II

She thought that text the _worst_ in the Bible. Huxley thought it the

_best_. Huxley was, as everybody knows, the Prince of Agnostics. We need

not stop to ask why. Nobody who has read the story of John Stuart Mill's

boyhood will wonder that Mill was a skeptic. And nobody who has read the

story of Thomas Huxley's boyhood will wonder at his becoming an

agnostic. As Edward Clodd, his biographer, says, 'his boyhood was a

cheerless time. Reversing Matthew Arnold's sunnier memories:

No rigorous teachers seized his youth,

And purged its faith and tried its fire,

Shewed him the high, white star of truth,

There bade him gaze, and there aspire.

'He told Charles Kingsley that he was "kicked into the world, a boy

without guide or training, or with worse than none"; he "had two years

of a pandemonium of a school, and, after that, neither help nor sympathy

in any intellectual direction till he reached manhood."' And, even then,

as those familiar with his biography know, he had little enough.

What would Huxley have been, I wonder, if the sympathy for which he

hungered had been extended to him? If, instead of badgering him with

arguments and entangling him in controversy, Mr. Gladstone and Bishop

Wilberforce and others had honestly attempted to see things through his

spectacles! Huxley was said to be as cold as ice and as inflexible as

steel; but I doubt it. In his life-story I find two incidents--one

belonging to his early manhood and one belonging to his age--which tell

a very different tale.

The _first_ is connected with the birth of his boy. It is the last night

of the Old Year, and he is waiting to hear that he is a father. He

spends the anxious hour in framing a resolution. In his diary he pledges

himself 'to smite all humbugs, however big; to give a nobler tone to

science; to set an example of abstinence from petty personal

controversies and of toleration for everything but lying; to be

indifferent as to whether the work is recognized as mine or not, so long

as it is done. It is half-past ten at night. Waiting for my child. I

seem to fancy it the pledge that all these things shall be.' And the

next entry runs:

'_New Year's Day, 1859._ Born five minutes before twelve. Thank God!'

Mark that '_Thank God!_' and then note what follows. A year or two

later, when the child is snatched from him, he makes this entry and then

closes the journal for ever. He has no heart to keep a diary afterwards.

'Our Noel, our firstborn, after being for nearly four years our delight

and our joy, was carried off by scarlet fever in forty-eight hours. This

day week he and I had a great romp together. On Friday his restless

head, with its bright blue eyes and tangled golden hair, tossed all day

upon the pillow. On Saturday night I carried his cold, still body here

into my study. Here, too, on Sunday night, came his mother and I to that

holy leavetaking. My boy is gone; but in a higher and better sense than

was in my mind when, four years ago, I wrote what stands above, I feel

that my fancy has been fulfilled. I say heartily and without

bitterness--Amen, so let it be!'

'_Thank God!_' exclaims our great Agnostic when the child is born.

'_Amen!_' he says, submissively, when the little one is buried.

This is the _first_ of the two incidents. The _second_--which is no less

pathetic--is recorded by Dr. Douglas Adam. 'A friend of mine,' the

doctor says, 'was acting on a Royal Commission of which Professor Huxley

was a member, and one Sunday they were staying together in a little

country town. "I suppose you are going to church," said Huxley. "Yes,"

replied my friend. "What if, instead, you stayed at home and talked to

me of religion?" "No," was the reply, "for I am not clever enough to

refute your arguments." "But what if you simply told me your own

experience--what religion has done for you?" My friend did not go to

church that morning; he stayed at home and told Huxley the story of all

that Christ had been to him; and presently there were tears in the eyes

of the great agnostic as he said, "_I would give my right hand if I

could believe that!_"'

This, if you please, is the man who was supposed to be as cold as ice

and as inflexible as steel! This is the man for whom the Christians of

his time had nothing better than harsh judgments, freezing sarcasms and

windy arguments! How little we know of each other! How slow we are to

understand!

A Handful of Stars: Texts That Have Moved Great Minds · 第 88 / 156 题