CHAPTER XVI

DIAGNOSIS

TICS AND STEREOTYPED ACTS

We have already, on more than one occasion, drawn attention to the

phenomena known as stereotyped acts, demonstrating their intimate

kinship with the tics and the frequent difficulty of establishing a

differential diagnosis. To ensure precision of ideas and of terminology,

we must restrict the expression to motor disturbances in which the

characters of the muscular contraction are identical with those of

normal acts. On this view many motor reactions are really classifiable

as stereotyped acts, and among them are those denominated by Letulle

"habit tics."

Stereotyped acts occur in normal individuals, and it may fairly be said

there is no one but has his habitual gesture, his movement of

predilection. As a matter of fact, a certain number of what Letulle

calls co-ordinated tics belong to the group under consideration; others,

no doubt, are genuine tics, and between the two may be found innumerable

intermediate varieties.

From the diagnostic standpoint the stereotyped acts that occur in the

course of mental disease, of which a conscientious study has recently

been made by Cahen,[168] are highly instructive. He defines them as

non-convulsive, co-ordinated attitudes or movements, resembling

intentional or professional acts, repeated at frequent intervals and

always in the same fashion, till their conscious and voluntary

performance is replaced by a degree of subconscious automatism. In the

case of the insane they are secondary to some delusion, and persist

though the latter may disappear. Hence the patient may be incapable of

explaining his movements and attitudes, however much he may persevere in

their automatic execution--an evolutionary process akin to that of the

tics.

A typical instance may be quoted from Séglas:

B. passed under observation in 1891, suffering from delusions of

persecution, and not long afterwards it was noticed that from time

to time he used to come to a halt in the courtyard, gaze at the

sun, and rotate his hands round an imaginary axis. The reply he

vouchsafed to interrogation on this point was that he was effecting

the sun's revolution. At present, however, he has sunk into a state

of dementia, and while the gesture continues he is unable to

furnish any explanation of it.

Of course it is inadmissible to apply the term to co-ordinated acts that

are neither conscious nor voluntary, such as the teeth grinding of the

general paralytic, or the body oscillation of the idiot. Similarly one

must differentiate them from impulsive seizures, abrupt irresistible

motor explosions neither frequent nor prolonged.

A distinction has been drawn between _akinetic_ (attitude) stereotyped

acts and _parakinetic_ (movement) stereotyped acts. As instances of the

former we may give the following:

A woman reclines continuously in bed because she believes she has

an infernal machine in her abdomen.

Another patient sits on the ground all day long, buttoning and

unbuttoning his clothes.

An old gymnast maintains while he stands a professional attitude

in which his head is raised, his right fist closed on his hip, his

right leg crossed in front of the left, and his right foot elevated

vertically.

Conditions such as these present the most intimate analogies to our

attitude tics, though in the case of the latter there is always a more

or less pronounced exaggeration of muscular contraction, a certain

degree of tonic convulsion.

Parakinetic stereotyped acts are of common occurrence, and embrace every

variety of movement or gesture.

A former acrobat leaps staircases, climbs railings, exercises his

arms rhythmically and regularly, etc.

A patient promenades untiringly in the same corner and at the same

pace.

An old engraver, now a dement, passes the day in reproducing in a

more or less modified form certain actions associated with his

former profession.

Alike in tics and in stereotyped acts, a time comes when the motor habit

establishes itself, for no apparent reason or purpose; hence the

co-existence of the two classes in chronic delusional insanity, in

dementia precox, in catatonic states, in systematised mental disease of

other forms, and in general paralysis.

Stereotyped acts may be the embodiment of ideas of persecution and of

grandeur, or the outcome of mystical, hypochondriacal, and other states.

A patient with delusions of persecution writhes because he is being

"electrified." A hypochondriac rests motionless because he believes

himself made of glass. A mystic maintains an attitude of genuflexion for

hours at a time.

Obsessions also play a part in the genesis of the acts we have under

consideration, but of all delusional ideas those of defence are the most

fertile in this respect.

A patient under the care of A. Marie used to carry a fragment of glass

between his teeth and other pieces beneath the soles of his feet, the

idea being that they formed insulating cushions whereby to protect

himself from the electricity of his enemies.

The suggestion was thrown out by Bresler that the movements of tic are

often of a defensive character--that the disease, in fact, is a sort of

"defence neurosis" linked to hyperexcitability of psychomotor centres.

This theory is not unlike the view of hysteria taken by Brener and

Freud, and as the movements themselves are usually of the nature of

mimicry, Bresler has proposed the term _mimische Krampfneurose_.

In some cases of mental torticollis, the attitude assumed may be

considered as a stereotyped act. Martin has recorded an example of

torticollis in relation to melancholia. Another of his patients suffered

from rotation of the head to the left, a position which could easily be

rectified by asking the man to make the sign of the cross. The moment he

put his finger on his forehead the displacement of the head was

corrected. If, however, he were requested to look straight in front of

him, he remained incapable of altering the vicious attitude, the reason

he advanced being that he could no longer see the sun.

One cannot but be struck with the remarkable analogies to the cases

given by Cohen. And it is worth remembering further, that sometimes

mental torticollis degenerates into actual dementia.

TICS AND SPASMS

Nothing is more arduous, at first sight, than the differentiation of a

tic from a spasm, the similarity of their external forms being a fertile

source of confusion. Yet the establishment of a correct diagnosis is of

prime importance, since in their case prognosis and treatment alike are

diametrically opposed.

Tic is a psychical affection capable of being cured, if one can will to

cure it: at the worst we may fail, but there is no idea that it is

indicative of a grave organic lesion prejudicial to life. A spasm, on

the contrary, though it appear in almost identical garb, is excited by a

material lesion on which depends the degree of its gravity. The focus of

disease may disappear, no doubt, but it is only too likely to persist

and to occasion other disorders. Hence the desirability of making sure

of one's diagnosis--a proceeding not necessarily of insuperable

difficulty. If we apply the principles of diagnosis enunciated by

Brissaud, to which our attention has already been directed, we shall not

find the task beyond our powers.

Let us take a concrete instance.

Here is a cabman, forty-nine years of age, the left half of whose

face is the seat of convulsive twitches. These commenced eighteen

months ago by brief insignificant contractions of the left

orbicularis palpebrarum, which have gradually spread to the whole

of the muscular domain supplied by the left facial nerve. Their

momentariness and rapidity, their apparent independence of

extraneous stimuli, their indifference to treatment and resemblance

to the twitches produced by electrical excitation, their occurrence

in sleep, the fact of voluntary effort, of attention or

distraction, serving so little to modify their range and

intensity--all make clear the spasmodic nature of the condition.

The motor manifestation is the consequence of irritation at some

point on a bulbo-spinal reflex arc; its abruptness and

instantaneousness negative the possibility of recognising in it any

sign of functional systematisation. It is not a co-ordinated act of

a purposive nature, but a simple, unvarying, constant motor

reaction to a particular stimulus. That its intensity should be in

direct proportion to the intensity of the latter, changing from

feeble contractions to a state of transient tetanus, is further

proof of its spasmodic origin. When the excitation is at its

maximum, there is sometimes involvement of the opposite side of the

face, by virtue of the law of the generalisation of reflexes.

It is true there is no association of pain with his attacks, as in

so-called tic douloureux, but the spasm is heralded by a tingling

sensation below and to the inner side of the outer corner of the

eye. This sensation, "like an electric battery," persists during

the spasm and disappears in the intervals. Its occurrence suggests

that the ascending branch of the infraorbital nerve, springing

from the trigeminal, is affected, and indeed pressure over its

point of emergence evokes a certain amount of pain. Moreover, there

is occasionally a flow of tears when the spasm is at its height. It

may be difficult to decide whether this is the result of mechanical

compression of the lachrymal gland or an exaggerated secretion of

tears under the influence of stimulation of the lachrymo-palpebral

twig of the orbital nerve. In any case the pathogeny of this facial

spasm is entirely comparable to that of tic douloureux of the face,

and it is quite within the bounds of possibility that a minute

hæmorrhage--for the patient is of a very florid type--somewhere on

the centrifugal path of the trigemino-facial reflex arc, may be

giving rise to the phenomena.

What we wish to insist on, however, is the dissimilarity between

this facial spasm and tic. In the movements we have been describing

we fail to distinguish any purposive element, any co-ordination for

the fulfilment of a particular function: they are not imitative in

character, nor do they express any sentiment; no impulse precedes

their execution, no satisfaction follows.

The patient's mental state presents no peculiarities, as far as we

have been able to discover. There is no volitional debility or

instability; if he cannot control the convulsions, it is to be

remarked that he cannot control them even for a moment, whereas all

sufferers from tic are capable of inhibiting it for a longer or

shorter period by an effort of the will, by concentrating their

attention on it.[169]

The following remarks on this case are due to Professor Joffroy:

If the patient be asked to open his mouth, the spasm of the left

cheek remains in abeyance at long as it is open, but the platysma

of the same side then begins to twitch spasmodically. Or if he be

requested to shut his eyes, so long as they continue closed the

cheek is quiescent; but, on the other hand, both orbiculares

palpebrarum, as well as the pyramidal muscles and the adjacent

fibres of the frontalis, are seen to contract irregularly. There is

a sort of transference of spasm, and this is of peculiar interest,

inasmuch at it affords evidence that the lesion is not so

restricted as one might suppose.

The explanation no doubt is to be sought in the law of the

diffusion of reflexes, confirming the diagnosis of an irritative

lesion at some point on the trigemino-facial reflex arc.

In the differential diagnosis of spasm assistance may be obtained by a

consideration of the following points:

The extreme abruptness of the movement recalls the contractions produced

by electrical stimulation.

There is no purposive or co-ordinated feature in the spasm, which is

confined to some nerve area anatomically limited.

Volition, attention, distraction, emotion, all fail to effect any

modification of the phenomena.

No irresistible impulse precedes their manifestation, nor is it

succeeded by a feeling of satisfaction. Sometimes the spasm is

accompanied by severe pain.

As a general rule the patient's mental state does not present the

anomalies met with so frequently among those who tic.

Important information may be gleaned from a scrutiny of the condition

during sleep. Should the convulsive movement persist, it may be said

with confidence to be a spasm; whereas if it completely disappear, it is

probably a tic. Whether a spasm may vanish in sleep, however, is another

question, which clinical observation has not yet satisfactorily

answered, and if no other indication of organic disease be forthcoming,

the problem must in the present state of our knowledge be left unsolved.

A. Tic or Spasm of the Face

In cases where the face is the seat of the convulsive movements this

problem of diagnosis becomes one of the utmost nicety. That a

distinction may be drawn, however, is universally admitted.

Hallion,[170] for instance, specifically separates clonic spasms due to

structural changes from the "nervous movements" of neuroses such as

chorea or tic. Facial spasm is rigorously limited to the distribution of

the nerve, and is commonly the result of some alteration in it effected

by causes similar to those that occasion facial paralysis.

Clonic spasms of the face are occasionally a sequel to local

traumatism--that is to say, they are the result not of direct but of

reflex excitation of the facial nerve. Tic douloureux belongs to this

class. Tic non-douloureux also is sometimes merely a simple reflex

spasm.

One of the most pregnant of Brissaud's lessons is devoted to the

elucidation of this part of our subject, and we have already made

several quotations from it. In many cases he is forced to say, "I

decline to hazard a diagnosis when etiology is silent." We too have been

face to face with this diagnostic difficulty on several occasions, and

it may be instructive to give the details of one or two cases where no

definite conclusion could be arrived at.

A man thirty-seven years of age had been suddenly seized with

facial paralysis on the left side thirteen years before,

accompanied after an interval of eight days by bilateral

fronto-temporal cephalalgia, nausea, vomiting, and disturbances of

vision. These attacks recurred irregularly during the next four

years, since when they have ceased, although the palsy persists.

Recently the patient woke up abruptly in the middle of the night to

find that the left side of the face was in a state of spasmodic

contraction, a condition which has continued absolutely without

intermission. There is no pain in relation to the spasm, merely a

peculiar sensation at the site of the muscular twitches. Of what

nature are they?

If we analyse the muscular play somewhat more closely, we observe

that with the exception of the frontalis all the muscles of the

left face, including the platysma, contribute. On a background of

more or less permanent contraction are outlined short, incomplete,

greatly varying twitches, affecting one muscle after another, and

sometimes only a few fibres, in a highly erratic way. The march of

the movements obeys no law, either of space or time, nor is there

any co-ordination in their activity. That the condition is one of

tic, therefore, is scarcely conceivable. No purposive element is

discoverable in the phenomena, no systematisation, no expression

of emotional excess. All is disorder, confusion, contradiction.

We should, accordingly, be content to make a diagnosis of spasm,

but an examination of the patient's mental condition must not be

neglected, and in this particular case it is very instructive.

It appears that his imagination has always been singularly fertile,

amounting indeed to eccentricity. The picturesque description he

furnished of the unusual sensations in face and neck lent support

to the view that his muscular activity was intended, consciously or

unconsciously, to free himself from their insistence, so that his

grimacing may have been but a gesture of defence.

But however much his lack of psychical equilibrium may favour the

relegation of his affection to the category of tic, certain

considerations make one question the validity of the hypothesis.

In the first place, it is rather an uncommon functional adaptation

of the facial muscles to utilise them in an attempt to disembarrass

oneself of disagreeable sensations; and in the second it is no less

uncommon for the sufferer from tic to be unable to restrain his

muscles even momentarily, as our patient appears to be. The actual

time of onset of the movements is significant enough, but of

supreme importance is the fact of their supervention in an area

previously the seat of paralysis. To our mind this is more than a

coincidence; from the history supplied by the patient it is plain

that the paralysis was peripheral and that the lesion involved the

facial trunk somewhere in its intracranial course after its

emergence from the side of the pons. Thirteen years later,

convulsive movements appear in the same domain. Taking all the

circumstances into consideration, we think the hypothesis tenable

that the trigeminal is implicated in the pathogeny of the spasm,

although the condition is not strictly comparable to the classic

tic douloureux.

The exact nature of the lesion is more difficult to determine. A

review of the details of the facial palsy suggests its vascular

origin, to which theory the headache, nausea, and photophobia of

succeeding days and months--indicating, as they do, a circulatory

disturbance in the basilar region--lend support. With the gradual

restoration of vascular equilibrium the migrainous attacks lessened

in frequency and severity, though the facial trunk remained

compressed, till the spasm appeared, no less suddenly than had the

paralysis. It is feasible that the former, too, is the derivative

of a minute hæmorrhage irritating either the centrifugal or the

centripetal arm of the facial reflex arc, probably the latter,

which would explain the paræsthesiæ.

The possibility of this explanation being accurate is confirmed by

a case reported by Schültz, where facial spasm of ten years'

duration was shown at the autopsy to have been caused by an

aneurism of the left vertebral artery impinging on the facial nerve

in the neighbourhood of the basilar trunk.

The arguments, therefore, which plead in favour of the spasmodic

nature of the condition seem to us so cogent that the hypothesis of

tic must be rejected. We ought not to forget, on the other hand,

that a spasm, of whatsoever origin, may be transformed into a tic

by the perpetuation of a morbid habit.

Let us take a second case, no less instructive than the preceding.

Madame L. was sent to one of us by Professor Pierre Marie. She had

always been nervous, impressionable, and high-spirited, but had

never suffered from fits. At the age of eight years, during

convalescence from one of the exanthemata, she got a chill, and the

very next day developed an acutely painful torticollis, the head

resting on the right shoulder and the chin touching the left

clavicle. A complete cure ensued, but from that time a certain

degree of facial asymmetry was remarked. At the age of eight and a

half menstruation commenced, and it still continues, at the age of

fifty-nine.

From youth she had at intervals been stricken with pains in the

limbs, and with recurrent bilious attacks. Two years ago the death

of her husband was the occasion of great mental strain and

distress. Sixteen months ago she noticed a curious sensation in the

right eye, not painful, accompanied from time to time by blinking

of the lids. Very gradually the convulsive movements spread over

the whole of the right face, and for the last month their frequency

and intensity have been such that rest is an impossibility.

When she came under observation what impressed the mind first was

the remarkable asymmetry of her figure: the right side of the face

was smaller than the left, the right eye appeared to be at a lower

level than the other, while the mouth was strongly deviated to the

right and the chin twisted in the same direction. For a minute or

two the facial contortion held sway, disappearing only to reappear

quickly.

Not solely to the old torticollis was the facial asymmetry

attributable, but also to the convulsive movements of the right

half of the face. The effect of these was to close the right eye,

deflect the nose to the same side, drag the mouth in a similar

fashion, and wrinkle the skin of the chin and neck. Hence was

evolved a unilateral grimace quite unlike any ordinary expression,

resembling rather the facies in contracture secondary to facial

paralysis.

During the next few months there was a gradual change from this

tonic to a clonic stage, in which the movements were of less

frequent occurrence, but more rapid. In repose there was no further

indication of the old facial palsy than the flattening of the

facial lines on the right. Under the influence of any emotion, or

any passing contrariety, or in the course of an animated

conversation, or if circumstances call for their repression, the

spasms increase in number and degree, whereas solitude and

tranquillity favour their subsidence.

A recent development has been the discovery of a means of checking

the spasm--viz. by compressing the larynx with the fingers of the

two hands. Madame L. admits the illogical nature of the

manOEuvre, but extols its efficacy. As a matter of fact, it

sometimes fails of its object.

How, then, is this localised convulsive movement to be designated?

Is it a tic or is it a spasm?

The march of the disease, its painlessness, the absence of any

reaction in sleep, the success of the little laryngeal trick, the

inhibitory effect of the will, the definite influence of attention,

distraction, in short of the psychical condition of the moment--all

plead in favour of its classification in the former category. On

the other hand, we cannot shut our eyes to the fact of the

pre-existence of specific organic disease, and, moreover, the spasm

is strictly confined to the anatomical distribution of the facial

nerve. Even in periods of repose there is a certain amount of

fibrillation on that side. On these counts are we to hazard the

diagnosis of facial trophoneurosis?

A subsequent opportunity of examining the same patient served to

confirm the diagnosis of spasm secondary to facial dystrophy, and

treatment failed to make any impression on the condition.

Our object in giving these cases has been to point out the difficulties

in the way of diagnosis, especially where spasm is superadded to a

mental state that itself predisposes to tic. The wisest plan in many

instances is to confine oneself to a description of the symptoms and to

tabulate the arguments for and against a particular view, without

perpetrating the error of committing oneself.

Many cases labelled convulsive tic might be quoted where the expression

of so definite an opinion ought to have been reserved, as in one

reported by Mayer[171] under the title of convulsive tic consecutive to

infraorbital neuralgia:

A man, thirty-two years of age, had suffered from a severe

infraorbital neuralgia of some weeks' duration, apparently

attributable to a chill. The pains recurred at intervals till their

substitution five years later for slight spasmodic twitches of the

left eyelid, which gradually developed into violent convulsions of

the whole of the left half of the face. These spasms were preceded

by a sensation of numbness in the left ear, while during repose no

modification of facial expression was to be remarked.

Further, there was a history of exactly similar neuralgia and spasm

in the mother of the patient, although in her case the latter had

been the first to appear, and had been replaced after a six years'

interval by left facial neuralgia, which resection of the nerve

failed to relieve.

In these cases the condition is undoubtedly one of painful facial spasm,

inaccurately and unfortunately styled "tic douloureux."

Bruandet[172] has recorded a typical example of right facial hemispasm

consequent on facial neuralgia, in which, however, no certain

macroscopical or microscopical lesion was detected, in either cortex or

bulb. But the mere fact that no structural alteration was discovered

post-mortem cannot invalidate the diagnosis; the imperfection of our

methods of investigation suffices to explain the negative results of

such researches.

B. Tic or Spasm of the Neck--Torticollis Tic and Torticollis Spasm

To make a diagnosis of torticollis, it is essential to satisfy oneself

of the integrity of the bones, muscles, and articulations of the

cervico-scapular region, previous to directing attention to the

psychical state of the patient. In regard to the latter point, the

question of heredity must not be neglected. If personal and hereditary

defects are prominent, the presumption is in favour of mental

torticollis; and if the convulsive movements present the characters of

tic, the diagnosis is practically certain.

In three cases under the observation of Fornaca,[173] for instance,

there is no room for doubt. Not merely was there no sign of irritation

from peripheral sources, but also no one of the three was psychically

normal.

Nevertheless we frequently find ourselves confronted by the question: is

the movement a tic, or is it a spasm? For, strictly speaking, there are

both a torticollis tic and a torticollis spasm, and their separation one

from the other is often a matter of the greatest perplexity.

We must refer the reader to the chapter devoted to mental torticollis

for a consideration of the features of that condition, and we need not

dwell on those cases of spasmodic torticollis that are obviously

occasioned by irritative lesions of nervous centres or conductors. In

this latter category may be placed the case put on record by Oppenheim,

where torticollic spasms were produced by pressure of a cerebellar

tumour on the cranial nerves.

But in the affection known as hyperkinesis of the accessory of Willis we

have little doubt both tics and spasms have been included. Apart from

the cases of spasmodic torticollis, so called, which Babinski has

published and to which reference has already been made, we may be

allowed to cite one or two more, in order to exemplify the differences

of interpretation to which they are liable.

At the Congress of Toulouse two patients were shown by Desterac,[174]

both of whom had suffered since the age of eight from a disease akin

either to Friedreich's disease or to hereditary cerebellar ataxia.

They presented the spastic gait of the former with the involuntary

movements of the latter, in addition to spasm of the hand in

writing, spasmodic movements of the trunk, and spasmodic

torticollis. Both had club foot and scoliosis, and one was

afflicted with spasm of the face and left arm. In his case,

further, there was nystagmus, together with loss of reflexes and

difficulty in articulation, while fibrillary contractions were to

be observed in his muscles. The other patient's reflexes were

exaggerated, and he showed a double extensor response.

In Desterac's opinion their spasmodic torticollis was dependent on this

congenital constitutional affection, which might be regarded as a

_fruste_ form of one of the diseases above mentioned.

Through the kindness of M. Desterac the opportunity has been granted one

of us of examining the two patients, and we should like to point out why

we think his interpretation of their symptoms must be considered with

reserve.

Speaking generally, we thought the cases closely resembled those in

which a long-standing mental torticollis is accompanied with convulsive

movements of the limbs. The scoliosis was not permanent, the deformation

of the foot could be overcome, and at the same time we failed to

convince ourselves of the presence of nystagmus and the absence of the

knee-jerks. Moreover, we happened to observe one of the patients in the

street unawares, and remarked how between two phases of bizarre

contortions his vicious attitudes and convulsive gestures almost

entirely vanished. In fact, the clinical picture seemed to us to be

quite other than that associated with organic disease such as

Friedreich's disease or hereditary cerebellar ataxia.

Another case recently brought before the Neurological Society of Paris

by Marie and Guillain[175] serves even better to illustrate the

intricacies of diagnosis.

The patient was a man of fifty-eight, who for years had exhibited

certain movements apparently of an athetoid nature. His head was

extended and rotated to the right synchronously with elevation and

eversion of the left shoulder, then it passed into flexion. Except

for a few odd movements of the tongue, the face conserved

immobility. In the arms the localisation of the contractions was

mostly proximal, though there were alternating flexion and

extension movements of the fingers which suggested athetosis.

Flexion, inversion, and adduction of the thighs also occurred. The

recti abdominis were similarly involved.

Under the influence of emotion the movements were increased, but

they could not be inhibited by an effort of attention. Their rate

was too slow for chorea. Ordinary voluntary movements were

performed without apparent trouble; the patient was able to dress

himself, and to drink without spilling the liquid. Diminution of

the knee-jerks was noticed, with what seemed to be an extensor

response. Slight scoliosis of the vertebral column and a misshapen

right foot recalled Friedreich's ataxia. There was nothing to

justify a diagnosis of hysteria.

This curious condition dated from the year 1874, when the patient

had a febrile attack, in the course of which pain and tingling

appeared in the toes of the right foot, followed by involuntary

movements of the same member. Analogous symptoms were not long in

appearing in the left arm. Two months later the condition had

become general, but from that time no special modification took

place.

In the subsequent discussion it was remarked by Souques that the case

resembled one recorded by Chauffard[176] as Friedreich's disease with

athetotic attitudes, where the patient was a child with club foot,

diminution of the knee-jerks, and generalised athetotic movements.

Notwithstanding our inability to assign a definite nosographical

position to examples of this kind, we think it desirable to make some

reference to them, in the hope that further observations will aid in

their diagnosis. They at least remind us that convulsions occurring in

the course of organic disease may be simulated by the manifestations of

certain motor neuroses.

TICS AND CHOREAS

A. Sydenham's Chorea

It would be difficult to find a better description of chorea minor than

that given originally by Sydenham himself:

The dance of Saint Guy, chorea Sancti Viti in Latin, is a sort of

convulsion whose incidence is greatest, in both sexes, between the

age of ten and puberty. Its onset is characterised by weakness of

one limb, which the patient drags behind him, and soon the arm of

the same side is affected in the same way. He finds it impossible

to maintain the same position of the arm for two consecutive

moments, however great be his efforts to attain this object. Before

he can bring a full glass to his lips he makes innumerable gestures

and antics, as the convulsive moments of the limb deviate it from

one side to the other, until at length he has piloted the glass

opposite his mouth, when he empties it at a gulp.

If we were to confine ourselves to this description by Sydenham, which

so far as typical cases of the disease are concerned is perfectly

accurate, differentiation between tic and chorea would not be a matter

of any complexity. Unfortunately, however, the varieties of this form of

chorea are legion, and in practice one constantly meets with conditions

suggesting alike the gesticulations of chorea and the convulsive

reactions of tic. Moreover, it has been pointed out by Oddo[177] that

the fact of the habitual exaggeration of tic during the very years when

chorea is liable to appear is calculated to confuse the issue.

He has attempted, however, to specify certain factors in the

differential diagnosis. In the first instance, the form of the movements

is of significance: there is no co-ordination in the muscular play of

the choreic; it is amorphous, indefinable, and erratic, whereas the

gestures of tic are purposive, and may be said to have a shape. One

never sees in chorea a succession of similar movements, but though a

patient be suffering from several tics, each of them is reproduced

always in the same fashion. Unilaterality of distribution is more common

in chorea than in tic; in other words, chorea, more or less, follows

anatomical lines in the regions it affects, whereas the incidence of tic

is physiological.

Both are arhythmic in their manifestation; nevertheless the repetition

of tic is noteworthy for its regularity as compared with the changing

mode and rate of the other. Noir emphasises the diagnostic value of its

frequency, abruptness, and reiteration of identical movements. In a

majority of cases the interference of the will is futile as far as

chorea is concerned, while the victim to tic is usually capable of

restraining his muscular activity at least for a space. The choreic

exhibits his movements in public, but the _tiqueur_ seeks the seclusion

of his own room. The association of tic with obsessional ideas is

frequently encountered, but there is no similar connection between

obsessions and chorea. In addition, the myasthenia, pains, and

alterations in the reflexes that often characterise chorea are awanting

in the other affection.

It cannot be gainsaid, however, that the frequency with which atypical

varieties of chorea occur is inimical to a ready diagnosis, and the

onerous nature of the task is not lessened by the circumstance that many

choreics are the offspring of neuropathic parents and reveal psychical

anomalies comparable to those of the subjects of tic.

In a disease such as variable chorea, which has features in common both

with tic and with chorea properly so called, the problem of diagnosis is

still more complicated, though excellent hints for its solution have

been furnished by Brissaud.[178]

However frequently and warmly the theory of the origin of chorea in

a neuropathic predisposition was advocated by Charcot, the fact of

its usual evolution consecutive to some toxic or infective process

is no less certain. Its incidence is greatest in children and the

adolescent; it runs a regular course of increase and decrease; and

the circumstances which cause the symptoms to vary during this

cycle are never sufficiently potent to bring about even transitory

suppression of them.

It is true that changes in the intensity of the symptoms seem to

confer a remittent character on the affection, but there is nothing

at all comparable to the sudden and unexpected waxing and waning of

the form of chorea at present under consideration. None of the

pathological attributes just mentioned concerns variable chorea,

which, in addition, differs from Sydenham's chorea in two

points--the multiplicity of the types of movement, and the fact

that the patient can voluntarily check his involuntary actions. For

these reasons, assimilation of the two clinical varieties is

impossible, and the confusion of the two in practice need never

occur.

A form of chorea entitled "habit spasm" by Gowers, and "habit chorea" by

Weir Mitchell, has been the subject of further study by Sinkler,[179]

but in all probability the cases of this description reported are

instances of the variable chorea of Brissaud.

B. Huntington's Chorea

In spite of the preponderating etiological significance of heredity and

the constancy of psychical imperfections in the chronic chorea of

Huntington, its confusion with tic is not at all likely to occur.

Difficulties might arise in distinguishing chorea major from variable

chorea, however, and here we have the views of Brissaud to help us.

True chronic chorea is an incurable neurosis, of life-long

duration. We have no trouble in pronouncing a diagnosis of chronic

chorea if the symptoms date back five, ten, or twenty years, but

they must have had a commencement, and the whole problem is to

foretell the course of a chorea as yet only a few weeks or months

old.

The involuntary movements of chronic chorea, like those of

Sydenham's chorea, are illogical, but they are combined in a

co-ordinate manner--that is to say, certain functionally associated

muscular groups act simultaneously as for a particular end: the

patient shrugs his shoulders, closes his fists, cracks his fingers,

utters cries, he swallows, sniffs, sucks in his breath, makes the

sound of kissing, etc, in all of which actions orderly

participation of the musculature in a foreordained way is evident.

Slight twitching of individual muscles and parts of muscles also

occurs.

There is no limitation of the movements to a special division of

the body; on the contrary, they spread from one muscle to another,

and from one segment to another, rapidly and arhythmically. The

gait is by turns skipping, dancing, or stumbling, interrupted by

falls or by abrupt jerks of the loins. Speech is uncertain or

monotonous; writing is incorrect and badly formed, sometimes

illegible. A fact of the utmost importance is that all these

involuntary movements may be modified, abated, relieved, so to

speak, by voluntary movements in an inverse direction. In some

cases the power of willing is still sufficiently developed to

permit of the patient's following his occupation.

The steadily progressing increase in the seriousness of the motor

trouble, paralleled by progressing mental deterioration, is one of the

most significant factors in the differential diagnosis. It is precisely

the variability of the symptoms that distinguishes variable chorea.

C. Hysterical Chorea

The conditions to which the name of hysterical chorea is applied may

assume two forms, the commoner being known as rhythmical chorea, the

other as arhythmical chorea. In the former case the convulsive movements

are usually unilateral, being confined sometimes to a single limb, and

reproducing, for instance, the actions of dancing (saltatory chorea), or

of swimming (natatory chorea), or such professional movements as those

of the blacksmith (_chorée malléatoire_). Occasionally there is a more

or less faithful reproduction of deliberate and purposive acts in the

form of attacks of varying duration, recurring, moreover--and this is

their cardinal feature--at equal intervals.

Under the title of disease of the tics two cases have been published by

Nonne,[180] the first consisting of rhythmical twitches in a man of

forty years, secondary to a head injury, the other presenting similar

appearances, but concerning a young girl of eighteen years who had

sustained a shock. In neither was there any sign of hysteria. The

reporter animadverts on the designation "rhythmical chorea," and

protests that the systematisation and co-ordination of the movements are

very different from the clinical picture of Sydenham's chorea, while

their rhythmical nature does not allow of their being classified as tic.

Sometimes hysterical chorea is arhythmical--that is to say, the

movements are irregular and contradictory, as in ordinary chorea. True

chorea in cases of hysteria comes under this heading, as well as those

cases where hysterical patients imitate the movements of chorea. The

presence of the distinctive characters of hysteria makes a diagnosis of

tic improbable.

The separation of hysterical from variable chorea may be peculiarly

perplexing, as in one of Brissaud's cases, where the patient's

extraordinary mental instability was such as is encountered only in

advanced hysteria, while her disorders of motility were highly

characteristic of what is known as variable chorea.

The condition described as chorea gravidarum may be placed at one time

in the category of hysterical chorea, at another in that of ordinary

chorea. In it there is intense motor restlessness, and accompanying

mental symptoms are not awanting in a majority of instances.

D. Electric Chorea, Bergeron's Chorea, Dubini's Chorea, Fibrillary

Chorea of Morvan

To render the study complete, we may remind ourselves of those still

imperfectly differentiated forms known as electric chorea

(Hénoch-Bergeron) and Dubini's chorea.

Bergeron's chorea affects children chiefly, and is characterised by the

suddenness of its onset and the rapidity with which it attains its

maximum. The movements are abrupt and brief, as though produced by an

electric discharge at regular intervals, but their intensity does not

hinder the execution of voluntary acts. They are sometimes confined to

the head and limbs, most commonly they are generalised, and during sleep

they disappear.

In the opinion of many, Bergeron's chorea is secondary to gastric

disturbance. A cure may be regarded as certain, and indeed frequently

follows the administration of an emetic. Sometimes the effect of the

latter seems to be purely psychical.

Pitres thinks that this condition, as well as the electrolepsy of

Tordeus, is simply a manifestation of infantile hysteria. According to

Noir, there is an affinity between tic and electric chorea, and Ricklin

is inclined to consider the two identical, but further study of the

question is desirable.

Dubini's chorea is ushered in by pains and aches in the region of the

head, neck, and sometimes the loins, and these are succeeded by

electric-like twitches in the segment of a limb, which quickly become

general. Severe convulsive attacks also occur, without loss of

consciousness, entailing actual paresis of the limbs. The duration of

the disease may be days or months, and 90 per cent. of the cases have a

fatal issue. Confusion with tic is impossible.

We need not concern ourselves with so-called paralytic chorea, or with

the fibrillary chorea of Morvan, which is a disease of adolescence,

characterised by fibrillary contractions in the calves and thighs,

passing thence to the trunk muscles and even to the arms; the face and

neck, however, are spared, and during voluntary movement the

fibrillation vanishes. Probably it is merely a variety of the

paramyoclonus of Friedreich.

TIC AND PARAMYOCLONUS MULTIPLEX--TIC AND MYOCLONUS

It is not our intention here to seek to provide a differential diagnosis

between tic and the various conditions usually classed as myoclonus, and

that for two reasons: in the first place, we cannot admit that the

latter form a distinct clinical or nosographical entity, since the term

myoclonus seems simply to be an abbreviation for clonic muscular

convulsion, and is a symptom rather than a clinical syndrome; secondly,

the fact that the tics themselves have been incorporated with myoclonus

involves the investigation of all the published cases with a view to

their critical sifting. This task we have pursued for our own

edification, but to enter on it here would serve no useful purpose, and

we shall rest content with examining succinctly several recent cases

described as myoclonus, in the hope that the prosecution of further

research will introduce order into what is at present chaos.

* * * * *

Among the various forms of myoclonus there is one which presents a

certain individuality, and which was described originally by Friedreich

under the name of paramyoclonus multiplex.

This disturbance of motility supervenes, in patients with a neuropathic

heredity, after some psychical accident such as a sudden fright or

emotion, and consists in clonic muscular convulsions affecting the body

generally, with the exception of the face. The contractions appear

without obvious cause in one or in several muscles, are instantaneous,

involuntary, and usually bilateral, but their most important feature is

their inequality and irregularity. They may or may not effect

displacement of the limbs; in any case they compose neither gesture nor

gesticulation. Volition occasionally seems to have some transient

inhibitory influence over them; they are exaggerated by cold and by

emotion, and usually disappear in sleep.

It is obvious that this account of a typical case precludes the

possibility of any confusion with tic, but the published cases are not

always in conformity with it.

In 1892 Lemoine[181] reported a case where the movements of

paramyoclonus multiplex were accompanied with echolalia and psychical

changes. Raymond quotes an instance of the disease being preceded by

facial tic, and another associated with tremor and choreic movements.

D'Allocco[182] has recorded twenty-four cases of differing forms of

myoclonus, of which nineteen occurred as a family disease, in

conjunction with stigmata of degeneration, epilepsy, and hysteria.

In a patient, aged twenty-six, suffering from general paralysis,

Hermann[183] noted the presence of abrupt, irregular, myoclonic twitches

in the sternomastoids, recti abdominis, adductors, and in some of the

toes and fingers, first on one side and then on the other, also in both

legs, and subsequently in both arms, the face being unaffected.

Jancowicz considers diagnosis possible only in typical cases, and

expresses the opinion that paramyoclonus is a syndrome common to many

affections. Further, Schupfer makes the perfectly justifiable remark

that under this denomination have been included cases of chorea, tic,

hysteria, and rhythmic spasm; others have been secondary to organic

disease of the cerebro-spinal axis, such as rolandic lesions, spinal

muscular atrophy, chronic poliomyelitis, syringomyelia. Others, again,

depend on one or other of the psychoses, others on infective conditions

such as malaria, diphtheria, typhoid, or on intoxications such as

uræmia, mercurialism, or lead poisoning. Only a few recorded cases

cannot be attributed to any of the conditions enumerated above, hence

Schupfer's objection to the promiscuous classification of them all as

paramyoclonus multiplex is quite warranted, in the absence of a uniform

etiology and symptomatology.

Schultze[184] has suggested the term monoclonus for the tics, and he

distinguishes monoclonus, polyclonus, and paraclonus. Embraced in the

last of these is the paramyoclonus of Friedreich, which, according to

Schultze, is usually unilateral, voluntary action diminishing the

intensity of the involuntary movements, whereas the converse is the case

in tic or monoclonus. Mixed forms are met with, however, and Schultze

himself mentions one in which the movements were bilateral and increased

with voluntary activity.

Heldenberg[185] applies the term intermittent functional myoclonus to

twitches occurring from time to time in antagonistic muscles during

voluntary movement, twitches exaggerated by excitement and diminished

with rest. They occur in combination with well-marked vasomotor

phenomena.

The myokymia of Kny and Schultze is characterised by fibrillation, pain,

hyperidrosis, and changes in electrical excitability.

A case which seemed to be a combination of paramyoclonus with Thomsen's

disease has been reported by Hajos[186] under the title myospasmia

spinalis.

There cannot possibly be any hesitation in arriving at a diagnosis

between tonic tic and Thomsen's disease, a condition consisting in

slowness of relaxation of a strongly contracted muscle, and conceivably

due to defective metabolism or organic change in muscular tissue.[187]

Examples such as the above, culled at random from an abundant medical

literature, and variously entitled, will serve to demonstrate the

protean nature of what the medical world is content to call myoclonus,

and if from this collection of motor disorders we may hope to extricate

the tics, there will remain still no inconsiderable labour of

differentiation for the student.

TIC AND ATHETOSIS

The athetotic movements that may accompany hemiplegia are scarcely

likely to be confused with those of tic, but difficulties may arise

where the athetosis is double.

It has been universally remarked that athetotic movements of the face

reproduce the expression of emotions, such as admiration, astonishment,

sorrow, gaiety, etc. Of course the same may be said of the grimaces of

chorea; the latter, however, are usually more abrupt and pass less

readily one into the other. The gesticulations of athetosis are

undulatory, so to speak, and their excess leads to deformities

principally in the direction of forced extension. The musculature is

often rigid, and the reflexes are increased in activity. Sometimes there

is a considerable degree of mental disturbance.

Now, it is precisely in cases where mental deterioration is a prominent

feature that "nervous movements" have been described resembling those of

athetosis, for which the term pseudo-athetosis has been coined. Two

examples may be quoted from Noir.

E. is a girl of eleven years. Her expression is grimacing; her

tongue is often protruded, but never bitten; her head is regularly

flexed or extended, or rotated rhythmically to left or right. The

arms are moved spasmodically at shoulder and elbow, while the hands

are the seat of athetotic movements. She walks curiously, throwing

her feet out in advance without bending her knees. She has a silly

smile, and her mouth almost invariably hangs open. On request she

can keep her hands quite steady, but one observes at once the

effort this entails in the sudden seriousness of her expression.

The ordinary acts of every-day life are performed satisfactorily

enough: she can dress and undress, use a knife and fork, thread a

needle, sew, etc.

J. is eleven years old also. She puckers her lips, contracts her

eyebrows, elevates her alæ nasi; at the same time she exhibits

pseudo-athetotic movements of her fingers which are entirely under

voluntary control.

The question may indeed be asked whether pseudo-athetosis and variable

chorea are not really identical. Further, all sorts of combinations of

athetosis and myotonia have been noted,[188] but more light must be

shed on the subject before any further classification can be attempted.

The following case has recently been published by Marina[189]:

A blacksmith, aged seventeen years, already treated three times for

recurrent chorea, suffered from slow contractions of the shoulder

muscles, involving the elevators and internal and external rotators

successively, and accompanied by movements of the head and arm, and

by twitches of the quadriceps. Nothing seemed to have any influence

over these movements except sleep. The faradic excitability of the

shoulder muscles was augmented, the galvanic excitability

diminished. Application of the constant current to the head and

back sufficed to effect a cure in three weeks.

Marina proposes the term athetotic myospasm for these incessant slow

alternating contractions, impulsive myospasm being employed to signify

convulsive movements of more than one muscular group, purposive yet

irresistible, as in tic and chorea major. Simple myospasm consists of

single twitches in individual muscles, recalling those produced by

electrical excitation. If several muscles are implicated, the condition

is one of multiple myospasm or myoclonus.

TICS AND TREMORS

All tremors, whether they occur during muscular repose or muscular

activity, are distinguished by the relative restriction of their range

and the regularity of their time. The tremors of paralysis agitans,

disseminated sclerosis, senility, toxæmia, hysteria, ex-ophthalmic

goitre, etc., are not liable to be mistaken for tic.

It is true, of course, that tremor is sometimes combined with choreiform

or athetotic movements in patients with psychical stigmata.[190] A

proposal, too, has been made to unite hereditary and functional tremor

and to describe them as a tremor neurosis.[191]

However simple be the diagnosis between tremor and tic, it is worth

while to note in passing the etiology they may have in common. In a case

recorded by van Gehuchten an intention tremor of the right arm

co-existed with a tic of the right sternomastoid.

A sudden twitch of the whole body Letulle particularises as a "tic of

starting," and Noir too thinks that a start of this nature may

constitute a tic, but we are inclined to consider it a generalised

reflex.

TICS AND PROFESSIONAL CRAMPS

We have already had occasion to enlarge on the distinguishing features

of professional or occupation cramps, spasms, or neuroses. Writers,

pianists, violinists, flutists, dressmakers, telegraphists, watchmakers,

milkers, knackers, blacksmiths, shoemakers, tailors, dancers,

embroiderers, barbers, etc., etc., are all liable to suffer from

occupation cramps. In every case the condition is one of inability to

perform the professional movement, and that alone.

Grasset proposes to separate intra-professional from post-professional

spasm, the former consisting in the impossibility of making the

necessary professional movements, the latter in the involuntary

over-reproduction of the familiar act. Properly speaking, the

post-professional spasm is a tic.

We need not do more than remind the reader of the close affinities we

have already seen to exist between tics and professional cramps, and of

the mental instability which both classes of patient present.

L. supplies an instance of variable hemichorea followed by writers'

cramp and later by mental torticollis.

When L. was eight years old choreiform movements of the right arm

began to appear, and soon rendered writing an impossibility. The

disease continued for so long a time that one might not

unreasonably expect to find considerable actual impairment of her

caligraphy. As a matter of fact, it is scarcely affected: the

patient can make her letters correctly, but after each letter she

lifts her pen to allow her fingers to perform an abrupt movement,

then she proceeds.

It cannot therefore be considered a true writers' cramp, but when

she had learnt to write with the other hand it was not long ere

that became the seat of a genuine cramp. The moment she attempted

to make the pen move over the paper her grasp of it tightened and

her fingers stiffened; her wrist would no longer answer her. To

obviate the trouble she used a pencil, at first with complete

success; but the cramp occurred afresh, and she gave up writing

altogether. Prolonged holidaying, however, and respite from the

exercise, had a salutary effect, and to-day there is no trace of

former mischief.

Tics and Their Treatment · 第 17 / 21 章