at the Exchange. It is in a building a considerable distance from the
G.P.O., and the Sinn Feiners have made great efforts to capture it. The
girls have been surrounded by firing; shots have several times come into
the switch-room, where the men took down the boards from the back of the
switch-boards and arranged them as shelters over the girls’ heads to
protect them from bullets and broken glass. Eight snipers have been shot
on buildings commanding the Exchange, and one of the guard was killed
yesterday, and these girls have never failed. They have been on duty
since yesterday, sleeping when possible in a cellar, and with indifferent
food, and have cheerfully and devotedly stuck to their post, doing the
work of forty. Only those on duty at the outbreak of the rebellion could
remain, those in their homes could never get back, so with the few men
who take the night duty these girls have kept the whole service going;
all telegrams have had to be sent by ‘’phone,’ and they have simply saved
the situation. It has been magnificent!
The shooting is by no means over, as many of the Sinn Fein strongholds
refuse to surrender. Jacob’s biscuit factory is very strongly held, and
when the rebels were called on to surrender they refused unless they
were allowed to march out carrying their arms!
It is said that when Jacob was told that the military might have to blow
up the factory he replied:
‘They may blow it to blazes for all I care; I shall never make another
biscuit in Ireland.’
I don’t know if this is true, but it very well may be, for he has been
one of the model employers in Dublin. He almost gave up the factory at
the time of the Larkin strike, and only continued it for the sake of his
people, and so it will be with the few great industries in the city.
Dublin is ruined!
Yesterday I made a joyful discovery. When we came back from Italy in
March, H. brought back from the office my large despatch-case, in which
I keep all F.’s letters. I did not remember what else was in it, so I
investigated and found my necklace with jewelled cross and the pink
topaz set—both of these, being in large cases, would not go into the
jewel-case,—also the large old paste buckle, so I am not absolutely
destitute of jewelry. But, best of all, there were the three little
handkerchiefs F. sent me from Armentières with my initial worked on them;
for these I was grieving more than for anything, and when I found them
the relief was so great I sat with them in my hand and cried!
This week has been a wonderful week for N. Never before has a boy of
just seventeen had such an experience. Yesterday morning he was at the
Automobile Club filling cans of petrol from casks for the Red Cross
ambulances; he came in to lunch reeking of petrol! In the afternoon he
went round with the Lord Mayor in an ambulance collecting food for forty
starving refugees from the burnt-out district, housed in the Mansion
House, and after tea went out for wounded and brought in an old man of
seventy-eight shot through the body. He was quite cheery over it and
asked N. if he thought he would recover. ‘Good Lord! Yes; why not?’ said
N., and bucked the old man up!
There is intermittent firing in all directions. I doubt if it will quite
cease for some days, as their strongholds will not surrender.
_May 1, 11 a.m._—I had no time to continue this yesterday, but during the
afternoon three of the rebel strongholds surrendered, Jacob’s, Boland’s,
and the College of Surgeons on St. Stephen’s Green. From this last
building 160 men surrendered and were marched down Grafton Street. It is
said that among them was Countess Marcovitz, dressed in a man’s uniform;
it is also said that the military made her take down the green Republican
flag flying over the building herself and replace it by a white one.
When she surrendered she took off her bandolier and kissed it and her
revolver before handing them to the officer. She has been one of the most
dangerous of the leaders. People who saw them marched down Grafton Street
said they held themselves erect, and looked absolutely defiant!
Yesterday H. revisited the Telephone Exchange and a point was cleared up
that had mystified everyone; and that is why, when the rebels on Easter
Monday took every building of importance and every strategic position,
did they overlook the Telephone Exchange? Had they taken it we should
have been absolutely powerless, unable to send messages or telegrams for
troops. The Exchange is situated in Crown Alley, off Dame Street, and
the Superintendent told H. an extraordinary story. It seems when they
had taken the G.P.O. they marched a detachment to take the Exchange,
when just as they were turning into Crown Alley an old woman rushed
towards them with arms held up calling out ‘Go back, go back; the place
is crammed with military.’ And, supposing it to be in the hands of our
troops, they turned back! This was at noon; at 5 P.M. our troops arrived
and took it over.
This saved the whole situation! Whether the woman was on our side, or if
she thought she had seen soldiers, will never be known....
I have just returned from walking round the G.P.O. and Sackville
Street with H. and some of the officials. It passes all my powers of
description; only one word describes it: ‘desolation.’ If you look at
pictures of Ypres or Louvain after the bombardment, it will give you some
idea of the scene.
We looked up through the windows of the G.P.O. and saw the safe that was
in H.’s room still in the wall, and the door does not appear to have been
opened or the safe touched; but the whole place has been such an inferno,
one would think that door must have been red-hot. Among all the débris
the fire was still smouldering, and we could not penetrate inside. Do you
realise that out of all H.’s library he does not possess a single book,
except one volume of his Dante, and I not even a silver teaspoon!
Everything belonging to F. has gone; as he gave his life in the war, so
an act of war has robbed us of everything belonging to him, our most
precious possession!
_May 2, 10 a.m._—Last evening I walked all round the ruined district.
The streets were thronged with people, and threading their way among
the crowd were all sorts of vehicles—carts carrying the bodies of dead
horses, that had been shot the first day and lain in the streets ever
since; Fire Brigade ambulances followed by Irish cars bringing priests
and driven by Fire Brigade men. The motors with Red Cross emblems,
carrying white-jacketed doctors, would dart along, followed by a trail of
Red Cross nurses on bicycles, in their print dresses and white overalls,
their white cap ends floating behind them, all speeding on their errand
of mercy to the stricken city.
From time to time we came across on the unwashed pavement the large
dark stain telling its own grim story, and in some places the blood had
flowed along the pavement for some yards and down into the gutters; but
enough of horrors. We came sadly back, and on the steps we met Mr. O’B.
returning from a similar walk. He could hardly speak of it, and said he
stood in Sackville Street and cried, and many other men did the same.
Out of all the novel experiences of the last eight days, two things
struck me very forcibly. The first is that under circumstances that might
well have tried the nerves of the strongest, there has been no trace of
fear or panic among the people in the hotel, either among the guests or
staff. Anxiety for absent friends of whom no tidings could be heard,
though living only in the next square, one both felt and heard, but of
fear for their own personal safety I have seen not one trace, and the
noise of battle after the first two days seemed to produce nothing but
boredom. The other fact is a total absence of thankfulness at our own
escape.
It may come, I don’t know; others may feel it, I don’t. I don’t pretend
to understand it, but so it is. Life as it has been lived for the last
two years in the midst of death seems to have blunted one’s desire for
it, and completely changed one’s feelings towards the Hereafter.
_AN AMERICAN AMBULANCE IN THE VERDUN ATTACK._
BY FRANK HOYT GAILOR
‘Our artillery and automobiles have saved Verdun,’ French officers and
soldiers were continually telling me. And as I look back on two months of
ambulance-driving in the attack, it seems to me that automobiles played
a larger part than even the famous ‘seventy-fives,’ for without motor
transport there would have been no ammunition and no food. One shell,
accurately placed, will put a railway communication out of the running,
but automobiles must be picked off one by one as they come within range.
The picture of the attack that will stay with me always is that of the
Grande Route north from Bar-le-Duc, covered with the snow and ice of the
last days of February. The road was always filled with two columns of
trucks, one going north and the other coming south. The trucks, loaded
with troops, shells, and bread, rolled and bobbled back and forth with
the graceless, uncertain strength of baby elephants. It was almost
impossible to steer them on the icy roads. Many of them fell by the
wayside, overturned, burned up, or were left apparently unnoticed in the
ceaseless tide of traffic that never seemed to hurry or to stop.
All night and all day it continued. Soon the roads began to wear out.
Trucks brought stones from the ruins of the Battle of the Marne and
sprinkled them in the ruts and holes; soldiers, dodging in and out of
the moving cars, broke and packed the stones or sprinkled sand on the
ice-covered hillsides. But the traffic was never stopped for any of these
things. The continuous supply had its effect on the demand. There were
more troops than were needed for the trenches, so they camped along the
road or in the fields. Lines of _camions_ ran off the road and unloaded
the reserve of bread; the same thing was done with the meat, which kept
well enough in the snow; and the shells, which a simple _camouflage_ of
white tarpaulins effectually hid from the enemy airmen.
At night, on the main road, I have watched for hours the dimmed lights of
the _camions_, winding away north and south like the coils of some giant
and luminous snake which never stopped and never ended. It was impressive
evidence of a great organisation that depended and was founded on the
initiative of its members. Behind each light was a unit, the driver,
whose momentary negligence might throw the whole line into confusion.
Yet there were no fixed rules to save him from using his brain quickly
and surely as each crisis presented itself. He must be continually awake
to avoid any one of a thousand possible mischances. The holes and ice on
the road, his skidding car, the cars passing in the same and opposite
directions, the cars in front and behind, the cars broken down on the
sides of the road—all these and many other things he had to consider
before using brake or throttle in making his way along. Often snow and
sleet storms were added to make driving more difficult. Objects six feet
away were completely invisible, and it was only by watching the trees
along the side of the road that one could attempt to steer.
I was connected with the _Service des Autos_ as a driver in Section No.
2 of the Field Service of the American Ambulance of Neuilly. We had
the usual French section of twenty ambulances and one staff car, but,
unlike the other sections, we had only one man to a car. There were two
officers, one the Chief of Section, Walter Lovell, a graduate of Harvard
University and formerly a member of the Boston Stock Exchange; and
George Roder, Mechanical Officer, in charge of the supply of parts and
the repair of cars. Before the war, he was a promising bacteriologist
in the Rockefeller Institute. Our section was one of five which compose
the field service of the American Ambulance, and are located at various
points along the front from Dunkirk to the Vosges. The general direction
of the Field Service is in the hands of A. Piatt Andrew, formerly
professor at Harvard and Assistant Secretary of the United States
Treasury. He has organised the system by which volunteers and funds are
obtained in America, and is the responsible link between the work of the
service and the will of the French authorities.
In each of the five sections there are twenty drivers, all Americans and
volunteers. Most of them are college men who have come over from the
United States to ‘do their bit’ for France and see the war at the same
time. Certainly our section was gathered from the four corners of the
‘States.’ One, a graduate of the University of Pennsylvania, had worked
for two years on the Panama Canal as an engineer; another, an Alaskan,
had brought 200 dogs over for the French Government, to be used for
transportation in the Vosges; a third was a well-known American novelist
who had left his home at Florence to be a chauffeur for France. There
were also two architects, a New York undertaker, several soi-disant
students, and a man who owned a Mexican ranch that was not sufficiently
flourishing to keep him at home.
The term of service required by the French authorities is now six months,
though, of course, some of the men have been in the section since the
Battle of the Marne. We all got five sous a day and rations as privates
in the French army, which was represented in our midst by a lieutenant, a
_maréchal de logis_, a mechanic, and a cook.
On February 22 our French lieutenant gave us our ‘order to move,’ but
all he could tell us about our destination was that we were going north.
We started from Bar-le-Duc about noon, and it took us six hours to make
forty miles through roads covered with snow, swarming with troops,
and all but blocked by convoys of food carts and sections of trucks.
Of course, we knew that there was an attack in the neighbourhood of
Verdun, but we did not know who was making it or how it was going. Then
about four o’clock in the short winter twilight we passed two or three
regiments of French colonial troops on the march with all their field
equipment. I knew who and what they were by the curious Eastern smell
that I had always before associated with camels and circuses. They were
lined up on each side of the road around their soup kitchens, which were
smoking busily, and I had a good look at them as we drove along.
It was the first time I had seen an African army in the field, and though
they had had a long march they were cheerful and in high spirits at the
prospect of battle. They were all young, active men, and of all colours
and complexions, from blue-eyed blonds to shiny blacks. They all wore
khaki and brown shrapnel casques bearing the trumpet insignia of the
French sharpshooter. We were greeted with laughter and chaff, for the
most part, in an unknown chatter, but now and again some one would say,
‘Hee, hee, Ambulance Americaine,’ or ‘Yes, Ingliish, Good-bye.’
I was fortunate enough to pick up one of their non-commissioned officers
with a bad foot who was going our way. He was born in Africa, which
accounted for his serving in the colonials, though his mother was
American and his father French. From him I learned that the Germans were
attacking at Verdun, and that, to everyone’s surprise, they were trying
to drive the point of the salient south instead of cutting it off from
east to west. As we were passing along, one of his men shouted something
to him about riding in an ambulance, and I remarked that they all seemed
in a very good humour. ‘Oh yes,’ he answered; ‘we’re glad to be on the
move, as we’ve been _en repos_ since autumn in a small quiet place south
of Paris.’ ‘But it means trouble,’ he added proudly, ‘their sending
us up, for we are never used except in attacks, and were being saved
for the summer. Six hundred have been killed in my company since the
beginning, so I have seen something of this war. Now my regiment is mixed
up with two others, and altogether we make about 4000 men.’
As we talked, I realised that his was a different philosophy from that of
the ordinary _poilu_ that I had been carrying. Certainly he loved France
and was at war for her; but soldiering was his business and fighting was
his life. Nothing else counted. He had long since given up any thought of
coming out alive, so the ordinary limitations of life and death did not
affect him. He wanted to fight and last as long as possible to leave a
famous name in his regiment, and to add as many _citations_ as possible
to the three medals he had already gained. He was the only man I ever met
who was really eager to get back to the trenches, and he said to me with
a smile when I stopped to let him off, ‘Thanks for the lift, my old, but
I hope you don’t have to carry me back.’
After that we rode north along the Meuse, through a beautiful country
where the snow-covered hills, with their sky-lines of carefully pruned
French trees, made me think of masterpieces of Japanese art. In the many
little villages there was much excitement and activity with troops,
artillery, and munitions being rushed through to the front, and the
consequent wild rumours of great attacks and victories. Curiously enough,
there were few who thought of defeat. They were all sure, even when a
retreat was reported, that the French were winning, and that spirit of
confidence had much to do with stopping the Germans.
At about six in the evening we reached our destination some forty miles
north-east of Bar-le-Duc. The little village where we stopped had been a
railroad centre until the day before, when the Germans started bombarding
it. Now the town was evacuated, and the smoking station deserted. The
place had ceased to exist, except for a hospital which was established on
the southern edge of the town in a lovely old chateau, overlooking the
Meuse. We were called up to the hospital as soon as we arrived to take
such wounded as could be moved to the nearest available railhead, which
was ten miles away, on the main road, and four miles south of Verdun. We
started out in convoy, but with the then conditions of traffic, it was
impossible to stick together, and it took some of us till five o’clock
the next morning to make the trip. That was the beginning of the attack
for us, and the work of ‘evacuating’ the wounded to the railway stations
went steadily on until March 15. It was left to the driver to decide
how many trips it was physically possible for him to make in each
twenty-four hours. There were more wounded than could be carried, and no
one could be certain of keeping any kind of schedule with the roads as
they then were.
Sometimes we spent five or six hours waiting at a cross-road, while
columns of troops and their equipment filed steadily by. Sometimes
at night we could make a trip in two hours that had taken us ten in
daylight. Sometimes, too, we crawled slowly to a station only to find
it deserted, shells falling, and the hospital moved to some still more
distant point of the line. Situations and conditions changed from day to
day—almost from hour to hour. One day it was sunshine and spring, with
roads six inches deep in mud, no traffic, and nothing to remind one of
war, except the wounded in the car and the distant roar of the guns,
which sounded like a giant beating a carpet. The next day it was winter
again, with mud turned to ice, the roads blocked with troops, and the
Germans turning hell loose with their heavy guns.
In such a crisis as those first days around Verdun, ammunition and
fresh men are the all-essential things. The wounded are the _déchets_,
the ‘has-beens’, and so must take second place. But the French are too
gallant and tender-hearted not to make sacrifices. I remember one morning
I was slapped off the road into a ditch with a broken axle, while passing
a solitary _camion_. The driver got down, came over, and apologised for
the accident, which was easily half my fault. Then we unloaded four
cases of ‘seventy-five’ shells that he was carrying, and put my three
wounded in on the floor of his car. He set out slowly and carefully up
the ice-covered road, saying to me with a smile as he left, ‘Don’t let
the Boches get my marmites while I’m gone.’ For some time I sat there
alone on the road, watching the shells break on a hill some miles away
to the north, and wondering when I could get word back to the ‘base’ of
my mishap. Then a staff car appeared down the road making its way along
slowly and with difficulty, because, being without chains, it skidded
humorously with engine racing and the chauffeur trying vainly to steer.
There was a captain of the _Service des Autos_ sitting on the front seat,
and he was so immaculately clean and well groomed that he seemed far away
from work of any kind. But when the car stopped completely about half-way
up the little hill on which I was broken down, he jumped out, took off
his fur coat, and using it to give the rear wheels a grip on the ice, he
swung it under the car. As the wheels passed over it, he picked it up and
swung it under again. So the car climbed the hill and slid down the other
slope round the curve and out of sight. It was just another incident
that made me realise the spirit and energy of the French Automobile
Service. But the captain had not solved any of my difficulties. He had
been too busy to notice me or wonder why an American ambulance was
sprawled in a ditch with four cases of shells alongside.
I had been waiting there in the road about two hours when another
American came by and took back word of my accident and of the parts
necessary to set it right. Then about noon my friend came back in his
_camion_ to take up his cases of shells and report my wounded safe at the
railway station. We lunched together on the front seat of the _camion_ on
bread, tinned ‘monkey meat,’ and red wine, while he told me stories about
his life as a driver. He had been on his car then for more than twenty
days without leaving it for food or sleep. That morning his ‘partner’ had
been wounded by a shell, so he had to drive all that day alone. Usually
the two men drive two hours, turn and turn about; while one is driving,
the other can eat, sleep, or read the day before yesterday’s newspaper.
The French _camions_ are organised in sections of twenty. Usually each
section works in convoy, and has its name and mark painted on its cars.
I saw some with elephants or ships, some with hearts or diamonds, clubs
or spades, some with dice—in fact every imaginable symbol has been used
to distinguish the thousands of sections in the service. The driver
told me there were more than ten thousand trucks working between Verdun
and Bar-le-Duc. There is great rivalry between the men of the several
sections in matters of speed and load—especially between the sections of
French and those of American or Italian cars. The American product has
the record for speed, which is, however, offset by its frequent need of
repair.
My friend told me about trips he had made up as far as the third line
trenches, and how they were using ‘seventy-fives’ like machine-guns in
dug-outs, where the shells were fired at ‘zero’ so that they exploded
immediately after leaving the mouth of the gun. The French, he said,
would rather lose guns than men, and according to him, there were so many
guns placed in the ‘live’ parts of the sector that the wheels touched,
and so formed a continuous line.
As soon as we had finished lunch he left me, and I waited for another
two hours until the American staff car (in other surroundings I should
call it an ordinary Ford touring car with a red cross or so added), came
along loaded with an extra ‘rear construction,’ and driven by the chief
himself. It took us another four hours to remove my battered rear axle
and put in the new parts, but my car was back in service by midnight.
That was a typical instance of the kind of accident that was happening,
and there were about three ‘Ford casualties’ every day. Thanks to the
simplicity of the mechanism of the Ford, and to the fact that, with the
necessary spare parts, the most serious indisposition can be remedied
in a few hours, our section has been at the front for a year—ten months
in the Bois-le-Prêtre, and two months at Verdun—without being sent back
out of service for general repairs. In the Bois-le-Prêtre we had carried
the wounded from the dressing stations to the first hospital, while at
Verdun we were on service from the hospital to the railheads. In this
latter work of _évacuation_ the trips were much longer, thirty to ninety
miles, so the strain on the cars was correspondingly greater. As our
cars, being small and fast, carried only three wounded on stretchers or
five seated, our relative efficiency was low in comparison with the wear
and tear of the ‘running gear’ and the amount of oil and petrol used. But
in the period from February 22 to March 13, twenty days, with an average
of eighteen cars working, we carried 2046 wounded 18,915 miles. This
would be no record on good open roads, but with the conditions I have
already described I think it justified the existence of our volunteer
organisation—if it needed justification. Certainly the French thought so,
but they are too generous to be good judges.
Except for our experiences on the road, there was little romance in
the daily routine. True, we were under shell fire, and had to sleep in
our cars or in a much-inhabited hayloft, and eat in a little inn, half
farmhouse and half stable, where the food was none too good and the
cooking none too clean; but we all realised that the men in the trenches
would have made of such conditions a luxurious paradise, so that kept us
from thinking of it as anything more than a rather strenuous ‘camping
out.’
During the first days of the attack, the roads were filled with refugees
from the town of Verdun and the country north of it. As soon as the
bombardment started, civilians were given five hours to leave, and we
saw them—old men, women, and children—struggling along through the snow
on their way south. It was but another of those sad migrations that
occur so often in the ‘Zone des Armées.’ The journey was made difficult
and often dangerous for them by the columns of skidding trucks, so the
more timid took to the fields or the ditches at the roadside. They were
for the most part the _petits bourgeois_ who had kept their shops open
until the last minute, to make the town gay for the troops, who filed
through the Promenade de la Digue in an endless queue on their way to
and from the trenches. Most of them had saved nothing but the clothes
on their backs, though I saw one old woman courageously trundling a
barrow overflowing with laces, post cards, bonbons (doubtless the famous
_Dragées Verdunoises_), and other similar things which had been part of
her stock-in-trade, and with which she would establish a Verdun souvenir
shop when she found her new home. There were many peasant carts loaded
with every imaginable article of household goods from stoves to bird
cages, but no matter what else a cart might contain, there was always a
mattress with the members of the family, old and young, bouncing along on
top. So ubiquitous was this mattress that I asked about it, and was told
that the French peasant considers it the most important of his Lares, for
it is there his babies are born and his old people die—there too, is the
family bank, the hiding-place for the _bas de laine_.
All the people, no matter what their class or station, were excited. Some
were resigned, some weeping, some quarrelling, but every face reflected
terror and suffering, for these derelicts had been suddenly torn from the
ruins of their old homes and their old lives after passing through two
days of the heaviest bombardment the world has ever seen.
I did not wonder at their grief or terror when I had seen the town from
which they fled. Sometimes it is quiet, with no shells and no excitement;
at others it is a raging hell, a modern Pompeii in the ruining. Often I
passed through the town, hearing and seeing nothing to suggest that any
enemy artillery was within range. But one morning I went up to take a
doctor to a near-by hospital, and had just passed under one of the lovely
old twelfth-century gates, with its moat and towers, when the Germans
commenced their morning hate. I counted 150 shells, ‘arrivés,’ in the
first quarter of an hour.
After making my way up on the old fortifications in the north-eastern
quarter, I had an excellent view of the whole city—a typical garrison
town of Northern France spreading over its canals and river up to the
Citadel and Cathedral on the heights. Five and six shells were shrieking
overhead at the same time, and a corresponding number of houses in the
centre of the town going up in dust and débris, one after another, almost
as fast as I could count.
During this bedlam a military gendarme strolled up as unconcerned as if
he had been looking out for a stranger in the Champs Elysées. He told
me about a dug-out that was somewhere ‘around the corner.’ But we both
got so interested watching the shells and their effect that we stayed
where we were. The gendarme had been in the town long enough to become
an authority on bombardments, and he could tell me the different shells
and what they were hitting, from the coloured smoke which rose after each
explosion and hung like a pall over the town in the windless spring air.
When the shells fell on the Cathedral—often there were three breaking
on and around it at the same time—there sprang up a white cloud, while
on the red tiles and zinc roofs they exploded in brilliant pink and
yellow puffs. The air was filled with the smell of the burning celluloid
and coal-tar products used in the manufacture of the high explosive
and incendiary shells. It was very impressive, and even my friend the
gendarme said, ‘_C’est chic, n’est-ce pas?_ It’s the heaviest rain we
have had for several days.’ Then he pointed to the left where a column
of flame and smoke, heavier than that from the shells, was rising, and
said, ‘Watch them now, and you’ll understand their system, the _cochons_.
That’s a house set afire with their incendiary shells, and now they will
throw shrapnel around it to keep our firemen from putting it out.’ And so
they did, for I could see the white puffs of the six-inch shrapnel shells
breaking in and around the column of black smoke, which grew denser
all the time. Then two German Taubes, taking advantage of the smoke,
came over and dropped bombs, for no other reason than to add terror to
the confusion. But the eighty firemen, a brave little band brought up
from Paris with their hose-carts and engine, refused to be confused or
terrified. Under the shells and smoke we could see the streams of water
playing on the burning house. ‘They are working from the cellars,’ said
the gendarme. It was fortunate there was no wind, for that house was
doomed, and but for the fact that all the buildings were stone, the fire
would have spread over all that quarter of the town despite the gallantry
of the firemen.
The bombardment continued steadily for about two hours and a half, until
several houses were well alight and many others completely destroyed.
Then about noon it stopped as suddenly as it had started. I wanted to go
down and watch the firemen work, but the gendarme, who had produced an
excellent bottle of no ordinary ‘_pinard_,’ said, ‘Wait awhile, my old,
that is part of the system. They have only stopped to let the people
come out. In a few minutes it will start again, when they will have more
chance of killing somebody.’
But for once he was wrong, and after waiting with him for half an hour,
I went down to the first house I had seen catch fire. The firemen
were still there, working with hose and axe to prevent the fire from
spreading. The four walls of the house were still standing, but inside
there was nothing but a furnace which glowed and leapt into flame with
every draught of air, so that the sparks flew over the neighbouring
houses, and started other fires which the firemen were busy controlling.
These _pompiers_ are no longer civilians. The black uniform and gay
brass and leather helmet of Paris fashion have been replaced with the
blue-grey of the _poilu_, with the regulation steel shrapnel casque or
_bourguignotte_. The French press has had many accounts of their heroism
since the beginning of the attack. Certainly if any of the town is left,
it will be due to their efforts among the ruins. There are only eighty of
them in the town. Half of them are men too old for ‘_active service_,’
yet they have stayed there for two months working night and day under the
shells, with the strain of the bombardment added to the usual dangers
from falling walls and fire. They are still as gay and eager as ever.
Their spirit and motto is the same as that of every soldier and civilian
who is doing hard work in these hard times. They all say, ‘It is war,’ or
more often, ‘It is for France.’
I left them saving what they could of the house, and walked on over the
river through the town. It is truly the Abomination of Desolation. The
air was heavy and hot with the smell of explosives and the smoke from the
smouldering ruins. Not a sound broke the absolute quiet and not a soul
was in sight. I saw two dogs and a cat all slinking about on the search
for food, and evidently so crazed with terror that they could not leave
their old homes. Finally, crossing over the canal, where the theatre, now
a heap of broken beams and stones, used to stand, I met an old bearded
Territorial leaning over the bridge with a net in his hand to dip out
fish killed by the explosion of the shells in the water. He did not
worry about the danger of his position on the bridge, and, like all true
fishermen, when they have had good luck, he was happy and philosophical.
‘One must live,’ said he, ‘and it’s very amiable of the Boches to keep us
in fish with their marmites, _n’est-ce pas, mon vieux_?’ We chatted for a
while of bombardments, falling walls, and whether the Germans would reach
Verdun. He, of course, like every soldier in that region, was volubly
sure they would not. Then I went on up the hill towards the Cathedral, by
the old library, which was standing with doors and windows wide open, and
with the well-ordered books still on the tables and in the shelves. As
yet it is untouched by fire or shell, but too near the bridge to escape
for long.
I continued my way through streets filled with fallen wires, broken
glass, and bits of shell. Here and there were dead horses and broken
waggons caught in passing to or from the lines. There is nothing but
ruins left of the lovely residential quarter below the Cathedral. The
remaining walls of the houses, gutted by flame and shell, stand in a
wavering line along a street, blocked with débris, and with furniture and
household articles that the firemen have saved. The furniture is as safe
in the middle of the street as anywhere else in the town. As I passed
along I could hear from time to time the crash and roar of falling walls,
and see the rising clouds of white stone dust that has settled thickly
everywhere.
The Cathedral, with its Bishop’s Palace and cloisters—all fine old
structures of which the foundations were laid in the eleventh and twelfth
centuries—must from its commanding position overlooking the town, be
singled out for destruction. I watched ten shells strike the Cathedral
that one morning, and some of them were the terrible ‘380’s,’ the shells
of the 16-inch mortars, which make no noise as they approach and tear
through to the ground before their explosion.
The interior of the Cathedral, blurred with a half-inch layer of stone
dust, is in most ‘unchurchly’ disorder. Four or five shells have torn
large holes through the roof of the nave, and twice as many more have
played havoc with the chapels and aisles at the side. One has fallen
through the gilded canopy over the high altar and broken one of the four
supporting columns, which before were monoliths like those of St. Peter’s
at Rome. Of course, most of the stained glass windows are scattered
in fragments over the floor, and through the openings on the southern
side I could see the ruins of the cloisters, with some chairs and a bed
literally falling into them from a room of the Bishop’s Palace above.
This destruction of the Cathedral is typical of the purposeless barbarity
of the whole proceeding. The wiping out of the town can serve no military
purpose. There are no stores of munitions or railway communications to
be demolished. Naturally there are no troops quartered in the town, and
now all extensive movements of convoys are conducted by other roads than
those leading through the town. Yet the bombardment continues day after
day, and week after week. The Germans are sending in about £5,000,000
worth of shells a month. ‘It’s spite,’ a _poilu_ said to me; ‘they have
made up their minds to destroy the town since they can’t capture it; but
it will be very valuable as an iron mine after the war.’
_THE SPINE OF AN EMPIRE._
BY MAJOR-GEN. G. F. MACMUNN, C.B., D.S.O.
_In Agypt’s land on banks of Noile_
_King Pharaoh’s royal daughter went to bath in shtoile;_
_She had her dip and hied into the land,_
_To dry her royal pelt she ran along the sand._
_A Bulrush thripped her and at her foot she saw_
_The little Moases, in a wad of sthraw._
Fragment, _The Finding of Moses_, ANON.
Never in the cinema of all time have there been such films to record as
on the stage of Egypt. Certain localities are preordained to attract
the come and go of the world, and before all others the Nile delta
has this property. Its strategical location in the world’s assembling
has compelled the holders of power and might and majesty and dominion
to crowd therein. No decay of empires can affect the significance of
geographical siting. Mena and Cheops and Khefren give place to Amenemhats
and Thotmes and a host of Rameses, who yield in turn to such modernities
as the Ptolemies, but the Nile remains the Nile, and the Red Sea the
waterway from East to West.
As Darius and Xerxes and Alexander were compelled by the call of
strategical law, so came Salah-ud-Din and Napoleon and Ferdinand de
Lesseps and Sir Garnet Wolseley. And here, too, would come William of
Hohenzollern, boasting to break the spine of the British Empire, in the
vertebræ that Chesney planned and De Lesseps made.
Between Alexander the Great and William of Hohenzollern the host of
moderns has been legion, but it was for Napoleon and his dreams of
Eastern Empire to bring the British into the scene to short circuit their
sea routes. Since the Corsican brought his legions, his savants, and his
artists to the Pyramids, the English have entered into the joint control
of the Levant, and to help them have brought the armies of India. With
Abercromby came David Baird and his sepoys. Sir Garnet Wolseley, in
Egypt and in the Soudan, had Indian troops to help him, and now, lest
William of Hohenzollern and his Ottoman allies should ‘break the British
spine,’ and disturb the peace and plenty of Egypt, not only has India
sent troops, but all elements of the Empire far and near. Never, even in
the days of Alexander’s armies, had so many varied contingents garrisoned
Egypt, as came when the Hun threatened the Canal in force.
In the late autumn of 1915, what time Serbia was broken on the wheel, the
Hun determined to overrun Egypt and Sinai and Goshen, breaking thereby
the British spine. But the Mistress of the Sea said No. The army of
Gallipoli was conjured back from the Hellespont and the outer Empire sent
its levies, and the great plans of the All-Highest were ‘postponed.’
The force gathered in Egypt was the most wonderful combination of the
Empire that can be imagined. To the gathering came first and most famous
a division of the old army, the army that has held the line from the
Yser to the Aisne, and lies in a grave and lives in a memory for its
guerdon, the world round. With them were Territorial divisions, and
divisions of the new army, brigades of yeomen, divisions from Australia
and New Zealand, the Maoris cheek by jowl with the white, a model in this
respect to the rest of the Empire. Not only was the Indian army proper
there—Gurkha, Sikh, and Pathan in due and ancient form—but the armies of
the protected states, those imperial service contingents, the wisdom of
their conception yearly more apparent. But the tally of Empire ended not
with Gwalior, Mysore, and Bikaneer. Hospitals from Canada, Sambo from
the West Indies cleaning his rifle to Moody and Sankey hymns, and the
Afrikander corps of Dutch and English added to that pageant of Empire,
standing four-square with the troops of the Sultan himself.
Strategically to the world’s power and commerce, the situation of Egypt
is as favourable now as in the days of Alexander, and troops are as well
placed there against emergency as anywhere, and as the danger to Egypt
lessened were ready to be sent by those who rule the sea North, South,
East, or West. Troops can come and go and be switched back quicker than
foes can assemble.
The defending of the canal, a waterless tract, void of roads in
its immediate vicinity, is no easy matter and a subject of much
controversy, the manner of its defence depending, like that of most
other localities, on the troops available and the strength of the enemy
threat. The difficulties have been overcome by a herculean effort. Atkins
bathes happily in its water, and watches the ships of allies and of
neutrals—those lesser breeds who wait—pass us safely.
To most of the English the canal has seemed a desert track dotted with
lonely _gares_, akin in their solitude to a Red Sea lighthouse. A further
acquaintance with them has dispelled many imaginings. The _gares_, the
friendly _chefs de gare_, and their brimming quivers have assumed a
different aspect from their ancient one of milestones on the road to
India.
British patrols thread the ancient course of the Nile now dry, the
Pelusiac and Tanaitic channels that found the sea east of the canal and
explain the delta-like lagoons that still remain. The ruins of Pelusium
and the ancient channel explain how Cleopatra, defeated on the high seas,
escaped by water inland to Damietta, and how the Holy Family found the
road to Egypt far easier than it is now. Across Lake Menzalah from Port
Said lie the ruins of Tanais, the capital of the Pharaohs in the time
of Moses. El Qantara, a British post, closes the road from Palestine to
Egypt that has run since time was, and that has seen in our own time the
legions of Napoleon march by the bridge over the arm of the marsh for
Syria. ‘_Partant pour la Syrie_’ with a vengeance, many, poor souls, to
die miserably.
And no doubt over the El Qantara rode also the _savants_ in their
high hats and veils, their long _directoire_ coats and their striped
pantaloons—like any member of the various royal societies of to-day, but
with the chill off—while the escorting _chasseurs_ chaffed them and their
umbrellas.
So to-day Port Said and Suez and Ismailia and Cairo are full of the
soldiery, and a wide camp is spread under the Pyramid of Ghizr, and
young officers walk along the groyne at Port Said, asking ‘what is the
history of that funny old green statue’ which stands a wonder of the
world, like the _Phare_ in ancient Alexandria. Shades of Ferdinand de
Lesseps and Rawdon Chesney! What, indeed, is the history of that ‘funny
old green statue,’ and the ‘spine of the British Empire’ as the Hun
has immortalised it? It is a phrase for which we may thank William of
Hohenzollern.
The mass of the force in Egypt transferred from Gallipoli, rage the
‘_unterseebote_’ never so fiercely, is resting and retraining. If you’ve
been six months on Gallipoli you’ll run a mile to see a nursing sister,
and both Atkins and his officers are soft of heart. Graceful Cairenes in
French cut skirts of black _crépe de chine_ with ever the topmost button
undone, with black head-shawls of the same material, and evanescent veils
that faintly cloud to distraction the face below the eyes, are strong
wine for young soldiers. So attractive is the dress that the old hand
will tell you that many another than Cairenes will don the dress when
out for a spree—a disguise that also enhances attraction is a good find,
_mesdames_!
Atkins himself and Hotspur the yeoman are nothing if not gallant. Here is
a true story from Port Said. Time about 8 P.M. Attractive English lady
hears two soldiers walking fast behind who come up one on either side.
FIRST SOLDIER. Beg pardon, miss, do you speak English?
ATTRACTIVE LADY. Yes.
BOTH SOLDIERS. Oh, you are English!
FIRST SOLDIER. I think we saw you waving out of the window.
ATTRACTIVE LADY. I think you are mistaking me for Mrs. Brown’s nursemaid!
SECOND SOLDIER (_severely_). You must be an ass to take this young lady
for a nursemaid!
BOTH SOLDIERS. Perhaps we ought not to have spoken, but we are very
lonely—may we walk with you?
ATTRACTIVE LADY. I am going this way.
FIRST SOLDIER. Would you tell us who you are, miss?
ATTRACTIVE LADY. I am the chaplain’s sister. (_Sensation and silence._)
FIRST SOLDIER (_plucking up courage_). We never saw a chaplain’s sister
like you before.
SECOND SOLDIER. No, indeed, only one I knew was enough to give you the
’orrors.
ATTRACTIVE LADY (_somewhat flattered, stopping at door of a house under a
street lamp_). I must say good-night now. I live here.
BOTH SOLDIERS. Now we see you we are sorry we spoke to you, for we can
see you are more one for the officers than for us.
(_Exit._)
And so it runs from Putney to Port Said, and from Cambridge to Cairo.
Soldiers are very susceptible gents, as the late Francis Bacon knew and
so stated.
And while one big army has delved and dug and built on the canal and
taken toll of Sinai, another force has chased the Senussi up and down
the Western desert, and yeomen from the shires have watered their horses
at the garden steps of the week-end villa at Matrush, where Antony
entertained Cleopatra. This is no doubt foretold by one of the minor
prophets whom Voltaire considered _capable de tout_. It is certainly a
dramatic event for those who moralise on empires’ rise and wane.
Hardly less striking is the prolonged pursuit and charge of the Senussi
by His Grace of Westminster at the head of the motor bandits—as the army
_will_ call the armoured motor-car—in that same Western desert. The
hyacinth and the iris grew for a wonder on surface free from shifting
sands, and the armoured car trick was brought off in a fashion and with
a dash that its promoters could hardly have hoped for in their most
enthusiastic moments.
War has brought many surprises and troubles to the desert and its
denizens. In Sinai, where the Bedouin lives by the date palm, there has
come starvation, and why? Because the female date must be fertilised by
hand, and the male dates are few and far between. The date fertiliser is
a skilled professional and lives in Egypt, and Turks in Sinai have meant
that date trees go unwed. The which is a parable. There is no remedy
save perhaps one similar to that suggested by the American mayor to the
man who complained that the ‘wather had come into me back cellar and
drowned all me hins.’ ‘Young man, I should advise you to keep ducks,’
and the Bedouin might grow the hermaphrodite date. In the country of the
scarabæus it might well be found as Alexander’s soldiers left it on the
Indus. If war has brought harm to some, it has in Egypt brought profit
to the many, and the Greek is ever ready to trade, and merchants one and
all have risen to the occasion and waxed fat. In Alexandria the Greek
influence is very great and sympathy with the Allies considerable. The
Greek will tell you they come of a northern stock, and will quote the
body worship of the _bel âge_ to illustrate affinity with the English,
and that Greeks alone of all Levantine races or Latin races either have
pronounced ‘_th_’ since time was like the English—which, be it true or
false, all makes for good trade. The soldiery all the year are better
than the Americans in the winter, and Young Australia has money to spend.
Another wonder of the ages is that Egypt from the Pyramids to Tel el
Kebir should be the Aldershot of the Australians and New Zealanders,
where Tommy Cornstalk learns to obey for a common cause and to let off
steam in the process.
And over it all grin in the morning sun the Ethiopian lips of the
Sphinx—noting one more trivial mark of chalk on granite, one more grain
of sand in the hour-glass, one more struggle of the captains and the
kings, one more grim grin at peoples rending themselves—perhaps the
thousand-year-long grin sprang from the knowledge that it had only to
endure long enough to see William of Hohenzollern show the world the way
of peace, while the very sand mocked back again.
‘_SWEET LAVENDER._’
BY GEORGE A. BIRMINGHAM.
Was ever a name less appropriately given? I have heard of a Paradise
Court in a grimy city slum and a dilapidated whitewashed house on the
edge of a Connaught bog which had somehow got itself called Monte Carlo.
But these misfits of names moved me only to mirth mingled with a certain
sadness. Sweet Lavender is a sheer astonishment. I hear the words and
think of the edgings of old garden borders, straggling spiky little
bushes with palely, unobtrusive flowers. I think of linen cupboards, of
sheets and pillow-cases redolent with very delicate perfume. I think of
the women who wander through such gardens, who find a pride in their
store of scented house-linen, delicately nurtured ladies, very gentle,
a little tinged with melancholy, innocent, sweet. My thoughts wander
through memories and guesses about their ways of life. Nothing in the
whole long train of thought prepares me for, or tends in any way to
suggest this Sweet Lavender.
It is a building. In the language of the Army—the official language—it
is a hut; but hardly more like the hut of civil life than it is like the
flower from which it takes its name. The walls are of thin wood. The roof
is corrugated iron. It contains two long low halls. Glaring electric
lights hang from the rafters. They must glare if they are to shine at
all, for the air is thick with tobacco smoke. Inside the halls are
gathered hundreds of soldiers. In one, that which we enter first, the men
are sitting, packed close together at small tables. They turn over the
pages of illustrated papers. They drink tea, cocoa, and hot milk. They
eat buns and slices of bread and butter. They write those letters home
which express so little and, to those who understand, mean so much. Of
the letters written home from camp, half at least are on paper which bear
the stamp of the Y.M.C.A.—paper given to all who ask in this hut and a
score of others. Reading, eating, drinking, writing, chatting, or playing
draughts, everybody smokes. Everybody, such is the climate, reeks with
damp. Everybody is hot. The last thing that the air suggests to the nose
of one who enters is the smell of Sweet Lavender.
In the other, the inner hall, there are more men, still more closely
packed together, smoking more persistently, and the air is even denser.
Here no one is eating, no one reading. Few attempt to write. The
evening’s entertainment is about to begin. On a narrow platform at one
end of the hall is a piano. A pianist has taken possession of it. He
has been selected by no one in authority, elected by no committee. He
has occurred, emerged from the mass of men; by virtue of some energy
within him has made good his position in front of the instrument. He
flogs the keys and above the babel of talk sounds some rag-time melody,
once popular, now forgotten or despised at home. Here or there a voice
takes up the tune and sings or chants it. The audience begin to catch the
spirit of the entertainment. Some one calls the name of Corporal Smith. A
man struggles from his seat and leaps on to the platform. He is greeted
with applauding cheers. There is a short consultation between him and the
pianist. A tentative chord is struck. Corporal Smith nods approval and
turns to the audience. His song begins. If it is the kind of song which
has a chorus the audience shouts it, and Corporal Smith conducts the
singing with wavings of his arm.
Corporal Smith is a popular favourite. We know his worth as a singer,
demand and applaud him. But there are other candidates for favour.
Before the applause has died away, while still acknowledgments are being
bowed, another man takes his place on the platform. He is a stranger,
and no one knows what he will sing. But the pianist is a man of genius.
Whisper to him the name of a song, give even a hint of its nature, let
him guess at the kind of voice, bass, baritone, tenor, and he will vamp
an accompaniment. He has his difficulties. A singer will start at the
wrong time, will for a whole verse perhaps make noises in a different
key; the pianist never fails. Somehow, before very long, instrument
and singer get together—more or less. There is no dearth of singers,
no bashful hanging back, no waiting for polite pressure. Everyone who
can sing, or thinks he can, is eager to display his talent. There is no
monotony. A boisterous comic song is succeeded by one about summer roses,
autumn leaves, and the kisses of a maiden at a stile. The vagaries of a
drunkard are a matter for roars of laughter. A song about the beauty of
the rising moon pleases us all equally well. An original genius sings a
song of his own composition, rough-hewn verses set to a familiar tune,
about the difficulty of obtaining leave and the longing that is in all
our hearts for a return to ‘Blighty; dear old Blighty.’ Did ever men
before fix such a name on the standard for which they fight? Now and
again some one comes forward with a long narrative song, a kind of ballad
chanted to a tune very difficult to catch. It is about as hard to keep
track with the story as to pick up the tune. Words—better singers fail in
the same way—are not easily distinguished, though the man does his best,
clears his throat carefully between each verse and spits over the edge of
the platform to improve his enunciation. No one objects to that. About
manners and dress the audience is very little critical. But about the
merits of the songs and the singers the men express their opinions with
the utmost frankness. The applause is genuine, and the singer who wins it
is under no doubt about its reality. The song which makes no appeal is
simply drowned by loud talk, and the unfortunate singer will crack his
voice in vain in an endeavour to regain the attention he has lost.
Encores are rare, and the men are slow to take them. There is a man
towards the end of the evening who wins one, unmistakably, with an
imitation of a drunkard singing ‘Alice, where art Thou?’ The pianist
fails to keep in touch with the hiccoughing vagaries of this performance,
and the singer, unabashed, finishes without accompaniment. The audience
yells with delight and continues to yell till the singer comes forward
again. This time he gives us a song about leaving home, a thing of
heart-rending pathos, and we wail the chorus:
‘It’s sad to be giving the last hand-shake,
It’s sad the last long kiss to take,
It’s sad to say farewell.’
The entertainment draws to its close about 8 o’clock. Men go to bed
betimes who know that a bugle will sound the réveillé at 5.30 in the
morning. The end is always the same, but always comes strangely, always
as a surprise. We sing a hymn, for choice a very sentimental hymn. We say
a short prayer, often as rugged and unconventional as the entertainment
itself. Then ‘The King.’ In these two words we announce the national
anthem, and the men stand stiffly to attention while they sing. At
half-past eight, by order of the supreme authorities, Sweet Lavender hut
must close its doors. The end of the entertainment is planned to allow
time for a final cup of tea or a last glass of Horlick’s Malted Milk
before we go out to flounder through the mud to our tents. This last
half-hour is a busy one for the ladies behind the counter in the outer
hall. Long queues of men stand waiting to be served. Dripping cups and
sticky buns are passed to them with inconceivable rapidity. The work is
done at high pressure, but with the tea and the food the men receive
something else, something they pay no penny for, something whose value to
them is above all measuring with pennies—the friendly smile, the kindly
word, of a woman. We can partly guess at what these ladies have given
up at home to do this work—servile, sticky, dull work—for men who are
neither kith nor kin to them. No one will ever know the amount of good
they do; without praise, pay, or hope of honours, often without thanks.
If ‘the actions of the just smell sweet and blossom,’ surely these deeds
of love and kindness have a fragrance of surpassing sweetness. Perhaps,
after all, the hut is well-named Sweet Lavender. The discerning eye sees
the flowers through the mist of steaming tea. We catch the perfume while
we choke in the reek of tobacco smoke, damp clothes, and heated bodies.
It is not every Y.M.C.A. which is honoured with a name. Sweet Lavender
stands alone here among huts distinguished only by numbers. But surely
they should all be called after flowers, for in them grow the sweetest
blooms of all.
_BILFRED._
BY JEFFERY E. JEFFERY.
_... Fellow creature I am, fellow-servant_
_Of God: can man fathom God’s dealings with us?..._
_Oh! man! we, at least, we enjoy, with thanksgiving,_
_God’s gifts on this earth, though we look not beyond._
_You sin and you suffer, and we, too, find sorrow_
_Perchance through your sin—yet it soon will be o’er;_
_We labour to-day and we slumber to-morrow,_
_Strong horse and bold rider! and who knoweth more?_
A. LINDSAY GORDON.
I.
In some equine Elysium where there are neither flies nor dust nor steep
hills nor heavy loads; where there is luscious young grass unlimited with
cool streams and shady trees; where one can roam as one pleases and rest
when one is tired: there, far from the racket of gun wheels on hard roads
and the thunder of opposing artillery, oblivious of all the insensate
folly of this warring human world, reposes, I doubt it not, the soul of
Bilfred.
His was a humble part. He was never richly caparisoned with embroidered
bridle and trappings of scarlet and gold. He never swept over the desert
beneath some Arab sheikh with the cry ‘Allah for all!’ ringing in his
ears. He bore no general to victory, no king to his coronation. But he
served his country faithfully, and in the end, when he had helped to make
some history, he died for it.
It is eight years since he joined the battery—a woolly-coated, babyish
remount straight from an Irish dealer’s yard. Examining him carefully we
found that beneath his roughness he was not badly shaped; a trifle long
in the back perhaps, and a shade too tall—but then perfection is not
attainable at the government price. There was no denying that his head
was plain and his face distinctly ugly. From his pink and flabby muzzle a
broad streak of white ran upwards to his forehead, widening on the near
side so as almost to reach his eye. The grotesquely lop-sided effect of
this was enhanced by a tousled forelock which straggled down between his
ears.
The question of naming him arose and some one said: ‘Except for his face,
which is like nothing on earth, he’s the image of old Alfred that we cast
last year.’
Now a system prevailed in the battery by which horses were called by
names which began with the letter of their subsection.
‘Well,’ said some one else, ‘he’s been posted to B sub; why not call him
Bilfred?’
And Bilfred he became.
Our rough-rider at the time was a patient man, enthusiastic enough over
his job to take endless trouble with young horses. This was fortunate for
the new-comer, who proved at first an obdurate pupil. Scientists tell
us, of course, that in relative brain-power the horse ranks low in the
animal scale—lower than the domestic pig, in fact. This may be so, but
Bilfred was certainly an exception. It was obvious, too obvious, that he
_thought_, that he definitely used his brain to question the advisability
of doing any given thing. To his rebellious Celtic nature there must
have been added a percentage of Scotch caution. When any new performance
was demanded of him he would ask himself, ‘Is there any personal risk in
this, and even if not, is there any sense in doing it?’ Unless satisfied
on these points he would plead ignorance and fear and anger alternately
until convinced that it would be less unpleasant to acquiesce. For
instance, being driven round in a circle in the riding school at the end
of a long rope struck him as a silly business; but when he discovered
(after a week) that he could neither break the rope nor kick the man who
was holding it, he (metaphorically) shrugged his shoulders and trotted
or walked, according to orders, with a considerable show of willing
intelligence. It took four men half a day to shoe him for the first time,
and he was in a white lather when they had finished. But on the next and
on every subsequent occasion he was as docile as any veteran.
A saddle was first placed upon him, at a moment when his attention was
distracted by a handful of corn offered to him by a confederate of the
rough-rider’s. He even allowed himself to be girthed up without protest.
But when, suddenly and without due warning, he felt the weight of a man
upon his back, his horror was apparent. For a moment he stood stock
still, trembling slightly and breathing hard. Then he made a mighty bound
forward and started to kick his best. To no purpose; he could not get
his head down, and the more he tried, the more it hurt him. The weight
meanwhile remained upon his back. Exhausted, he stood still again and
gave vent to a loud snort. His face depicted his thoughts. ‘I’m done
for,’ he felt, ‘this thing is here for ever.’ He was soothed and petted
until his first panic had subsided; then coaxed into a good humour
again with oats. At the end of a minute or so he was induced to move
forward—cautiously, nervously at first, and then with more confidence.
‘Unpleasant but not dangerous’ was his verdict. In half an hour he was
resigned to his burden.
Yet not entirely. Every day when first mounted he gave two or three
hearty kicks. He hated the cold saddle on his back for one thing, and
for another there was always a vague hope.... One day, about a fortnight
afterwards, this hope fructified. A loose-seated rider, in a moment of
bravado, got upon him and immediately the customary performance began. At
the second plunge the man shot up into space and landed heavily on the
tan. Bilfred, palpably as astonished as he was pleased, tossed his head,
snorted in triumph and bolted round the school, kicking at intervals.
For five thrilling minutes he enjoyed the best time he had had since he
left Connemara. Then, ignominiously, he succumbed to the temptation of a
proffered feed tin and was caught, discovering too late, to his chagrin,
that the tin was empty. It was his first experience of the deceitfulness
of man, and he did not forget it.
Six weeks later he had become a most accomplished person. He could walk
and trot and even canter in a lumbering way; he answered to rein and leg,
could turn and twist, go sideways and backwards; greatest miracle of all,
he had been taught to lurch in ungainly fashion over two-foot-six of
furze.
But he had accomplished something beyond all this. He had acquired a
reputation. It had become known throughout the battery that there were
certain things which could not be done to Bilfred with impunity. If you
were his stable companion, for example, you could not try to steal his
food without getting bitten, neither could you nibble the hairs of his
tail without getting kicked. If you were a human being you could not
approach him in his stall until you had spoken to him politely from
outside it. You could not attempt to groom him until you had made friends
with him, and even then you had to keep your eyes open. You got used to
the way he gnashed his teeth and tossed his head about, but occasionally,
when you were occupied with the ticklish under-part of him, he would show
his dislike of the operation by catching you unawares by the slack of
your breeches and throwing you out of his stall.
But there was no vice in him. He was always amenable to kindness, and
prepared to accept gifts of sugar and bread with every symptom of
gratitude and approval. Rumour even had it that he had once eaten the
stable-man’s dinner with apparent relish. And he flourished exceedingly
in his new environment. His baby roundness had disappeared and been
replaced by hard muscle. He no longer moved with an awkward sprawling
gait, but with confidence and precision. His dark-bay coat was sleek
and smooth, his mane hogged, his heels neatly trimmed. Only his tail
remained the difficulty. It was long and its hairs were coarse and curly.
Moreover, he persisted in carrying it slightly inclined towards the off
side, as if to draw attention to it. Frankly it was a vulgar tail. But,
on the whole, Bilfred was presentable.
When the time came to complete his education by putting him in draught
he surprised an expectant crowd of onlookers by going up into his collar
at once and pulling as if he had done that sort of work for years. And
so, as a matter of fact, he had. Irish horses are often put into the
plough as two-year-olds—a fact which had been forgotten. But he would not
consent to go in the wheel. He made this fact quite clear by kicking so
violently that he broke two traces, cut his hocks against the foot-board
and lamed himself. Since ploughs do not run downhill on to one’s heels,
he saw no reason why a gun or wagon should. Persuasion was found to be
useless, and for once his obstinacy triumphed. But he did not abuse his
victory nor seek to extend his gains. He proved himself a willing worker
in any other position, and soon, on his merits as much as on his looks,
he was promoted from the wagon to the gun and definitely took his place
as off leader. It was a good team; some said the show one of the battery.
The wheelers were Beatrice and Belinda, who knew their job as well as did
their driver, whom they justly loved. Being old and dignified they never
fretted, but took life calmly and contentedly. In the centre Bruno and
Binty, young, both of them, and rather excitable, needed watching or they
lost condition, but both had looks. The riding leader was old Bacchus,
tall and strong and honest, a good doer and a veteran of some standing.
Moreover, he was a perfect match for Bilfred. All six of them were of the
same mottled dark-bay colour.
In course of time Bilfred, quick, like most horses, to pick up habits,
exhibited all the characteristics of the typical ‘hairy.’ (It is to be
observed that the term is not one of abuse but of esteem and affection.)
He became frankly and palpably gluttonous, stamping and whinnying for
his food and bolting it ravenously when he got it. At exercise he shied
extravagantly at things which did not frighten him in the least. He
displayed an obstinate disinclination to leave other horses when required
to do so; and at riding drill he quickly discovered that to skimp the
corners as much as possible tends to save exertion. Artillery horses are
not as a rule well bred; one finds in their characters an astonishing
mixture of cunning, vulgarity, and docile good-tempered willingness
which makes them altogether lovable. Their condition reflects their
treatment as in a mirror. Properly looked after they thrive; neglected,
their appearance betrays the fact to every experienced eye. They have
an enormous contempt for ‘these ’ere mufti ’orses,’ as our farrier once
described someone’s private hunter. Watch a subsection out at water when
a contractor’s cart pulls up in the lines; note the way they prick their
ears and stare, then drop their heads to the trough again with a sniff.
It is as if they said in so many words ‘Who the deuce are you? Oh! a mere
civilian!’
Bilfred was like them all in many ways. But, in spite of everything, he
never lost his personality. He invariably kicked three times when he
was first mounted—and never afterwards on that particular day; he hated
motors moving or stationary; and he was an adept at slipping his head
collar and getting loose. It was never safe to let go his head for an
instant. With ears forward and tail straight up on end, he was off in a
flash at a trot that was vulgarly fast. He never galloped till his angry
pursuers were close, and then he could dodge like a Rugby three-quarter.
If he got away in barracks he always made straight for the tennis-lawns,
where his soup-plate feet wrought untold havoc. And no longer was he to
be lured to capture with an empty feed tin. Everybody knew him, most
people cursed him at times, but for all that everybody loved him.
II.
I think that when a new history of the Regiment comes to be written
honourable mention should be made therein of a certain team of dark bays
that pulled the same gun of the same battery for so many years. They
served in England and in Ireland, in France and in the Low Countries;
they thundered over the grassy flats of Salisbury Plain; they toiled
up the steep rocky roads of Glen Imaal; they floundered in the bogs of
Okehampton. They stood exposed in all weathers; they stifled in close
evil-smelling billets, in trains, and on board ship. They were present
at Mons; they were all through the Great Retreat; they swept forward to
the Marne and on to the Aisne; they marched round to Flanders in time
for the first battle of Ypres. They were never sick nor sorry, even when
fodder was short and the marches long, even when there was no time to
slake their raging thirsts. They pulled together in patience and in dumb,
pathetic trust of their lords and masters, knowing nothing, understanding
nothing, until at last Fate overtook them.
At the beginning of August 1914 the battery had just returned to its
station after a month’s hard work at practice camp. Bilfred, a veteran
now of more than seven years’ service, had probably never been in better
condition in his life. Ordinarily he would have been given an easy time
for some weeks, with plenty of food and just enough exercise and collar
work to keep him fit for the strain of the big manœuvres in September.
But there were to be no 1914 manœuvres. About August 6 things quite
beyond Bilfred’s comprehension began to happen. Strange men arrived to
join the battery and in their ignorance took liberties with him which
he resented. Every available space in the lines became crowded with
unkempt, queer-looking horses, obviously of a low caste. Bilfred was shod
a fortnight before his time by a new shoeing-smith, for whom he made
things as unpleasant as possible. His harness, which usually looked like
polished mahogany decorated with silver, was dubbed and oiled until it
looked (and smelt) disgusting. When the battery went out on parade, all
these absurd civilian horses with bushy tails (some even with manes!)
went with it, and for a day or two behaved disgracefully. The whole place
was in confusion and everybody worked all day long. Bilfred, ignorant of
the term ‘mobilisation,’ was completely mystified.
A week or so later he was harnessed up in the middle of the night, hooked
in and marched to the station. Now it had been his habit for years to
object to being entrained. On this occasion he was doubly obstinate and
wasted much precious time. Other horses, even his own team-mates, went
in quietly in front of him; it made no difference, he refused to follow
them. A rope was put round his quarters and he was hauled towards the
truck. He dug his toes in and tried to back. Then, suddenly, his hind
legs slipped and he sat down on his haunches like a dog, tangled in
the rope and unable to move. In the dim light of the station-siding his
white face and scared expression moved us to laughter in spite of our
exasperation. He struggled to his feet again, the cynosure of all eyes,
and the subject of many curses. Then, for no apparent reason whatever, he
changed his mind and allowed himself to be led into the next truck, which
was empty, just as though it was his own stall in barracks. And once
inside he tried by kicking to prevent other horses being put in with him.
He continued in this contrary mood for some time and upheld his
reputation for eccentricity. Some horses made a fuss about embarking.
He made none. He showed his insular contempt for foreigners by making a
frantic effort to bite the first French soldier he saw—a sentry on the
landing quay, who, in his enthusiasm for his Allies, came too close. He
got loose during the night we spent at the rest camp, laid flat about
an acre of standing corn, and was found next morning in the lines of a
cavalry regiment, looking wofully out of place.
On the railway journey up to the concentration area, he slipped down in
the truck several times and was trampled on by the other horses. The
operation of extricating him was dangerous and lengthy. When we detrained
he refused food and water, to our great concern. But he took his place in
the team during the twenty-mile march that followed and was himself again
in the evening.
Where everybody was acutely conscious of the serious nature of the
business during the first day or so, it was something of a relief to
watch the horses behaving exactly as they normally did at home. We,
Heaven help us! knew little enough of what was in store for us, but
they, poor brutes, knew nothing. Oats were plentiful—what else mattered?
Bilfred rolled over and over on his broad back directly his harness
was removed, just as he always did; he plunged his head deep into his
water and pushed his muzzle to and fro washing his mouth and nostrils;
he raised his head when he had drunk, stretched his neck and yawned,
staring vacantly into space as was his wont. For him the world was still
at peace. Of course it was—he knew no better. But we who did, we whose
nerves were on edge with an excitement half-fearful half-exultant, saw
these things and were somehow soothed by them.
Bilfred’s baptism of fire came early. A few rounds of shrapnel burst
over the wagon-line on the very first occasion that we were in action.
Fortunately, the range was just too long and no damage was done. Some of
the horses showed momentary signs of fear, but the drivers easily quieted
them; and, besides, they were in a clover field—an opportunity too good
to be wasted in worrying about strange noises. Bilfred, either because
he despised the German artillery or because he imagined that the reports
were those of his own guns, to which he was quite accustomed, never even
raised his head. His curly tail flapped regularly from side to side,
protecting him from a swarm of flies whilst he reached out as far as his
harness would allow and tore up great mouthfuls of grass. He had always
been a glutton, and it was as if he knew, shells or no shells, that this
was to be his last chance for some time. It was; there followed four days
of desperate strain for man and beast. Through clouds of powdery, choking
dust, beneath a blazing August sun, parched with thirst, often hungry
and always weary, Bilfred and his fellows pulled the two tons of steel
and wood and complicated mechanism called a gun along those straight
interminable roads of northern France. Thousands of horses in dozens of
batteries were doing the same thing—and none knew why.
Then, on the fifth day, our turn came to act as rear-guard artillery. The
horses, tucked away behind a convenient wood when we came into action
just before dawn, had an easy morning—and there were many, especially
amongst the new-comers received on mobilisation, who were badly in need
of it. Now the function of a rear-guard is to gain time, and this we
did. But, when at last the order to withdraw was given, our casualties
were numerous and the enemy was close. Moreover, his artillery had
got our range. The teams issuing from the shelter of their wood had
to face a heavy fire, and it was at this juncture that the seasoned
horses, the real old stagers, who knew as much about limbering up as
most drivers and more than some, set an example to the less experienced
ones. Bilfred (and I take him as typical of the rest) seemed with a
sudden flash of intuition to realise that his apprenticeship and all
his previous training had been arranged expressly that he might bear
himself courageously in just such a situation as this. Somehow, in some
quite inexplicable fashion, he knew that this was the supreme moment of
his career. Regardless of bursting shells and almost without guidance
from his driver he galloped straight for his gun, with ears pricked and
nostrils dilated, the muscles rippling under his dark coat and his traces
taut as bow-strings as he strained at his collar with every thundering
stride. He wheeled with precision exactly over the trail eye, checked
his pace at the right moment, and ‘squared off’ so as to allow the
wheelers to place the limber in position. It was his job, he knew what to
do and he did it perfectly. B was the first gun to get away and the only
one to do so without a casualty....
More marching, more fighting, day after day, night after night; men were
killed and wounded; horses, dropping from utter exhaustion, were cut
loose and left where they lay—old friends, some of them, that it tore
one’s heart to abandon thus. But there could be no tarrying, the enemy
was too close to us for that.
Then came the day when the terrible retreat southwards ceased as abruptly
and as unexpectedly as it had begun. Rejoicing in an advance which soon
developed into a pursuit we forgot our weariness and all the trials and
hardships of the past. And I think we forgot, too, in our eagerness,
that for the horses there was no difference between the advance and the
retirement—the work was as hard, the loads as heavy. For our hopes were
high. We knew that the flood of invasion was stemmed at last. We believed
that final victory was in sight. Reckless of everything we pushed on,
faster and still faster, until our strength was nearly exhausted. It
mattered not, we felt; the enemy retreating in disorder before us must be
in far worse plight.
And then, on the Aisne, we ran up against a strong position, carefully
prepared and held by fresh troops. Trench warfare began, batteries dug
themselves in as never before, and the horses were taken far to the rear
to rest. They had come through a terrible ordeal. Some were lame and some
were galled; staring coats, hollow, wasted backs, and visible ribs told
their own tale. A few, at least, were little more than skeletons for whom
the month’s respite that followed was a godsend. Good forage in plenty,
some grazing and very light work did wonders, and when the moment came
for the move round to Flanders the majority were ready for a renewed
effort. Compared with what they had already done the march was easy work.
They arrived on the Yser fit and healthy.
But the first battle of Ypres took its toll. Bringing up ammunition one
dark night along a road which, though never safe, had perforce to be used
for lack of any other, the teams were caught by a salvo of high explosive
shell and suffered heavily. Four drivers and nine horses were killed,
seven drivers and thirteen horses were wounded. Bilfred escaped unhurt,
but he was the only one in his team who did. A direct hit on the limber
brought instantaneous death to the wheelers and their beloved driver. A
merciful revolver shot put an end to Binty’s screaming agony. Bruno and
Bacchus were fortunate in only getting flesh wounds from splinters. It
was a sad breaking-up of the team which had held together through so many
vicissitudes. It comforted us, though, to think that at least they had
died in harness....
The winter brought hardship for horse as well as man. We built stables
of hop-poles and sacking, but they were only a slight protection against
the biting winds, and it was impossible to cope with the sea of slimy mud
which was euphemistically termed the horse lines. In spite of all our
precautions coughs and colds were rampant. About Christmas-time Bruno,
always rather delicate, succumbed with several others to pneumonia, and
a month later Bacchus strained himself so badly, when struggling to pull
a wagon out of holding mud whilst the rest of the team (all new horses)
jibbed, that he passed out of our hands to a veterinary hospital and was
never seen again. Bilfred alone remained, and Nature, determined to do
her best for him, provided him with the most amazingly woolly coat ever
seen upon a horse. The robustness of his constitution made him impervious
to climatic conditions, but the loss of Bacchus, his companion for so
long, distressed him, and he was at pains to show his dislike of the
substitute provided by biting him at all times except when in harness;
then, and then only, was he Dignity personified.
The end came one day in early spring. The battery was in action in a part
of the line where it was impossible to have the horses far away, for in
those days we had to be prepared for any emergency. It so happened that
the enemy, in the course of his usual morning ‘_strafe_,’ whether by
luck or by intention, put an eight-inch howitzer shell into the middle
of the secluded field where a few of our horses were sunning themselves
in the warm air and picking at the scanty grass. Fortunately, they had
been hobbled so that there was no stampede. The cloud of smoke and dust
cleared away and we thought at first that no harm had been done. Then we
noticed Bilfred lying on his side ten yards or so from the crater, his
hind quarters twitching convulsively. As we went towards him, he lifted
his head and tried to look at the gaping, jagged wound in his flank and
back. There was agony in his soft brown eyes, but he made no sound. He
made a desperate effort to get up, but could only raise his forehand. He
remained thus for a moment, swaying unsteadily and in terrible distress.
Then he dropped back and lay still. A minute later he gave one long deep
sigh—and it was over.
Our old farrier, who in his twenty years’ service had seen many horses
come and go and who was not often given to sentiment, looked at him sadly.
‘’E’s gone,’ he said. ‘A good ’oss—won’t see the like of him again in the
batt’ry this trip, I reckon.’
And Bilfred’s driver, the man who had been with him from the start,
ceased his futile efforts to stem the flow of blood with a dirty
handkerchief.
‘Oh! Gawd!’ he muttered in a voice of despair, and turned his back upon
us all to hide his grief.
We kept a hoof, to be mounted for the battery mess when peace comes, for
he was the last of the old lot and his memory must not be allowed to
fade. The fatigue party digging his grave did not grumble at their task.
He was an older member of the battery than them all and a comrade rather
than a beast of burden.
* * * * *
I like to imagine that Bilfred had a soul—not such a soul as we try to
conceive for ourselves perhaps—but still I like to picture him in some
heaven suitable to his simple needs, dwelling in quiet peacefulness
among the departed of his race. What a company would be his and what
tales he would hear!—Tales of the chariots of Assyria and Rome, of the
fleet Parthians and the ravaging hosts of Attila; stories of Charlemagne
and King Arthur, of the lists and all the pomp of chivalry. And so down
through the centuries to the crossing of the Alps in 1800 and the grim
tragedy of Moscow twelve years later. Would he stamp his feet and toss
his head proudly when he heard of the Greys at Waterloo or the Light
Brigade at Balaclava? But stories of the guns would delight him more, I
think—Fuentes D’Onoro, Maiwand, Néry, and Le Cateau.
It pleases me to think of him meeting Bacchus and Binty and the rest
and arguing out the meaning of it all. Does he know now, I wonder, the
colossal issues that were at stake during that terrible fortnight between
Mons and the Marne, and does he forgive us our seeming cruelty?
I hope so. I like to think that Bilfred understands.
_THE SPIRIT OF FRANCE._
BY LIEUT. F. J. SALMON.
We had been away from our area for several days on a special mission
and were the guests of the French Staff at X. The programme for the day
included a visit to an observation post, the exact position of which was
not known to our guide, and it was necessary to call at a French battery
and pick up someone to show us the way. A very cheering description
of the situation at Verdun by an officer who had just come from there
had kept us rather later than usual at lunch, a fact to which we owed
our escape from a very unpleasant bit of ‘strafing.’ We had still some
200 yards to go to reach the battery when the Huns started shelling it
furiously. A few ‘overs’ came within about 100 yards of us and there was
rather an unpleasant whirr of splinters, so we took refuge behind a house.
The crash of the first salvo had aroused a good woman and her baby and
she came out, smiling, to see what was happening. Carrying the baby, she
went out into the road and stood in the line of fire watching the fun.
She occasionally dodged back behind the wall when the bits flew too near,
just as a child would run from a snowball. She said her man was in the
‘Chasseurs Alpins’ and had been in the Vosges since the beginning—he was
not afraid of the Boches, why should she be? A French ‘poilu’ passing by
scolded her for exposing the child and she disappeared.
After five minutes of hot shelling the Huns stopped, and Lieutenant M.,
our guide, proposed that we should continue. The Hun usually caters for
those people who ‘carry on’ at once, so we decided to visit a friend
whose office was only two doors off. Lieutenant R. was delighted to see
us. Yes, this particular Boche battery was ‘dégoûtant.’ It fired like
a mitrailleuse, yes, and some of the ‘overs’ came this way. He had the
honour to announce to us that ‘there was an unexploded 77-shell in his
ceiling—no, it had not been there long and was probably still warm.’ Two
more rounds battery fire then came over and we judged the trouble past
for the time being. When we reached the battery we found they had had a
bad time. It was an old territorial field battery—there was probably not
a gunner less than forty in it. One of the guns had had a direct hit.
The wheel and part of the carriage were smashed. Two of the other gun
emplacements had been knocked in. The German battery responsible for this
had been located, and the bearded old Frenchmen were getting ready for
retaliation. Three of the guns were already ready for action, and efforts
were being made to heave the broken one up on to a temporary carriage so
that at least one more shot might be got out of it! A telephone message
had been sent up from the brigade asking them to have a guide ready for
us, but the matter had been forgotten. There was far more excitement
about this than about the bombardment. Lieutenant M. called up the
Sergeant-Major and ‘strafed’ him unmercifully. The Sergeant-Major was
‘désolé,’ but at the moment he had been ‘très occupé.’ He was ‘confus’
and would ‘mon capitaine’ accept his apology—the ‘cochons de Bosches’
were far more responsible than he was. Lieutenant M. said it was all
right, called him ‘mon vieux,’ and we departed for our post with a fit-up
guide who persisted that he did not know the way, but who nevertheless
got us there in the end and we had a good look at the enemy lines and the
country beyond. On our return we passed a small cottage which had been
hit by something big. More than half of it had been blown away and there
was no roof left at all. The chimney, however, was still there and it
poured forth a defiant stream of smoke as the owner cooked his dinner in
a temporary shelter near the fireplace.
The French Headquarters mess was more than usually cheery that evening.
The enemy had had another setback at Verdun.
The British, too, were going to take over more line from the French,
and this brought the subject round to Great Britain and what she was
doing in the war. This was a point I should have preferred to have
left undiscussed at a time when the French were engaged in perhaps the
greatest struggle in the war with, apparently, no direct assistance from
us. Our hosts, however, insisted that, under the circumstances, we were
doing a good deal more than could be expected of us. They were unanimous
that the most remarkable achievement of this greatest of all wars was the
raising of our large Imperial army. It was one thing to make good use of
a working organisation as the Germans had, but, as staff officers, they
would have believed it impossible for any country to have done what we
have done. Each one was able to show the insuperable difficulties that
would have arisen in his own department, and there was nothing one could
do but bow and agree with them.
Next morning we were off again on our rounds, this time with a different
guide, Captain R.
We had a good view of the enemy’s lines from what had once been a child’s
nursery. Poor kid! if she could see her playroom now! On the floor were
a dismembered doll and part of a brick puzzle. The only furniture was a
broken chair by the window and a toy cot in the corner of the room; the
rest had been taken for some neighbouring billet. Near the window was a
field telephone, and, on the wall near by, some printed instructions to
artillery observers. The walls were decorated with numerous sketches,
some of them quite well done, of French artillerymen and famous generals.
A large hole in the wall and the familiar sickly smell of ‘tear shell’
showed that the enemy had detected the post and that it was no place to
loiter in.
After seeing many interesting things that one cannot write about we
reached one of the big ruined towns near the line, where we were
entertained to lunch by two French officers. This lunch was one of the
most memorable of my experiences at the front.
These officers, being engaged on very special and important work, were
_persona grata_ in the town and had a free hand in the matter of billets.
At the time of our visit they were living in a house that might have been
in Park Lane. A marble hall and staircase, luxuriously furnished rooms
and all modern appointments—central heating, electric light, electric
bells. The dining-room had every aspect of peace, wealth, and comfort.
The table linen and service were of the best. The captain’s servant had
evidently been a _chef_ in private life. There were four courses and a
variety of the best wines. All this was within less than a mile of the
German front line, a fact which it would have been impossible to realise
had it not been for the occasional desultory crack of a rifle and the
regular crash and swirl of the French batteries firing over our heads!
Our hosts were excellent fellows, as amusing and full of ‘esprit’ as
only the French can be. They had been in the town over a year and had
been shelled out of two other billets. They showed us the remains of
their last home which had been even more luxurious than the present one.
One could only gather some vague idea of what it had been like from the
carved oak mantel-piece showing over a pile of débris at the end of the
drawing-room and the torn tapestry hanging from the walls. They had
taken to the cellar just in time!
Experience had taught our friends to gauge the Hun’s intentions to a
nicety. A shell would pass close to the house and burst on the other
side of the road. ‘That’s all right—only a short one for such and such a
public building.’ The Frenchmen put another tune on the gramophone and
the next ‘marmite’ goes several streets away. On another occasion a heavy
shell is heard coming over from another direction. It explodes with a
resounding ‘crump’ a long way down the street. That comes from one of
the batteries that shell this part of the town and our two officers have
their coffee served in the cellar!
This knowing when to take to the cellar is a distinct characteristic of
the French. They are not for taking any unnecessary risks as some of us
are, but, when a dangerous job has to be done, they will go about it
with a careless gaiety that is wholly unforced. It is this spirit which
is holding up the French soldier to the admiration of the whole world;
the spirit that has kept the German hordes out of Verdun, and that will
continue to keep them at bay till the time is ripe for a concerted effort
of the allied forces.
_A WAR SAVING WORTH MAKING._
In theory we are all on saving bent just now, for it is only by saving
that many of us can do anything towards winning the great fight; and
that each one of us must do something, everyone agrees. Unfortunately,
in practice, to us as a nation saving does not come easily: we have not
the instinct to save. We know no more, indeed, than sparrows, of the
art of making sixpence do the work of a shilling. Quite a fair number
of the petty economies we pride ourselves on having effected, of late,
are ending in something nearly akin to waste. Evidently we shall have to
learn from other nations, nations more thrifty than ourselves, if we are
ever to do anything really worth doing in the way of saving. And there
is hardly a nation in Europe from which we might not learn if we would.
The Germans are experts in all that concerns economy: were it otherwise
the war would be nearer its end than it is. The Austrians, too, although
by nature as wasteful as we are, have been driven by lack of means into
cunning devices for making money go far. These are enemy nations, it is
true; still, that is no reason, surely, why we should not learn from
them, even though we may not buy with them, sell with them, or even talk.
Quite recently the Relief Committee in Strassburg issued a most
instructive public notice. It is an appeal to parents to show their
patriotism, as well as their thrift and care for public health, by seeing
to it that their children go barefoot this summer. ‘By economising
in boots you save leather, and thus render valuable service to your
country,’ they are informed.
Now if our School Authorities could be induced to issue some such notice
as this, and to address it imperatively to parents of all classes alike,
not only would much leather be saved, and with it much money, but many
poor little children would have a much better chance than they have, of
living and thriving, while many poor mothers would be able to face the
world more cheerily. It is safer by far to go barefoot, as everyone who
has ever tried it knows, than to wear shoes unless they be good; and in
normal times, for every child who wears good shoes, shoes into which
water cannot make its way, there are legions who wear shoes that leak,
that have gaps through which toes poke out, soles that serve no purpose.
And the end of this is wet stockings, entailing coughs and colds,
croup, and even pneumonia. Really good shoes are expensive, it must be
remembered: to keep a family of sturdy, active youngsters well shod costs
more than to keep them well dressed. ‘We should get along fine if it was
not for the shoes,’ I am always being told by working-class mothers.
‘It’s the shoes that take all the money.’
‘Not a week goes by but there’s mending to be done, even if there’s no
shoes to be bought,’ a very trustworthy woman assures me. ‘Blakies, it’s
true, are a help; but one must have something to fasten them on to.’
‘It’s just heart-breaking work trying to keep them all dry-shod,’ a
mother of five children declares. ‘They have always, one or other of
them, their toes or heels sticking out.’
‘One might think lads had hoofs instead of feet from the way their shoes
go,’ another mother once informed me. ‘These were new a fortnight ago,
and just see! There’s hardly a bit of sole left.’ Tears came into her
eyes as she held the shoes up for me to look at.
Among the respectable poor, not only of the hand-working class, but of
the lower-middle class, and this is the poorer of the two in these war
days, the great trouble in life is the finding of shoes, the hopeless
struggle to keep children’s feet well covered. Year by year, in every
town in England, women are worried into their graves, because, let them
do what they will, one pair of shoes wears out before they have the
wherewithal to buy another. In every town, too, women lose their health
and strength because, when they ought to be asleep, they will persist in
working, that they may have the money to pay the cobbler. To see their
boys and girls going about without even a patch to hide the holes in
their shoes, seems to be more than most mothers can bear. And the saddest
part of the business is they are sacrificing themselves quite uselessly,
to a mere fetish. For very few of them have any thought of hygiene in
their heads, when they toil and moil, pinch and save, that their children
may have shoes: their thought is all of respectability. They are firmly
convinced that to let them go barefoot would be to rob them of all claim
to rank with the respectable, would be to dub them little ragamuffins in
fact, and thus render them pariahs. And better than that work all night,
no matter what it may lead to.
If these mothers were forced to let their children go barefoot, things
would of course be otherwise; and they would be forced, practically,
were they called upon to do so for patriotism’s sake, for the sake of
saving leather that the soldiers might have plenty of good shoes. There
would be no loss of caste then in banishing shoes and stockings; on
the contrary, it would be the correct thing to do, the ‘just so’; and
they would do it right gladly, thankful that they could do it without
exciting comment. And by doing it, they would both lighten immeasurably
the heavy burden they themselves bear, and add to their children’s chance
of developing into sturdy men and women, men and women able to do good
work for their country, securing for themselves a fair share of life’s
comfort and pleasure the while. For there is proof and to spare that
boys and girls alike are better off all round, stronger, more vigorous,
more active, without shoes than with them, unless the shoes be of better
quality than those most of the respectable poor can afford to buy. Never
would the Strassburg Committee have ventured to call upon parents to
let their offspring go barefoot had they not known that, even so far as
health was concerned, quite apart from the saving of leather, good, not
harm, would result. For in Germany, whoever else may go on short commons,
children, the Fatherland’s future defenders, are always well cared for.
One of the reasons, indeed, that the Committee give for issuing their
notice is that going barefoot is not only economical, and therefore, as
things are, patriotic, but also hygienic. And that it is, most of us can
see for ourselves.