ETA 15: Normality tests

Having defined schizophrenia and paranoia, we will describe two tests to

detect these illnesses. T1 and T2 detect schizophrenia, and T2 alone detects

paranoia.

T1. In front of a complex external reality, an individual has to be able to

realize if he/she has enough information to build a suitable model. From the

general theory, we know that the brain will build harmonic/ logic models based

on the available information. This is the problem: we don't know beforehand

how many elements are there in the external reality. The models are built with

what is available. We could not realize that we have not enough information to

build a good model (see general theory: Defieciencies in the design of the

brain). The test wants to verify is we can compensate this design deficiency.

Example: The primary information is: 'a car crashed into a wall'.

The person has to build several models. These models could be, in this

example:

- accident

- test

- movie

- computer game

- cartoon

This is just an example. In an actual situation, the person should not only

build several models, but also develop them progressively, in parallel, along

with new data adding to the initial information.

After a certain accumulation of information, the person might stabilize to a

single model, but if he/she has not enough information, and does not realize

it, this can be a sign that there could be a problem. The test is usually

passed well, if the person maintains his/her flexibility, even after there is

apparently enough information to get stable in a model. The existence of

flexibility is understood as a guarantee that the person has the capability to

build long-range models. And also that he/she has no OMPSM, i.e. is not

paranoid.

There is a game based on this idea: one builds a model, and the other has to

guess what the model is. To do this, he/she has to ask questions to be

answered only by yes and no.

T2. Test for detection of paranoia.

An individual accepts a change in a stable model, if the external reality

imposes it. In a practical situation, the person interacts with external

reality and builds a model, which gives good predictions on the external

reality. At some point, an element of the external reality is changed. If the

person detects the change and corrects the model, as well as the other

interconnected models, this is a good indication of normality. For a person

suspected of paranoia, the model used would be the one supposed to be the

OMPSM.

Paranoid subjects can distort the external reality unlimitedly to make it

compatible with their OMPSM. As a consequence, the test tries to see if the

person suspected of paranoia will modify the supposed OMPSM.

To be applicable, the test as described above, needs to take into account a

design deficiency of the brain, as given in the general theory. Any image

model has a basic problem: on an image model one can't see the importance of

an element or a relationship. The image model remains harmonic for an infinity

of values of importance, given to the elements or relations. Due to this

issue, the paranoid subjects do not realize the presence of their illness.

Except these classical psychiatric illnesses, there are illnesses produced by

dynamical and transitory instabilities of the brain. The illnesses given by

dynamical or transitory problems refer to the loss of models stability in

special conditions or at certain moments of time.

The XZM (illegal models) could also explain a series of problems. The general

theory addresses this issue.

We'll make another note here. The theory is applied here in particular to

normal individuals. The pathological cases are not generally considered at

this level. It is actually absurd to study pathological cases in the absence

of a good model associated to normal persons.

The Brain, A Decoded Enigma · 第 54 / 89 题