CHAPTER IV

THE HISTORY OF FAIRY TALES

The gods of ancient mythology were changed into the

demi-gods and heroes of ancient poetry, and these demi-gods

again became, at a later age, the principal characters of

our nursery tales.--MAX MÜLLER

Stories originally told about the characters of savage

tales, were finally attracted into the legends of the gods

of ancient mythology, or were attributed to demi-gods and

heroes.--ANDREW LANG.

I. THE ORIGIN OF FAIRY TALES

Now that we have indicated the worth of fairy tales, have observed

those principles which should guide the teacher in choosing and in

interpreting a tale, and have stated those rules which should govern

the story-teller in the telling of the tale, we may well ask a few

further questions concerning the nature of these fairy tales. What is

a fairy tale and whence did it come, and how are we to find its

beginning? Having found it, how are we to follow it down through the

ages? How shall it be classed, what are the available types which seek

to include it and show its nature? And lastly, what are the books

which are to be the main practical sources of fairy tales for the

teacher of little children? The remaining pages attempt to give some

help to the teacher who wishes to increase her resources with an

intelligent knowledge of the material she is handling.

Many times the question, "What is a fairy tale?" has been asked. One

has said: "The fairy tale is a poetic presentation of a spiritual

truth." George MacDonald has answered: "_Undine_ is a fairy tale." Mr.

G.K. Chesterton has said: "A fairy tale is a tale told in a morbid age

to the only remaining sane person, a child. A legend is a fairy tale

told to men when men were sane." Some, scorning to reply, have treated

the question as one similar to, "What poem do you consider best in the

English language?" As there are many tales included here which do not

contain a fairy, fairy tales here are taken to include tales which

contain something fairy or extraordinary, the magic or the

marvelous--fairies, elves, or trolls, speaking animals, trees, or a

talkative Tin Soldier. The Myth proper and the Fable are both excluded

here, while the _pourquois_ tale, a myth development, and the Beast

tale, a short-story fable development, are both included.

The origin of the word "fairy," as given by Thomas Keightley in his

_Fairy Mythology_, and later in the Appendix of his _Tales and Popular

Fictions_, is the Latin _fatum_, "to enchant." The word was derived

directly from the French form of the root. The various forms of the

root were:--

Latin _fatum_, "to enchant."

French _fee, feerie_, "illusion."

Italian _fata_.

Provençal _fada_.

In old French romance, _fee_ was a "woman skilled in magic." "All

those women were called Fays who had to do with enchantment and charms

and knew the power and virtue of words, of stones, and of herbs, by

which they were kept in youth and in great beauty and in great

riches." This was true also of the Italian _fata_.

The word "fairy" was used in four senses. _Fairy_ represented:--

(1) Illusion, or enchantment.

(2) Abode of the Faes, the country of the Fays.

(3) Inhabitants collectively, the people of Fairyland.

(4) The individual in Fairyland, the fairy Knight, or Elf.

The word was used in the fourth sense before the time of Chaucer.

After the appearance of Spenser's _Faerie Queene_ distinctions became

confused, and the name of the real fairies was transferred to "the

little beings who made the green, sour ringlets whereof the ewe not

bites." The change adopted by the poets gained currency among the

people. Fairies were identified with nymphs and elves. Shakespeare was

the principal means of effecting this revolution, and in his

_Midsummer Night's Dream_ he has incorporated most of the fairy lore

known in England at his time. But the tales are older than their name.

The origin of fairy tales is a question which has kept many very able

scholars busy and which has not yet been settled to the satisfaction

of many. What has been discovered resolves itself mainly into four

different origins of fairy tales:--

I. Fairy tales are detritus of myth, surviving echoes of gods and

heroes. Against this theory it may be said that, when popular tales

have incidents similar to Greek heroic myths, the tales are not

detritus of myth, but both have a more ancient tale as their original

source. There was:--

(1) A popular tale which reflected the condition of a rude

people, a tale full of the monstrous and the miraculous.

(2) The same tale, a series of incidents and plot, with the

monstrous element modified, which survived in the oral

traditions of illiterate peasantry.

(3) The same plot and incidents, as they existed in heroic

epics of cultivated people. A local and historical character

was given by the introduction of known places and native

heroes. Tone and manners were refined by literary

workmanship, in the _Rig Veda_, the Persian _King-book_, the

_Homeric Epics_, etc.

The Grimms noted that the evolution of the tale was from a strongly

marked, even ugly, but highly expressive form of its earlier stages,

to that which possessed external beauty of mold. The origin is in the

fancy of a primitive people, the survival is through _Märchen_ of

peasantry, and the transfiguration into epics is by literary artists.

Therefore, one and the same tale may be the source of Perrault's

_Sleeping Beauty_, also of a _Greek myth_, and also of an _old tale of

illiterate peasantry_. This was the opinion held by Lang, who said,

"For the roots of stories, we must look, not in the clouds but upon

the earth, not in the various aspects of nature but in the daily

occurrences and surroundings, in the current opinions and ideas of

savage life."

In the savage _Märchen_ of to-day, the ideas and incidents are the

inevitable result of the mental habits and beliefs of savages. We gain

an idea of the savage mind through Leviticus, in the Bible, through

Herodotus, Greek and Roman geographers, Aristotle, Plutarch, Pliny,

etc., through voyagers, missionaries, and travelers, and through

present savage peoples. Savage existence is based on two great

institutions:--

(a) The division of society into clans.--Marriage laws depend on the

conception that these clans descend from certain plants, animals, or

inorganic objects. There was the belief in human descent from animals

and kinship and personal intercourse with them.

(b) Belief in magic and medicine-men, which resulted in powers of

metamorphosis, the effect of incantation, and communion with the

dead.--To the savage all nature was animated, all things were persons.

The leading ideas of savage peoples have already been referred to in

the list of motifs which appear in the different fairy tales, as given

by Lang, mentioned under the "Preparation of the Teacher," in _The

Telling of the Tale_.

II. Fairy tales are myths of Sun, Dawn, Thunder, Rain, etc.

This is sometimes called the Sun-Myth Theory or the Aryan Theory, and

it is the one advocated by Max Müller and by Grimm.

The fairy tales were primitive man's experience with nature in days

when he could not distinguish between nature and his own personality,

when there was no supernatural because everything was endowed with a

personal life. They were the poetic fancies of light and dark, cloud

and rain, day and night; and underneath them were the same fanciful

meanings. These became changed by time, circumstances in different

countries, and the fancy of the tellers, so that they became sunny and

many-colored in the South, sterner and wilder in the North, and more

home-like in the Middle and West. To the Bushmen the wind was a bird,

and to the Egyptian fire was a living beast. Even _The Song of

Six-Pence_ has been explained as a nature-myth, the pie being the

earth and sky, the birds the twenty-four hours, the king the sun, the

queen the moon, and the opening of the pie, day-break.

Every word or phrase became a new story as soon as the first meaning

of the original name was lost. Andrew Lang tells how Kephalos the sun

loved Prokris the dew, and slew her by his arrows. Then when the first

meaning of the names for sun, dew, and rays was lost, Kephalos, a

shepherd, loved Prokris, a nymph, and we have a second tale which, by

a folk-etymology, became the _Story of Apollo, the Wolf_. Tales were

told of the sun under his frog name; later people forgot that _frog_

meant "sun," and the result was the popular tale, _A Frog, He Would

A-Wooing Go_.

In regard to this theory, "It is well to remember," says Tylor in his

_Primitive Culture_, "that rash inferences which, on the strength of

mere resemblances, derive episodes of myth from episodes of nature,

must be regarded with utter distrust; for the student who has no more

stringent criterion than this for his myths of sun and sky and dawn

will find them wherever it pleases him to seek them." There is a

danger of being carried away by false analogies. But all scholars

agree that some tales are evidently myths of sun and dawn. If we

examine the natural history of savages, we do find summer feasts,

winter feasts, rituals of sorrow for the going of summer and of

rejoicing for its return, anxious interest in the sun, interest in the

motion of the heavenly bodies, the custom of naming men and women from

the phenomena of nature, and interest in making love, making war,

making fun, and making dinner.

III. Fairy tales all arose in India, they are part of the common Aryan

heritage and are to be traced by the remains of their language.

They were first written in the _Vedas_, the sacred Sanskrit books of

Buddhism. This theory is somewhat allied to the Sun-Myth Theory. This

theory was followed by Max Müller and by Sir George Cox.

The theory of a common source in India will not answer entirely for

the origin of tales because many similar tales have existed in

non-Aryan countries. Old tales were current in Egypt, 2000 B.C., and

were brought from there by Crusaders, Mongol missionaries, the

Hebrews, and Gypsies.

The idea of connecting a number of disconnected stories, as we find in

_Arabian Nights_, _The Canterbury Tales_, and the _Decameron_, is

traced to the idea of making Buddha the central figure in the

folk-literature of India. And Jacobs says that at least one-third of

all the stories common to the children of Europe are derived from

India, and by far the majority of the drolls. He also says that

generally, so far as incidents are marvelous and of true fairy-like

character, India is the probable source, because of the vitality of

animism and transformation in India in all time. Moreover, as a

people, the Hindus had spread among their numbers enough literary

training and mental grip to invent plots.

And again, there is an accepted connection in myth and language

between all Aryan languages and Sanskrit. According to Sir George

Dasent, "The whole human race has sprung from one stock planted in the

East, which has stretched its boughs and branches laden with the fruit

of language and bright with the bloom of song and story, by successive

offshoots to the utmost parts of the earth." Dasent tells how the

Aryans who went west, who went out to _do_, were distinguished from

the nations of the world by their common sense, by their power of

adapting themselves to circumstances, by making the best of their

position, by being ready to receive impressions, and by being able to

develop impressions. They became the Greeks, the Latins, the Teutons,

the Celts, and the Slavonians. The Aryans who stayed at home, remained

to _reflect_, and were distinguished by their power of thought. They

became a nation of philosophers and gave to the world the Sanskrit

language as the basis of comparative philology. Dasent shows how

legends, such as the _Story of William Tell_ and _Dog Gellert_, which

have appeared in many Aryan peoples were common in germ to the Aryan

tribes before migration. Joseph Jacobs has more recently settled the

travels of _Gellert_, tracing its literary route from the Indian

_Vinaya Pitaka_, through the _Fables of Bidpai, Sindibad, Seven Sages

of Rome, Gesta Romanorum_, and the Welsh _Fables of Cottwg_, until the

legend became localized in Wales.

IV. Fairy tales owe their origin to the identity of early fancy.

Just as an individual, after thinking along certain lines, is

surprised to come upon the exact sequence of his thought in a book he

had never seen, so primitive peoples in remote parts of the world, up

against similar situations, would express experience in tales

containing similar motifs. A limited set of experiences was presented

to the inventive faculty, and the limited combinations possible would

result in similar combinations. The Aryan Jackal, the Mediaeval

Reynard, the Southern Brer Rabbit, and the Weasel of Africa, are near

relations. Dasent said, "In all mythology and tradition there are

natural resemblances, parallelisms, suggested to the senses of each

race by natural objects and everyday events; and these might spring up

spontaneously all over the earth as home-growths, neither derived by

imitation from other tribes, nor from the tradition of a common

stock."

It is probable that all four theories of the origin of fairy tales are

correct and that fairy tales owe their origin not to any one cause but

to all four.

II. THE TRANSMISSION OF FAIRY TALES

Oral transmission. The tale, having originated, may have been

transmitted in many ways: by women compelled to marry into alien

tribes; by slaves from Africa to America; by soldiers returning from

the Crusades; by pilgrims returning from the Holy Land or from Mecca;

by knights gathering at tournaments; by sailors and travelers; and by

commercial exchange between southern Europe and the East--Venice

trading with Egypt and Spain with Syria. Ancient tales of Persia

spread along the Mediterranean shores. In this way the Moors of Spain

learned many a tale which they transmitted to the French. _Jack the

Giant-Killer_ and _Thomas Thumb_, according to Sir Walter Scott,

landed in England from the very same keels and warships which conveyed

Hengist and Horsa and Ebba the Saxon. A recent report of the Bureau of

Ethnology of the Smithsonian Institution of the United States

expressed the opinion that the _Uncle Remus Tales_ have an Indian

origin. Slaves had associated with Indian tribes such as the

Cherokees, and had heard the story of the Rabbit who was so clever

that no one could fool him. Gradually the Southern negroes had adopted

the Indian tales and changed them. Joseph Jacobs claims to have found

the original of the "Tar Baby" in the _Jataka Tales_. A tale, once

having originated, could travel as easily as the wind. Certainly a

good type when once hit upon was diffused widely. Sir Walter Scott has

said: "A work of great interest might be compiled from the origin of

popular fiction and the transmission of similar tales from age to age

and from country to country. The mythology of one period would then

appear to pass into the romance of the next century, and that into the

nursery tales of subsequent ages. Such an investigation would show

that these fictions, however wild and childish, possess such charms

for the populace as to enable them to penetrate into countries

unconnected by manners and language, and having no apparent

intercourse to afford the means of transmission."

Thomas Keightley, in _Tales and Popular Fictions_, has given

interesting examples of the transmission of tales. Selecting _Jack the

Giant-Killer_, he has shown that it is the same tale as Grimm's _The

Brave Tailor_, and _Thor's Journey to Utgard_ in the Scandinavian

_Edda_. Similar motifs occur also in a Persian tale, _Ameen of Isfahan

and the Ghool_, and in the _Goat and the Lion_, a tale from the

_Panchatantra_. Selecting the _Story of Dick Whittington_ he has shown

that in England it was current in the reign of Elizabeth; that two

similar tales, Danish legends, were told by Thiele; that a similar

Italian tale existed at the time of Amerigo Vespucci, which was a

legend told by Arlotto in 1396-1483; that another similar Italian tale

was connected with the origin of Venice, in 1175; and that a similar

tale existed in Persia in 1300, before 1360, when Whittington of

England was born. He also pointed out that the _Odyssey_ must have

traveled east as well as west, from Greece, for Sindbad's adventure

with the Black Giant is similar to that of Ulysses with the Cyclops.

Another interesting set of parallels shown by him is connected with

the _Pentamerone_ tale, _Peruonto_. This is the Straparola _Peter the

Fool_, the Russian _Emelyan the Fool_, the Esthonian tale by

Laboulaye, _The Fairy Craw-Fish_, and the Grimm _The Fisherman and his

Wife_. The theme of a peasant being rewarded by the fish he had thrown

back into the water takes on a delightful varied form in the tale of

different countries. The magic words of Emelyan, "Up and away! At the

pike's command, and at my request, go home, sledge!" in each variant

take an interesting new form.

Literary transmission. The travels of a tale through oral tradition

are to be attempted with great difficulty and by only the most careful

scholarship. One may follow the transmission of tales through literary

collections with somewhat greater ease and exactness. Popular tales

have a literature of their own. The following list seeks to mention

the most noteworthy collections:--

No date. _Vedas_. Sanskrit.

No date. _Zend Avesta_. Persian.

Fifth century, B.C. _Jatakas_. Probably the oldest

literature. It was written at Ceylon and has been translated

into 38 languages, in 112 editions. Recently the Cambridge

edition has been translated from the Pali, edited by E.B.

Cowell, published by Putnam, New York, 1895-1907.

4000 B.C. _Tales of Ancient Egypt_. These were the tales of

magicians, recorded on papyrus.

600 B.C. (about). _Homeric Legends_.

200 B.C. (about). _Book of Esther_.

Second century, A.D. _The Golden Ass, Metamorphoses of Apuleius_.

550 A.D. _Panchatantra_, the _Five Books_. This was a

Sanskrit collection of fables, the probable source of the

_Fables of Bidpai_.

Second century, A.D. _The Hitopadesa_, or _Wholesome

Instruction_. A selection from the _Panchatantra_, first

edited by Carey, in 1804; by Max Müller, in 1844.

550 A.D. _Panchatantra_. Pehlevi version.

Tenth century, A.D. _Panchatantra_. Arabic version.

Eleventh century, A.D. _Panchatantra_. Greek version.

Twelfth century, A.D. _Panchatantra_. Persian version.

1200 A.D. _Sanskrit Tales_. These tales were collected by

Somadeva Bhatta, of Cashmere, and were published to amuse

the Queen of Cashmere. They have been translated by

Brockhaus, 1844. Somadeva's _Ocean of the Streams of Story_

has been translated by Mr. Tawney, of Calcutta, 1880.

Tales of the West came from the East in two sources:--

1262-78. (1) _Directorium Humanæ Vitæ_, of John of Capua.

This was translated from the _Hebrew_, from the _Arabic_ of

the eighth century, from the _Pehlevi_ of Persia of the

sixth century, from the _Panchatantra_, from the _Sanskrit

original_. This is the same as the famous Persian version,

_The Book of Calila and Dimna_, attributed to Bidpai, of

India. There was a late Persian version, in 1494, and one in

Paris in 1644, which was the source of La Fontaine.

Thirteenth century. (2) _The Story of the Seven Sages of

Rome_, or _The Book of Sindibad_. This appeared in Europe as

the Latin _History of the Seven Sages of Rome_, by Dame

Jehans, a monk in the Abbey of Haute Selve. There is a

Hebrew, an Arabic, and a Persian version. It is believed the

Persian version came from Sanskrit but the Sanskrit original

has not yet been found.

Tenth century. _Reynard the Fox_. This was first found as a

Latin product of the monks, in a cloister by the banks of

the Mosel and Mass. _Reynard the Fox_ shares with _Æsop's

Fables_ the distinction of being folk-lore raised into

literature. It is a series of short stories of adventure

forming a romance. These versions are known:--

1180. German-_Reinhart_, an epic of twelve

adventures by Heinrich Glichesäre.

1230. French-_Roman de Renard_, with its

twenty-seven branches.

1250. Flemish-_Reinaert_, part of which was

composed by Willem, near Ghent.

1148. _Ysengrimus_, a Latin poem written at Ghent.

Thirteenth century. _Of the Vox and of the Wolf_,

an English poem.

Later date. _Rainardo_, Italian.

Later date. Greek _mediaeval version_.

_Reynard the Fox_[5] was first printed in England

by Caxton in 1481, translated from a Dutch copy. A

copy of Caxton's book is in the British Museum.

Caxton's edition was adapted by "Felix Summerley";

and Felix Summerley's edition, with slight

changes, was used by Joseph Jacobs in his Cranford

edition.

A Dutch prose romance, _Historie von Reynaert de

Vos_ was published in 1485. A German copy, written

in Lower Saxony was published in 1498. A

chap-book, somewhat condensed, but giving a very

good account of the romance, was published in

London in 1780, printed and sold in Aldermary

Churchyard, Bow Lane. This chap-book is very much

finer in language than many of the others in

Ashton's collection. Its structure is good,

arranged in nine chapters. It shows itself a real

classic and would be read with pleasure to-day.

Goethe's poem, _Reineke Fuchs_, was published in

1794. This version was more refined than previous

ones but it lost in simplicity. Monographs have

been written on _Reynard_ by Grimm, Voigt, Martin,

and Sudre.

Raginhard was a man's name, meaning "strong in

counsel," and was common in Germany which bordered

on France. This name naturally was given to the

beast who lived by his wits. Grimm considered

_Reynard_ the result of a Teutonic Beast Epic of

primitive origin. Later research has exploded this

theory and has decided that all versions are

descended from an original French one existing

between 1150 and 1170. Modern editions have come

from the Flemish version. The literary artist who

compiled _Reynard_ took a nucleus of fables and

added to it folk-tales which are known to have

existed in the eleventh and twelfth centuries and

which exist to-day as tradition among some folk.

The folk-tales included in _Reynard_ are: _Reynard

and Dame Wolf_; _The Iced Wolf's Tail_; _The

Fishes in the Car_; _The Bear in the Cleft_; _The

Wolf as Bell-Ringer_; and _The Dyed Fox_. The

method of giving individual names to the animals

such as Reynard, Bruin, and Tibert, was current

among the Folk before a literary form was given to

_Reynard_. As this was the custom in the province

of Lorraine it is supposed that the origin of

these names was in Lorraine. Other names, such as

Chanticleer, the Cock, and Noble, the Lion, were

given because of a quality, and indicate a

tendency to allegory. These names increase in the

later development of the romance. In the beginning

when the beasts had only personal adventures,

these were told by the Folk to raise a laugh.

Later there was a meaning underneath the laugh and

the Beast Epic Comedy of the Folk grew into the

world Beast Satire of the literary artist.

_Reynard_ exhibits the bare struggle for existence

which was generally characteristic of Feudal life.

Cunning opposes force and triumphs over it. The

adventurous hero appeals because of his faculty of

_adjustment_, his power to adapt himself to

circumstances and to master them. He also appeals

because of his small size when compared with the

other animals. In the Middle Ages _Reynard_

appealed because it was a satire upon the monks.

Of _Reynard_ Carlyle has said, "It comes before us

with a character such as can belong only to very

few; that of being a true World's Book which

through centuries was everywhere at home, the

spirit of which diffused itself into all languages

and all minds."

* * * * *

About one tenth of European folk-lore is traced to

collections used in the Middle Ages: _Fables of Bidpai_,

_Seven Wise Masters_, _Gesta Romanorum_, and _Barlaam and

Josophat_. These tales became diffused through the _Exempla_

of the monks, used in their sermons, through the _Novelle_

of Italy, the _Decameron_ of Boccaccio, the _Tales of

Chaucer_, Painter's _Palace of Pleasure_, and the

_Elizabethan Drama_ of England. One half of La Fontaine's

_Fables_ are of Indian sources.

1326. The _Gesta Romanorum_, written in Latin. This was a

compilation, by the monks, of stories with a moral appended

to each. It was the most popular story-book before the

invention of printing. In England it was printed by Wynkyn

de Worde, of which edition the only known copy is at St.

John's College, Cambridge. The earliest manuscript of the

collection is dated 1326. Between 1600 and 1703 fifteen

editions of the book prove its popularity. One English

version is by Sir Frederick Madden, who lived 1801-73. The

author of the _Gesta Romanorum_ is unknown, but was likely a

German. The stories included are miscellaneous and vary in

different editions. Among its stories are Oriental tales,

tales of the deeds of Roman Emperors, an early form of _Guy

of Warwick_, the casket episode of _The Merchant of Venice_,

a story of the Jew's bond, a tale of the Emperor Theodosius,

being a version of _King Lear_, the story of the Hermit, and

a tale of Aglas, the daughter of the Roman Emperor Pompey,

being a version of _Atalanta and her Race_.

1000 A.D. (about). _Shah-Nameh_, or _King-book of Persia_,

by Ferdousee, born about 940 A.D. This book is the pride and

glory of Persian literature. It was written by the Persian

poet at the command of the king, who wished to have

preserved the old traditions and heroic glories of Persians

before the Arabian conquest. Ferdousee declared that he

invented none of his material, but took it from the

_Bostan-Nameh_ or _Old-Book_.

The _King-Book_ is very ancient, it is the Persian Homer. It

was the labor of thirty years. It consisted of 56,000

distichs or couplets, for every thousand of which the Sultan

had promised the poet one thousand pieces of gold. Instead

of the elephant-load of gold promised, the Sultan sent in

payment 60,000 small silver coins. This so enraged the poet

that he gave away one third to the man who brought them, one

third to a seller of refreshments, and one third to the

keeper of the bath where the messenger found him. After the

poet's death the insult was retrieved by proper payment.

This was refused by his one daughter, but accepted by the

other and used to erect a public dike the poet had always

desired to build to protect his native town from the river.

The fine character of the tales of the _King-Book_ is shown

in the tale of _Roostem and Soohrab_, taken from this book,

which Keightley has translated in _Tales and Popular

Fictions_. Keightley considered it superior to any Greek or

Latin tale. Modern literature knows this tale through

Matthew Arnold's poem.

1548 (not later than). _The Thousand and One Nights_,

Arabian. 12 volumes. Galland's French translation appeared

in 1704. This was supplemented by Chavis and Cazotte, and by

Caussin de Percival. Monsieur Galland was Professor of

Arabic in the Royal College of Paris. He was a master of

French and a fairly good scholar of Arabic. He brought his

manuscript, dated 1548, to Paris from Constantinople. He

severely abbreviated the original, cutting out poetical

extracts and improving the somewhat slovenly style. In his

translation he gave to English the new words, _genie, ogre_,

and _vizier_. His work was very popular.

Boulak and Calcutta texts are better than the Galland. They

contain about two hundred and fifty stories. The Cairo

edition has been admirably translated by Edward W. Lane, in

3 volumes (1839-41) published in London. This is probably

the best edition. It also omits many poetical quotations. A

recent edition using Lane's translation is by Frances

Olcott, published by Holt in 1913. Editions which attempt to

be complete versions are by John Payne (13 volumes,

1882-84), and by Sir Richard Burton (16 volumes, 1885-88).

Lane and Burton give copious notes of value. The recent

edition by Wiggin and Smith used the editions of Scott and

Lane.

The stories in _Arabian Nights_ are Indian, Egyptian,

Arabian, and Persian. Scenes are laid principally in Bagdad

and Cairo. Lane considered that the one hundred and fifteen

stories, which are common to all manuscripts, are based on

the Pehlevi original. The idea of the frame of the story

came from India. This was the birth of the serial story.

There is authority for considering the final collection to

have been made in Egypt. Cairo is described most minutely

and the customs are of Egypt of the thirteenth century and

later. The stories must have been popular in Egypt as they

were mentioned by an historian, 1400-70. Lane considered

that the final Arabic collection bears to Persian tales the

same relation that the _Æneid_ does to the _Odyssey_. Life

depicted is Arabic, and there is an absence of the great

Persian heroes. Internal evidence assists in dating the

work. Coffee is mentioned only three times. As its use

became popular in the East in the fourteenth century this

indicates the date of the work to be earlier than the very

common use of coffee. Cannon, which are mentioned, were

known in Egypt in 1383. Additions to the original were

probably made as late as the sixteenth century. _The Arabian

Nights_ has been the model for many literary attempts to

produce the Oriental tale, of which the tales of George

Meredith are notable examples.

Thomas Keightley, in _Tales and Popular Fictions_,

considered Persia the original country of _The Thousand and

One Nights_, and _The Voyages of Sinbad_, originally a

separate work. He showed how some of these tales bear marks

of Persian extraction and how some had made their way to

Europe through oral transmission before the time of

Galland's translation. He selected the tale, "Cleomedes and

Claremond," and proved that it must have been learned by a

certain Princess Blanche, of Castile, and transmitted by her

to France about 1275. This romance must have traveled to

Spain from the East. It is the same as "The Enchanted Horse"

in _The Thousand and One Nights_, and through Keightley's

proof, is originally Persian. Keightley also selected the

Straparola tale, _The Dancing Water, the Singing Apple, and

the Beautiful Green Bird_, and proved it to be the same as

Grimm's _Three Little Birds_, as a Persian _Arabian Night's_

tale, and also as _La Princesse Belle Etoile_, of D'Aulnoy.

But as Galland's translation appeared only the year after

Madame D'Aulnoy's death, Madame D'Aulnoy must have obtained

the tale elsewhere than from the first printed version of

_Arabian Nights_.

No date. _The Thousand and One Days_. This is a Persian

collection containing the "History of Calaf."

1550. _Straparola's Nights_, by Straparola. This collection

of jests, riddles, and twenty-one stories was published in

Venice. The stories were taken from oral tradition, from the

lips of ten young women. Some were agreeable, some unfit, so

that the book was forbidden in Rome, in 1605, and an

abridged edition prepared. There was a complete Venetian

edition in 1573, a German translation in 1679, a French one

in 1611, and a good German one with valuable notes, by

Schmidt, in 1817. Straparola's _Nights_ contained stories

similar to the German _The Master Thief, The Little Peasant,

Hans and the Hedge-Hog, Iron Hans, The Four Brothers, The

Two Brothers_, and _Dr. Know-all_.

1637. _The Pentamerone_, by Basile. Basile spent his early

youth in Candia or Crete, which was owned by Venice. He

traveled much in Italy, following his sister, who was a

noted singer, to Mantua. He probably died in 1637. There may

have been an earlier edition of _The Pentamerone_, which

sold out. It was republished in Naples in 1645, 1674, 1714,

1722, 1728, 1749, 1788, and in Rome in 1679. This was the

best collection of tales formed by a nation for a long time.

The traditions were complete, and the author had a special

talent for collecting them, and an intimate knowledge of

dialect. This collection of fifty stories may be looked upon

as the basis of many others. Basile wrote independently of

Straparola, though a few tales are common to both. He was

very careful not to alter the tale as he took it down from

the people. He told his stories with allusions to manners

and customs, to old stories and mythology. He abounds in

picturesque, proverbial expressions, with turns and many

similes, and displays a delightful exuberance of fancy. A

valuable translation, with notes, was written by Felix

Liebrecht, in 1842, and an English one by John Edward

Taylor, in 1848. Keightley, in _Fairy Mythology_, has

translated three of these tales and in _Tales and Popular

Fictions_, two tales. Keightley's were the first

translations of these tales into any language other than

Italian. Among the stories of Basile are the German

_Cinderella, How Six got on in the World, Rapunzel, Snow

White, Dame Holle, Briar Rose_, and _Hansel and Grethel_.

1697. _The Tales of Mother Goose_, by Charles Perrault. In

France the collecting of fairy tales began in the

seventeenth century. French, German, and Italian tales were

all derived independently by oral tradition. In 1696, in

_Recueil_, a magazine published by Moetjens, at The Hague,

appeared _The Story of Sleeping Beauty_, by Perrault. In

1697 appeared seven other tales by Perrault. Eight stories

were published in 12mo, under a title borrowed from a

_fabliau_, _Contes de ma Mere l'Oye_. In a later edition

three stories were added, _The Ass's Skin_, _The Clever

Princess_, and _The Foolish Wishes_. The tales of Perrault

were:--

1. The Fairies.

2. The Sleeping Beauty in the Wood.

3. Bluebeard.

4. Little Red Riding Hood.

5. Puss-in-Boots.

6. Cinderella.

7. Rique with the Tuft.

8. Little Thumb.

9. The Ass's Skin.

10. The Clever Princess.

11. The Foolish Wishes.

Immediately afterwards the tales appeared published at Paris

in a volume entitled, _Histoires ou Contes du Temps Passe,

avec des Moralites--Contes de ma Mère l'Oye_. The earliest

translation into English was in a book containing French and

English, _Tales of Passed Times, by Mother Goose, with

Morals. Written in French by M. Charles Perrault and

Englished by R.S., Gent_. An English translation by Mr.

Samber was advertised in the English _Monthly Chronicle_,

March, 1729. Andrew Lang, with an introduction, has edited

these tales from the original edition, published by the

Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1888. These tales made their way

slowly in England, but gradually eclipsed the native English

tales and legends which had been discouraged by Puritan

influence. In Perrault's time, when this influence was

beginning to decline, they superseded the English tales,

crowding out all but _Jack the Giant-Killer, Tom

Hickathrift, Jack and the Beanstalk, Tom Thumb_, and _Childe

Rowland_.

1650-1705. _Fairy Tales_, by Madame D'Aulnoy. In France

there were many followers of Perrault. The most important of

these was Madame D'Aulnoy. She did not copy Perrault. She

was a brilliant, witty countess, and brought into her tales,

entitled _Contes de Fées_, the graces of the court. She

adhered less strictly to tradition than Perrault, and

handled her material freely, making additions,

amplifications, and moral reflections, to the original tale.

Her weaving together of incidents is artistic and her style

graceful and not unpleasing. It is marked by ornamentation,

sumptuousness, and French sentimentality. It shows a lack of

naïveté resulting from the palace setting given to her

tales, making them adapted only to children of high rank.

Often her tale is founded on a beautiful tradition. _The

Blue-Bird_, one of the finest of her tales, was found in the

poems of Marie de France, in the thirteenth century. Three

of her tales were borrowed from Straparola. Among her tales

the most important are:--

_Graciosa and Percinet_. (Basile.)

_The Blue-Bird_. (Contains a motif similar to one

in _The Singing, Soaring Lark_.)

_The White Cat_. (Similar to _Three Feathers_ and

_The Miller's Boy and the Cat_.)

_The Hind in the Wood_. (Similar to _Rumpelstiltskin_.)

_The Good Little Mouse_. (Basile.)

_The Fair One with the Golden Locks. (Ferdinand

the Faithful.)_

_The Yellow Dwarf_.

_Princess Belle Etoile_. (Straparola.)

The careful translation of Madame D'Aulnoy's tales by Mr.

Planché faithfully preserves the spirit of the original.

There were many imitators of Countess D'Aulnoy, in France,

in the eighteenth century. Their work was on a much lower

level and became published in the _Cabinet des Fées_, a

collection of stories including in its forty volumes the

work of many authors, of which the greater part is of little

value. Of those following D'Aulnoy three deserve mention:--

1711-1780. _Moral Tales_, by Madame de Beaumont.

These were collected while the author was in

England. Of these we use _Prince Cherry_. Madame

de Beaumont wrote a children's book in which is

found a tale similar to _The Singing, Soaring

Lark_, entitled _The Maiden and the Beast_. She

also wrote 69 volumes of romance.

1765. _Tales_, by Madame Villeneuve. Of these we

use _Beauty and the Beast_.

1692-1765. _Tales_, by Comte de Caylus. The author

was an antiquarian and scholar. Of his tales we

use _Sylvain and Yocosa_.

Very little attempt has been made in modern times to include

in our children's literature the best of foreign literature

for children, for there has been very little study of

foreign books for children. Certainly the field of

children's literature would be enriched to receive

translations of any books worthy of the name classic. A

partial list of French fairy tales is here given, indicating

to children's librarians how little has been done to open up

this field, and inviting their labor:--

_Bibliothèque Rose_, a collection. (What should be

included?)

_Bibliothèque des Petits Enfants_, a collection.

(What should be included?)

1799-1874. _Fairy Tales from the French_, by

Madame de Ségur. These tales are published by

Winston. We also use her _Story of a Donkey_,

written in 1860 and published by Heath in 1901.

1866. _Fairy Tales of all Nations_, by Edouard

Laboulaye.

1902. _Last Fairy Tales_, also by Laboulaye.

_Tales_, by Zenaide Fleuriot. (What should be

included?)

1910. _Chantecler_, by Edmund Rostand. Translated

by Gertrude Hall, published by Duffield.

1911. _The Honey Bee_, by Anatole France;

translated by Mrs. Lane; published by Lane.

1911. _The Blue-Bird_, by Maurice Maeterlinck;

published by Dodd.

In Great Britain many old tales taken from tradition were included in

the Welsh Mabinogion, Irish sagas, and Cornish Mabinogion. Legends of

Brittany were made known by the poems of Marie de France, who lived in

the thirteenth century. These were published in Paris, in 1820. In

fact, most of the early publications of fairy tales were taken from

the French.

Celtic tales have been collected in modern times in a greater number

than those of any nation. This has been due largely to the work of

J.F. Campbell. Celtic tales are unusual in that they have been

collected while the custom of story-telling is yet flourishing among

the Folk. They are therefore of great literary and imaginative

interest. They are especially valuable as the oldest of the European

tales. The Irish tale of _Connla and the Fairy Maiden_ has been traced

to a date earlier than the fifth century and therefore ranks as the

oldest tale of modern Europe. The principal Celtic collections are:--

_Iolo M. S_., published by the Welsh M. S. Society.

_Mabinogion_, translated by Lady Guest. (Contains tales

that trace back to the twelfth century.)

_Y Cymrodor_, by Professor Rhys.

1825. _Fairy Legends and Traditions of the South of

Ireland_, by T. Crofton Croker.

1842. _Popular Rhymes of Scotland_. Chambers.

1860-62. _Popular Tales of the West Highlands_, by J.F.

Campbell.

_Tales_, collected and published with notes, by Mr. Alfred

Nutt.

1866. By Patrick Kennedy, the Irish Grimm. _Legendary

Fictions of the Irish Celts; Fireside Stories of Ireland_

(1870); and _Bardic Stories of Ireland_ (1871).

In England the publication of fairy tales may be followed more readily

because the language proves no hindrance and the literature gives

assistance. In England the principal publications of fairy tales

were:--

1604. _Pasquil's Jests_. Contained a tale similar to one of

Grimm's.

1635. _A Tract, A Descryption of the Kynge and Quene of

Fairies, their habit, fare, abode, pomp, and state_.

Eighteenth century (early). _Madame D'Aulnoy's Tales_, a

translation.

1667-1745. _Gulliver's Travels_, by Dean Swift. (One modern

edition, with introduction by W.D. Howells, and more than

one hundred illustrations by Louis Rhead, is published by

Harpers. Another edition, illustrated by Arthur Rackham, is

published by Dutton.)

1700-1800. _Chap-Books_. Very many of these books,

especially the best ones, were published by William and

Cluer Dicey, in Aldermary Church Yard, Bow Lane, London.

Rival publishers, whose editions were rougher in engraving,

type, and paper, labored in Newcastle.

The chap-books were little paper books hawked by chap-men,

or traveling peddlers, who went from village to village with

"Almanacks, Bookes of Newes, or other trifling wares." These

little books were usually from sixteen to twenty-four pages

in bulk and in size from two and one half inches by three

and one half inches to five and one half inches by four and

one quarter inches. They sold for a penny or six-pence and

became the very popular literature of the middle and lower

classes of their time. After the nineteenth century they

became widely published, deteriorated, and gradually were

crowded out by the _Penny Magazine_ and _Chambers's Penny

Tracts and Miscellanies_. For many years before the

Victorian period, folk-lore was left to the peasants and

kept out of reach of the children of the higher classes.

This was the reign of the moral tale, of Thomas Bewick's

_Looking Glass of the Mind_ and Mrs. Sherwood's _Henry and

His Bearer_. Among the chap-books published by William and

Cluer Dicey, may be mentioned: _The Pleasant and Delightful

History of Jack and the Giants_ (part second was printed and

sold by J. White); _Guy, Earl of Warwick; Bevis of Hampton;

The History of Reynard the Fox_, dated 1780; _The History of

Fortunatus_, condensed from an edition of 1682; _The Fryer

and the Boy; A True Tale of Robin Hood_ (Robin Hood Garland

Blocks, from 1680, were used in the London Bridge Chap-Book

edition); _The Famous History of Thomas Thumb; The History

of Sir Richard Whittington_; and _The Life and Death of St.

George. Tom Hickathrift_ was printed by and for M. Angus and

Son, at Newcastle-in-the-Side: _Valentine and Orson_ was

printed at Lyons, France, in 1489; and in England by Wynkyn

de Worde. Among the chap-books many tales not fairy tales

were included. With the popularity of _Goody Two Shoes_ and

the fifty little books issued by Newbery, the realistic tale

of modern times made a sturdy beginning. Of these realistic

chap-books one of the most popular was _The History of

Little Tom Trip_, probably by Goldsmith, engraved by the

famous Thomas Bewick, published by T. Saint, of Newcastle.

This was reprinted by Ed. Pearson in 1867.

Of _Jack the Giant-Killer_, in Skinner's _Folk-Lore_, David

Masson has said: "Our _Jack the Giant-Killer_ is clearly the

last modern transmutation of the old British legend, told in

Geoffrey of Monmouth, of Corineüs the Trojan, the companion

of the Trojan Brutus when he first settled in Britain; which

Corineüs, being a very strong man, and particularly

good-humored, is satisfied with being King of Cornwall, and

killing out all the aboriginal giants there, leaving to

Brutus all the rest of the island, and only stipulating

that, whenever there is a peculiarly difficult giant in any

part of Brutus' dominions, he shall be sent for to finish

the fellow."

_Tom Hickathrift_, whose history is given in an old number

of _Fraser's Magazine_, is described by Thackeray as one of

the publisher Cundall's books, bound in blue and gold,

illustrated by Frederick Taylor in 1847. According to

Thackeray this chap-book tale was written by Fielding.

Speaking of the passage, "The giant roared hideously but Tom

had no more mercy on him than a bear upon a dog," he said:

"No one but Fielding could have described battle so." Of the

passage, "Having increased his strength by good living and

improved his courage by drinking strong ale," he remarked:

"No one but Fielding could have given such an expression."

The quality of the English of this chap-book is apparent in

the following sentence, taken from Ashton's version: "So Tom

stepped to a gate and took a rail for a staff."

In regard to their literary merit the chap-books vary

greatly. Some evidently are works of scholars who omitted to

sign their names. In the collection by Ashton those

deserving mention for their literary merit are: _Patient

Grissel_, by Boccaccio; _Fortunatus_; _Valentine and Orson_;

_Joseph and His Brethren_; _The Friar and the Boy_; _Reynard

the Fox_, from Caxton's translation; _Tom Hickathrift_,

probably by Fielding; and _The Foreign Travels of Sir John

Mandeville_.

1708-90. Chap-Books. Printed by J. White, of York,

established at Newcastle, 1708. These included: _Tom

Hickathrift; Jack the Giant-Killer_; and _Cock Robin_.

1750. _A New Collection of Fairy Tales_. 2 vols.

1760. _Mother Goose's Melodies_. A collection of many

nursery rhymes, songs, and a few old ballads and tales,

published by John Newbery. The editor is unknown, but most

likely was Oliver Goldsmith. The title of the collection may

have been borrowed from Perrault's _Contes de ma Mère

l'Oye_, of which an English version appeared in 1729. The

title itself has an interesting history dating hundreds of

years before Perrault's time. By 1777 _Mother Goose's

Melodies_ had passed the seventh edition. In 1780 they were

published by Carnan, Newbery's stepson, under the title

_Sonnets for the Cradle_. In 1810 _Gammer Gurton's Garland_,

a collection, was edited by Joseph Ritson, an English

scholar. In 1842 J.O. Halliwell issued, for the Percy

Society, _The Nursery Rhymes of England_. The standard

modern text should consist of Newbery's book with such

additions from Ritson and Halliwell as bear internal

evidence of antiquity and are true nursery rhymes.

1770. _Queen Mab, A Collection of Entertaining Tales of

Fairies_.

1783. _The Lilliputian Magazine_. Illustrated by Thomas

Bewick, published by Carnan.

1788. _The Pleasing Companion, A Collection of Fairy Tales_.

1788. _Fairy Tales Selected from the Best Authors_, 2 vols.

1770-91. Books published by John Evans, of Long Lane.

Printed on coarse sugar paper. They included: _Cock Robin_,

1791; _Mother Hubbard; Cinderella_; and _The Tragical Death

of an Apple Pye_.

1809. _A Collection of Popular Stories for the Nursery_,

translated from French, Italian, and Old English, by

Benjamin Tabart, in 4 volumes.

1810 (about). _Lilliputian Library_, by J.G. Rusher, of

Bridge St., Banbury. The Halfpenny Series included:

_Mother Hubbard and Her Dog; Jack The

Giant-Killer; Dick Whittington and His Cat; The

History of Tom Thumb_ (Middlesex); _Death and

Burial of Cock Robin; and Cinderella and Her Glass

Slipper_.

The Penny Series included:--

_History of a Banbury Cake, and Jack the

Giant-Killer_, designed by Craig, engraved by Lee.

Of Rusher's books those engraved by the Bewick School were:

_Cock Robin; The History of Tom Thumb_; and

_Children in the Wood_.

Rusher's books also included:

_Mother Hubbard and Her Dog, Cinderella and Her

Glass Slipper_, and _Dick Whittington and His

Cat_, all designed by Cruikshank, engraved by

Branstone.

1818. _Fairy Tales, or the Lilliputian Cabinet_, collected

by Benj. Tabart, London. This was a new edition of the

collection of 1809, and contained twenty-four stories. A

full review of it may be seen in the _Quarterly Review_,

1819, No. 41, pp. 91-112. The tales included translations

from Perrault, Madame D'Aulnoy, Madame de Beaumont, tales

from _The Thousand and One Nights_, and from _Robin Hood_;

and the single tales of _Jack the Giant-Killer, Tom Thumb_,

and _Jack and the Bean-Stalk_.

1824, 1826. _German Popular Stories_, translated by Edgar

Taylor, with illustrations by Cruikshank, published by

Charles Tilt, London. A new edition, introduction by Ruskin,

was published by Chatto & Windus, 1880.

The above are the main collections of fairy tales in England. Many

individual publications show the gradual development of fairy tale

illustration in England:[6]--

1713-1767. John Newbery's _Books for Children_. Among these

were _Beauty and the Beast_, by Charles Lamb, 1765, and

_Sinbad the Sailor_, 1798.

1778. _Fabulous Histories of the Robins_. Mrs. Sarah

Trimmer. Cuts designed by Thomas Bewick, engraved by John

Thompson, Whittingham's Chiswick Press.

1755-1886. _Life and Perambulations of a Mouse_; and

_Adventures of a Pin-Cushion_. Dorothy Kilner.

1785. Baron Munchausen's _Narratives of His Famous Travels

and Campaigns in Russia_. Rudolf Raspe.

1788. _Little Thumb and the Ogre_. Illustrated by William

Blake; published by Dutton.

1790. _The Death and Burial of Cock Robin_. Illustrated by Thomas

Bewick. Catnach.

1807. _Tales from Shakespeare_. Charles and Mary Lamb. W.J.

Godwin and Co. William Blake illustrated an edition of these

tales, probably the original edition.

1813. Reprints of forgotten books, by Andrew Tuer: _Dame

Wiggins of Lee; The Gaping Wide-Mouthed Waddling Frog: The

House that Jack Built. Dame Wiggins of Lee_ was first

printed by A.K. Newman and Co., Minerva Press. Original cuts

by Stennet or Sinnet. Reprinted by Allen, 1885, with

illustrations added by Kate Greenaway.

1841. _King of the Golden River_. John Ruskin. Illustrated

by Richard Doyle, 1884.

1844. _Home Treasury_, by "Felix Summerley" (Sir Henry

Cole). "Felix Summerley" was a reformer in children's books.

He secured the assistance of many of the first artists of

his time: Mulready, Cope, Horsley, Redgrave, Webster, all of

the Royal Academy, Linnell and his three sons, Townsend, and

others. These little books were published by Joseph Cundall

and have become celebrated through Thackeray's mention of

them. They aimed to cultivate the affections, fancy,

imagination, and taste of children, they were a distinct

contrast to the Peter Parley books.

They were new books, new combinations of old materials, and

reprints, purified but not weakened. Their literature

possessed brightness. The books were printed in the best

style of the Chiswick Press, with bindings and end papers

especially designed. They included these tales: _Puck's

Reports to Oberon; Four New Fairy Tales; The Sisters; Golden

Locks; Grumble and Cherry; Little Red Riding Hood_, with

four colored illustrations by Webster; _Beauty and the

Beast_, with four colored illustrations by Horsley; _Jack

and the Bean-Stalk_, with four colored illustrations by

Cope; _Jack the Giant-Killer_, also illustrated by Cope; and

_The Pleasant History of Reynard, the Fox_, with forty of

the fifty-seven etchings made by Everdingen, in 1752.

1824-1883. Publications by Richard Doyle. These included

_The Fairy Ring_, 1845; _Snow White and Rosy Red_, 1871;

_Jack the Giant-Killer_, 1888, etc.

1846. _Undine_, by De La Motté Fouque, illustrated by John

Tenniel, published by James Burns.

1846. _The Good-Natured Bear_, by Richard Hengist Home, the

English critic. This was illustrated by Frederick Taylor,

published probably by Cundall. The book is now out of print,

but deserves to be reprinted.

1847-1864. _Cruikshank Fairy Library_. A series of small

books in paper wrappers. Not equal to the German popular

stories in illustration. It included _Tom Thumb_, 1830;

_John Gilpin_, 1828 (realistic); and _The Brownies_, 1870.

1847. _Bob and Dog Quiz_. Author unknown. Revived by E.V.

Lucas in _Old-fashioned Tales_. Illustrated by F.D. Bedford;

published by Stokes, 1905.

1850. _The Child's Own Book_. Published in London. There was

an earlier edition, not before 1830. The introduction, which

in the 1850 edition was copied from the original, indicates

by its style that the book was written early in the

nineteenth century. The book was the delight of generations

of children. It was a collection containing tales from

_Arabian Nights_, Perrault's tales of _Cinderella,

Puss-in-Boots, Hop-o'-my-Thumb, Bluebeard_, etc., D'Aulnoy's

_Valentine and Orson_, chap-book stories of _Dick

Whittinqton, Fortunatus, Griselda, Robinson Crusoe, The

Children in the Wood, Little Jack_, and others. A recent

edition of this book is in the _Young Folks' library_, vol.

1, published by Hall & Locke, Boston, 1901.

1850 (about). _The Three Bears_. Illustrated by Absalon and

Harrison Weir. Addy and Co.

1824-1889. Work by Mrs. Mary Whateley. She had a Moslem

school in Cairo and exerted a fairy tale influence.

1826-1887. _The Little Lame Prince; Adventures of a_

_Brownie_; and _The Fairy Book_. Produced by Mrs. Dinah

Muloch Craik.

1854. _The Rose and the Ring_, by William M. Thackeray. A

modern edition contains the original illustrations with

additions by Monsell. Crowell.

1855. _Granny's Story Box_. A collection. Illustrated by J.

Knight; published by Piper, Stephenson, and Spence.

1856. _Granny's Wonderful Chair_, containing _Prince

Fairy-foot_. Written by Frances Browne, a blind Irish

poetess.

1863. _Water Babies_. Charles Kingsley. Sir Noel Patton. The

Macmillan Company.

1865. _Stories Told to a Child, including Fairy Tales; Mopsa

the Fairy_, 1869. By Jean Ingelow.

1865. _Alice's Adventures in Wonderland_, by Lewis Carroll

(Charles Dodgson), with 42 illustrations by John Tenniel,

published by Macmillan Company, Oxford. First edition

recalled. Later editions were published by Richard Clay,

London.

1869. _At the Back of the North Wind_; _The Princess and the

Goblin_, 1871. By George MacDonald. Arthur Hughes. Strahan.

Reprinted by Blackie.

1870. _The Brownies_; 1882, _Old-fashioned Fairy Tales_. By

Juliana Ewing.

1873. _A Series of Toy-Books for Children_, by Walter Crane

(1845-1914). Published by Routledge and printed in colors by

Edmund Evans. Twenty-seven of these stories in nine volumes

are published by John Lane, Bodley Head. _Princess

Fioromonde_, 1880, _Grimm's Household Stories_, 1882, and

_The Cuckoo Clock_, 1887, all by Mrs. Molesworth, were also

illustrated by Crane.

1878-. _Picture-Books_, by Randolph Caldecott (1846-1886).

These were sixteen in number. They are published by F.

Warne.

1875-. _Stories from the Eddas; Dame Wiggins of Lee

(Allen)_; and _The Pied Piper of Hamelin_. These delightful

books by Kate Greenaway (1846-1901) were published by

Routledge and engraved by Edmund Evans. They are now

published by F. Warne.

This brings the English side of the subject down to

the present time. Present editions of fairy tales are

given in Chapter VI.

In Germany there were also many translations from the French of

Perrault and D'Aulnoy. There were editions in 1764, 1770, etc. Most of

those before the _Grimms' Tales_ were not important. One might

mention:--

1782. _Popular German Stories_, by Musäus.

1818. _Fables, Stories, and Tales for Children_, by Caroline

Stahl.

1819. _Bohemian Folk-Tales_, by Wolfgang Gerle.

1812-1814. _Kinder und Haus-Märchen_, by Jacob and William

Grimm. The second edition was published in 3 volumes in

Berlin, by Reiner, in 1822. This latter work formed an era

in popular literature and has been adopted as a model by all

true collectors since.

Concerning the modern German fairy tale, the Germans have paid such

special attention to the selection and grading of children's

literature that their library lists are to be recommended. Wolgast,

the author of _Vom Kinderbuch_, is an authority on the child's book.

The fairy tale received a high estimate in Germany and no nation has

attained a higher achievement in the art of the fairy tale book. The

partial list simply indicates the slight knowledge of available

material and would suggest an inviting field to librarians. A great

stimulus to children's literature would be given by a knowledge of

what the Germans have already accomplished in this particular. In

Germany a child's book, before it enters the market, must first be

accepted by a committee who test the book according to a standard of

excellence. Any book not coming up to the standard is rejected. A few

of the German editions in use are given:--

_Bilderbücher_, by Löwensohn.

_Bilderbücher_, by Scholz.

_Liebe Märchen_. One form of the above, giving three tales

in one volume.

_Märchen_, by W. Hauff, published by Lowe. One edition,

illustrated by Arthur Rackham, is published by Dutton. _The

Caravan Tales_ is an edition published by Stokes.

_Märchen_, by Musaus, published by Von K.A. Müller.

1777-1843. _Undine_, by La Motte Fouqué. A recent edition,

illustrated by Rackham, is published by Doubleday.

1817-77. _Books_ by Otillie Wildermuth. (What of hers should

be translated and included?)

_Hanschen im Blaubeerenwald; Hanschens Skifart Märchen_,

both by Elsa Beskow, published by Carl.

_Windchen_; and _Wurzelkindern_, both by Sybille von Olfers,

published by Schreiber.

_Das Märchen von den Sandmannlein_, by Riemann, published by

Schreiber.

_Der Froschkönig_, by Liebermann, published by Scholz.

_Weisst du weviel Sternlein stehen_, by Lewinski, published

by Schreiber.

In Sweden there appeared translations of Perrault and D'Aulnoy. _The

Blue-Bird_ was oftenest printed as a chap-book. Folk-tales were

collected in:--

_Swedish Tales_, a collection. H. Von Schroter.

1844. _Folk-Tales_. George Stevens and Hylten Cavallius.

Sweden has given us the modern fairy tale, _The Wonderful Adventures

of Nils_ (2 volumes). This delightful tale by Selma Lagerlöf, born

1858, and a winner of the Nobel prize, has established itself as a

child's classic. It has been translated by V.S. Howard, published by

Doubleday, 1907.

In Norway we have:--

1851. _Norske Folkeeventyr_, collected by Asbjörnsen and Moe.

1862. _Norse Tales_. The above tales translated by Sir

George W. Dasent.

In Denmark we have:--

_Sagas of Bodvar Biarke_.

_Danske Folkeeventyr_, by M. Winther, Copenhagen, 1823.

1843-60. _Danmarks Folkesagn_, 3 vols., by J.M. Thiele.

1805-1875. _Fairy Tales_, by Hans Christian Andersen. These

tales are important as marking the beginning of the modern

fairy tale. They are important also as literary fairy tales

and have not been equaled in modern times.

In Slavonia we have:--

_Wochentliche Nachrichten_, by Busching, published by Schottky.

In Hungary we have:--

1822. _Marchen der Magyaren_, by George von Gaal.

In Greece and Russia no popular tales were collected before the time

of the Grimms.

In Italy the two great collections of the world of fairy tales have

been mentioned. Italy has also given the modern fairy tale which has

been accepted as a classic: _Pinocchio_, by C. Collodi (Carlo

Lorenzini). This has been illustrated by Copeland, published by Ginn;

and illustrated by Folkhard, published by Dutton.

In America the publication of fairy tales was at first a reprinting of

English editions. In colonial times, previous to the revolution,

booksellers imported largely from England. After the revolution a new

home-growth in literature gradually developed. At first this was

largely in imitation of literature in England. After the time of

Washington Irving a distinct American adult literature established

itself. The little child's toy-book followed in the wake of the

grown-up's fiction. The following list[7] shows the growth of the

American fairy tale, previous to 1870. Recent editions are given in

A Study of Fairy Tales · 第 4 / 6 章