‘Perhaps you may think that I approve of running and any

other form of exercise that reduces fat. I do not. I disapprove of

excess in all matters, and I think that every art should aim at

symmetry. If a thing lacks measure, it is in so far bad. So I cannot

approve of track athletics, for they reduce a man’s physical condition

and give him no training in manliness. Victory does not come to those

who run quickly but to those who are able to hold their own in a close

fight, and the Spartans owed their greatness not to their speed of foot

but to their stubborn courage. Even if you considered it purely on

grounds of health, a sport is not healthy in so far as it exercises the

parts of the body unequally. Inevitably, some parts are overstrained,

some left quite idle. Neither of these conditions are good: both foster

the seeds of illness and produce a weak state of health.

‘The exercise I approve of most is one that can give health

of body, symmetry of limbs and excellence of mind: and all these virtues

are found in the small ball. It can benefit the mind in all kinds of

ways; it exercises every part of the body alike--and this is of the

greatest importance for health--for it produces a regular state of

constitution; and it does not lead either to undue corpulence or

excessive thinness: it is competent to perform such acts as require

strength, it is suitable also for those that need quickness.

‘Now if we consider ball games in their most violent form

they are inferior in no respect to any sort of athletics. But we must

also look at them in their milder aspect, for sometimes we need gentle

exercise. We may be either too old or not old enough to stand a severe

strain; we may wish to relax our efforts or be recovering from illness.

I think that in this respect also the small ball has a great advantage,

for no game is quite so gentle, if you wish to take it gently. Should

you need moderate exercise and desire to avoid excess, you will

sometimes step softly forward, sometimes stand quite still: you need not

make any violent effort and you can add to the effect by a warm bath or

a gentle rub down with oil. Of all exercise this is the most gentle: it

is most suitable for one who needs useful recreation, it can revive

failing strength, it is most suitable for old and young alike. There

are, however, some stronger sorts of exercise which can be obtained by

the use of the small ball, although they are milder than the most

intense form of the game, and these must now be considered if we really

wish to treat the subject completely. If ever some unavoidable task,

such as often falls to many a man’s lot, has caused an excessive strain

to all the upper or all the lower parts of the body, or to the arms

alone or to the feet, by the help of the small ball you can rest those

parts that have been overstrained and give the same amount of exercise

to those other parts that were then left quite idle. To stand a fair

distance apart and throw the ball vigorously, without using the legs

hardly at all, rests the lower limbs and gives a somewhat violent

exercise to the upper parts of the body. On the other hand, if you run

most of the way at a good speed keeping a wide distance and seldom throw

the ball, the lower limbs have more work to do. The quickness of action

and the speed required, involve no great muscular strain but they

exercise the lungs, while the vigorous effort, as you grasp the ball and

catch and throw it, although it needs no speed of foot, yet braces and

strengthens the body. If the ball is thrown both vigorously and at full

speed there will be a considerable strain on the body and on the lungs:

it will be indeed the most violent form of exercise possible. But how

far this strain should be relaxed or intensified, as circumstances

require, it is impossible to set down in writing--exact quantities

should never be stated; in actual practice it is easy enough to discover

the proper limit and to instruct others. On actual experience all

depends. The quality of a thing is useless if it is spoilt by a wrong

quantity, and this will be the business of your trainer, who will act as

guide in all matters of exercise.

‘But I must bring my subject to an end. In addition to all

the other advantages, which, as I have said, the small ball possesses,

there is one more which I should not like to omit. It is free from all

the risks to which most other athletic exercises are liable. Before

to-day many a man has died of a broken blood-vessel after a violent

race: and so also the practice of loud and furious shouting, if pursued

without intermission for some time, has often proved the cause of very

serious mischief. Continuous horse-riding ruptures the parts about the

kidneys and often injures the chest, besides in some cases doing harm to

the generative organs. I say nothing of the mistakes that horses make,

whereby frequently their riders have been unseated and killed on the

spot. Many men have also been hurt while jumping, or throwing the

discus, or turning somersaults. As for the frequenters of the wrestling

school, what need I say of them? They are all scarred more shamefully

than the Curse-hags of whom Homer tells us. The great poet describes

them: “Lame and wrinkled and with eyes askance.” And so with the

wrestling master’s pupils, you will find them lame, distorted, battered,

and maimed in some part at least of their body. Since then, in addition

to the other advantages, this freedom from danger is the particular

attribute of small ball games, they must be regarded as the best of all

inventions, so far as actual utility is concerned.’

There are many striking points in the little essay; the importance that

Galen assigns to athletics as part of military training; his insistence

on the moral and intellectual virtue of games and their value in

producing a cheerful frame of mind; his depreciation, on social and

physical grounds, of track-running. It is written obviously from the

standpoint of a physician and not of an athlete or a sportsman. The

athlete might well wish for fuller details of the three different games

of ‘harpastum,’ ‘trigon,’ and ‘follis,’ which are here mentioned rather

than described. The sportsman would probably object to the strictures on

hunting and riding, and reply that a spice of danger gives an additional

zest to exercise. It is noticeable also that in discussing the moral

virtue of games Galen makes no mention of that which we consider their

most important feature, the ‘team-spirit,’ the working not for yourself

but for your side.

Criticisms such as these, however, are ungracious. The ‘small ball’ is a

delightful example of the work of a great practical genius who devoted

his whole life to the service of his fellow-men. In spirit, moreover,

and in method it follows the true Greek tradition, and regards athletics

not as a mere diversion but as the best practical preparation for the

strenuous business of life.

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

_E. N. Gardiner_: Greek Athletic Sports and Festivals. Macmillan,

1910.

_K. J. Freeman_: Schools of Hellas. Macmillan, 1907.

_W. W. Hyde_: Olympic Victor Monuments. Washington, U.S.A., 1921.

_Walter Pater_: Greek Studies. Macmillan, 1895.

_J. B. Bury_: The Nemean Odes of Pindar. Macmillan, 1891.

_E. Bruecke_: The Human Figure. Grevel, 1900.

_D. Watts_: The Renaissance of the Greek Ideal. Heinemann, 1914.

_E. Jaques-Dalcroze_: Rhythm, Music and Education. Chatto and

Windus, 1921.

FOOTNOTES:

[A] _The Arts in Greece._ By F. A. Wright. Longmans, 1923.

[B] E. Myers: _Odes of Pindar_.

Greek Athletics · 第 6 / 6 段