GREEK ECCLESIASTICAL DOMINATION OF SLAV

I refer to the special and exceptional position held by the Greeks

in the Turkish dominions. Though the Moslems had possessed themselves

of the Greek Empire from the Bosphorus to the Danube, Greek

domination still survived as an intellectual, ecclesiastical, and

commercial force. The nature and effects of that supremacy, and its

results upon the fortunes of other Balkan nations, we must now

proceed to consider.

The Turkish government classifies its subjects not on the basis of

nationality but on the basis of religion. A homogeneous religious

group is designated a millet or nation. Thus the Moslems form the

millet of Islam. And at the present time there are among others a

Greek millet, a Catholic millet, and a Jewish millet. But from the

first days of the Ottoman conquest until very recent times all the

Christian population, irrespective of denominational differences,

was assigned by the Sultans to the Greek millet, of which the

patriarch of Constantinople was the head. The members of this

millet were all called Greeks; the bishops and higher clergy were

exclusively Greek; and the language of their churches and schools

was Greek, which was also the language of literature, commerce, and

polite society. But the jurisdiction of the patriarch was not

restricted even to ecclesiastical and educational matters. It

extended to a considerable part of civil law--notably to questions

of marriage, divorce, and inheritance when they concerned Christians

only.

It is obvious that the possession by the Greek patriarch of

Constantinople of this enormous power over the Christian subjects of

the Turks enabled him to carry on a propaganda of hellenization.

The disappearance for three centuries of the national consciousness

in Servia and Bulgaria was not the sole work of the Moslem invader;

a more fatal blight to the national languages and culture were the

Greek bishops and clergy who conducted their churches and schools.

And if Kinglake knew nothing of Bulgaria as late as 1834 it was

because every educated person in that country called himself a

Greek. For it cannot be too strongly emphasized that until

comparatively recent times all Christians of whatever nation or sect

were officially recognized by the Turks as members of the Greek

millet and were therefore designated Greeks.

The hostility of the Slavonic peoples in the Balkans, and especially

of the Bulgarians, to the Greeks, grows out of the ecclesiastical

and educational domination which the Greek clergy and bishops so

long and so relentlessly exercised over them. Of course the Turkish

Sultans are responsible for the arrangement. But there is no

evidence that they had any other intention than to rid themselves of

a disagreeable task. For the rest they regarded Greeks and Slavs

with equal contempt. But the Greeks quickly recognized the racial

advantage of their ecclesiastical hegemony. And it was not in human

nature to give it up without a struggle. The patriarchate retained

its exclusive jurisdiction over all orthodox populations till 1870,

when the Sultan issued a firman establishing the Bulgarian

exarchate.

There were two other spheres in which Greek influence was paramount

in the Turkish Empire. The Turk is a soldier and farmer; the Greek

is pre-eminent as a trader, and his ability secured him a

disproportionate share of the trade of the empire. Again, the Greeks

of Constantinople and other large cities gradually won the

confidence of the Turks and attained political importance. During

the eighteenth century the highest officials in the empire were

invariably Phanariots, as the Constantinople Greeks were termed from

the quarter of the city in which they resided.

In speaking of the Greeks I have not had in mind the inhabitants of

the present kingdom of Greece. Their subjection by the Turks was as

complete as that of the Serbs and Bulgaria though of course they

were exempt from ecclesiastical domination at the hands of an alien

clergy speaking a foreign language. The enmity of the Bulgarians may

to-day be visited upon the subjects of King Constantine, but it was

not their ancestors who imposed upon Bulgaria foreign schools and

churches but the Greeks of Constantinople and Thrace, over whom the

government of Athens has never had jurisdiction.

The Balkan Wars: 1912-1913 Third Edition · 第 14 / 56 题