On the 31st of October I wrote to Palmer:--

“The £250 in registered letter duly received to day. With it I have

been enabled to obtain consent to the following:--That, with the

exception of issuing the writs against your mother, no proceeding

as to service shall be made until the morning of Saturday, the

10th, when you are to send up the £1,000 or £1,500. You will be

debited with a month’s interest on the whole of £4,000 out of the

money sent up. I impress upon you the necessity of your being

punctual as to the bills. You will not forget also the £1,500 due

on the 9th of November.”

On the 6th of November I issued writs against Palmer and his mother for

£4,000. I sent them to Mr. Crabbe, a solicitor at Rugeley. On the 10th

of November Palmer called on me. I had received a letter from him on the

9th of November:--

“I will be with you on Saturday next, at half-past one.”

He did call on me, and paid me £300, which, with the two sums I had

before received, made up £800. £200 was deducted for interest, leaving

£600. He was to endeavour to let me have a further remittance, but

nothing positive was said. It is possible that writs were mentioned, but

I have no recollection of it. No doubt he knew of them. [A letter of

November 13 from Pratt to Palmer was then read, in which, after giving

some explanations with respect to the “Prince of Wales” policy, Pratt

said:--“I count most positively on seeing you on Saturday; do, for both

our sakes, try to make up the amount to £1,000, for without it I shall

be unable to renew the £1,500 due on the 9th.”]

The Most Extraordinary Trial of William Palmer, for the Rugeley Poisonings, which lasted Twelve Days · 第 29 / 54 题