FEEDING BOILERS AT THE BOTTOM.

One of the most important things to be considered in boiler construction

is the position and arrangement of the feed apparatus, but it is,

unfortunately, one of the elements that is most often overlooked, or, if

considered at all, only in a very superficial manner. Many seem to think

that it is only necessary to have a hole somewhere in the boiler--no

matter what part--through which water may be pumped, and we have all that

is desired. This is a very grave error. Many boilers have been ruined,

and (we make the assertion with the confidence born of long experience) a

large number of destructive explosions have been directly caused by

introducing the feed water into boilers at the wrong point.

On the location and construction of the feed depends to some extent the

economical working of a boiler, and, to a great extent, especially with

certain types of boilers, its safety, durability, and freedom from a

variety of defects, such as leaky seams, fractured plates, and others of

a similar kind. And it is unfortunately true that the type of boiler

which from its nature is most severely affected by mal-construction, such

as we are now speaking of, is the very one which is the oftenest subject

to it. We are speaking now more particularly of the plain cylinder

boiler, of which there are many in use throughout the country.

Plain cylinder boilers are, as a rule, provided with mud drums located

near the back end. As a rule, also, these boilers are set in pairs over a

single furnace, and the mud drum extends across beneath, and is connected

to both, and one end projects through the setting wall at the side. Our

illustrations show a typical arrangement of this kind. Fig. 1 shows a

transverse section of the boilers and setting, while Fig. 2 shows a

longitudinal section of the same. It is a favorite method to connect the

feed pipe, F, to the end of the mud drum which projects through the wall,

and here the feed water is introduced, whether hot or cold; and there is

really not so much difference after all between the two, for no matter

_how_ effective a heater may be, the temperature to which it can raise

water passing through is quite low compared with the temperature of the

water in the boiler due to a steam pressure of say eighty pounds per

square inch. The difference in the effect produced by feeding hot or cold

water at the wrong place is one of degree, not of kind.

When a boiler is under steam of say eighty pounds per square inch, the

body of water in it will have a temperature of about 324 degrees Fahr.,

and the shell plates will necessarily be somewhat hotter, especially on

the bottom (just _how_ much hotter will depend entirely upon the quantity

of scale or sediment present). Now introduce a large volume of cold water

through an opening in the bottom, and what becomes of it? Does it rise at

once, and become mixed with the large body of water in the boiler? By no

means. It _cannot_ rise until it has become heated, for there is a great

difference between the specific gravity of water at 60°, or even 212°

Fahr., and water at 324°. Consequently, it "hugs" the bottom of the

boiler, and flows toward the _front_ end, or hottest portion of the

shell. Now let us examine the effect which it produces.

We know that wrought iron expands or contracts about 1 part in 150,000

for each degree that its temperature is raised or lowered. This is

equivalent to a stress of _one ton_ per square inch of section for every

15 degrees. That is, suppose we fix a piece of iron, a strip of

boilerplate, for instance, ¼ of an inch thick and 4 inches wide, at a

temperature of 92 degrees Fahr., between a pair of immovable clamps.

Then, if we reduce the temperature of the bar under experiment to that of

melting ice, we put a stress of four tons upon it, or one ton for each

inch of its width.

[Illustration: FIG. 1]

Now this is precisely what happens when cold water is fed into the bottom

of a boiler. We have the plates of the shell at a temperature of not

less, probably, than 350° Fahr. A large quantity of cold water, often at

a temperature as low as 50° Fahr., is introduced through an opening in

the bottom, and flows along over these heated plates. If it could produce

its _full_ effect at once, the contraction caused thereby would bring a

stress of 300 ÷ 15 = 20 tons per square inch upon the bottom plates of

the shell. But fortunately it cannot exert its full effect at once, but

it _can_ act to such an extent that we have known it to rupture the

plates of a new boiler through the seams on the bottom _no less than

three times in less than six weeks_ after the boilers were started up.

The effect in such cases will always be the most marked, especially if

the plant is furnished with a heater, when the engine is not running, for

then, as no steam is being drawn from the boilers, there is comparatively

little circulation going on in the water in the boiler, and the water

pumped in, colder than usual from the fact that the heater is not in

operation, spreads out in a thin layer on the lowest point of the shell,

and _stays there_, and keeps the temperature of the shell down, owing to

the fires being banked or the draught shut, while the larger body of

water above, at a temperature of from 300 to 325 degrees, keeps the upper

portion of the shell at _its_ higher temperature. It will readily be seen

that the strain brought upon the seams along the bottom is something

enormous, and we can understand why it is that many boilers of this class

rupture their girth seams while being filled up for the night after the

engine has been shut down. To most persons who have but a slight

knowledge of the matter, we fancy it would be a surprise to see the

persistence with which cold water will "hug" the bottom of a boiler under

such circumstances. We have seen boilers when the fire has been drawn,

and cold water pumped in to cool them off, so cold on the bottom that

they felt cold to the touch, and must consequently have had a temperature

considerably below 100° Fahr., while the water on top, above the tubes,

was sufficiently hot to scald; and they will remain in such a condition

for hours.

[Illustration: FIG. 2.]

The only thing to be done, where feed connections are made in the manner

described, is to change them, and by changing them at once much trouble,

or even a disastrous explosion, may be avoided. Put the feedpipe in

through the front head, at the point marked _p_ in Fig. 1, drill and tap

a hole the proper size for the feed pipe, cut a long thread on the end of

the pipe, and screw the pipe through the head, letting it project through

on the inside far enough to put on a coupling, then screw into the

coupling a piece of pipe not less than eight or ten feet long, letting it

run horizontally toward the back end of the boiler, the whole arrangement

being only from 3 to 4 inches below the water line of the boiler, and hot

or cold water may be fed indifferently, without fear of danger from

ruptured plates or leaky seams. In short, put in a "top feed," and avoid

further trouble.--_The Locomotive_.

* * * * *

[MICROSCOPICAL JOURNAL.]

Scientific American Supplement, No. 483, April 4, 1885 · 第 21 / 55 题