I ignored Macdonald's reference to idiocy, and went on.

"You see, Mac, what you do is this: you see a boy reading _Dead-wood

Dick_, and you take his paper away from him and possibly whack the

little chap for wasting his time. But you don't kill his interest in

penny dreadfuls, and the result is that in later years he reads the

Sunday paper that supplies the most lurid details of murders and

outrages. My way is to encourage the lad to devour tales of blood and

thunder so that in a short time blood and thunder have no more interest

for him. The reason why most of the literature published to-day is

tripe is that the public likes tripe, and it likes tripe because its

infantile interest in tripe was suppressed in favour of Chaucer and

Shakespeare."

"But," cried Mac, "isn't Shakespeare better for him than tripe?"

"Yes and no. If every poet were a Shakespeare the world would be a

dull place; you need the tripe to form a contrast. The best way to

enjoy the quintessence of roses, Mac, is to take a walk through the

dung-heaps first."

"What books would you advise your pupils to read?" asked Mac.

"In their proper sequence . . . _Comic Cuts, Deadwood Dick, John Bull,

Answers, Pearson's Weekly, Boy's Own Paper, Scout, Treasure Island,

King Solomon's Mines, White Fang, The Call of the Wild, The Invisible

Man,_ practically anything of Jack London, Rider Haggard, Conan Doyle,

Kipling."

"And serious literature?"

"All literature is serious, Mac."

"I mean Dr. Johnson, Swift, Bunyan, Milton, Dryden, and that lot," said

Mac.

A Dominie in Doubt · 第 66 / 83 题