None of Herbert's English poems was published during his lifetime. On

his death-bed he gave to Nicholas Ferrar a manuscript with the title

_The Temple: Sacred Poems and Private Ejaculations_. This was published

at Cambridge, apparently for private circulation, almost immediately

after Herbert's death, and a second imprint followed in the same year.

On the title-page of both is the quotation "In his Temple doth every man

speak of his honour." _The Temple_ is a collection of religious poems

connected by unity of sentiment and inspiration. Herbert tried to

interpret his own devout meditations by applying images of all kinds to

the ritual and beliefs of the Church. Nothing in his own church at

Bemerton was too commonplace to serve as a starting-point for the

epigrammatic expression of his piety. The church key reminds him that

"it is my sin that locks his handes," and the stones of the floor are

patience and humility, while the cement that binds them together is love

and charity. The chief faults of the book are obscurity, verbal conceits

and a forced ingenuity which shows itself in grotesque puns, odd metres

and occasional want of taste. But the quaint beauty of Herbert's style

and its musical quality give _The Temple_ a high place. "The Church

Porch," "The Agony," "Sin," "Sunday," "Virtue," "Man," "The British

Church," "The Quip," "The Collar," "The Pulley," "The Flower," "Aaron"

and "The Elixir" are among the best known of these poems. Herbert and

Keble are the poets of Anglican theology. No book is fuller of devotion

to the Church of England than _The Temple_, and no poems in our language

exhibit more of the spirit of true Christianity. Every page is marked by

transparent sincerity, and reflects the beautiful character of "holy

George Herbert."

Nicholas Ferrar's translation (Oxford, 1638) of the _Hundred and Ten

Considerations ..._ of Juan de Valdes contained a letter and notes by

Herbert. In 1652 appeared _Herbert's Remains; or, Sundry Pieces of

that Sweet Singer of the Temple, Mr George Herbert_. This included _A

Priest to the Temple; or, The Country Parson, his Character, and Rule

of Holy Life_, in prose; _Jacula prudentum_, a collection of proverbs

with a separate title-page dated 1651, which had appeared in a shorter

form as _Outlandish Proverbs_ in 1640; and some miscellaneous matter.

The completest edition of his works is that by Dr A. B. Grosart in

1874, this edition of the Poetical works being reproduced in the

"Aldine edition" in 1876. _The English Works of George Herbert ..._ (3

vols., 1905) were edited in much detail by G. H. Palmer. A

contemporary account of Herbert's life by Barnabas Oley was prefixed

to the _Remains_ of 1652, but the classic authority is Izaak Walton's

_Life of Mr George Herbert_, published in 1670, with some letters from

Herbert to his mother. See also A. G. Hyde, _George Herbert and his

Times_ (1907), and the "Oxford" edition of his poems by A. Waugh

(1908).

FOOTNOTE:

[1] Printed in 1662 as an appendix to J. Vivian's _Ecclesiastes

Solomonis_.

HERBERT, HENRY WILLIAM ["Frank Forester"] (1807-1858), English novelist

and writer on sport, son of the Hon. and Rev. William Herbert, dean of

Manchester, a son of the first earl of Carnarvon, was born in London on

the 3rd of April 1807. He was educated at Eton and at Caius College,

Cambridge, where he graduated B.A. in 1830. Having become involved in

debt, he emigrated to America, and from 1831 to 1839 was teacher of

Greek in a private school in New York. In 1833 he started the _American

Monthly Magazine_, which he edited, in conjunction with A. D. Patterson,

till 1835. In 1834 he published his first novel, _The Brothers: a Tale

of the Fronde_, which was followed by a number of others which obtained

a certain degree of popularity. He also wrote a series of historical

studies, including _The Cavaliers of England_ (1852), _The Knights of

England, France and Scotland_ (1852), _The Chevaliers of France_ (1853),

and _The Captains of the Old World_ (1851); but he is best known for his

works on sport, published under the pseudonym of "Frank Forester." These

include _The Field Sports of the United States and British Provinces_

(1849), _Frank Forester and his Friends_ (1849), _The Fish and Fishing

of the United States_ (1850), _The Young Sportsman's Complete Manual_

(1852), and _The Horse and Horsemanship in the United States and British

Provinces of North America_ (1858). He also translated many of the

novels of Eugene Sue and Alexandre Dumas. Herbert was a man of varied

accomplishments, but of somewhat dissipated habits. He died by his own

hand in New York on the 17th of May 1858.

HERBERT, SIR THOMAS (1606-1682), English traveller and author, was born

at York in 1606. Several of his ancestors were aldermen and merchants in

that city--e.g. his grandfather and benefactor, Alderman Herbert (d.

1614)--and they traced a connexion with the earls of Pembroke. Thomas

became a commoner of Jesus College, Oxford, in 1621, but afterwards

removed to Cambridge, through the influence of his uncle Dr Ambrose

Akroyd. In 1627 the earl of Pembroke procured his appointment in the

suite of Sir Dodmore Cotton, then starting as ambassador for Persia with

Sir Robert Shirley. Sailing in March they visited the Cape, Madagascar,

Goa and Surat; landing at Gambrun (10th of January 1627-1628), they

travelled inland to Ashraf and thence to Kazvin, where both Cotton and

Shirley died, and whence Herbert made extensive travels in the Persian

_Hinterland_, visiting Kashan, Bagdad, &c. On his return voyage he

touched at Ceylon, the Coromandel coast, Mauritius and St Helena. He

reached England in 1629, travelled in Europe in 1630-1631, married in

1632 and retired from court in 1634 (his prospects perhaps blighted by

Pembroke's death in 1630); after this he resided on his Tintern estate

and elsewhere till the Civil War, siding with the parliament till his

appointment to attend on the king in 1646. Becoming a devoted royalist,

he was rewarded with a baronetcy at the Restoration (1660). He resided

mainly in York Street, Westminster, till the Great Plague (1666), when

he retired to York, where he died (at Petergate House) on the 1st of

March 1682.

Herbert's chief work is the _Description of the Persian Monarchy now

beinge: the Orientall Indyes, Iles and other parts of the Greater Asia

and Africk_ (1634), reissued with additions, &c., in 1638 as _Some

Yeares Travels into Africa and Asia the Great_ (al. _into divers parts

of Asia and Afrique_); a third edition followed in 1664, and a fourth

in 1677. This is one of the best records of 17th-century travel. Among

its illustrations are remarkable sketches of the dodo, cuneiform

inscriptions and Persepolis. Herbert's _Threnodia Carolina; or,

Memoirs of the two last years of the reign of that unparallell'd

prince of ever blessed memory King Charles I._, was in great part

printed at the author's request in Wood's _Athenae Oxonienses_; in

full by Dr C. Goodall in his _Collection of Tracts_ (1702, repr. G. &

W. Nicol, 1813). Sir William Dugdale is understood to have received

assistance from Herbert in the _Monasticon Anglicanum_, vol. iv.; see

two of Herbert's papers on St John's, Beverley and Ripon collegiate

church, now cathedral, in Drake's _Eboracum_ (appendix). Cf. also

Robert Davies' account of Herbert in _The Yorkshire Archaeological and

Topographical Journal_, part iii., pp. 182-214 (1870), containing a

facsimile of the inscription on Herbert's tomb; Wood's _Athenae_, iv.

15-41; and _Fasti_, ii. 26, 131, 138, 143-144, 150.

HERBERT OF CHERBURY, EDWARD HERBERT, BARON (1583-1648), English soldier,

diplomatist, historian and religious philosopher, eldest son of Richard

Herbert of Montgomery Castle (a member of a collateral branch of the

family of the earls of Pembroke) and of Magdalen, daughter of Sir

Richard Newport, was born at Eyton-on-Severn near Wroxeter on the 3rd of

March 1583. After careful private tuition he matriculated at University

College, Oxford, as a gentleman commoner, in May 1596. On the 28th of

February 1599 he married his cousin Mary, daughter and heiress of Sir

William Herbert (d. 1593). He returned to Oxford with his wife and

mother, continued his studies, and obtained proficiency in modern

languages as well as in music, riding and fencing. On the accession of

James I. he presented himself at court and was created a knight of the

Bath on the 24th of July 1603. In 1608 he went to Paris, enjoying the

friendship and hospitality of the old constable de Montmorency, and

being entertained by Henry IV. On his return, as he says himself with

naive vanity, he was "in great esteem both in court and city, many of

the greatest desiring my company." In 1610 he served as a volunteer in

the Low Countries under the prince of Orange, whose intimate friend he

became, and distinguished himself at the capture of Juliers from the

emperor. He offered to decide the war by engaging in single combat with

a champion chosen from among the enemy, but his challenge was declined.

During an interval in the fighting he paid a visit to Spinola, in the

Spanish camp near Wezel, and afterwards to the elector palatine at

Heidelberg, subsequently travelling in Italy. At the instance of the

duke of Savoy he led an expedition of 4000 Huguenots from Languedoc into

Piedmont to help the Savoyards against Spain, but after nearly losing

his life in the journey to Lyons he was imprisoned on his arrival there,

and the enterprise came to nothing. Thence he returned to the

Netherlands and the prince of Orange, arriving in England in 1617. In

1619 he was made by Buckingham ambassador at Paris, but a quarrel with

de Luynes and a challenge sent by him to the latter occasioned his

recall in 1621. After the death of de Luynes Herbert resumed his post in

February 1622. He was very popular at the French court and showed

considerable diplomatic ability, his chief objects being to accomplish

the union between Charles and Henrietta Maria and secure the assistance

of Louis XIII. for the unfortunate elector palatine. This latter

advantage he could not obtain, and he was dismissed in April 1624. He

returned home greatly in debt and received little reward for his

services beyond the Irish peerage of Castle island in 1624 and the

English barony of Cherbury, or Chirbury, on the 7th of May 1629. In 1632

he was appointed a member of the council of war. He attended the king at

York in 1639, and in May 1642 was imprisoned by the parliament for

urging the addition of the words "without cause" to the resolution that

the king violated his oath by making war on parliament. He determined

after this to take no further part in the struggle, retired to

Montgomery Castle, and declined the king's summons. On the 5th of

September 1644 he surrendered the castle to the parliamentary forces,

returned to London, submitted, and was granted a pension of L20 a week.

In 1647 he paid a visit to Gassendi at Paris, and died in London on the

20th of August, 1648, being buried in the church of St Giles's in the

Fields.

Lord Herbert left two sons, Richard (c. 1600-1655), who succeeded him as

2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury, and Edward, the title becoming extinct in

the person of Henry Herbert, the 4th baron, grandson of the 1st Lord

Herbert in 1691. In 1694, however, it was revived in favour of Henry

Herbert (1654-1709), son of Sir Henry Herbert (1595-1673), brother of

the 1st Lord Herbert of Cherbury. Sir Henry was master of the revels to

Charles I. and Charles II., being busily employed in reading and

licensing plays and in supervising all kinds of public entertainments.

He died in April 1673; his son Henry died in January 1709, when the

latter's son Henry became 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury of the second

creation. He died without issue in April 1738, and again the barony

became extinct. In 1743 it was revived for Henry Arthur Herbert (c.

1703-1772), who five years later was created earl of Powis. This

nobleman was a great-grandson of the 2nd Lord Herbert of Cherbury of the

first creation, and since his time the barony has been held by the earls

of Powis.

Lord Herbert's cousin, Sir Edward Herbert (c. 1591-1657), was a member

of parliament under James I. and Charles I. Having become

attorney-general he was instructed by Charles to take proceedings

against some members of parliament who had been concerned in the passing

of the Grand Remonstrance; the only result, however, was Herbert's own

impeachment by the House of Commons and his imprisonment. Later in life

he was with the exiled royal family in Holland and in France, becoming

lord keeper of the great seal to Charles II., an office which he had

refused in 1645. He died in Paris in December 1657. One of Herbert's son

was Arthur Herbert, earl of Torrington, and another was Sir Edward

Herbert (c. 1648-1698), titular earl of Portland, who was made chief

justice of the king's bench in 1685 in succession to Lord Jeffreys. It

was Sir Edward who declared for the royal prerogative in the case of

_Godden_ v. _Hales_, asserting that the kings of England, being

sovereign princes, could dispense with particular laws in particular

cases. After the escape of James II. to France this king made Herbert

his lord chancellor and created him earl of Portland, although he was a

Protestant and had exhibited a certain amount of independence during

1687.

The first Lord Herbert's real claim to fame and remembrance is derived

from his writings. Herbert's first and most important work is the _De

veritate prout distinguitur a revelatione, a verisimili, a possibili,

et a falso_ (Paris, 1624; London, 1633; translated into French 1639,

but never into English; a MS. in add. MSS. 7081. Another, Sloane MSS.

3957, has the author's dedication to his brother George in his own

hand, dated 1622). It combines a theory of knowledge with a partial

psychology, a methodology for the investigation of truth, and a scheme

of natural religion. The author's method is prolix and often far from

clear; the book is no compact system, but it contains the skeleton and

much of the soul of a complete philosophy. Giving up all past theories

as useless, Herbert professedly endeavours to constitute a new and

true system. Truth, which he defines as a just conformation of the

faculties with one another and with their objects, he distributed into

four classes or stages: (1) truth in the thing or the truth of the

object; (2) truth of the appearance; (3) truth of the apprehension

(_conceptus_); (4) truth of the intellect. The faculties of the mind

are as numerous as the differences of their objects, and are

accordingly innumerable; but they may be arranged in four groups. The

first and fundamental and most certain group is the _Natural

Instinct_, to which belong the [Greek: koinai ennoiai], the _notitiae

communes_, which are innate, of divine origin and indisputable. The

second group, the next in certainty, is the _sensus internus_ (under

which head Herbert discusses amongst others love, hate, fear,

conscience with its _communis notitia_, and free will); the third is

the _sensus externus_; and the fourth is _discursus_, reasoning, to

which, as being the least certain, we have recourse when the other

faculties fail. The ratiocinative faculties proceed by division and

analysis, by questioning, and are slow and gradual in their movement;

they take aid from the other faculties, those of the _instinctus

naturalis_ being always the final test. Herbert's categories or

questions to be used in investigation are ten in number whether (a

thing is), what, of what sort, how much, in what relation, how, when,

where, whence, wherefore. No faculty, rightly used, can err "even in

dreams"; badly exercised, reasoning becomes the source of almost all

our errors. The discussion of the _notitiae communes_ is the most

characteristic part of the book. The exposition of them, though highly

dogmatic, is at times strikingly Kantian in substance. "So far are

these elements or sacred principles from being derived from experience

or observation that without some of them, or at least some one of

them, we can neither experience nor even observe." Unless we felt

driven by them to explore the nature of things, "it would never occur

to us to distinguish one thing from another." It cannot be said that

Herbert proves the existence of the common notions; he does not deduce

them or even give any list of them. But each faculty has its common

notion; and they may be distinguished by six marks, their _priority_,

_independence_, _universality_, _certainty_, _necessity_ (for the

well-being of man), and _immediacy_. Law is based on certain _common

notions_; so is religion. Though Herbert expressly defines the scope

of his book as dealing with the intellect, not faith, it is the common

notions of religion he has illustrated most fully; and it is plain

that it is in this part of his system that he is chiefly interested.

The common notions of religion are the famous five articles, which

became the charter of the English deists (see DEISM). There is little

polemic against the received form of Christianity, but Herbert's

attitude towards the Church's doctrine is distinctly negative, and he

denies revelation except to the individual soul. In the _De religione

gentilium_ (completed 1645, published Amsterdam, 1663, translated into

English by W. Lewis, London, 1705) he gives what may be called, in

Hume's words, "a natural history of religion." By examining the

heathen religions Herbert finds, to his great delight, the

universality of his five great articles, and that these are clearly

recognizable under their absurdities as they are under the rites,

ceremonies and polytheism invented by sacerdotal superstition. The

same vein is maintained in the tracts _De causis errorum_, an

unfinished work on logical fallacies, _Religio laici_, and _Ad

sacerdotes de religione laici_ (1645). In the _De veritate_ Herbert

produced the first purely metaphysical treatise written by an

Englishman, and in the _De religione gentilium_ one of the earliest

studies extant in comparative theology; while both his metaphysical

speculations and his religious views are throughout distinguished by

the highest originality and provoked considerable controversy. His

achievements in historical writing are vastly inferior, and vitiated

by personal aims and his preoccupation to gain the royal favour.

Herbert's first historical work is the _Expeditio Buckinghami ducis_

(published in a Latin translation in 1656 and in the original English

by the earl of Powis for the Philobiblon Society in 1860), a defence

of Buckingham's conduct of the ill-fated expedition of 1627. _The Life

and Raigne of King Henry VIII._ (1649) derives its chief value from

its composition from original documents, but is ill-proportioned, and

the author judges the character and statesmanship of Henry with too

obvious a partiality.

His poems, published in 1665 (reprinted and edited by J. Churton

Collins in 1881), show him in general a faithful disciple of Donne,

obscure and uncouth. His satires are miserable compositions, but a few

of his lyrical verses show power of reflection and true inspiration,

while his use of the metre afterwards employed by Tennyson in his "In

Memoriam" is particularly happy and effective. His Latin poems are

evidence of his scholarship. Three of these had appeared together with

the _De causis errorum_ in 1645. To these works must be added _A

Dialogue between a Tutor and a Pupil_ (1768; a treatise on education,

MS. in the Bodleian Library); a treatise on the king's supremacy in

the Church (MS. in the Record Office and at Queen's College, Oxford),

and his well-known autobiography, first published by Horace Walpole in

1764, a naive and amusing narrative, too much occupied, however, with

his duels and amorous adventures, to the exclusion of more creditable

incidents in his career, such as his contributions to philosophy and

history, his intimacy with Donne, Ben Jonson, Selden and Carew,

Casaubon, Gassendi and Grotius, or his embassy in France, in relation

to which he only described the splendour of his retinue and his social

triumphs.

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--The autobiography edited by Sidney Lee with

correspondence from add. MSS. 7082 (1886); article in the _Dict. of

Nat. Biog._ by the same writer and the list of authorities there

collated; _Hist. MSS. Comm. Rep._ x. app. iv., 378; _Lord Herbert de

Cherbury_, by Charles de Remusat (1874); _Eduard, Lord Herbert von

Cherbury_, by C. Guttler (a criticism of his philosophy; 1897);

_Collections Historical and Archaeological_ relating to

Montgomeryshire, vols. vii., xi., xx.; R. Warner's _Epistolary

Curiosities_, i. ser.; Reid's works, edited by Sir William Hamilton;

_National Review_, xxxv. 661 (Leslie Stephen); Locke's _Essay on Human

Understanding_; Wood, _Ath. Oxon._ (Bliss), iii. 239; _Gentleman's

Magazine_ (1816), i. 201 (print of remains of his birthplace); _Lord

Herbert's Poems_, ed. by J. Churton Collins (1881); Aubrey's _Lives of

Eminent Men_; also works quoted under DEISM.

HERBERT OF LEA, SIDNEY HERBERT, 1ST BARON (1810-1861), English

statesman, was the younger son of the 11th earl of Pembroke. Educated at

Harrow and Oriel, Oxford, he made a reputation at the Oxford Union as a

speaker, and entered the House of Commons as Conservative member for a

division of Wiltshire in 1832. Under Peel he held minor offices, and in

1845 was included in the cabinet as secretary at war, and again held

this office in 1852-1855, being responsible for the War Office during

the Crimean difficulties, and in 1859. It was Sidney Herbert who sent

Florence Nightingale out to the Crimea, and he led the movement for War

Office reform after the war, the hard work entailed causing his

breakdown in health, so that in July 1861, having been created a baron,

he had to resign office, and died on the 2nd of August 1861. His statue

was placed in front of the War Office in Pall Mall. He was succeeded in

the title by his eldest son, who later became 13th earl of Pembroke, and

the barony is now merged in that earldom; his second son became 14th

earl. Another son, the Hon. Michael Herbert (1857-1904), was British

Ambassador at Washington in succession to Lord Pauncefote.

A life of Lord Herbert by Lord Stanmore was published in 1906.

HERBERTON, a mining town of Cardwell county, Queensland, Australia, 55

m. S.W. of Cairns. Pop. (1901) 2806. Tin was discovered in the locality

in 1879, and to this mineral the town chiefly owes its prosperity,

though copper, bismuth and some silver and gold are also found.

Atherton, 12 m. from the town, is served by rail from Cairns, which is

the port for the Herberton district.

HERCULANEUM, an ancient city of Italy, situated about two-thirds of a

mile from the Portici station of the railway from Naples to Pompeii. The

ruins are less frequently visited than those of Pompeii, not only

because they are smaller in extent and of less obvious interest, but

also because they are more difficult of access. The history of their

discovery and exploration, and the artistic and literary relics which

they have yielded, are worthy, however, of particular notice. The small

part of the city, which was investigated at the spot called _Gli scavi

nuovi_ (the new excavations) was discovered in the 19th century. But the

more important works were executed in the 18th century; and of the

buildings then explored at a great depth, by means of tunnels, none is

visible except the theatre, the orchestra of which lies 85 ft. below the

surface.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Helmont, Jean" to "Hernosand" Volume 13, Slice 3 · 第 32 / 45 段