As you have talked a good deal in your letter about the college

and its prospects, I suppose I may be allowed to say a few

words about it in reply, though to be sure I have already

said more than was perhaps proper in one like myself, who am

not even a graduate there, and shall very probably get no

other answer to what I may venture to say hereafter than that

I should do better to mind my books, and let those who are

intrusted with the affairs of ye (_sic_) college take care

of them. I cannot, however, shut my eyes on the fact, that

one _very_ important and principal cause of the difference

between our University and the one here is the different

value we affix to a good library, and the different ideas we

have of what a good library is. In America we look on the

Library at Cambridge as a wonder, and I am sure nobody ever

had a more thorough veneration for it than I had; but it was

not necessary for me to be here six months to find out that

it is nearly or quite half a century behind the libraries of

Europe, and that it is much less remarkable that our stock of

learning is so small than that it is so great, considering the

means from which it is drawn are so inadequate. But what is

worse than the absolute poverty of our collections of books

is the relative inconsequence in which we keep them. We found

new professorships and build new colleges in abundance, but

we buy no books; and yet it is to me the most obvious thing

in the world that it would promote the cause of learning and

the reputation of the University ten times more to give six

thousand dollars a year to the Library than to found three

professorships, and that it would have been wiser to have spent

the whole sum that the new chapel had cost on books than on a

fine suite of halls. The truth is, when we build up a literary

Institution in America we think too much of convenience and

comfort and luxury and show; and too little of real, laborious

study and the means that will promote it. We have not yet

learnt that the Library is not only the first convenience of

a University, but that it is the very first necessity,—that

it is the life and spirit,—and that all other considerations

must yield to the prevalent one of increasing and opening it,

and opening it on the most liberal terms to _all_ who are

disposed to make use of it. I cannot better explain to you the

difference between our University in Cambridge and the one

here than by telling you that here I hardly say too much when

I say that it _consists_ in the Library, and that in Cambridge

the Library is one of the last things thought and talked

about,—that here they have forty professors and more than two

hundred thousand volumes to instruct them, and in Cambridge

twenty professors and less than twenty thousand volumes. This,

then, you see is the thing of which I am disposed to complain,

that we give comparatively so little attention and money to

the Library, which is, after all, the Alpha and Omega of the

whole establishment,—that we are mortified and exasperated

because we have no learned men, and yet make it _physically_

impossible for our scholars to become such, and that to escape

from this reproach we appoint a multitude of professors, but

give them a library from which hardly one and _not_ one of them

can qualify himself to execute the duties of his office. You

will, perhaps, say that these professors do not complain. I

can only answer that you find the blind are often as gay and

happy as those who are blessed with sight; but take a Cambridge

professor, and let him live one year by a library as ample and

as liberally administered as this is; let him know what it is

to be forever sure of having the very book he wants either to

read or to refer to; let him in one word _know_ that he can

never be discouraged from pursuing any inquiry for want of

means, but on the contrary let him feel what it is to have all

the excitements and assistance and encouragements which those

who have gone before him in the same pursuits can give him,

and then at the end of this year set him down again under the

parsimonious administration of the Cambridge library,—and I

will promise you that he shall be as discontented and clamorous

as my argument can desire.

But I will trouble you no more with my argument, though I

am persuaded that the further progress of learning among us

depends on the entire change of the system against which it is

directed.

The next extract is from a letter of Cogswell’s, and gives a glimpse at

the actual work done by these young men:—

GÖTTINGEN, March 8, 1817.

I must tell you something about our colony at Göttingen before

I discuss other subjects, for you probably care little about

the University and its host of professors, except as they

operate upon us. First as to the Professor (Everett) and Dr.

Ticknor, as they are called here; everybody knows them in this

part of Germany, and also knows how to value them. For once

in my life I am proud to acknowledge myself an American on

the European side of the Atlantic: never was a country more

fortunate in its representation abroad than ours has been in

this instance; they will gain more for us in this respect than

even in the treasures of learning they will carry back. Little

as I have of patriotism, I delight to listen to the character

which is here given of my countrymen; I mean as countrymen, and

not as my particular friends: the despondency which it produces

in my own mind of ever obtaining a place by their sides is

more than counterbalanced by the gratification of my national

feelings, to say not a word of my individual attachment. You

must not think me extravagant, but I venture to say that the

notions which the European literati have entertained of

America will be essentially changed by G. and E.’s [Ticknor’s

and Everett’s] residence on the Continent; we were known to be

a brave, a rich, and an enterprising people, but that a scholar

was to be found among us, or any man who had a desire to be a

scholar, had scarcely been conceived. It will also be the means

of producing new correspondences and connections between the

men of the American and European sides of the Atlantic, and

spread much more widely among us a knowledge of the present

literature and science of this Continent.

Deducting the time from the 13th of December to the 27th of

January during which I was confined to my room, I have been

pretty industrious; through the winter I behaved as well as

one could expect. German has been my chief study; to give it a

relief I have attended one hour a day to a lecture in Italian

on the Modern Arts, and, to feel satisfied that I had some

sober inquiry in hand, I have devoted another to Professor

Saalfeld’s course of European Statistics, so that I have

generally been able to count at night twelve hours of private

study and private instruction. This has only sharpened not

satisfied my appetite. I have laid out for myself a course of

more diligent labors the next semester. I shall then be at

least eight hours in the lecture rooms, beginning at six in

the morning. I must contrive, besides, to devote eight other

hours to private study. I am not in the least Germanized, and

yet it appalls me when I think of the difference between an

education here and in America. The great evil with us is, in

our primary schools, the best years for learning are trifled

and whiled away; boys learn nothing because they have no

instructors, because we demand of one the full [work?] of

ten, and because laziness is the first lesson which one gets

in all our great schools. I know very well that we want but

few closet scholars, few learned philologists, and few verbal

commentators; that all our systems of government and customs

and life suppose a preparation for making practical men,—men

who move, and are felt in the world; but all this could be

better done without wasting every year from infancy to manhood.

The system of education here is the very reverse of our own:

in America boys are let loose upon the work when they are

children, and fettered when they are sent to our college; here

they are cloistered, too much so I acknowledge, till they

can guide themselves, and then put at their own disposal at

the universities. Luther’s Reformation threw all the monkish

establishments in the Protestant countries into the hands of

the Princes, and they very wisely appropriated them to the

purposes of education, but unluckily they have retained more of

the monastic seclusion than they ought. The three great schools

in Saxony, Pforte, Meissen, and ⸺ are kept in convents, and the

boys enjoy little more than the liberty of a cloister. They are

all very famous, the first more particularly; out of it have

come half of the great scholars of the country. Still they are

essentially defective in the point above named. Just in the

neighborhood of Gotha is the admirable institution of Salzmann,

in a delightfully pleasant and healthy valley; his number is

limited to thirty-eight, and he has twelve instructors,—admits

no boy who does not bring with him the fairest character: when

once admitted they become his children, and the reciprocal

relation is cherished with corresponding tenderness and

respect. I should like to proceed a little farther in this

subject, but the bottom of my paper forbids.

The following is from Ticknor again, and shows, though without giving

details, that the young men had extended their observations beyond

Göttingen:—

GÖTTINGEN, November 30, 1816.

DEAR SIR,—On returning here about a fortnight since, after a

journey through North Germany which had occupied us about two

months, I found your kind letter of August 4 waiting to welcome

me. I thank you for it with all my heart, and take the first

moment of leisure I can find in the busy commencement of a new

term, to answer it, that I may soon have the same pleasure

again.

You say you wish to hear from me what hours of relaxation

I have, and what acquaintances I make, in this part of the

Continent. The first is very easily told, and the last would

not have been difficult before the journey from which I have

just returned; but now the number is more than I can write or

you willingly hear. However, I will answer both your inquiries

in the spirit in which they are made.

As to relaxation, in the sense of the word in which I used to

employ it at home,—meaning the hours I lounged so happily away

when the weariness of the evening came, on your sofa, and the

time I used to pass with my friends in general, I know not how

or why, but always gayly and thoughtlessly,—of this sort of

relaxation I know nothing here but the end of an evening which

I occasionally permit myself to spend with Cogswell, whose

residence here has in this respect changed the whole color of

my life. During the last semester, I used to visit occasionally

at about twenty houses in Göttingen, chiefly as a means of

learning to speak the language. As the population here is so

changeable, and as every man is left to live exactly as he

chooses, it is customary for all those who wish to continue

their intercourse with the persons resident here to make a call

at the beginning of each semester, which is considered a notice

that they are still here and still mean to go into society.

I, however, feel no longer the necessity of visiting for the

purpose of learning German, and now that Cogswell is here

cannot desire it for any other purpose; have made visits only

to three or four of the professors, and shall, therefore, not

go abroad at all. As to exercise, however, I have enough. Three

times a day I must cross the city entirely to get my lessons.

I go out twice besides, a shorter distance for dinner and a

fourth lesson; and four times a week I take an hour’s exercise

for conscience’ sake and my mother’s in the riding-school. Four

times a week I make Cogswell a visit of half an hour after

dinner, and three times I spend from nine to ten in the evening

with him, so that I feel I am doing quite right and quite as

little as I ought to do in giving up the remaining thirteen

hours of the day to study, especially as I gave fourteen to it

last winter without injury.

The journey we have lately taken was for the express purpose

of seeing all the universities or schools of any considerable

name in the country. This in a couple of months we easily

accomplished, and of course saw professors, directors, and

schoolmasters—men of great learning and men of little learning,

and men of no learning at all—in shoals.

This is from Cogswell again, and is certainly a clarion appeal as to the

need of thoroughness in teaching and learning:—

GÖTTINGEN, July 13, 1817.

I hope that you and every other person interested in the

College are reconciled to Mr. Everett’s plan of remaining

longer in Europe than was at first intended, as I am sure

you would be do you know the use he makes of his time, and

the benefit you are all to derive from his learning. Before

I came to Göttingen I used to wonder why it was that he

wished to remain here so long; I now wonder he can consent

to leave so soon. The truth is, you all mistake the cause of

your impatience: you believe that it comes from a desire of

seeing him at work for and giving celebrity to the College,

but it arises from a wish to have him in your society, at

your dinner-tables, at your suppers, your clubs, and your

ladies, at your tea-parties (you perceive I am aiming at Boston

folks): however, all who have formed such expectations must be

disappointed; he will find that most of these gratifications

must be sacrificed to attain the objects of a scholar’s

ambition. What can men think when they say that two years are

sufficient to make a Greek scholar? Does not everybody know

that it is the labor of half a common life to learn to read

the language with tolerable facility? I remember to have heard

little Drisen say, a few days after I came here, that he had

been spending eighteen years, at least sixteen hours a day,

exclusively upon Greek, and that he could not now read a page

of the tragedians without a dictionary. When I went home I

struck Greek from the list of my studies; I now think no more

of attaining it than I do of becoming an astrologer. In fact,

the most heart-breaking circumstance attending upon human

knowledge is that a man can never go any farther than “to know

how little’s to be known”; it fills, then, the mind of scholars

with despair to look upon the map of science, as it does that

of the traveler to look upon the map of the earth, for both see

what a mere speck can be traveled over, and of that speck how

imperfect is the knowledge which is acquired. Let any one who

believes that he has penetrated the mysteries of all science,

and learnt the powers and properties of whatever is contained

in the kingdoms of air, earth, fire, and water, but just bring

his knowledge to the test; let him, for example, begin with

what seems the simplest of all inquiries, and enumerate the

plants which grow upon the surface of the globe, and call them

by their names, and, when he finds that this is beyond his

limits, let him descend to a single class and bring within

it all that the unfathomed caves of ocean and the unclimbed

mountains bear; and as this is also higher than he can reach,

let him go still lower and include only one family, or a

particular species, or an individual plant, and mark his points

of ignorance upon each, and then, if his pride of knowledge is

not humbled enough, let him take but a leaf or the smallest

part of the most common flower, and give a satisfactory

solution for many of the phenomena they exhibit. But, you will

ask, is Göttingen the only place for the acquisition of such

learning? No, not the only, but I believe far the best for

such learning as it is necessary for Mr. E. to fit him to make

Cambridge in some degree a Göttingen, and render it no longer

requisite to depend upon the latter for the formation of their

scholars: it is true that very few of what the Germans call

scholars are needed in America; if there would only be one

thorough one to begin with, the number would soon be sufficient

for all the uses which could be made of them, and for the

literary character of the country. This one, I say, could

never be formed there, because, in the first place, there is

no one who knows how it is to be done; secondly, there are no

books, and then, by the habits of desultory study practiced

there, are wholly incompatible with it. A man as a scholar

must be completely _upset_, to use a blacksmith’s phrase; he

must have learnt to give up his love of society and of social

pleasures, his interest in the common occurrences of life, in

the political and religious contentions of the country, and

in everything not directly connected with his single aim. Is

there any one willing to make such a sacrifice? This I cannot

answer, but I do assure you that it is the sacrifice made by

almost every man of classical learning in Germany, though to be

sure the sacrifice of the enjoyments of friendly intercourse

with mankind to letters is paying much less dear for fame here

than the same thing would be in America. For my own part I am

sorry I came here, because I was too old to be _upset_; like a

horseshoe worn thin, I shall break as soon as I begin to wear

on the other side: it makes me very restless at this period of

my life to find that I know nothing. I would not have wished to

have made the discovery unless I could at the same time have

been allowed to remain in some place where I could get rid of

my ignorance; and, now that I must go from Göttingen, I have no

hope of doing that.

The following from Edward Everett carries the war yet farther into

Africa, and criticises not merely American colleges, but also secondary

schools:—

GÖTTINGEN, September 17, 1817.

You must not laugh at me for proceeding to business the first

thing, and informing you in some sort as an argument, that, if

I have been unreasonable in prolonging my stay here, I have

at least passed my time not wholly to disadvantage,—that I

received this morning my diploma as Doctor of Philosophy of

this University, the first American, and as far as I know,

Englishman, on whom it has ever been conferred. You will

perhaps have heard that it was my intention to have passed

from this University to that of Oxford, and to have spent this

winter there. I have altered this determination for the sake

of joining forces with Theodore Lyman at Paris this winter;

and as he proposes to pass the ensuing summer in traveling in

the South of France, I shall take that opportunity of going to

England. It is true I should have liked to have gone directly

from Göttingen to Oxford, to have kept the thread as it were

unbroken, and gone on with my studies without any interruption.

But I find, even at Paris, that I have no object there but

study; and Professor Gaisford, at Oxford, writes me that it

is every way better that I should be there in summer, as the

Library is open a greater part of the day. Meanwhile, I try to

feel duly grateful to Providence and my friends at home to whom

I owe the opportunity of resorting to the famous fountains of

European wisdom. The only painful feeling I carry with me is

that I may not have health, or strength, or ability to fulfill

the demands which such an opportunity will create and justify.

More is apt to be expected in such cases than it is possible

to perform; besides that, after the schoolmaster is prepared

for his duty, all depends upon whether the schoolboy is also

prepared for his. You must not allow any report to the contrary

to shake your faith in my good-will in the cause. Some remarks

which I committed to paper at the request of my brother upon

the subject of a National University,—an institution which by

exciting an emulation in our quarter would be the best thing

that could happen to Cambridge,—have, I hear, led some good men

to believe that I was for deserting the service at Cambridge

still more promptly than I had done at Boston,—a suggestion

certainly too absurd to have been made, or to need to have been

contradicted. However, still more important than all which

national or state universities can do themselves immediately,

is the necessity we must impose on the schools of reforming

and improving themselves, or, rather, are the steps we must

take to create good schools. All we have are bad, the common

reading and writing ones not excepted; but of schools which we

have to fit boys for college, I think the Boston Latin School

and the Andover Academy are the only ones that deserve the

name, and much I doubt if they deserve it. There is much truth

in the remark so constantly made that we are not old enough

for European perfection, but we are old enough to do well all

it is worth while to do at all; and if a child here in eight

years can read and speak Latin fluently, there is no reason

why our youth, after spending the same time on it, should

know little or nothing about it. Professional education with

us commences little or no earlier than it does here, and yet

we approach it in all departments with a quarter part of the

previous qualification which is here possessed. But also it is

the weakness of mankind to do more than he is obliged to. The

sort of obligation, to be sure, which is felt, differs with

different spirits, and one is content to be the first man in

his ward, one in his town, one in his county, another in his

state. To all these degrees of dignity the present education

is adequate; and we turn out reputable ministers, doctors,

lawyers, professors, and schoolmasters,—men who get to be as

wise at ye (_sic_) age of threescore as their fathers were at

sixty, and who transmit the concern of life to their children

in as good condition as they took it themselves. Meanwhile, the

physical and commercial progress of ye (_sic_) country goes on,

and more numerous doctors and more ministers are turned out,

not more learned ones, to meet it. I blushed burning red to

the ears the other day as a friend here laid his hand upon a

newspaper containing the address of the students at Baltimore

to Mr. Monroe, with the translation of it. It was less matter

that the translation was not English; my German friend could

not detect that. But that the original was not Latin I could

not, alas! conceal. It was, unfortunately, just like enough

to very bad Latin to make it impossible to pass it off for

Kickapoo or Pottawattamy, which I was at first inclined to

attempt. My German persisted in it that it was meant for Latin,

and I wished in my heart that the Baltimore lads would stick to

the example of their fathers and mob the Federalists, so they

would give over this inhuman violence on the poor old Romans. I

say nothing of ye (_sic_) address, for like all [illegible] it

seems to have been ye (_sic_) object, in the majority of those

productions, for those who made them to compliment, not the

President, but themselves. It is a pity Dr. Kirkland’s could

not have been published first, to serve as a model how they

might speak to the President without coldness on one side and

adulation on the other, and of themselves without intrusion or

forwardness.

The following letter transfers Edward Everett to Oxford, and gives in

a somewhat trenchant way his unfavorable criticisms on the English

universities of that day. He subsequently sent his son to Cambridge,

England, but it was forty years later:—

OXFORD, June 6, 1818.

I have been over two Months in England, and am now visiting

Oxford, having passed a Week in Cambridge. There is more

teaching and more learning in our American Cambridge than

there is in both the English Universities together, tho’

between them they have four times Our number of Students. The

misfortune for us is that our subjects are not so hopeful. We

are obliged to do at Cambridge [U. S.] that which is done at

Eton and Westminster, at Winchester, Rugby, and Harrow, as well

as at Oxford and Cambridge. Boys _may_ go to Eton at 6, and

do go often at 8, 10, and of Necessity before 12. They stay

there under excellent Masters, 6 Years, and then come to the

University. Whereas a smart clever boy with us, will learn out,

even at Mr. Gould’s, in 4 Years, and it was the boast of a very

distinguished Man Named Bird [Samuel Bird, H. C., 1809], who

was two Years before me at Cambridge, that he had fitted in

160 days. And I really think that I could, in six months teach

a mature lad, who was willing to work hard, all the Latin and

Greek requisite for admission.

This letter from Cogswell refers to George Bancroft, who was subsequently

sent out by Harvard College, after his graduation in 1817, that he might

be trained for the service of the institution.

GÖTTINGEN, May 4th, 1819.

It was truly generous and noble in the corporation to send out

young Bancroft in the manner I understand they did; he will

reward them for it. I thought very much of him, when I had

him under my charge at Cambridge, and now he appears to me

to promise a great deal more. I know not at whose suggestion

this was done, but from the wisdom of the measure, I should

conclude it must be the President’s; it is applying the remedy

exactly when it is most wanted, a taste once created for

classical learning at the College, and the means furnished for

cultivating it, and the long desired reform in education in my

opinion is virtually made; knowledge of every other kind may be

as well acquired among us, as the purposes to which it is to

be applied demand. We are not wanting in good lawyers or good

physicians, and if we could but form a body of men of taste and

letters, our literary reputation would not long remain at the

low stand which it now is.

It appears from a letter of my father’s, fourteen years later (November

21, 1833), that, after four years abroad, Mr. Bancroft’s college career

was a disappointment, and he was evidently regarded as a man spoiled by

vanity and self-consciousness, and not commanding a strong influence over

his pupils. My father wrote of these two teachers:—

CAMBRIDGE, MASS., 21 Nov., 1833.

Carlyle's laugh, and other surprises · 第 14 / 16 段