SIR,

That short discourse which we lately had concerning the Clergy, continues

so fresh in your mind, that, I perceive by your last, you are more than a

little troubled to observe that Disesteem that lies upon several of those

holy men. Your good wishes for the Church, I know, are very strong and

unfeigned; and your hopes of the World receiving much more advantage and

better advice from some of the Clergy, than usually it is found by

experience to do, are neither needless nor impossible.

And as I have always been a devout admirer as well as strict observer of

your actions; so I have constantly taken a great delight to concur with

you in your very thoughts. Whereupon it is, Sir, that I have spent some

few hours upon that which was the occasion of your last letter, and the

subject of our late discourse.

And before, Sir, I enter upon telling you what are my apprehensions; I

must most heartily profess that, for my own part, I did never think,

since at all I understood the excellency and perfection of a Church, but

that Ours, now lately Restored, as formerly Established, does far outgo,

as to all Christian ends and purposes, either the pomp and bravery of

Rome herself, or the best of Free Spiritual States [_Nonconformists_].

But if so be, it be allowable (where we have so undoubtedly learned and

honourable a Clergy) to suppose that some of that sacred profession might

possibly have attained to a greater degree of esteem and usefulness to the

World: then I hope what has thus long hindered so great and desirable a

blessing to the nation, may be modestly guessed at! either without giving

any wilful offence to the present Church; or any great trouble, dear Sir,

to yourself. And, if I be not very much mistaken, whatever has

heretofore, or does at present, lessen the value of our Clergy, or render

it in any degree less serviceable to the World than might be reasonably

hoped; may be easily referred to two very plain things--the IGNORANCE of

some, and the POVERTY of others of the Clergy.

And first, as to _the IGNORANCE of some of our Clergy_.

If we would make a search to purpose, we must go as deep as the very

Beginnings of Education; and, doubtless, may lay a great part of our

misfortunes to the old-fashioned methods and discipline of Schooling

itself: upon the well ordering of which, although much of the improvement

of our Clergy cannot be denied mainly to depend: yet by reason this is so

well known to yourself, as also that there have been many of undoubted

learning and experience, that have set out their several models for this

purpose; I shall therefore only mention such Loss of Time and Abuse of

Youth as is most remarkable and mischievous, and as could not be

conveniently omitted in a Discourse of this nature, though ever so short.

And first of all, it were certainly worth the considering, Whether it be

unavoidably necessary to keep lads to 16 or 17 years of age, _in pure

slavery to a few Latin or Greek words_? or Whether it may not be more

convenient, especially if we call to mind their natural inclinations to

ease and idleness, and how hardly they are persuaded of the excellency of

the liberal Arts and Sciences (any further than the smart of the last

piece of discipline is fresh in their memories), Whether, I say, it be

not more proper and beneficial to mix with those unpleasant tasks and

drudgeries, something that, in probability, might not only take much

better with them, but might also be much easier obtained?

As, suppose some part of time was allotted them, for the reading of some

innocent English Authors! where they need not go, every line, so

unwillingly to a tormenting Dictionary, and whereby they might come in a

short time, to apprehend common sense, and to begin to judge what is

true. For you shall have lads that are arch knaves at the Nominative

Case, and that have a notable quick eye at spying out of the Verb; who,

for want of reading such common and familiar books, shall understand no

more of what is very plain and easy, than a well educated dog or horse.

Or suppose they were taught, as they might much easier be than what is

commonly offered to them, the principles of Arithmetic, Geometry, and

such alluring parts of Learning. As these things undoubtedly would be

much more useful, so much more delightful to them, than to be tormented

with a tedious story how PHAETON broke his neck, or how many nuts and

apples TITYRUS had for his supper.

For, most certainly, youths, if handsomely dealt with, are much

inclinable to emulation, and to a very useful esteem of glory; and more

especially, if it be the reward of knowledge: and therefore, if such

things were carefully and discreetly propounded to them, wherein they

might not only earnestly contend amongst themselves, but might also see

how far they outskill the rest of the World, a lad hereby would think

himself high and mighty; and would certainly take great delight in

contemning the next unlearned mortal he meets withal.

But if, instead hereof, you diet him with nothing but with Rules and

Exceptions, with tiresome repetitions of _Amo_ and [Greek: _Tupto_],

setting a day also apart also to recite _verbatim_ all the burdensome

task of the foregoing week (which I am confident is usually as dreadful

as an old Parliament Fast) we must needs believe that such a one, thus

managed, will scarce think to prove immortal, by such performances and

accomplishments as these.

You know very well, Sir, that lads in general have but a kind of ugly and

odd conception of Learning; and look upon it as such a starving thing, and

unnecessary perfection, especially as it is usually dispensed out unto

them, that Nine-pins or Span-counter are judged much more heavenly

employments! And therefore what pleasure, do we think, can such a one

take in being bound to get against breakfast, two or three hundred

Rumblers out of HOMER, in commendation of ACHILLES's toes, or the

Grecians' boots; or to have measured out to him, very early in the

morning, fifteen or twenty well laid on lashes, for letting a syllable

slip too soon, or hanging too long on it? Doubtless instant execution

upon such grand miscarriages as these, will eternally engage him to a

most admirable opinion of the Muses!

Lads, certainly, ought to be won by all possible arts and devices: and

though many have invented fine pictures and games, to cheat them into the

undertaking of unreasonable burdens; yet this, by no means, is such a

lasting temptation as the propounding of that which in itself is pleasant

and alluring. For we shall find very many, though of no excelling

quickness, will soon perceive the design of the landscape; and so,

looking through the veil, will then begin to take as little delight in

those pretty contrivances, as in getting by heart three or four leaves of

ungayed nonsense.

Neither seems the stratagem of Money to be so prevailing and catching, as

a right down offer of such books which are ingenious and convenient: there

being but very few so intolerably careful of their bellies, as to look

upon the hopes of a cake or a few apples, to be a sufficient recompense,

for cracking their pates with a heap of independent words.

I am not sensible that I have said anything in disparagement of those two

famous tongues, the Greek and Latin; there being much reason to value them

beyond others, because the best of Human Learning has been delivered unto

us in those languages. But he that worships them, purely out of honour to

Rome and Athens, having little or no respect to the usefulness and

excellency of the books themselves, as many do: it is a sign he has a

great esteem and reverence of antiquity; but I think him, by no means

comparable, for happiness, to him who catches frogs or hunts butterflies.

That some languages therefore ought to be studied is in a manner

absolutely necessary: unless all were brought to one; which would be the

happiest thing that the World could wish for!

But whether the beginning of them might not be more insensibly instilled,

and more advantageously obtained by reading philosophical as well as other

ingenious Authors, than _Janua linguarum_, crabbed poems, and

cross-grained prose, as it has been heretofore by others: so it ought to

be afresh considered by all well-wishers, either to the Clergy or

Learning.

I know where it is the fashion of some schools, to prescribe to a lad,

for his evening refreshment, out of COMMENIUS, all the Terms of Art

[_technical terms_] belonging to Anatomy, Mathematics, or some such piece

of Learning. Now, is it not a very likely thing, that a lad should take

most absolute delight in conquering such a pleasant task; where, perhaps,

he has two or three hundred words to keep in mind, with a very small

proportion of sense thereunto belonging: whereas the use and full meaning

of all those difficult terms would have been most insensibly obtained, by

leisurely reading in particular, this or the other science?

Is it not also likely to be very savoury, and of comfortable use to one

that can scarce distinguish between Virtue and Vice, to be tasked with

high and moral poems? It is usually said by those that are intimately

acquainted with him, that HOMER's _Iliad_ and _Odyssey_ contain,

mystically, all the Moral Law for certain, if not a great part of the

Gospel (I suppose much after that rate that RABELAIS said his _Gargantua_

contained all the Ten Commandments!); but perceivable only to those that

have a poetical discerning spirit: with which gift, I suppose, few at

school are so early qualified.

Those admirable verses, Sir, of yours, both English and others, which you

have sometimes favoured me with a sight of, will not suffer me to be so

sottish as to slight and undervalue so great and noble an accomplishment.

But the committing of such high and brave sensed poems to a schoolboy

(whose main business is to search out cunningly the Antecedent and the

Relative; to lie at catch for a spruce Phrase, a Proverb, or a quaint and

pithy Sentence) is not only to very little purpose, but that having

gargled only those elegant books at school, this serves them instead of

reading them afterwards; and does, in a manner, prevent their being

further looked into. So that all improvement, whatsoever it be, that may

be reaped out of the best and choicest poets, is for the most part

utterly lost, in that a time is usually chosen of reading them, when

discretion is much wanting to gain thence any true advantage. Thus that

admirable and highly useful morality, TULLY's _Offices_, because it is a

book commonly construed at school, is generally afterwards so contemned

by Academics, that it is a long hour's work to convince them that it is

worthy of being looked into again; because they reckon it as a book read

over at school, and, no question! notably digested.

If, therefore the ill methods of schooling do not only occasion a great

loss of time there, but also do beget in lads a very odd opinion and

apprehension of Learning, and much disposes them to be idle when they are

got a little free from the usual severities; and that the hopes of more or

less improvement in the Universities very much depend hereupon: it is,

without all doubt, the great concernment of all that wish to the Church,

that such care and regard be had to the management of schools, that the

Clergy be not so much obstructed in their first attempts and preparations

to Learning.

I cannot, Sir, possibly be so ignorant as not to consider that what has

been now offered upon this argument, has not only been largely insisted

on by others; but also refers not particularly to the Clergy (whose

welfare and esteem, I seem at present in a special manner solicitous

about), but in general to all learned professions, and therefore might

reasonably have been omitted: which certainly I had done, had not I

called to mind that of those many that propound to themselves Learning

for a profession, there is scarce one in ten but that his lot, choice, or

necessity determines him to the study of Divinity.

Thus, Sir, I have given you my thoughts concerning the orders and customs

of common schools. A consideration, in my apprehension, not slightly to be

weighed: being that upon which to me seems very much to depend the

learning and wisdom of the Clergy, and the prosperity of the Church.

The next unhappiness that seems to have hindered some of our Clergy from

arriving to that degree of understanding that becomes such a holy office,

whereby their company and discourses might be much more, than they

commonly are, valued and desired, is the inconsiderate sending of all

kinds of lads to the Universities; let their parts be ever so low and

pitiful, the instructions they have lain under ever so mean and

contemptible, and the purses of their friends ever so short to maintain

them there. If they have but the commendation of some lamentable and

pitiful Construing Master, it passes for sufficient evidence that they

will prove persons very eminent in the Church. That is to say, if a lad

has but a lusty and well bearing memory, this being the usual and almost

only thing whereby they judge of their abilities; if he can sing over

very tunably three or four stanzas of LILLY's Poetry; be very quick and

ready to tell what is Latin for all the instruments belonging to his

father's shop; if presently [_at sight_], upon the first scanning, he

knows a Spondee from a Dactyl, and can fit a few of those same, without

any sense, to his fingers' ends; if, lastly, he can say perfectly by

heart his Academic Catechism, in pure and passing Latin, _i.e._, "What is

his Name?" "Where went he to School?" and "What author is he best and

chiefly skilled in?" "A forward boy!" cries the Schoolmaster: "a very

pregnant child! Ten thousand pities, but he should be a Scholar; he

proves a brave Clergyman, I'll warrant you!"

Away to the University he must needs go! Then for a little Logic, a

little Ethics, and, GOD knows! a very little of everything else! And the

next time you meet him, he is in the pulpit!

Neither ought the mischief which arises from small country schools to

pass unconsidered. The little mighty Governors whereof, having, for the

most part, not sucked in above six or seven mouthsful of University air,

must yet, by all means, suppose themselves so notably furnished with all

sorts of instructions, and are so ambitious of the glory of being counted

able to send forth, now and then, to Oxford or Cambridge, from the little

house by the Churchyard's side, one of their ill-educated disciples, that

to such as these ofttimes is committed the guidance and instruction of a

whole parish: whose parts and improvements duly considered, will scarce

render them fit Governors of a small Grammar Castle.

Not that it is necessary to believe, that there never was a learned or

useful person in the Church, but such whose education had been at

Westminster or St. Paul's. But, whereas most of the small schools, being

by their first founders designed only for the advantage of poor parish

children, and also that the stipend is usually so small and discouraging

that very few who can do much more than teach to write and read, will

accept of such preferment: for these to pretend to rig out their small

ones for a University life, proves ofttimes a very great inconvenience

and damage to the Church.

And as many such Dismal Things are sent forth thus, with very small

tackling; so not a few are predestinated thither by their friends, from

the foresight of a good benefice. If there be rich pasture, profitable

customs, and that HENRY VIII. has taken out no toll, the Holy Land is a

very good land, and affords abundance of milk and honey! Far be it from

their consciences, the considering whether the lad is likely to be

serviceable to the Church, or to make wiser and better any of his

parishioners!

All this may seem, at first sight, to be easily avoided by a strict

examination at the Universities; and so returning by the next carrier,

all that was sent up not fit for their purpose. But because many of their

relations are ofttimes persons of an inferior condition; and who (either

by imprudent counsellors, or else out of a tickling conceit of their sons

being, forsooth, a University Scholar) have purposely omitted all other

opportunities of a livelihood; to return such, would seem a very sharp

and severe disappointment.

Possibly, it might be much better, if parents themselves or their

friends, would be much more wary of determining their children to the

trade of Learning. And if some of undoubted knowledge and judgement,

would offer their advice; and speak their hopes of a lad, about 13 or 14

years of age (which, I will assure you, Sir, may be done without

conjuring!); and never omit to inquire, Whether his relations are able

and willing to maintain him seven years at the University, or see some

certain way of being continued there so long, by the help of friends or

others, as also upon no such conditions as shall, in likelihood, deprive

him of the greatest parts of his studies?

For it is a common fashion of a great many to compliment and invite

inferior people's children to the University, and there pretend to make

such an all bountiful provision for them, as they shall not fail of

coming to a very eminent degree of Learning; but when they come there,

they shall save a servant's wages. They took therefore, heretofore, a

very good method to prevent Sizars overheating their brains. Bed-making,

chamber-sweeping, and water-fetching were doubtless great preservatives

against too much vain philosophy. Now certainly such pretended favours

and kindnesses as these, are the most right down discourtesies in the

World. For it is ten times more happy, both for the lad and the Church,

to be a corn-cutter or tooth-drawer, to make or mend shoes, or to be of

any inferior profession; than to be invited to, and promised the

conveniences of, a learned education; and to have his name only stand

airing upon the College Tables [_Notice-boards_], and his chief business

shall be, to buy eggs and butter.

Neither ought lads' parts, before they be determined to the University,

be only considered, and the likelihood of being disappointed in their

studies; but also abilities or hopes of being maintained until they be

Masters of Arts. For whereas 200, for the most part, yearly Commence

[_Matriculate_], scarce the fifth part of these continue after their

taking the First Degree [_B.A._]. As for the rest, having exactly

learned, _Quid est Logica_? and _Quot sunt Virtutes Morales_? down they

go, by the first carrier, on the top of the pack, into the West, or

North, or elsewhere, according as their estates lie; with BURGESDICIUS,

EUSTACHIUS, and such great helps of Divinity; and then, for propagation

of the Gospel! By that time they can say the _Predicaments_ and _Creed_;

they have their choice of preaching or starving! Now what a Champion of

Truth is such a thing likely to be! What a huge blaze he makes in the

Church! What a Raiser of Doctrines! What a Confounder of Heresies! What

an able Interpreter of hard Places! What a Resolver of Cases of

Conscience! and what a prudent guide must he needs be to all his parish!

You may possibly think, Sir, that this so early preaching might be easily

avoided, by withholding Holy Orders; the Church having very prudently

constituted in her _Canons_, that none under twenty-three years of age,

which is the usual age after seven years being at the University, should

be admitted to that great employment.

This indeed might seem to do some service, were it carefully observed;

and were there not a thing to be got, called a _Dispensation_, which will

presently [_at once_] make you as old as you please.

But if you will, Sir, we will suppose that Orders were strictly denied to

all, unless qualified according to _Canon_, I cannot foresee any other

remedy but that most of those University youngsters must fall to the

parish, and become a town charge until they be of spiritual age. For

Philosophy is a very idle thing, when one is cold! and a small _System of

Divinity_, though it be WOLLEBIUS himself, is not sufficient when one is

hungry!

What then shall we do with them? and where shall we dispose of them,

until they come to a holy ripeness?

May we venture them into the Desk to read _Service_? That cannot be,

because not capable! Besides, the tempting Pulpit usually stands too

near. Or shall we trust them in some good Gentleman's house, there to

perform holy things? With all my heart! so that they may not be called

down from their studies to say Grace to every Health; that they may have

a little better wages than the Cook or Butler; as also that there be a

Groom in the house, besides the Chaplain (for sometimes to the £10 a

year, they crowd [in] the looking after couple of geldings): and that he

may not be sent from table, picking his teeth, and sighing with his hat

under his arm; whilst the Knight and my Lady eat up the tarts and

chickens!

It may be also convenient, if he were suffered to speak now and then in

the Parlour, besides at Grace and Prayer time; and that my cousin ABIGAIL

and he sit not too near one another at meals, nor be presented together to

the little vicarage!

All this, Sir, must be thought on! For, in good earnest, a person at all

thoughtful of himself and conscience, had much better choose to live with

nothing but beans and pease pottage, so that he might have the command of

his thoughts and time; than to have his Second and Third Courses, and to

obey the unreasonable humours of some families.

And as some think two or three years' continuance in the University, to

be time sufficient for being very great Instruments in the Church: so

others we have, so moderate as to count that a solemn admission and a

formal paying of College Detriments, without the trouble of Philosophical

discourses, disputations, and the like, are virtues that will influence as

far as Newcastle, and improve though at ever such a distance.

So strangely possessed are people in general, with the easiness and small

preparation that are requisite to the undertaking of the Ministry, that

whereas in other professions, they plainly see, what considerable time is

spent before they have any hopes of arriving to skill enough to practise

with any confidence what they have designed; yet to preach to ordinary

people, and govern a country parish, is usually judged such an easy

performance, that anybody counts himself fit for the employment. We find

very few so unreasonably confident of their parts, as to profess either

Law or Physic, without either a considerable continuance in some of the

Inns of Courts, or an industrious search in herbs, Anatomy, Chemistry,

and the like, unless it be only to make a bond [_bandage_] or give a

glyster [_an injection_]. But as for "the knack of Preaching" as they

call it, that is such a very easy attainment, that he is counted dull to

purpose, that is not able, at a very small warning, to fasten upon any

text of Scripture, and to tear and tumble it, till the glass [_the

hourglass on the pulpit_] be out.

Many, I know very well, are forced to discontinue [_at College_], having

neither stock [_capital_] of their own, nor friends to maintain them in

the University. But whereas a man's profession and employment in this

world is very much in his own, or in the choice of such who are most

nearly concerned for him; he therefore, that foresees that he is not

likely to have the advantage of a continued education, he had much better

commit himself to an approved-of cobbler or tinker, wherein he may be duly

respected according to his office and condition of life; than to be only a

disesteemed pettifogger or empiric in Divinity.

By this time, Sir, I hope you begin to consider what a great disadvantage

it has been to the Church and Religion, the mere venturous and

inconsiderate determining of Youths to the profession of Learning.

There is still one thing, by very few, at all minded, that ought also not

to be overlooked: and that is, a good constitution and health of body. And

therefore discreet and wise physicians ought also to be consulted, before

an absolute resolve be made to live the Life of the Learned. For he that

has strength enough to buy and bargain, may be of a very unfit habit of

body to sit still so much, as, in general, is requisite to a competent

degree of Learning. For although reading and thinking break neither legs

nor arms; yet, certainly, there is nothing that flags the spirits,

disorders the blood, and enfeebles the whole body of Man, as intense

studies.

As for him that rives blocks or carries packs, there is no great expense

of parts, no anxiety of mind, no great intellectual pensiveness. Let him

but wipe his forehead, and he is perfectly recovered! But he that has

many languages to remember, the nature of almost the whole world to

consult, many histories, Fathers, and Councils to search into; if the

fabric of his body be not strong and healthful, you will soon find him as

thin as a piece of metaphysics, and look as piercing as a School subtilty.

This, Sir, could not be conveniently omitted; not only because many are

very careless in this point, and, at a venture, determine their young

relations to Learning: but because, for the most part, if, amongst many,

there be but one of all the family that is weak and sickly, that is

languishing and consumptive; this, of all the rest, as counted not fit

for any coarse employment, shall be picked out as a Choice Vessel for the

Church! Whereas, most evidently, he is much more able to dig daily in the

mines, than to set cross-legged, musing upon his book.

I am very sensible, how obvious it might be, here, to hint that this so

curious and severe Inquiry would much hinder the practice, and abate the

flourishing of the Universities: as also, there have been several, and

are still, many Living Creatures in the world, who, whilst young, being

of a very slow and meek apprehension, have yet afterward cheered up into

a great briskness, and become masters of much reason. And others there

have been, who, although forced to a short continuance in the University,

and that ofttimes interrupted by unavoidable services, have yet, by

singular care and industry, proved very famous in their generation. And

lastly, some also, of very feeble and crazy constitutions in their

childhood, have out-studied their distempers, and have become very

healthful and serviceable in the Church.

As for the flourishing, Sir, of the Universities--what has been before

said, aims not in the least at Gentlemen, whose coming thither is chiefly

for the hopes of single [_personal_] improvement; and whose estates do

free them from the necessity of making a gain of Arts and Sciences: but

only at such as intend to make Learning their profession, as well as

[their] accomplishment. So that our Schools may be still as full of

flourishings, of fine clothes, rich gowns, and future benefactors, as

ever.

And suppose we do imagine, as it is necessary we should, that the number

should be a little lessened; this surely will not abate the true

splendour of a University in any man's opinion, but his who reckons the

flourishing thereof, rather from the multitude of mere gowns than from

the Ingenuity and Learning of those that wear them: no more than we have

reason to count the flourishing of the Church from that vast number of

people that crowd into Holy Orders, rather than from those learned and

useful persons that defend her Truths, and manifest her Ways.

But I say, I do not see any perfect necessity that our Schools should

hereupon be thinned and less frequented: having said nothing against the

Multitude, but the _indiscreet choice_. If therefore, instead of such,

either of inferior parts or a feeble constitution, or of unable friends;

there were picked out those that were of a tolerable ingenuity [_natural

capacity_], of a study-bearing body, and had good hopes of being

continued; as hence there is nothing to hinder our Universities from

being full, so likewise from being of great credit and learning.

Not to deny, then, but that, now and then, there has been a lad of very

submissive parts, and perhaps no great share of time allowed him for his

studies, who has proved, beyond all expectation, brave and glorious: yet,

surely, we are not to over-reckon this so rare a hit, as to think that one

such proving lad should make recompense and satisfaction for those many

"weak ones," as the common people love to phrase them, that are in the

Church. And that no care ought to be taken, no choice made, no

maintenance provided or considered; because (now and then in an Age) one,

miraculously, beyond all hopes, proves learned and useful; is a practice,

whereby never greater mischiefs and disesteem have been brought upon the

Clergy.

I have, in short, Sir, run over what seemed to me, the First Occasions of

that Small Learning that is to be found amongst some of the Clergy. I

shall now pass from Schooling to the Universities.

I am not so unmindful of that devotion which I owe to those places, nor

of that great esteem I profess to have of the Guides and Governors

thereof, as to go about to prescribe new Forms and Schemes of Education;

where Wisdom has laid her top-stone. Neither shall I here examine which

Philosophy, the Old or New, makes the best sermons. It is hard to say,

that exhortations can be to _no_ purpose, if the preacher believes that

the earth turns round! or that his reproofs can take _no_ effect, unless

he will suppose a vacuum! There have been good sermons, no question! made

in the days of _Materia Prima_ and Occult Qualities: and there are,

doubtless, still good discourses now, under the reign of Atoms.

There are but two things, wherein I count the Clergy chiefly concerned,

as to University Improvements, that, at present, I shall make Inquiry

into.

And the first is this: Whether or not it were not highly useful,

especially for the Clergy who are supposed to speak English to the

people, that _English Exercises were imposed upon lads_, if not in Public

Schools, yet at least privately. Not but that I am abundantly satisfied

that Latin (O Latin! it is the all in all! and the very cream of the

jest!); as also, that Oratory is the same in all languages, the same

rules being observed, the same method, the same arguments and arts of

persuasion: but yet, it seems somewhat beyond the reach of ordinary youth

so to apprehend those general Laws as to make a just and allowable use of

them in all languages, unless exercised particularly in them.

Now we know the language that the very learned part of this nation must

trust to live by, unless It be to make a bond [_bandage_] or prescribe a

purge (which possibly may not oblige or work so well in any other

language as Latin) is the English: and after a lad has taken his leave of

Madame University, GOD bless him! he is not likely to deal afterwards with

much Latin; unless it be to checker [_variegate_] a sermon, or to say

_Salveto_! to some travelling _Dominatio vestra_. Neither is it enough to

say, that the English is the language with which we are swaddled and

rocked asleep; and therefore there needs none of this artificial and

superadded care. For there be those that speak very well, plainly, and to

the purpose; and yet write most pernicious and fantastical stuff: thinking

that whatsoever is written must be more than ordinary, must be beyond the

guise [_manner_] of common speech, must savour of reading and Learning,

though it be altogether needless, and perfectly ridiculous.

Neither ought we to suppose it sufficient that English books be

frequently read, because there be of all sorts, good and bad; and the

worst are likely to be admired by Youth more than the best: unless

Exercises be required of lads; whereby it may be guessed what their

judgement is, where they be mistaken, and what authors they propound to

themselves for imitation. For by this means, they may be corrected and

advised early, according as occasion shall require: which, if not done,

their ill style will be so confirmed, their improprieties of speech will

become so natural, that it will be a very hard matter to stir or alter

their fashion of writing.

It is very curious to observe what delicate letters, your young students

write! after they have got a little smack of University learning. In what

elaborate heights, and tossing nonsense, will they greet a right down

English father, or country friend! If there be a plain word in it, and

such as is used at home, this "tastes not," say they, "of education among

philosophers!" and is counted damnable duncery and want of fancy. Because

"Your loving friend" or "humble servant" is a common phrase in country

letters; therefore the young Epistler is "Yours, to the Antipodes!" or at

least "to the Centre of the earth!": and because ordinary folks "love" and

"respect" you; therefore you are to him, "a Pole Star!" "a Jacob's Staff!"

"a Loadstone!" and "a damask Rose!"

And the misery of it is, that this pernicious accustomed way of

expression does not only, ofttimes, go along with them to their benefice,

but accompanies them to the very grave.

And, for the most part, an ordinary cheesemonger or plum-seller, that

scarce[ly] ever heard of a University, shall write much better sense, and

more to the purpose than these young philosophers, who injudiciously

hunting only for great words, make themselves learnedly ridiculous.

Neither can it be easily apprehended, how the use of English Exercises

should any ways hinder the improvement in the Latin tongue; but rather be

much to its advantage: and this may be easily believed, considering what

dainty stuff is usually produced for a Latin entertainment! Chicken broth

is not thinner than that which is commonly offered for a Piece of most

pleading and convincing Sense!

For, I will but suppose an Academic youngster to be put upon a Latin

Oration. Away he goes presently to his magazine of collected phrases! He

picks out all the Glitterings he can find. He hauls in all Proverbs,

"Flowers," Poetical snaps [_snatches_], Tales out of the _Dictionary_, or

else ready Latined to his hand, out of LYCOSTHENES.

This done, he comes to the end of the table, and having made a submissive

leg [_made a submissive bow_] and a little admired [_gazed at_] the

number, and understanding countenances of his auditors: let the subject

be what it will, he falls presently into a most lamentable complaint of

his insufficiency and tenuity [_slenderness_] that he, poor thing! "hath

no acquaintance with above a Muse and a half!" and "that he never drank

above six quarts of Helicon!" and you "have put him here upon such a

task" (perhaps the business is only, Which is the nobler creature, a Flea

or a Louse?) "that would much better fit some old soaker at Parnassus,

than his sipping unexperienced bibbership." Alas, poor child! he is

"sorry, at the very soul! that he has no better speech! and wonders in

his heart, that you will lose so much time as to hear him! for he has

neither squibs nor fireworks, stars nor glories! The cursed carrier lost

his best Book of Phrases; and the malicious mice and rats eat up all his

_Pearls_ and _Golden Sentences_."

Then he tickles over, a little, the skirts of the business. By and by,

for similitude from the Sun and Moon, or if they be not at leisure, from

"the grey-eyed Morn," or "a shady grove," or "a purling stream."

This done, he tells you that "_Barnaby Bright_ would be much too short,

for him to tell you all that he could say": and so, "fearing he should

break the thread of your patience," he concludes.

Now it seems, Sir, very probable, that if lads did but first of all,

determine in English what they intended to say in Latin; they would, of

themselves, soon discern the triflingness of such Apologies, the

pitifulness of their Matter, and the impertinency of their Tales and

Fancies: and would (according to their subject, age, and parts) offer

that which would be much more manly, and towards tolerable sense.

And if I may tell you, Sir, what I really think, most of that

ridiculousness, of those phantastical phrases, harsh and sometimes

blasphemous metaphors, abundantly foppish similitudes, childish and empty

transitions, and the like, so commonly uttered out of pulpits, and so

fatally redounding to the discredit of the Clergy, may, in a great

measure, be charged upon the want of that, which we have here so much

contended for.

The second Inquiry that may be made is this: _Whether or not Punning,

Quibbling, and that which they call Joquing_ [joking], _and such

delicacies of Wit_, highly admired in some Academic Exercises, _might not

be very conveniently omitted_?

For one may desire but to know this one thing: In what Profession shall

that sort of Wit prove of advantage? As for Law, where nothing but the

most reaching subtility and the closest arguing is allowed of; it is not

to be imagined that blending now and then a piece of a dry verse, and

wreathing here and there an odd Latin Saying into a dismal jingle, should

give Title to an estate, or clear out an obscure evidence! And as little

serviceable can it be to Physic, which is made up of severe Reason and

well tried Experiments!

And as for Divinity, in this place I shall say no more, but that those

usually that have been Rope Dancers in the Schools, ofttimes prove Jack

Puddings in the Pulpit.

For he that in his youth has allowed himself this liberty of Academic

Wit; by this means he has usually so thinned his judgement, becomes so

prejudiced against sober sense, and so altogether disposed to trifling

and jingling; that, so soon as he gets hold of a text, he presently

thinks he has catched one of his old School Questions; and so falls a

flinging it out of one hand into another! tossing it this way, and that!

lets it run a little upon the line, then "_tanutus_! high jingo! come

again!" here catching at a word! there lie nibbling and sucking at an

_and_, a _by_, a _quis_ or a _quid_, a _sic_ or a _sicut_! and thus

minces the Text so small that his parishioners, until he _rendezvous_

[_reassemble_] it again, can scarce tell, what is become of it.

But "Shall we debar Youth of such an innocent and harmless recreation, of

such a great quickener of Parts and promoter of sagacity?"

As for the first, its innocency of being allowed of for a time; I am so

far from that persuasion that, from what has been before hinted, I count

it perfectly contagious! and as a thing that, for the most part, infects

the whole life, and influences most actions! For he that finds himself to

have the right knack of letting off a joque, and of pleasing the Humsters;

he is not only very hardly brought off from admiring those goodly

applauses, and heavenly shouts; but it is ten to one! if he directs not

the whole bent of his studies to such idle and contemptible books as

shall only furnish him with materials for a laugh; and so neglects all

that should inform his Judgement and Reason, and make him a man of sense

and reputation in this world.

And as for the pretence of making people sagacious, and pestilently

witty; I shall only desire that the nature of that kind of Wit may be

considered! which will be found to depend upon some such fooleries as

these--

As, first of all, the lucky ambiguity of some word or sentence.

O, what a happiness is it! and how much does a youngster count

himself beholden to the stars! that should help him to such a

taking jest! And whereas there be so many thousand words in the

World, and that he should luck upon the right one! that was so

very much to his purpose, and that at the explosion, made such a

goodly report!

Or else they rake LILLY's _Grammar_; and if they can but find two

or three letters of any name in any of the _Rules_ or _Examples_

of that good man's Works; it is as very a piece of Wit as any has

passed in the Town since the King came in [1660]!

O, how the Freshmen will skip, to hear one of those lines well

laughed at, that they have been so often yerked [_chided_] for!

It is true, such things as these go for Wit so long as they continue in

Latin; but what dismally shrimped things would they appear, if turned

into English! And if we search into what was, or might be pretended; we

shall find the advantages of Latin-Wit to be very small and slender, when

it comes into the World. I mean not only among strict Philosophers and Men

of mere Notions, or amongst all-damning and illiterate HECTORS; but

amongst those that are truly ingenious and judicious Masters of Fancy. We

shall find that a quotation out of _Qui mihi_, an Axiom out of Logic, a

Saying of a Philosopher, or the like, though managed with some quickness

and applied with some seeming ingenuity, will not, in our days, pass, or

be accepted, for Wit.

For we must know that, as we are now in an Age of great Philosophers and

Men of Reason, so of great quickness and fancy! and that Greek and Latin,

which heretofore (though never so impertinently fetched in) was counted

admirable, because it had a learned twang; yet, now, such stuff, being

out of fashion, is esteemed but very bad company!

For the World is now, especially in discourse, for One Language! and he

that has somewhat in his mind of Greek and Latin, is requested,

now-a-days, "to be civil, and translate it into English, for the benefit

of the company!" And he that has made it his whole business to accomplish

himself for the applause of boys, schoolmasters, and the easiest of

Country Divines; and has been shouldered out of the Cockpit for his Wit:

when he comes into the World, is the most likely person to be kicked out

of the company, for his pedantry and overweening opinion of himself.

And, were it necessary, it is an easy matter to appeal to Wits, both

ancient and modern, that (beyond all controversy) have been sufficiently

approved of, that never, I am confident! received their improvements by

employing their time in Puns and Quibbles. There is the prodigious

LUCIAN, the great Don [_QUIXOTE_] of Mancha; and there are many now

living, Wits of our own, who never, certainly, were at all inspired from

a _Tripus_'s, _Terras-filius_'s, or _Praevarecator_'s speech.

I have ventured, Sir, thus far, not to find fault with; but only to

inquire into an ancient custom or two of the Universities; wherein the

Clergy seem to be a little concerned, as to their education there.

I shall now look on them as beneficed, and consider their preaching.

Wherein I pretend to give no rules, having neither any gift at it, nor

authority to do it: but only shall make some conjectures at those useless

and ridiculous things commonly uttered in pulpits, that are generally

disgusted [_disliked_], and are very apt to bring contempt upon the

preacher, and that religion which he professes.

Amongst the first things that seem to be useless, may be reckoned _the

high tossing and swaggering preaching_, either mountingly eloquent, or

profoundly learned. For there be a sort of Divines, who, if they but

happen of an unlucky hard word all the week, they think themselves not

careful of their flock, if they lay it not up till Sunday, and bestow it

amongst them, in their next preachment. Or if they light upon some

difficult and obscure notion, which their curiosity inclines them to be

better acquainted with, how useless soever! nothing so frequent as for

them, for a month or two months together, to tear and tumble this

doctrine! and the poor people, once a week, shall come and gaze upon them

by the hour, until they preach themselves, as they think, into a right

understanding.

Those that are inclinable to make these useless speeches to the people;

they do it, for the most part, upon one of these two considerations.

Either out of simple phantastic glory, and a great studiousness of being

wondered at; as if getting into the pulpit were a kind of Staging

[_acting_]; where nothing was to be considered but how much the sermon

takes! and how much stared at! Or else, they do this to gain a respect

and reverence from their people: "who," say they, "are to be puzzled now

and then, and carried into the clouds! For if the Minister's words be

such as the Constable uses; his matter plain and practical, such as comes

to the common market; he may pass possibly for an honest and well-meaning

man, but by no means for any scholar! Whereas if he springs forth, now

and then, in high raptures towards the uppermost heavens; dashing, here

and there, an all-confounding word! if he soars aloft in unintelligible

huffs! preaches points deep and mystical, and delivers them as darkly and

phantastically! this is the way," say they, "of being accounted a most

able and learned Instructor."

Others there be, whose parts stand not so much towards Tall Words and

Lofty Notions, but consist in scattering up and down and besprinkling all

their sermons with plenty of Greek and Latin. And because St. PAUL, once

or so, was pleased to make use of a little heathen Greek; and that only,

when he had occasion to discourse with some of the learned ones that well

understood him: therefore must they needs bring in twenty Poets and

Philosophers, if they can catch them, into an hour's talk [_evidently the

ordinary length of a sermon at this time, see_ pp. 259, 313]; spreading

themselves in abundance of Greek and Latin, to a company, perhaps, of

farmers and shepherds.

Neither will they rest there, but have at the Hebrew also! not contenting

themselves to tell the people in general, that they "have skill in the

Text, and the exposition they offer, agrees with the Original"; but must

swagger also over the poor parishioners, with the dreadful Hebrew itself!

with their BEN-ISRAELS! BEN-MANASSES! and many more BENS that they are

intimately acquainted with! whereas there is nothing in the church, or

near it by a mile, that understands them, but GOD Almighty! whom, it is

supposed, they go not about to inform or satisfy.

This learned way of talking, though, for the most part, it is done merely

out of ostentation: yet, sometimes (which makes not the case much better),

it is done in compliment and civility to the all-wise Patron, or

all-understanding Justice of the Peace in the parish; who, by the common

farmers of the town, must be thought to understand the most intricate

notions, and the most difficult languages.

Now, what an admirable thing this is! Suppose there should be one or so,

in the whole church, that understands somewhat besides English: shall I

not think that he understands that better? Must I (out of courtship to

his Worship and Understanding; and because, perhaps, I am to dine with

him) prate abundance of such stuff, which, I must needs know, nobody

understands, or that will be the better for it but himself, and perhaps

scarcely he?

This, I say, because I certainly know several of that disposition: who,

if they chance to have a man of any learning or understanding more than

the rest in the parish, preach wholly at him! and level most of their

discourses at his supposed capacity; and the rest of the good people

shall have only a handsome gaze or view of the parson! As if plain words,

useful and intelligible instructions were not as good for an Esquire, or

one that is in Commission from the King, as for him that holds the plough

or mends hedges.

Certainly he that considers the design of his Office, and has a

conscience answerable to that holy undertaking, must needs conceive

himself engaged, not only to mind this or that accomplished or

well-dressed person, but must have a universal care and regard of all his

parish. And as he must think himself bound, not only to visit down beds

and silken curtains, but also flocks and straw [_mattresses_], if there

be need: so ought his care to be as large to instruct the poor, the weak,

and despicable part of his parish, as those that sit in the best pews. He

that does otherwise, thinks not at all of a man's soul: but only

accommodates himself to fine clothes, an abundance of ribbons, and the

highest seat in the church; not thinking that it will be as much to his

reward in the next worlds by sober advice, care, and instruction, to have

saved one that takes collection [_alms_] as him that is able to relieve

half the town. It is very plain that neither our Saviour, when he was

upon earth and taught the World, made any such distinction in his

discourses. What is more intelligible to all mankind than his _Sermon

upon the Mount_! Neither did the Apostles think of any such way. I

wonder, whom they take for a pattern!

I will suppose once again, that the design of these persons is to gain

glory: and I shall ask them, Can there be any greater in the world, than

doing general good? To omit future reward, Was it not always esteemed of

old, that correcting evil practices, reducing people that lived amiss,

was much better than making a high rant about a shuttlecock, and talking

_tara-tantara_ about a feather? Or if they would be only admired, then

would I gladly have them consider, What a thin and delicate kind of

admiration is likely to be produced, by that which is not at all

understood? Certainly, that man has a design of building up to himself

real fame in good earnest, by things well laid and spoken: his way to

effect it is not by talking staringly, and casting a mist before the

people's eyes; but by offering such things by which he may be esteemed,

with knowledge and understanding.

Thus far concerning Hard Words, High Notions, and Unprofitable Quotations

out of learned languages.

I shall now consider such things _as are ridiculous_, that serve for

chimney and market talk, after the sermon be done; and that do cause,

more immediately, the preacher to be scorned and undervalued.

I have no reason, Sir, to go about to determine what style or method is

best for the improvement and advantage of _all_ people. For, I question

not but there have been as many several sorts of Preachers as Orators;

and though very different, yet useful and commendable in their kind.

TULLY takes very deservedly with many, SENECA with others, and CATO, no

question! said things wisely and well. So, doubtless, the same place of

Scripture may by several, be variously considered: and although their

method and style be altogether different, yet they may all speak things

very convenient for the people to know and be advised of. But yet,

certainly, what is most undoubtedly useless and empty, or what is judged

absolutely ridiculous, not by this or that curious or squeamish auditor,

but by every man in the Corporation that understands but plain English

and common sense, ought to be avoided. For all people are naturally born

with such a judgement of true and allowable Rhetoric, that is, of what is

decorous and convenient to be spoken, that whatever is grossly otherwise

is usually ungrateful, not only to the wise and skilful part of the

congregation, but shall seem also ridiculous to the very unlearned

tradesmen [_mechanics_] and their young apprentices. Amongst which, may

be chiefly reckoned these following, _harsh Metaphors, childish

Similitudes_, and _ill-applied Tales_.

The first main thing, I say, that makes many sermons so ridicuous, and

the preachers of them so much disparaged and undervalued, is _an

inconsiderate use of frightful Metaphors_: which making such a remarkable

impression upon the ears, and leaving such a jarring twang behind them,

are oftentimes remembered to the discredit of the Minister as long as he

continues in the parish.

I have heard the very children in the streets, and the little boys close

about the fire, refresh themselves strangely but with the repetition of a

few of such far-fetched and odd sounding expressions. TULLY, therefore,

and CAESAR, the two greatest masters of Roman eloquence, were very wary

and sparing of that sort of Rhetoric. We may read many a page in their

works before we meet with any of those bears; and if you do light upon

one or so, it shall not make your hair stand right up! or put you into a

fit of convulsions! but it shall be so soft, significant, and familiar,

as if it were made for the very purpose.

But as for the common sort of people that are addicted to this sort of

expression in their discourses; away presently to both the Indies! rake

heaven and earth! down to the bottom of the sea! then tumble over all

Arts and Sciences! ransack all shops and warehouses! spare neither camp

nor city, but that they will have them! So fond are such deceived ones of

these same gay words, that they count all discourses empty, dull, and

cloudy; unless bespangled with these glitterings. Nay, so injudicious and

impudent together will they sometimes be, that the Almighty Himself is

often in danger of being dishonoured by these indiscreet and horrid

Metaphor-mongers. And when they thus blaspheme the God of Heaven by such

unhallowed expressions; to make amends, they will put you in an "As it

were" forsooth! or "As I may so say," that is, they will make bold to

speak what they please concerning GOD Himself, rather than omit what they

judge, though never so falsely, to be witty. And then they come in

hobbling with their lame submission, and with their "reverence be it

spoken": as if it were not much better to leave out what they foresee is

likely to be interpreted for blasphemy, or at least great extravagancy;

than to utter that, for which their own reason and conscience tell them,

they are bound to lay in beforehand an excuse.

To which may be further subjoined, that Metaphors, though very apt and

allowable, are intelligible but to some sorts of men, of this or that

kind of life, of this or that profession.

For example, perhaps one Gentleman's metaphorical knack of preaching

comes of the sea; and then we shall hear of nothing but "starboard" and

"larboard," of "stems," "sterns," and "forecastles," and such salt-water

language: so that one had need take a voyage to Smyrna or Aleppo, and

very warily attend to all the sailors' terms, before I shall in the least

understand my teacher. Now, though such a sermon may possibly do some good

in a coast town; yet upward into the country, in an inland parish, it will

do no more than Syriac or Arabic.

Another, he falls a fighting with his text, and makes a pitched battle of

it, dividing it into the Right Wing and Left Wing; then he _rears_ it!

_flanks_ it! _intrenches_ it! _storms_ it! and then he _musters_ all

again! to see what word was lost or lamed in the skirmish: and so falling

on again, with fresh valour, he fights backward and forward! charges

through and through! routs! kills! takes! and then, "Gentlemen! as you

were!" Now to such of his parish as have been in the late wars, this is

not very formidable; for they do but suppose themselves at Edgehill or

Naseby, and they are not much scared at his doctrine: but as for others,

who have not had such fighting opportunities, it is very lamentable to

consider how shivering they sit without understanding, till the battle be

over!

Like instance might be easily given of many more discourses, the

metaphorical phrasing whereof, depending upon peculiar arts, customs,

trades, and professions, makes them useful and intelligible only to such,

who have been very well busied in such like employments.

Another thing, Sir, that brings great disrespect and mischief upon the

Clergy, and that differs not much from what went immediately before, is

their _packing their sermons so full of Similitudes_; which, all the

World knows, carry with them but very small force of argument, unless

there be _an exact agreement with that which is compared_, of which there

is very seldom any sufficient care taken.

Besides, those that are addicted to this slender way of discourse, for

the most part, do so weaken and enfeeble their judgement, by contenting

themselves to understand by colours, features, and glimpses; that they

perfectly omit all the more profitable searching into the nature and

causes of things themselves. By which means, it necessarily comes to

pass, that what they undertake to prove and clear out to the

Congregation, must needs be so faintly done, and with such little force

of argument, that the conviction or persuasion will last no longer in the

parishioners' minds, than the warmth of those similitudes shall glow in

their fancy. So that he that has either been instructed in some part of

his duty, or excited to the performance of the same, not by any judicious

dependence of things, and lasting reason; but by such faint and toyish

evidence: his understanding, upon all occasions, will be as apt to be

misled as ever, and his affections as troublesome and ungovernable.

But they are not so Unserviceable, as, usually, they are Ridiculous. For

people of the weakest parts are most commonly overborn with these

fooleries; which, together with the great difficulty of their being

prudently managed, must needs occasion them, for the most part, to be

very trifling and childish.

Especially, if we consider the choiceness of the authors out of which

they are furnished. There is the never-to-be-commended-enough

LYCOSTHENES. There is also the admirable piece [by FRANCIS MERES] called

the _Second Part of Wits Commonwealth_ [1598]: I pray mind it! it is the

_Second Part_, and not the _First_! And there is, besides, a book wholly

consisting of Similitudes [? JOHN SPENCER's _Things New and Old, or a

Storehouse of Similies, Sentences, Allegories, &c._, 1658] applied and

ready fitted to most preaching subjects, for the help of young beginners,

who sometimes will not make them hit handsomely.

It is very well known that such as are possessed with an admiration of

such eloquence, think that they are very much encouraged in their way by

the Scripture itself. "For," say they, "did not our blessed Saviour

himself use many metaphors and many parables? and did not his disciples,

following his so excellent an example, do the like? And is not this, not

only warrant enough, but near upon a command to us so to do?"

If you please, therefore, we will see what our Saviour does in this case.

In _St. Matthew_ he tells his disciples, that "they are the salt of the

earth," that "they are the light of the world," that "they are a city set

on a hill." Furthermore, he tells his Apostles, that "he sends them forth

as sheep in the midst of wolves;" and bids them therefore "be as wise as

serpents, and harmless as doves." Now, are not all these things plain and

familiar, even almost to children themselves, that can but taste and see;

and to men of the lowest education and meanest capacities!

I shall not here insist upon those special and admirable reasons for

which our Saviour made use of so many parables. Only thus much is needful

to be said, namely, that they are very much mistaken, that, from hence,

think themselves tolerated to turn all the world into frivolous and

abominable similitudes.

As for our Saviour, when he spoke a parable, he was pleased to go no

further than the fields, the seashore, a garden, a vineyard, or the like;

which are things, without the knowledge whereof, scarcely any man can be

supposed to live in this world.

But as for our Metaphorical- and Similitude-Men of the Pulpit, these

things to them, are too still and languid! they do not rattle and rumble!

These lie too near home, and within vulgar ken! There is little on this

side the moon that will content them! Up, presently, to the _Primum

Mobile_, and the Trepidation of the Firmament! Dive into the bowels and

hid treasures of the earth! Despatch forthwith, for Peru and Jamaica! A

town bred or country bred similitude is worth nothing!

"It is reported of a tree growing upon the bank of Euphrates, the

great river Euphrates! that it brings forth an Apple, to the eye

very fair and tempting; but inwardly it is filled with nothing

but useless and deceiving dust. Even so, dust we are; and to dust

we must all go!"

Now, what a lucky discovery was this, that a man's Body should be so

exactly like an Apple! And, I will assure you that this was not thought

on, till within these few years!

And I am afraid, too, he had a kind of a hint of this, from another who

had formerly found out that a man's

Soul was like an Oyster. For, says he in his prayer, "Our souls

are constantly gaping after thee, O LORD! yea, verily, our souls

do gape, even as an oyster gapeth!"

It seems pretty hard, at first sight, to bring into a sermon all the

Circles of the Globe and all the frightful terms of Astronomy; but I will

assure you, Sir, it is to be done! because it has been. But not by every

bungler and ordinary text-divider; but by a man of great cunning and

experience.

There is a place in the prophet _Malachi_, where it will do very

nicely, and that is chapter iv. ver. 2, "But unto you, that fear

my Name, shall the Sun of Righteousness arise with healing in his

wings." From which words, in the first place, it plainly appears

that our Saviour passed through all the twelve signs of the

Zodiac; and more than that too, all proved by very apt and

familiar places of Scripture.

First, then, our Saviour was in _Aries_. Or else, what means that

of the Psalmist, "The mountains skipped like rams, and the little

hills like lambs!"? And again, that in Second of the _Kings_,

chap. iii. ver. 4, "And MESHA, King of Moab, was a sheep master,

and rendered unto the King of Israel an hundred thousand lambs,"

and what follows, "and an hundred thousand rams, with the wool!"

Mind it! it was the King of Israel!

In like manner, was he in _Taurus. Psalm_ xxii. 12. "Many bulls

have compassed me! Strong bulls of Bashan have beset me round!"

They were not ordinary bulls. They were _compassing_ bulls! they

were _besetting_ bulls! they were _strong Bashan_ bulls!

What need I speak of _Gemini_? Surely you cannot but remember

ESAU and JACOB! _Genesis_ xxv. 24. "And when her days to be

delivered were fulfilled, behold there were Twins in her womb!"

Or of _Cancer_? when, as the Psalmist says so plainly, "What

ailed thee, O thou sea, that thou fleddest? thou Jordan! that

thou wast driven back?" Nothing more plain!

It were as easy to shew the like in all the rest of the Signs.

But instead of that, I shall rather choose to make this one

practical Observation. That the mercy of GOD to mankind in

sending His Son into the world, was a very _signal_ mercy. It was

a _zodiacal_ mercy! I say it was truly zodiacal; for CHRIST keeps

within the Tropics! He goes not out of the Pale of the Church;

but yet he is not always at the same distance from a believer.

Sometimes he withdraws himself into the _apogaeum_ of doubt,

sorrow, and despair; but then he comes again into the _perigaeum_

of joy, content, and assurance; but as for heathens and

unbelievers, they are all arctic and antarctic reprobates!

Now when such stuff as this, as sometimes it is, is vented in a poor

parish, where people can scarce tell, what day of the month it is by the

Almanack? how seasonable and savoury it is likely to be!

It seems also not very easy for a man in his sermon to learn [_teach_]

his parishioners how to dissolve gold, of what, and how the stuff is

made. Now, to ring the bells and call the people on purpose together,

would be but a blunt business; but to do it neatly, and when nobody

looked for it, that is the rarity and art of it!

Suppose, then, that he takes for his text that of _St. Matthew_,

"Repent ye, for the Kingdom of GOD is at hand." Now, tell me,

Sir, do you not perceive the gold to be in a dismal fear! to curl

and quiver at the first reading of these words! It must come in

thus, "The blots and blurs of our sins must be taken out by the

_aqua-fortis_ of our tears; to which _aqua-fortis_, if you put a

fifth part of _sal-ammoniac_, and set them in a gentle heat, it

makes _aqua-regia_ which dissolves gold."

And now it is out! Wonderful are the things that are to be done by the

help of metaphors and similitudes! And I will undertake that, with a

little more pains and considerations, out of the very same words, he

could have taught the people how to make custards, or marmalade, or to

stew prunes!

But, pray, why "the _aqua-fortis_ of tears?" For if it so falls out that

there should chance to be neither Apothecary, nor Druggist at church,

there is an excellent jest wholly lost!

Now had he been so considerate as to have laid his wit in some more

common and intelligible material; for example, had he said the "blots of

sin" will be easily taken out "by the soap of sorrow, and the

fullers-earth of contrition," then possibly the Parson and the parish

might all have admired one another. For there be many a good-wife that

understands very well all the intrigues of pepper, salt, and vinegar, who

knows not anything of the all-powerfulness of _aqua-fortis_, how that it

is such a spot-removing liquor!

I cannot but consider with what understanding the people sighed and

cried, when the Minister made for them this metaphysical confession:

"Omnipotent All! Thou art only! Because Thou art all, and because

Thou only art! As for us, we are not; but we seem to be! and only

seem to be, because we are not! for we be but Mites of Entity,

and Crumbs of Something!" and so on.

As if a company of country people were bound to understand SUAREZ, and

all the School Divines!

And as some are very high and learned in their attempts; so others there

be, who are of somewhat too mean and dirty imagination.

Such was he, who goes by the name of Parson SLIPSTOCKING. Who preaching

about the grace and assistance of GOD, and that of ourselves we are able

to do nothing, advised his "beloved" to take him this plain similitude.

"A father calls his child to him, saying, 'Child, pull off this

stocking!' The child, mightily joyful that it should pull off

father's stocking, takes hold of the stocking, and tugs! and

pulls! and sweats! but to no purpose: for stocking stirs not, for

it is but a child that pulls! Then the father bids the child to

rest a little, and try again. So then the child sets on again,

tugs again; but no stocking comes: for child is but a child! Then

the father taking pity upon his child, puts his hand behind and

slips down the stocking; and off comes the stocking! Then how

does the child rejoice! for child hath pulled off father's

stocking, Alas, poor child! it was not child's strength, it was

not child's sweating that got off the stocking; but yet it was

the father's hand that slipped down the stocking. Even so--"

Not much unlike to this, was he that, preaching about the Sacrament and

Faith, makes CHRIST a shopkeeper; telling you that "CHRIST is a Treasury

of all wares and commodities," and thereupon, opening his wide throat,

cries aloud,

"Good people! what do you lack? What do you buy? Will you buy any

balm of Gilead? any eye salve? any myrrh, aloes, or cassia? Shall

I fit you with a robe of Righteousness, or with a white garment?

See here! What is it you want? Here is a choice armoury! Shall I

shew you a helmet of Salvation, a shield, or breastplate of

Faith? or will you please to walk in and see some precious

stones? a jasper, a sapphire, a chalcedony? Speak, what do you

buy?"

Now, for my part, I must needs say (and I much fancy I speak the mind of

thousands) that it had been much better for such an imprudent and

ridiculous bawler as this, to have been condemned to have cried oysters

or brooms, than to discredit, after this unsanctified rate, his

Profession and our Religion.

It would be an endless thing, Sir, to count up to you all the follies,

for a hundred years last past, that have been preached and printed of

this kind. But yet I cannot omit that of the famous Divine in his time,

who, advising the people in days of danger to run unto the LORD, tells

them that "they cannot go to the LORD, much less run, without feet;" that

"there be therefore two feet to run to the LORD, Faith and Prayer."

"It is plain that Faith is a foot, for, 'by Faith we stand,' 2

_Cor_. i. 24; therefore by Faith, we must run to the LORD who is

faithful.

"The second is Prayer, a spiritual Leg to bear us thither. Now

that Prayer is a spiritual Leg appears from several places in

Scripture, as from that of JONAH speaking of _coming_, chap. ii.

ver. 7, 'And my prayer _came_ unto thy holy temple.' And likewise

from that of the Apostle who says, _Heb_. iv. 16, 'Let us

therefore _go_ unto the throne of grace.' Both intimating that

Prayer is a spiritual Leg: there being no _coming_ or _going_ to

the LORD without the Leg of Prayer."

He further adds, "Now that these feet may be able to bear us

thither, we must put on the Hose [_stockings_] of Faith; for the

Apostle says, 'Our feet must be shod with the preparation of the

Gospel of Peace.'"

The truth of it is, the Author is somewhat obscure: for, at first, Faith

was a Foot, and by-and-by it is a Hose, and at last it proves a Shoe! If

he had pleased, he could have made it anything!

Neither can I let pass that of a later Author; who telling us, "It is

Goodness by which we must ascend to heaven," and that "Goodness is the

Milky Way to JUPITER's Palace"; could not rest there, but must tell us

further, that "to strengthen us in our journey, we must not take morning

milk, but some morning meditations:" fearing, I suppose, lest some people

should mistake, and think to go to heaven by eating now and then a mess of

morning milk, because the way was "milky."

Neither ought that to be omitted, not long since printed upon those words

of St. JOHN, "These things write I unto you, that ye sin not."

The Observation is that "it is the purpose of Scripture to drive

men from sin. These Scriptures contain Doctrines, Precepts,

Promises, Threatenings, and Histories. Now," says he, "take these

five smooth stones, and put them into the Scrip of the heart, and

throw them with the Sling of faith, by the Hand of a strong

resolution, against the Forehead of sin: and we shall see it,

like GOLIATH, fall before us."

But I shall not trouble you any further upon this subject: but, if you

have a mind to hear any more of this stuff, I shall refer you to the

learned and judicious Author of the _Friendly Debates_ [_i.e._, SIMON

PATRICK, afterwards Bishop of ELY, who wrote _A Friendly Debate between a

Conformist and a Nonconformist_, in two parts, 1669]: who, particularly,

has at large discovered the intolerable fooleries of this way of talking.

I shall only add thus much, that such as go about to fetch blood into

their pale and lean discourses, by the help of their brisk and sparkling

similitudes, ought well to consider, Whether their similitudes be true?

I am confident, Sir, you have heard it, many and many a time, or, if need

be, I can shew you it in a book, that when the preacher happens to talk

how that the things here below will not satisfy the mind of man; then

comes in, "the round world which cannot fill the triangular heart of

man!" whereas every butcher knows that the heart is no more triangular

than an ordinary pear, or a child's top. But because _triangular_ is a

hard word, and perhaps a jest! therefore people have stolen it one from

another, these two or three hundred years; and, for aught I know, much

longer! for I cannot direct to the first inventor of the fancy.

In like manner, they are to consider, What things, either in the heavens

or belonging to the earth, have been found out, by experience, to

contradict what has been formerly allowed of?

Thus, because some ancient astronomers had observed that both the

distances as well as the revolutions of the planets were in some

proportion or harmony one to another: therefore people that abounded with

more imagination than skill, presently fancied the Moon, Mercury, and

Venus to be a kind of violins or trebles to Jupiter or Saturn; that the

Sun and Mars supplied the room of tenors, and the _Primum Mobile_ running

Division all the tune. So that one could scarce hear a sermon, but they

must give you a touch of "the Harmony of the Spheres."

Thus, Sir, you shall have them take that of St. PAUL, about "faith, hope,

and charity." And instead of a sober instructing of the people in those

eminent and excellent graces, they shall only ring you over a few changes

upon the three words; crying, "Faith! Hope! and Charity!" "Hope! Faith!

and Charity!" and so on: and when they have done their peal, they shall

tell you that "this is much better than the Harmony of the Spheres!"

At other times, I have heard a long chiming only between two words; as

suppose Divinity and Philosophy, or Revelation and Reason. Setting forth

with Revelation first. "Revelation is a Lady; Reason, an Handmaid!

Revelation is the Esquire; Reason, the Page! Revelation is the Sun;

Reason, but the Moon! Revelation is Manna; Reason is but an acorn!

Revelation, a wedge of gold; Reason, a small piece of silver!"

Then, by and by, Reason gets it, and leads it away, "Reason indeed is

very good, but Revelation is much better! Reason is a Councillor, but

Revelation is the Lawgiver! Reason is a candle, but Revelation is the

snuffer!"

Certainly, those people are possessed with a very great degree of

dulness, who living under the means of such enlightening preaching,

should not be mightily settled in the right notion and true bounds of

Faith and Reason.

No less ably, methought, was the difference between the Old Covenant and

the New, lately determined. "The Old Covenant was of Works; the New

Covenant, of Faith. The Old Covenant was by MOSES; The New, by CHRIST.

The Old was heretofore; the New, afterwards. The Old was first; the New

was second. Old things are passed away: behold, all things are become

new." And so the business was very fundamentally done.

I shall say no more upon this subject, but this one thing, which relates

to what was said a little before. He that has got a set of similitudes

calculated according to the old philosophy, and PTOLEMY's system of the

world, must burn his commonplace book, and go a-gleaning for new ones; it

being, nowadays, much more gentle and warrantable to take a similitude

from the Man in the Moon than from _solid_ orbs: for though few people do

absolutely believe that there is any such Eminent Person there; yet the

thing is possible, whereas the other is not.

I have now done, Sir, with that imprudent way of speaking by Metaphor and

Simile. There are many other things commonly spoken out of the pulpit,

that are much to the disadvantage and discredit of the Clergy; that ought

also to be briefly hinted. And that I may the better light upon them, I

shall observe their _common method of Preaching_.

[1.] Before the text be divided, a _Preface_ is to be made.

And it is a great chance if, first of all, the Minister does not make his

text to be _like something or other_.

For example. One, he tells you, "And now, methinks, my Text, like an

ingenious [_clever_] Picture, looks upon all here present: in which, both

nobles and people, may behold their sin and danger represented." This was

a text out of _Hosea_. Now, had it been out of any other place of the

_Bible_; the gentleman was sufficiently resolved to make it like "an

ingenious Picture."

Another taking, perhaps, the very same words, says, "I might compare my

Text to the mountains of Bether, where the LORD disports Himself like a

young hart or a pleasant roe among the spices."

Another man's Text is "like the rod of MOSES, to divide the waves of

sorrow"; or "like the mantle of ELIJAH, to restrain the swelling floods

of grief."

Another gets to his Text thus, "As SOLOMON went up six steps to come to

the great Throne of Ivory, so must I ascend six degrees to come to the

high top-meaning of my Text."

Another thus, "As DEBORAH arose, and went with BARAK to Kadesh; so, if

you will go with him, and call in the third verse of the chapters he will

shew you the meaning of his Text."

Another, he fancies his Text to be extraordinarily like to "an orchard of

pomegranates;" or like "St. MATTHEW sitting at the receipt of custom;" or

like "the dove that NOAH sent out of the Ark."

I believe there are above forty places of Scripture, that have been "like

RACHEL and LEAH": and there is one in _Genesis_, as I well remember, that

is "like a pair of compasses stradling." And, if I be not much mistaken,

there is one, somewhere else, that is "like a man going to Jericho."

Now, Sir, having thus made the way to the Text as smooth and plain as

anything, with a _Preface_, perhaps from ADAM, though his business lie at

the other end of the _Bible_: in the next place; [2] he comes to _divide

the Text_.

An English Garner: Critical Essays & Literary Fragments · 第 41 / 55 题