A few extracts from different authors will explain this law:--

_Du Moulin_, in his excellent little volume upon _Peace and Content_,

says, “Of children expect no good, but the satisfaction to have

done them good, and to see them do well for themselves. For in this

relation, the nature of beneficence is to _descend_, seldom to

_remount_.”

So Bishop Taylor, in his _Life of Christ_, when speaking of mothers who

do not nurse their own children, says, “And if love _descends_ more

strongly than it _ascends_, and commonly falls from the parents upon

the children in cataracts, and returns back again up to the parents but

in small dews,--if the child’s affection keeps the same proportions

towards such unkind mothers, it will be as little as atoms in the sun,

and never expresses itself but when the mother needs it not,--that is,

in the sunshine of a clear fortune.”

So Fuller says, in his chapter on Moderation, the silken string that

runs through the pearl chain of all the virtues, “yea as love, doth

_descend_, and men doat most on their grand-children.”

The same sentiment, with the reason in which the truth originates, has

been noticed by our poets.

Female affection · 第 24 / 33 题