This, [Greek: petroi stathmen harmozon], he translates,--

"Whose mind the God leads to destruction; _but that he_ (_the God_)

practises this a short time without destroying such an one."

But for the Italics it might have been an oversight: they would seem to

imply he has some authority for his translation. I have no edition of

Sophocles by me to discover, but surely no critical scholar can acquiesce

in it. The only _active_ sense of [Greek: prassein] I remember at the

moment is _to exact_. It surely should be translated, "_And he, whom the

God so leads to_ [Greek: ate], _fares_ a _very_ short time without it." The

best translation of [Greek: ate] is, perhaps, _infatuation_. Moreover, how

is the above translation reconciled with the very superlative [Greek:

oligoston]?

Notes and Queries, Number 211, November 12, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 81 / 121 题