OBSTETRIC SEPSIS AND ANTISEPSIS.

Auvard, writing to the Annals of Gynec., April, 1888, says, while before

the days of antiseptics it was better for a woman to be delivered in the

street than in a hospital, the hospital ward is now less dangerous than

the isolated lying-in chamber of the out-patient obstetric service. He

points out the importance of improving the resisting power by use of

tonics before the labor, in debilitated patients. In Auvard’s practice

every woman takes a thorough bath at the beginning of labor. The whole

vulvar and vaginal surfaces and cervical canal are sterilized before

expulsion begins, before obstetric wounds are developed. Asepsis before

and during the birth is more effectual than the use of antiseptics at

the close of labor and renders the latter unnecessary.

Sublimate soap and the sublimate solution, with which this soap makes a

lather, are well rubbed into the surfaces to be cleansed by aid of the

fingers. The dangers of sublimate poisoning do not obtain while the

surfaces are intact.

In the event of septic developments during the puerperal period he

thinks sublimate irrigation insufficient for genital antisepsis. The

vulva and vagina should be scrubbed by aid of the fingers with the

sublimate soap and solution. The uterus should be scraped with the

curette. Auvard has devised for this purpose a curette with a hollow

stem through which a stream of the antiseptic solution is kept flowing

during its use. [The mercurial salts may be replaced with a 1:1000

hydronaphthol solution for use within the passages after labor, though

the danger from the former antiseptic may be greatly diminished by

washing away the mercurial with a final injection of plain boiled

water.]

The Brooklyn Medical Journal. Vol. II. No. 2. Aug., 1888 · 第 58 / 75 题