GREECE AND THE LEAGUE

King George himself was a ruler of large experience, of great

practical wisdom, and of fine diplomatic skill. He had shortly

before selected as prime minister the former Cretan insurgent, Mr.

Eleutherios Venizelos. It is significant that the new premier had

also taken the War portfolio. He foresaw the impending conflict--as

every wise statesman in Europe had foreseen it--and began to make

preparations for it. For the reorganization of the army and navy he

secured French and English experts, the former headed by General

Eydoux, the latter by Admiral Tufnel. By 1914 it was estimated that

the military and naval forces of the country would be thoroughly

trained and equipped, and war was not expected before that date. But

now in 1912 the hand of the Greek government was forced. And a

decision one way or the other was inevitable.

Mr. Venizelos had already proved himself an agitator, an orator, and

a politician. He was now to reveal himself not only to Greece but to

Europe as a wise statesman and an effective leader of his people.

The first test came in his answer to the invitation to join Bulgaria

and Servia within three days in a war against Turkey. Of all

possibilities open to him Mr. Venizelos rejected the programme of

continued isolation for Greece. There were those who glorified it as

splendid and majestic: to him under the existing circumstances it

seemed stupid in itself and certain to prove disastrous in its

results. Greece alone would never have been able to wage a war

against Turkey. And if Greece declined to participate in the

inevitable conflict, which the action of the two Slav states had

only hastened, then whether they won or Turkey won, Greece was bound

to lose. It was improbable that the Ottoman power should come out of

the contest victorious; but, if the unexpected happened, what would

be the position, not only of the millions of Greeks in the Turkish

Empire, but of the little kingdom of Greece itself on whose northern

boundary the insolent Moslem oppressor, flushed with his triumph

over Bulgaria, Servia, and Montenegro, would be immovably

entrenched? On the other hand if these Christian states themselves

should succeed, as seemed likely, in destroying the Ottoman Empire

in Europe, the Kingdom of Greece, if she now remained a passive

spectator of their struggles, would find in the end that Macedonia

had come into the possession of the victorious Slavs, and the Great

Idea of the Greeks--the idea of expansion into Hellenic lands

eastward toward Constantinople--exploded as an empty bubble. It was

Mr. Venizelos's conclusion that Greece could not avoid participating

in the struggle. Neutrality would have entailed the complete

bankruptcy of Hellenism in the Orient. There remained only the

alternative of co-operation--co-operation with Turkey or

co-operation with the Christian states of the Balkans.

The Balkan Wars: 1912-1913 Third Edition · 第 21 / 56 题