FOUDROYANT AND CONSORTS, IN ACTION WITH THE GUILLAUME TELL. 1800.

During the early part of the year 1800, a British squadron, composed of

the eighty-gun ship Foudroyant, Captain Sir Edward Berry (the same who

was captured in the Leander, after the battle of the Nile, as bearer

of despatches), and bearing the flag of Rear-Admiral Lord Nelson, the

74-gun ship Alexandria, Captain Ball, the 64-gun ship Lion, Captain

Dixon, and the 36-gun frigate Penelope, Captain Blackwood, with two

or three sloops and smaller vessels, was stationed off Malta, then

in French possession, to prevent succors from being thrown into that

island, and to watch the movements of the French ships which were in

that safe port.

Among the latter, lying in Valetta, was the French 80-gun ship

Guillaume Tell, Rear-Admiral Denis Décrès, and Captain Saunier.

The Guillaume Tell was one of the two French line-of-battle-ships which

had escaped from the battle of the Nile, and she had taken refuge at

Malta.

Décrès occupied so exalted a position, afterwards, that it will be

necessary, before beginning the account of a very remarkable battle, to

give some account of his life.

This very distinguished French naval officer was born in 1762, and died

in 1820. He entered the navy early, and won his first promotion under

Count De Grasse, in America, while he afterwards distinguished himself

in the frigate squadron which France sent to the East Indies to annoy

the English commerce. In 1793 he was a “_capitaine de vaisseau_,” but

was deprived of his rank by the Revolutionists, because he was a noble.

Escaping the guillotine, when thousands of others perished, he was

restored to his rank in the navy in 1795. In 1798 he attained the rank

of Rear-Admiral, and in that capacity was present at the capture of

Malta. He then served at the battle of the Nile, and came back to Malta

with the few French vessels that escaped. These were soon blockaded

by the English in the harbor of Valetta. Décrès, in conjunction with

General Vaubois, conducted the defence of Malta, which continued for

seventeen months.

In March, 1800, provisions fell short, and much sickness appeared

in the French garrison, and Décrès concluded to embark about twelve

hundred men on board the Guillaume Tell, and force the blockade.

The English frigate Penelope followed him, but was able to offer no

resistance. The next day Décrès fell in with more English ships, and

the celebrated engagement which we shall relate further on ensued.

Although conquered at last, Décrès received a sword of honor from

the First Consul, Bonaparte, for his conduct, and the English “Naval

Chronicle” says that this was the warmest resistance ever made by a

foreign man-of-war against a superior British force.

Upon his return from captivity in England, Décrès was successively

appointed Prefêt Maritime, Commandant of the Western Fleet, and

Minister of Marine. He continued to act in this capacity as long as the

French Empire lasted; and in it he showed great administrative ability.

During his administration the great works at Cherbourg were materially

advanced; as well as those at Nieuwe Dieppe and Flushing, while the

docks and construction yards of Antwerp were wholly created. He managed

to keep up, and even increase, the strength of the French navy, in

spite of their great losses; and he collected the great flotilla of

Boulogne, which circumstances rendered useless, however.

Napoleon, who made him, in succession, a Count, Grand Cross of the

Legion of Honor, and finally, a Duke, recalled him to his old position

during the Hundred Days; and when the Emperor finally fell, he was

retired by the Bourbon government.

Duke Décrès survived many bloody battles, to be at last assassinated by

his valet. This man, who had been robbing him for a long time, placed a

quantity of powder, with a slow match, under Décrès’ mattress. Stealing

into the Duke’s bedroom at night, he blew him up. The valet, in his

perturbation at what he had done, threw himself out of the window, and

was killed. His master died a few days after, aged 58 years.

And now to return to this celebrated action.

At eleven o’clock at night, on the 30th of March, 1800, the Guillaume

Tell, taking advantage of a strong southerly gale, and the darkness

that had succeeded the setting of the moon, weighed anchor and put to

sea.

About midnight the English frigate Penelope, which was on guard off the

harbor, discovered the French ship, under a press of sail, with the

wind on the starboard quarter. The Penelope at once made the necessary

signals to the other blockading ships, and then tacked, and stood after

the Tell. In half an hour she was close up with the chase, and luffed

up, and gave the Tell her whole broadside; receiving in return, only

the Tell’s chase guns.

The French ship, aware that if she brought to, she would soon have upon

her the whole of the English blockading ships, whose lights could be

already seen on the horizon, wisely kept her course to the northward.

The Penelope was faster than the Tell, and was commanded by an

experienced seaman, and she continued to follow her, and to

occasionally luff, and pour in a broadside, so that, just before

daybreak, the Guillaume Tell’s main and mizzen-top-masts, and her

main-yard came down. She was thus reduced, except her mizzen, to her

head-sails; and these were greatly damaged by the Penelope’s shot. She

had also lost many men from the English frigate’s raking shots.

The Penelope skillfully avoided exposing herself to a broadside from so

powerful a ship, and had the good fortune to escape much damage to her

sails and rigging. She had lost her master, killed, and a few wounded.

About five in the morning the Lion, 64, after pressing sail, arrived

up. Steering between the Penelope and the crippled Guillaume Tell,

and so near to the latter that the yard-arms of the two ships barely

passed clear, the Lion ranged up on the port side of her opponent,

and poured in a destructive double-shotted broadside. The Lion then

luffed up across the bow of the Guillaume Tell, the jib-boom of the

latter passing between the main and mizzen shrouds of the former. Of

course, with an inferior complement of men, the Lion did not wish to

be boarded, and, fortunately for her, the Tell’s jib-boom soon carried

away, leaving the Lion inaccessible to boarders, but in an excellent

position across the Guillaume Tell’s bows. Here the Lion, aided by the

Penelope kept up a heavy fire, for about half an hour, when the Tell

had so damaged the Lion that she was forced to drop astern; still

firing, however, as did the Penelope, whenever an opportunity offered.

At six o’clock the Foudroyant came up. Lord Nelson was not on board,

having been left, sick, at Palermo; and Captain Dixon, of the Lion, was

the senior officer to Captain Sir Edward Perry, of the Foudroyant. The

latter ship, under a crowd of sail, ranged up so close to the Guillaume

Tell that her spare anchor just cleared the Tell’s mizzen-chains, and

called to her to strike; accompanying the summons by a treble-shotted

broadside. The only answer of the French ship was a similar broadside,

which cut away a good deal of the Foudroyant’s rigging. The latter,

having so much sail set, necessarily shot ahead, and did not again

get alongside the Tell for several minutes. Then the two large ships

engaged, and the Guillaume Tell’s second broadside brought down many of

the English ship’s spars, and cut her sails to pieces. She then dropped

alongside the Tell, still firing occasionally; as did the Lion, on the

Tell’s port side, and the Penelope, on her port quarter. Under this

unremitting and galling fire the gallant French ship’s main and mizzen

masts came down; and the Foudroyant, having cleared away the wreck of

her fallen spars, and to some extent refitted her rigging, again closed

with the Guillaume Tell, and after a few broadsides, was nearly on

board her. At eight o’clock the foremast of the Tell fell, and she was

totally dismasted. At a few minutes after eight the gallant Frenchman

was rolling, an unmanageable hulk, with the wreck of her masts

disabling her port guns, and the violent rolling, in her dismasted

state, requiring the lower deck ports, on both sides, to be closed.

The Foudroyant was on one quarter, the Lion on the other, and the

Penelope close ahead. Under these circumstances the Guillaume Tell

struck her colors.

Both the Foudroyant, 80, and the Lion, 64, were in too disabled a

state to be able to take possession of the French 80-gun ship. That

duty devolved upon the Penelope. The other vessels had enough to do to

take care of themselves. Some English brig sloops and a bomb-vessel

witnessed this singular engagement, but appear to have taken no part in

it.

A more heroic defence than that of the Guillaume Tell is not be found

in the record of naval actions; and the defeat in this case was more

honorable than half the single ship victories which have been so

loudly praised. To the Penelope belongs the special credit, next to

the Guillaume Tell herself. Next to the frigate, credit is due to the

Lion. It was, of course, the arrival of the Foudroyant which turned

the scale. Had that ship, single handed, and so nearly matched, met

the Tell, the contest would have been between two of the most powerful

ships that had ever so met, and the chances are that the Guillaume

Tell, so gallantly manned, and so ably commanded, would have come off

the conqueror. This is conceded by all the English accounts.

All of the vessels engaged, except the Penelope, were so damaged that

it was with difficulty they reached port; the Penelope towing the prize

into Syracuse.

The Guillaume Tell was eventually taken to England, and received into

the Royal Navy under the name of Malta, and she long remained one of

the finest ships in the English service.

Naval battles of the world · 第 92 / 200 题