Sec. 8

When in five minutes' time he came back into her room she was still upon

her hearthrug before the fire, with her necklace in her hand, the red

reflections of the flames glowing and winking in her jewels and in her

eyes. He came and sat again in her chair.

"I have been ranting," he said. "I feel I've been--eloquent. You make me

feel like an actor-manager, in a play by Capes.... You are the most

difficult person for me to talk to in all the world--because you mean so

much to me."

She moved impulsively and checked herself and crouched away from him. "I

mustn't touch your hand," she whispered.

"I want to explain."

"You've got to explain."

"I've got quite a definite plan.... But a sort of terror seized me. It

was like--shyness."

"I know. I knew you had a plan."

"You see.... I mean to go to Labrador."

He leant forward with his elbows on his knees and his hands extended,

explanatory. He wanted intensely that she should understand and agree

and his desire made him clumsy, now slow and awkward, now glibly and

unsatisfyingly eloquent. But she comprehended his quality better than he

knew. They were to go away to Labrador, this snowy desert of which she

had scarcely heard, to camp in the very heart of the wilderness, two

hundred miles or more from any human habitation----

"But how long?" she asked abruptly.

"The better part of a year."

"And we are to talk?"

"Yes," he said, "talk and think ourselves together--oh!--the old phrases

carry it all--find God...."

"It is what I dreamt of, Rag, years ago."

"Will you come," he cried, "out of all this?"

She leant across the hearthrug, and seized and kissed his hand....

Then, with one of those swift changes of hers, she was in revolt. "But,

Rag," she exclaimed, "this is dreaming. We are not free. There are the

children! Rag! We cannot leave the children!"

"We can," he said. "We must."

"But, my dear!--our duty!"

"_Is_ it a mother's duty always to keep with her children? They will be

looked after, their lives are organized, there is my mother close at

hand.... What is the good of having children at all--unless their world

is to be better than our world?... What are we doing to save them from

the same bathos as this--to which we have come? We give them food and

health and pictures and lessons, that's all very well while they are

just little children; but we've got no religion to give them, no aim, no

sense of a general purpose. What is the good of bread and health--and no

worship?... What can we say to them when they ask us why we brought them

into the world?--_We_ happened--_you_ happened. What are we to tell them

when they demand the purpose of all this training, all these lessons?

When they ask what we are preparing them for? Just that _you_, too, may

have children! Is that any answer? Marjorie, it's common-sense to try

this over--to make this last supreme effort--just as it will be

common-sense to separate if we can't get the puzzle solved together."

"Separate!"

"Separate. Why not? We can afford it. Of course, we shall separate."

"But Rag!--separate!"

He faced her protest squarely. "Life is not worth living," he said,

"unless it has more to hold it together than ours has now. If we cannot

escape together, then--_I will go alone_."...

Marriage(#35338) · 第 146 / 190 题