. She doesn’t care for dancing much, and

she’s such a baby still that cocktails make her tipsy and cigarettes

sick; she prefers raspberry syrup and chocolate cigars, which is really

more indecent at her age. At her age _I_ was thinking of proper

young-ladyish things, like young men, and getting engaged; but Imogen

seems never to have heard of either--I mean, not of young men in

their proper uses. She plays childish games, and dashes about on her

bicycle, and makes ridiculous lists of all the ships in the navy and

how much they weigh and how many horses they’re equal to, and slips

off to Portsmouth all by herself to see them launched, without a word

to anyone, and of course makes herself ill. I said to her one day, I

suppose you’ll go and marry into the navy some day, Jennie; nothing

else will satisfy you. But she opened her eyes and said, _Marry_

the navy? Oh, no. I couldn’t do that. I should be too jealous of him.

You see, I want to be in the navy myself, and I know I should hate his

being in it when I couldn’t. It would only rub it in. I want to do nice

things myself, not to marry people who do them. I believe, mother, I’m

perhaps too selfish to marry; it’s _my_ life I want to enjoy, not

anyone else’s. Besides, there might be babies, and they would get so

in the way, little sillies. They wouldn’t get in your way, I told her

(only of course it isn’t true, because they always do, the wretches),

if only you’d behave like other grown girls, and not be forever

climbing about and playing silly games. You’re such a baby yourself,

that’s what’s the matter. What on earth the child’s book will be like

that she’s so busy with I can’t imagine. _She_ knows nothing about

life, bless her. There’s Phyllis married, and running her home so

capably, and Nancy at least carrying on like a girl, not like a child

in the nursery--but Imogen! I lose my patience with her sometimes.”

And even as her mother spoke, Imogen was in Hamley’s in Regent Street,

looking at toy pistols and blushing. She was blushing because she had

just been deceitful, and was afraid that the lady attending on her

guessed. “For what aged child is it?” this helpful lady had asked.

“Would caps or blank cartridges be what he’d want? I mean, if he’s

_very_ young....”

“Oh, no,” Imogen mumbled, “he’s not awfully young. Blank cartridges, he

likes....”

She bent her abashed face over the weapons, fingering them. A sordid

fib; was she seen through? She chose her pistol quickly, paid for it,

and hurried out of the shop. When she got well away, she extracted the

weapon from its cardboard box and tucked it, with a guilty look round,

into the side pocket of her skirt.

She strode along with a new reckless gallantry.

“Patrick slipped among the crowd; that queer, cosmopolitan, rather

sinister crowd that is to be found around the Marseilles docks. Was he

followed? His hand strayed to his hip pocket. His keen, veiled eyes

took in the passers-by without seeming to look. If he could get through

the next hour without mishap, he would be aboard and a-sail. But could

he? Prob’ly not....”

While Imogen thus walked in foreign ports or trackless forests, a

happy, dreaming spinster, a reckless adventurer armed to the teeth,

many of her contemporaries and elders walked in suffragist processions,

adventurers too, and no less absorbed than she. Stanley, disgusted now

by the increasingly reasonless methods of the militants, had definitely

turned her back on them and joined the constitutionals. These arranged

orderly and lady-like processions, headed at times by Lady Carlisle.

“There can be no doubt,” wrote the more dignified press, after one

such procession, “that many of these lady suffragettes are absolutely

in earnest, and honestly believe that the cause for which they are

contending is a just and sane one. But the fact remains that they

are in the minority; that the sex, _qua_ sex, is still content,

and proud to be content, to accept the symbol of petticoat....”

(“How indecent,” cried Vicky, “to gossip about our underwear in a

leader by a man!”) ... “the symbol of petticoat as the badge of

disenfranchisement.” Women, the article continued, are of low mental

calibre, and will never understand politics, and if they did it would

interfere with their only duty, the propagation of the race.

“I love journalists,” said Rome, reading this to her papa at their

Sunday breakfast. “They always write as if women did that job

single-handed. They are so modest about man’s share in it, which is

really quite as important as ours. They even kindly call us the fount

of life. Dear, generous, self-effacing creatures....”

But papa was shaking his head, gravely.

“You make a joke of it, my dear. But this low mental equipment on the

part of the writers on our leading papers is really a tragedy. The

guiders of public opinion.... The blind leading the blind ... how can

we avoid the ditch?”

“Indeed, we don’t avoid the ditch. We are all in it, up to the neck.

But if one is to be sad on account of the low mental equipment of

writers or others, there will be very little joy left. For my part, I

find a considerable part of my joy in it; it assists in providing the

cheering spectacle of human absurdity.”

“Pass me the paper, my dear. I want to read about.... I want to see it.”

Rome smiled behind the screen of paper which papa put up between him

and her. Well she knew what papa wanted to read in it. He was looking

for news of Mr. R. J. Campbell and his New Theology, searching for

tidings of Pantheism and the Divine Immanence. And, sure enough, he

found them. There was a Saying of the Week. Among the eminent persons

who had said other things, such as Dr. Clifford, who had remarked,

a little meiosistically, “It is not necessary to burn a man who is

seeking the truth,” and the Lord Chief Justice, who had observed, more

topically, “One of the greatest errors that motorists can make is to

believe that upon their blowing their horns everybody should clear out

of the way,” and Prince Fushimi from Japan, who had said, “I do not

wish to object to ‘The Mikado,’ as I am sure its writers did not intend

to hurt the feelings of a great nation, but I shall, of course, be

glad if it is not performed,” and two doctors, one of whom had said,

“Kissing consists in depositing some saliva on the lips or cheeks of

another person,” and the other, “Those who do not like milk will get

cancer”--among all these utterers of truth came Mr. R. J. Campbell,

remarking brightly, not for the first time nor for the last, “The New

Theology is the gospel of the humanity of God and of the divinity of

man.”

“True,” said papa, within himself. “Very true. Very proper and

intelligent indeed.”

He sighed gently behind the newspaper. He had had, of late, his doubts

as to Higher Thought; as to whether it was very intelligent, very

proper, or very true. It was strange in so many ways; high, doubtless,

but perhaps for earth too high. And there were strange tales going

about concerning the Gurus who led in prayer and in thought. And the

leg of that unfortunate young man ... how could people believe such

nonsense? The element of folly in all human creeds was becoming, in

the case of the Higher Thought, painfully evident to papa.

This New Theology now--this young man Campbell--he seemed, somehow,

nearer to solid earth than did the Higher Thinkers. He might talk of

the Divinity of Man, but he did not, as papa, having read his book on

the subject, knew, mean anything silly by it, only what all the mystics

have meant--the divine spark in the human heart. As to the humanity

of God--well, he probably meant no harm by that either. He was but an

anthropomorphist, like the rest of us.

The theologians had been hard upon that book of his. It was not, of

course, the book of a scholar; all it said had been said much better

by Loisy and other Catholic modernists, whom Mr. Campbell palely

reflected. But it gave a good peptonised version, suitable for the

unscholarly mind. And its reviewers had been unkind. They had nearly

all attacked it. Dr. Robertson Nicoll in the _British Weekly_ had

snubbed it at considerable length. The _Church Times_ had said,

“The book is one long offence against good taste,” and the _Methodist

Recorder_, “Frankly, we do not think this book worth reading, and

to price it at six shillings is enough to make us join in the Book

War.” Theological reviewers were not always fair, as papa, since he had

published his own mighty and erudite work on Comparative Religions, had

known. For himself, he had liked Mr. Campbell’s book, even though it

was rather bright than scholarly, more an appeal to the man in the City

Temple than to the student or the theologian. Papa, besides being a

student and a theologian, had of late been also on Sundays a man in the

City Temple. He had said nothing of it yet to anyone; he was trying it.

He liked it; there was nothing in it to bewilder or offend. The Divine

Immanence; call it Pantheism who chose, it was a beautiful idea. It was

in no degree incompatible with the Divine Transcendence; why should it

be, since there was also the Divine Ubiquity?

Brooding on these matters, papa finished breakfast somewhat silently,

and lit his pipe.

“A beautiful day,” said Rome, smoking her cigarette at the open window.

“I shall be out for lunch and tea, papa. I am joining a party of

pleasure; we are going to explore, in our cars, to Newlands Corner,

where we shall have trials of skill and of speed. You won’t come with

me, I suppose?”

“No, thank you, dear, I think not. I’m too old for trials of skill and

speed; too old, even, for exploring.”

Precisely, thought Rome, glancing at him with her indulgent smile, what

papa was not and never would be. He would very surely go exploring this

morning, searching the riches of the spiritual kingdoms. Much more

exciting than Newlands Corner.... To papa at seventy-seven, as to Mr.

R. J. Campbell at whatever age he might be, theology could still seem

new. Rome wondered whether it was an advantage or a misfortune that

to her, at forty-eight, all theologies, as most other of the world’s

businesses, seemed so very old. The only things that seemed new to her

in 1907 were taximeter cabs.

“Well, good-bye, dear, and good luck,” Rome wished her papa.

Of 1907 there is not very much more to record. Two or three items of

news may perhaps be mentioned. Maurice’s son Roger, aged twenty-four,

now attached, at his own urgent desire, to the literary side of

his father’s paper--(“He can’t do much harm there, I suppose,”

Maurice said, “though he’ll not do any good either; he hasn’t the

brains.”)--published a novel. It was a long novel, and it was about

a youth not unlike what Roger conceived himself to be, only his home

was different, for his father was a church-warden and bare the bag in

church, and bullied and beat and prayed over his children; fathers in

fiction must be like this, not heretical and intelligent journalists.

The book conducted the youth from the nursery through his private and

public schools (house matches, school politics, vice, expulsions,

and so on), through Cambridge (the Union, the river, tobacconists’

assistants, tripos), to journalistic, social and literary London, where

it left him, at twenty-four, having just published his first novel,

which was a great success.

“God, what tripe,” Maurice commented, but to himself, as he turned the

pages. “Exactly what the boy _would_ write, I fear. No better,

no worse. Well, poor lad, he’s pleased with it enough. And it will

probably be handsomely reviewed. It’s the stuff to give the public all

right.” His thoughts strayed to a familiar, rather bitter point. If he

had been given (by Amy: how fantastic a thought!) a son with brains; a

son with a hard, clear head or an original imagination; a son who, if

he wrote at all, wouldn’t produce the stuff to give the public, a son

who, like himself, would see the public damned first....

Roger was, as his father had predicted, handsomely reviewed, for the

Edwardians rather liked the biography-of-a-young-man type of novel, and

loved details of school life. Roger had his feet well on the ladder of

successful fiction-writing. Roger would be all right. Meanwhile, his

head swelled even larger than before. His father perceived that the

innocent youth really believed his reviewers, and conceived himself to

be a writer and a clever young man.

The other items I record of the year 1907 I quote from the diary of

Imogen for the 16th of March.

“_Indomitable_ launched, Glasgow. Largest and quickest cruiser in

the world. 17,250 tons. 41,000 h.p. 25 knots. _Invincible_ and

_Inflexible_, same type, building. Finished book, began to type

it. Got guinea prize from _Saturday Westminster_ for poem.”

21

WHITHER?

And so to the last years of Edwardianism. In them that gay, eager,

cultivated period listed gently to the political left. The Socialist

Budget, as it was called by its opponents, “the end of all things” as

Lord Rosebery a little optimistically called it, agitated the country.

Old Age Pensions were at last established, to the disgust of Tories,

who had, however, when members of Parliament, to be careful how they

expressed their disgust, for fear of their needy constituents. “Whither

are we drifting?” enquired the Conservative press, in anger and fear.

“Here is Socialism unabashed: the thin end of the wedge which shall at

last undermine the integrity and liberty of our Constitution.” Here

were sixty millions a year, not insurance but a free dole, squandered

on supporting old persons who might just as well be supported in

workhouses. What would that come to in Dreadnoughts? Anyhow, we had

got to lay down six or seven Dreadnoughts a year for the present, if

we were to be to Germany in the ratio of two keels to one, which was

assuredly essential. “They are ringing their bells; they will soon

be wringing their hands,” said the Tory leaders. The Radical element

in the government strengthened; Sir Henry Campbell Bannerman died,

and in Mr. Asquith’s ministry Mr. Lloyd George was Chancellor of

the Exchequer. But it remained, on the whole, a Liberal-Imperialist

government, and left most of the radicalism to Labour, whose

parliamentary strength was increasing and unifying. Wherever we were

drifting, it was not towards extreme radicalism.

As to Ireland, a bill was passed to reduce her docks, thistles and

noxious weeds: no other bill.

Parliamentary affairs and party politics were no more exciting and no

more tedious (for that is impossible) than usual. Of more interest

were the first flying machines that really flew, the drawings of Mr.

Augustus John exhibited at the New English Art Club and condemned by

all critics (except the few who liked the kind of thing), as essays

in a savage and childish archaism, and deliberate insults to our

intelligence; (whither indeed was art drifting, when such drawings

could be praised?); and the establishment of the White City at

Shepherds Bush, with the Franco-British Exhibition (sadly dull) and

flip-flaps, switchbacks, wiggle-woggles and scenic railways (most

exciting, and an insidious snare for pocket money; you could get rid

there in one evening of the careful hoardings of weeks; also, if you

were as weak in the stomach as Imogen, you felt repentant after a few

goes). Thither President Fallières, on a visit to King Edward, was

taken, to enjoy the Franco-British Exhibition and cement the _entente

cordiale_, which, however, needed it less then than now, for the

Edwardians were on the whole most enthusiastic about this international

understanding. “There is no longer a Channel,” they said, publicly and

politely; but in their hearts, for they were no more foolish than we,

they still gave thanks for this useful, if unpleasing, strip of sea.

To forge faster the other link in the Triple Entente, that only

possible guarantee for a world peace, King Edward visited the Tsar of

all the Russias, at Reval. So there we were, grasping these two great

military powers by the hand, ready to face any emergency. We had got

ahead of Germany in this matter of Russia. For all the European Powers,

discreetly averting their eyes from the chronic blood stains on the

bear’s savage claws, were courting her for her legions. To have the

bear at their beck and call--that was what everyone wanted, against the

emergencies which might arise. And never was a time when emergencies

seemed more imminent, more dangerous, more frequent; such a state of

simmering unrest was Europe’s in the days of Edward the Peacemaker. Of

the Kaiser Wilhelm and his Uncle Bertie it has been said that their

relations “lapsed into comparative calm only when they were apart from

one another.” Their subjects hated and feared each other; the press in

each country stirred up terror of invasion by the other; “the German

invasion,” “the English invasion”--these phrases were bandied about in

two jealous, frightened empires. The German spy scare, the British spy

scare, these fevers were worked up in the jingo press of two countries.

“You English are mad, mad, mad,” said Wilhelm. “I strive without

ceasing to improve relations and you retort that I am your arch-enemy.

You make it very hard for me.”

For that matter, nations always make it hard for one another; it is

their function. We did make it hard for Germany, and Germany made it

hard for us, and France made it hard for everyone.

Anyhow, here was the Triple Entente, full-armed, to meet the Triple

Alliance, and some one or other would see to it that they did meet

before long.

The chief European emergency which arose at the moment was an attack of

megalomania on the part of Servia, in 1909. The Serbs had the madness

to dream of a greater Servia, which should unite the scattered peoples

of their race--“a dream,” said the English press, “as hopeless as that

of Poland _rediviva_. Greater Servia either will be realised under

the sceptre of the Hapsburgs, or will not be realised at all.” The

awkwardness of the situation, so far as we were concerned, was that

Russia was, as usual, backing her mad little militant friend, and had

to be dissuaded with great tact from upsetting the apple cart. However,

a joint note to Servia from the Powers quieted her for the time being,

and the lid was shut down temporarily on the seething European kettle

of fish.

Other intriguing matters of this year were the building, in British

dockyards, of three huge battleships for Brazil, which disgusted

others than young Imogen Carrington; the Olympic Games in July; the

publication of various not unamusing books; and the deaths of two old

men, Algernon Swinburne and George Meredith. Our two greatest Grand

Old Men had departed from us, and no more would pilgrims alight at the

Pines, Putney, or go exploring to Box Hill. The office of our literary

G. O. M. was filled now only by Mr. Thomas Hardy, for Mr. Henry James

was still an American. Sometimes one speculates, aghast, what would

happen should we ever be left with no candidates for that honourable

post--that is to say, with no celebrated literary man or woman (for

there might, though improbably, be a G. O. W. some day) over seventy

years, no Master for the younger writers to greet on the festival of

his birth. It would be an undignified state of affairs indeed; and one

need not anticipate it at present, for behind Mr. Hardy there looms

more than one candidate of respectable claims.

The closing years of this reign were brightened further by Commander

Peary and Dr. Cook, who both maintained that they had discovered the

North Pole. It was ultimately decided that only the Commander had

done so, as the doctor had had the misfortune to mislay his papers

in Greenland; but his was a sporting venture, and deserving of all

applause, and he had a good run for his money.

And so an end to Edwardianism. The new Georgianism dawned on a nervous,

gay, absorbed nation, experimenting in new but cautious legislation,

alive, on the whole, to new literature and new art, alive wholly to

whatever enjoyment it could find, and thoroughly tied up in continental

politics, so that when that mine was fired we should go up with it

sky-high.

Told by an idiot · 第 5 / 6 章