Telepathy is considered as a direct communication between two brains. Even
more, this kind of communication is performed at great distance between the
two brains and through any kind of media.
Unfortunately, this kind of transmission of information is not possible, based
on the laws of the nature. In order to transmit information, it is necessary
to transmit energy at the distance. The known fields of forces (electric,
magnetic, electro-magnetic and gravitational) do not meet the requirements for
such a transmission. Even more, even if there is a field of forces which can
propagate at large distance through any kind of material, in order to transmit
information, modulation of the energy, depending on the information, is also
necessary. At the receiver it is necessary to demodulate the energy changes,
in order to get the message.
Some could say that the information could be transmitted by a 'shortcut',
without transmitting the energy at the distance. This interferes with the
basics of the sciences of nature.
Anyways, I believe in natural sciences, and the only conclusion is that, for
now and forever, telepathy, as a direct transmission of information from a
brain to another, does not exist.
MDT explains "telepathy" in the frame of the laws of nature, without any kind
of transmission of information at the distance. The phenomenon is based on the
huge capacity of the brain to process information and on XZM models.
As we know, the basic function of any brain is to make models and to simulate
the possible evolution of them. A model, which is associated with an external
reality, is able to predict the evolution of that external reality. So, at any
moment, we make predictions associated with the external reality, and the
majority of them are good.
Now, let's suppose that a person has a special relation with another person,
as a mother and her child, for instance. The model associated with her child
could have been active for many years. Such a model could become a XZM model.
This XZM is active outside the control of the mother. Such an XZM could
simulate the interaction between the child and different kinds of
environments. When a negative prediction occurs, such a model can transmit a
message to the local-ZM. The mother "receives" a message. The "receiver"
cannot find the source and the reason for that message, because an XZM-model,
not belonging to the normal structure of models, transmits the message. It is
very easy to consider that such a message is transmitted by "telepathy".
So, MDT considers that such messages are generated by simulation on an XZM-
model and so, they are just predictions. In some cases, such predictions could
be correct (the predictions which are not correct are forgotten !!!). Such
messages are not related with the external reality.
Some of such predictions could also be obtained during a hypnosis session,
because hypnosis is associated only with XZMs.
The same basic explanation is valid for the clairvoyance phenomenon. In such a
case, the XZM is associated with a specific external reality, or with an
illness.
Such predictions could be correct for many situations, but, because they are
just predictions, there is a limited guarantee on their correctness.
Example: a person was "seen" by a clairvoyance medium. This medium was asked
on the status of the heart of that person. The answer was that the heart is in
a good shape. The answer was correct. But there was a "little" problem: that
person was wearing a pacemaker, which was not "seen" by the medium, in
accordance with MDT.
MDT can be used to see how to develop such paranormal qualities. First of all,
for it, let's remember that XZM are image models and so, developing the
interaction with external reality based on image models is strongly
recommended. Also, a natural tendency towards image models is mandatory.
Such persons must be well balanced, or able to obtain a stability status by
different methods, so that the normal structure of models has a reduced
activity. Such persons must have a reduced tendency to control the activity
associated with the problem (to reduce even more the activity of the normal
structure of models).
It is also very important to obtain as much as possible information by direct
interaction (based on image models) with the problem. The information based on
symbolic models could be useful too, after translation on image models.
MDT considers that XZM models are image models. But, there is a supposition
that some symbolic-models could be illegal too. If so, an XZM-symbolic model
could explain, e.g., how some persons can perform extremely complicated
arithmetical operations.