I glanced off, as one often does in talk.

The Monument is an awful place to visit,--I said.--The waves of time

are like the waves of the ocean; the only thing they beat against

without destroying it is a rock; and they destroy that at last. But it

takes a good while. There is a stone now standing in very good order

that was as old as a monument of Louis XIV. and Queen Anne's day is

now when Joseph went down into Egypt. Think of the shaft on Bunker Hill

standing in the sunshine on the morning of January 1st in the year 5872!

It won't be standing,--the Master said.--We are poor bunglers compared

to those old Egyptians. There are no joints in one of their obelisks.

They are our masters in more ways than we know of, and in more ways than

some of us are willing to know. That old Lawgiver wasn't learned in all

the wisdom of the Egyptians for nothing. It scared people well a couple

of hundred years ago when Sir John Marsham and Dr. John Spencer ventured

to tell their stories about the sacred ceremonies of the Egyptian

priesthood. People are beginning to find out now that you can't study

any religion by itself to any good purpose. You must have comparative

theology as you have comparative anatomy. What would you make of a cat's

foolish little good-for-nothing collar-bone, if you did not know how

the same bone means a good deal in other creatures,--in yourself, for

instance, as you 'll find out if you break it? You can't know too much

of your race and its beliefs, if you want to know anything about your

Maker. I never found but one sect large enough to hold the whole of me.

--And may I ask what that was?--I said.

--The Human sect,--the Master answered. That has about room enough for

me,--at present, I mean to say.

--Including cannibals and all?--said I.

-Oh, as to that, the eating of one's kind is a matter of taste, but the

roasting of them has been rather more a specialty of our own particular

belief than of any other I am acquainted with. If you broil a saint, I

don't see why, if you have a mind, you shouldn't serve him up at your--

Pop! went the little piece of artillery. Don't tell me it was accident.

I know better. You can't suppose for one minute that a boy like that

one would time his interruptions so cleverly. Now it so happened that

at that particular moment Dr. B. Franklin was not at the table. You may

draw your own conclusions. I say nothing, but I think a good deal.

--I came back to the Bunker Hill Monument.--I often think--I said--of

the dynasty which is to reign in its shadow for some thousands of years,

it may be.

The “Man of Letters,” so called, asked me, in a tone I did not exactly

like, whether I expected to live long enough to see a monarchy take the

place of a republic in this country.

--No,--said I,--I was thinking of something very different. I was

indulging a fancy of mine about the Man who is to sit at the foot of the

monument for one, or it may be two or three thousand years. As long as

the monument stands and there is a city near it, there will always be

a man to take the names of visitors and extract some small tribute from

their pockets, I suppose. I sometimes get thinking of the long,

unbroken succession of these men, until they come to look like one Man;

continuous in being, unchanging as the stone he watches, looking upon

the successive generations of human beings as they come and go, and

outliving all the dynasties of the world in all probability. It has come

to such a pass that I never speak to the Man of the Monument without

wanting to take my hat off and feeling as if I were looking down a vista

of twenty or thirty centuries.

The “Man of Letters,” so called, said, in a rather contemptuous way,

I thought, that he had n't got so far as that. He was n't quite up to

moral reflections on toll-men and ticket-takers. Sentiment was n't his

tap.

He looked round triumphantly for a response: but the Capitalist was a

little hard of hearing just then; the Register of Deeds was browsing

on his food in the calm bovine abstraction of a quadruped, and paid no

attention; the Salesman had bolted his breakfast, and whisked himself

away with that peculiar alacrity which belongs to the retail dealer's

assistant; and the Member of the Haouse, who had sometimes seemed to be

impressed with his “tahlented mahn's” air of superiority to the rest of

us, looked as if he thought the speaker was not exactly parliamentary.

So he failed to make his point, and reddened a little, and was not in

the best humor, I thought, when he left the table. I hope he will not

let off any of his irritation on our poor little Scheherezade; but the

truth is, the first person a man of this sort (if he is what I think

him) meets, when he is out of humor, has to be made a victim of, and I

only hope our Young Girl will not have to play Jephthah's daughter.

And that leads me to say, I cannot help thinking that the kind of

criticism to which this Young Girl has been subjected from some person

or other, who is willing to be smart at her expense, is hurtful and not

wholesome. The question is a delicate one. So many foolish persons are

rushing into print, that it requires a kind of literary police to hold

them back and keep them in order. Where there are mice there must be

cats, and where there are rats we may think it worth our while to keep

a terrier, who will give them a shake and let them drop, with all the

mischief taken out of them. But the process is a rude and cruel one at

best, and it too often breeds a love of destructiveness for its own sake

in those who get their living by it. A poor poem or essay does not do

much harm after all; nobody reads it who is like to be seriously hurt

by it. But a sharp criticism with a drop of witty venom in it stings a

young author almost to death, and makes an old one uncomfortable to no

purpose. If it were my business to sit in judgment on my neighbors,

I would try to be courteous, at least, to those who had done any good

service, but, above all, I would handle tenderly those young authors

who are coming before the public in the flutter of their first or early

appearance, and are in the trembling delirium of stage-fright already.

Before you write that brilliant notice of some alliterative Angelina's

book of verses, I wish you would try this experiment.

Take half a sheet of paper and copy upon it any of Angelina's

stanzas,--the ones you were going to make fun of, if you will. Now go

to your window, if it is a still day, open it, and let the half-sheet

of paper drop on the outside. How gently it falls through the soft

air, always tending downwards, but sliding softly, from side to side,

wavering, hesitating, balancing, until it settles as noiselessly as a

snow-flake upon the all-receiving bosom of the earth! Just such would

have been the fate of poor Angelina's fluttering effort, if you had left

it to itself. It would have slanted downward into oblivion so sweetly

and softly that she would have never known when it reached that harmless

consummation.

Our epizoic literature is becoming so extensive that nobody is safe from

its ad infinitum progeny. A man writes a book of criticisms. A Quarterly

Review criticises the critic. A Monthly Magazine takes up the critic's

critic. A Weekly Journal criticises the critic of the critic's

critic, and a daily paper favors us with some critical remarks on the

performance of the writer in the Weekly, who has criticised the critical

notice in the Monthly of the critical essay in the Quarterly on the

critical work we started with. And thus we see that as each flea “has

smaller fleas that on him prey,” even the critic himself cannot escape

the common lot of being bitten. Whether all this is a blessing or a

curse, like that one which made Pharaoh and all his household run to

their toilet-tables, is a question about which opinions might differ.

The physiologists of the time of Moses--if there were vivisectors other

than priests in those days--would probably have considered that other

plague, of the frogs, as a fortunate opportunity for science, as this

poor little beast has been the souffre-douleur of experimenters and

schoolboys from time immemorial.

But there is a form of criticism to which none will object. It is

impossible to come before a public so alive with sensibilities as this

we live in, with the smallest evidence of a sympathetic disposition,

without making friends in a very unexpected way. Everywhere there are

minds tossing on the unquiet waves of doubt. If you confess to the same

perplexities and uncertainties that torture them, they are grateful for

your companionship. If you have groped your way out of the wilderness

in which you were once wandering with them, they will follow your

footsteps, it may be, and bless you as their deliverer. So, all at once,

a writer finds he has a parish of devout listeners, scattered, it is

true, beyond the reach of any summons but that of a trumpet like the

archangel's, to whom his slight discourse may be of more value than the

exhortations they hear from the pulpit, if these last do not happen to

suit their special needs. Young men with more ambition and intelligence

than force of character, who have missed their first steps in life and

are stumbling irresolute amidst vague aims and changing purposes, hold

out their hands, imploring to be led into, or at least pointed towards,

some path where they can find a firm foothold. Young women born into a

chilling atmosphere of circumstance which keeps all the buds of their

nature unopened and always striving to get to a ray of sunshine, if

one finds its way to their neighborhood, tell their stories, sometimes

simply and touchingly, sometimes in a more or less affected and

rhetorical way, but still stories of defeated and disappointed instincts

which ought to make any moderately impressible person feel very tenderly

toward them.

In speaking privately to these young persons, many of whom have literary

aspirations, one should be very considerate of their human feelings. But

addressing them collectively a few plain truths will not give any one

of them much pain. Indeed, almost every individual among them will feel

sure that he or she is an exception to those generalities which apply so

well to the rest.

If I were a literary Pope sending out an Encyclical, I would tell these

inexperienced persons that nothing is so frequent as to mistake an

ordinary human gift for a special and extraordinary endowment. The

mechanism of breathing and that of swallowing are very wonderful, and

if one had seen and studied them in his own person only, he might

well think himself a prodigy. Everybody knows these and other

bodily faculties are common gifts; but nobody except editors and

school-teachers and here and there a literary than knows how common

is the capacity of rhyming and prattling in readable prose, especially

among young women of a certain degree of education. In my character of

Pontiff, I should tell these young persons that most of them labored

under a delusion. It is very hard to believe it; one feels so full

of intelligence and so decidedly superior to one's dull relations and

schoolmates; one writes so easily and the lines sound so prettily to

one's self; there are such felicities of expression, just like those we

hear quoted from the great poets; and besides one has been told by

so many friends that all one had to do was to print and be famous!

Delusion, my poor dear, delusion at least nineteen times out of twenty,

yes, ninety-nine times in a hundred.

But as private father confessor, I always allow as much as I can for the

one chance in the hundred. I try not to take away all hope, unless the

case is clearly desperate, and then to direct the activities into some

other channel.

Using kind language, I can talk pretty freely. I have counselled more

than one aspirant after literary fame to go back to his tailor's board

or his lapstone. I have advised the dilettanti, whose foolish friends

praised their verses or their stories, to give up all their deceptive

dreams of making a name by their genius, and go to work in the study of

a profession which asked only for the diligent use of average;

ordinary talents. It is a very grave responsibility which these unknown

correspondents throw upon their chosen counsellors. One whom you have

never seen, who lives in a community of which you know nothing, sends

you specimens more or less painfully voluminous of his writings, which

he asks you to read over, think over, and pray over, and send back an

answer informing him whether fame and fortune are awaiting him as the

possessor of the wonderful gifts his writings manifest, and whether

you advise him to leave all,--the shop he sweeps out every morning, the

ledger he posts, the mortar in which he pounds, the bench at which he

urges the reluctant plane,--and follow his genius whithersoever it may

lead him. The next correspondent wants you to mark out a whole course

of life for him, and the means of judgment he gives you are about as

adequate as the brick which the simpleton of old carried round as an

advertisement of the house he had to sell. My advice to all the young

men that write to me depends somewhat on the handwriting and spelling.

If these are of a certain character, and they have reached a mature age,

I recommend some honest manual calling, such as they have very probably

been bred to, and which will, at least, give them a chance of becoming

President of the United States by and by, if that is any object to them.

What would you have done with the young person who called on me a good

many years ago, so many that he has probably forgotten his literary

effort,--and read as specimens of his literary workmanship lines like

those which I will favor you with presently? He was an able-bodied,

grown-up young person, whose ingenuousness interested me; and I am sure

if I thought he would ever be pained to see his maiden effort in print,

I would deny myself the pleasure of submitting it to the reader. The

following is an exact transcript of the lines he showed me, and which I

took down on the spot:

“Are you in the vein for cider?

Are you in the tune for pork?

Hist! for Betty's cleared the larder

And turned the pork to soap.”

Do not judge too hastily this sincere effort of a maiden muse. Here was

a sense of rhythm, and an effort in the direction of rhyme; here was an

honest transcript of an occurrence of daily life, told with a certain

idealizing expression, recognizing the existence of impulses, mysterious

instincts, impelling us even in the selection of our bodily sustenance.

But I had to tell him that it wanted dignity of incident and grace of

narrative, that there was no atmosphere to it, nothing of the light that

never was and so forth. I did not say this in these very words, but I

gave him to understand, without being too hard upon him, that he had

better not desert his honest toil in pursuit of the poet's bays. This,

it must be confessed, was a rather discouraging case. A young person

like this may pierce, as the Frenchmen say, by and by, but the chances

are all the other way.

I advise aimless young men to choose some profession without needless

delay, and so get into a good strong current of human affairs, and

find themselves bound up in interests with a compact body of their

fellow-men.

I advise young women who write to me for counsel,--perhaps I do not

advise them at all, only sympathize a little with them, and listen to

what they have to say (eight closely written pages on the average, which

I always read from beginning to end, thinking of the widow's cruse and

myself in the character of Elijah) and--and--come now, I don't believe

Methuselah would tell you what he said in his letters to young ladies,

written when he was in his nine hundred and sixty-ninth year.

But, dear me! how much work all this private criticism involves! An

editor has only to say “respectfully declined,” and there is the end of

it. But the confidential adviser is expected to give the reasons of his

likes and dislikes in detail, and sometimes to enter into an argument

for their support. That is more than any martyr can stand, but what

trials he must go through, as it is! Great bundles of manuscripts, verse

or prose, which the recipient is expected to read, perhaps to recommend

to a publisher, at any rate to express a well-digested and agreeably

flavored opinion about; which opinion, nine times out of ten, disguise

it as we may, has to be a bitter draught; every form of egotism,

conceit, false sentiment, hunger for notoriety, and eagerness for

display of anserine plumage before the admiring public;--all these come

in by mail or express, covered with postage-stamps of so much more cost

than the value of the waste words they overlie, that one comes at last

to groan and change color at the very sight of a package, and to dread

the postman's knock as if it were that of the other visitor whose naked

knuckles rap at every door.

Still there are experiences which go far towards repaying all these

inflictions. My last young man's case looked desperate enough; some of

his sails had blown from the rigging, some were backing in the wind, and

some were flapping and shivering, but I told him which way to head, and

to my surprise he promised to do just as I directed, and I do not doubt

is under full sail at this moment.

What if I should tell my last, my very recent experience with the other

sex? I received a paper containing the inner history of a young woman's

life, the evolution of her consciousness from its earliest record of

itself, written so thoughtfully, so sincerely, with so much firmness and

yet so much delicacy, with such truth of detail and such grace in the

manner of telling, that I finished the long manuscript almost at a

sitting, with a pleasure rarely, almost never experienced in voluminous

communications which one has to spell out of handwriting. This was from

a correspondent who made my acquaintance by letter when she was little

more than a child, some years ago. How easy at that early period to have

silenced her by indifference, to have wounded her by a careless epithet,

perhaps even to have crushed her as one puts his heel on a weed! A very

little encouragement kept her from despondency, and brought back one of

those overflows of gratitude which make one more ashamed of himself

for being so overpaid than he would be for having committed any of the

lesser sins. But what pleased me most in the paper lately received was

to see how far the writer had outgrown the need of any encouragement of

mine; that she had strengthened out of her tremulous questionings into a

self-reliance and self-poise which I had hardly dared to anticipate for

her. Some of my readers who are also writers have very probably had

more numerous experiences of this kind than I can lay claim to;

self-revelations from unknown and sometimes nameless friends, who write

from strange corners where the winds have wafted some stray words of

theirs which have lighted in the minds and reached the hearts of those

to whom they were as the angel that stirred the pool of Bethesda.

Perhaps this is the best reward authorship brings; it may not imply much

talent or literary excellence, but it means that your way of thinking

and feeling is just what some one of your fellow-creatures needed.

--I have been putting into shape, according to his request, some further

passages from the Young Astronomer's manuscript, some of which the

reader will have a chance to read if he is so disposed. The conflict in

the young man's mind between the desire for fame and the sense of its

emptiness as compared with nobler aims has set me thinking about the

subject from a somewhat humbler point of view. As I am in the habit of

telling you, Beloved, many of my thoughts, as well as of repeating what

was said at our table, you may read what follows as if it were addressed

to you in the course of an ordinary conversation, where I claimed rather

more than my share, as I am afraid I am a little in the habit of doing.

I suppose we all, those of us who write in verse or prose, have the

habitual feeling that we should like to be remembered. It is to be awake

when all of those who were round us have been long wrapped in slumber.

It is a pleasant thought enough that the name by which we have been

called shall be familiar on the lips of those who come after us, and the

thoughts that wrought themselves out in our intelligence, the emotions

that trembled through our frames, shall live themselves over again in

the minds and hearts of others.

But is there not something of rest, of calm, in the thought of gently

and gradually fading away out of human remembrance? What line have we

written that was on a level with our conceptions? What page of ours that

does not betray some weakness we would fain have left unrecorded? To

become a classic and share the life of a language is to be ever open to

criticisms, to comparisons, to the caprices of successive generations,

to be called into court and stand a trial before a new jury, once or

more than once in every century. To be forgotten is to sleep in peace

with the undisturbed myriads, no longer subject to the chills and heats,

the blasts, the sleet, the dust, which assail in endless succession that

shadow of a man which we call his reputation. The line which dying we

could wish to blot has been blotted out for us by a hand so tender, so

patient, so used to its kindly task, that the page looks as fair as if

it had never borne the record of our infirmity or our transgression.

And then so few would be wholly content with their legacy of fame. You

remember poor Monsieur Jacques's complaint of the favoritism shown

to Monsieur Berthier,--it is in that exquisite “Week in a French

Country-House.” “Have you seen his room? Have you seen how large it is?

Twice as large as mine! He has two jugs, a large one and a little one.

I have only one small one. And a tea-service and a gilt Cupid on the

top of his looking-glass.” The famous survivor of himself has had his

features preserved in a medallion, and the slice of his countenance

seems clouded with the thought that it does not belong to a bust; the

bust ought to look happy in its niche, but the statue opposite makes

it feel as if it had been cheated out of half its personality, and the

statue looks uneasy because another stands on a loftier pedestal.

But “Ignotus” and “Miserrimus” are of the great majority in that vast

assembly, that House of Commons whose members are all peers, where to be

forgotten is the standing rule. The dignity of a silent memory is not

to be undervalued. Fame is after all a kind of rude handling, and a

name that is often on vulgar lips seems to borrow something not to be

desired, as the paper money that passes from hand to hand gains somewhat

which is a loss thereby. O sweet, tranquil refuge of oblivion, so far

as earth is concerned, for us poor blundering, stammering, misbehaving

creatures who cannot turn over a leaf of our life's diary without

feeling thankful that its failure can no longer stare us in the face!

Not unwelcome shall be the baptism of dust which hides forever the name

that was given in the baptism of water! We shall have good company whose

names are left unspoken by posterity. “Who knows whether the best of men

be known, or whether there be not more remarkable persons forgot than

any that stand remembered in the known account of time? The greater part

must be content to be as though they had not been; to be found in the

register of God, not in the record of man. Twenty-seven names make up

the first story before the flood, and the recorded names ever since

contain not one living century.”

I have my moods about such things as the Young Astronomer has, as we all

have. There are times when the thought of becoming utterly nothing to

the world we knew so well and loved so much is painful and oppressive;

we gasp as if in a vacuum, missing the atmosphere of life we have so

long been in the habit of breathing. Not the less are there moments

when the aching need of repose comes over us and the requiescat in pace,

heathen benediction as it is, sounds more sweetly in our ears than all

the promises that Fame can hold out to us.

I wonder whether it ever occurred to you to reflect upon another horror

there must be in leaving a name behind you. Think what a horrid piece of

work the biographers make of a man's private history! Just imagine the

subject of one of those extraordinary fictions called biographies coming

back and reading the life of himself, written very probably by somebody

or other who thought he could turn a penny by doing it, and having the

pleasure of seeing

“His little bark attendant sail,

Pursue the triumph and partake the gale.”

The ghost of the person condemned to walk the earth in a biography

glides into a public library, and goes to the shelf where his mummied

life lies in its paper cerements. I can see the pale shadow glancing

through the pages and hear the comments that shape themselves in the

bodiless intelligence as if they were made vocal by living lips.

“Born in July, 1776!” And my honored father killed at the battle of

Bunker Hill! Atrocious libeller! to slander one's family at the start

after such a fashion!

“The death of his parents left him in charge of his Aunt Nancy, whose

tender care took the place of those parental attentions which should

have guided and protected his infant years, and consoled him for the

severity of another relative.”

--Aunt Nancy! It was Aunt Betsey, you fool! Aunt Nancy used to--she has

been dead these eighty years, so there is no use in mincing matters--she

used to keep a bottle and a stick, and when she had been tasting a drop

out of the bottle the stick used to come off the shelf and I had to

taste that. And here she is made a saint of, and poor Aunt Betsey, that

did everything for me, is slandered by implication as a horrid tyrant.

“The subject of this commemorative history was remarkable for a

precocious development of intelligence. An old nurse who saw him at the

very earliest period of his existence is said to have spoken of him as

one of the most promising infants she had seen in her long experience.

At school he was equally remarkable, and at a tender age he received a

paper adorned with a cut, inscribed REWARD OF MERIT.”

--I don't doubt the nurse said that,--there were several promising

children born about that time. As for cuts, I got more from the

schoolmaster's rattan than in any other shape. Didn't one of my teachers

split a Gunter's scale into three pieces over the palm of my hand?

And didn't I grin when I saw the pieces fly? No humbug, now, about my

boyhood!

“His personal appearance was not singularly prepossessing. Inconspicuous

in stature and unattractive in features.”

--You misbegotten son of an ourang and grandson of an ascidian (ghosts

keep up with science, you observe), what business have you to be holding

up my person to the contempt of my posterity? Haven't I been sleeping

for this many a year in quiet, and don't the dandelions and buttercups

look as yellow over me as over the best-looking neighbor I have in the

dormitory? Why do you want to people the minds of everybody that reads

your good-for-nothing libel which you call a “biography” with your

impudent caricatures of a man who was a better-looking fellow than

yourself, I 'll bet you ten to one, a man whom his Latin tutor called

fommosus puer when he was only a freshman? If that's what it means to

make a reputation,--to leave your character and your person, and the

good name of your sainted relatives, and all you were, and all you had

and thought and felt, so far as can be gathered by digging you out

of your most private records, to be manipulated and bandied about and

cheapened in the literary market as a chicken or a turkey or a goose is

handled and bargained over at a provision stall, is n't it better to be

content with the honest blue slate-stone and its inscription informing

posterity that you were a worthy citizen and a respected father of a

family?

--I should like to see any man's biography with corrections and

emendations by his ghost. We don't know each other's secrets quite so

well as we flatter ourselves we do. We don't always know our own secrets

as well as we might. You have seen a tree with different grafts upon it,

an apple or a pear tree we will say. In the late summer months the fruit

on one bough will ripen; I remember just such a tree, and the early

ripening fruit was the Jargonelle. By and by the fruit of another

bough will begin to come into condition; the lovely Saint Michael, as

I remember, grew on the same stock as the Jargonelle in the tree I am

thinking of; and then, when these have all fallen or been gathered,

another, we will say the Winter Nelis, has its turn, and so out of the

same juices have come in succession fruits of the most varied aspects

and flavors. It is the same thing with ourselves, but it takes us a

long while to find it out. The various inherited instincts ripen in

succession. You may be nine tenths paternal at one period of your life,

and nine tenths maternal at another. All at once the traits of some

immediate ancestor may come to maturity unexpectedly on one of the

branches of your character, just as your features at different periods

of your life betray different resemblances to your nearer or more remote

relatives.

But I want you to let me go back to the Bunker Hill Monument and the

dynasty of twenty or thirty centuries whose successive representatives

are to sit in the gate, like the Jewish monarchs, while the people shall

come by hundreds and by thousands to visit the memorial shaft until the

story of Bunker's Hill is as old as that of Marathon.

Would not one like to attend twenty consecutive soirees, at each one of

which the lion of the party should be the Man of the Monument, at the

beginning of each century, all the way, we will say, from Anno Domini

2000 to Ann. Dom. 4000,--or, if you think the style of dating will be

changed, say to Ann. Darwinii (we can keep A. D. you see) 1872? Will the

Man be of the Indian type, as President Samuel Stanhope Smith and others

have supposed the transplanted European will become by and by? Will he

have shortened down to four feet and a little more, like the Esquimaux,

or will he have been bred up to seven feet by the use of new chemical

diets, ozonized and otherwise improved atmospheres, and animal

fertilizers? Let us summon him in imagination and ask him a few

questions.

Is n't it like splitting a toad out of a rock to think of this man

of nineteen or twenty centuries hence coming out from his stony

dwelling-place and speaking with us? What are the questions we should

ask him? He has but a few minutes to stay. Make out your own list; I

will set down a few that come up to me as I write.

--What is the prevalent religious creed of civilization?

--Has the planet met with any accident of importance?

--How general is the republican form of government?

--Do men fly yet?

--Has the universal language come into use?

--Is there a new fuel since the English coal-mines have given out?

--Is the euthanasia a recognized branch of medical science?

--Is the oldest inhabitant still living?

--Is the Daily Advertiser still published?

--And the Evening Transcript?

--Is there much inquiry for the works of a writer of the nineteenth

century (Old Style) by--the name of--of--

My tongue cleaves to the roof of my mouth. I cannot imagine the putting

of that question without feeling the tremors which shake a wooer as

he falters out the words the answer to which will make him happy or

wretched.

Whose works was I going to question him about, do you ask me? Oh, the

writings of a friend of mine, much esteemed by his relatives and others.

But it's of no consequence, after all; I think he says he does not care

much for posthumous reputation.

I find something of the same interest in thinking about one of the

boarders at our table that I find in my waking dreams concerning the

Man of the Monument. This personage is the Register of Deeds. He is an

unemotional character, living in his business almost as exclusively as

the Scarabee, but without any of that eagerness and enthusiasm which

belong to our scientific specialist. His work is largely, principally,

I may say, mechanical. He has developed, however, a certain amount of

taste for the antiquities of his department, and once in a while brings

out some curious result of his investigations into ancient documents.

He too belongs to a dynasty which will last as long as there is such a

thing as property in land and dwellings. When that is done away with,

and we return to the state of villanage, holding our tenement-houses,

all to be of the same pattern, of the State, that is to say, of the

Tammany Ring which is to take the place of the feudal lord,--the office

of Register of Deeds will, I presume, become useless, and the dynasty

will be deposed.

As we grow older we think more and more of old persons and of old things

and places. As to old persons, it seems as if we never know how much

they have to tell until we are old ourselves and they have been gone

twenty or thirty years. Once in a while we come upon some survivor of

his or her generation that we have overlooked, and feel as if we

had recovered one of the lost books of Livy or fished up the golden

candlestick from the ooze of the Tiber. So it was the other day after

my reminiscences of the old gambrel-roofed house and its visitors. They

found an echo in the recollections of one of the brightest and liveliest

of my suburban friends, whose memory is exact about everything except

her own age, which, there can be no doubt, she makes out a score or two

of years more than it really is. Still she was old enough to touch some

lights--and a shadow or two--into the portraits I had drawn, which

made me wish that she and not I had been the artist who sketched the

pictures. Among the lesser regrets that mingle with graver sorrows for

the friends of an earlier generation we have lost, are our omissions to

ask them so many questions they could have answered easily enough, and

would have been pleased to be asked. There! I say to myself sometimes,

in an absent mood, I must ask her about that. But she of whom I am now

thinking has long been beyond the reach of any earthly questioning, and

I sigh to think how easily I could have learned some fact which I should

have been happy to have transmitted with pious care to those who are

to come after me. How many times I have heard her quote the line about

blessings brightening as they take their flight, and how true it proves

in many little ways that one never thinks of until it is too late.

The Register of Deeds is not himself advanced in years. But he borrows

an air of antiquity from the ancient records which are stored in his

sepulchral archives. I love to go to his ossuary of dead transactions,

as I would visit the catacombs of Rome or Paris. It is like wandering

up the Nile to stray among the shelves of his monumental folios. Here

stands a series of volumes, extending over a considerable number of

years, all of which volumes are in his handwriting. But as you go

backward there is a break, and you come upon the writing of another

person, who was getting old apparently, for it is beginning to be a

little shaky, and then you know that you have gone back as far as the

last days of his predecessor. Thirty or forty years more carry you to

the time when this incumbent began the duties of his office; his hand

was steady then; and the next volume beyond it in date betrays the work

of a still different writer. All this interests me, but I do not see how

it is going to interest my reader. I do not feel very happy about the

Register of Deeds. What can I do with him? Of what use is he going to be

in my record of what I have seen and heard at the breakfast-table? The

fact of his being one of the boarders was not so important that I was

obliged to speak of him, and I might just as well have drawn on my

imagination and not allowed this dummy to take up the room which another

guest might have profitably filled at our breakfast-table.

I suppose he will prove a superfluity, but I have got him on my hands,

and I mean that he shall be as little in the way as possible. One always

comes across people in actual life who have no particular business to

be where we find them, and whose right to be at all is somewhat

questionable.

I am not going to get rid of the Register of Deeds by putting him out of

the way; but I confess I do not see of what service he is going to be to

me in my record. I have often found, however, that the Disposer of men

and things understands much better than we do how to place his pawns

and other pieces on the chess-board of life. A fish more or less in the

ocean does not seem to amount to much. It is not extravagant to say that

any one fish may be considered a supernumerary. But when Captain

Coram's ship sprung a leak and the carpenter could not stop it, and the

passengers had made up their minds that it was all over with them, all

at once, without any apparent reason, the pumps began gaining on the

leak, and the sinking ship to lift herself out of the abyss which was

swallowing her up. And what do you think it was that saved the ship, and

Captain Coram, and so in due time gave to London that Foundling Hospital

which he endowed, and under the floor of which he lies buried? Why, it

was that very supernumerary fish, which we held of so little account,

but which had wedged itself into the rent of the yawning planks, and

served to keep out the water until the leak was finally stopped.

I am very sure it was Captain Coram, but I almost hope it was somebody

else, in order to give some poor fellow who is lying in wait for the

periodicals a chance to correct me. That will make him happy for a

month, and besides, he will not want to pick a quarrel about anything

else if he has that splendid triumph. You remember Alcibiades and his

dog's tail.

Here you have the extracts I spoke of from the manuscript placed in my

hands for revision and emendation. I can understand these alternations

of feeling in a young person who has been long absorbed in a single

pursuit, and in whom the human instincts which have been long silent

are now beginning to find expression. I know well what he wants; a great

deal better, I think, than he knows himself.

The Poet at the Breakfast-Table · 第 31 / 54 题