I said nothing, but looked the question, What are you laughing at?

--Why, I laughed because I couldn't help saying to myself that a woman

whose mind was taken up with thinking how she looked, and how her pretty

neighbor looked, wouldn't have a great deal of thought to spare for all

your fine discourse.

--Come, now,--said I,--a man who contradicts himself in the course of

two minutes must have a screw loose in his mental machinery. I never

feel afraid that such a thing can happen to me, though it happens often

enough when I turn a thought over suddenly, as you did that five-cent

piece the other day, that it reads differently on its two sides. What I

meant to say is something like this. A woman, notwithstanding she is the

best of listeners, knows her business, and it is a woman's business to

please. I don't say that it is not her business to vote, but I do say

that a woman who does not please is a false note in the harmonies of

nature. She may not have youth, or beauty, or even manner; but she must

have something in her voice or expression, or both, which it makes you

feel better disposed towards your race to look at or listen to. She

knows that as well as we do; and her first question after you have been

talking your soul into her consciousness is, Did I please? A woman never

forgets her sex. She would rather talk with a man than an angel, any

day.

--This frightful speech of mine reached the ear of our Scheherezade, who

said that it was perfectly shocking and that I deserved to be shown up

as the outlaw in one of her bandit stories.

Hush, my dear,--said the Lady,--you will have to bring John Milton

into your story with our friend there, if you punish everybody who

says naughty things like that. Send the little boy up to my chamber for

Paradise Lost, if you please. He will find it lying on my table. The

little old volume,--he can't mistake it.

So the girl called That Boy round and gave him the message; I don't know

why she should give it, but she did, and the Lady helped her out with a

word or two.

The little volume--its cover protected with soft white leather from a

long kid glove, evidently suggesting the brilliant assemblies of the

days when friends and fortune smiled-came presently and the Lady opened

it.--You may read that, if you like, she said,--it may show you that

our friend is to be pilloried in good company.

The Young Girl ran her eye along the passage the Lady pointed out,

blushed, laughed, and slapped the book down as though she would have

liked to box the ears of Mr. John Milton, if he had been a contemporary

and fellow-contributor to the “Weekly Bucket.”--I won't touch the

thing,--she said.--He was a horrid man to talk so: and he had as many

wives as Blue-Beard.

--Fair play,--said the Master.--Bring me the book, my little fractional

superfluity,--I mean you, my nursling,--my boy, if that suits your small

Highness better.

The Boy brought the book.

The old Master, not unfamiliar with the great epic opened pretty nearly

to the place, and very soon found the passage: He read, aloud with grand

scholastic intonation and in a deep voice that silenced the table as if

a prophet had just uttered Thus saith the Lord:--

“So spake our sire, and by his countenance seemed

Entering on studious thoughts abstruse; which Eve

Perceiving--”

went to water her geraniums, to make a short story of it, and left

the two “conversationists,” to wit, the angel Raphael and the

gentleman,--there was but one gentleman in society then, you know,--to

talk it out.

“Yet went she not, as not with such discourse

Delighted, or not capable her ear

Of what was high; such pleasure she reserved,

Adam relating, she sole auditress;

Her husband the relater she preferred

Before the angel, and of him to ask

Chose rather; he she knew would intermix

Grateful digressions, and solve high dispute

With conjugal caresses: from his lips

Not words alone pleased her.”

Everybody laughed, except the Capitalist, who was a little hard of

hearing, and the Scarabee, whose life was too earnest for demonstrations

of that kind. He had his eyes fixed on the volume, however, with eager

interest.

--The p'int 's carried,--said the Member of the Haouse.

Will you let me look at that book a single minute?--said the Scarabee.

I passed it to him, wondering what in the world he wanted of Paradise

Lost.

Dermestes lardarius,--he said, pointing to a place where the edge of one

side of the outer cover had been slightly tasted by some insect.--Very

fond of leather while they 're in the larva state.

--Damage the goods as bad as mice,--said the Salesman.

--Eat half the binding off Folio 67,--said the Register of Deeds.

Something did, anyhow, and it was n't mice. Found the shelf covered with

little hairy cases belonging to something or other that had no business

there.

Skins of the Dermestes lardaraus,--said the Scarabee,--you can always

tell them by those brown hairy coats. That 's the name to give them.

--What good does it do to give 'em a name after they 've eat the binding

off my folios?--asked the Register of Deeds.

The Scarabee had too much respect for science to answer such a question

as that; and the book, having served its purposes, was passed back to

the Lady.

I return to the previous question,--said I,--if our friend the Member of

the House of Representatives will allow me to borrow the phrase. Womanly

women are very kindly critics, except to themselves and now and then to

their own sex. The less there is of sex about a woman, the more she is

to be dreaded. But take a real woman at her best moment,--well dressed

enough to be pleased with herself, not so resplendent as to be a

show and a sensation, with those varied outside influences which set

vibrating the harmonic notes of her nature stirring in the air about

her, and what has social life to compare with one of those vital

interchanges of thought and feeling with her that make an hour

memorable? What can equal her tact, her delicacy, her subtlety of

apprehension, her quickness to feel the changes of temperature as the

warm and cool currents of talk blow by turns? At one moment she is

microscopically intellectual, critical, scrupulous in judgment as an

analyst's balance, and the next as sympathetic as the open rose that

sweetens the wind from whatever quarter it finds its way to her bosom.

It is in the hospitable soul of a woman that a man forgets he is a

stranger, and so becomes natural and truthful, at the same time that he

is mesmerized by all those divine differences which make her a mystery

and a bewilderment to--

If you fire your popgun at me, you little chimpanzee, I will stick a pin

right through the middle of you and put you into one of this gentleman's

beetle-cases!

I caught the imp that time, but what started him was more than I could

guess. It is rather hard that this spoiled child should spoil such a

sentence as that was going to be; but the wind shifted all at once, and

the talk had to come round on another tack, or at least fall off a point

or two from its course.

--I'll tell you who I think are the best talkers in all probability,

--said I to the Master, who, as I mentioned, was developing interesting

talent as a listener,--poets who never write verses. And there are a

good many more of these than it would seem at first sight. I think you

may say every young lover is a poet, to begin with. I don't mean either

that all young lovers are good talkers,--they have an eloquence all

their own when they are with the beloved object, no doubt, emphasized

after the fashion the solemn bard of Paradise refers to with such

delicious humor in the passage we just heard,--but a little talk goes a

good way in most of these cooing matches, and it wouldn't do to report

them too literally. What I mean is, that a man with the gift of musical

and impassioned phrase (and love often deeds that to a young person for

a while), who “wreaks” it, to borrow Byron's word, on conversation as

the natural outlet of his sensibilities and spiritual activities, is

likely to talk better than the poet, who plays on the instrument of

verse. A great pianist or violinist is rarely a great singer. To write

a poem is to expend the vital force which would have made one brilliant

for an hour or two, and to expend it on an instrument with more pipes,

reeds, keys, stops, and pedals than the Great Organ that shakes New

England every time it is played in full blast.

Do you mean that it is hard work to write a poem?--said the old

Master.--I had an idea that a poem wrote itself, as it were, very

often; that it came by influx, without voluntary effort; indeed, you

have spoken of it as an inspiration rather than a result of volition.

--Did you ever see a great ballet-dancer?--I asked him.

--I have seen Taglioni,--he answered.--She used to take her steps

rather prettily. I have seen the woman that danced the capstone on to

Bunker Hill Monument, as Orpheus moved the rocks by music, the Elssler

woman,--Fanny Elssler. She would dance you a rigadoon or cut a pigeon's

wing for you very respectably.

(Confound this old college book-worm,---he has seen everything!)

Well, did these two ladies dance as if it was hard work to them?

--Why no, I should say they danced as if they liked it and couldn't help

dancing; they looked as if they felt so “corky” it was hard to keep them

down.

--And yet they had been through such work to get their limbs strong and

flexible and obedient, that a cart-horse lives an easy life compared to

theirs while they were in training.

--The Master cut in just here--I had sprung the trap of a reminiscence.

--When I was a boy,--he said,--some of the mothers in our small town,

who meant that their children should know what was what as well as other

people's children, laid their heads together and got a dancing-master to

come out from the city and give instruction at a few dollars a quarter

to the young folks of condition in the village. Some of their husbands

were ministers and some were deacons, but the mothers knew what they

were about, and they did n't see any reason why ministers' and deacons'

wives' children shouldn't have as easy manners as the sons and daughters

of Belial. So, as I tell you, they got a dancing-master to come out to

our place,--a man of good repute, a most respectable man,--madam (to

the Landlady), you must remember the worthy old citizen, in his

advanced age, going about the streets, a most gentlemanly bundle of

infirmities,--only he always cocked his hat a little too much on

one side, as they do here and there along the Connecticut River, and

sometimes on our city sidewalks, when they've got a new beaver; they got

him, I say, to give us boys and girls lessons in dancing and deportment.

He was as gray and as lively as a squirrel, as I remember him, and used

to spring up in the air and “cross his feet,” as we called it, three

times before he came down. Well, at the end of each term there was what

they called an “exhibition ball,” in which the scholars danced cotillons

and country-dances; also something called a “gavotte,” and I think one

or more walked a minuet. But all this is not what--I wanted to say. At

this exhibition ball he used to bring out a number of hoops wreathed

with roses, of the perennial kind, by the aid of which a number of

amazingly complicated and startling evolutions were exhibited; and also

his two daughters, who figured largely in these evolutions, and whose

wonderful performances to us, who had not seen Miss Taglioni or Miss

Elssler, were something quite bewildering, in fact, surpassing the

natural possibilities of human beings. Their extraordinary powers were,

however, accounted for by the following explanation, which was accepted

in the school as entirely satisfactory. A certain little bone in the

ankles of each of these young girls had been broken intentionally,

secundum artem, at a very early age, and thus they had been fitted to

accomplish these surprising feats which threw the achievements of

the children who were left in the condition of the natural man into

ignominious shadow.

--Thank you,--said I,--you have helped out my illustration so as to make

it better than I expected. Let me begin again. Every poem that is worthy

of the name, no matter how easily it seems to be written, represents

a great amount of vital force expended at some time or other. When you

find a beach strewed with the shells and other spoils that belonged once

to the deep sea, you know the tide has been there, and that the winds

and waves have wrestled over its naked sands. And so, if I find a poem

stranded in my soul and have nothing to do but seize it as a wrecker

carries off the treasure he finds cast ashore, I know I have paid at

some time for that poem with some inward commotion, were it only an

excess of enjoyment, which has used up just so much of my vital capital.

But besides all the impressions that furnished the stuff of the poem,

there has been hard work to get the management of that wonderful

instrument I spoke of,--the great organ, language. An artist who works

in marble or colors has them all to himself and his tribe, but the man

who moulds his thought in verse has to employ the materials vulgarized

by everybody's use, and glorify them by his handling. I don't know that

you must break any bones in a poet's mechanism before his thought

can dance in rhythm, but read your Milton and see what training, what

patient labor, it took before he could shape our common speech into his

majestic harmonies.

It is rather singular, but the same kind of thing has happened to me not

very rarely before, as I suppose it has to most persons, that just when

I happened to be thinking about poets and their conditions, this very

morning, I saw a paragraph or two from a foreign paper which is apt to

be sharp, if not cynical, relating to the same matter. I can't help

it; I want to have my talk about it, and if I say the same things that

writer did, somebody else can have the satisfaction of saying I stole

them all.

[I thought the person whom I have called hypothetically the Man

of Letters changed color a little and betrayed a certain awkward

consciousness that some of us were looking at him or thinking of him;

but I am a little suspicious about him and may do him wrong.]

That poets are treated as privileged persons by their admirers and the

educated public can hardly be disputed. That they consider themselves so

there is no doubt whatever. On the whole, I do not know so easy a way of

shirking all the civic and social and domestic duties, as to settle it

in one's mind that one is a poet. I have, therefore, taken great pains

to advise other persons laboring under the impression that they were

gifted beings, destined to soar in the atmosphere of song above the

vulgar realities of earth, not to neglect any homely duty under the

influence of that impression. The number of these persons is so great

that if they were suffered to indulge their prejudice against every-day

duties and labors, it would be a serious loss to the productive

industry of the country. My skirts are clear (so far as other people are

concerned) of countenancing that form of intellectual opium-eating in

which rhyme takes the place of the narcotic. But what are you going to

do when you find John Keats an apprentice to a surgeon or apothecary? Is

n't it rather better to get another boy to sweep out the shop and shake

out the powders and stir up the mixtures, and leave him undisturbed to

write his Ode on a Grecian Urn or to a Nightingale? Oh yes, the critic

I have referred to would say, if he is John Keats; but not if he is of

a much lower grade, even though he be genuine, what there is of him. But

the trouble is, the sensitive persons who belong to the lower grades

of the poetical hierarchy do not--know their own poetical limitations,

while they do feel a natural unfitness and disinclination for many

pursuits which young persons of the average balance of faculties take to

pleasantly enough. What is forgotten is this, that every real poet,

even of the humblest grade, is an artist. Now I venture to say that any

painter or sculptor of real genius, though he may do nothing more than

paint flowers and fruit, or carve cameos, is considered a privileged

person. It is recognized perfectly that to get his best work he must

be insured the freedom from disturbances which the creative power

absolutely demands, more absolutely perhaps in these slighter artists

than in the great masters. His nerves must be steady for him to finish a

rose-leaf or the fold of a nymph's drapery in his best manner; and

they will be unsteadied if he has to perform the honest drudgery which

another can do for him quite as well. And it is just so with the poet,

though he were only finishing an epigram; you must no more meddle

roughly with him than you would shake a bottle of Chambertin and expect

the “sunset glow” to redden your glass unclouded. On the other hand,

it may be said that poetry is not an article of prime necessity, and

potatoes are. There is a disposition in many persons just now to deny

the poet his benefit of clergy, and to hold him no better than other

people. Perhaps he is not, perhaps he is not so good, half the time; but

he is a luxury, and if you want him you must pay for him, by not trying

to make a drudge of him while he is all his lifetime struggling with the

chills and heats of his artistic intermittent fever.

There may have been some lesser interruptions during the talk I have

reported as if it was a set speech, but this was the drift of what I

said and should have said if the other man, in the Review I referred to,

had not seen fit to meddle with the subject, as some fellow always does,

just about the time when I am going to say something about it. The old

Master listened beautifully, except for cutting in once, as I told

you he did. But now he had held in as long as it was in his nature to

contain himself, and must have his say or go off in an apoplexy,

or explode in some way.--I think you're right about the poets,--he

said.--They are to common folks what repeaters are to ordinary watches.

They carry music in their inside arrangements, but they want to be

handled carefully or you put them out of order. And perhaps you must

n't expect them to be quite as good timekeepers as the professional

chronometer watches that make a specialty of being exact within a few

seconds a month. They think too much of themselves. So does everybody

that considers himself as having a right to fall back on what he calls

his idiosyncrasy. Yet a man has such a right, and it is no easy thing to

adjust the private claim to the fair public demand on him. Suppose you

are subject to tic douloureux, for instance. Every now and then a tiger

that nobody can see catches one side of your face between his jaws and

holds on till he is tired and lets go. Some concession must be made to

you on that score, as everybody can see. It is fair to give you a seat

that is not in the draught, and your friends ought not to find

fault with you if you do not care to join a party that is going on a

sleigh-ride. Now take a poet like Cowper. He had a mental neuralgia, a

great deal worse in many respects than tic douloureux confined to the

face. It was well that he was sheltered and relieved, by the cares of

kind friends, especially those good women, from as many of the burdens

of life as they could lift off from him. I am fair to the poets,--don't

you agree that I am?

Why, yes,--I said,--you have stated the case fairly enough, a good deal

as I should have put it myself.

Now, then,--the Master continued,--I 'll tell you what is necessary to

all these artistic idiosyncrasies to bring them into good square human

relations outside of the special province where their ways differ

from those of other people. I am going to illustrate what I mean by a

comparison. I don't know, by the way, but you would be disposed to think

and perhaps call me a wine-bibber on the strength of the freedom with

which I deal with that fluid for the purposes of illustration. But I

make mighty little use of it, except as it furnishes me an image now and

then, as it did, for that matter, to the Disciples and their Master.

In my younger days they used to bring up the famous old wines, the

White-top, the Juno, the Eclipse, the Essex Junior, and the rest, in

their old cobwebbed, dusty bottles. The resurrection of one of these old

sepulchred dignitaries had something of solemnity about it; it was like

the disinterment of a king; the bringing to light of the Royal Martyr

King Charles I., for instance, that Sir Henry Halford gave such an

interesting account of. And the bottle seemed to inspire a personal

respect; it was wrapped in a napkin and borne tenderly and reverently

round to the guests, and sometimes a dead silence went before the first

gush of its amber flood, and

“The boldest held his breath

For a time.”

But nowadays the precious juice of a long-dead vintage is transferred

carefully into a cut-glass decanter, and stands side by side with the

sherry from a corner grocery, which looks just as bright and apparently

thinks just as well of itself. The old historic Madeiras, which have

warmed the periods of our famous rhetoricians of the past and burned

in the impassioned eloquence of our earlier political demigods, have

nothing to mark them externally but a bit of thread, it may be, round

the neck of the decanter, or a slip of ribbon, pink on one of them and

blue on another.

Go to a London club,--perhaps I might find something nearer home that

would serve my turn,--but go to a London club, and there you will see

the celebrities all looking alike modern, all decanted off from

their historic antecedents and their costume of circumstance into the

every-day aspect of the gentleman of common cultivated society. That is

Sir Coeur de Lion Plantagenet in the mutton-chop whiskers and the plain

gray suit; there is the Laureate in a frockcoat like your own, and the

leader of the House of Commons in a necktie you do not envy. That is the

kind of thing you want to take the nonsense out of you. If you are not

decanted off from yourself every few days or weeks, you will think it

sacrilege to brush a cobweb from your cork by and by. O little

fool, that has published a little book full of little poems or other

sputtering tokens of an uneasy condition, how I love you for the one

soft nerve of special sensibility that runs through your exiguous

organism, and the one phosphorescent particle in your unilluminated

intelligence! But if you don't leave your spun-sugar confectionery

business once in a while, and come out among lusty men,--the bristly,

pachydermatous fellows that hew out the highways for the material

progress of society, and the broad-shouldered, out-of-door men that

fight for the great prizes of life,--you will come to think that the

spun-sugar business is the chief end of man, and begin to feel and

look as if you believed yourself as much above common people as that

personage of whom Tourgueneff says that “he had the air of his own

statue erected by national subscription.”

--The Master paused and fell into a deep thinking fit, as he does

sometimes. He had had his own say, it is true, but he had established

his character as a listener to my own perfect satisfaction, for I, too,

was conscious of having preached with a certain prolixity.

--I am always troubled when I think of my very limited mathematical

capacities. It seems as if every well-organized mind should be able to

handle numbers and quantities through their symbols to an indefinite

extent; and yet, I am puzzled by what seems to a clever boy with a turn

for calculation as plain as counting his fingers. I don't think any

man feels well grounded in knowledge unless he has a good basis of

mathematical certainties, and knows how to deal with them and apply them

to every branch of knowledge where they can come in to advantage.

Our Young Astronomer is known for his mathematical ability, and I asked

him what he thought was the difficulty in the minds that are weak in

that particular direction, while they may be of remarkable force in

other provinces of thought, as is notoriously the case with some men of

great distinction in science.

The young man smiled and wrote a few letters and symbols on a piece of

paper.--Can you see through that at once?--he said.

The Poet at the Breakfast-Table · 第 26 / 54 题