VARIETIES.

Much confusion exists in the naming of fig varieties. They were first

introduced by the early French and Spanish settlers, and there have been

more or less frequent importations since. Trees from these various

sources have been known under many local names, and it is probable that

there are now many more names recorded than we have varieties in

cultivation. On the other hand, distinct varieties are often met with

that can not be named from published descriptions. In Louisiana and

Mississippi it is safe to say that nine-tenths of all the figs grown are

of the Celeste variety. This is sometimes written Celestial, but among

growers it is uniformly known as Celeste. The tree is hardy and very

fruitful. The fruit is small, but it is one of the best in quality. When

ripe it is a light yellowish brown, tinged with violet. The flesh is

light red, delicate in texture, and very sweet and rich. A number of

other varieties occur, but they are known under local names, such as

“black fig” or “Spanish fig.” More attention has been paid to

nomenclature and to the planting of different varieties in other parts

of the South, but the Celeste is the favorite in nearly all localities.

Some interesting papers on figs were read at the meeting of the American

Pomological Society, held in Florida in 1889, and in the published

proceedings of the meeting the following 18 varieties are catalogued

among the fruits recommended by the society.

_List of figs recommended by American Pomological Society._

Alicante; Angelique—synonym, _Jaune Hative_; Brunswick; Blue Genoa;

Black Ischia; Brown Smyrna; Celeste; Green Ischia—synonyms, _White

Ischia_, _Green Italian_; Lemon; Violet, Long; Violet, Round; Nerii;

Pregussata; White Adriatic; White Marseillaise; White Genoa; Superfine

de la Sausaye; Turkey—synonym, _Brown Turkey_.

On comparing this list with 11 others furnished by nurserymen and

writers on the fig, and taken at random from Texas, Louisiana, Georgia,

and Florida sources, we find 14 of these names occurring more or less

frequently. Four are not mentioned at all, while 13 additional names

appear, making a total of 31 varieties in the 12 lists. Celeste and

Brown Turkey lead, being mentioned 11 times each; Adriatic, Lemon, and

Brunswick come next, each occurring 8 times. White Marseillaise is

mentioned 7 times; White Genoa and Green Ischia, 6 times; Black Ischia,

5 times; and San Pedro, which is not in the American Pomological

Society’s list, occurs 4 times. We may perhaps conclude that these 10

varieties are the most generally grown in the South, but some of them

are to be considered as nurserymen’s recent introductions from

California, rather than as varieties in general use. They are

characterized in the Pomological Society’s list as follows:

────────────────────┬──────────────┬────────────┬─────────┬────────────

Variety. │ Season. │ Color. │Quality. │ Size.

────────────────────┼──────────────┼────────────┼─────────┼────────────

Brunswick │Early │Violet │First │Very large.

Black Ischia │Medium │Black │ do │Medium.

Celestial [Celeste] │Early │Pale violet │ do │Small.

Green Ischia │ do │Green │ do │Medium.

Lemon │ do │Yellow │ do │ Do.

White Adriatic │ │ │ │

White Marseillaise │Medium │White │Second │Medium.

White Genoa │ do │ do │ do │Large.

Turkey │Early to late │Brown │First │ Do.

San Pedro │Not mentioned │ │ │

────────────────────┴──────────────┴────────────┴─────────┴────────────

Other lists agree in describing both White Adriatic and San Pedro as

very large white figs of the best quality and very desirable where they

succeed, but as being tender and nonfruitful in many locations. Celeste,

Brown Turkey, and Brunswick are more uniformly commended for hardiness,

fruitfulness, and general utility than any others.[5]

Footnote 5:

The canning factories greatly prefer the Celeste, paying one-fourth

more for them than for larger, coarser kinds.

Fig Culture Edible Figs: Their Culture and Curing. Fig Culture in the Gulf States. · 第 54 / 57 题