OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES

The disposition of those who apprehend this outline of history that

modern science has made plain to us, and who see all life as a system

of progressive change, is by no means antagonistic to religion. They

realise the immense importance and the profound necessity of religion

in this last great chapter of the story, the evolution of human

society. But they see religion within the frame of fact; they do not,

like Mr. Belloc, look through religion at fact. Man has accommodated

his originally fierce and narrow egotism to the needs of an ever wider

and more co-operative social life, very largely through the complex

self-subjugations that religion has made possible. Within the shell and

cover of religion the new less self-centred habits of mind have been

able to develop. An immense mass of imaginative work, of mythology,

of theology, that now seems tortuous, mystical, and fantastic, was

necessary for the casting of the new moral being of socialised man.

We seem to be entering upon a phase in which moral and intellectual

education may be able to free themselves from the last vestiges of

the mythology in which that new moral being was moulded; but it is

ungracious and false to the true outline of history to deny the

necessary part that the priest, the sacrifice, the magic ceremonial

for tribal welfare, the early tribal religions, have played in this

transfiguration of the sub-human into the modern human mind, upon which

all our community rests to-day.

It is because of our sense of this continuity of our present

dispositions with the religions upon which they are founded that so

many of us are loth to part with all the forms and phrases of the old

creeds and all the disciplines of time-honoured cults. Perhaps some of

us (the present writer in the crowd among others) have been over-eager

to read new significances into established phrases, and clothe new

ideas in the languages of the old scheme of salvation. It may be we

have been pouring new wine into old bottles. It may be better to admit

frankly that if man is not fixed Christianity is, and that mankind is

now growing out of Christianity; that indeed mankind is growing out of

the idea of Deity. This does not mean an end to religion, but it means

a fresh orientation of the religious life. It means a final severance

with those anthropomorphic conceptions of destiny, that interpretation

of all things in terms of personality and will with which religion

began. For many of us that still means a wrench and an effort. But the

emphatic assertions of Mr. Belloc, the stand that Catholicism, as he

expounds it, makes against any progressive adaptation to the new spirit

in human life, may render that effort easier.

In this examination of Mr. Belloc’s opening and more fundamental

attacks upon the _Outline of History_ I have shown sufficiently that

Mr. Belloc is incapable of evidence or discussion, that he imagines

his authorities, that he is careless and ignorant as to his facts and

slovenly and tricky in his logic. I have dealt kindly but adequately

with his atrocious bad manners and his insolence and impudence. I do

not think it is worth while to go on through the second half of his

outpourings with any particularity. It is exactly the same kind of

thing, but upon more familiar ground and less fundamental issues. Mr.

Belloc quibbles. He falsifies. For example, he imagines traditions to

reinforce the Gospel account of Christ’s teaching and to show that

the founder of Christianity was aware of his godhead and taught the

doctrine of the Trinity; he declares--just out of his head--that I

do not know it was the bull and not Mithra who was sacrificed in the

system of Mithraism, though I state that quite plainly in a passage

he has ventured to ignore. And so on. The wonderful methods of the

Palæolithic bow story repeat themselves with variations, time after

time. Why should I trouble to repeat the exposure in every case? I have

done enough to demonstrate the quality of this effort to bluff and

bawl away accepted knowledge and manifest fact, and that is all that I

set out to do.

And this apparently is the present state of Catholic teaching.

This stuff I have examined is the current utterance of organised

Christianity, so far as there is any utterance, upon the doctrines of

the Creation and the Fall--doctrines upon which rest the whole scheme

of Christian salvation and the entire fabric of a Christian’s faith.

Mr. Belloc objects to "The outline of history" · 第 41 / 42 题