Always stern and cruel, the Roman was now never satisfied unless with

the spectacle of death. Sometimes in the midst of a play or pantomime

the fierce lust of blood would seize him, and he would cry out for a

combat of gladiators or nobles, who instantly obeyed; and after the

fight was over, and the corpses removed, the play would go on as if

nothing had occurred. The banners of the empire still continued to bear

the initial letters of the great words--the Senate and people of Rome.

We have now, in this rapid survey, seen what both those great names

have come to--the Senate crawling at the feet of the emperor, and the

people living on charity and shows. The slaves fared worst of all,

for they were despised by rich and poor. The sated voluptuary whose

property they were sometimes found an excitement to his jaded spirits

by having them tortured in his sight. They were allowed to die of

starvation when they grew old, unless they were turned to use, as was

done by one of their possessors, Vidius Pollio, who cast the fattest of

his domestics into his fish-pond to feed his lampreys. The only other

classes were the actors and musicians, the dwarfs and the philosophers.

They contributed by their wit, or their uncouth shape, or their

oracular sentences, to the amusement of their employers, and were safe.

They were licensed characters, and could say what they chose, protected

by the long-drawn countenance of the stoic, or the comic grimaces of

the buffoon. So early as the time of Nero, the people he tyrannized and

flattered were not less ruthless than himself. In his cruelty--in his

vanity--in his frivolity, and his entire devotion to the gratification

of his passions--he was a true representative of the men over whom he

ruled. Emperor and subject had even then become fitted for each other,

and flowers, we are credibly told by the historians, were hung for many

years upon his tomb.

Humanity itself seemed to be sunk beyond the possibility of

restoration; but we see now how necessary it was that our nature should

reach its lowest point of depression to give full force to the great

reaction which Christianity introduced. Men were slavishly bending at

the footstool of a despot, trembling for life, bowed down by fear and

misery, when suddenly it was reported that a great teacher had appeared

for a while upon earth, and declared that all men were equal in the

sight of God, for that God was the Father of all. The slave heard this

in the intervals of his torture--the captive in his dungeon--the widow

and the orphan. To the poor the gospel, or good news, was preached.

It was this which made the trembling courtiers of the worst of the

emperors slip out noiselessly from the palace, and hear from Paul of

Tarsus or his disciples the new prospect that was opening on mankind.

It spread quickly among those oppressed and hopeless multitudes. The

subjection of the Roman empire--its misery and degradation--were only a

means to an end. The harsher the laws of the tyrant, the more gracious

seemed the words of Christ. The two masters were plainly set before

them, which to choose. And who could hesitate? One said, "Tremble!

suffer! die!" The other said, "Come unto me, all ye that are weary and

heavy laden, and I will give you rest!"

SECOND CENTURY.

Emperors.

A.D.

TRAJAN--(_continued._) Third Persecution of the Christians.

117. ADRIAN. Fourth Persecution of the Christians.

138. ANTONINUS PIUS.

161. MARCUS AURELIUS.

180. COMMODUS.

193. PERTINAX--DIDIUS, and NIGER--Defeated by

193. SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS.

Authors.

PLINY THE YOUNGER, PLUTARCH, SUETONIUS, JUVENAL, ARRIAN, ÆLIAN,

PTOLEMY, (Geographer,) APPIAN, EPICTETUS, PAUSANIAS, GALEN,

(Physician,) ATHENÆUS, TERTULLIAN, JUSTIN MARTYR, TATIAN, IRENÆUS,

ATHENAGORAS, THEOPHILUS OF ANTIOCH, CLEMENT OF ALEXANDRIA, MARCION,

(Heretic.)

THE SECOND CENTURY.

THE GOOD EMPERORS.

In looking at the second century, we see a total difference in the

expression, though the main features continue unchanged. There is still

the central power at Rome, the same dependence everywhere else; but the

central power is beneficent and wise. As if tired of the hereditary

rule of succession which had ended in such a monster as Domitian, the

world took refuge in a new system of appointing its chiefs, and perhaps

thought it a recommendation of each successive emperor that he had no

relationship to the last. We shall accordingly find that, after this

period, the hereditary principle is excluded. It was remarked that, of

the twelve first Cæsars, only two had died a natural death--for even

in the case of Augustus the arts of the poisoner were suspected--and

those two were Vespasian and Titus, men who had no claim to such an

elevation in right of lofty birth. Birth, indeed, had ceased to be a

recommendation. All the great names of the Republic had been carefully

rooted out. Few people were inclined to boast of their ancestry

when the proof of their pedigree acted as a sentence of death; for

there was no surer passport to destruction in the times of the early

emperors than a connection with the Julian line, or descent from a

historic family. No one, therefore, took the trouble to inquire into

the genealogy of Nerva, the old and generous man who succeeded the

monster Domitian. [A.D. 96.] His nomination to the empire elevated him

at once out of the sphere of these inquiries, for already the same

superstitious reverence surrounded the name of Augustus which spreads

its inviolable sanctity on the throne of Eastern monarchs. Whoever sits

upon that, by whatever title, or however acquired, is the legitimate

and unquestioned king. No rival, therefore, started up to contest the

position either of Nerva himself, or of the stranger he nominated to

succeed him. [A.D. 102.] Men bent in humble acquiescence when they

knew, in the third year of this century, that their master was named

Trajan,--that he was a Spaniard by birth, and the best general of Rome.

For eighty years after that date the empire had rest. Life and property

were comparatively secure, and society flowed on peaceably in deep

and well-ascertained channels. A man might have been born at the end

of the reign of Domitian, and die in extreme old age under the sway

of the last of the Antonines, and never have known of insecurity or

oppression--

"Malice domestic, foreign levy, nothing

Could touch him farther!"

No wonder those agreeable years were considered by the fond gratitude

of the time, and the unavailing regrets of succeeding generations,

the golden age of man. Nerva, Trajan, Adrian, Antoninus Pius, Marcus

Aurelius Antoninus--these are still great names, and are everywhere

recognised as the most wonderful succession of sovereigns the world has

ever seen. They are still called the "Good Emperors," the "Wise Rulers."

It is easy, indeed, to be good in comparison with Nero, and wise in

comparison with Claudius; but the effect of the example of those

infamous tyrants made it doubly difficult to be either good or wise.

The world had become so accustomed to oppression, that it seemed at

first surprised at the change that had taken place. The emperors

had to create a knowledge of justice before their just acts could

be appreciated. The same opposition other men have experienced in

introducing bad and cruel measures was roused by their introduction

of wise and salutary laws. What! no more summary executions, nor

forfeitures of fortunes, nor banishments to the Danube? All men equal

before the dread tribunal of the imperial judge? The world was surely

coming to an end, if the emperor did not now and then poison a senator,

or stab his brother, or throw half a dozen courtiers to the beasts!

It is likely enough that some of the younger Romans at first lamented

those days of unlimited license and perpetual excitement; but in the

course of time those wilder spirits must have died out, and the world

gladly acquiesced in an existence of dull security and uninteresting

peace. By the end of the reign of Trajan the records of the miseries of

the last century must have been studied as curiosities--as historical

students now look back on the extravagances and horrors of the French

Revolution. Fortunately, men could not look forward to the times, more

pitiable still, when their descendants should fall into greater sorrows

than had been inflicted on mankind by the worst of the Cæsars, and they

enjoyed their present immunity from suffering without any misgivings

about the future. But a government which does every thing for a people

renders it unable to do any thing for itself. The subject stood quietly

by while the emperor filled all the offices of the State--guarded him,

fed him, clothed him, treated him like a child, and reduced him at

last to childlike dependence. An unjust proconsul, instead of being

supported and encouraged in his exactions, was dismissed from his

employment and forced to refund his ill-got gains,--the population,

relieved from their oppressor, saw in his punishment the hand of an

avenging Providence. The wakeful eye of the governor in Rome saw the

hostile preparations of a tribe of barbarians beyond the Danube; and

the legions, crossing the river, dispersed and subdued them before they

had time to devastate the Roman fields. The peaceful colonist saw, in

the suddenness of his deliverance, the foresight and benevolence of a

divinity. No words were powerful enough to convey the sentiments of

admiration awakened, by such vigour and goodness, in the breast of a

luxurious and effeminate people; and accordingly, if we look a little

closely into the personal attributes of the five good emperors, we

shall see that some part of their glory is due to the exaggerations of

love and gratitude.

Nerva reigned but sixteen months, and had no time to do more than

display his kindness of disposition, and to name his successor. This

was Trajan, a man who was not even a Roman by birth, but who was

thought by his patron to have retained, in the distant province of

Spain where he was born, the virtues which had disappeared in the

centre and capital of the empire. The deficiency of Nerva's character

had been its softness and want of force. The stern vigilance of Trajan

made ample amends. He was the best-known soldier of his time, and

revived once more the terror of the Roman arms. He conquered wherever

he appeared; but his warlike impetuosity led him too far. He trod in

the footsteps of Alexander the Great, and advanced farther eastward

than any of the Roman armies had previously done. But his victories

were fruitless: he attached no new country permanently to the empire,

and derives all his glory now from the excellence of his internal

administration. He began his government by declaring himself as

subordinate to the laws as the meanest of the people. His wife, Pompeia

Plotina, was worthy of such a husband, and said, on mounting the steps

of the palace, that she should descend them unaltered from what she

was. The emperor visited his friends on terms of equality, and had the

greatness of mind, generally deficient in absolute princes, to bestow

his confidence on those who deserved it. Somebody, a member perhaps

of the old police who had made such fortunes in the time of Domitian

by alarming the tyrant with stories of plots and assassinations, told

Trajan one day to beware of his minister, who intended to murder him

on the first opportunity. "Come again, and tell me all particulars

to-morrow," said the emperor. In the mean time he went unbidden and

supped with the accused. He was shaved by his barber--was attended for

a mock illness by his surgeon--bathed in his bath--and ate his meat

and drank his wine. On the following day the informer came. "Ah!" said

Trajan, interrupting him in his accusation of Surenus, "if Surenus had

wished to kill me, he would have done it last night."

[A.D. 117.]

The emperor died when returning from a distant expedition in the

East, and Pompeia declared that he had long designated Adrian as his

successor. This evidence was believed, and Adrian, also a Spaniard by

birth, and eminent as a military commander, began his reign. Trajan had

been a general--a conqueror, and had extended for a time the boundaries

of the Roman power. But Adrian believed the empire was large enough

already. He withdrew the eagles from the half-subdued provinces, and

contented himself with the natural limits which it was easy to defend.

But within those limits his activity was unexampled. He journeyed from

end to end of his immense domain, and for seventeen years never rested

in one spot. News did not travel fast in those days--but the emperor

did. Long before the inhabitants of Syria and Egypt heard that he had

left Rome on an expedition to Britain, he had rushed through Gaul,

crossed the Channel, inquired into the proceedings of the government

officers at York, given orders for a wall to keep out the Caledonians,

(an attempt which has proved utterly vain at all periods of English

history, down to the present day,) and suddenly made his appearance

among the bewildered dwellers in Ephesus or Carthage, to call

tax-gatherers to order and to inspect the discipline of his troops.

The master's eye was everywhere, for nobody knew on what point it was

fixed. And such a master no kingdom has been able to boast of since.

His talents were universal. He read every thing and forgot nothing.

He was a musician, a poet, a philosopher. He studied medicine and

mineralogy, and plead causes like Cicero, and sang like a singer at the

opera. Perhaps it is difficult to judge impartially of the qualities

of a Roman emperor. One day he found fault on a point of grammar with

a learned man of the name of Favorinus. Favorinus could have defended

himself and justified his language, but continued silent. His friends

said to him, "Why didn't you answer the emperor's objections?" "Do

you think," said the sensible grammarian, "I am going to enter into

disputes with a man who commands thirty legions?" But the greatness

of Adrian's character is, that he _did_ command those thirty legions.

He was severe and just; and Roman discipline was never more exact.

The result of this was shown on the grand scale only once during this

reign, and that was in the case of the revolted Jews. We have seen the

state to which their Temple at Jerusalem was reduced by Titus. Fifty

years had now passed, and the passionate love of the people for their

native land had congregated them once more within their renovated

walls, and raised up another temple on the site of the old. They still

expected the Messiah, for the Messiah to them represented vengeance

upon the Romans and triumph over the world. An impostor of the name

of Barcho-chebas led three hundred thousand of them into the field.

They were mad with national hatred, and inspired with fanatical hope.

It took three years of desperate effort to quell this sedition; and

then Adrian had his revenge. The country was laid waste. Fifty towns

and a thousand villages were sacked and burned. The population, once

more nearly exhausted by war and famine, furnished slaves, which were

sold all over the East. Jerusalem itself felt the conqueror's hatred

most. Its name was blotted out--it was called Ælia Capitolina; and,

with ferocious mockery, over the gate of the new capital of Judea

was affixed the statue of the unclean beast, the abomination of the

Israelite. But nothing could keep the Jews from visiting the land of so

many promises and so much glory. Whenever they had it in their power,

they crept back from all quarters, if it were only to weep and die amid

the ruins of their former power.

Trajan and Adrian had now made the world accustomed to justice in its

rulers; and as far as regards their public conduct, this character

is not to be denied. Yet in their private relations they were not so

faultless. Trajan the great and good was a drunkard. To such a pitch

did he carry this vice, that he gave orders that after a certain hour

of the day none of his commands were to be obeyed. Adrian was worse: he

was regardless of life; he put men to death for very small offences. An

architect was asked how he liked a certain series of statues designed

by the emperor and ranged in a sitting attitude round a temple which

he had built. The architect was a humourist, not a courtier. "If the

goddesses," he said, "take it into their heads to rise, they will never

be able to get out at the door." A poor criticism, and not a good

piece of wit, but not bad enough to justify his being beheaded; yet

the answer cost the poor man his life. As Adrian grew older, he grew

more reckless of the pain he gave. He had a brother-in-law ninety years

of age, and there was a grandson of the old man aged eighteen. He had

them both executed on proof or suspicion of a conspiracy. The popular

feeling was revolted by the sight of the mingled blood of two sufferers

so nearly related, at the opposite extremities of life. The old man,

just before he died, protested his innocence, and uttered a revengeful

prayer that Adrian might wish to die and find death impossible! This

imprecation was fulfilled. The emperor was tortured with disease, and

longed for deliverance in vain. He called round him his physicians, and

priests, and sorcerers, but they could give him no relief. He begged

his slaves to kill him, and stabbed himself with a dagger; but in

spite of all he could not die. Lingering on, and with no cessation of

his pain, he must have had sad thoughts of the past, and no pleasant

anticipations of the future, if, as we learn from the verses attributed

to him, he believed in a future state. His lines still remain, but are

indebted to Pope, who paraphrased them, for their Christian spirit and

lofty aspiration:--

"Vital spark of heavenly flame!

Quit, oh, quit this mortal frame!

Trembling, hoping, lingering, flying,

Oh, the pain, the bliss of dying!

Cease, fond nature, cease thy strife,

And let me languish into life!

"Hark! they whisper! angels say,

Sister spirit, come away!

What is this absorbs me quite,

Steals my senses, shuts my sight,

Drowns my spirits, draws my breath?

Tell me, my soul, can this be death?

"The world recedes; it disappears!

Heaven opens on my eyes! my ears

With sounds seraphic ring:

Lend, lend your wings! I mount! I fly!

O Grave! where is thy victory?

O Death! where is thy sting?"

His wish was at last achieved. He died aged sixty-two, having reigned

twenty-one years. In travelling and building his whole time was spent.

Temples, theatres, bridges--wherever he went, these evidences of his

wisdom or magnificence remained. He persecuted the Christians, but

found persecution a useless proceeding against a sect who gloried in

martyrdom, and whose martyrdoms were only followed by new conversions.

He tried what an opposite course of conduct would do, and is said to

have intended to erect a temple to Jesus Christ. "Take care what you

do," said one of his counsellors: "if you permit an altar to the God of

the Christians, those of the other gods will be deserted."

[A.D. 138.]

But now came to supreme authority the good and wise Antoninus Pius, who

was as blameless in his private conduct as in his public acts. His fame

extended farther than the Roman arms had ever reached. Distant kings,

in lands of which the names were scarcely known in the Forum, took him

as arbiter of their differences. The decision of the great man in Rome

gave peace on the banks of the Indus. The barbarians themselves on the

outskirts of his dominions were restrained by respect for a character

so pure and power so wisely used. An occasional revolt in Britain

was quelled by his lieutenants--an occasional conspiracy against his

authority was caused by the discontent which turbulent spirits feel

when restrained by law. The conspiracies were repressed, and on one

occasion two of the ringleaders were put to death. The Senate was for

making further inquiry into the plot. "Let us stop here," said the

emperor. "I do not wish to find out how many people I have displeased."

Some stories are told of him, which show how little he affected the

state of a despotic ruler. A pedantic philosopher at Smyrna, of the

name of Polemo, returned from a journey at a late hour, and found the

proconsul of Rome lodged in his house. This proconsul was Antonine,

who at that time had been appointed to the office by Adrian. Instead

of being honoured by such a guest, the philosopher stormed and raged,

and made so much noise, that in the middle of the night the sleepless

proconsul left the house and found quarters elsewhere. When years

passed on, and Antonine was on the throne, Polemo had the audacity to

present himself as an old acquaintance. "Ha! I remember him," said the

emperor: "let him have a room in the palace, but don't let him leave

it night or day." The imprisonment was not long, for we find the same

Polemo hero of another anecdote during this visit to Rome. He hissed

a performer in the theatre, and stamped and screeched, and made such

a disturbance that the unfortunate actor had to leave the stage. He

complained of Polemo to the emperor. "Polemo!" exclaimed Antonine; "he

forced you off the stage in the middle of the day, but he drove me

from his house in the middle of the night, and yet I never appealed."

It would be pleasant if we could learn that Polemo did not get off so

easily. But the twenty-two years of this reign of mildness and probity

were brought to a close, and Marcus Aurelius succeeded in 161.

[A.D. 161]

The Eighteen Christian Centuries · 第 2 / 39 段