BY P. KIRKPATRICK PICARD, M.D., M.R.C.S.

In these days, when sanitation claims a large share of attention,

and when questions relating to the public health are canvassed and

discussed on all sides, it may be of service to ask what lessons are to

be learned from the diet, habits, and customs of the Jews. It is not

generally known that their health and longevity are superior to those

of other races, a fact which has been noted by careful observers from

early times in this and other countries. An experiment, extending over

thousands of years, has been made as to the sanitary value of certain

laws in the Mosaic code. The test has been applied in the most rigid

way, and if it had failed at any period in their eventful history,

their name alone, like that of the Assyrian and Babylonian, would

have remained to testify to their existence as a nation. The three

deadly enemies of mankind—war, famine, and pestilence—have at times

been let loose upon them. They have stood firm as a rock against the

crushing power of oppression, when exercised at the call of political

or religious antipathy. They have been pursued with relentless

persecution, from city to city, and from one country to another, in the

name of our holy religion. Restricted as to their trade, singled out

to bear the burden of special taxation, confined in the most miserable

and unhealthy quarters of the towns where they were permitted to dwell,

living in the constant fear of robbery without redress, of violence

without succor, of poverty without relief, of assaults against their

persons, honor, and religion without hope of protection; in spite of

woe after woe coming upon them, like the waves of a pitiless sea, they

have not been broken to pieces and swallowed up, leaving not a wreck

behind. No other race has had the fiery trials that they have gone

through, yet, like the three Hebrew youths in the furnace, the smell of

fire is not found on them. To-day their bodily vigor is unequalled, and

their moral and mental qualities are unsurpassed.

How has it happened that, after being compassed about for centuries

with so many troubles, they have at the present time all the requisites

that go to form a great nation, and are, in numbers, energy, and

resources, on a level with their forefathers in the grandest period of

their history? It is not enough to say that all this has come to pass

according to the will of God, and that their continued existence is

owing to His intervention on their behalf. No doubt it is a miracle in

the sense that it is contrary to all human experience, for no other

nation has lived through such perilous times of hardship and privation.

But as it was in the wilderness so it has been in all their wanderings

down the stream of time; the miracle was supplemented by the use of

means, without which God’s purpose regarding them would have failed.

The blessing of long life and health, promised to them by the mouth

of Moses, has not been withheld. Several texts might be quoted, but

one will suffice. In Deuteronomy iv. 40, we read, “Thou shall keep

therefore his statutes, and his commandments, that it may go well with

thee, and with thy children after thee, and that thou mayest prolong

thy days upon the earth, which the Lord thy God giveth thee, for ever.”

With a promise so rich with blessing, conditional on their obedience,

they have through all the ages been monuments of God’s faithfulness,

and are to this day in the enjoyment of its advantages.

The following statistics, for which I am indebted to the kindness of

Dr. A. Cohen, who has collected them from different sources, will serve

to prove their superiority in respect of health and longevity. In the

town of Fürth, according to Mayer, the average duration of life amongst

the Christians was 26 years, and amongst the Jews 37 years. During

the first five years of childhood the Christian death-rate was 14 per

cent. and the Jewish was 10 per cent. The same proportion of deaths, it

is said, exists in London. Neufville has found that in Frankfort the

Jews live eleven years longer than the Christians, and that of those

who reach the age of 70 years 13 are Christians and 27 are Jews. In

Prussia, from 1822 to 1840, it has been ascertained that the Jewish

population increased by 3½ per cent. more than the Christian, there

being 1 birth in 28 of the Jews to 1 in 25 of the Christians, and 1

death in 40 of the Jews to 1 in 34 of the Christians.

These data are sufficient to verify the statement that the Jews are

endowed with better health and greater longevity than Christians. It

will therefore be inferred that some peculiarity exists which gives

them more power of resisting disease, and renders them less susceptible

to its influence. In virtue of this property their constitution

readily accommodates itself to the demands of a climate which may be

too severe for other non-indigenous races. Take as an example the

statistics of the town of Algiers in 1856. Crebassa gives the following

particulars—Of Europeans there were 1,234 births and 1,553 deaths;

of Mussulmans 331 births and 514 deaths; of Jews 211 births and 187

deaths. These numbers afford a remarkable illustration of the “survival

of the fittest.”

Their unusual freedom from disease of particular kinds has been

often noticed, and amounts nearly to immunity from certain prevalent

maladies, such as those of the scrofulous and tuberculous type,

which are answerable for about a fifth of the total mortality. Their

comparative safety in the midst of destructive epidemics has often

been the subject of comment, and was formerly used as evidence against

them, on the malicious charge of disseminating disease. At the present

day, and in consonance with the spirit of the age, the matter has

come within the scope of the scientific inquirer, with the view of

ascertaining the cause of this exceptional condition.

A peculiarity of this sort must lie in the nature of things in the

distinctive character of their food, habits, and customs. Their more

or less strict adherence to the requirements of the Mosaic law, and

to the interpretation of it given in the Talmud, are familiar to all

who come in contact with them. To this code we must therefore look for

an explanation of the facts under review; and here it may be stated

that no prominence is given to one set of laws over another. They all

begin with the formula, “And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying,” thus

making no difference in point of importance between the laws of worship

and those of health. These latter, therefore, carried with them the

sanctions of religion, and were as much a matter of obligation as any

other religious duty. It will thus be easily seen how the interweaving

of the several laws relating to health and worship had the effect

of giving equal permanence to both, so that as long as the one was

observed the other would be in force. Though many of the details might

appear arbitrary, a fuller knowledge of sanitary science has revealed

a meaning not recorded in the sacred text. Moses, who was versed in

all the learning of the Egyptians, was evidently acquainted with the

laws of health, which he embodied in his code under divine direction.

Those who are firm believers in the inspiration of the Scriptures will

have no difficulty in believing that principles, given by God for the

preservation of the health of the Israelite in olden times, and to

which he is still obedient with great apparent benefit, are likely to

be beneficial in their effect on the general community. Truths of this

kind are like the laws of nature, universally applicable. They never

grow old by lapse of time or effete by force of circumstances.

This part of the Mosaic code is mainly concerned with details relating

to food, cleanliness, the prevention of disease, and the disinfection

of diseased persons and things. The Jews observe in eating flesh-food

the great primary law, which was given to Noah after the Flood (Gen.

ix. 4): “But the flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood

thereof, shall ye not eat,” It was enforced in the Mosaic dispensation

(Lev. xvii. 10), under the penalty of being cut off for disobedience,

and in the Christian era was confirmed at the Council of Jerusalem

(Acts xv. 20), when the Apostle James, as president, gave sentence that

the Gentiles who are turned to God should abstain from blood. To this

day the animal (whether beast or bird) is killed with a sharp knife in

such a way that the large blood vessels in the neck discharge the blood

most freely, and so drain the flesh to the utmost extent possible, and

as an additional precaution the veins, which in certain places are

difficult to empty, are removed before the part can be used as food; so

that it would appear every needful measure is adopted to prevent the

ingestion of the forbidden fluid. On this account game that is shot is

not eaten by the orthodox Jew, as the blood is retained by that mode of

death.

Before the slain animal is pronounced kosher, or fit for food, a

careful search is made by experts for any evidence of disease. These

men have to satisfy the Shechita Board, which takes cognisance of these

matters, that they have a competent knowledge of morbid structures

before being authorised to affix the official seal, without which no

meat is considered wholesome. That this practice is far from being

unnecessary may be gathered from the fact that in a recent half-yearly

report presented to the board the following particulars occur:—Oxen

slain, 12,473, kosher, 7,649; calves slain, 2,146, kosher, 1,569;

sheep slain, 23,022, kosher, 14,580. These numbers show that out of 37

beasts slain 14 were rejected as unsound, and not allowed to be eaten

by the Jew. The less-favored Christian, not being under such dietary

restrictions, would have no hesitation in buying and consuming this

condemned meat. It is even alleged that a larger proportion of diseased

animals than is here stated is exposed for sale in the Metropolitan

Meat Market, and used as food by purchasers of all classes. Whether

this be so or not, the fact remains that the Jewish portion of the

community have the sole benefit of arrangements specially designed

for the maintenance of health. This state of things demands urgent

attention, and has surely a claim prior to many other subjects which

occupy the time of our legislators.

The Mosaic law, in forbidding the use of blood as food, gives as the

reason that the blood is the life. It follows, therefore, if the animal

be unhealthy its blood may be regarded as unhealthy. But as the blood

may be diseased without external or even internal evidence such as is

open to common observation, the total prohibition of it obviates the

risk that might otherwise be incurred.

Modern science has discovered in the circulation of diseased animals

microscopic organisms of different forms, each characteristic of some

particular disease. They are parasitic in their nature, growing and

multiplying in the living being, though they are capable of preserving

their vitality outside the body. Some, like the bacillus, which is

supposed to cause tuberculosis, may even be dried without losing their

vital properties, and on entering the system be able to produce the

disease proper to them. Others will develop in dead organic substances,

but increase more abundantly in living structures. They are very

plentiful in the atmosphere of certain localities, and settling on

exposed wounded surfaces, or finding their way into the lungs and

effecting a lodgment in the blood and tissues, they generate, each

after its kind, specific infective diseases. When the blood becomes

impregnated by any special organism, a drop may suffice to propagate

the disease by inoculation in another animal. The mode of entrance

of these morbid germs may be by inhalation, by inoculation, and by

the ingestion of poisonous particles with the food. Any person living

in unhygienic circumstances, and whose system is from any cause in a

condition suited for the reception of these organisms, cannot safely

eat meat which may contain them in the blood. In the splenic fever of

cattle, for instance, which is communicable to man, these germs are

exceedingly numerous, and the same may be said of the other specific

febrile diseases. Eventually there is a deposit of morbid material in

the tissues, where the process of development goes on till a great

change in the once healthy structures is effected.

With the light derived from recent investigation we are able to

understand the wisdom and foresight of the Mosaic injunction as well

as appreciate its supreme importance. The Jew, like the Christian,

is exposed to the inroads of disease when he breathes an infected

atmosphere and eats tainted food, provided he is susceptible at the

time to the morbific influence, but he is protected by a dietary rule

at the point where the Christian is in danger. The Jew who conforms

to the law of Moses in this particular must have a better chance of

escaping the ravages of epidemics than those who are not bound by these

restrictions. This hygienic maxim goes far to explain the comparative

freedom of the Jewish race from the large class of blood diseases.

The examination of the carcass is also necessary with the view of

determining the sound or unsound condition of the meat. At one time

it was doubted that the complaints from which animals suffer could

be communicated by eating their flesh, but the evidence of eminent

authorities has definitely settled the question. Such bovine diseases

as the several varieties of anthrax, the foot and mouth disease, and

especially tuberculosis, are now believed to be transmissible through

ingested meat. It has been proved that the pig fed with tuberculous

flesh becomes itself tuberculous, and the inference is fair that

man might acquire the disease if subjected to the same ordeal. This

last disease is very common amongst animals, and is now recognised

as identical with that which is so fatal to the human race. It is

considered highly probable that the widespread mortality caused by this

malady is due in a great degree to the consumption of the milk and meat

of tuberculous animals. That the milk supply should be contaminated is

a very serious affair for the young, who are chiefly fed on it. The

regular inspection of all dairies by skilled officials is imperatively

necessary to ward off a terrible and growing evil; just as a similar

inspection of slaughter-houses is demanded in the interests of the

meat-eating portion of the community.

Temperance is a noteworthy feature in the habits of the Jews. Their

moderation in the use of alcoholic drinks is deserving of the highest

commendation. Very rarely are they rendered unfit for business by

over-indulgence in this debasing vice. In no class of Jewish society is

excessive drinking practised. The poorest, in their persons, families,

and homes, present a marked contrast to their Christian neighbors in

the same social position. The stamp on the drunkard’s face is very

seldom seen on the countenance of a Jew. He is not to be found at the

bar of a public-house, or hanging idly about its doors with drunken

associates. His house is more attractive by reason of the thrift that

forms the groundwork of his character. Domestic broils, so common an

incident in the life of the hard-drinking poor, are most unusual. When

work is entrusted to him insobriety does not interfere with the due

and proper performance of it, hence his industry meets with its reward

in the improvement of his circumstances. This habit of temperance amid

abounding drunkenness, more or less excessive, is probably one of the

causes of the protection afforded to him during the prevalence of

some epidemic diseases, such as typhus, cholera, and other infectious

fevers. His comparative freedom from the ravages of these terrible

complaints has been chronicled by observers, both mediæval and modern,

and is now a subject of common remark. The latest instance of this

immunity is furnished by the records of the deaths from cholera in the

south of France, where it is affirmed that out of a considerable Jewish

population in the infected districts only seven fell victims to the

disease, a fact which ought to receive more than a passing notice in

the interests of humanity.

Another point that may be mentioned is the provision made by the Jewish

Board of Guardians for the indigent poor. It has been said that no

known Jew is allowed to die in a workhouse. When poverty, or sickness

involving the loss of his livelihood, occurs, charity steps in and

bestows the help which places him above want, and tides him over his

bodily or pecuniary distress. The mother is also seasonably provided

with medical and other comforts when her pressing need is greatest. In

this way they are saved from the diseases incidental to lack of food,

and after an attack of illness are sooner restored to health than the

majority of the poor, who linger on in a state of convalescence little

better than the ailment itself, and often sink into permanent bad

health from the scanty supply of the necessary nourishment which their

exhausted frames require.

In enumerating the causes which have made the Jewish people so strong

and vigorous, particular mention must be made of their observance of

the Sabbath. This day was appointed for the double purpose of securing

a set portion of time for the worship of God, and of affording rest

to the body wearied with its six days’ labors. The secularising of

this holy day in the history of the French nation has demonstrated

the need of a day of rest and the wisdom of its institution by a

merciful Creator, even before there was a man to till the ground.

Obedience to this primeval law, renewed amid the thunders of Sinai,

and repeated on many subsequent occasions by Moses and the prophets,

is still held by the Jews to be as strictly binding on them as any

other religious obligation. Of the physical blessings derivable from

keeping the Sabbath day they have had the benefit for many long

centuries when other nations were sunk in heathenism and ignorant of

the divine ordinance made to lighten their labors and recruit their

strength. In Christian countries where the Sunday is kept sacred, or

observed as a holiday, another day of rest in addition to their own

Sabbath is obtained, thus fortifying them against the crushing toil and

nervous strain of modern life. The loss accruing from this enforced

abstinence from business worries is more than counter-balanced by the

gain in nerve power with which periodical cessation from any harassing

employment is compensated. This is doubtless one of the factors which

have helped to invigorate both mind and body, and to develop in them

those high qualities for which they are justly distinguished.

To sum up—the longevity of the Jew is an acknowledged fact. In his

surroundings he is on a par with his Christian neighbor. If the

locality in which he dwells is unhealthy, he also suffers, but to a

less degree. If the climate is ungenial, its influence tells on him

too, but with less injurious effect. His vigorous health enables him to

resist the onset of disease to which others succumb. These advantages

are for the most part owing to his food, his temperate habits, and the

care taken of him in sickness and poverty. No doubt he is specially

fortunate in inheriting a constitution which has been built up by

attention, for many centuries, to hygienic details. His meat is drained

of blood, so that by that means morbid germs are not likely to be

conveyed into his system. It is also most carefully inspected so as

to prevent the consumption of what is unsound, hence his comparative

immunity from scrofulous and tuberculous forms of disease.

How can the benefits which the Jews enjoy be shared by other races? In

regard to food, whatever prejudice may stand in the way of draining the

blood from the animal, it ought surely to be done when there is the

least suspicion of unhealthy symptoms; but there can be no doubt about

the urgent necessity for a strict supervision of our meat markets, so

as to prevent the sale of diseased food. Legislation ought to make

such regulations as will render impossible the continuance of an evil

which, by oversight or otherwise, is dangerous to the general health.

Temperance is a virtue within the reach of everybody, and is now widely

practised by all classes, and the gain in improved health will soon be

apparent in the lessening of ailments due to drunkenness. Charity is as

much the duty of the Christian as of the Jew, and it is a dishonor to

the Master whom the former professes to serve if he shuts up his bowels

of compassion when the poor, who have always claims upon him, call in

vain for the needed help. They ought never to be allowed to languish in

sickness and poverty till the friendly hand of death brings a grateful

relief to all their troubles.

The Bible is regarded by some scientists as an old-fashioned book;

but its teaching in relation to hygiene, even they will confess, has

not become antiquated. It must be credited with having anticipated

and recorded for our instruction and profit doctrines which are now

accepted as beyond dispute in this department of knowledge. In the

Mosaic law are preserved sanitary rules, the habitual observance of

which by the Jew, from generation to generation, has made him superior

to all other races in respect of health and longevity.—_Leisure Hour._

Eclectic Magazine of Foreign Literature, Science, and Art, April 1885 · 第 42 / 59 题