There had been a respite, a sort of armed truce, in political circles as

long as the exposition lasted, but when the Chambers met again in

November, it was evident that things were not going smoothly. The

Republicans and Radicals were dissatisfied. Every day there were

speeches and insinuations against the marshal and his government, and

one felt that a crisis was impending. There were not loaves and fishes

enough for the whole Radical party. If one listened to them it would

seem as if every préfet and every general were conspiring against the

Republic. There were long consultations in W.'s cabinet, and I went

often to our house in the rue Dumont d'Urville to see if everything was

in order there, as I quite expected to be back there for Christmas. A

climax was reached when the marshal was asked to sign the deposition of

some of the generals. He absolutely refused--the ministers persisted in

their demands. There was not much discussion, the marshal's mind was

made up, and on the 30th of January, 1879, he announced in the Conseil

des Ministres his irrevocable decision, and handed his ministers his

letter of resignation.

We had a melancholy breakfast--W., Count de P., and I--the last day of

the marshal's presidency. W. was very blue, was quite sure the marshal

would resign, and foresaw all sorts of complications both at home and

abroad. The day was gloomy too, grey and cold, even the big rooms of the

ministry were dark. As soon as they had started for Versailles, I took

baby and went to mother's. As I went over the bridge I wondered how many

more times I should cross it, and whether the end of the week would see

me settled again in my own house. We drove about and had tea together,

and I got back to the Quai d'Orsay about six o'clock. Neither W. nor

Count de P. had got back from Versailles, but there were two

telegrams--the first one to say that the marshal had resigned, the

second one that Grévy was named in his place, with a large majority.

[Illustration: M. Jules Grevy, reading Marshal MacMahon's letter of

resignation to the Chamber of Deputies. From _L'Illustration_,

February 8. 1879.]

W. was rather depressed when he came home--he had always a great

sympathy and respect for the marshal, and was very sorry to see him

go,--thought his departure would complicate foreign affairs. As long as

the marshal was at the Elysee, foreign governments were not afraid of

coups d'état or revolutions. He was also sorry that Dufaure would not

remain, but he was an old man, had had enough of political life and

party struggles--left the field to younger men. The marshal's letter was

communicated at once to the Parliament, and the houses met in the

afternoon. There was a short session to hear the marshal's letter read

(by Grévy in the Chamber of Deputies) and the two houses, Senate and

Chamber of Deputies, were convoked for a later hour of the same

afternoon. There was not much excitement, two or three names were

pronounced, but every one felt sure that Grévy would be the man. He was

nominated by a large majority, and the Republicans were

jubilant--thought the Republic was at last established on a firm and

proper basis. Grévy was perfectly calm and self-possessed--did not show

much enthusiasm. He must have felt quite sure from the first moment that

he would be named. His first visitor was the marshal, who wished him all

possible success in his new mission, and, if Grévy was pleased to be the

President of the Republic, the marshal was even more pleased not to be,

and to take up his private life again.

There were many speculations as to who would be charged by Grévy to form

his first cabinet--and almost permanent meetings in all the groups of

the Left. W.'s friends all said he would certainly remain at the Foreign

Office, but that depended naturally upon the choice of the premier. If

he were taken from the more advanced ranks of the Left, W. could not

possibly stay. We were not long in suspense. W. had one or two

interviews with Grévy, which resulted in his remaining at the Foreign

Office, but as prime minister. W. hesitated at first, felt that it would

not be an easy task to keep all those very conflicting elements

together. There were four Protestants in the ministry, W., Léon Say, de

Freycinet, and Le Royer. Jules Ferry, who took the Ministry of Public

Instruction, a very clever man, was practically a freethinker, and the

Parliament was decidedly more advanced. The last elections had given a

strong Republican majority to the Senate. He consulted with his brother,

Richard Waddington, then a deputy, afterward a senator, president of the

Chamber of Commerce of Rouen, and some of his friends, and finally

decided to accept the very honourable, but very onerous position, and

remained at the Foreign Affairs with Grévy, as prime minister.

If I had seen little of him before, I saw nothing of him now, as his

work was exactly doubled. We did breakfast together, but it was a most

irregular meal--sometimes at twelve o'clock, sometimes at one-thirty,

and very rarely alone. We always dined out or had people dining with us,

so that family life became a dream of the past. We very rarely went

together when we dined out. W. was always late--his coupé waited hours

in the court. I had my carriage and went alone. After eight or ten days

of irregular meals at impossible hours (we often dined at nine-thirty) I

said to Count de P., W.'s chef de cabinet: "Can't you arrange to have

business over a little earlier? It is awful to dine so late and to wait

so long," to which he replied: "Ah, madame, no one can be more desirous

than I to change that order of things, for when the minister dines at

nine-thirty, the chef de cabinet gets his dinner at ten-thirty." We did

manage to get rather more satisfactory hours after a little while, but

it was always difficult to extract W. from his work if it were anything

important. He became absorbed, and absolutely unconscious of time.

The new President, Grévy, installed himself at once at the Elysée with

his wife and daughter. There was much speculation about Madame Grévy--no

one had ever seen her--she was absolutely unknown. When Grévy was

president of the National Assembly, he gave very pleasant men's

dinners, where Madame Grévy never appeared. Every one (of all opinions)

was delighted to go to him, and the talk was most brilliant and

interesting. Grévy was a perfect host, very cultivated, with a

marvellous memory--quoting pages of the classics, French, and Latin.

Madame Grévy was always spoken of as a quiet, unpretending

person--occupied with domestic duties, who hated society and never went

anywhere--in fact, no one ever heard her name mentioned. A great many

people didn't know that Grévy had a wife. When her husband became

President of the Republic, there was much discussion as to Madame

Grévy's social status in the official world. I don't think Grévy wanted

her to appear nor to take any part in the new life, and she certainly

didn't want to. Nothing in her former life had prepared her for such a

change, and it was always an effort for her, but both were overruled by

their friends, who thought a woman was a necessary part of the position.

It was some little time before they were settled at the Elysée. W. asked

Grévy once or twice when Madame Waddington might call upon his wife--and

he answered that as soon as they were quite installed I should receive a

notice. One day a communication arrived from the Elysee, saying that

Madame Grévy would receive the diplomatic corps and the ministers' wives

on a fixed day at five o'clock. The message was sent on to the

diplomatic corps, and when I arrived on the appointed day (early, as I

wanted to see the people come in, and also thought I must present the

foreign ladies) there were already several carriages in the court.

[Illustration: M. Jules Grévy elected President of the Republic by the

Senate and Chamber of Deputies meeting as the National Assembly. From

_l'Illustration_, February 8. 1879.]

The Elysee looked just as it did in the marshal's time--plenty of

servants in gala liveries--two or three huissiers who knew

everybody--palms, flowers, everywhere. The traditions of the palace are

carried on from one President to another, and a permanent staff of

servants remains. We found Madame Grévy with her daughter and one or two

ladies, wives, I suppose, of the secretaries, seated in the well-known

drawing-room with the beautiful tapestries--Madame Grévy in a large gold

armchair at the end of the room--a row of gilt armchairs on each side of

hers--mademoiselle standing behind her mother. A huissier announced

every one distinctly, but the names and titles said nothing to Madame

Grévy. She was tall, middle-aged, handsomely dressed, and visibly

nervous--made a great many gestures when she talked. It was amusing to

see all the people arrive. I had nothing to do--there were no

introductions--every one was announced, and they all walked straight up

to Madame Grévy, who was very polite, got up for every one, men and

women. It was rather an imposing circle that gathered around

her--Princess Hohenlohe, German ambassadress, sat on one side of

her--Marquise Molins, Spanish ambassadress, on the other. There were not

many men--Lord Lyons, as doyen of the diplomatic corps, the nonce, and a

good many representatives of the South American Republics. Madame Grévy

was perfectly bewildered, and did try to talk to the ladies next to her,

but it was an intimidating function for any one, and she had no one to

help her, as they were all quite new to the work. It was obviously an

immense relief to her when some lady of the official world came in, whom

she had known before. The two ladies plunged at once into a very

animated conversation about their children, husbands, and various

domestic matters--a perfectly natural conversation, but not interesting

to the foreign ladies.

We didn't make a very long visit--it was merely a matter of form. Lord

Lyons came out with me, and we had quite a talk while I was waiting for

my carriage in the anteroom. He was so sensible always in his

intercourse with the official world, quite realised that the position

was difficult and trying for Madame Grévy--it would have been for any

one thrown at once without any preparation into such perfectly different

surroundings. He had a certain experience of republics and republican

manners, as he had been some years in Washington as British minister,

and had often seen wives of American statesmen and ministers, fresh from

the far West, beginning their career in Washington, quite bewildered by

the novelty of everything and utterly ignorant of all questions of

etiquette--only he said the American women were far more adaptable than

either French or English--or than any others in the world, in fact. He

also said that day, and I have heard him repeat it once or twice since,

that he had _never_ met a stupid American woman....

I have always thought it was unnecessary to insist upon Madame Grévy's

presence at the Elysée. It is very difficult for any woman, no longer

very young, to begin an entirely new life in a perfectly different

milieu, and certainly more difficult for a Frenchwoman of the

bourgeoisie than any other. They live in such a narrow circle, their

lives are so cramped and uninteresting--they know so little of society

and foreign ways and manners that they must be often uncomfortable and

make mistakes. It is very different for a man. All the small questions

of dress and manners, etc., don't exist for him. One man in a dress coat

and white cravat looks very like another, and men of all conditions are

polite to a lady. When a man is intelligent, no one notices whether his

coat and waist-coat are too wide or too short and whether his boots

are clumsy.

Madame Grévy never looked happy at the Elysée. They had a big dinner

every Thursday, with a reception afterward, and she looked so tired when

she was sitting on the sofa, in the diplomatic salon, making

conversation for the foreigners and people of all kinds who came to

their receptions, that one felt really sorry for her. Grévy was always a

striking personality. He had a fine head, a quiet, dignified manner, and

looked very well when he stood at the door receiving his guests. I don't

think he cared very much about foreign affairs--he was essentially

French--had never lived abroad or known any foreigners. He was too

intelligent not to understand that a country must have foreign

relations, and that France must take her place again as a great power,

but home politics interested him much more than anything else. He was a

charming talker--every one wanted to talk to him, or rather to listen to

him. The evenings were pleasant enough in the diplomatic salon. It was

interesting to see the attitude of the different diplomatists. All were

correct, but most of them were visibly antagonistic to the Republic and

the Republicans (which they considered much accentuée since the

nomination of Grévy--the women rather more so than the men). One felt,

if one didn't hear, the criticisms on the dress, deportment, and general

style of the Republican ladies.

[Illustration: The Elysée Palace, Paris]

I didn't quite understand their view of the situation. They were all

delighted to come to Paris, and knew perfectly well the state of things,

what an abyss existed between all the Conservative party, Royalists and

Bonapartists, and the Republican, but the absence of a court didn't make

any difference in their position. They went to all the entertainments

given in the Faubourg St. Germain, and all the société came to theirs.

With very few exceptions they did only what was necessary in the way of

intercourse with the official world. I think they made a mistake, both

for themselves and their governments. France was passing through an

entirely new phase; everything was changing, many young intelligent men

were coming to the front, and there were interesting and able

discussions in the Chambers, and in the salons of the Republican

ministers and deputies. I dare say the new theories of liberty and

equality were not sympathetic to the trained representatives of courts,

but the world was advancing, democracy was in the air, and one would

have thought it would have interested foreigners to follow the movement

and to judge for themselves whether the young Republic had any chance of

life. One can hardly imagine a public man not wishing to hear all sides

of a question, but I think, _certainly_ in the beginning, there was such

a deep-rooted distrust and dislike to the Republic, that it was

impossible to see things fairly. I don't know that it mattered very

much. In these days of rapid travelling and telephone, an ambassador's

rôle is much less important than in the old days when an ambassador with

his numerous suite of secretaries and servants, travelling by post,

would be days on the road before reaching his destination, and when all

sorts of things might happen, kingdoms and dynasties be overthrown in

the interval. Now all the great measures and negotiations are discussed

and settled in the various chancelleries--the ambassador merely

transmits his instructions.

I think the women were rather more uncompromising than the men. One day

in my drawing-room there was a lively political discussion going on, and

one heard all the well-known phrases "le gouvernement infect," "no

gentleman could serve the Republic," etc. I wasn't paying much

attention--never did; I had become accustomed to that style of

conversation, and knew exactly what they were all going to say, when I

heard one of my friends, an American-born, married to a Frenchman of

very good old family, make the following statement: "Toute la canaille

est Républicaine." That was really too much, and I answered: "Vous êtes

bien indulgente pour l'Empire." When one thinks of the unscrupulous (not

to use a stronger term) and needy adventurers, who made the Coup d'Etat

and played a great part in the court of the Second Empire, it was really

a little startling to be told that the Republicans enjoyed the monopoly

of the canaille. However, I suppose nothing is so useless as a political

discussion (except perhaps a religious one). No one ever converts any

one else. I have always heard it said that the best political speech

never changed a vote.

The first person who entertained Grévy was Prince Hohenlohe, the German

ambassador. They had a brilliant reception, rooms crowded, all the

official world and a fair contingent from the Faubourg St. Germain. The

President brought his daughter with him (Madame Grévy never accepted any

invitations) and they walked through the rooms arm-in-arm, mademoiselle

declining the arm of Count Wesdehlen, first secretary of the

German Embassy.

However, she was finally prevailed upon to abandon the paternal support,

and then Wesdehlen installed her in a small salon where Mollard,

Introducteur des Ambassadeurs, took charge of her and introduced a great

many men to her. No woman would ask to be introduced to an unmarried

woman, and that of course made her position difficult. The few ladies

she had already seen at the Elysée came up to speak to her, but didn't

stay near her, so she was really receiving almost alone with Mollard.

Grévy was in another room, très entouré, as he always was. The

diplomatic corps did not spare their criticisms. Madame Grévy received

every Saturday in the afternoon, and I went often--not every time. It

was a funny collection of people, some queerly dressed women and one or

two men in dress coats and white cravats,--always a sprinkling of

diplomatists. Prince Orloff was often there, and if anybody could have

made that stiff, shy semicircle of women comfortable, he would have done

it, with his extraordinary ease of manner and great habit of the world.

Gambetta was installed in the course of the month at the Palais Bourbon,

next to us. It was brilliantly lighted every night, and my chef told me

one of his friends, an excellent cook, was engaged, and that there would

be a great many dinners. The Palais Bourbon had seen great

entertainments in former days, when the famous Duc de Morny was

Président de la Chambre des Députés. Under Napoleon III his

entertainments were famous. The whole world, fashionable, political, and

diplomatic thronged his salons, and invitations were eagerly sought for

not only by the French people, but by the many foreigners who passed

through Paris at that time. Gambetta must have been a curious contrast

to the Duc de Morny.

We went to see a first function at the Elysée some time in February, two

Cardinals were to be named and Grévy was to deliver the birettas.

Mollard asked to see me one morning, telling me that the two ablegates

with their suite had arrived, and wished to pay their respects to me.

One of them was Monsignor Cataldi, whom we had known well in Rome when

we were living there. He was a friend of my brother (General Rufus King,

the last United States minister to the Vatican under Pia Nono), and came

often to the house. He was much excited when he found out that Madame

Waddington was the Mary King he had known so well in Rome. He had with

him an English priest, whose name, curiously enough, was English. They

appeared about tea-time and were quite charming, Cataldi just as fat and

cheerful and talkative as I remembered him in the old days in Rome. We

plunged at once into all sorts of memories of old times--the good old

times when Rome was small and black and interesting--something quite

apart and different from any other place in the world. Monsignor English

was much younger and more reserved, the Anglo-Saxon type--a contrast to

the exuberant Southerners. We asked them to dine the next night and were

able to get a few interesting people to meet them, Comte et Comtesse de

Sartiges, and one or two deputies--bien-pensants. Sartiges was formerly

French ambassador in Rome to the Vatican, and a very clever diplomatist.

He was very autocratic, did exactly what he liked. I remember quite well

some of his small dances at the embassy. The invitations were from ten

to twelve, and at twelve precisely the musicians stopped playing--no

matter who was dancing, the ball was over. His wife was an American,

from Boston, Miss Thorndike, who always retained the simple, natural

manner of the well-born American. Their son, the Vicomte de Sartiges,

has followed in his father's footsteps, and is one of the most serious

and intelligent of the young diplomatists.

Cataldi made himself very agreeable, spoke French perfectly well, though

with a strong Italian accent. He confided to me after dinner that he

would have liked to see some of the more advanced political men, instead

of the very conservative Catholics we had invited to meet them. "I know

what these gentlemen think; I would like to talk to some of the others,

those who think 'le clericalism c'est l'ennemi,' and who are firmly

convinced that the soutane serves as a cloak for all sorts of underhand

and unpatriotic dealings; I can only see them abroad, never in Rome." He

would have talked to them quite easily. Italians have so much natural

tact, in discussing difficult questions, never irritate people

unnecessarily.

W. enjoyed his evening. He had never been in Rome, nor known many

Romans, and it amused him to see how skilfully Cataldi (who was a

devoted admirer of Leo XIII) avoided all cross-currents and difficult

questions, saying only what he intended to say, and appreciating all

that was said to him.

Henrietta and I were very anxious to see the ceremony at the Elysée, and

asked Mollard, Introducteur des Ambassadeurs and chef du Protocole--a

most important man on all official occasions, if he couldn't put us

somewhere in a corner, where we could see, without taking any part. W.

was of no use to us, as he went officially, in uniform. Madame Grévy was

very amiable, and sent us an invitation to breakfast. We found a small

party assembled in the tapestry salon when we arrived at the Elysée--the

President with all his household, civil and military, Madame and

Mademoiselle Grévy, three or four ladies, wives of the aides-de-camp and

secretaries, also several prominent ecclesiastics, among them Monsignor

Capel, an English priest, a very handsome and attractive man, whom we

had known well in Rome. He was supposed to have made more women converts

to Catholicism than any man of his time; I can quite understand his

influence with women. There was something very natural and earnest about

him--no pose. I had not seen him since I had married and was very

pleased when I recognised him. He told me he had never seen W.--was most

anxious to make his acquaintance.

While we were talking, W. came in, looking very warm and uncomfortable,

wearing his stiff, gold-embroidered uniform, which changed him very

much. I introduced Capel to him at once. They had quite a talk before

the Archbishops and ablegates arrived. The two future Cardinals,

Monseigneur Pie, Archbishop of Poitiers, and Monseigneur Desprey,

Archbishop of Toulouse, were well known in the Catholic world. The

Pope's choice was generally approved. They were treated with all due

ceremony, as befitted princes of the church. One of the Elysée carriages

(always very well turned out), with an escort of cavalry, went to fetch

them, and they looked very stately and imposing in their robes when they

came into the room where we were waiting. They were very different,

Monseigneur Pie tall, thin, cold, arrogant,--one felt it was a trial for

him to receive his Cardinal's hat from the hands of a Republican

President. Monseigneur Desprey had a kind good expression. I don't think

he liked it much either, but he put a better face on the matter.

Both Cardinals said exactly what one imagined they would say--that the

traditional fidelity of France to the church should be supported and

encouraged in every way in these troubled days of indifference to

religion, etc. One felt all the time the strong antagonism of the church

to the Republic. Grévy answered extremely well, speaking with much

dignity and simplicity, and assuring the Cardinals that they could

always count upon the constitutional authority of the head of the state,

in favour of the rights of the church. I was quite pleased to see again

the red coats and high boots of the gardes nobles. It is a very showy,

dashing uniform. The two young men were good-looking and wore it very

well. I asked to have them presented to me, and we had a long talk over

old days in Rome when the Pope went out every day to the different

villas, and promenades, and always with an escort of gardes nobles. I

invited them to our reception two or three nights afterward, and they

seemed to enjoy themselves. They were, of course, delighted with their

short stay in Paris, and I think a little surprised at the party at the

Foreign Office under a Republican régime. I don't know if they expected

to find the rooms filled with gentlemen in the traditional red

Garibaldian shirt--and ladies in corresponding simplicity of attire.

[Illustration: Her Majesty Queen Victoria, about 1879. From a photograph

by Chancellor, Dublin.]

My First Years as a Frenchwoman, 1876-1879 · 第 9 / 14 段