Based on the fundamental theory, I have listed several basic functional
facilities of the brain, exclusively as an introduction to the problem
evaluation.
1. The capacity to build and operate image models (arts, many games,
paranormal qualities...)
2. The capacity to build and operate symbolic models (positive science,
technologies...)
3. The capacity to build and operate purely symbolic models (Quantum
Mechanics...)
4. The capacity to integrate an image into a pre-existing image model
5. The capacity to translate an image model to GCL (description of an image
model)
6. The capacity to translate a symbolic model to GCL (the symbolic model is
associated to a certain case, translated to an image model and described in
words)
7. The capacity to translate an image model to a symbolic model (general
abilities in science)
8. The capacity to translate a symbolic model to an image model
9. The capacity to integrate symbolic information into an image model
10. The capacity to build concept-type image models from a family of image
models
11. The capacity to build a concept-type symbolic model from a family of
symbolic models.
12. The capacity to integrate symbolic information into a symbolic model
13. The speed to build/operate image models
14. The speed to build/operate symbolic models
15. The speed to build long range image models
16. The speed to build long range symbolic models
17. The speed/capacity to update preexisting models
18. The capacity/speed to build shielding models
19. The capacity to build a new model in front of a new external reality
20. The speed of finding a pre-existing model suitable to a new external
reality
21. The speed of activation and deactivation by MZM of a preexisting model
in front of a changing external reality. This implies both finding the
suitable model and initializing it to the given external reality
22. The capacity to operate in time-sharing several models in front of a
complex external reality
This list can continue, as the brain is extremely complex.
For instance:
Endurance parameters (e.g. the quality of the technological implementation),
dynamical parameters (e.g. the speed and stability of the operations, how fast
one can switch from one operation to another in transient and stationary
mode).
In the general theory, the brain appears as having two basic facilities: to
build and operate ZM models associated to external reality, and to act on the
external reality, based on a ZAM model. The facility of action on the external
reality has a number of parameters, starting from building ZAM suitable to the
external reality and ending with the capacity of activation of the action
models.
This possible list of parameters is far from characterizing completely the
brain.
From this we can see the naivete and ridicule of the present so-called
intelligence tests. These tests are ridiculous, because there is no
fundamental theory, which could at least define and correlate the used terms.
My theory says that there are facilities associated to image and to symbolic
models (there are arts and sciences, watches are analog or digital, on
computer screens we have icons and text etc.) We also have facilities
associated with obtaining information from the external reality and facilities
associated with modifying the external reality. A minimum observation of the
external reality suggests four independent groups of IQ tests:
action/knowledge on image/symbolic models. As this is not the case, the
present IQ tests are naive and ridiculous, not only from the point of view of
MDT.
In the following we will give a structure of fundamental IQ tests based on
MDT:
1. The capacity to build M image models
2. The capacity to build YM image models (concept models)
3. The capacity to assimilate image YM
4. The capacity to build symbolic YM
5. The capacity to assimilate symbolic YM
6. The capacity to assimilate image ZM
7. The capacity to build image ZM
8. The capacity to assimilate symbolic ZM
9. The capacity to build symbolic ZM
10. The capacity to assimilate symbolic ZAM
11. The capacity to build symbolic ZAM
12. The capacity to assimilate image ZAM
13. The capacity to build image ZAM
14. The capacity to activate symbolic ZAM
15. The capacity to activate image ZAM
16. The capacity to build image AZM
17. The capacity to activate image AZM
Example: For a person who has to be a public relations representative for a
business, the qualities which will count, on first place, are the capacity to
assimilate symbolic and/or image models and to act based on them. He has to
have a reduced tendency to build own models, in order to be fit to the
requirements of the position. A person who will work in scientific research
has to have capabilities to create new symbolic models.
Among these capabilities, interdependence should exist. We can suppose that
persons who have the tendency to build models will have difficulties to
assimilate external models. Their tendency will be to modify any external
model in a personal manner. At the same time a person with capabilities of
assimilation of external models, will have diffculties in building own new
models, and will not try to modify the assimilated models, even if they are
not suitable to the external reality anymore.
Other parameters associated to the brain are connected with the stability of
these capabilities, on long/ short term, and in normal or extreme conditions.
These parameters will charactrize the reliability of these capabilities in
special conditions.
Based on this theory and further work, a collection of human types will be
possibly established as a list of numerical paramters. As soon as a person is
considered to belong to a specific type, he/she will know that his/her chances
to socially integrate are big, if he/she will pursue the domain where he/she
has adequate qualities.
The above examples are only as an illustration of the capabilities of MDT in
this field. A fundamental theory as MDT cannot be used directly to solve
specific problems. It creates a basis and a referential system, where specific
problems associated with some sections of the extrenal reality can be solved.