CHAPTER X.

DIPLOMACY, OR THE CASTLE OF COPPET.

(OCTOBER 12TH 1535.)

[Sidenote: DIPLOMACY AND WAR.]

Diplomacy and war are the two means employed to decide international

differences. It is customary to speak disparagingly of both, and not

without cause. All who care for their fellow-men and desire the material

and moral prosperity of nations, look upon war as a crime against

humanity; and yet a people, invaded by an unjust and ambitious

conqueror, who desires to despoil them of their independence and

nationality, have as much right to defend themselves as the man attacked

on the highway by a robber bent on depriving him of his purse or his

life.

Diplomacy has its faults, like war. Its object being to conciliate

jarring interests, it falls easily into narrow and selfish views, while

it should possess that broad wisdom which reconciles differences with

impartiality. Fully acknowledging the tact with which in ordinary times

it adheres to the path it ought to follow, we think that it gets

confused and goes astray in periods of transition, when society is

passing from one phase to another. Seamen on a distant voyage have

observed that in certain latitudes and on certain days the

compass-needle is so agitated that the steersman cannot make use of it

to direct his course: it turns, perhaps, to the right when it should

point to the left. This is just the case with diplomacy in those great

epochs, when, as in the sixteenth century, society is turning on its

hinges and entering into a new sphere. In such a case diplomacy acts

first in a direction contrary to the impulses which prepare the future:

it devotes all its care to maintain what has been, while the normal

character of the new epoch is precisely that what has been must give

place to what is to be. Governments, naturally enough, always begin by

opposing the new developments of social, political, and religious life.

This is just what the powerful aristocracy of Berne did at first with

regard to Geneva: we have seen it once and we shall see it again. But if

there is a bad diplomacy, there is also a good one. Would it be out of

place to remark here, that if the château of Coppet, where some of the

facts of our history occurred, was in 1535 the seat of bad policy, it

became afterwards the centre of a liberal statesmanship?[650]

The Council of Berne had kept themselves carefully informed of the

proceedings of Claude Savoye. They had learnt that about four hundred

and fifty men, 'among whom were several of My Lords' subjects,' were

crossing the Jura to succor Geneva, 'not without danger, because of the

smallness of their number.' The Council knew that these men would have

to fight the nobles and other people of the country, brought together

from every quarter in the villages and on the roads, to the number of

more than three or four thousand. The Bernese magistrates wished,

besides, to avoid war. They had, therefore, deputed Louis of Diesbach

and Rodolph Nägueli to the Pays de Vaud, with instructions to order the

volunteers to return home. The two Bernese ambassadors had made their

way to the castle of Coppet, situated between Geneva and Gingins.[651]

There was just then a great crowd in that feudal residence, which has

since been replaced by a modern château. That place, which was one day

to be the asylum of letters and of liberty, was now, by a singular

contrast, the head-quarters of a rude and ignorant gentry, who desired

at any price to maintain feudalism, and destroy in Geneva light,

independence, and faith. Monseigneur de Lullin, governor of the Pays de

Vaud in behalf of the duke, had taken up his abode there with his

officers and several gentlemen of the district.

[Sidenote: CONFERENCE AT COPPET.]

On Saturday, 29th October, the day when Wildermuth and his band reached

the village of Saint Cergues, the ambassadors from Berne had arrived at

the castle of Coppet, with the intention of coming to some understanding

with the governor of Vaud on the means of preventing the battle that was

imminent. Here they learnt that it was nearer than they had imagined,

and that the Swiss were expected on the following morning. The Savoyard

and Bernese chiefs immediately entered into a conference on these

serious matters, and they were still in discussion when Claude Savoye,

who had only two or three leagues to pass over, arrived on his panting

courser. The daring Genevan was fully conscious that it was

very imprudent to show himself in the castle occupied by the

commander-in-chief of the enemies of Geneva; but it mattered not to him;

he wanted to obtain from Diesbach, at any risk, a promise that he would

not stop the troops that Claude was bringing to the help of his

fellow-citizens.

The Sire de Lullin, being informed of his arrival, was surprised and

exasperated: there was a stormy scene in the conference, and that clever

but hasty and passionate administrator ordered the heretical and

rebellious Genevan to be seized. The latter, escorted by armed men, soon

appeared before him in the principal hall of the castle. To the

Savoyards about the governor, a huguenot of Geneva was a kind of monster

which aroused alike their curiosity and horror. Savoye, finding himself

in the lion's jaws, presented the paper that D'Allinges had sent him.

This put a climax to the governor's passion. 'By what right,' he asked

that chief, 'do you give a safe-conduct?'[652] Lullin, imagining that

the noble Savoyard might be a traitor in correspondence with the enemies

of his highness, ordered both the bearer and the giver of the passport

to be locked up. The ambassadors of Berne did not think it their duty to

offer any opposition: the main thing for them was to obtain a promise

from the governor to do all in his power to hinder the arrival of the

Swiss band. They therefore asked him to set out with them the next

morning (Sunday, October 10th) at daybreak, to climb the mountain on

whose top they hoped still to find Wildermuth and his followers, and to

make them return.[653] De Lullin would not consent to this proposition.

He wished to suffer the little Swiss force to descend into the plain,

not doubting that the soldiers under his orders would crush them to

pieces. An opportunity offered of giving a sound lesson to those

adventurers who dared measure themselves against the duke of Savoy: not

one of those rash men should return home. But the Bernese were still

more decided than the Savoyard governor, and after many efforts

succeeded in bringing him round to their views. 'We came to the

conclusion, after much trouble,' they said in their report, 'to go and

meet them and make them retire in confidence to their own country, at

the expense of My Lord of Savoy.'[654]

[Sidenote: SIRE DE LULLIN'S SCHEMES.]

Very different thoughts occupied the dwellers in the castle during the

night which followed these deliberations. While the Bernese were

reflecting on the means of preventing a battle, the governor examined

his plans: he had three to four thousand soldiers, fresh, vigorous, and

ready for the combat, while the Swiss were only four or five hundred

tired and starving men. Not to take advantage of such an opportunity of

punishing those 'heretics and mischief-makers,' appeared to him a

serious fault. Without breaking his promise, it was possible (if he

procrastinated) that the Swiss would have time to come down from the

mountains and be cut to pieces by the Savoyards. On Sunday morning

Diesbach and Nägueli were stirring at daybreak, but Lullin made them

wait a long time for him. When he appeared, the Bernese told him they

were ready to start, according to their agreement. 'Excuse me,

gentlemen,' said the governor, 'I must hear mass first: we catholics

never begin a journey without it.'[655] The mass was very tedious; at

length the Bernese, seeing the governor return, thought their long trial

was ended; but Lullin, convinced as ever that by giving time to his

troops they would destroy Wildermuth's band, said to them: 'Gentlemen,

they are about to serve up a collation: it is impossible to start

without breakfasting.'[656] The collation had to be waited for: Lullin

and his officers talked much and with extreme amiability. 'Really, the

governor and his gentlemen are keeping us a little too long this

morning,' said the ambassadors,[657] who were quite wearied with these

delays. At length they sat down to table, and would no doubt have sat

there long, but that suddenly a noise like discharges of musketry was

heard. The Bernese ambassadors sprang to their feet. There was no more

room for doubt: the battle had begun, and it was perhaps too late to

fulfil their commission. They determined, notwithstanding, to ride to

the field of battle. The Savoyard governor, thinking that, in

consequence of all his delays, his men-at-arms would have had time to

cut the Swiss to pieces, raised no more difficulties. They went down

into the courtyard of the castle, where for several hours thirty horses

had been stamping impatiently, and a great number of officers, guards,

and servants had been gossiping. 'Bring me the Genevan's fine Spanish

horse,' said the governor, 'and give him a donkey.'[658] They brought

Savoye's noble courser to the Sire de Lullin. 'Give me also his

arquebuse,' added the sharp-witted Savoyard, 'for I am sure it is a good

one.' The troop fell in: the thirty horsemen and the governor's guards

surrounded the Sire de Lullin, his officers, the Bernese, and poor

Savoye mounted on his humble quadruped. They could not go very fast in

consideration of the heretical donkey, which Lullin would not leave

behind. Claude did not allow himself to be vexed by the ridicule with

which the governor tried to cover him, and sooner than stay at Coppet he

preferred they should laugh at him and treat him as a common prisoner.

Meanwhile, the governor and his escort kept advancing, looking before

them and trying if they could not discover the Swiss. Suddenly, at a

short distance from Gingins, the strangest and most unexpected sight met

their eyes. Soldiers were flying in every direction—along the highway,

through the lanes, across the fields: everywhere terror, confusion, and

all the marks of a signal defeat. The governor looked attentively: it

was useless trying to deceive himself, the runaways were his own

soldiers. He had expected to see the hostile band destroyed, and he

found those who were to accomplish his designs fleeing in confusion.

Incensed by such cowardice, he approached some of the fugitives and

cried out: 'What are you doing, you poltroons? Stop! why are you running

away? Are you not ten times as numerous as the heretics? Turn back and

help me to hang them!'[659] But the Savoyards, smitten with a panic

terror, passed near him almost without seeing him. It was impossible to

check their flight.

[Sidenote: THE BERNESE AMBASSADORS.]

What was to be done at such a strange conjuncture? There was but one

course to be taken. The governor had flattered himself with the hope of

seeing the Swiss crushed or of crushing them himself, and he had found

them victorious. Instead of having recourse to the sword, he must make

up his mind to an humble prayer. It appears that neither Lullin nor

Diesbach had any hope of seeing a third attack succeed. The Bernese

ambassadors, commissioned by their Council to act as mediators, must

therefore advance and stop the terrible band. De Lullin gave them some

of his horsemen as an escort, and they galloped off. At one time they

were stopped by bands of fugitives, at another they fell into the midst

of the Savoyard cavalry marching forward to rejoin their colors: at last

they arrived on the field of battle. It was the moment when the Swiss,

having gained two victories and returned thanks to God, had perceived

that fresh troops were approaching, and were preparing to renew the

combat for a third time.[660] But at the sight of the lords of Berne

they halted. This important circumstance was about to give a new and

unexpected turn to events.

During this time what was the Genevan doing on his donkey? The

chroniclers do not tell us: he disappeared, he vanished. We may

conjecture that, seeing Lullin occupied in rallying his troops, still

hoping that another battle would be fought, and comprehending the

necessity of informing the Councils of what was going on, he took

advantage of the general confusion to make for Geneva, to call his

fellow-citizens to take part in this heroic affair, and unite with the

Swiss. However that may be, the news of the battle of Gingins was

brought to Geneva by Savoye, or some other person, on the 11th of

October, the day after the fight, and the whole city was in commotion. A

deadly combat (they said) has taken place between our liberators and our

oppressors. Four hundred Savoyards were left on the field, but the

Swiss, surrounded by numerous troops, are shut up near Nyon, and in

great danger of being cut to pieces!

[Sidenote: GENEVA IN ARMS.]

Then arose a cry in the free city! They knew the number of the

Savoyards, and even exaggerated them; but the Swiss must be saved at any

cost. Besides, there could be no doubt that if that little band was

destroyed, Lugrin, Mangerot, and the other chiefs would turn against

Geneva. The Genevese did not hesitate: they had already fought many a

battle, and were ready to fight others. The strong man is he who

struggles continuously. The swimmer who ceases to make head against the

current is swept away by the stream and disappears. The people whose

liberty or faith is threatened, must, like the strong man, struggle

until the last, for fear the rushing waters should overwhelm him. This

was the example long given by the small city of Geneva: for ages she had

been struggling for her independence; for ages to come she struggled for

her faith.

Baudichon de la Maisonneuve, the captain-general, summoned all the

citizens to arms. There was no difficulty in collecting them. They

talked in Geneva of the unheard-of difficulties which the Swiss had had

to overcome in traversing the Jura. Such sufferings, toils, diligence,

and love (said the people); such signal services; the great dangers to

which those brave men have been exposed on our account—shall we repay

them only with ingratitude?[661] The Genevans resolved to deliver the

Swiss or to die with them. In an instant they were under arms; 'about

two thousand men,' says Froment, placed themselves, fully equipped,

under the orders of Baudichon de la Maisonneuve; other documents speak

of five hundred only—a number which seems nearer the truth. Froment,

probably, counted all who took up arms: the oldest, who remained in the

city to defend it, as well as the youngest, who left it to march to the

aid of Wildermuth's band. Eight pieces of artillery were taken out of

the arsenal,[662] and the army having been divided into three corps

under separate captains, Baudichon de la Maisonneuve took the

command-in-chief.[663]

They departed. The soldiers of Geneva advanced enthusiastically towards

the Pays de Vaud, and hastened their steps for fear they should arrive

too late. At the sight of Baudichon's little army the scattered

Savoyards, whom fear had brought as far as Versoix and the neighborhood

of Coppet, and who were still trembling at the thought of yesterday's

combat, imagined that everything was lost. 'We are all going to be

killed,' they said, 'and the country conquered.' Some fled in different

directions across the fields; others, fearing there would be no time to

run, hid themselves in the _courtels_ or inclosed gardens in the

vicinity of Coppet; while others more frightened still, wishing to put

the lake between them and their enemies, jumped into some boats moored

to the bank, and for want of oars employed their halberds, and thus,

rowing with all their might, reached the shore of Savoy. The Genevans,

without stopping to pursue the fugitives, arrived to within a short

distance of Coppet. 'If once we are united with the Swiss, which can be

easily done,' they said, 'our country is saved.'[664]

On Sunday evening and Monday morning diplomacy had done its work. The

envoys of Berne, arriving on the field of battle at the moment when the

Swiss were going for a third time to rush upon the Savoyard army, had

stationed themselves in front of that band of heroes, and, faithful to

the diplomatic spirit which at that time prevailed in the councils of

the powerful republic, had said: 'Halt! On behalf of our superiors we

command you to retire. The Savoyards are many, and quite prepared to

receive you warmly.' The lords of Berne were accustomed to command, and

their dependents to obey: they hoped, therefore, to gain the men of

Seeland. Further, Louis of Diesbach, who had distinguished himself in

the Italian wars, and had been governor of Neuchâtel after the Swiss had

carried off its prince, Louis of Orleans, fancied himself on that

account sure of persuading those Neuchâtelers who had remained faithful

to the enterprise. Calling them aside, he endeavored to show them, as

well as the Bernese, 'that it would be better for them to retire with a

good victory than to run into greater danger.'—'Every effort was made by

soft words to induce the valiant champions to return,' says Froment.

Diplomacy was less sure than it appeared to be of the defeat which, as

it pretended, awaited the companions of Wildermuth. If alone they had

won two victories, what would they not do with the help of the men of

Geneva? The Savoyards were placed between two fires, and it appeared to

many that they were all going to be taken and their country

conquered.[665] The followers of La Maisonneuve, combining with those of

Wildermuth, would expel the Savoyards from the country and unite it

either to Geneva or to Switzerland. On the other hand, the diplomatists

said to the Swiss, that another attack would expose them to the risk of

a defeat as signal as their triumph had been; that the battles which

such brave men had fought would not be useless; and that the Bernese,

intrusted with the task of mediation, would obtain from Savoy a good

peace in favor of Geneva. 'See, you have been two or three days without

eating,' added Diesbach; 'two battles have exhausted your strength. Make

your way to the village of Founex, above Coppet; abundant supplies are

waiting for you, and there you shall receive our last directions.' Thus

spoke the lords of Berne.

[Sidenote: THE SWISS MARCH TO FOUNEX.]

But the intrepid men of the Seeland and Neuchâtel contingent were

'greatly angered;' they asked whether they should let themselves be

seduced by 'soft words' or 'foolish fears;' they laughed at the attempt

to frighten them with the Savoyards, who were (they said) so scared that

they did not know what they were about! But the ambassadors did not

cease their exertions, and already the Swiss were hesitating. A number

of the Bernese did not wish to put themselves in opposition to the

government of their canton; and the Neuchâtelers thought that as it was

the lords of Berne who had supported Neuchâtel in the work of Reform,

they would not be likely to abandon Geneva. The greater number,

exhausted and worn out by two days' journeying in the snow and one day

of hard fighting, and having had no other food than a few turnips, were

of opinion, that as they were weakened by hunger, and the food was

offered them at Founex which had not been given them at Gingins, it was

quite natural to go there. Besides, that was not relinquishing their

design. Was not Founex on the road to Geneva? The ambassadors became

more urgent, and at last all marched off, leaving, not without regret,

the glorious field of battle. 'And so they came to Founex, where they

were supplied with meat and drink,' say the registers of Geneva.[666]

The Bernese lords saw them march off, and when the last had passed them,

they breathed freely, turned their bridles, and with their escort took

the road to Coppet, much pleased at having succeeded so well. But they

were not yet at the end of their troubles. They had hardly proceeded

half way when they were exposed to a new danger. A Savoyard squadron,

about sixty strong, was approaching: on coming within a short distance

of the Bernese, the horsemen set spurs to their horses and dashed upon

the ambassadors and their escort, shouting out, 'Slay, slay!' One of

them, placing his musket on Diesbach's breast, was preparing to kill

him.[667] In the midst of the alarm that had seized them, the Bernese

diplomatists began to understand that it is not wise to choose one's

friends badly. However, Diesbach escaped with a fright, one of his

escort having turned the musket aside. The explanations of the

ambassadors did not satisfy the Savoyards, who were a reinforcement of

cavalry on their way to Gingins, to help their countrymen to take

satisfaction for the defeat which their friends had suffered. They were

furious, and swore they would avenge their comrades murdered in two

affairs by the Bernese. Convinced that these patricians of Berne were in

a plot with the victors, they made them prisoners, ordered them to get

off their horses, and forcing them to march on foot between them, as if

they were robbers, intended to put them in prison at Nyon. At last,

however, after fresh parleying, those rude horsemen found out that they

were taking away the governor's friends, and, intimidated by the

knowledge, they hastened to release the envoys, who remounted their

horses and rode off to Coppet. It was late when they arrived at the

castle, where serious matters awaited them.[668]

[Sidenote: DIPLOMATIC TRICKERY.]

The next morning, Monday, 11th of October, the governor, the two Bernese

deputies, and several gentlemen, having met at breakfast, were

discussing what was to be done, 'as they sat eating, drinking, and

banqueting,' when an officer entered and informed them that a Genevese

army, commanded by De la Maisonneuve, was approaching the castle. The

whole place was in confusion. The Savoyard army was so far off that the

Genevese might by a bold stroke seize the governor of Vaud, with his

officers and gentlemen, and even the envoys of Berne, and carry them

away to Geneva. Such a blow would have been quite in harmony with

Baudichon's daring character; if he had been able to make the bishop

quit Geneva, he might easily (thought many) deliver his city from the

lords who were conspiring at Coppet. What could be done to stop him?

Those gentlemen invented 'an old trick of war,' says the chronicle,

according to which every man, not in a position to resist his

adversaries, makes a pretence of wishing for peace, either to gain time

or to draw his enemy into a snare. At any price the men of Geneva must

be induced to return. Diplomacy, therefore, recommenced its stratagems.

The governor of Vaud, although more determined than ever to destroy that

restless city, commissioned some of his gentlemen to go and inform the

Genevan commander that they were in conference, and that they were even

ready to sign the preliminaries of a peace advantageous to the city; but

that, in order to complete the negotiations, they wanted three deputies

from Geneva.

The gentlemen of Savoy, the bearers of this message, having arrived at

the Genevan outposts, and being conducted to De la Maisonneuve,

discharged their pacific mission. Opinions were divided. Some suspected

a trick, and contended that if the troops of Geneva and Neuchâtel could

meet, the independence of Geneva would be secured. They therefore did

all they could to oppose the conference; but others affirmed that they

could trust M. de Diesbach; and that the best course would be to send

three of their men, to ascertain the sincerity of these proposals of

peace and then return and make their report. 'Who will guarantee their

return?' cried those who feared the Savoyard governor. Upon this the

gentlemen of the Sire de Lullin pledged their 'faith and promise' that

no harm should befall the delegates. The worthy Genevans, being

unwilling to suspect perjury, gave way, and selected as their envoys

Jean d'Arlod, Thibaut Tocker, and Jean Lambert.

[Sidenote: GENEVAN ENVOYS IMPRISONED.]

When this deputation reached the castle, the Sire de Lullin and his

guests were again occupied in eating, drinking, and banqueting. This

intimacy of the lords of Berne with the enemies of Geneva displeased

d'Arlod and his colleagues; but all the same they resolved to discharge

their mission faithfully. They had not long to wait before they learnt

that the Savoyard chiefs had no idea of peace; and that they wanted to

crush that sect, rebellious to the laws of the Church,—that sect which

they had so long loaded with their contempt, which dismissed the

priests, declared its independence of the pope, made laws contrary to

those which for centuries had governed Christendom, and pretended to

treat with Rome as an equal. Those huguenots had deprived the saints of

the honors they had enjoyed, destroyed the images, abolished the mass,

and interdicted the sacred rites. What was then to be done, except to

treat their deputies as criminals? The Genevan plenipotentiaries asked

to see the preliminaries of the peace which it was desired to conclude

with them. The Sire de Lullin could not believe his ears, and, bursting

with anger, he flew into a passion at their audacity: 'What! rebels dare

ask to know the _preliminaries_!' He ordered them to be seized. It was

useless for the Genevans to appeal to the promise that had been given

them; Lullin would not hear a word, and, desiring war at any price, was

determined to trample under foot the inviolability with which the law of

nations invests internuncios. The three Genevans were 'tied and fastened

like robbers.'—'Take them to the castle of Chillon,' said Lullin, 'where

they will be able to talk with M. de Saint Victor (Bonivard), who has

already spent six years there for the business of Geneva.' The three

noble citizens were carried off and shut up in the fortress of Chillon.

It was the opinion then at Coppet, as it had been a century before at

Constance, 'that no one is bound to keep faith with heretics.'[669]

De la Maisonneuve and his officers waited impatiently for the return of

their delegates; the time slipped away, and they did not appear. The

fear of deplorable events began to disturb the least credulous minds.

'It is probable,' said some, 'that this is a _going_ which will have no

_returning_.'[670] The commander sent the trumpeter, Ami Voullier, to

inquire what was going on—a duty belonging in those days to his office.

Voullier, either because he inclined to the worse side, or was bribed by

the enemy, or suffered himself to be deceived by some crafty Savoyard,

returned and reported that the gentlemen at the castle were occupied in

drawing up the articles of peace; and that the place was not undefended,

for he had seen in the vineyards round about it more soldiers than

vinestocks. He added that, as peace was about to be concluded, the

presence of armed men who were not to fight was useless, and that the

best thing would be for every man to return home. The most pacific of

the Genevans, believing their delegates to be really occupied in drawing

up a real treaty, insisted upon returning to the city. An experienced

and clear-sighted commander, a man of superior mind, would not have been

satisfied with the trumpeter's report. He would not have left the

place without being put in direct communication with the three

plenipotentiaries. If he had discovered the governor's perfidy, he would

have been able, especially with the support of the Swiss, to surround

the castle, capture the governor and his suite, and the Bernese

themselves, and not release them until he had obtained the deliverance

of his envoys. Even if it were true that they were discussing a treaty

of peace, would it not have been of advantage for the forces of Geneva

to remain near Coppet to add strength to the representations of their

delegates? De la Maisonneuve was a good citizen, a good protestant, and

a soldier, but he was neither a great general nor a keen diplomatist.

Besides, a noble simplicity of heart does not suspect dissimulation.

Those proud huguenots, who erred sometimes through too much violence,

erred now through too much simplicity. It was decided that, as peace was

going to be signed, the Genevans should return home. The corps started

for Geneva. This error weighed heavily upon Baudichon de la Maisonneuve,

and troubled him all the rest of his life.

[Sidenote: THE SWISS VOLUNTEERS DUPED.]

The skilful diplomatists assembled at Coppet, having thus got rid of the

Genevese, undertook to rid themselves in a similar manner of the Swiss

cantoned at Founex. Some of them, going to Wildermuth's little army,

said: 'Peace is concluded. All soldiers must now return home. The city

of the huguenots will now be free. You have fairly acquired the right to

enjoy repose. Moreover, the governor of Vaud undertakes to pay the

expense of your journey.' The Swiss gave way like the Genevans. An

heroic victory was succeeded by a diplomatic defeat. If the honest have

their power, the cunning have theirs also. It is the fate of humble and

sincere individuals and nations to be sometimes mystified by the adroit

and powerful. As regards the Swiss, the last verse of the war-song of

Gingins shows that, if they turned their steps homewards, it was because

of their conviction that the deliverance of Geneva was secured.

'Finish the matter,' we said, 'in order that the city of Geneva may be

delivered—that is all we ask; that peace may be secured to her, so that

the Word of God may be preached within her walls in all liberty, that

the Lord's fold may be saved, and then we shall return joyful to our

homes.'[671]

But these strains were the illusions of honorable minds. If arms had

wrought the triumph of right and liberty at Gingins, policy had procured

the triumph of fraud and despotism at Coppet.

Still one question arises. Was the battle of Gingins useless? No, for it

saved Geneva. The bravery of the Swiss and their victory were deeply

imprinted in the minds of the population of Vaud. They talked of it in

villages and castles, and even in Savoy. Accordingly, some months later,

when an army sent by the Councils of Berne appeared in the country, no

one dared measure himself with it, the bravery of the Swiss still

freezing all hearts with terror.

Louis of Diesbach and his colleagues, who arrived at Geneva the day

after the treason of Coppet, proposed to the council a treaty with the

duke, stipulating, among other things, that the traitors of Peney should

be restored to their privileges. 'What!' said the premier Syndic, 'you

have sent back those who were coming to our help, and you claim to place

within our walls those who will never cease from making war on us!'[672]

De la Maisonneuve, discovering that the trumpeter had made a false

report, and that his troops, instead of returning to Geneva, ought to

have marched upon Coppet, could not contain his sorrow and rage. He

declared the man guilty of high-treason, and many persons joined with

him in demanding Ami Voullier's head. His life was, however, spared, but

he lost the esteem of his fellow-citizens.[673]

The indignation of the magistrates and of the chiefs of the soldiery was

trifling compared with the anger of the people. The thought that the

envoys had been shut up within the walls of Chillon made all their

hearts burn. 'Let us make reprisals,' said the relatives of the victims

to the syndics, 'and to make sure that they will restore us our

fellow-citizens, let us seize hostages who are as good as they.' Three

notable men, at that time within the reach of the Genevans—M. de Sales,

the Bastard of Wufflens, and M. de Montfort—were laid hold of.[674] The

last-named was a monk of the convent of St. Jean, situated on the

heights bathed by the blue waters of the Rhone, at the gates of Geneva,

although within the duke's territories. The people do not weigh the

claims of justice so calmly as wise men in council. The flames which

burnt in every heart broke out all of a sudden. There was shouting and

assembling. The popular waves rose higher from street to street, tossing

and foaming. 'Shall we leave at the very gates of the city,' was the

cry, 'a building whence the enemy can make his artillery bear upon us?'

The crowd rushed to St. Jean, scaled the walls, seized De Montfort,

climbed on the roof, broke, demolished, and threw down everything, and

did not stop until the convent was in ruins. The crime of Coppet

produced the execution at St. Jean. Popular indignation did not reflect

that in all states, and especially in republics, nothing should be done

except by the law.

[650] See the works of Madame de Staël, her family, the Duc de Broglie,

Comte Haussonville, and her friends.

[651] Report of the two Bernese envoys to the Council of Geneva.

[652] 'Von Lullin sagte Alinges hatte Gleit zu geben keine

Gewalt.'—Stettler, _Chronik_.

[653] 'Die Deutsche heim zu mahnen, und zu Ihnen den Berg hinauf zu

reiten.'—_Ibid._

[654] Report of the two Bernese envoys.—_Registres du Conseil de

Genève._

[655] 'Hielt die Berner betrüglich auf, bemeldeter von Lullin, und

sagte: Er wollte zum ersten Mess hören.'—Stettler, _Chronik_.

[656] 'Und eine Collation thun.'—_Ibid._

[657] Registres du Conseil de Genève du 12 Octobre 1535.

[658] 'Nahm er des Genfers starken hispanischen Hengst, setzt

denselbigen hingegen auf einen Esel.'—Stettler, _Chronik_, p. 71.

[659] 'Vermahnet sie ihren Feinden bey Hencken zügestehen.'—Stettler,

_Chronik_, p. 71.

[660] Stettler says that the Swiss had already started for Geneva when

the Bernese arrived; and Ruchat and others say the same. On reading the

manuscript registers of the Council of Geneva, it is seen that the

report of Messieurs de Berne states expressly the contrary; and Froment

corroborates this report, p. 196.

[661] These are the words spoken in the Council.—See the _Registres du

Conseil_ for the 11th October 1535.

[662] _Registres du Conseil_, _ad diem_.

[663] Froment, _Gestes de Genève_, p. 197.

[664] _Registres du Conseil_ du 11 Octobre 1535.—MSC. de Roset,

liv. iii. ch. 51.

[665] 'Gaigné.' Froment. _Gestes de Genève_, p. 197.

[666] Registres du Conseil de Genève du 12 Octobre 1535.—Froment,

_Gestes de Genève_, pp. 196-198.

[667] 'Die Schryen, Würgen, würgen! Setzten dem von Diesbach ein

Feuerbüchsen an die Brust.'—Stettler, _Chronik_, p. 71.

[668] Stettler, _Chronik_, p. 72.

[669] Froment, _Gestes de Genève_, p. 198.—Registres du Conseil du 11

Octobre 1535.—MSC. de Roset, liv. iii. ch. 41.

[670] 'Une _allée_ qui n'aura pas de _retour_.'

[671] Froment, _Gestes de Genève_, p. 199.—MSC. de Roset, liv. iii.

ch. 41.—_Schweizer Chronik in Liedern_, Berne, 1535.

[672] Registres du Conseil du 12 Octobre 1535.—MSC. de Roset, liv. iii.

ch. 42.

[673] Froment, Roset, &c.

[674] Chron. MSC. de Roset, liv. iii. ch. 51.

History of the Reformation in Europe in the Time of Calvin, Vol. 5 (of 8) · 第 10 / 17 章