CHAPTER VII.

{GEORGE III. 1776–1777}

Affairs of Ireland..... Debates on America, &c.

Prorogation of Parliament..... Sentiments of Foreign Powers,

&c. Evacuation of Boston by the British..... Mission of

Indian Chiefs..... Affairs of Canada..... Unsuccessful

Attack on Sullivan’s Island..... Affairs in Virginia.....

Declaration of Independence by Congress..... Expedition

against New York..... Defeat of the Americans on Long

Island..... Conference on Staten Island..... Capture of New

York..... Capture of Fort Washington..... Capture of Fort

Lee, and Retreat of Washington..... Expedition against Rhode

Island..... Successes of General Carleton..... Measures of

Congress..... Defection of the Colonists, &c. Meeting

of Parliament..... Debates on America..... Attempt to fire

His Majesty’s Dock-yard at Portsmouth.

AFFAIRS OF IRELAND.

After the Christinas recess, the first important measure of parliament

related to Ireland. Addresses from America had been sent to the people

of that country, and they soon produced their intended effects among

them; especially among the people of Dublin, and the Protestant

dissenters. This was first seen in the acts of the sheriffs and

common-council of that city. After voting thanks to Lord Howard, on his

resignation, and to those peers who had supported the constitution, and,

in opposition to a weak and wicked administration, protested against the

American restraining acts in imitation of the city of London, they sent

over a strong petition and remonstrance to the king. This was opposed by

the lord mayor and aldermen, and the common-council then resolved that

whoever refused to consent to a dutiful petition, tending to undeceive

the king, and by which the effusion of one drop of blood of the subjects

of Great Britain might be prevented, was an enemy to the constitution.

The Irish parliament was not behindhand with the common-council in

exhibiting sympathy for the cause of the Americans. Soon after it

assembled, which was on the 10th of October, the members rejected a

money-bill transmitted from England, upon the plea that it had been

altered in council. On the 23rd of November, still more unequivocal

symptoms of a refractory spirit appeared in the Irish parliament. Lord

Harcourt, the lord-lieutenant, having proposed to the commons to send

out of the kingdom 4000 men, for the American service, and accept

in their stead an equal number of foreign Protestant troops, to be

maintained at the expense of the British crown, they reluctantly

conceded to the first proposition, and absolutely refused to admit the

foreign substitutes.

These embarrassing matters were brought before the English parliament.

On the 15th of February, Mr. Thomas Townshend moved for a committee of

inquiry, on the allegation that the lord-lieutenant had made an offer

of the public money without consulting the British house of commons, and

had thereby been guilty of a breach of privilege. Ministers were in

a dilemma. Taken by surprise no two of them agreed in their modes of

defence, or took the same ground in warding off the attack. Thus while

one asserted that the Irish speaker had misunderstood the viceroy’s

message, which only meant that his majesty would pay the 4000

foreigners, another contended that when the Irish establishment was

increased, the king had engaged to pay 12,000 troops in that country,

except in case of invasion or rebellion in England, and that the present

demand not being within these exceptions, his majesty should, therefore,

be absolved from his promise. But whatever ground ministers took it was

clear that they or the viceroy of Ireland had been at fault, and had

not Lord Harcourt been popular both with “the king’s friends” and the

opposition, it is probable that he would have been censured by the

house. The motion was, however, quashed by a large majority, and another

motion on the same subject was equally unavailing.

DEBATES ON AMERICA, ETC.

On the 20th of February, Mr. Fox made a motion for a committee to

inquire into the causes of the ill-success of our arms in North America,

and the defection of the Canadians. In a speech of considerable power,

Fox maintained that the ultimate design of government was to overthrow

the constitution. He chiefly confined himself to an inquiry whether the

proceedings of ministers had produced the desired effects. To this end

he pursued a detail of ministerial operations beginning with the Boston

Port Bill, in the course of which he endeavoured to show that folly

existed in the cabinet, and that their plans were conceived in ignorance

and executed in imbecility. At the same time he inveighed against the

disgraceful servility of parliament, and concluded by remarking that

none would object to inquiry but those who were culpable themselves.

Unable to resist his reasoning, ministers attempted to elude it, but

their arguments rather weakened than strengthened their cause. Lord

North, indeed, candidly admitted that some of his plans had miscarried;

arguing, in extenuation of their failure, that it was impossible to

foresee every event. He concluded by saying that he was ready to resign,

whenever the house should withdraw its confidence. There was no danger,

however, of this extremity; for, though excited by the speech of the

mover, several friends of government joined in calling for an inquiry,

the motion was negatived by a majority of two hundred and forty against

one hundred and four.

On the 29th of February, copies of treaties lately-entered into with

the Landgrave of Hesse-Cassel, the Duke of Brunswick, and the Hereditary

Prince of Hesse Darmstadt, for the hire of troops, to the amount of

about 17,000 men, for the American service, were laid before the house

of commons. Lord North moved to refer these compacts to a committee; on

doing which he dilated on the fairness of the terms, and dwelt on the

advantages of employing foreign troops. By the opposition, however,

Great Britain was represented as disgraced in the sight of all Europe,

by applying to the petty states of Germany for succours against her own

subjects. They complained also, that the troops had been obtained at an

immoderately high price; £7 10s. levy-money being paid for every man.

The princes, likewise, it was said, who let them out like slaves, or

beasts of draught, were to be subsidised besides; the Landgrave of

Hesse-Cassel, who furnished 13,000 men, being guaranteed £10,281 per

annum, and the Hereditary Prince of Hesse, who furnished 688 men, £6000

annually. Moreover, it was objected that the King of England had ensured

the dominions of these princes against foreign attacks, while their

troops were employed in America. Finally, the opposition argued that it

was injudicious and dangerous to hire men who had nothing to do with the

quarrel in question. Lord Irnham, in opposing ministers, made a good use

of the weapons of ridicule. He remarked:—“I shall say little as to the

feelings of those princes who can sell their subjects for such purposes.

We have read of the humourist Sancho’s wish,—‘that, if he were a

prince, all his subjects should be blackamoors, as he could, by the sale

of them, easily turn them into ready money;’ but that wish, however it

may appear ridiculous and unbecoming a sovereign, is much more innocent

than a prince’s availing himself of his vassals for the purpose of

sacrificing them in such destructive war, where he has the additional

crime of making them destroy much better and nobler beings than

themselves.” Other members maintained that these German soldiers,

on arriving in America, would be induced to accept lands from the

colonists, join the banner of independence, and fight against the

monarch who purchased their services. But argument was of no avail: the

question for referring the treaties to a committee was carried by two

hundred and forty-two to eighty-eight, and subsequently for agreeing to

the report by one hundred and twenty to forty-eight. One amendment was

carried on the motion of Colonel Barrè, namely, for an address to his

majesty to equip the German troops with British manufactures.

In the house of lords the whole strength of the opposition was arrayed

against the treaties. The Duke of Richmond moved an address not only

to countermand all foreign troops, but to forego hostilities. His grace

observed, in his speech, that ever since the year 1702, the German

princes had been rising in their demands; that the present bargain was

harder than any former one; and that the cost of the mercenaries

engaged would not be less than one million and a half annually. He then

animadverted on the large proportion of officers employed, and pointed

out the danger of keeping so many foreigners under their own generals.

He took occasion, also, to speak again of the unseen, overruling

influence which had for so many years pervaded all our councils, though

it was manifest to all that this influence proceeded from the king

himself. After a long and animated speech, the Duke of Richmond was

followed by other noble lords who enforced his sentiments. It was stated

that neither Marlborough’s campaign of 1704, which saved the German

empire, nor the campaign by which the Earl of Chatham had obtained

Canada, had cost so much money as that of Boston during the last year.

It was also urged that the nation was incapable of bearing new taxes or

of supporting the war in America; and that, if to the American war were

added a rupture with France and Spain, and the whole house of Bourbon,

the ruin of England was inevitable. The population of America was

likewise pompously displayed, and the termination of all connexion

between England and her colonies predicted. On their part ministers

supported their measures by tracing the history of the colonies, and

exhibiting their uniform disposition to factious resistance. Lord

Temple, who had again differed with his brother-in-law the Earl of

Chatham, strongly reprobated the intemperance of the opposition.

He remarked:—“The next easterly wind will convey to America every

expression used in this debate; and I would not that the nakedness

and weakness of my country should stand confirmed by the sanction and

authority of such testimony. It is time to act, and not to talk; for

the die is cast, the sword is drawn, and the scabbard thrown away. Past

experience certainly will not justify confidence in ministers; but I

would not, by declaring our utter inability to reduce the colonists,

furnish a golden bridge for an ignominious, ruinous, and disgraceful

peace. I have heard the war called unjust: but who in this house have a

right to call it so? Not those who voted for the Declaratory Act: those

only who denied our right of taxation; and how very few were they! I

cannot approve of recalling troops, and publishing the terms to which

you will yield, until there is reasonable assurance of their not being

rejected. When the happy moment for conciliation shall arrive, I hope

ministers will seize it: I wish them success: at least at such a crisis

I will not hang on the wheels of government, rendering that which

already is but too difficult more impracticable.” Upon a division, the

Duke of Richmond’s motion was negatived by one hundred to thirty-two;

but the proposed address was entered on the journals, with the names of

ten peers protesting against its rejection.

Despite this “vast and invincible majority,” as it was called by Burke,

on the 14th of March the Duke of Grafton moved for an address beseeching

his majesty that a proclamation might be issued, declaring that if the

revolted colonies, within a reasonable time, before or after the

arrival of the troops in America, should present a petition to the

commander-in-chief, or to the commissioners appointed under the late

act, setting forth what they considered to be their just rights and real

grievances, hostilities should be suspended, and the said petition be

referred to parliament for consideration. In making this motion, the

Duke of Grafton asserted that both France and Spain were arming, and

that two French gentlemen had already been to America, and had had

conferences with Washington and with congress. These assertions,

however, were treated by ministers as chimerical, and Lord Weymouth,

secretary for foreign affairs, assured the house that there never was a

time when Great Britain had less to fear from foreign powers, and that

every courier brought assurances of the pacific intentions and friendly

feelings from all the courts of Europe. After a long debate, in which

old arguments were reiterated on both sides of the house, the duke’s

motion was negatived, by a majority of ninety-one against thirty-one.

About a fortnight after this Mr. Hartley presented the form of another

address in the commons, which was conceived in a better spirit, but it

shared the same fate as that of the Duke of Grafton. On the 10th of May

Mr. Sawbridge, who had succeeded Wilkes as lord mayor, made a similar

motion, for placing the Americans in the same situation as the Irish.

During the debates on this motion, Mr. Temple Luttrel, a younger brother

of the colonel, uttered very violent language; declaring that the

king’s speech was a sanguinary parole, and the ministry an infernal

administration: quoting the well-known observation of the philosopher

Thales; “that of all wild beasts, the worst was a tyrant, and of all

tame ones, a flatterer.” The motion was negatived, as was also a motion

subsequently made by General Conway, for inspecting the powers vested in

his majesty’s commissioners proceeding to America.

PROROGATION OF PARLIAMENT.

On the 23rd of May, at the moment when his majesty was expected in the

house of lords to prorogue parliament, Mr. Hartley moved in the commons,

an address, praying that parliament might not be prorogued, but continue

sitting by adjournments during the summer, in order that they might be

ready to receive information concerning the proceedings in America,

and to provide for contingencies. This motion was, however, negatived

without a division, and soon after the commons were summoned to the

upper house for the purpose of prorogation. In his speech the king said

that no alteration had taken place, or was likely to take place, in his

relations with foreign courts. He represented the country as engaged

in a great national cause, attended with great difficulty and with much

expense. As, however, the essential rights and interests of the empire

were deeply concerned in the issue of it, and could have no safety or

security but in that constitutional subordination for which they

were contending, he felt convinced, he said, that no price would be

considered too high in order to obtain the wished-for objects. He still

hoped his rebellious subjects might be awakened to a sense of their

errors, and make a voluntary submission; but if not, he trusted to

effect this object by a full exertion of the forces with which he had

been entrusted by parliament.

SENTIMENTS OF FOREIGN POWERS, ETC.

Notwithstanding the declarations of the secretary of state for foreign

affairs, and likewise of his majesty, that there was nothing to fear

from foreign powers, it is evident that at this very period there was

much to fear from those quarters. France and Spain both smarted under

the disgrace of the late wars, and burned for revenge, whence there was

every reason to apprehend that the armaments they were preparing, under

various pretences, would ultimately be employed against England. Then

again, Frederic of Prussia entertained strong feelings of resentment

against us, for the manner in which he had been treated during the late

war, and the Czarina of Russia had absolutely refused her promised aid.

Moreover the naval superiority of Great Britain had excited the envy of

almost every other state; and they longed to see it diminished. It does

not appear, indeed, that any foreign potentate looked with an approving

or an unjaundiced eye upon the part taken by Britain, except the

Emperor of Austria, and as this part was in strict accordance with the

monarchical principles of the Austrian court, his aid might fairly be

expected. These well-known sentiments of foreign powers had doubtless

the effect of stimulating the Americans in their factious opposition to

their mother country, and England ought to have been warned by them. But

England itself was like a divided house upon this subject. The Americans

in fact were more encouraged by the people of England in their rebellion

than by the hostile sentiments of foreign powers. Recent pages fully

prove that they had their advocates in parliament,—men who not only

justified their proceedings, but likewise exhibited to them in their

speeches “the nakedness of the land,” in strange, unjustifiable, and

hyperbolical language. Like the false spies among the Hebrews, they

spread an evil report of their country’s resources, and hence held it

forth to the contempt of the colonists. In this they were also aided by

the political writers of the day. The press teemed with publications in

favour of the colonists, and every breeze wafted them across the mighty

waters to add fuel to the flames. One of the most conspicuous of these

writers was Dr. Price, whose work entitled, “Observations on the Nature

of Civil Liberty, &c.;” sought to depreciate the British government, and

extolled the spirit which gave rise to the American revolution. Powerful

pens, as that of Dr. Johnson, were, it is true, employed on the other

side of the question,—but sentiments in accordance with the feelings

of an individual or a whole people will ever maintain a preponderating

influence. Moreover, it must be confessed that those writers who took

the part of government often wrote in an illiberal and unenlightened

spirit, so that their emanations had an equally powerful effect in

confirming the Americans in their views and designs, as those which

proceeded from the pens of their advocates. From every party, in

truth, and on every hand, the colonists received encouragement in their

hostility to the British crown.

EVACUATION OF BOSTON BY THE BRITISH.

While the British parliament was indulging in oratorical debate, and

political writers were dipping their pens in gall, the Americans had

been actively engaged with the sword. During the winter, both the

British army in Boston, and the blockading army of the Americans, by

which that town was surrounded, had undergone many miseries. Washington,

however, was active in keeping up the flagging spirits of his

troops, and they were further revived by the constant arrival of

provision-waggons, ammunition, artillery, and reinforcements. At length

Washington was induced to commence offensive operations. Ploughed Hill,

Cobble Hill, and Lechemeres Point were successively occupied during

the month of December, and the approaches of the American troops were

carried within half-a-mile of the British works on Bunker’s Hill.

Congress recommended an immediate assault upon Boston; but Washington

asked for more time, to complete his approaches and make his

preparations. This was allowed him, and in the month of January a

council of war was held in the camp—some of the members of congress

being present—when it was resolved, that the British troops should be

attacked before any reinforcements should arrive. At the same time it

was resolved that thirteen regiments of militia should be required from

Massachusets and the neighbouring colonies, that the attempt might be

made with good prospect of success. These regiments were supplied early

in February, but Washington was compelled to forego an immediate attack

from the state of the weather. It was then exceedingly mild, and he

wanted ice to enable him to pass the river. But this was not long

wanting. About the middle of February the cold became intense, and the

ice was sufficiently strong to bear the troops. Still the attack was

delayed. Another council of war was held, and it was unanimously’

resolved, that the attempt was too hazardous. Soon after, however,

Washington received intelligence that a part of the British troops in

the town was expected at New York, and from various appearances among

them he conceived that there was an intention of evacuating Boston.

He now resolved to commence the attack. On the 2nd of March he began a

heavy bombardment and cannonade on the town and on the British lines,

which was continued for two days. On the night of the 4th of March

Washington took a more decisive step. The heights of Dorchester

commanded the shipping in the harbour and nearly the whole town, and yet

Lord Howe had taken no more care to occupy this hill than General

Gage had taken to occupy Bunker’s Hill. In the midst of the roar of

artillery, therefore, Washington dispatched General Thomas, with

2000 troops and 300 labourers, to take possession of the heights of

Dorchester; and at the break of day the British beheld the hill occupied

and strongly fortified. They had scarcely recovered from their surprise

when Thomas began to cannonade the town and the ships of war, his

labourers still working with ardour, in order to render his position

still more formidable. General Howe saw that he must either dislodge

Thomas, or evacuate Boston, and he sent Lord Percy with 3000 men to

effect his dislodgement. Percy embarked in transports, and fell down to

the castle in order to proceed up the river to a low strip of land at

the foot of Dorchester Hill; but a storm arose, and he was compelled to

return to the harbour. It was providential for the British troops

that this storm arose; for the heights of Dorchester are almost

perpendicular, and the force was hence insufficient to accomplish

the enterprise. And the task was soon rendered more difficult. While

Washington still kept up a terrible fire, more men were sent to the

heights; and Thomas, on the advice of Colonel Mifflin, chained together

a number of hogsheads filled with sand and stones, which were to be

rolled down the hill, should General Howe renew the attempt, upon his

advancing columns. The British commander, however, became sensible of

the madness of such an attempt, and resolved to evacuate the town. An

intimation was sent to Washington that Boston would be spared from the

flames if the troops were suffered to embark without molestation. This

notice determined Washington to refrain from hostilities, and in ten

days, on the 17th of March, the British troops quitted the cradle of

the revolution, and set sail for Halifax, in Nova Scotia. Before they

departed the British troops destroyed Castle William, but they

left their barracks uninjured, with a large quantity of cannon and

ammunition, of which Washington was in want. This was a great blunder;

for if they could not have been carried away they should have been

destroyed. And this was not the only blunder committed. In sailing

away, Howe left no cruizer in Boston Bay to warn the ships expected from

England that the place was not in our possession; and a few days after,

when Washington had taken up his quarters in the town, several of our

store-ships sailed into the harbour, and fell into the hands of the

Americans, before they discovered that Boston was lost to King George.

Howe’s negligence was even still more disastrous in its consequences

than this; for Lieutenant-colonel Archibald Campbell sailed into the

harbour with seven hundred fresh troops from England, and he was taken,

and became the subject for severe and brutal retaliation. The loyalists

who remained in Boston became also the objects of vengeance; they

were tried as the betrayers of their country, and their effects were

confiscated, while the very estates of the emigrants were seized, and

passed into the hands of the victors. It was a proud triumph for the

Americans. Congress, elated by it, passed a vote of thanks to Washington

and his army for their acquisition of Boston, and directed a gold medal

to be struck in commemoration of the event.

{GEORGE III. 1776–1777}

MISSION OF INDIAN CHIEFS.

Untutored as the savage is, many a lesson may be gathered from his lips

and his conduct. Before Boston was evacuated by the British troops, the

Oneidas and some other Indian tribes had sent to the provincial

assembly a deputation of their chiefs, on a mission which displayed

much practical humanity and good feeling. The purport of this mission

is disclosed in the address of these chiefs to the assembly. It reads

thus:—“Brothers, we have heard of the unhappy differences and great

contention between you and Old England. We wonder greatly and are

troubled in our minds. Brothers, possess your minds in peace respecting

us Indians. We cannot intermeddle in this dispute between brethren:

the quarrel seems to us so unnatural; and we bear an equal affection to

both. Should the great king apply to us for aid we shall deny him: if

the colonies apply we shall refuse. We Indians cannot find or recollect,

in the traditions of our ancestors, a case similar to this. Brothers, if

it were an alien that had struck you we should look into the matter. We

hope, through the wise government and good pleasure of the Great Spirit,

your distresses may be soon removed, and the dark clouds dispersed.

Brothers, as we have declared for peace, we desire you will not apply to

our Indian brethren for assistance. Let us Indians be all of one mind,

and you white people settle the disputes between yourselves.” But

notwithstanding this wise policy of these Indian chiefs, many of the

savage tribes bordering on the great lakes and rivers were induced by

British agents to wield the tomahawk in behalf of “the great king,”

and committed ravages which brought a stain upon the fair fame of Great

Britain.

AFFAIRS OF CANADA.

At the close of the session of the British parliament good news had

arrived from Canada. Congress had voted nine regiments for service in

that colony, and General Schuyler was ordered to prepare a number of

batteaux to transport these troops down the lakes and the Sorel to

the scene of action. At this juncture news arrived of the death of

Montgomery, and the critical situation of Arnold. This news urged

congress to renewed exertions. They did all they could to hasten their

reinforcements, and called upon the provincial conventions to collect

all the money they could for the use of the army in Canada. Men and

specie were, however, not easily procured; and, moreover, had the

troops been ready on the instant, they could not have marched during the

winter, as the ground was covered with snow, and the lakes all frozen

over. On the opening of spring, however, by the 1st of April, the force

in Canada was raised to 1,800 men. But coined money was not forthcoming

for their use, and Arnold issued a proclamation, making the paper-money

of congress current, under promise of redeeming it with specie in four

months, and threatening all who refused this paper in exchange for their

commodities or labour with destruction. The French Canadians had no

faith in the paper-money, or in the promises of Arnold, and the troops,

therefore, were under the necessity of helping themselves to what they

wanted. This was fatal to the American cause in Canada. The Canadians

were told that the troops were come to liberate them from tyranny and

oppression, but they concluded that they had only come to plunder

them. Added to this, the New Englanders laughed at the Catholic church

ceremonies, and insulted some of the priests, whence they insured

universal hatred and vengeance. The situation of Arnold was a critical

one, and it was rendered more so by the appearance of the small-pox

among his troops, which greatly thinned his ranks. Still Arnold resolved

to persevere. He again set up his battery before the walls of Quebec,

hoping to take it before it should be relieved by reinforcements from

England. Before, however, he could make any impression, General Wooster

arrived as his superior in command; and, taking offence, he retired to

Montreal, there to assume a separate command. Many of the Americans also

left the army and returned home, under the pretence that the period of

their engagement was expired. General Thomas arrived on the 1st of

May, and the force then amounted to 2000 men. Had these troops been

effective, and had the magazines been well stored, Thomas might have had

some chance of success, but such was not the case; and to complete his

dilemma, the river St. Lawrence began to open below, and intelligence

arrived that English ships of war were daily expected. Thomas therefore

resolved to make a precipitate retreat, and he began to remove the sick

to the Three Rivers, and to embark his artillery and stores in boats and

canoes. Before these operations were completed, however, three English

ships which had forced their way through the ice arrived before Quebec,

and these vessels instantly threw on shore two companies of the 29th

regiment, with some marines and sailors. Struck with consternation,

the Americans began to fly in all directions, and General Carleton then

sallied out in pursuit of them. Notwithstanding, the enemy retreated

so precipitately that Carleton could do nothing more than capture their

artillery and stores, about a hundred fugitives, and nearly all their

sick, who had been left behind. Many, however, were afterwards found

concealed and starving in the woods; and Carleton, as humane as he was

brave, treated the whole of the prisoners with great humanity. The

rest of the troops crossed the St. Lawrence, and formed at the forts of

Chamblée and St. John, on the Sorel, where General Thomas died of the

small-pox.

Thus successful, General Carleton dispatched Captain Forster to a strong

fort, called the Cedars, situate thirty miles west of Montreal, and

which was garrisoned by four hundred Americans. This fort surrendered,

on condition that the garrison should be preserved from the ferocity of

the Indians. In the attack on this fort one Indian, on the side of the

English, was slain, and this excited the passions of the red men to

revenge. On the day after the surrender of the Cedars Forster heard

that a party of the enemy were marching from another point to secure the

fort, and he ordered one hundred Indians to place themselves in ambush

on both sides of the road in a wood through which the enemy must

pass. This stratagem was completely successful. All the Americans were

captured, and when the Indians had brought them to the front of the fort

they prepared to put them to death, in atonement for the blood of their

tribe which had been shed. This was an ancient custom, and it was with

difficulty that Captain Forster induced them to dispense with it: it

was only effected by conciliating them with presents. From the Cedars,

Forster proceeded to Vaudreuil, about six miles northward. Arnold made

an attempt to dislodge him, but was obliged to retreat, and return to

St. Anne’s, on the island of Montreal. Being encumbered with prisoners,

Forster judged it expedient to release them; Arnold promising to

return an equal number of royal troops within two months. This compact,

however, was shamefully violated by congress, under pretence that

Forster had treated the prisoners taken at the Cedars in a barbarous

manner—a pretence which was utterly unfounded. In the meantime General

Carleton being reinforced by more troops from England, repaired to

Three Rivers, about midway between Quebec and Montreal. Imagining that

Carleton had only sent a detachment, General Sullivan, who had succeeded

to the command of the troops on the death of Thomas, ordered General

Thomson and Colonel St. Clair to cross the St. Lawrence, and to make a

night attack on the forces of the English. These two officers did not

arrive at Three Rivers till the day dawned, and as soon as they were

seen the alarm was given all along the bank, and a fire was opened

upon them from some ships. They landed from their boats, and in their

confusion ran into a broad morass, where they were attacked in front by

General Fraser, and in their rear by General Nesbit; while Major Grant

took possession of a bridge, which rendered their escape over the river

Des Loups impracticable. Many were killed and wounded, and General

Thompson, with Colonel Irvine, and about two hundred men, were taken

prisoners. The rest fell back in disorder across a bog into a wood on

their left, and on the next day crossed the bridge which Major Grant had

occupied, and which was by some mistake now left unguarded, whence they

reached their boats, and escaped to their main body at Sorel. General

Carleton embarked the mass of his forces and pursued them by water;

but when he arrived at Sorel he found that place evacuated, and the

batteries dismantled. General Burgoyne, who had arrived with the last

reinforcements from England, was charged with the pursuit of Sullivan,

while Carleton himself recrossed the St. Lawrence to look after Arnold.

That officer, however, glad to make his escape from Canada, embarked his

men, crossed over the river at Long Isle, and joined Sullivan at

Fort St. John, on the Sorel. The two American generals did not deem

themselves safe at this fort, and they therefore set fire to it, as well

as that of Chamblée, and continued their retreat up the river. They

were followed by Burgoyne; but when that general reached the head of the

Sorel, and saw the lake beyond it well supplied with armed vessels,

he desisted from the pursuit, and rejoined General Carleton. By these

events, Canada was entirely freed from the American arms; and General

Carleton commenced preparations for the recovery of Ticonderoga, and the

dominion of the lakes Champlain and St. George, now held by the enemy.

The American generals, Sullivan and Arnold, threw themselves upon the

isle Aux Noix, where they were secure from the enemy, but where many of

their men perished of fever.

UNSUCCESSFUL ATTACK ON SULLIVAN’S ISLAND.

While success attended the British arms in Canada, an expedition sent

against the southern states totally failed. Governor Martin had been

strenuously exerting himself to recover his lost province of North

Carolina, by means of a body of Highlanders, who had recently emigrated

to America, and another body of resolute men, called “Regulators,”

who lived principally by the chase. These two bodies were commanded by

Colonels Mac Donald and Mac Leod. They were embodied at Cross Creek, but

having attempted to open their way to Wilmington, where they expected

some regular troops were to be landed, they were circumvented by

a superior insurgent force, and beaten. Mac Leod, with most of his

Highland followers, were slain, and Mac Donald, with some of the

“Regulators,” were taken prisoners; while the rest fled, and returned to

their old hunter life in the back country. The attempt which was made by

Governor Martin, indeed, seems altogether to have been premature; but he

appears to have been induced to make it from the delay of the arrival of

General Clinton and his troops, who were destined for this service.

No second attempt could be made to erect the royal standard in the

Carolinas, till Clinton arrived from England, and then it was found to

be too late. He reached Cape Fear in the month of May, and immediately

took the command of some troops which had previously been conveyed to

those coasts by Sir Robert Parker. The general’s instructions were to

endeavour, by proclamations and other means, to induce the Carolinas

to return to their allegiance; to gain information as to the temper

and disposition of those provinces; and if he found the royalists

sufficiently numerous to take up arms, to leave a part of his

forces with them, and then to repair to New York to meet the

commander-in-chief, General Howe. Clinton found no encouragement, and

met with no signs of co-operation; and he, together with Parker, tired

of doing nothing, resolved to go beyond their commission, by capturing

or destroying Charleston, the capital of South Carolina, the trade of

which town supplied the two colonies with the nerve of war. To this

end they sailed from Cape Fear on the 4th of June, and arriving off

Charleston they took possession of Long Island, where there were many

royalists, but who had previously been disarmed. Near Charleston,

however, and covering-its harbour, was another island, called Sullivan’s

Island, in which there were armed insurgents and formidable batteries.

There was a projecting point of land, also, called Hadrell’s Point,

which almost touched this island, and on which General Lee, an

Englishman, and rival of Washington, in the American service, was posted

with a large force of regular troops and militiamen, and some artillery.

Notwithstanding these formidable appearances, however, Clinton

persevered in his design of taking this island. He constructed two

batteries on Long Island, answering to those of the enemy, and to

co-operate with the floating-batteries destined to cover the landing

of the troops. The event was most disastrous. On the 28th of June the

fleet, under Parker, anchored in front of the American fort, and opened

a tremendous fire upon it; while Clinton seconded the efforts of the

admiral by firing from the batteries on Long Island. In the midst of

the roar of cannon the troops embarked in the rear of some floating

batteries in boats and some small craft; but they had scarcely left

the beach when they were ordered to return to their encampment on Long

Island. Meanwhile the ships continued their firing upon the fort, which

was responded to with equal vigour by the Americans. The roar of cannon

ceased not till long after night-fall, and then the British fleet

exhibited a sad and desolating spectacle; for while the fire of the

ships made but comparatively little impression upon the fort, the

fire from the fort did fearful execution upon the fleet. The following

description of this day of carnage is from the pen of Burke. He

says:—“Whilst the continued thunder from the ships seemed sufficient

to shake the firmness of the bravest enemy, and daunt the courage of

the most veteran soldier, the return made by the fort could not fail

of calling for the respect as well as of highly incommoding the British

seamen. In the midst of that dreadful roar of artillery, they stuck with

the greatest constancy and firmness to their guns; fired deliberately

and slowly, and took a cool and effective aim. The ships suffered

accordingly: they were torn to pieces, and the slaughter was dreadful.

Never did British valour shine more conspicuous, nor never did our

marine, in an engagement of the same nature with any foreign enemy,

experience as rude an encounter. The springs of the Bristol’s cable

being cut by the shot, she lay for some time exposed in such a manner as

to be most dreadfully raked. The brave Captain Morris, after receiving a

number of wounds, which would have sufficiently justified a gallant man

in retiring from his station, still, with a noble obstinacy, disdained

to quit his duty, until his arm, being at length shot off, he was

carried away in a condition which did not afford a possibility of

recovery. It is said, that the quarter-deck of the Bristol was at one

time cleared of every person but the commodore, who stood alone, a

spectacle of intrepidity and firmness, which has seldom been equalled,

never exceeded.” When the firing ceased the Bristol and Experiment,

ships of fifty guns each, were left almost wrecks upon the water,

but the frigates had not suffered so severely. It was expected by the

Americans that most of them would be unable to pass the bar; but,

with the exception of the Actæon frigate, which got aground at the

commencement of the action, all dropped down with the tide beyond the

reach of the guns in the fort. It is clear that Admiral Parker did all

that could have been done to effect his object, but skill and valour

were of no avail. The fortress was built of palmetto-wood, and therefore

it was little damaged; the shot which struck it being buried in its soft

materials. Then again, the bombs that were thrown into the fort were

instantly swallowed up in a morass that was constructed in the middle,

and therefore failed in their design. While the English ships, indeed,

were swept of their men, the loss of the garrison did not exceed ten men

killed and about twenty wounded. The Americans themselves accounted for

their victory by the strength of the fort; the care they had taken

to secure its approaches; the courage and skill displayed by Colonel

Moultrie, who commanded in the fort; and the presence of Lee on the

projecting point opposite the island. On the other hand, the English

attributed their defeat to the non-co-operation of the army, which

appears to have been declined by Parker, he having full confidence in

the powers of the fleet. But whatever may have been the cause of the

result, it is certain that by the repluse of this armament the southern

states obtained a long respite from the horrors of war, and that it had

the effect of raising the depressed spirits of the colonists: by it the

spell which had long attached itself to the British navy was broken.

After the disaster General Clinton set sail in the Solby frigate with

his troops to join General Howe, but the rest of the ships remained at

Long Island to refit.

AFFAIRS IN VIRGINIA.

During these events Lord Dunmore had been making a last effort to

retrieve the king’s affairs in Virginia. With the consent of General

Howe he sent Mr. Connelly, a native of Pennsylvania, to induce the

people in the back and inland parts of the colony, together with several

of the Indian tribes, to take up arms for government. Connelly had

already reached the back-settlements, but soon after his arrival he was

recognized by a tradesman to whom he was known, who denounced him to one

of the nearest revolutionary committees. Connelly was seized with all

his papers, and sent to Philadelphia, where he was put in irons and

treated with the utmost severity. The scheme of Lord Dunmore was

developed by his papers, and the whole was in consequence frustrated.

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE BY CONGRESS.

It required no prophetic eye to foresee that at no very distant period,

notwithstanding the sentiments of loyalty expressed in their papers by

congress, they would, nevertheless, take one vast stride in the march of

revolution and proclaim their independence. As early as the 15th of

May the congress, in their sitting at Philadelphia, resolved:—“That it

should be recommended to all the various assemblies and conventions in

the United States of America, where no form of government adequate to

the exigencies of affairs had yet been adopted, to establish such a

constitution as should be most conducive to the public welfare and

security.” This resolution was published in the newspapers, with a

preamble, stating that as the king and parliament of Great Britain had

excluded the inhabitants of the colonies from the protection of their

mother country, it behoved them to abolish the power and constitution

which had been derived from thence. By this measure of congress the

mask was at length thrown off, and many Americans now stepped forward

to claim the honour of having been the originator of the grand idea.

The glory is, however, generally attributed by Americans to Benjamin

Franklin;—the man who, while in England, strove with all his might, and

in the depth of guile, to make the Earl of Chatham, and all the great

orators of opposition, believe that the wish was furthest from his

thought;—that he earnestly desired to preserve the connexion of the

colonies with his “dear old mother country.” While at the same time,

however, that American writers attribute the origin of the grand idea to

Benjamin Franklin, they admit that it was the pen of an English writer

that rendered the most effective service in this particular—a pen

that was wielded by the infidel, Thomas Paine! Originally a Quaker and

stay-maker in Norfolk, Paine first made himself known as a political

writer by the publication of a pamphlet. This pamphlet recommended

him to the notice of Franklin, who advised the poor author to try

his fortune in America, now affording a wide field for the talents of

adventurers. Paine accordingly settled at Philadelphia in 1774, where

he became first a contributor to newspapers and periodicals, and then

editor of the “Philadelphia Magazine.” By this time the public mind had

been prepared by various productions issued from the press, to entertain

thoughts of independence. Paine turned his wit to this subject, and in

1776 he brought out his famous pamphlet, called “Common Sense,” which

contained bolder sentiments than any written by all the other various

pamphleteers. His production met with unparalleled success. Copies were

distributed throughout the colonies, and “Common Sense” became literally

the study of the whole American world. It was even read, admired, and

eulogised in England by men of sense and talent: Burke calls it

“that celebrated pamphlet which prepared the minds of the people for

independence.” Its chief merit, however, seems to have consisted

in rough, sarcastic wit, which was well calculated to flatter the

prejudices as well as to inflame the resentment of the American people.

The effects it produced were wonderful. Multitudes were brought over by

it to the cause of independence, who but a few months before would have

regarded the proposition with abhorrence. As for the writer he at once

gained by it the topmost pinnacle of the temple of popularity. The

legislature of Pennsylvania voted him £500; the university of the same

province conferred on him the degree of Master of Arts; he was elected

member of the American Philosophical Society, founded by Franklin; and

he was subsequently made clerk to the committee of foreign affairs,

while he was consulted by all members of government and congress as an

oracle.

The recommendation of congress to the various assemblies and conventions

in the United States of America met with all due attention, and many

prepared for the organization of a new government. Thus the convention

of New York appointed a committee to take the resolution into

consideration, and on the 27th of May this committee presented a report,

replete with democratic principle, and going the whole length which

the recommendation involved. The men of the hot south, however, the

Virginians, went to work in a less roundabout manner than those of the

other states. The convention of that colony, which met at Williamsburg

on the 6th of May, instructed their delegates at congress to propose to

that body an immediate declaration of independence. Accordingly, on the

7th of June, Richard Henry Lee, one of their delegates, moved that the

congress should forthwith declare:—“That these united colonies are,

and of right ought to be, free and independent states; that they

are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all

political connexion between them and the state of Great Britain is and

ought to be totally dissolved; and that measures should immediately

be taken for procuring the assistance of foreign powers, and a

confederation be formed for binding the colonies more closely together.”

Vehement debates followed this proposition, its principal supporter

being John Adams, and its chief opposer John Dickenson. On the question

being put, six delegates voted in the affirmative, and an equal number

in the negative; the delegates from Pennsylvania being equally divided.

The debate, therefore, was resumed on the following day, when Dickenson

relinquished his opposition, and by his vote decided the contest.

Congress now assumed the title of “Representatives of the United

States of America,” and on the 4th of July they published a definite

declaration, or act of independence. This declaration was drawn up

by Jefferson, and slightly altered first by Franklin and Adams, and

afterwards by the whole committee to whom it was submitted. As passed by

congress it commenced with asserting that all men were originally

equal, and that all people have an unalienable right to choose their own

government. It then set forth that the history of the present King of

Great Britain had been a history of injuries and usurpations, having

for their direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over

America. The sins of the monarch—for it was against the king himself

that congress chiefly aimed their blows—were set forth in eighteen

separate clauses, and it must be confessed that if the monarch was so

great a sinner as he was represented to be in these clauses, then the

summing up of the act of independence was justifiable. This summing up

declared,—“That a prince marked by every act which may define a tyrant,

is unfit to be the ruler of a free people: consequently, congress,

in the name and by the authority of the good people of America,

had solemnly published and declared that the colonies were free and

independent states, absolved from allegiance to the British crown; that

all political connexion between them and Great Britain was broken;

and they, as free and independent states, had full power to levy war,

conclude peace, contract alliances, and establish commerce.” But though

the people of England were not calumniated by congress in such bold

and unwarrantable language as their monarch, they nevertheless were

condemned by the act of independence. A clause in it with reference

to the British people, reads thus:—“Nor have we been wanting in

attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to

time of attempts made by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable

jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of an

emigration and settlement here; we have appealed to their native justice

and magnanimity; and we have conjured them by the ties of our common

kindred to disavow those usurpations which interrupted our connexion

and correspondence. But they have been deaf to the voice of justice

and consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity which

pronounces our separation, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind,

enemies in war, in peace, friends. We, therefore, the representatives of

the United States of America, in general congress assembled, appealing

to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentional

do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these

colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are,

and of right ought to be, free and independent states; that they

are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all

political connexion between them and the state of Great Britain is and

ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states,

they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances,

establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which

independent states may of right do. And for the support of this

declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine

Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes,

and our sacred honour.”

This declaration went forth to the world as the unanimous act of

congress and of the whole American people. Nevertheless, several

delegates, among whom was Mr. Dickenson, refused to sign the paper, and

it is well known that there were many among the American people, and men

of great influence and talent, who dissented from the act. Washington

himself conceived that congress was going too far, although he still

continued at the head of their army to fight their battles. But there

was now no alternative but to fight or be considered a renegade. The

great body of the nation was in favour of the measure of congress,

and were prepared to stand by its consequences. And in this they were

encouraged by the inherent power which they possessed; by the physical

advantages which their country presented; and by the difficulties which

Great Britain, split into factions, and with a divided parliament,

must encounter in carrying on a war in such a far distant country. The

Americans also appear to have been encouraged, even at this early stage

of their rebellion, by foreign powers. It is an indisputable fact,

indeed, that their sole reliance was not upon “native swords and native

ranks.” Secret agents had been sent to America from powers clandestinely

inimical to the British nation; and American agents had been sent

secretly to the courts of Paris, Madrid, Naples, the Hague, and St.

Petersburgh. The Americans, moreover, drew encouragement from the hope

that there might be a rebellion in Ireland, if not in England itself. To

ensure such a consummation in Ireland, they even sent addresses to the

Irish people which were well calculated to lead to it. How artfully

these addresses were worded may be seen from the following extract of

one, in which the Americans expressed their regret that they had been

compelled to include Ireland with Great Britain in their non-importation

agreements. It states:—“Your parliament had done us no wrong. You had

ever been friendly to the rights of mankind, and we acknowledge with

pleasure and gratitude that your nation has produced patriots who have

nobly distinguished themselves in the cause of humanity and America. On

the other hand we were not ignorant that the labour and manufactures of

Ireland, like those of the silkworm, were of little moment to herself,

but served only to give luxury to those who neither toil nor spin. We

perceived that if we continued our commerce with you, our agreement not

to import from Britain must be fruitless. Compelled to behold

thousands of our countrymen imprisoned; and men, women, and children in

promiscuous and unmerited misery—when we found all faith at an end,

and sacred treaties turned into tricks of state—when we perceived our

friends and kinsmen massacred, our habitations plundered, our houses

in flames, and their once happy inhabitants fed only by the hand of

charity—who can blame us for endeavouring to restrain the progress of

the desolation? Who can censure us for repelling the barbarous band?

Who in such circumstances would not obey the great, the universal, the

divine law of self-preservation? Though vilified as wanting spirit, we

are determined to behave like men; though insulted and abused, we wish

for reconciliation; though defamed as seditious, we are ready to obey

the laws: and though charged with rebellion, we will cheerfully bleed

in defence of our sovereign in a righteous cause. What more can we

say? What more can we offer? We know that you are not without your

grievances. We sympathize with you in your distress, and are pleased to

find that the design of subjugating us has persuaded the administration

to dispense to Ireland some vagrant rays of ministerial sunshine. Even

the tender mercies of government have long been cruel towards you. In

the fat pastures of Ireland many hungry parricides have fed and grown

strong to labour in her destruction. We hope the patient abiding of the

meek may not always be forgotten.” The Americans could scarcely have

spoken plainer than this, and the Irish people could not fail rightly to

interpret their language as an incitement to join in that sin which the

sacred penman has likened to the sin of witchcraft—rebellion.

{GEORGE III. 1776–1777}

EXPEDITION AGAINST NEW YORK.

It has been seen that when General Howe evacuated Boston he set sail for

Halifax. He remained at Halifax till the 11th of June, when he sailed

for New York, and arrived near the end of the month offf Sandy Hook. He

expected to meet his brother, Lord Howe, with the main body of the fleet

and the new army, together with Sir Peter Parker with his squadron, and

General Clinton with his troops. These parties, however, were still far

away, and he therefore landed at Staten Island, where he was joined by

Mr. Tryon, the expelled governor of New York, and a body of loyalists

who had taken refuge with him in an armed vessel. Shortly after he was

joined by his brother, Admiral Lord Howe, and subsequently by Sir Peter

Parker and his squadron, when their united forces amounted to nearly

30,000 men, British and foreign.

Anterior to this, and as early as the month of April, General Washington

had left Boston for New York, and at this moment his army were throwing

up strong entrenchments at that city and on Long Island, to close the

river Hudson against the English fleet. The main body of his forces were

with Washington at New York; General Sullivan, with a strong force, was

at the western extremity of Long Island, just opposite the city; while

the rest of the forces mainly occupied different posts on York Island.

The total number of Washington’s army appears to have exceeded 30,000;

but sickness prevailed in his camp to such an extent that at one time

nearly a fourth part of his forces were unfit for action. Added to this

embarrassment, many of the inhabitants were disaffected to the American

cause, and even a part of his own guards entered into a conspiracy

to seize his person, and deliver him to the enemy. This conspiracy,

however, was discovered, and several engaged in it were executed, and

Washington, thus relieved from danger, earnestly pressed forward the

defences of the city. He had with him a large train of artillery and an

abundant supply of military stores.

Before proceeding to extremities, Lord Howe sent ashore by a flag,

circular letters, acquainting the Americans with his powers, both civil

and military, and enclosing a declaration granting pardons to all such

as were willing to return to their duty; promising that any colony,

town, post, or place that submitted instantly should be exempted from

the provisions of the acts of parliament prohibiting their trade, etc.;

and giving assurances that the meritorious services of all persons who

should aid and assist in restoring tranquillity would be duly rewarded.

Washington forwarded these papers to congress, by whom they were

published in the newspapers, with a comment calculated to destroy their

effects. At the same time Lord Howe opened a direct communication with

Washington; but that general taking offence at the letter being simply

directed to “George Washington, Esq.,” raised a cavil on that ground,

to prevent a conference which would have been embarrassing to him at so

critical a period. It was in vain that Adjutant-general Paterson, the

bearer of the letter, protested that no disrespect was intended, and

that Lord Howe and his brother, the general, could not depart from the

rules laid down for them: Washington rejected the letter, and refused

to let it lie on his table, which refusal was highly approved of by

congress. As a last resource, the British admiral entered into a

correspondence on the subject with Dr. Franklin, with whom he had been

on intimate terms in England; but the first letter which his lordship

received from that philosopher convinced him of the inutility of any

further efforts at negociation, and he prepared for the decision of the

sword.

{GEORGE III. 1776–1777}

DEFEAT OF THE AMERICANS ON LONG ISLAND.

Having at length been joined by Clinton and by nearly all the forces he

expected, General Howe, on the morning of the 22nd of August, commenced

operations. He first threw forward a division of 4000 men under

Clinton, who landed in Gravesend Bay, Long Island, without opposition;

their disembarkation being covered by three frigates and two bombs.

This division was soon followed by the rest of the British army and the

artillery; and upon their landing, Sullivan’s advanced guard set fire

to all the houses and granaries and fled to the woody heights, through

which the English must pass. Washington had previously reinforced the

army of Sullivan, and calculating that Long Island must be held, he

threw over more reinforcements from New York, until the mass of his army

was concentrated on that spot. By his direction, the Americans to the

number of 15,000 were posted on a peninsula towards that end of the

island which faces the city of New York, and is not more than a mile

from it. They were commanded by Generals Sullivan, Putnam, and Lord

Stirling, and their object was to occupy these heights, and to defend

the defiles which led through the hills against the English. A severe

contest ensued; but the British right, under Sir Henry Clinton, having

outflanked the left of the enemy, while the Hessians, under General De

Heister, vigorously attacked the centre, the Americans were routed. Lord

Stirling, who commanded the right wing, finding that the English had

penetrated to the rear, gave orders for a retreat, and to secure it,

boldly attacked the division under Lord Cornwallis; but being assailed

in his course by General Grant, he was repulsed and taken prisoner. The

dispersed troops fled to the fortified lines and camp at Brooklyn; but

they left 2000 slain on the field, or drowned in a morass into which

they were driven at Gowan’s Cove; and about half that number, with

Generals Sullivan and Udell, with ten other field-officers were taken

prisoners. The loss of the British was comparatively trifling: seventy

were slain and about 200 wounded. The ardour of the British troops was

such that they followed the fugitives almost to the foot of their works,

and they were with difficulty prevented from making an assault on their

lines. Had they been permitted it seems clear that they might have

easily carried them; but General Howe, conceiving that the lines must

become his by regular approaches without much sacrifice of life, he

ordered them back to a hollow out of the reach of the fire of the enemy.

By this order the troops which had fled were saved. Washington, who had

passed over from New York during the battle, in the midst of his extreme

anguish at the fate of so many of his troops and the critical situation

of the remainder, suddenly saw a gleam of hope bursting through the

surrounding gloom. On that night the British army encamped in front of

the American lines, and on the following morning the British general

commenced his regular approaches; breaking ground about six hundred

yards from one of the redoubts. But while the troops were digging their

trenches on one side, Washington was smuggling his forces out on the

other, and ferrying them over East River to the city of New York. His

masterly retreat was effected by night in such order, secrecy, and

silence that the English were not aware of it till the rising sun showed

them that the enemy was out of the reach of danger: But for this the

half of Washington’s army which he had exposed on Long Island would have

been lost, and the war might have been virtually ended. But even after

his escape Washington found himself in no very enviable position. A

superior and victorious force was in front of him, while all around him

the country was hostile to his cause. The success of the British arms

indeed, caused the anti-revolutionists to lift up their heads on every

hand, and in great numbers.

CONFERENCE ON STATEN ISLAND.

Almost immediately after the victory on Long Island, Lord Howe made

another attempt to open a negociation. General Sullivan was despatched

by him on parole with a verbal message to congress, importing that

though he could not at present treat with them as an authorized body, he

was desirous of conferring with them as private gentlemen at any place

they would appoint. He had, he said, in conjunction with General Howe,

full powers to compromise the dispute between Great Britain and America

on terms mutually honourable and advantageous—that he wished a compact

to be made when as yet no decisive blow was struck and neither party

could allege being compelled to enter into an agreement—that in case

congress were disposed to treat, many things yet unasked might be

granted them—and that, if upon the conference there should arise good

ground for an accommodation, this might lead to an acknowledgment of its

authority, as otherwise the compact could not be settled. Congress was

embarrassed by this message. They felt that the admiral could have no

offers to make which they could accept; and yet if they declined the

conference the people might entertain a different opinion, and they

might incur their vengeance if they refused to hear the message. Under

these circumstances, while in their reply to Lord Howe they remarked

that they could not, as the representatives of the free and independent

States of America, send any of their members to confer with his lordship

in their private characters, they would nevertheless send a committee

of their body to know whether he had any authority to treat with persons

authorised by congress, and to hear such propositions as he might have

to make. The members appointed for this conference were Franklin, Adams,

and Routledge; three of the bitterest enemies of Great Britain.

This trio waited upon his lordship in Staten Island, on the 11th of

September, and they were received with true English politeness and

urbanity. His lordship commenced the conference by stating that though

he could not treat with them as a committee of congress, yet as his

powers enabled him to confer and consult with any private gentlemen of

influence in the colonies, he would be glad, if they thought proper, to

confer with them in such a character. As their business was only to hear

what his lordship had to say, the trio replied, that he might consider

them in what character he pleased, while they would only consider

themselves in the character given them by congress. The admiral then

said that he and his brother, as commissioners, had delegated power to

grant pardons for the past, and that every favour might be expected from

the British crown if the colonists would return to their allegiance. He

also remarked that the king, ministry, and parliament were disposed

to make government easy to them, and that the obnoxious acts would be

revised in order to put an end to their grievances. These offers and

assurances, however, were despised. The committee replied that if he had

nothing else to propose he had come too late: the petitions of congress

had been despised, independence was now proclaimed, and the new

government formed. Lord Howe then simply expressed his regret at the

evils which must be let loose upon the land, and the trio returned to

Philadelphia.

CAPTURE OF NEW YORK, ETC.

After the victory on Long Island, and while the conference was going

forward on Staten Island, General Howe was engaged in slowly enclosing

Washington on all sides. Apprehensive of the consequences, therefore,

the American general resolved to evacuate the city of New York, and

retire on Kingsbridge, where some strong works had been erected. The

British army had already effected a landing on New York Island without

any loss or difficulty, and Washington retired so precipitately that he

had not sufficient time to carry off all his artillery and stores. By

his retreat General Howe not only took possession of New York, but also

the best part of the island. He had scarcely, however, taken possession

of New York when a dreadful fire broke out in several quarters of the

town. Washington had previously proposed to congress that the city should

be burned, rather than left in the hands of the English, which proposal

had been negatived, but notwithstanding incendiaries were employed to

execute the design. On the night of the 20th, therefore, when most of

the citizens and troops were buried in sleep, these desperadoes began

their work, and, despite the exertions of the soldiers and the

citizens, nearly a third part of the city was consumed to ashes. A few

incendiaries fell a sacrifice to the rage of the soldiers, and many

individuals were arrested on suspicion, but no clue was found to

unravel the mystery, though no doubt can exist that the fearful deed was

committed by order of the American general. The act has been applauded

as one emanating from stern patriotism and self-devotion, but it appears

rather to have proceeded from sheer recklessness and bitter hatred to

the English. The New Englanders were not destroying their own houses

and property, but the houses and property of another people, and a rival

colony, regardless of all the fearful consequences resulting from the

act.

On the retirement of Washington to Kingsbridge, the British troops were

put on board the vessels again, with a view of landing at West Chester,

gaining the rear of the enemy’s encampment, and enclosing him on all

sides within his fortresses. Washington perceived the necessity of

counteracting this project, and, immediately decamping with his whole

force, he took up a strong position, and occupied lines and works which

ran right across York Island; the strongest being at Kingsbridge and

Fort Washington. General Howe, with the main body of his army, marched

up York Island, and encamped in face of Washington’s lines, his lines

also extending quite across the island, and being covered on either

flank by the British ships. While thus situate, on the 16th of

September, there was some skirmishing in the plain that lay between

the two camps, in which the Americans lost Colonel Knowlton and Major

Leitch, two of their best officers. The ill-success of the American

general, by this time, seems to have had a great effect upon the

disposition of his troops. Desertions were frequent, and as the time was

approaching when the period of service for which most of the Americans

had engaged would expire, Washington conceived that he should soon be

left without an army. He saw plainly that the boasts of the sons of

liberty, about flying to arms and fighting for their country without

pay or reward, were not to be depended upon; and he wrote to congress,

urging them to offer the troops good pay, in order that they might be

induced to remain in the camp to fight their battles. Congress voted, in

accordance with his recommendation, a bounty of twenty dollars per man,

and small portions of land to every officer and soldier who should serve

during the whole war. This, however, was not deemed sufficient, and

Washington again wrote to congress, asserting, not only that if the

offer were not raised, both officers and soldiers would leave the

service, but that they would universally, as many were already doing,

join the royal army. Congress again acceded to his wishes: they voted

an increase of pay and bounty-money, and offered other advantages,

immediate or prospective, which made it more profitable for them to

remain in the American service, than to join Lord Howe. By this means

Washington’s troops were kept together, and General Howe was therefore,

compelled to exert himself for victory. Having thrown up intrenchments

to defend his own lines, and the approaches to New York, on the 12th of

October he embarked a considerable part of the royal army, and landed

them at Frog’s-neck, about nine miles in the rear of Washington’s

positions. Some of the ships of war went still higher up the North

River, so as to cut off any retreat to the Jerseys. The only road open

to escape, indeed, was one leading to the New England provinces,

and this, it is thought, might have been secured. Washington now

contemplated deciding the fate of America by a pitched battle, and had

it not been for the remonstrances of General Lee, the deserter, who

had come up from Sullivan Island and the Carolinas, he would thus have

acted. A council of war was called, and it was decided that they must

decamp immediately, and get towards the open country, called the White

Plains. In their retreat there was some skirmishing, in which the

British troops were victorious; but on the 22nd of October, Washington

succeeded in gaining the edge of the White Plains, where he put the

main body of his army in a long line of entrenched camps, extending from

twelve to thirteen miles on different heights, and having the deep river

Brunx in his front. In this position he was attacked by the royal army

on the 28th of October: the troops being divided into two columns; the

left, led by Howe, and the right by Clinton. As they advanced towards

the White Plains Clinton’s column fell in with several bodies of the

enemy, and drove them back in great confusion to their lines. It was

observed, as the troops approached the American lines, that they were

strongest on the flanks, and weakest in the centre. Had an assault been

made on the centre, the absolute destruction of the American army would

have been inevitable; but General Howe, neglecting that point, ordered a

strong detachment of the left wing, under General Mac Dougal, to attack

an eminence on which 4000 men were advantageously posted, probably

for the purpose of covering a retreat, if necessary. This detachment

succeeded in their enterprise; but it then became necessary to preserve

the hill which the troops had gallantly taken possession of, and, in

so doing, the left and right wing of our army were, in a great measure,

severed from one another, so that they could not attack the main

position of the Americans. That night the British troops slept on their

arms, and the next day they encamped, with the left wing on one side of

the Brunx, and the right on the other. On the 30th, having received some

reinforcements, Howe made a disposition to attack the enemy’s lines on

the following morning; but during the night it rained in torrents, and

the faces of the hills became, in consequence, so slippery, that the

attack was postponed till the morrow. In the meantime, however, his

intention was betrayed by a deserter, and before the break of day

Washington evacuated the lines, set fire, in his retreat, to all the

houses on White Plains, crossed the Croton River to North Castle, and

took up a strong position, with the Croton stretching along his front,

and having his rear well defended by woods and heights.

CAPTURE OF FORT WASHINGTON.

Perceiving from the nature of the country that he could not force the

American commander to join battle, General Howe now made a retrograde

movement. Washington had left considerable forces at Fort Washington and

King’s Bridge, in the hope that those positions might be secured, even

though he retreated or were beaten. The force in Fort Washington, and in

the extensive entrenchments round it, consisted of 3000 men, under the

command of the gallant Colonel Macgaw. This post was important to the

royal army, as it secured an intercourse with the Jersey shore, and as

in the hands of the enemy it seriously obstructed the navigation of the

North River. General Howe, therefore, resolved to take it, and on the

15th of November, the garrison was summoned to surrender, on pain of

being put to death by the sword. This summons was unheeded, and on

the following morning it was carried by a furious assault; and all the

garrison who were not slain, were taken prisoners. On the side of the

British, also, there was a great loss; eight hundred being either killed

or wounded.

CAPTURE OF FORT LEE, AND RETREAT OF WASHINGTON.

Immediately after this success, Lord Cornwallis crossed the North River,

and drove the Americans from Fort Lee, which was nearly opposite Fort

Washington, and took all their artillery, provision, and stores. This

advance induced the American general to quit his post on the Croton, and

fall back upon the river Delaware. Cornwallis penetrated to the remotest

parts of East and West Jersey, and on the 24th of November, having

received some reinforcements, he marched for Brunswick. He was now

within two or three marches of the Americans, who fled before him in

dismay; but when he arrived at Brunswick he was ordered to halt. He did

not receive orders to advance till the 16th of December, and then it was

too late for him to overtake the enemy. When he arrived at Princetown

in the afternoon of that day, the last of the Americans had cleared out,

and on pursuing them the next morning he reached Trenton only in time to

see Washington’s last boats crossing the river. At that time the forces

of the American general scarcely amounted to 3000 men, for numbers

of them had deserted, and those that remained were chiefly unsteady

militia. Beyond the Delaware, indeed, Washington’s force lost all

appearance of an army; and the men still continued to desert, though

often brought back forcibly to the camp. Lord Cornwallis now desisted

from the pursuit, and put his division into winter-quarters, between the

Delaware and the Hakensack.

EXPEDITION AGAINST RHODE ISLAND.

While Cornwallis had been advancing through the Jerseys, General Clinton

had been sent, together with the squadron of Sir Peter Parker, to Rhode

Island, where an American squadron had been collected under Commodore

Hopkins. This island was taken without any difficulty, and Hopkins

retired up Providence River, where he remained inactive and useless. The

people of Rhode Island, however, were enthusiastic revolutionists, and

it required a considerable force to keep them in awe; whence, during

three years, a great body of men were left in perfect idleness.

SUCCESSES OF GENERAL CARLETON.

It has been seen that the American army which had been driven from

Canada, took refuge on the Isle Aux Noix, and that General Carleton was

preparing to follow up his successes. It required vessels to cope

with the American flotilla, and to command the lakes St. George and

Champlain, near which the Isle Aux Noix was situate, and of these the

general was in want. The frame-work of vessels was, indeed, sent for

from England, but it required time before they could arrive, and still

further time to put them together. Still Carleton did not remain idle.

In the emergency he sent detachments from the king’s ships stationed at

Quebec, with volunteers from the transports, and a corps of artillery,

to fell timber, and to occupy a favourable post on the Lake Champlain.

The keel and floor-timbers, also, of the “Inflexible,” a ship of three

hundred tons, which had been laid down at Quebec, were taken to pieces,

carried over to St. John’s, and laid down again at a corner of the lake,

where a little dock-yard was improvised. Moreover, thirty long-boats,

many large batteaux, and a gondola of thirty tons were carried up to

the spot, partly by land, and partly by being dragged up the shoals and

rapids of the river Sorel. In a few weeks, indeed, General Carleton

had a naval force—such as it was—to sweep the Lakes Champlain and St.

George from end to end. But before these preparations were completed,

the Americans had quitted the Isle Aux Noix, and had traversed the lake

for Crown Point. Congress had voted that General Gates should take

the command of these troops, and that Arnold, the hero of the Canada

expedition, should command the squadron of fifteen vessels which were on

the lake. When his preparations were completed, Carleton lost no time in

seeking this squadron, and on the 11th of October he discovered it in

a strong line across the passage between Isle Vallicour and the western

shore of the lake. A warm but indecisive action ensued, which lasted

till night-fall; but Arnold in the course of the night, though

well watched, escaped from the passage, and attempted to make Fort

Ticonderago. On the following morning his squadron was out of sight, but

before noon the British flotilla got up with it again, and brought it

to action a few leagues below Crown-Point. After a running fight of two

hours, Arnold’s headmost vessels succeeded in reaching Crown-Point, and

the narrow part of the lake beyond that fort; but the “Washington” and

“Jersey” were taken, and all the rest were run on shore, and there

burnt by their crews. Crown-Point was immediately abandoned by the

provincials, who ran for their lives to Ticonderoga. This fort was

deemed too strong to be successfully attacked, at so advanced a season

of the year, and Carleton, having strengthened the British fleet so as

to ensure the command of Lake Champlain, evacuated Crown-Point of

which he had taken possession, and returned to Quebec, where he exerted

himself during the winter in making preparation for the next campaign.

At the same time General Burgoyne returned to England.

MEASURES OF CONGRESS.

Although the confidence of many members of congress, that the contest

would soon be over, was shaken, yet as a body they remained firm and

hopeful. At the same time, on the advance of Lord Cornwallis through

the Jerseys, they fled for safety from Philadelphia to Baltimore, in

Maryland. On reassembling here, however, they betrayed no despondency

or any lack of spirit. The hope of obtaining their grand

object,—independence and separation from Great Britain,—seemed to

sustain them in the midst of all their reverses. They now materially

enlarged the powers of Washington. They authorised him to raise sixteen

additional regiments; furnished him with all the money they could, and

promised him a great deal more; and finally conferred upon him, for six

months, a sort of dictatorship. They further voted a loan of 8,000,000

of dollars; they made more paper-money; they threatened all who would

not receive it in payment for goods or labour; and they adopted all

possible means, by force, intimidation, and enticement, to get money

into the treasury, and to inspire courage into the hearts of the people.

As for their committee of correspondence, they laboured ardently to

induce France and Spain openly to espouse their quarrel, and to threaten

England with an invasion, while the flower of its troops were engaged

in America. It was proposed in congress that their commissioners at

Versailles should be authorised to transfer to France the same monopoly

of their trade which had been possessed by Great Britain. This, however,

was relinquished as a measure which would strike a mortal blow at

some of their leading arguments in favour of independence. It was next

proposed that France should be offered a limited monopoly, and, this

failing, it was suggested that France might be gained over by the offer

of an alliance offensive and defensive. The more prudent among them

represented that if France would venture into the war at all, it would

not be by any treaty, or compact, or promises of congress, but out of

her old rivalry and hatred of England. All the assurances she would

want, they said, was an expression of their determination never again

to submit to the mother country, but to persist in their present course,

though all the world should be merely lookers-on. Resolutions were

printed to this effect, and sent all over the union, and then to the

principal courts of Europe, with agents appointed to impress upon

those courts the sincerity of this declaration, and to solicit their

friendship for the United States. The agents chosen for this mission

were Dr. Franklin, Silas Deane, and Mr. Arthur Lee, and what success

attended their negotiations will soon be seen. Though appealing to the

worst passions, and the most selfish feelings of foreign courts

and cabinets, they were, nevertheless, not only listened to with

complacency, but obtained present aid covertly, and had hopes held out

to them of aid openly hereafter.

DEFECTION OF THE COLONISTS, ETC.

Towards the close of this year, clear proofs were given that the

Americans were not wholly unanimous in the cause of independence. The

inhabitants of the city and island of New York, and of Long Island, and

various other places, presented petitions to Lord Howe, declaring that

they acknowledged the supremacy of Great Britain, and praying to

be received into the king’s peace and protection. On the removal

of congress from Philadelphia to Baltimore, the majority of the

Philadelphians also began openly to declare for the royal cause.

Washington detached troops to that city to quell the anti-revolutionary

spirit, but this did not prevent many of its leading men from going

over to, and corresponding with the commissioners. Moreover, most of the

towns of the Jerseys sent deputations to the king’s commissioners, and

expressed their anxiety for a renewed allegiance to the British Crown.

Possibly this may in part be attributed to the success of the royal

arms, but it is evident that the feelings generally arose from genuine

patriotism. Self-preservation may, also, in part, have dictated this

line of policy, for in one particular the advice of Lord Barrington

had been followed with respect to the Indians, and it had produced its

natural consequences. Our establishments for the management of affairs

with these tribes were withdrawn, and then the red men were left to

act as they pleased; and they had a long account to settle with the

Americans. From the earliest period of their emigration the colonists

had laid it down as a principle that the red men were to be treated

like beasts of prey, and they still hunted them down on every opportune

occasion. Hence, as the Indians were accurate accountants in matters of

blood, and held it as a sacred part of their religion, that they were

bound to avenge the death of their kindred; no sooner were our agents

withdrawn, than the Creek and Cherokee Indians resolved to ravage

the back territories of Virginia and the Carolinas, and to carry, if

possible, both fire and the spear into the heart of these colonies. They

were repulsed by the militia of the colonies, but not before they had

taken a terrible revenge for long-endured wrongs; and the day might not

be far distant when they would return with other tribes to extend their

devastations throughout America.

MEETING OF PARLIAMENT.

The British parliament assembled on the 31st of October. In his opening

speech the king declared that nothing would have given him so much

pleasure as to be able to state that the troubles in America were

terminated, and that the colonists had returned to their duty. He

continued:—“But so daring and desperate is the spirit of their leaders,

whose object has always been dominion and power, that they have now

openly renounced allegiance to the crown, and all political connexion

with this country; they have rejected, with circumstances of indignity

and insult, the means of conciliation held out under the authority

of our commission; and have presumed to set up their rebellious

confederacies for independent states. If their treason be suffered to

take root much mischief must grow from it to the safety of my loyal

colonies, to the commerce of my kingdom, and, indeed, to the present

system of all Europe. One great advantage, however, will be derived from

the object of the rebels being openly avowed and clearly understood;—we

shall have unanimity at home, founded in the general conviction of the

justice and necessity of our measures.” His majesty said that he was

happy to inform them that Canada was recovered, and that the success in

the province of New York had been such as to give the strongest hopes

of the most decisive consequences. He then recapitulated, as usual, the

pacific assurances of European powers, although he must himself have had

some doubts at this time of the sincerity of their professions. It is

manifest, indeed, that signs of a rupture had become evident to

the British cabinet, for his majesty added to this part of his

speech,—“That he indulged the hope that all misunderstanding might

be removed, and Europe continue to enjoy the inestimable blessing of

peace.” He also recommended that England should be put in a respectable

state of defence, and urged upon his “faithful commons,” the necessity

of granting ample supplies for the maintenance of the honour of

his crown, and the vindication of the just rights of parliament. He

concluded thus:—“In this arduous contest I can have no other object but

to promote the true interests of all my subjects. No people ever enjoyed

more happiness, or lived under a milder government than those now

revolted in the provinces: the improvements in every art of which they

boast declare it: their numbers, their wealth, their strength by sea and

land, which they think sufficient to enable them to make head against

the whole power of the mother country, are irrefragable proofs of it. My

desire is to restore them to the blessings of law and liberty,

equally enjoyed by every British subject, which they have fatally and

desperately exchanged for all the calamities of war, and the arbitrary

tyranny of their chiefs.”

{GEORGE III. 1776–1777}

DEBATES ON AMERICA.

Addresses which were, as usual, echoes of the speech, were brought

forward in both houses, and they elicited violent debates. In the

commons Lord John Cavendish moved an amendment of greater length than

even the proposed address. This amendment was seconded by the Marquess

of Granby, and in it, and the debates that ensued, it was affirmed that

the disaffection and revolt of the colonists could not have taken place,

if there had not been great faults committed against them. The faults

pointed out were, chiefly, the rejection of petitions and complaints;

the improper instructions given to commissioners for the purpose

of reconciliation; the endeavours made to break down the spirit and

independence of the colonists, by the many acts of parliament passed

during the recent sessions; and the project of extirpating the Americans

by the sword. All these errors were imputed by the opposition to the

want of information, and the too great confidence in ministers, who

though in duty bound to ascertain the temper and disposition of the

Americans, had totally failed for want of that knowledge. An appeal to

the sword was denounced as a most dangerous precedent, and by a strange

perversity of mind the leaders of the American revolution were described

and especially by Wilkes, as men averse to a change of government,

and as being only driven to extremities by an accumulation of neglect,

insult and injury, and by two years of a savage, piratical, and unjust

war, carried on against them by the English people. Wilkes also,

with others on the same side, took umbrage at the word “treason,”

as applicable to the Americans, asserting that what ministers called

“treason,” the Americans denominated “a just resistance and glorious

revolution.” As for the pacific declarations of foreign powers, and

especially the Bourbons, all reliance on them was exposed with sarcasm

and ridicule. Colonel Barré, indeed, declared that a war of the most

serious nature with France and Spain was impending over the country.

The whole of his majesty’s speech was, in truth, denounced as false,

insidious, hypocritical, and deceptive;—as holding out law and liberty,

indeed, but holding it out at the point of the sword.

The speech and address were defended by Lord North and Lord George

Germaine. Lord North denied the charge which had been alleged against

him of withholding information; declared that he had always communicated

to the house as much as he could divulge with safety; and indignantly

repelled the charge of hypocrisy advanced against that part of the

king’s speech which stated his desire to restore law and liberty to

the colonists. In his own peculiar quiet way, Lord North hinted to the

opposition, that if they were members of the new American legislature,

they could not have ventured to make so free with the president and

majority of congress, as they were now doing with their sovereign, his

ministers, and the majority of the English parliament. In the

defence, Lord George Germaine remarked that we had been anxious for

reconciliation upon mild and fair terms, and that these terms had been

rejected with scorn by the American leaders. According to their own

statements, he said, of the propositions made by Lord Howe, and the

conference that had taken place on Staten Island, his lordship was as

eager for the restoration of peace, as Franklin, Washington, and the

other leaders were for the continuance of hostilities. He then turned to

the statements made by foreign powers, concerning their friendship for

England. These statements of the princes of the House of Bourbon must be

taken as proofs of their pacific intentions, but if they proved false,

and should incur the folly and the guilt of assisting a rebellion,

Great Britain was prepared to meet them in the field. He pertinently

asked:—“Will the Bourbons, blind to their own interests, wish the

spirit of independence to cross the Atlantic? Can they be exempt from

fear, lest their own colonists should catch fire at the doctrine of the

unlimited rights of mankind, and prefer them to slavery and digging

of gold? And will not great danger arise from the vicinity of powerful

states freed from European control?” Finally, it was urged in defence of

the speech and address, that the only question which called for debate,

was simple in its nature it was, only, whether we chose to resign all

the benefits we derived from our colonies, and which had been purchased

by our best blood and treasures, and by truckling to the defiance and

insult hurled at us by the Americans, cut off those sources of power

and opulence, and submit to a degradation from the rank we held in the

political system of Europe; or, whether we should, by the full exertion

of our power, preserve those advantages, assert our ancient supremacy,

restore the authority of the British Parliament, and bring back

our ungrateful subjects to a sense of their duty. A division on the

amendment answered these questions; it was negatived by a majority of

two hundred and forty-two against eighty-seven, and the original address

was therefore carried.

In the upper house, an amendment was moved by the Marquess of

Rockingham, similar to that of Lord John Cavendish, and was followed

by debates of equal violence. By the Earl of Shelburne the speech was

denounced as a tissue of sophisms, and as a composition of unqualified

absurdity, treachery, cruelty, hypocrisy, and deceit. He attempted to

show, indeed, that all its paragraphs were false, differing only in

this—that some of the falsehoods were fallacious, some specious, and

some notorious. The Duke of Richmond maintained that America was lost

for ever, and he thought that we had better sit down quiet and contented

at the loss, consoling ourselves with the reflection that it had been

no fault of our own, but, solely that of an unjust and imbecile

administration. But even Lord Shelburne did not concur in this opinion:

he never meant, he said, this country to give up its right of commercial

control over America, which was the essential bond of connexion between

the two countries; and he declared that as the national debt was truly

and equitably the debt of every individual in the empire, whether

at home, or in Asia, or America, the Americans ought in some way,

to contribute to its discharge. Lord Sandwich, the first lord of the

Admiralty, more warmly opposed the doctrine of quiescence propounded

by the Duke of Richmond. It was, he said, derogatory to the honour and

destructive to the interests of England; and he declared that he would

hazard every drop of blood, and his last shilling, rather than see his

country set at defiance, bullied, and dictated to, by her undutiful

and ungrateful children; her disobedient and rebellious subjects. The

amendment was negatived by a majority of ninety-one against twenty-six.

Fourteen peers had it entered on the journals, at full length, as a

protest signed by themselves.

On the 16th of November, Lord John Cavendish produced a copy of the

proclamation issued by Lord Howe and his brother, as commissioners,

and proposed that, in conformity to its tenor, the house should resolve

itself into a committee for revising the acts by which the colonists

felt themselves aggrieved. This proposition was seconded by Burke, and

many of the opposition harangued in its favour. Ministers, however,

opposed such a step, on the ground that this inquiry into grievances had

been proffered only to those who should return to their duty, and hence

a disavowal of independence, and an acknowledgment of British supremacy

were requisite, before any measures of reconciliation could be adopted

by Great Britain. On a division the motion was lost by a majority of one

hundred and nine against forty-seven.

After the rejection of the proposition of Lord John Cavendish, many

members of opposition, especially those of the Rockingham party, seceded

from the business of parliament, alleging that it was useless to discuss

or oppose ministerial measures. This conduct, however, was blamed by the

majority of the opposition, who contended that no member of parliament

could, consistently with his duty, desert the interests of his country,

merely because he felt that his party would be outvoted. It was agreed

that no one could infer from thence that his attendance would be

useless, and that a respectable minority, though not able to carry

measures of its own, might, nevertheless, modify injurious laws and

counsels, by exposing their pernicious tendency. Some who held these

opinions made efforts to bring the great orator, Chatham, to the charge

again; but his gout prevented him from coming to the house, and little

could be elicited from him beyond a declaration that his sentiments with

regard to America were the same which he had always professed, and

which stood fully explained in his Provisional Act. At the same time he

expressed his fears that, in a few years, France would set her foot on

English ground. Thus, cleared of its members, the house of commons voted

the army and navy estimates without any display of violent opposition.

The number of seamen voted was 45,000, and £3,205,505 were voted for the

expenses of the navy; exclusive of £4000 for the support of Greenwich

Hospital, and £500,000 to go towards the discharge of the debts of

the navy. The army estimates voted, were about £3,000,000 exclusive

of extras, and some new contracts with German princes, for more German

troops to serve in America. These supplies being granted, on the 13th of

December, both houses adjourned for the Christmas recess.

ATTEMPT TO FIRE HIS MAJESTY’S DOCKYARD AT PORTSMOUTH.

During the recess of parliament, the public mind was agitated by acts of

incendiarism, which seemed at one time to denote that a conspiracy

had been entered into for the destruction of both our shipping and our

arsenals. In 1764, Choiseul, the French minister, had concocted a plan

for such a fearful catastrophe, but having divulged it to Grimaldi, then

prime minister of Spain, through him it was discovered to Lord Rochford,

our ambassador at Madrid, and the scheme therefore failed. Ministers

might have taken warning from this circumstance, and have had the

dock-yards and arsenals watched with sufficient vigilance, as to prevent

so disastrous an event from ever taking place. By this time, however,

they had returned to their old confidence, and on the 7th of December,

a fire broke out in the dock-yard at Portsmouth, which threatened its

total destruction. It was got under by great exertions, and it passed

at first for an accident, but on the 15th of January, one of the

under-clerks of the dock-yard having occasion to move some hemp in the

hemp-room, discovered a machine and combustible materials, which had

evidently been placed there by the hands of an incendiary. Some weeks

before, a sullen, silent man, a painter by trade, and who was known by

the name of John the Painter, had been seen loitering about the yard,

and he was now suspected to be the delinquent. Suspicion fastened

still stronger upon him because he was known to have recently come from

America, and a cry of alarm instantly spread through the country that

American incendiaries had arrived in England, and would spread fire and

destruction on every hand. It was necessary that John the Painter should

be taken, and soon after he was identified at Odiam in Hampshire, where

he had been apprehended for a burglary. John was brought up to London

for examination, but he was so taciturn, and so wise in keeping his

own counsels, that neither the privy-council, nor the lords of the

admiralty, nor other officers who interrogated him, could elicit

anything from him that would tend to his crimination. What authority,

however, failed to perform, that craft brought about. On the suggestion

of Earl Temple, another painter, who had been also in America, was put

into the same ward with John, in order to circumvent and entrap him.

Fellow-feeling caused the taciturn prisoner to open his mouth. His

brother painter pretended to sympathise in his misfortunes, descanted

largely on his travels in America, and professed principles similar to

his own. The travelled painter did all this with such address, that he

finally gathered from John that his real name was Aitken; that he had

entered into many regiments from which he had deserted so soon as he had

received the bounty-money; that he had traversed England through nearly

all its parts, sometimes robbing on the highway, and sometimes filching

and stealing in towns while he worked at his trade: that he went to

America, where he commenced politician and reformer of abuses, and where

he conceived the notion of serving the cause of liberty by burning our

shipping and our principal trading cities and towns; that he then left

America for France, where he had several interviews with Silas Deane,

the agent of congress; that Silas Deane encouraged his project, by

giving him money and promising him rewards commensurate with the service

he should render the American cause; that he then procured a French

passport and came over to Canterbury; and that on leaving Canterbury

he proceeded to Portsmouth, where he began to compound and prepare

his combustibles, after which he went into the dock-yard and made the

attempt of which he was suspected. The manner in which this evidence

was derived was certainly contrary to the spirit of the English law, and

repugnant to the feeling and practice of the present day, but on

this evidence vouched by the travelled painter, John the Painter was

condemned and executed. There was no doubt left on any mind either as

to the culprit’s guilt, or to his connexion with Silas Deane; but before

his death he is said to have confessed to some naval officers, that most

of what his accuser had testified against him, was true—that he had,

indeed, applied to Deane, who had promised him a reward of great price

when his work should be done. Nothing transpired which would inculpate

Choiseul the French minister, but as he was still in office, and as his

animus was well-known, he was thought to have been concerned in this

plot likewise. But it failed; and the circumstance had the effect of

still further exciting the enmity of the English people towards the

Americans.

The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol.III. From the Accession of George III. to the Twenty-Third Year of the Reign of Queen Victoria · 第 10 / 75 章