“Out went the taper as she hurried in;

Its little smoke, in pallid moonshine, died:

She closed the door, she panted, all akin

To spirits of the air, and visions wide:

No uttered syllable, or, woe betide!

But to her heart, her heart was voluble,

Paining with eloquence her balmy side;

As though a tongueless nightingale should swell

Her throat in vain, and die, heart-stifled, in her dell.

A casement high and triple-arched there was,

All garlanded with carven imageries

Of fruits, and flowers, and bunches of knot grass,

And diamonded with panes of quaint device,

Innumerable of stains and splendid dyes,

As are the tiger moth’s deep damask’d wings.

And in the midst, ’mong thousand heraldries,

And twilight saints, and dim emblazonings,

A shielded ’scutcheon blush’d with blood of queens and kings.

Full on this casement shone the wintry moon,

And threw warm gules on Madeline’s fair breast,

As down she knelt for heaven’s grace and boon:

Rose-bloom fell on her hands, together prest,

And on her silver cross soft amethyst,

And on her hair a glory like a saint:

She seemed a splendid angel, newly drest,

Save wings, for heaven:—Porphyro grew faint:

She knelt, so pure a thing, so free from mortal taint.

Anon his heart revives: her vespers done,

Of all its wreathed pearls her hair she frees;

Unclasps her warmed jewels one by one;

Loosens her fragrant boddice; by degrees

Her rich attire creeps rustling to her knees:

Half hidden, like a mermaid in sea-weed,

Pensive awhile she dreams awake, and sees,

In fancy, fair St. Agnes in her bed,

But dares not look behind, or all the charm is fled.

Soon, trembling in her soft and chilly nest,

In sort of wakeful swoon, perplex’d she lay,

Until the poppied warmth of sleep oppress’d

Her soothed limbs, and soul fatigued away;

Flown, like a thought, until the morrow-day;

Blissfully haven’d both from joy and pain;

Clasp’d like a missal where swart Paynims pray,

Blinded alike from sunshine and from rain,

As though a rose should shut, and be a rose again.”

And now, when the maiden is all asleep, her lover steals from his hiding

place, and mixing a charm, kneels by her bedside, and while his warm

unnerved arm sinks in her pillow, he whispers to her that he is her

eremite, and beseeches her for sweet Agnes’ sake to open her eyes. But

the maiden, lying there in her holy sleep, awakes not. At length he

takes her lute, and kneeling by her ear, plays an ancient ditty. She

utters a soft moan. He ceases—she pants quick—and suddenly her blue

eyes open in affright, while her lover sinks again on his knees, pale as

a sculptured statue. And Madeline awakening, and thinking that her

blissful dream is over, begins to weep. At length she finds vent for her

words, and are they not sweet as the complainings of a dove?

“Ah! Porphyro!” said she “but even now

Thy voice was at sweet tremble in mine ear,

Made tunable with every sweetest vow;

And those sad eyes were spiritual and clear:

How changed thou art! how pallid, chill, and drear!

Give me that voice again, my Porphyro,

Those looks immortal, those complainings dear!

O leave me not in this eternal woe,

For if thou diest, my love, I know not where to go.”

If you have ever been young, and heard, for the first time, the blushing

confession of her you loved in doubt and danger, you can form some

conception of the bewildering joy which seized Porphyro at this. Egad!

sir, I would give ten years of my life—old as I am—to enjoy such

rapture. But no tongue except that of the poet can even shadow forth his

ecstacy. Ah! to be loved is bliss, but to be loved by a Madeline—!

“Beyond a mortal man impassioned far

At these voluptuous accents, he arose,

Ethereal, flush’d, and like a throbbing star

Seen ’mid the sapphire heaven’s deep repose;

Into her dream he melted, as the rose

Blendeth its odor with this violet,—

Solution sweet:”

You can see the end of all this as well as I can, for though never has

other mortal than Porphyro breathed the language of love into the ears

of one like Madeline, yet we have all pleaded more than once in the ears

of angels only one remove less beautiful. Shut your eyes, and fancy you

see the lover kneeling by the bedside of that white-armed one, fragrant

and pure as a lily in the overshadowed brook—lovelier than an Imogen,

whose very breath perfumes the chamber. Hear her low complainings when

she fancies that her lover is about to desert her. Are they not more

musical than the zephyrs sighing through the moonlit pines? And then how

soothing is Porphyro, and how delicately he allays her fears. Ah! the

moon is down, and the chamber is in darkness—and there, as I live, the

rain-drops are pattering against the casement. Now is thy time, bold

Porphyro—St. Agnes will befriend thee—urge, urge that sweet lady, with

all thy eloquence, to seize the chance and fly amid the confusion. We

know how it will end! Love ever wins the day—and is not Madeline yet

all blushing with her dream? And so—and so—hear the rest!

“She hurried at the words, beset with fears,

For there were sleeping dragons all around,

At glaring watch, perhaps, with ready spears—

Down the wide stairs a darkling way they found,—

In all the house was heard no human sound.

A chain-dropp’d lamp was flickering by each door;

The arras, rich with horsemen, hawk, and hound,

Fluttered in the besieging wind’s uproar;

And the long carpets rose along the gusty floor.

They glide, like phantoms, into the wide hall;

Like phantoms to the iron porch they glide,

Where lay the Porter, in uneasy sprawl,

With a huge empty flagon by his side:

The wakeful bloodhound rose, and shook his hide,

But his sagacious eye an inmate owns:

By one, and one, the bolts full easy slide:—

The chains lie silent on the foot-worn stones;

The key turns, and the door upon its hinges groans.

And they are gone: ay, ages long ago

These lovers fled away into the storm.

That night the Baron dreamt of many a woe,

And all his warrior-guests, with shade and form

Of witch, and demon, and large coffin worm,

Were long be-nightmared. Angela the old

Died palsy-twitch’d, with meagre face deform;

The Beadsman, after thousand aves told,

For aye unsought-for slept among his ashes cold.”

Who, after that, will say that Keats was not a genius? But “Hyperion,”

though less complete than this poem, evinces—let me tell you—even more

of the “_mens divinior_.” “The Eve of St. Agnes” is warm, voluptuous,

luxuriant, yet pure as a quiet pool with silver sand below—but

“Hyperion” is bold, impassioned and colossal, Miltonic even in its

grandeur, overpowering at times as a thunder-storm among the mountains.

Would God that Keats had lived to finish it! With many faults, it

evinces more genius than any poem since written in our language. Hear

the speeches of the Titans!—read the description of Apollo!—drink in

the intoxication of its less sublime but more beautiful passages! It

often exhibits a redundant fancy—the style is at times affected, and

the choice of words bad—the execution is careless, though less so than

that of Endymion—and, above all, the plan of the poem, so far as it has

been developed, bears an unhappy resemblance to Milton’s Paradise Lost.

Yet it displays such extraordinary genius, that we will never forgive

the Quarterly for having disheartened Keats from the completion of this

poem. Ah! sir, what has the world lost?

I repeat it, I am an Epicurean. Fame!—immortality!—what are they? We

wear out our lives for a bauble, and coin our souls away to purchase

dross. We dig our own graves and call it GLORY. Away with such

sophistry! Go over the melancholy list of unfortunate genius—White,

Collins, Keats, Chatterton and the rest—and tell me what they reaped

except thorns! Ah! sir, it melts my heart with pity—I must take a glass

on it. But, I declare, the bottle’s out, and—by my halidome!—here is

Oliver asleep.

J. S.

* * * * *

THE AFFAIR AT TATTLETOWN.

BY EPES SARGEANT.

It is very questionable whether the reader has ever heard a true and

impartial account of the affair at Tattletown. So many exaggerated

versions have been put forth—so many garbled and malicious reports in

regard to it, have been propagated—that the world is likely to be

either unduly prejudiced against one of the parties, or wholly in doubt

as to the merits of both. It is with an emotion of pride, that I take up

my pen with the consciousness of being able to throw light upon this

interesting, but mysterious subject.

There have been many changes in Tattletown during the last twenty years.

Of this fact I became assured the last summer, when, by the way of a

parenthesis in a tour to the White Hills, I branched off from my

prescribed route to visit the little village where I had spent so many

pleasant days in boyhood. What a change! It used to be one of the

quietest, greenest, most sequestered nooks in the world, with its single

wide street, bordered by venerable elms, and its shady by-roads

radiating in every direction, and dotted with white cottages embosomed

in clouds of verdure.

And then its inn! its single, unpretending inn, with its simple

flag-staff, its modest piazza, and its cool, clean parlor, with the vase

of asparagus upon the freshly reddened hearth-stone! Its sleeping-rooms

with their snow-white curtains and coverlets, and the rustling foliage

against their windows—what a temptation it was to enter them of a warm

summer afternoon! Now, forsooth, the respectable old tenement is

replaced by a hotel. I beg pardon—a _house_, built after the style of

the Parthenon, its sides painted very white, and its blinds very green.

The bar-room is floored with tesselated squares of marble, and there is

a white marble counter, behind which presides a spruce young man with

long dark hair plastered over his right ear, and an emerald breast-pin

on his shirt bosom. Nay, it is rumored that the landlord has serious

designs of introducing a gong in the place of the good old-fashioned

bell of our forefathers. What is the country coming to?

Within my remembrance, the people of Tattletown were the best natured,

most industrious and contented people alive. Every evening in summer

their patriarchs might be seen sitting in front of their

woodbine-covered porches, smoking their pipes and talking over old

times, while groups of ruddy, riotous children, flaxen-haired and

blue-eyed, danced to the strains of some village Paganini. Poor,

deluded, miserable Tattletonians! What a sight was it for the

philanthropist to grieve at! Little knew they, of the errors and vices

of the social system! They had not read Miss Martineau’s tracts; knew

nothing of Owenism, nothing of Grahamism, nothing of transcendentalism,

nothing of Fourierism, nothing of Mormonism. The “Society for the

promotion of every thing,” had not established a branch among them. They

were benighted, uninitiated; contented to live as their fathers had

lived before them; to pluck the rose and leave the thorn behind; to keep

their linen and their consciences clean, and to remain at peace with all

mankind.

Then the belles of the village—how beautiful they were! how artless!

how adorned with every sylvan grace! Now they all seem to have lost the

heritage of loveliness. They look didactic, sedentary and precocious.

There is not the same bloom on the cheek—the same sparkle in the

eye—the same ruby mischief on the lip. Instead of cultivating their

music and their flower-gardens, working flags for the Tattletown

“Guardians of Liberty,” and teaching the children their catechisms on

Sundays, they are meddling with matters that they have not the means of

comprehending, establishing _anti-everything_ societies, and fussing

over phrenology and other newfangled heresies. Instead of a vase of

freshly gathered flowers upon their shelves, you are now greeted by a

vile plaster bust, with the skull phrenologically mapped out, and

figured. I never encounter one of the odious things, without putting my

fist in its face.

A religious revolution has, of course, been introduced among the other

mutations. Instead of one well-filled church, where all the villagers

may meet as members of one family, Tattletown can now boast of half a

dozen sectarian societies, which are eternally at war with one another.

Poor old Dr. Balmwell, who is still the meekest of God’s creatures, and

whose annual salary would not equal the one night’s wages of a

second-rate theatrical star, is denounced as a “haughty, over-fed

prelate,” “the advocate of an established church,” and a “vile minion of

the aristocracy.” Many a fair maiden is content to go with holes in her

stockings, in order that she may contribute to the “society for the

support of indigent young men intended for the ministry!”

“Dear smiling village! loveliest of the lawn!

Thy joys are fled, and all thy charms withdrawn.”

As for politics—but here I approach the subject which was uppermost in

my mind at starting. All the world knows that there are, or rather used

to be, two rival newspapers published at Tattletown, the editors of

which manage to keep the poor people in a perpetual ferment. There is

the Tattletown Independent American, edited by Mr. Snobb! and the

Tattletown _Free_ and Independent American, edited by Mr. Fobb. The

former is the longer established of the two, and, as the public are well

aware, is conservative in its tone. Fobb’s hebdomadal, on the contrary,

is characterised by the spirit of innovation. If a doctrine be new,

startling, incredible, abrupt, violating all preconceived notions and

prejudices, it commends itself at once to Fobb’s acceptance. He will

urge it with a boldness and pertinacity that confound the unthinking. To

incur his opposition, it is only necessary that a principle should be

old and well established. His morality would seem to resemble that of

the tribe, with whom it is a custom to kill all their old men and women.

Age is with him the worst of crimes, and the most penal. Novelty is the

first of charms.

Strange as it may seem, Fobb has his devoted admirers and active

supporters. As for Snobb, I am credibly informed, that, disgusted with

the supineness of the Tattletonians, he had at one time resolved to

relinquish the publication of the “Independent American,” when,

unexpectedly, the field was invaded by Fobb with his “Free and

Independent.” Then it was that the patriotism and disinterestedness of

Snobb’s character shone conspicuous. He was, to use his own vigorous

expression, determined to stand to his guns, and however great might be

the pecuniary sacrifice, to remain in the village to combat the

pernicious influence, which, “like the Bohon Upas,” I quote Snobb’s own

words—“would spread poison and desolation among families and

communities.” Snobb wound off his appeal, by calling upon all, who

valued their liberty and their lives; who would save their country from

intestine confusion and slaughter; who would keep unstained the altar of

domestic felicity, and transmit unimpaired that glorious fabric of

constitutional right, cemented by the blood of martyred ancestors—to

rally round him and the Independent American. “Any person obtaining five

subscribers,” said he in conclusion, “shall receive a sixth copy

gratis.”

It is difficult to conceive of the degree of excitement produced in

Tattletown by this fulmination, on the part of Snobb, and the subsequent

establishment of the “Free and Independent American,” on the part of

Fobb. Such a thing as neutrality could no longer exist. Great and vital

principles were at stake; and from the squire to the tinman’s

apprentice, it was necessary that every man should take one side or the

other—should be either a Snobbite or a Fobbite. Both journals were

benefited by this agitation. New subscribers poured in daily, and a fund

was raised by the partisans of each establishment for the more effectual

prosecution of the war. And what was the war about? To this day nobody

can tell.

Personalities now began to be interchanged. Snobb gave Fobb the lie

direct, and defied him to prove a statement which had appeared in the

“Free and Independent,” accusing Snobb of highway robbery, arson and

other little peccadilloes. Fobb treated Snobb’s defiance with an easy

irony, which bewildered the good people of Tattletown, who began to

think that Fobb must know a good deal more of Snobb than other people.

The following answer appeared in the “Independent American:”

“We must apologise to our readers for again polluting our columns with

an allusion to the reckless traducer, whose journal of yesterday came

forth reeking with slanders against ourselves. It would be charitable,

perhaps, to attribute to a diseased intellect, rather than a malicious

temper, these ebullitions of mendacity, but the motive is too obviously

bad. We can assure this poor creature, this beggarly reprobate and

unwashed scribbler, that mere declamation is not proof, and that

assertion carries no weight when unsustained by evidence. If he can keep

sober long enough, let him reply to the question which we once more

reiterate, ‘where are your proofs?’”

It was with intense anxiety that the citizens of Tattletown looked for

the next number of the “Free and Independent.” Never before had Snobb

been so severe, so savage. Fobb’s rejoinder excited public interest in

the quarrel, to a painful degree. It was as follows:

“The guilty fugitive from justice, whom it is with shame we acknowledge

as our contemporary, attempts to invalidate our charges by clamoring for

proofs. We beg him to reflect a moment before he repeats his call. If he

has sincerely striven to make reparation for past misdemeanors, by a

life comparatively guiltless—if there be any hope or prospect of

reformation in his case—most reluctantly would we be instrumental in

re-consigning him to the States-prison or the gallows. Before,

therefore, we come out with any statements, that shall be universally

admitted as final and conclusive as to the character of this man, we

will put a few questions which he will understand, however enigmatical

they may be to others. Did Snobb ever make the acquaintance of Miss

Amanda W——? Did he ever see a white crape scarf that used to belong to

that ill-fated young lady? Does he remember the circumstance of an old

pruning-knife being found beneath a cherry-tree? Has he still got _that

red silk hankerchief_?”

I must leave it for some more graphic pen—to the author of “Jack

Sheppard” or “Barnaby Rudge,” to depict the consternation and horror

produced among the Tattletonians by this publication. Could it be that

Tattletown harbored a murderer? What other interpretation could be put

upon the diabolical insinuations in Fobb’s paper? For a week and more

nothing was talked of but this article. At the post office—the tinman’s

shop—the grocer’s—on the steps of the meeting-houses, no other topic

was broached. With unprecedented eagerness the next number of Snobb’s

paper was looked for and purchased. The only allusion it contained to

Fobb’s ferocious attack was in these simple lines: “As we shall make the

insinuations contained in the last number of the Tattletown Free and

Independent the subject of a judicial investigation, it is quite

unnecessary for us to bestow any farther notice upon the miserable

calumniator, who is striving to get into notice by means of the

attention he may provoke from ourselves.”

Tattletown was disappointed in this rejoinder, and began to entertain

its suspicions as to the truth of Fobb’s intimations. The old women of

the place began to shake their heads and look wise, when the subject was

broached. “They _must_ say they always thought there was something

wrong—something not altogether _easy_ about Mr. Snobb. They hoped for

the best, but there _were_ things—however murder will out.” The fate of

the injured “Amanda” was a topic of endless speculation among the more

youthful of the feminine inhabitants; and there was a delightful mystery

about the “white crape scarf,” which afforded an exhaustless pabulum for

curiosity. Snobb must certainly clear up his character. He must explain

the circumstances in regard to that “ill-fated young lady.” He must tell

the public what became of “that red silk handkerchief.” Above all, he

must satisfactorily account for the horrible fact of the old

pruning-knife being found under the cherry-tree.

In the meantime Fobb declared that he was daily and hourly environed

with the perils of assassination. He was obliged to go armed, to protect

himself from the minions of the culprit Snobb. His fearless devotion to

the cause of truth and justice had “sharpened daggers that were

thirsting for his blood—but what was life compared with the proud

satisfaction of having maintained the cause of the people,

‘Unmoved by flattery and unbribed by gain?’”

In the midst of the excitement produced by this war of words, Tattletown

was electrified one fine morning in December, by the report, that Snobb

and Fobb had gone over to the neighboring village of Bungville to settle

their differences by mortal combat. Two spruce young men from New York

had arrived in the stage-coach the night before, and put up at the

Tattletown house. _They had brought guns with them_; and early that

morning the two editors, similarly armed and equipped, had started off

with the strangers in a wagon belonging to the latter, in the direction

of the village already named. As these facts became currently known

among the Tattletonians the sensation was prodigious. A meeting of the

“select men” was instantly called, and a committee of five, consisting

of Mr. Fuzz, the retired “squire of the village,” Mr. Rattle, the

tinman, Mr. Ponder, the celebrated lecturer on matters and things in

general, Mr. Rumble the auctioneer, and Mr. Blister the apothecary, were

appointed to proceed on horseback to Bungville, and prevent if possible

the duel—or, if that had transpired, to arrest the survivor and the

seconds.

Headed by Mr. Fuzz, the cavalcade started off in gallant style, followed

by the prayers and anxious entreaties of the gentler sex to prevent if

possible the “effusion of blood.” Miss Celestina Scragg, the poetess of

the village, and the author of the celebrated ode to that beautiful

stream, the Squamkeog, came very near being thrown under the hoofs of

the squire’s horse, as she appealed to Mr. Fuzz, and besought him to

rescue Albert, as she tenderly designated Mr. Fobb, or “perish in the

attempt.”

After riding hard for about an hour, the committee approached the

Bungville house, where they determined to make their first inquiries as

to the fate of the editors and their seconds. Mr. Buzz, the landlord,

was a brisk, officious little man, who always knew before you spoke what

you were going to say, and rarely listened to more than the two first

words of any question you might put to him. He was, moreover, a little

deaf, so that the habit of anticipation was, perhaps, as much a matter

of necessity as of choice.

“Have we arrived too late?” asked Fuzz.

“Oh, by more than an hour. It is all over,” replied Buzz, who supposed

that the inquiry had reference to the dinner hour.

“It is all over, gentlemen,” said Fuzz, in a magisterial tone, turning

to his awe-stricken companions. “Has any one been killed or wounded?”

continued he, addressing the landlord.

“Killed, indeed? I guess you would think so,” exclaimed Buzz. “They have

shot one fine, plump fellow.”

“It is probably Snobb. He is the plump one,” said Fuzz, contracting his

lips, and looking sternly round at the members of the committee. “Did he

fall dead on the spot?” he rejoined.

“Dead as Julius Cæsar—I may say very dead,” replied Buzz.

“Serious business this, gentlemen,” said Fuzz, dilating with importance.

Here Mr. Rattle, the tinman, was seen to mount his horse and gallop off

in the direction of Tattletown. He was determined to be the first to

communicate the news of the catastrophe.

“There will be no need of your services, Mr. Blister,” said Fuzz,

bestowing a patronizing glance upon the apothecary. “Have the seconds

escaped, Mr. Buzz?”

“Yes, the second one escaped, but with a bullet in his neck. They

tracked him a mile or two by his blood.”

Graham's Magazine, Vol. XX, No. 4, April 1842 · 第 6 / 13 段