11. OMENS AND FANTASIES

Men seem to have always taken an interest in meteorites, but not until

the early nineteenth century were these objects considered to be worth

preserving for _scientific_ study.

In the beginning, people believed that because meteorites fell from the

heavens, they were either gods themselves or messengers from the gods.

The more civilized of early men therefore carefully kept the fallen

meteorites. They draped them in costly linens and anointed them with

oil. In many instances, the people built special temples in which

meteorites were actually worshipped. Some of the holy stones of the

ancients, such as the Diana of the Ephesians, mentioned in the Bible as

“the image which fell down from Jupiter,”[9] are now thought to have

been meteorites.

Meteorite worship was common long ago in the Mediterranean area and in

Africa, India, Japan, and Mexico. This practice still persists in some

regions even in modern times. The Black Stone of the Kaaba, for example,

has been sacred to all Mohammedans from about 700 A.D. right up to the

present. It is said to be a meteorite although this fact has never been

verified, because strict religious taboos connected with the stone

prevent any scientific examination or study of it. On the contrary, the

Andhâra, India, meteorite is known to be a genuine one. The story of the

fall and preservation of this meteorite provides a fairly modern example

of practices rooted in the ritual and custom of far more ancient times.

At about 4:00 in the afternoon of December 2, 1880, the people of

Andhâra heard a noise like that made by a gun. Some of the villagers saw

a “dark ball” come to earth in a field near them. This falling object

sent up a small cloud of dust as it struck the ground. After the stone

had been recovered from the field and the dust had been washed from its

surface, two Brahmin priests took charge of it and began to collect

money for the erection of a temple in which the holy object could be

properly displayed.

The scientist who promptly investigated the Andhâra fall reported that

throngs of worshippers were crowding into the as yet unfinished brick

temple to make offerings of flowers, sweetmeats, milk, rice, water, bel

leaves, and of course money. The stone had been named Adbhuta-Nâth, “the

miraculous god.” It was shaped like a round loaf of blackish bread and

weighed an estimated 6 pounds. The scientist was not allowed to touch

it, but he got close enough to verify that the stone was a meteorite

covered with a typical blackish fusion crust.

Not only has man worshipped meteorites, but during a period extending

from approximately 300 B.C. to 300 A.D., emperors and self-governing

cities frequently marked the fall of meteorites by minting special coins

or medals known as _betyls_.[10] One of these is the betyl of Emisa,

Syria, made by Antonius Pius (138-161 A.D.). The historian, Herodotus,

accurately described the object honored by this betyl as: “A large

stone, which on the lower side is round, and above runs gradually to a

point. It has nearly the form of a cone, and is of a black color.

_People say of it in earnest that it fell from Heaven._” The stone is

shown on the coin as carried on a quadriga (a carriage drawn by four

horses) under a canopy of four sunshades.

[Illustration: COURTESY OF AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Drawing of multiple fireball, over Athens, October 18, 1863. J. F.

J. Schmidt, the celebrated pioneer fireball observer, described it

as a mass of dazzling light “bringing into view land and sea, with

the Acropolis and the Parthenon a mile away across the city.”]

Many ancient peoples held meteorites in great reverence, particularly if

they were seen to fall. But at the same time, other more

practical-minded individuals made good use of the durable and easily

worked alloy provided by nature in the nickel-iron meteorites. This

alloy was frequently used to make ax-heads, spear and harpoon points,

knives, farming tools, stirrups and spurs, and even pots and other

utensils. Archeologists have found earrings and similar ornaments

overlaid with thin sheets of hammered meteoritic iron in Indian mounds

of the Ohio Valley. They have also discovered round beads made of

nickel-iron in Indian mounds of the Havana, Illinois, area and in the

still more ancient Egyptian ruins at Gerzah.

Meteoritic iron has often been used in the manufacture of special

swords, daggers, and knives for members of the royalty. Atilla and other

early conquerors of Europe boasted of “swords from heaven.” Emperor

Jehangir (1605-1627) ordered two sword blades, a knife, and a dagger to

be smelted from the Jalandhar, India, meteorite, which fell on April 10,

1621. In the early nineteenth century, a sword was manufactured from a

portion of the Cape of Good Hope meteorite for presentation to

Alexander, the Emperor of Russia. Even as late as the end of the

nineteenth century, several swords were made from a part of the

Shirihagi, Japan, iron meteorite at the command of a member of the

Japanese court.

[Illustration: A Russian artist’s pen-and-ink drawing of an

extremely brilliant detonating fire ball or bolide. See page 102.]

In the Europe of the Middle Ages, meteorite falls and meteor showers, as

well as other “unnatural” events like comets, eclipses, and displays of

the aurora borealis, were regarded with superstitious awe by commoner

and king alike. The medieval mind always sought to interpret events

connected in any way with the heavens as somehow influencing the affairs

of men. A bishop explained that the great meteor shower of April 4,

1095, forecast “the changes and wanderings of nations from kingdom to

kingdom.” The fact, however, that the First Crusade began within a year,

is mere coincidence.

In referring to celestial events, Shakespeare often expressed the view

that was common in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. An example is:

The bay-trees in our country are all wither’d

And meteors fright the fixed stars of heaven;

The pale-faced moon looks bloody on the earth

And lean-look’d prophets whisper fearful change,

. . . . . .

These signs forerun the death or fall of kings.

(_Richard II_, II, iv, 8-11, 15)

Yet the descent of meteorites from the heavens was not always regarded

as a forewarning of bad fortune. On November 16, 1492, a 279-pound

meteorite fell at Ensisheim in Alsace, not far from the battle line

separating the armies of France and the Holy Roman Empire. Emperor

Maximilian, the leader of the Empire’s forces, commanded that the fallen

stone be carried to his castle. There a formal war-council was held to

determine what the strange event could mean.

[Illustration: COURTESY OF AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY

Drawing of Andromedid meteor shower, November 27, 1872.]

The Emperor and his councillors decided that the fall of the meteorite

at such a time and place was an omen of divine favor which meant good

fortune to the cause of the Holy Roman Empire. After breaking off two

small pieces of the stone, one for the Duke of Austria and one for

himself, the Emperor forbade further damage to it. He also gave orders

that the stone be hung in the parish church in Ensisheim for all to see.

In this way, the Ensisheim stone became the very first meteorite of

witnessed fall to be preserved down to the present day—and all because

of the superstition of a famous military leader.

The discussion to this point makes clear that in ancient, medieval, and

Renaissance times, meteorite falls were considered as startling and

disturbing events, which frequently were interpreted in strange and

mistaken ways. But the fact that meteorites actually did fall from the

heavens was not questioned. As the so-called “Age of Reason” opened, a

curious change in attitude toward meteorite falls took place.

At the very time that knowledge in general increased, men of learning

began to deny that meteorite falls occurred at all! The scientists of

the French Academy, in particular, were very positive on this point.

Since the era was one in which all Europe sneezed if “la belle France”

had a cold in the head, it was a trying time not only for the early

meteoriticists, but for all who had the nerve to insist they had seen

rocks fall from the sky.

By the end of the 1700’s, the authorities had studied the evidence

relating to meteorite falls and had completely rejected it. They said

that there was no “proof” whatever that “stones fell from the heavens.”

These early scientists openly sneered at people who claimed that they

had seen meteorites fall. It was felt that the spectators of such events

either had merely been “seeing things,” or had surely been reporting

light and sound effects connected with nothing but ordinary

thunderstorms.

When confronted with the “fallen” masses themselves, the authorities

often refused to examine them, or if they did, insisted that these

masses were only rocks that had been struck by lightning. Such were the

opinions of learned men around the close of the eighteenth century.

Fortunately, scientific facts have a stubborn way of winning out in the

long run. A major part of the credit for seeing that the truth regarding

meteorite falls was at last recognized must go to E. F. F. Chladni, a

German physicist, and to Edward Howard, an English chemist.

In 1794, Chladni published an extremely important paper concerning a

large spongelike mass of “native iron” found near Krasnoyarsk, Russia.

This object had been discovered in 1749 by a Russian blacksmith, and it

was studied in 1772 by P. S. Pallas, an early traveler. Chladni

concluded that the mass of iron[11] must have fallen from the heavens,

because it had been “fused” (but not by man, electricity, or fire) and

also because there were no volcanoes anywhere around its place of find.

Chladni supported his theory by listing numerous reports of meteorite

falls dating from ancient and medieval times. But Chladni’s fellow

scientists flatly rejected his theory as clever but not satisfactory.

With the fall of the Siena meteorites in Italy on June 16, 1794, the

controversy regarding the possibility that stones actually fell from the

sky became particularly heated, and remained so for nearly ten years.

During this interval, two other important meteorite falls occurred: Wold

Cottage, England, on December 13, 1795, and Benares, India, on December

19, 1798. Scientists had a hard time finding explanations for these

well-observed events, and some of the theories put forward to account

for them far outdid Chladni’s in “cleverness,” if that be the correct

word.

One scholar, writing in 1796, suggested that the masses which fell at

Siena resulted from the solidification at great height of volcanic ashes

from Mount Vesuvius. These ashes had supposedly been carried northward

beyond Siena and then been “brought back by a northerly wind, congealing

from the air....”

Fortunately, in 1803 Edward Howard’s chemical work on meteorites came to

a successful conclusion. This patient chemist made analyses of samples

from the Siena, Wold Cottage, and Benares falls and from an older

Bohemian fall. He also had the samples studied mineralogically by a

fellow scientist. From the results of these investigations, he drew the

following conclusions, which admirably supported Chladni’s well-reasoned

and thoroughly documented theory regarding meteorite falls:

All four of the stones studied had very nearly the same composition.

Despite the fact that the stones contained no new elements, their

mineralogical character differed in several important respects from

that of any rocks found naturally on the earth.

The four masses must have had a common origin although their reported

falls had been widely separated both in time and in space.

Finally, said Howard, it was quite possible that the stones had really

fallen from the sky.

Howard’s views were soon put to the test. Shortly after the publication

of his important paper, a shower of stony meteorites fell near L’Aigle,

France, on April 26, 1803. This event was carefully investigated by

French scientists, and they reluctantly admitted that about 3,000 stones

actually had fallen within an oval-shaped area about 6 miles long by 2

miles wide. This shower of meteorites had been accompanied by the same

light and sound effects mentioned in many of the old meteorite-fall

reports collected by Chladni, effects now recognized as characteristic

of the infall of meteorites upon the earth. The evidence was

overwhelming—stones really did fall from the sky. In the camp of the

enemy, so to speak, the reality of meteorite falls was established once

and for all!

Space Nomads: Meteorites in Sky, Field, and Laboratory · 第 17 / 28 题