THE TURKISH EMPIRE IN EUROPE

A little clan of oriental shepherds, the Turks had in two

generations gained possession of the whole of the northwest corner

of Asia Minor and established themselves on the eastern shore of the

Bosphorus. The great city of Brusa, whose groves to-day enshrine the

stately beauty of their mosques and sultans' tombs, capitulated to

Orkhan, the son of the first Sultan, in 1326; and Nicaea, the cradle

of the Greek church and temporary capital of the Greek Empire,

surrendered in 1330. On the other side of the Bosphorus Orkhan could

see the domes and palaces of Constantinople which, however, for

another century was to remain the seat of the Byzantine Empire.

The Turks crossed the Hellespont and, favored by an earthquake,

marched in 1358 over the fallen walls and fortifications into the

city of Gallipoli. In 1361 Adrianople succumbed to the attacks of

Orkhan's son, Murad I, whose sway was soon acknowledged in Thrace

and Macedonia, and who was destined to lead the victorious Ottoman

armies as far north as the Danube.

But though the provinces of the corrupt and effete Byzantine Empire

were falling into the hands of the Turks, the Slavs were still

unsubdued. Lazar the Serb threw down the gauntlet to Murad. On the

memorable field of Kossovo, in 1389, the opposing forces met--Murad

supported by his Asiatic and European vassals and allies, and Lazar

with his formidable army of Serbs, Bosnians, Albanians, Poles,

Magyars, and Vlachs. Few battles in the world have produced such a

deep and lasting impression as this battle of Kossovo, in which the

Christian nations after long and stubborn resistance were vanquished

by the Moslems. The Servians still sing ballads which cast a halo of

pathetic romance round their great disaster. And after more than

five centuries the Montenegrins continue to wear black on their caps

in mourning for that fatal day.

In the next two centuries the Ottoman Empire moved on toward the

zenith of its glory. Mohammed II conquered Constantinople in 1453.

And in 1529 Suleyman the Magnificent was at the gates of Vienna.

Suleyman's reign forms the climax of Turkish history. The Turks had

become a central European power occupying Hungary and menacing

Austria. Suleyman's dominions extended from Mecca to Buda-Pesth and

from Bagdad to Algiers. He commanded the Mediterranean, the

Euxine, and the Red Sea, and his navies threatened the coasts of

India and Spain.

But the conquests of the Turks were purely military. They did

nothing for their subjects, whom they treated with contempt, and

they wanted nothing from them but tribute and plunder. As the Turks

were always numerically inferior to the aggregate number of the

peoples under their sway, their one standing policy was to keep them

divided--divide et impera. To fan racial and religious differences

among their subjects was to perpetuate the rule of the masters. The

whole task of government, as the Turks conceived it, was to collect

tribute from the conquered and keep them in subjection by playing

off their differences against one another.

But a deterioration of Turkish rulers set in soon after the time of

Suleyman with a corresponding decline in the character and

efficiency of the army. And the growth of Russia and the reassertion

of Hungary, Poland, and Austria were fatal to the maintenance of an

alien and detested empire founded on military domination alone. By

the end of the seventeenth century the Turks had been driven out of

Austria, Hungary, Transylvania, and Podolia, and the northern

boundaries of their Empire were fixed by the Carpathians, the

Danube, and the Save. How marked and rapid was the further decline

of the Ottoman Empire may be inferred from the fact that twice in

the eighteenth century Austria and Russia discussed the project of

dividing it between them. But the inevitable disintegration of the

Turkish dominion was not to inure to the glorification of any of the

Great Powers, though Russia certainly contributed to the weakening

of the common enemy. The decline and diminution of the Ottoman

Empire continued throughout the nineteenth century. What happened,

however, was the revolt of subject provinces and the creation out of

the territory of European Turkey of the independent states of

Greece, Servia, Roumania, and Bulgaria. And it was Bulgarians,

Greeks, and Servians, with the active assistance of the Montenegrins

and the benevolent neutrality of the Roumanians, who, in the war of

1912-1913, drove the Turk out of Europe, leaving him nothing but the

city of Constantinople and a territorial fringe bordered by the

Chataldja line of fortifications.

The Balkan Wars: 1912-1913 Third Edition · 第 11 / 56 题