CHAPTER I

Transcribed from the 1904 Deighton Bell & Co. edition by David Price,

email ccx074@pglaf.org

THE CHAPEL

ON THE HILL

* * * * *

BY

ALFRED PRETOR

FELLOW OF ST. CATHARINE’S COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE

AUTHOR OF ‘RONALD AND I’

* * * * *

“Some falls are means the happier to arise.”

—_Cymbeline_, IV. 2 _ad fin_

* * * * *

CAMBRIDGE

DEIGHTON BELL & CO.

LONDON GEORGE BELL & SONS

1904

* * * * *

CAMBRIDGE

PRINTED BY JONATHAN PALMER

ALEXANDRA STREET

* * * * *

_To the_

_memory of_

‘_Judy_’

(_Ob. Aug. 27_, _1904_)

“A soul she had on earth.”

—BYRON.

“The more I learn to know man, the better I like dogs.”

—GERMAN PHILOSOPHER.

PREFACE

_To those_, _I think a lessening number_, _who may find themselves at

variance with_ “_my Rector’s_” _theology_, _I tender the following

quotation from one of the ablest and deepest thinkers of the past

century_:

“If, instead of the ‘glad tidings’ that there exists a Being in whom

all the excellences which the highest human mind can conceive exist

in a degree inconceivable to us, I am informed that the world is

ruled by a Being whose attributes are infinite, but what they are we

cannot learn, nor what are the principles of his government, except

that ‘the highest human morality which we are capable of conceiving’

does not sanction them; convince me of it, and I will bear my fate as

I may. But when I am told that I must believe this, and at the same

time call this Being by the names which express and affirm the

highest human morality, I say in plain terms I will call no being

good who is not what I mean when I apply that epithet to my

fellow-creatures.”—J. S. MILL, _Examination of Sir W. Hamilton’s

Philosophy_, pp. 102, 103 (Criticism of Mansel).

_I have omitted from the above the author’s peroration_, _which is

couched in language too strong to suit the taste of the present

generation_.

_That the Bible is our one and only true guide_, _we believe_; _but we

are nowhere instructed to make an idol and a fetish of the form in which

it is presented_. _It was written to suit all times_; _we must read it

in the language of to-day_.

_In the controversy between the Squire and himself the Rector is by no

means guiltless of plagiarism_. _Ford_, _who knew Spain as intimately as

an Englishman can ever know it_, _advances the self-same arguments in his

comments on the national sport_.

_A word more and I have done_. _It is reported on good authority that

one of our greatest divines—the author of_ ‘Butler’s Analogy’—_held a

confident belief in the re-existence of animals_. _They share our doom

of suffering and death_: _why not our promise of happiness beyond_?

_They have done nothing to forfeit their reward_.

_A. P._

CAMBRIDGE,

_August_, 1904.

INTRODUCTION

RIVERDALE and I—to wit one Harold Stirling by name—had been close friends

almost since life began, at our private school, our public school, and

again at college. And we were meeting now for the last time as

undergraduates in Riverdale’s rooms at Cambridge. For the choice that

comes, once at any rate in a lifetime, to all, had come to us, and we had

chosen divergent, to some it would appear antagonistic, careers.

To judge from his personal appearance, Riverdale at any rate had chosen

wisely for himself when he elected to become an artist. Smoking at his

ease, in a picturesque environment of flowers and ferns, pictures and

statuettes, he looked like what he was—a well-to-do indolent dreamer, who

might possibly succeed as a painter, but would never make much of life in

any other line. Fortunately for him he had no need to trouble himself

about the future. A kindly fate had settled all this in advance, when

his only surviving relative, an uncle, had made him a comfortable

allowance of a thousand a year, adding the still more comfortable

assurance that the family estate of Riverdale should be his when the time

came that he himself should have no further use for it.

Study him, as the glow from a reading-lamp falls full on his features,

and you will say that his personality is concentrated in his eyes.

Sapphire blue they would have been called by a casual observer, but it

always seemed to me that they held in them a deeper tint, as of violet or

purple. But whatever their colour, they are about as rare in humanity as

is a blue rose or a green chrysanthemum among the creations of the floral

world. Not that they betoken much character, I think. It is simply

their beauty, and perhaps their rarity, that constitutes the attraction.

At any rate, veiled by long lashes, and set in Italian features, as was

the case with Riverdale, it is impossible to hold them indicative of

energy or activity in life.

It was a strange coincidence that had made bosom friends of two natures

so antagonistic, to all appearance, as Riverdale’s and mine. But it was

a coincidence that occurs oftener than would at first sight seem

possible. Perhaps it is explicable by the well-known theory that every

character is on the search for its complement. If so, it may well be

that my own sturdy directness found its natural relaxation in the

captivating indifferentism of my friend. Anyhow, the companionship had

begun early at school, where a mutual admiration for one’s opposite is

often the secret of a lifelong friendship. And as Riverdale’s good looks

and careless insouciance had always been found irresistible, it was my

own commonplace personality that was envied by my schoolfellows for the

dignity it had acquired by his friendship.

And now that I have given you an idea of my friend, let me for once

attempt the impossible and try to describe myself. An athlete I think I

may call myself, for I have raced and rowed and played cricket and

football ever since I was a boy of ten—of the type which is welcomed in

all our schools as the recognised trainer of youth. Not so very plain, I

hope, and certainly well set up in the way of muscles and sinews. But

quite as certainly not in any way striking like Riverdale, and without

the faintest pretension to anything remarkable in the direction of

beauty. Finally, and to complete the portrait, fair in complexion, with

blue eyes and a slight tendency to freckles, which I abominate. In all

respects a worthy foil to Riverdale’s dreamy picturesqueness.

Left an orphan at an early date, with a comfortable income of £300 a

year, I had never known the want of money, though I had no large balance

to waste on the luxuries that had become necessaries to my friend.

Without any real talent, and notwithstanding my devotion to athletics, I

had taken a fair degree, and learned something of theology under the

guidance of one of the leading minds at Cambridge. Only as yet I had

come to no conclusions outside the main doctrines of our faith; and to

what end my views were shaping themselves I had never paused on my way to

consider. Experience and circumstances, as they developed themselves,

would, I supposed, answer the question, and, having been confronted as

yet by no definite difficulties, I had not troubled to bethink me how I

should meet them.

“And now tell me, Eric,” I asked, “where are all the Cupids and Psyches

and Fauns to go while you are painting dusky Venetians and the

fair-haired beauties of Genoa?”

“Oh, I’ve taken a flat, Harold, in a house overlooking Battersea Park,

and they’ll all be transferred there as soon as I am off to-morrow. By

the way, you must look in on them now and then, and see that they are all

right. And you must have that little gladiator I brought from Rome for

yourself. It would never do to separate you, for I’m sure you’d never be

happy without him. Rather like you, I think he is, with his steady

sturdy gaze, as if he knew he had a tough business before him, but

intended to make the best of it, and worry through. Lucky we weren’t

born in each other’s shoes, any way for me, Harold. I couldn’t have

faced life without funds, but should have drifted down and down till I

ended the business with a dose of morphia.”

“What nonsense, Eric. I do wish you wouldn’t cheapen yourself like that.

You’ve talent enough for both of us, and will be exhibiting in the

Academy while I’m a country curate, and a poor one at that. By the way,

if you don’t mind, I’d sooner have that Antinous than the gladiator. I

don’t particularly want a replica of myself, if it’s all the same to you,

while you might have posed for the Antinous, if you’d been handy; and it

will be better than nothing to have it to look at when I haven’t got the

original on the other side of the table. And now, old friend, good-bye.

It’s past twelve already, and I’ve all my packing to do before the

morning. For I shall be off long before a sybarite like you thinks of

stirring. Let me hear from you now and then, and don’t let the foreign

signoras and Roman models steal all your heart from me.”

The next day we had parted; he to enjoy life and study art in all the

best galleries on the continent, and I to prepare myself for Ordination

in a quiet village of the West.

CHAPTER I

IT was a cheerful scene on which my eye rested as I looked out upon it

from the Rector’s study, while awaiting my introduction to the Rector

himself. Two large bay windows opened on a terrace, from which a short

flight of steps led down to a lawn, fringed with gaily-coloured flower

beds. Through the open windows streamed into the room a veritable flood

of light and air, creating an atmosphere in which sadness and depression

would have been hopelessly out of place.

“Impossible,” I murmured, “to write a gloomy Calvinistic sermon in a room

like this, though it’s strange, by the way, that his letters should have

told me nothing of his views.”

The emerald lawn in the foreground contrasted pleasantly with the violet

haze that rested on the far horizon, and the very air itself seemed

steeped in quiet and repose. Only the song of birds and the mysterious

hum of insect-life broke the stillness of the summer day, to which the

chafing of a trout stream, as it murmured over its rocky bed at the foot

of the Rectory garden, sounded a soft accompaniment.

And out past the Rectory grounds, past the cheery meadow-land beyond,

where reaping was now in progress, I caught a glimpse of the far off sea

and the Isle of Portland lying on the line of the horizon, with a

delicate veil of summer gauze folded about its head. The charm of it all

wove a spell upon me like a dream.

“If the Rector is as nice as his Rectory, I shall have a pleasant time of

it,” I said to myself. And the next moment the unspoken thought was

answered in the affirmative, for I felt my hand warmly grasped by the

gentlest-looking and most benevolent of men. And my heart went out to

him on the instant, as to one whose help and guidance I knew would never

fail me, even when my work under him should be ended, and, whether for

good or evil, laid behind me among the retrospects of life.

“Yes, you’ll do,” he said, after studying me keenly for half-a-minute

with eyes that pierced me through and through. “You look as if you’d

work hard in the right way, and make friends with my villagers and

parishioners. They are a queer lot—to be led, not driven. Above all,

you look as if you had no foolish fads or fancies—the only things I can’t

tolerate when there is so much real work to be done. And you’ll be

content to do it closely on the lines laid down for us all in the Sermon

on the Mount, before Christianity, as Christ left it, had lost its

identity among a crowd of sects and superstitions. By the way, you must

have been surprised, I imagine, that I asked no questions in my letters

as to your opinions, and gave you no hints about my own.

“The fact is,” he continued, “I care more for what a man does than for

what he thinks, and if you will look after my cottagers, soul and

body—beginning with the body first—you and I will get on well together,

no matter what opinions you hold on all the open questions of the day.

Of course I don’t use the term ‘open’ of anything plainly taught us in

the Gospel narrative and the precepts of our Church. Though even the

latter, as it seems to me, might have been conceived in a somewhat wider

spirit without being wide enough to embrace the Christianity of Christ.

And for this reason I am altogether opposed to commissions and enquiries

of any kind that might impose still further limits and restrictions where

He Himself has made none. What are wanted for the Church are active

energetic workmen, and the wider the doors are thrown open the more of

them we shall get for the work. Think what missionary effort itself

could accomplish if all its labourers were content to waive, one and all

of them, their private specifics, and preach only the clear unquestioned

truths which the Master Himself has sanctioned.

“On all questions but these you may hold what theories you will—that the

world was created in six days or in six times as many millions of years;

that the Old Testament miracles were literal facts, or allegories for the

suggestion of much-needed truths. And you may hold, if you will, that no

creature that has life will perish. We are told, are we not? that He

‘will save both man and beast,’ which means, if its means anything, that

other creatures besides man will have a portion in the future state.

“But think well and carefully before you teach an Eternity of Punishment.

The responsibility of doing so is far too grave to be carelessly incurred

in the light of a wider and clearer-sighted knowledge. Almost it seems

that the guess which Charlotte Brontë hazarded in the mouth of one of her

characters will before long have crystallized into doctrine: ‘No; I

cannot believe that. I hold another creed, which no one ever taught me,

and which I never mention, but in which I delight, and to which I cling,

for it extends hope to all; it makes eternity a rest—a mighty home, not a

terror and an abyss.’

“Above all things, do not confuse your mind and paralyse your energies

with the question, so all-engrossing now-a-days, of the co-existence of

good and evil, of joy and sorrow, in the world, which is after all no

mystery at all. Or, if there be a mystery, surely it lies in the fact

that anyone should have thought a world of infinite perfection possible.

Why, the fallacy was refuted by Plato himself, to whom it was a

self-evident truth that the creations of The Infinite must needs be

finite and imperfect: in other words, not ‘infinitely’ but only ‘very’

good.

“Limitation, imperfection and (by consequence) evil, with their natural

development in sin and suffering and death, were the inevitable portion

of created life, but accompanied (thank heaven!) with a birthright of

possibilities for good, that, rightly used here and hereafter, shall make

us worthy of association, at the last perhaps of union, with the Infinite

Itself.

“Forgive me if my sermon has wearied you. I can at any rate summarise it

in brief. Teach mainly what has come to us directly from our Master’s

lips—first and foremost, the paramount duty of unselfishness; it embodies

the whole duty of man to man, and a part at least of his duty to his

Creator. And remember that those who came after Him were after all but

men, not exempt from the bias of inclination and judgment, who sometimes

(it is quite possible) may have obscured where they thought to enlighten.

To be followed therefore with all care and caution whenever they defined

or limited what He left wide enough to embrace the world.

“Of course you will dine with me to-night,” he added cheerily, “and I’ll

try to make amends for the penance I have inflicted on you. Besides, I

want your opinion on the trout from the Rectory stream.”

The Chapel on the Hill · 第 1 / 22 章