CHAPTER XIV.

SCHOOL TRIALS.

WHISTLER’S first day at school was not a day of unalloyed pleasure. It

was not without a severe struggle with his feelings that he met his

comrades and teachers, and took the familiar seat he had so long

occupied. The exciting scenes of the exhibition day, a few weeks

previous, came up vividly in his mind. The general credit with which he

passed through the examination, the applause with which his declamation

was received, and the praise bestowed upon several drawings and maps

executed by his hand, certainly were not of themselves unpleasant

recollections. But these happy memories were all embittered by another

thought, which he could not drive from his mind. He had left the school,

at the close of the last term, expecting to return to it no more. He had

presented himself as a candidate for admission to a school of higher

grade, and, to his great surprise and mortification, had been found

lacking in some of the necessary qualifications.

This was the severest blow Whistler ever received. He went home and gave

himself up to his grief. His vacation was blasted, his visit to

Brookdale was spoilt, and, indeed, it almost seemed to him as if his

prospects for life were ruined. His mother tried to comfort him, but

without much success. When his father came home, at night, he was

informed of the result of Whistler’s application by Mrs. Davenport. The

tea-bell rang, but Whistler did not appear. The servant was then sent to

his room to call him, and brought back the reply that he did not want

any supper. After tea, Mr. Davenport went up to his chamber, and found

him lying upon the bed, with his face buried in a pillow.

“Hallo! what does this mean, Whistler? What’s the matter with you?” he

inquired.

There was no reply, but a sob.

“Come, speak up!—what ails you?”

“I—couldn’t get into the—High School,” sobbed the poor boy.

“Couldn’t get into the High School? How happened that? Some partiality

or trickery, I suppose; they gave you all the hard questions, and the

others the easy ones,—didn’t they?”

“No, sir,” replied Whistler, somewhat reluctantly; “the questions were

printed, and all the candidates had to answer the whole of them in

writing.”

“Ah, that’s the way they manage, is it? Not much chance for foul play

there, I should say. Then it seems you couldn’t answer the questions.”

“No, sir,—not all of them.”

“Well, whose fault was that?”

“Mine, I suppose;” and the tears started fresh from Whistler’s eyes.

“I don’t know about that; perhaps no one was to blame for this failure.

I have had some doubts, all along, about your success; but I thought it

best not to trouble you with them, as I supposed you studied as hard as

you ought to. Was I right in my supposition?”

“I believe I’ve done the best I could,” replied Whistler.

“If you can say that with a good conscience,” continued his father,

“then I’m sure I shan’t blame you, and you ought not to blame yourself;

and I think you _can_ say it, for it agrees with what your teacher told

me. Come, cheer up! and don’t think any more about it. It will all come

out right, by-and-by. You’ll be admitted next year, and you’ll be able

to keep up with your class better than though you entered now.”

These words of encouragement somewhat revived Whistler’s feelings, and

as nothing more was said in his presence about the matter, by his

parents, the tide of disappointment and mortification soon began to

subside. His sensitive mind, however, was not wholly relieved, and,

intimate as he shortly after became with Clinton, he could not impart to

his cousin this unhappy secret. Immediately on his return from his

vacation, in accordance with a plan he had formed, he asked his father’s

permission to enter a private school, instead of returning to the old

one; but the reasons he gave were not deemed satisfactory, and the

request was not granted. He accordingly reëntered the public school,

and, to his great relief, none of his mates laughed at him for coming

back, or even alluded to his unsuccessful attempt to get into more

select, if not better company. But he was very glad when the first day

of the term was over.

Whistler was a diligent scholar; but, although by no means a dull boy,

he did not learn his lessons without much hard labor. Some branches he

acquired more easily than others. He had a taste for drawing, and copied

maps and even pictures very neatly. He was also a good reader, and in

declamation and composition he stood among the best in his class. But in

some other branches, particularly spelling and arithmetic, he was rather

backward. Nevertheless, he was an industrious scholar, and made fair

progress in his studies.

But Whistler was not destined to get through the first day of the new

term without some unpleasant experiences. It so happened that in his

first recitation, which took place in the afternoon, he “missed” two

questions that were put to him. He felt vexed and mortified, and, at his

second failure, he could not keep the tears from coming into his eyes.

The teacher, as he recorded the demerits, noticed his pupil’s emotion,

but made no remark. He afterwards requested Whistler to step to his

desk, when school was dismissed.

When the school closed for the day, Whistler proceeded to the place

appointed, but not without some unpleasant apprehensions, arising from

the imperfect lesson referred to. His fears were dispelled, however,

when the teacher, pointing him to a seat, remarked very pleasantly:

“William, you are a pretty good draughtsman, and I’ve been thinking that

perhaps I could get you to do a small job for me.”

“I should be happy to,” replied Whistler.

“Do you suppose,” continued the teacher, taking a couple of pictures

from his desk, “that you could make a large copy, in outline, of each of

these figures?”

Whistler looked at the engravings a moment, and replied, with some

hesitation:

“I could copy them better on the same scale they are there.”

“I know you could,” continued the teacher; “but that will not answer my

purpose. I want them to illustrate some remarks I wish to make to the

school, and they must be large enough to be seen across the school-room.

I have no time, just now, to copy them myself, and it occurred to me

that perhaps you would like to try your hand at it. You will find it

somewhat difficult, I suppose; but it will be a good exercise for you,

even if you should not succeed very well.”

Whistler readily consented to undertake the job, and his teacher

furnished him with some large sheets of drawing paper, and gave him such

directions in regard to the work as he deemed necessary.

Whistler now hurried home, where he found Clinton, who was so exhausted

by his forenoon’s tramp that he was glad to remain in the house the rest

of the day. With his characteristic dread of idleness, however, he was

busy at work with his pocket-knife, whittling out a puzzle for Ettie. It

was nearly completed. It consisted of a thin piece of wood, in which

three holes were cut,—one square, one round, and one triangular. The

holes were all of the same height and width. The puzzle consisted in

shaping a piece of wood so that it would stop up either of these holes.

To do this, he first made a square block,—a perfect cube. This, of

course, stopped up the square hole. He next rounded this into a

cylinder, so that it just fitted the circular hole, while by turning it

the right way, it would still answer to fill up the square one. He now

sharpened one end of this cylinder, until he had made a perfect

triangle, or wedge. This fitted snugly into the remaining hole, while

enough of the original form of the block remained to fill the other two

holes.

As soon as the puzzle was finished, Whistler went up to his chamber, and

began one of the drawings he had engaged to make. His cousin watched his

operations with interest, but was unable to render him any assistance.

Indeed, this hardly seemed necessary, for the swelling outline grew

quite perceptibly under Whistler’s pencil; and, although he did not get

along without a frequent recourse to the India-rubber, his success was

quite equal to his own anticipations. He had drawn maps on both an

enlarged and a reduced scale from the original, but he had never before

attempted to do either with the human figure, which is far more

difficult. He determined to try hard for success, however; and the

somewhat doubtful manner in which his teacher spoke of his ability to

execute the drawings, seemed rather to stimulate than discourage him.

This was precisely what the teacher intended to do. He knew that the

task was a difficult one, though not beyond Whistler’s ability. He knew,

moreover, that if he had told his pupil it was easy, the latter would

scarcely have believed him, and would, perhaps, have been disheartened

by the first difficulty; whereas, by taking the other course, the boy’s

ambition and spirit were more fully aroused, and he was prepared for a

strong and patient effort.

The next morning, Clinton having expressed some curiosity to see how a

Boston school was managed, he was invited by his cousin to accompany him

as a visitor, and he concluded to do so. Reaching the schoolhouse a

little before the hour of commencement, they stood in the yard, watching

the movements of the merry groups around them, when a large, ill-favored

boy cried out:

“There comes that big dunce that’s down in the fourth class! Let’s poke

some fun at him, boys. What’s his name?—does any body know? No matter,

we’ll call him Donkey,—ha! ha! Let’s give him that for a nickname! Don’t

you call him anything else,—will you, boys?”

“Good!—his name shall be Donkey!” said another boy; and several others

seconded the motion, while one or two began to shout “Donkey! Hallo,

Donkey!” to the unsuspecting butt of their sport.

Whistler, perceiving how matters were tending, now stepped forward, and

said:

“Don’t you do it, boys! It’s too bad to twit a fellow for what he can’t

help. That boy has been sick all his lifetime, and couldn’t go to

school, and that’s the reason he’s in the lowest class.”

“That’s all gammon!” retorted the boy who proposed the nickname, and

whose name was Nathan Clapp. “Bill Davenport has a natural sympathy for

dunces,—he doesn’t want much of being one himself. You know he tried to

get into the High School, the other day, and they wouldn’t take him, and

he had to come back here again. Let him stick up for Donkey, if he wants

to; it’s natural for him to stand up for his own breed!”

“If I’m a dunce, I should like to know what you are?” exclaimed

Whistler, his eye flashing with anger.

“I wasn’t such a big fool as to try to get into the High School, at any

rate!” replied Nathan.

“Don’t say anything more to him,—he isn’t worth noticing,” whispered

Clinton in the ear of his cousin; and the latter wisely heeded the

advice, and suppressed the angry retort which was trembling upon his

lips.

“Can’t say anything more, can you? Well, I think you had better shut

up!” continued the other boy; and then, turning to the lad in whose

behalf Whistler had interfered, and who had now entered the yard, he

continued, “Hallo, Donkey! how d’ ye do? Got your lesson, hey? Let’s

hear you say your a, b, c’s. There, Donkey,”—snatching the book from

under his arm, and pointing to a line,—“what letter’s that? Don’t you

know, hey? Can’t you speak, you dunce? Come, talk up like a little man!

nobody will hurt you. What’s that letter, hey?”

The boy, who was a peaceable and good-natured fellow, was evidently

annoyed by his tormentor; but he tried to take his jeers in good part,

and joined—not very heartily, it is true—in the laugh that was raised at

his expense. Nathan continued to hector him in this way for some

minutes, when Whistler, unable longer to repress his indignation, cried

out:

“Don’t mind what he says, David; I’ll warrant you will rank ahead of him

in less than six months.”

“You say that again, and I’ll rap you over the head!” exclaimed Nathan,

drawing himself up in a menacing attitude before Whistler.

“There’s no need of saying it again; but I’ll stick to it,” replied

Whistler, with firmness.

“Yes, you’d better back out! I knew you daresn’t say it again!”

continued the young bully.

“If you call that a back-out, you’re welcome to all the comfort you can

get out of it,” calmly replied Whistler.

“If you want to fight, then, come out here!” said Nathan, doubling up

his fists.

“No, I thank you,” replied Whistler; “I don’t believe in fighting.”

A boy here whispered to Nathan that the principal was in the

schoolhouse, and might overhear him. His voice, which had been loud and

defiant, was suddenly modulated to a very low tone, as he added:

“You’re a mean, sneaking coward! I’ll leave it to all of the boys if you

aren’t.”

This sudden transition from the loud tone of bravado to that of absolute

cowardice, was so ludicrous, that there was a general outburst of

laughter among the boys, in which Whistler himself heartily joined. They

began to challenge each other, in whispers, and declared that they were

not afraid of any body, in the softest tones. Nathan quickly disappeared

around the corner of the building, but the merriment went on until the

signal was given for school to commence.

Clinton went in with his cousin, and remained through the forenoon, an

interested spectator of the proceedings. The boys first assembled in a

large hall, where a chapter was read from the Bible, and the Lord’s

Prayer repeated by the whole school. The several divisions then went to

their own rooms, each with its own teachers, and remained in separate

session, with the exception of the recess, until it was nearly time for

the school to be dismissed. All the pupils were then assembled in the

large hall, and, after singing two or three verses of a hymn, the

principal observed that he wished to say a few words before they

separated. He then proceeded, somewhat in the following strain:

“I once knew a boy who was afflicted with a very painful disease, almost

from his infancy. For years he was confined to his bed, and it was

supposed that he would never be able to run about like other boys. He

had no father, and his mother was poor, and unable to provide him with

many of those little comforts that might have made his lot more

tolerable. He had a thirst for knowledge, but could not go to school,

and, indeed, he could not apply himself to books for any length of time,

his eyes were so weak. Still he managed to learn to read, and was quite

patient under his sufferings.

“When this boy got to be twelve or thirteen years old, his health

improved so much that he was able to walk about. The first desire he

expressed was to go to school; and as soon as he was well enough, he was

permitted to attend one of the public schools. As he had enjoyed few

opportunities of learning, the teacher was obliged to place him in a

class of smaller children than himself; but, for all that, he was as

intelligent a boy, and as promising a scholar, as you could find in the

school, all things considered. But he had not been in the school two

days, before one of the large boys, who was not a remarkably good

scholar himself began to make him the butt of his ridicule, calling him

a ‘dunce’ and a ‘donkey,’ and tried to set the other boys upon him.”

At this abrupt pause, most of the scholars looked earnestly, as if

impatient for the conclusion of the story; but a few, who recognized the

characters introduced, turned their faces towards David and Nathan.

After a moment’s delay, the teacher resumed his narrative:

“There was another boy in that school, who, though he did not learn his

lessons so easily as some children, was nevertheless a diligent and

faithful scholar, and behind none of his comrades in intelligence. This

boy gallantly interfered in behalf of the new pupil; whereupon the large

boy fell upon him, and began to ridicule him because he had been an

unsuccessful candidate for another school.”

The teacher again paused, and those of the boys who were not in the

secret began to wonder at the pointless conclusion of a story that

opened so promisingly. He soon continued:

“I’m not going to call any names,—I shan’t say, as David said to Nathan

of old, ‘Thou art the man!’ but—”

“It was Nathan who said that to David,” interrupted one of the older

boys.

“I believe you are right,” continued the teacher, who possibly had not

blundered without a purpose; “but, as I was saying, I shall call no

names. I will merely say that those three boys are members of this

school, and that I have related only what actually happened. And now, I

want to put two or three questions to the school, and I wish every boy

to answer yes or no. Those of you who think it is fair and honorable to

ridicule a boy for his low standing in school, when he has been sick all

his days, and had no opportunity to learn, will please to say ‘Aye.’”

There was no response.

“Those,” continued the teacher, “who think it is mean and dishonorable

to do so, will please to say ‘Aye.’”

There was a prompt and universal shout of “Aye!”

“Now, those who think it is fair and honorable to ridicule a boy, who

studies hard and makes good progress, because he happened to make a

failure once in his life, may say ‘Aye.’”

All were silent.

“Those who think it base and mean to do so, will please to say ‘Aye.’”

Again there was a prompt and hearty “Aye!”

“Yes, I think there can be but one side to that question,” continued the

teacher. “A boy who has had no opportunity to study, ought not to be

blamed for his ignorance; and one who studies diligently, should not be

laughed at if he does not happen to know everything. These are not

dunces. The real dunce is the scholar who has the ability and the

opportunity to learn, but who will not exercise the one or improve the

other, and so remains ignorant. I can’t blame you much for laughing at

such a boy. He deserves it.

“On the other hand, I do not consider that boy the most promising who

learns his lessons in the shortest time. Some of you have only to read

over a lesson a few times, and you are ready for recitation; while

others are obliged to work hard over it for an hour or more before they

can master it. Now, if some one should come in here, and ask me to point

out the six most promising scholars among you, I do not know that I

should select one of those lads who commit their lessons to memory with

so little effort; but I _do_ know that the boy who was laughed at

because he failed to get into the High School would be among the six,

and the others would be boys who, like him, appear to appreciate the

value of knowledge, and make a diligent use of their school privileges.

“I will close,” continued the principal, “by reading to you a few facts

from a magazine I have in my desk, which go to show that some of the

most eminent men of all ages were remarkable only for dulness in their

youth. Rev. Dr. Channing, at one period of his youth, says the writer,

was considered a dull, plodding character. At nine years of age, one who

afterwards became a chief justice in this country, was, during a whole

winter, unable to commit to memory the little poem found in one of our

school books, commencing,

“‘You’d scarce expect one of my age,’ &c.

Dr. Scott, the commentator, could not compose a theme when twelve years

old; and even at a later age, Dr. Clark, after incredible effort, failed

to commit to memory a poem of a few stanzas only. Wellington, at the

military school, was not brilliant. The teachers of Linnæus thought he

was fit for nothing but a common mechanic. Sir Isaac Newton ranked very

low in school until the age of twelve. When Samuel Wythe, the Dublin

schoolmaster, attempted to educate Richard Brinsley Sheridan, he

pronounced the boy an ‘incorrigible dunce.’ The mother of Sheridan fully

concurred in this verdict, and declared him the most stupid of her sons.

Walter Scott had the credit of having the ‘thickest skull in the

school,’ though Dr. Blair told the teacher that many bright rays of

future glory shone through that same ‘thick skull.’ Milton and Swift

were noted for dulness in childhood. The great Isaac Barrow’s father

used to say that, if it pleased God to take from him any of his

children, he hoped it might be Isaac, as the least promising. Goldsmith

was dull in his youth, and Shakspeare, Gibbon, Davy and Dryden, do not

appear to have exhibited in their childhood even the common elements of

future success.”

The principal now dismissed the school, and the boys filed out, in

military order, at the touch of a bell

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Whistler; or, The Manly Boy · 第 14 / 18 章